when i first saw the pic of andrew and virginia
i thought my god she is so incredibly lovely what man would not want to be
loved by her some man get crazes on women who is unwise
but she was not the only one, andrew had dozens of underage girls sent to him by epstein
which is just awful
dilambert@live.com bury st edmonds
on February 17, 2026 at 9:25 am
just as the BBC knew about the crimes of jimmy saville stephen fry freddie starr david frost trevor eve etc etc
so the king MUST have known what his brother was doing
dont forget Charles asked mossad to kill diana
dilambert@live.com bury st edmonds
on February 17, 2026 at 9:49 am
MOSSAD SPY RING
jeffrey Epstein has been linked to israeli espionage, he gathered compromising information on public figures
to blackmail them, potentially working for Israeli intel
he used his connections and properties to collect sensitive information. by blackmail
the jews in our government helped him
Starmer Mandelson Streeting Miliband etc all part of undermining the UK and getting them to not speak of the gaza genocide
and to take the UK to war on iran and turkey for israel
see what dirty bastards jews are ?
The monarchy in England/Britain died during the reign of the Stuart monarchs. This was when feudalism gave way to international capital. Cromwell was bankrolled by “European” finance. Scotland’s MPs were brought off by “English” gold as per Robbie Burns while Marlborough (Churchill) sold out James II for gold to boot and changed sides.
The last of the Stuart monarchs, Queen Anne, had multiple miscarriages. One wonders whether this was entirely due to ill fortune. The incoming Hanoverians, led by George I, had a very weak claim to the British throne and got in because he was not a Catholic; but this facilitated the beginning of Hollywood kings and queens we have to this day.
So the monarchy died a long time ago. Charlie Windor is a costumed pantomime character.
***
In passing:
The Catholic v Protestantism was something I might say, “ a plague on both houses”. And yet Catholicism was more “original” Christianity stemming from Rome and its Empire. Protestantism was more Old Testament. Stephen Goodson in the “History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind,” speculates that one of the great movers of Protestantism in England – Thomas Cromwell, an ancestor of Oliver – had come into contact with the “Genoese” traders. The traders who were disproportionality Jewish – but not all – migrated from Italy to Iberia to Holland to England as commerce shifted from Italy to Western Europe because of the opening of the global sea lanes.
Jews hated Catholicism; a move toward a more Old Testament canon made way for the decriminalising of usury that Catholics indulged in, but more hypocritically. (This is a rather nuanced subject. I do not believe lending at interest is wrong in itself. There are a few shades of grey in all of this.)
Peter Petherington
on February 17, 2026 at 12:21 pm
Been going on for years… even since ‘American Jezebel’ Koo Stark was prancing naked around the Palace being pursued (I have it on good ‘inside authority”) by none other than Randy Andy and the current King…
not that I blame either of them given the horse-face “strumpets” usually on offer from the Bwitish Awistocwacy! 😏
Paul Kirtley
on February 17, 2026 at 1:35 pm
If it is true that the whole Epstein thing was a Mossad operation to blackmail leaders then I guess the fate of Prince Andrew and others may depends on how much they do what is desired of them from the tribe behind the operation.
Anonymous
on February 17, 2026 at 5:41 pm
There can be little doubt that the entire Royal Family knew what was going on (perversion, financial corruption), even if they didn’t participate directly themselves. And it’s not a new phenomenon either. Perhaps it’s time to reopen the Jack the Ripper file.
The most interesting question is why so much is now being disclosed – by which I mean not Epstein, but earlier scandals. Up until a certain point, everything was suppressed. Then suddenly, the entire media was free to print. Why? Answer – because you can’t have a monarchy in the globalist state. The British love affair with the monarchy must be broken. Then the ‘royals’ can retire into private life yet still remain as wealthy string pullers. In Europe, all the monarchies have effectively been done away with (the Netherlands is the best example). Only the British monarchy remains, and that has to go.
peter gosling
on February 17, 2026 at 5:57 pm
BBC savaged as ‘state propaganda channel for perverts ‘ after latest royal coverage
Story by Jasmine Care
The BBC has been criticised for their latest royal coverage after it were accused of not reporting enough on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the Epstein files. Over the last few weeks, Andrew has dominated royal coverage across the UK, with his name cropping up several times in the Epstein files.
