there is a lot of talk in turkey just now
they know they are in israels cross hairs
they can join iran against israel now
or have to stand alone after
Ellis C Taylor
on August 15, 2025 at 9:46 am
just dont drag us into it
Britain has become a laughing stock
” nero fiddled while rome burned ”
starmer is nobbing young rent boys while the country being burnt by migrants”
the people have had enough
Amalek
on August 15, 2025 at 12:27 pm
I always enjoy listening to Patrick, and once again he did not disappoint.
Doesn’t look like he’s on with UK Column today.
Too bad.
antiJHWH
on August 15, 2025 at 7:14 pm
@ ELLIS C TAYLOR
your society is rotten through the core by
centuries of perverted leaders,kings,lords –
and this perversion spread down to lowest
classes . do you expect salvation from a
degenerated society ?
grimsson
on August 15, 2025 at 8:17 pm
Well then Rikson, why wasn’t my post debunking the Hiroshima bomb published ? What’s up isn’t it allowed then? Or maybe you would prefare it if I wrote an article for TTS with photos outlining my theoy better.
Rixon Stewart
on August 15, 2025 at 8:55 pm
I don’trecall receiving any such post. Are you sure you posted it?
” On this piece of makov trash Dr Hoopers one word comment probably says it all.
BUT, Why I’m really here is to pass comment on makovs bombing of Hiroshima article (wasn’t online for a few days when posted).
Have you ever noticed when anyone mentions it the building at ground zero is ALWAYS mentioned in the first sentence, to draw ones gaze to the building itself and therefore pull ones eyes from the full picture therefore maintaining the did it; didn’t it happen senario.
For a change look at the immediate surroundings. look at the trees next to the buildings, blackened yes, merely conversant to the firebombing of a wooden city (of which there is plenty of evidence). Now compere to photos of wooded ares that have suffered from conventional weapon attacks during the 1st, second world wars or even the Arclight bombings in Vietnam, Trees are ALWAYS shattered and ripped to pieces with only trunks or partial trunks left standing. So tell me have the trees, on which even small twigs; let alone branches are still extant at point zero really suffered from an eye burning flash, sereing heat and then a mega blast from above, a trees weakest point. I think not.
Not only that but look at the bush in the central middle ground. Not only has it not been completely flattened by the blast it has not even been burned and still has has leaves on it. So no Hiroshima wasn’t “nuked” or if it was then the bomb didn’t work.as wouldn’t any theory based on spurious einsteinian mathematics.
Hiroshima was firebombed. All the evidence is out there online. Have a look.”
***
This article and the other are by people called Patrick. I think that’s why you couldn’t track it.
In fairness to RS, he is pretty good at letting people have their say. I have noticed there is an occasional article in the scroll at the top that he sometimes mislays when demoted to the older listings. On occasion I have wondered if I have been censored, but it is usually because we forget where we posted. And sometimes, again in fairness to RS, people are impatient for their post to become live.
But I have reposted because it it beyond a joke that more people aren’t querying Hiroshima.
Robert Faurisson used to say WRT to Auschwitz, “No holes, no holocaust”. In the case of Hiroshima, “No 1945 atom bomb, no nukes.”
Why do people still believe?
They believe because they are repeaters, not truth-seekers. They believe what they are told to believe.
The TTS website is in an orbit with the likes of Henry Makow – an often informative writer – and others in the “approved” alternative media. Their combined gravitational pull with other competent media producers nevertheless creates a kind of “alternative” consensus, maybe also nurtured by a few timid academics and revenue earning “truthers” for whom “no nukes” would threaten their pocket. I am noticing the same in Egyptology where the older alternative voices have become the new orthodoxy, but are being challenged by Geoffrey Drumm, whom I believe is a genius.
