Remix News – June 14, 2026
Six years ago, in 2020, French political leader Marine Le Pen described the Migrant Pact, which was then in the planning stages, as the “suicide of Europe.” She said it would bring 60 to 70 million new migrants to Europe, as Remix News reported at the time.
Europe is about to find out just how prophetic its critics have been. On June 12, the highly contested EU Migration Pact officially came into force, instantly triggering a sharp political divide across the continent.
Brussels is already signaling a hardline approach toward resistance; the bloc’s own EU Migration Commissioner recently admitted that the Union is preparing a “crackdown” on member states that refuse to comply with the new relocation directives.
At the heart of the controversy is the pact’s mandatory migrant quotas, framed by Brussels as “burden-sharing.” In practice, critics argue this distribution system allows nations like Germany and France a convenient mechanism to offload asylum seekers onto Central and Eastern European nations – such as Poland and Hungary – which have historically maintained strict anti-refugee stances.
Europe’s anti-immigration politicians are already responding to what they say is a law that will bring disaster to Europe. Le Pen, six years later, is calling for a “constitutional referendum on immigration.”
“Tomorrow, the Migration Pact will enter into force. It will require the States of the European Union to welcome migrants, under penalty of fines. When we come to power, we will propose to the French a constitutional referendum on immigration, the only means to regain control of our migration policy,” she wrote on X.
Demain, le Pacte des migrations entrera en vigueur. Il imposera aux États de l’Union européenne d’accueillir des migrants, sous peine d’amendes.
Lorsque nous arriverons au pouvoir, nous proposerons aux Français un référendum constitutionnel sur l’immigration, seul moyen pour…
— Marine Le Pen (@MLP_officiel) June 11, 2026
The financial penalties for defiance are severe. Non-compliant governments face fines as high as €21,000 per migrant, potentially costing dissenting nations hundreds of millions of euros. Furthermore, the pact allows for these financial penalties to be adjusted upward in the coming years, which could quickly escalate the cost of non-compliance into billions of euros.
Meanwhile, other establishment European politicians are celebrating the move. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz tried to frame the migration pact as a positive for controlling immigration.
“The migration turnaround has been initiated—nationally and at the European level. As of today, the Common European Asylum System applies: better control and order, faster procedures, and a fair distribution of responsibility. The reform must be implemented effectively. This is how our country will benefit,” wrote Merz
Die Migrationswende ist eingeleitet - national und europäisch. Ab heute gilt das Gemeinsame Europäische Asylsystem: bessere Steuerung und Ordnung, schnellere Verfahren, gerechte Verteilung von Verantwortung. Die Reform muss effektiv umgesetzt werden. So profitiert unser Land.
— Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz (@bundeskanzler) June 12, 2026
Of course, the EU is also trying to sell the pact on social media as well.
Fairer rules, shared responsibility and stronger coordination. The EU pact on migration and
asylum starts applying today. Watch our video to learn more. pic.twitter.com/ikhjI4P3n5
— EU Council (@EUCouncil) June 12, 2026
The end goal of the EU Migration Pact
Linguistically, the EU’s emphasis on sharing a migration “burden” represents a stark rhetorical departure from the peak of the 2016 refugee crisis. A decade ago, newcomers were widely championed by Brussels as Europe’s future workforce—the doctors, lawyers, and engineers destined to salvage the continent’s aging pension systems. Today, that idealistic language has been replaced by the utilitarian vocabulary of managing a “burden.”
Strategically, the pact acts as a political pressure valve. By reducing the immediate concentration of migrants in Western Europe, Brussels hopes to blunt the rapid electoral rise of populist right-wing parties. Simultaneously, the framework seeks to introduce demographic diversity into Eastern European nations, which EU leadership has long criticized as being overly homogenous and politically conservative. Over the long term, the naturalization and family reunification of these migrants could fundamentally alter the electoral dynamics in these traditionally conservative regions in favor or left-wing and pro-migration parties.