While this does not indicate any wrongdoing, and Andrew denies accusations against him, the files have shown how close Andrew and the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein once were. Although the BBC have run stories on the Epstein files, most believe they have not covered the spying element enough.
This appears to be the view of political journalist Steph Brawn, who wrote in The National that the BBC are covering the rest of the Royal Family news as if nothing has happened. The BBC has been criticised for their latest royal coverage after it were accused of not reporting enough on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the Epstein files. Over the last few weeks, Andrew has dominated royal coverage across the UK, with his name cropping up several times in the Epstein spy files.
While this does not indicate any wrongdoing, and Andrew denies accusations against him, the files have shown how close Andrew and the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein once were.
This appears to be the view of political journalist Steph Brawn, who wrote in The National that the BBC are covering the rest of the Royal Family news as if nothing has happened.
She wrote: “In fact, if you look at the stories the BBC has done on King Charles recently, there is actually a headline of ‘Heckler booed the King as he visits Lancashire’.
Brawn also said: “This approach from the BBC which appears to protect the Royal Family is increasingly looking out-of-touch with the public.
“Yes, there are plenty of negative headlines about Mountbatten-Windsor himself – such as US lawmakers saying he needs to testify – but it feels as if there is then a huge blind spot when all you see about the rest of the institution he was a part of his whole life is smiles, the odd bit of charity work, and William trying out a lightweight mobility scooter.”
The article also included a post on X by Mark Curtis, who wrote: “The BBC’s coverage of William is as you’d expect from any national state propaganda channel.”
MM
on February 17, 2026 at 6:38 pm
The royals are at the top of the deeply ingrained British class system so it will probably take time to abolish them, but I think eventually (next century perhaps) they will be dissolved. I think two things will help us toward that end.
If the US and Israel attack Iran and Iran does as it says and targets Arab monarchies and brings them down (and they are brutal to some of their own people) this would shake our own monarchy and make them realise they can fall too. But I think their bigger problem may be that because we have exceedingly rich people now up to billionaires, they are becoming the new royalty as far as some governments are concerned. Royal bloodlines are useful figureheads but ever more quaint and in time the whims of the uber-wealthy will be prioritised over royal wants and needs.
SpeakUp
on February 17, 2026 at 8:24 pm
Perhaps Charles has been so friendly to the invaders from West Asia and the Middle East because he thinks they will accept him as their king in Britain, replacing the Britons who no longer do.
Maybe the idea is to bring them in, put them to work to keep the tax money flowing, and hope all the pesky white people who have concepts and beliefs that are far too sophisticated for their new peasant status will die out.
It looks like the monarchy doesn’t care all that much if the public finds out about its evil deeds. It only cares when the public starts doing something about them. It was time to start back when Princess Diana lost her life. Now Britain is at it’s last chance.
TheyRLying
on February 17, 2026 at 9:40 pm
Releasing some email and other documents tells us very little about the actual blackmail and what the entrapped perps were made to do and for whom. That is what the citizenry has a right to know but the US intel refuses to disclose anything of any real relevance. Why that is relevant is because the evidence does clearly indicate that Trump was a part of a blackmail operation and that his administration likely is being blackmailed to start a war with Iran. It stands to reason that the Rothschild dynasty which from its inception always had superior intel from its agents, even greater than that of the UK, and whom Epstein was more directly working for than with the Mossad (according to his own alleged admissions in the emails), that it is most likely that dynasty is in total control of the Trump administration and likely other governments. Most likely in having no chagrin in using Epstein and Mossad operatives, it also has used its own spooks and intel for blackmail and to be able to concentrate and consolidate such vast wealth and power under its control over the past 200 years.