RS has said that he reserves his opinions on the existence of nukes, so he may be moving in the right direction. But I’m sure he like anyone of us here likes to to arrive at his own conclusions. People can’t be bullied so much. The individual has to feel that inner movement; that moment of humility when the whole world changes in an instance because of an important realisation from within that can no longer deny the reality without.
there is a lot of talk in turkey just now
they know they are in israels cross hairs
they can join iran against israel now
or have to stand alone after
just dont drag us into it
Britain has become a laughing stock
” nero fiddled while rome burned ”
starmer is nobbing young rent boys while the country being burnt by migrants”
the people have had enough
I always enjoy listening to Patrick, and once again he did not disappoint.
Doesn’t look like he’s on with UK Column today.
Too bad.
@ ELLIS C TAYLOR
your society is rotten through the core by
centuries of perverted leaders,kings,lords –
and this perversion spread down to lowest
classes . do you expect salvation from a
degenerated society ?
Well then Rikson, why wasn’t my post debunking the Hiroshima bomb published ? What’s up isn’t it allowed then? Or maybe you would prefare it if I wrote an article for TTS with photos outlining my theoy better.
I don’trecall receiving any such post. Are you sure you posted it?
@Grimsson
You posted it here:
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=313618
” On this piece of makov trash Dr Hoopers one word comment probably says it all.
BUT, Why I’m really here is to pass comment on makovs bombing of Hiroshima article (wasn’t online for a few days when posted).
Have you ever noticed when anyone mentions it the building at ground zero is ALWAYS mentioned in the first sentence, to draw ones gaze to the building itself and therefore pull ones eyes from the full picture therefore maintaining the did it; didn’t it happen senario.
For a change look at the immediate surroundings. look at the trees next to the buildings, blackened yes, merely conversant to the firebombing of a wooden city (of which there is plenty of evidence). Now compere to photos of wooded ares that have suffered from conventional weapon attacks during the 1st, second world wars or even the Arclight bombings in Vietnam, Trees are ALWAYS shattered and ripped to pieces with only trunks or partial trunks left standing. So tell me have the trees, on which even small twigs; let alone branches are still extant at point zero really suffered from an eye burning flash, sereing heat and then a mega blast from above, a trees weakest point. I think not.
Not only that but look at the bush in the central middle ground. Not only has it not been completely flattened by the blast it has not even been burned and still has has leaves on it. So no Hiroshima wasn’t “nuked” or if it was then the bomb didn’t work.as wouldn’t any theory based on spurious einsteinian mathematics.
Hiroshima was firebombed. All the evidence is out there online. Have a look.”
***
This article and the other are by people called Patrick. I think that’s why you couldn’t track it.
In fairness to RS, he is pretty good at letting people have their say. I have noticed there is an occasional article in the scroll at the top that he sometimes mislays when demoted to the older listings. On occasion I have wondered if I have been censored, but it is usually because we forget where we posted. And sometimes, again in fairness to RS, people are impatient for their post to become live.
But I have reposted because it it beyond a joke that more people aren’t querying Hiroshima.
Robert Faurisson used to say WRT to Auschwitz, “No holes, no holocaust”. In the case of Hiroshima, “No 1945 atom bomb, no nukes.”
Why do people still believe?
They believe because they are repeaters, not truth-seekers. They believe what they are told to believe.
The TTS website is in an orbit with the likes of Henry Makow – an often informative writer – and others in the “approved” alternative media. Their combined gravitational pull with other competent media producers nevertheless creates a kind of “alternative” consensus, maybe also nurtured by a few timid academics and revenue earning “truthers” for whom “no nukes” would threaten their pocket. I am noticing the same in Egyptology where the older alternative voices have become the new orthodoxy, but are being challenged by Geoffrey Drumm, whom I believe is a genius.
RS has said that he reserves his opinions on the existence of nukes, so he may be moving in the right direction. But I’m sure he like anyone of us here likes to to arrive at his own conclusions. People can’t be bullied so much. The individual has to feel that inner movement; that moment of humility when the whole world changes in an instance because of an important realisation from within that can no longer deny the reality without.