However, Central and Eastern European populations remain overwhelmingly opposed to forced relocation. Decades of polling show a deep societal preference for maintaining current demographic structures, setting the stage for protracted constitutional and political gridlock between national capitals and Brussels.
Hungary under new leadership
The EU’s political chess board has also shifted significantly with Hungary’s recent transition of power. Former Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, long the most fierce opponent of Brussels’ migration quotas, has been succeeded by Prime Minister Péter Magyar.
A report in Euractiv’s newsletter questions “whether some national governments are ready” for the EU Migration Pact, which has “raised questions over whether Brussels will need to crack down on non-compliant capitals.”
In an interview, Migration Commissioner Magnus Brunner said they are ready to use “sticks” to make countries like Hungary fall into line.
“There are sticks and carrots in the pact. So, you get funding, you get money, only if you apply the pact,” he said.
In fact, Euractiv is quite open that Magyar may be more than willing to sell out the public on the issue of migrant quotas.
“Péter Magyar, Hungary’s prime minister, once firmly opposed to the EU migration pact, is now keeping his options open. Pressed by the opposition Fidesz to rule out implementation, he sidestepped the question, saying only that ‘there will be no illegal migrants in Hungary’ under a Tisza government,” wrote Euractiv.
This carefully worded distinction leaves the door wide open for the arrival of migrants who are processed “legally” under the parameters of the new EU framework. Unsurprisingly, Commissioner Brunner has lauded the new Hungarian administration’s shift, calling the government “very constructive” and adding, “Our job is to explain the advantages for Hungary and make them visible on a political level.”
Certainly, Brunner was smart enough to not frame the new migration pact as the “suicide of Europe” while trying threaten the new Hungarian government. He can be given that much credit.
Invaders from the turd world are not Europe’s responsibility. If these invaders are so enriching then why not enrich their own countries instead of representing an existential threat to all of the indigenous peoples of Europe.
Negros don’t belong in Europe. Asiatics don’t belong in Europe. Europe was built up by Europeans Why should we give it away?
In summery, there is no voting this crap out. Therefore….
This is Praktischer Idealismus payed and planned for, by Rebbe Rothschild, through Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, one of the EU-founders, and other nazis.
a lot of websites will not put up anything by henry makow
please join them
they all stink of bullshit
Main point…they now admit it is a burden
Yeah. That’s right. We’re signing pieces of paper. Again.
For decades the filth have been importing more filth. For decades they’ve being saying “we need them” / “they will all become british” / “you’re a racist” / “there’s a migration crisis” (depending on which way the wind coming out of their collective arses is blowing).
For decades, they’ve been giving them free housing, free schooling, free healthcare, free food, free water, free lives. For decades they’ve been raping you to do it.
Now we have another piece of paper that’s going to make it worse. How could it be worse?
Your ancestors fought wars to get your country out of the slime. Now you want to become another slime pit, filled to overflowing with ragheads, gays, niggers, perversion, poverty and death. Look to some shithole like south africa, or the philippines. That’s what you are. No real country. No community. Child prostitutes walking the streets. The dictators living in palaces in other countries. You must be so “proud”.
EU always will entangle themself into the
jewish steared trap of “human rights of illegales”
defended by jewish + goyim lawyers + judges .
therefore ALL LAWS + TREATIES OF EU are VOID !
DEXID; FREXID; SPEXID; SCANEXID .
OUT OF JEWISH STEERED NATO !
I’m Eastern European.
When the Berlin Wall came down, I was 18.
When my country of birth joined the EU, I was 33.
By the time countries like Germany lifted their [illegal] restrictions on workers from new EU member states, I was 40. I had managed to find work in Hong Kong and Singapore, as the US and Western Europe were not a viable option.
Around the same time, Germany, UK, and others rolled out the red carpet for anyone and everyone from Africa, Syria, Afghanistan. Strange, and screaming “double standards”, but hey – I’m sure there is a clear end goal behind this.