D.R. Cooper.
on February 17, 2026 at 9:52 pm
Its well over due the fake-jew crew in Windsor are kicked the F out, and confiscate all their private trust assets while your at it.
michael
on February 17, 2026 at 11:41 pm
The Tribe now rules England. The Tribe in The City of London, the financial throne. From there, to the Zionist International and its conquest of the West, of which the Epstein/Maxwell is but a part of the whole and the whole seeks more than Greater Israel. It will do what was done to the Palestinians, to the destruction of Germany, the destruction of the neighboring countries to Israel and.. behold what it did to assassinate Kennedy and other American politicians, to the World Trade Center, to enlist America to wage wars on its behalf.
There is the evil, the rot and the moral corruption, and the Epstein/Maxwells will work in the sewers they inhabit, breed themselves to be in the service to the Tribe, the Zionist International, which take the form of individual fanatics, to the enormously well-financed organizations such as Mossad, AIPAC, et al, as well as the infiltration into governmental laws, academia, entertainment, media… on and on. A conquest by military, by subversion, sabotage and provocateurs.
sophie
on February 18, 2026 at 12:48 am
Is there any definitive writing on who, what and why is ‘royalty’ in the English socio-political context?
I have picked up bits and pieces, such as that English royalty is christened in the Church of England (Good!)
The interesting bit is that the royals are said to work. Work, whatever it is, is productive. In what ways is a royal’s work productive? Does it merit the pay given by treasury for it?
But then, this might be quite the wrong questions. It would probably be better to wonder whether we simply like the royals to be in place; we like them. Britain would not be Britain without them.
Ah, that is it! Our patriotism drives us. And that is mega-good.
andyay
on February 18, 2026 at 1:50 am
The film, The Emerald Forest, which is a dramatization of a true story, tells of the abduction of the son of an engineer, party to the wrecking of the rain forests of Brazil, by an aboriginal tribe.
The engineer spends ten years trying to locate his son until he eventually finds him, living happily with the natives in the Amazon jungle. He pleads with his son to return home with him but his son doesn’t want to. His son is free and loves living in the arboreal paradise.
In his frustration at his son’s unresponsiveness,the engineer appeals to the Chief of the tribe,
“You’re the Chief. You tell him what to do.”
The old Chief replies,
“I wouldn’t be Chief for very long if I told people what to do.”
I wouldn’t be Chief for very long, if I told people what to do. Now, that’s kingship.
cornelius copeman kings lynn
on February 18, 2026 at 8:15 am
Fallout from Epstein and Mandelsons spy ring puts Britain’s House of Lords under scrutiny
Story by Jill Lawless •Britain House of Lords:
Fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein files has landed on the gilded wood and plush red benches of Britain’s House of Lords.
Just who was on the take ?
Parliament’s upper chamber is in the spotlight after former U.K. ambassador to Washington Peter Mandelson was forced to resign as a member of the Lords because of his perversions and spying for mossad
The episode has emboldened critics who say the unelected house is antiquated, undemocratic and far too slow at punishing bad behavior by its members. Supporters say the chamber of more than 850 members-for-life who sport the titles of “Lord” or “Lady” is an unwieldy but essential part of parliamentary democracy.Almost everyone agrees it needs reform, but that task has eluded successive governments.
With the epstein revelations how is starmer still in office ?
more
Lords-a-misbehaving
Long gone are the days when out-of-favor lords could be imprisoned in the Tower of London or beheaded for treason,
Until recently there was little parliamentary authorities could do about those who commit ethical breaches or crimes.
But the photos of Mandelson and Epstein taking Starmer to the “pleasure island ” was sickening
A postman gave his story to the papers that he would deliver from Harrods, nappies for Mandelson
Lord Archer of Weston-Super-Mare, otherwise known as the thriller-writer Jeffrey Archer, was imprisoned for perjury in 2001, while Lord Black of Crossharbour — the media baron Conrad Black — served a U.S. prison sentence after a 2007 fraud conviction. Under the rules of the time, neither could be kicked out of the Lords.
Since then, the law has been changed to allow members to be expelled for breaching the Lords code of conduct, imprisonment or non-attendance. To this day, no one has been expelled for bad behavior, though a couple have quit before being kicked out, including one who committed sexual assault and another filmed allegedly snorting cocaine with sex workers and Wes streeting using young rent boys
something starmer has done for years
Peter Brummit
on February 18, 2026 at 10:49 am
‘The King Will FALL’ Not before time…the sooner the better!👌😊
Hotel Bastardos
on February 18, 2026 at 10:54 am
The problem is that the royal family is an industry, with thousands of highly paid hangers on.
They won’t let their highly paid cushty gravy train come to an end any time soon. They’re imbedded everywhere in the UK at the highest levels.
sophie
on February 18, 2026 at 1:53 pm
Patriotism is ingrained in the English. It is systemic among us. And English royalty can be relied on to feed our patriotism; royalty is its bedrock; there is no other. And patriotism is intrinsically good.
Notice that royalty is known far more among the English than are, for instance, the members of Cabinet in any current government. It is the royals with whom we have emotional relationships: we hate Andrew and probably Charles. But we love Kathrine and William and their children, and Anne, the Princess Royal. And we certainly loved Queen Elizabeth II.
I do not know what will happen to Andrew. But I bet my bottom pound coin that he will not be doing jail time.
Anonymous: ‘Perhaps it’s time to reopen the Jack the Ripper file.’
Oh, come on! It was known in his own time that the Ripper was one of Queen Victoria’s sons. I’m sure you know that. 🙂 Nothing happened to the Ripper. He was not even caught. Andrew is small fry in comparison. He, too, will get away with his crimes. It will be quite a revolutionary event if he does not. But then, the English are not a revolting kind. (Pun intended.)
Jack the Ripper was Aaron Kosminski. A Polish Jewish immigrant.
The authorities in 1888 deemed it expedient not to fan the flames of racial antipathy amongst the indigenous Londoners by bringing him to book. A chalk message hastily scrubbed off by police near evidence of the murderers deed, before it could even be photographed, reported:
“The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.”
I resolved this case in my own mind years ago after reading: “Jack The Ripper And The Case For Scotland Yard’s Prime Suspect”, by Edward House; and “Naming Jack The Ripper, by Russell Edwards”. The BBC (spit), typically, in its documentary, “Jack The Ripper – The Case Reopened”, names Aaron Kosminski without mentioning his Jewish roots; but its analysis of where the killer radiated out for his kills – revealing the centre was where he lived – was excellent.
These three sources I link show: what the police thought; what DNA shows; and how modern criminologists have deduced how serial murderers often travel outwards from a central location.
And so while the establishment has covered up Kosminski’s guilt for over one hundred and thirty years, it still manages to disregard a major reason for the coverup at the time. That is to say, the societal problems that an immigrant murdering local people would have caused. This is an echo of the coverup of sexually abused young women in Rochdale in recent years.
when i first saw the pic of andrew and virginia
i thought my god she is so incredibly lovely what man would not want to be
loved by her some man get crazes on women who is unwise
but she was not the only one, andrew had dozens of underage girls sent to him by epstein
which is just awful
just as the BBC knew about the crimes of jimmy saville stephen fry freddie starr david frost trevor eve etc etc
so the king MUST have known what his brother was doing
dont forget Charles asked mossad to kill diana
MOSSAD SPY RING
jeffrey Epstein has been linked to israeli espionage, he gathered compromising information on public figures
to blackmail them, potentially working for Israeli intel
he used his connections and properties to collect sensitive information. by blackmail
the jews in our government helped him
Starmer Mandelson Streeting Miliband etc all part of undermining the UK and getting them to not speak of the gaza genocide
and to take the UK to war on iran and turkey for israel
see what dirty bastards jews are ?
The monarchy in England/Britain died during the reign of the Stuart monarchs. This was when feudalism gave way to international capital. Cromwell was bankrolled by “European” finance. Scotland’s MPs were brought off by “English” gold as per Robbie Burns while Marlborough (Churchill) sold out James II for gold to boot and changed sides.
The last of the Stuart monarchs, Queen Anne, had multiple miscarriages. One wonders whether this was entirely due to ill fortune. The incoming Hanoverians, led by George I, had a very weak claim to the British throne and got in because he was not a Catholic; but this facilitated the beginning of Hollywood kings and queens we have to this day.