Re sharing the “burden” – sure; for centuries, the big nations of Western Europe siphoned untold wealth from Asia, Africa, and Latin America to their own coffers. There was no “sharing” with others back then. Now that illegal migration from those parts of the world has become a huge cost and a political hot potato with very little benefit, how keen they are to “share” this massive headache, expense, and liability with those of us in Central & Eastern Europe, whom they have never even considered European to begin with.
Obviously, it’s going to end in tears for everyone – maybe with the exception of a few million Africans who will be showered with eurocracy’s largesse. Today, anything anti-white, anti-Europe, and anti-human is top of the list for our unelected overlords in Brussels.
‘… the Union is preparing a “crackdown” on member states that refuse to comply with the new relocation directives.’
So this is democracy, EU style: It simply ‘cracks down’ on dissent. Hang on now .. Who authorises those who intend to do the cracking down? Who are they? Surely not the unelected, corrupt ghastlies like the crafty Ursula von der Leyen and the stupid Kaja Kallas? No way. That is a non-starter. A clean re-start will inevitably happen.
Then again, is that really inevitable? Where are the pioneering EU member states that are headed in such a direction? Shading my eyes and squinting into middle distance, I see no attractive prospect.
It’s not suicide……it’s genocide! We are being murdered!
Suicide is the act of intentionally causing one’s own death. Death is the end of life. It is the irreversible cessation of biological functions that sustain a living organism; however, the identification of the moment of death presents certain difficulties.” lol – the moment of death presents certain difficulties ….. Thanks Wikipedia, that’s an eye-opener!
Well, causing one own death is not what the EU is/was all about. Just a custom tailored rope that fits perfectly around unkosher Jewropean’s necks and the EU is one of the international supervisors that makes all go very smooth.
When the EU made its first baby steps WHY were sooooo many useless politicians that proved themselves as total failures in their own nations “exported” to the seats of Brussels or nuyorck? And now some decades later what is it what “we” got or did expect? Ursula’s that lie, Katja’s that are full of Sh.., evil step Mutti’s like Angel(a) and her sponsored green communist offspring turned very brown ala Baerbock and co – all now s(h)itting in positions of international power. Annalena, what a beautiful name for such a wicked black souled thing, went on a mission to Afrika and did upset “diplomaticly” all African leaders she came across with her superiority and political correct feminism, but never managed to stop Muttis or other international “leaders” multicultural: “Wir schaffen das (Euthanasia thing)!” On the contrary! She was never bothered at all.
No! This is no suicide! This is humane managed euthanasia for the unworthy ones. And YOU are getting a humble choice: To pick that is eventually killing YOU. But all on all sites should remember what Wikipedia’s schmart bot scribbled: “The moment of death presents certain difficulties” – for everyone even the superior Joos and pollytical wimmin in power but is not including in any way lifeless bots that explain us how to live and die.
Lower IQ strongly correlates with reactive violence, which includes impulsive, emotional outbursts resulting from intense frustration or perceived threats. Individuals with a lower verbal IQ (averaging around 85) often lack the verbal conflict-resolution skills to de-escalate stressful situations peacefully.
Wicherts, Dolan, and van der Maas (2009) contend that the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans is about 80. A critical evaluation of the studies presented by WDM shows that many of these are based on unrepresentative elite samples. We show that studies of 29 acceptably representative samples on tests other than the Progressive Matrices give a sub-Saharan Africa IQ of 69; studies of the most satisfactory representative samples on the Standard Progressive Matrices give an IQ of 66; studies of 23 acceptably representative samples on the Colored Progressive Matrices give an IQ of 71. The international studies of mathematics, science, and reading give a sub-Saharan African IQ of 66. The four data sets can be averaged to give an IQ of 68 as the best reading of the IQ in sub-Saharan Africa.
Nothing that a “crackdown” on the heads of the treasonous EU & Bwitish “Elites” won’t cure! 😉
@ Tony O’Neill crushed it right out of the gate. Spot on.
‘Share the burden’?! Why create the burden in the first place?! The Epstein club members know what they’re doing in obedience to the lord of the flies.