So the monarchy died a long time ago. Charlie Windor is a costumed pantomime character.
***
In passing:
The Catholic v Protestantism was something I might say, “ a plague on both houses”. And yet Catholicism was more “original” Christianity stemming from Rome and its Empire. Protestantism was more Old Testament. Stephen Goodson in the “History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind,” speculates that one of the great movers of Protestantism in England – Thomas Cromwell, an ancestor of Oliver – had come into contact with the “Genoese” traders. The traders who were disproportionality Jewish – but not all – migrated from Italy to Iberia to Holland to England as commerce shifted from Italy to Western Europe because of the opening of the global sea lanes.
Jews hated Catholicism; a move toward a more Old Testament canon made way for the decriminalising of usury that Catholics indulged in, but more hypocritically. (This is a rather nuanced subject. I do not believe lending at interest is wrong in itself. There are a few shades of grey in all of this.)
Been going on for years… even since ‘American Jezebel’ Koo Stark was prancing naked around the Palace being pursued (I have it on good ‘inside authority”) by none other than Randy Andy and the current King…
not that I blame either of them given the horse-face “strumpets” usually on offer from the Bwitish Awistocwacy! 😏
If it is true that the whole Epstein thing was a Mossad operation to blackmail leaders then I guess the fate of Prince Andrew and others may depends on how much they do what is desired of them from the tribe behind the operation.
There can be little doubt that the entire Royal Family knew what was going on (perversion, financial corruption), even if they didn’t participate directly themselves. And it’s not a new phenomenon either. Perhaps it’s time to reopen the Jack the Ripper file.
The most interesting question is why so much is now being disclosed – by which I mean not Epstein, but earlier scandals. Up until a certain point, everything was suppressed. Then suddenly, the entire media was free to print. Why? Answer – because you can’t have a monarchy in the globalist state. The British love affair with the monarchy must be broken. Then the ‘royals’ can retire into private life yet still remain as wealthy string pullers. In Europe, all the monarchies have effectively been done away with (the Netherlands is the best example). Only the British monarchy remains, and that has to go.
BBC savaged as ‘state propaganda channel for perverts ‘ after latest royal coverage
Story by Jasmine Care
The BBC has been criticised for their latest royal coverage after it were accused of not reporting enough on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the Epstein files. Over the last few weeks, Andrew has dominated royal coverage across the UK, with his name cropping up several times in the Epstein files.
While this does not indicate any wrongdoing, and Andrew denies accusations against him, the files have shown how close Andrew and the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein once were. Although the BBC have run stories on the Epstein files, most believe they have not covered the spying element enough.
This appears to be the view of political journalist Steph Brawn, who wrote in The National that the BBC are covering the rest of the Royal Family news as if nothing has happened. The BBC has been criticised for their latest royal coverage after it were accused of not reporting enough on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the Epstein files. Over the last few weeks, Andrew has dominated royal coverage across the UK, with his name cropping up several times in the Epstein spy files.
While this does not indicate any wrongdoing, and Andrew denies accusations against him, the files have shown how close Andrew and the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein once were.
This appears to be the view of political journalist Steph Brawn, who wrote in The National that the BBC are covering the rest of the Royal Family news as if nothing has happened.
She wrote: “In fact, if you look at the stories the BBC has done on King Charles recently, there is actually a headline of ‘Heckler booed the King as he visits Lancashire’.
Brawn also said: “This approach from the BBC which appears to protect the Royal Family is increasingly looking out-of-touch with the public.
“Yes, there are plenty of negative headlines about Mountbatten-Windsor himself – such as US lawmakers saying he needs to testify – but it feels as if there is then a huge blind spot when all you see about the rest of the institution he was a part of his whole life is smiles, the odd bit of charity work, and William trying out a lightweight mobility scooter.”
The article also included a post on X by Mark Curtis, who wrote: “The BBC’s coverage of William is as you’d expect from any national state propaganda channel.”
The royals are at the top of the deeply ingrained British class system so it will probably take time to abolish them, but I think eventually (next century perhaps) they will be dissolved. I think two things will help us toward that end.
If the US and Israel attack Iran and Iran does as it says and targets Arab monarchies and brings them down (and they are brutal to some of their own people) this would shake our own monarchy and make them realise they can fall too. But I think their bigger problem may be that because we have exceedingly rich people now up to billionaires, they are becoming the new royalty as far as some governments are concerned. Royal bloodlines are useful figureheads but ever more quaint and in time the whims of the uber-wealthy will be prioritised over royal wants and needs.
Perhaps Charles has been so friendly to the invaders from West Asia and the Middle East because he thinks they will accept him as their king in Britain, replacing the Britons who no longer do.
Maybe the idea is to bring them in, put them to work to keep the tax money flowing, and hope all the pesky white people who have concepts and beliefs that are far too sophisticated for their new peasant status will die out.
It looks like the monarchy doesn’t care all that much if the public finds out about its evil deeds. It only cares when the public starts doing something about them. It was time to start back when Princess Diana lost her life. Now Britain is at it’s last chance.
Releasing some email and other documents tells us very little about the actual blackmail and what the entrapped perps were made to do and for whom. That is what the citizenry has a right to know but the US intel refuses to disclose anything of any real relevance. Why that is relevant is because the evidence does clearly indicate that Trump was a part of a blackmail operation and that his administration likely is being blackmailed to start a war with Iran. It stands to reason that the Rothschild dynasty which from its inception always had superior intel from its agents, even greater than that of the UK, and whom Epstein was more directly working for than with the Mossad (according to his own alleged admissions in the emails), that it is most likely that dynasty is in total control of the Trump administration and likely other governments. Most likely in having no chagrin in using Epstein and Mossad operatives, it also has used its own spooks and intel for blackmail and to be able to concentrate and consolidate such vast wealth and power under its control over the past 200 years.
Its well over due the fake-jew crew in Windsor are kicked the F out, and confiscate all their private trust assets while your at it.
The Tribe now rules England. The Tribe in The City of London, the financial throne. From there, to the Zionist International and its conquest of the West, of which the Epstein/Maxwell is but a part of the whole and the whole seeks more than Greater Israel. It will do what was done to the Palestinians, to the destruction of Germany, the destruction of the neighboring countries to Israel and.. behold what it did to assassinate Kennedy and other American politicians, to the World Trade Center, to enlist America to wage wars on its behalf.
There is the evil, the rot and the moral corruption, and the Epstein/Maxwells will work in the sewers they inhabit, breed themselves to be in the service to the Tribe, the Zionist International, which take the form of individual fanatics, to the enormously well-financed organizations such as Mossad, AIPAC, et al, as well as the infiltration into governmental laws, academia, entertainment, media… on and on. A conquest by military, by subversion, sabotage and provocateurs.
Is there any definitive writing on who, what and why is ‘royalty’ in the English socio-political context?
I have picked up bits and pieces, such as that English royalty is christened in the Church of England (Good!)
The interesting bit is that the royals are said to work. Work, whatever it is, is productive. In what ways is a royal’s work productive? Does it merit the pay given by treasury for it?
But then, this might be quite the wrong questions. It would probably be better to wonder whether we simply like the royals to be in place; we like them. Britain would not be Britain without them.
Ah, that is it! Our patriotism drives us. And that is mega-good.
The film, The Emerald Forest, which is a dramatization of a true story, tells of the abduction of the son of an engineer, party to the wrecking of the rain forests of Brazil, by an aboriginal tribe.
The engineer spends ten years trying to locate his son until he eventually finds him, living happily with the natives in the Amazon jungle. He pleads with his son to return home with him but his son doesn’t want to. His son is free and loves living in the arboreal paradise.
In his frustration at his son’s unresponsiveness,the engineer appeals to the Chief of the tribe,
“You’re the Chief. You tell him what to do.”
The old Chief replies,
“I wouldn’t be Chief for very long if I told people what to do.”
I wouldn’t be Chief for very long, if I told people what to do. Now, that’s kingship.
Fallout from Epstein and Mandelsons spy ring puts Britain’s House of Lords under scrutiny
Story by Jill Lawless •Britain House of Lords:
Fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein files has landed on the gilded wood and plush red benches of Britain’s House of Lords.
Just who was on the take ?
Parliament’s upper chamber is in the spotlight after former U.K. ambassador to Washington Peter Mandelson was forced to resign as a member of the Lords because of his perversions and spying for mossad
The episode has emboldened critics who say the unelected house is antiquated, undemocratic and far too slow at punishing bad behavior by its members. Supporters say the chamber of more than 850 members-for-life who sport the titles of “Lord” or “Lady” is an unwieldy but essential part of parliamentary democracy.Almost everyone agrees it needs reform, but that task has eluded successive governments.
With the epstein revelations how is starmer still in office ?
more
Lords-a-misbehaving
Long gone are the days when out-of-favor lords could be imprisoned in the Tower of London or beheaded for treason,
Until recently there was little parliamentary authorities could do about those who commit ethical breaches or crimes.
But the photos of Mandelson and Epstein taking Starmer to the “pleasure island ” was sickening
A postman gave his story to the papers that he would deliver from Harrods, nappies for Mandelson
Lord Archer of Weston-Super-Mare, otherwise known as the thriller-writer Jeffrey Archer, was imprisoned for perjury in 2001, while Lord Black of Crossharbour — the media baron Conrad Black — served a U.S. prison sentence after a 2007 fraud conviction. Under the rules of the time, neither could be kicked out of the Lords.
Since then, the law has been changed to allow members to be expelled for breaching the Lords code of conduct, imprisonment or non-attendance. To this day, no one has been expelled for bad behavior, though a couple have quit before being kicked out, including one who committed sexual assault and another filmed allegedly snorting cocaine with sex workers and Wes streeting using young rent boys
something starmer has done for years
‘The King Will FALL’ Not before time…the sooner the better!👌😊
The problem is that the royal family is an industry, with thousands of highly paid hangers on.
They won’t let their highly paid cushty gravy train come to an end any time soon. They’re imbedded everywhere in the UK at the highest levels.
Patriotism is ingrained in the English. It is systemic among us. And English royalty can be relied on to feed our patriotism; royalty is its bedrock; there is no other. And patriotism is intrinsically good.
Notice that royalty is known far more among the English than are, for instance, the members of Cabinet in any current government. It is the royals with whom we have emotional relationships: we hate Andrew and probably Charles. But we love Kathrine and William and their children, and Anne, the Princess Royal. And we certainly loved Queen Elizabeth II.
I do not know what will happen to Andrew. But I bet my bottom pound coin that he will not be doing jail time.
Anonymous: ‘Perhaps it’s time to reopen the Jack the Ripper file.’
Oh, come on! It was known in his own time that the Ripper was one of Queen Victoria’s sons. I’m sure you know that. 🙂 Nothing happened to the Ripper. He was not even caught. Andrew is small fry in comparison. He, too, will get away with his crimes. It will be quite a revolutionary event if he does not. But then, the English are not a revolting kind. (Pun intended.)
Jack the Ripper was Aaron Kosminski. A Polish Jewish immigrant.
The authorities in 1888 deemed it expedient not to fan the flames of racial antipathy amongst the indigenous Londoners by bringing him to book. A chalk message hastily scrubbed off by police near evidence of the murderers deed, before it could even be photographed, reported:
“The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.”
I resolved this case in my own mind years ago after reading: “Jack The Ripper And The Case For Scotland Yard’s Prime Suspect”, by Edward House; and “Naming Jack The Ripper, by Russell Edwards”. The BBC (spit), typically, in its documentary, “Jack The Ripper – The Case Reopened”, names Aaron Kosminski without mentioning his Jewish roots; but its analysis of where the killer radiated out for his kills – revealing the centre was where he lived – was excellent.
These three sources I link show: what the police thought; what DNA shows; and how modern criminologists have deduced how serial murderers often travel outwards from a central location.
And so while the establishment has covered up Kosminski’s guilt for over one hundred and thirty years, it still manages to disregard a major reason for the coverup at the time. That is to say, the societal problems that an immigrant murdering local people would have caused. This is an echo of the coverup of sexually abused young women in Rochdale in recent years.