Iranian centrifuges used to enrich unranium
Nick Kollerstrom – Terror on the Tube June 19, 2025
Iran has invoked the present conflict, by its continual enrichment of uranium. The ongoing enrichment process is irrational, i.e. it has no purpose, UNLESS Iran may intend to build nukes – unless it wants to leave open the option, of building nukes.
It has a GROWING stockpile of 60% enriched uranium (i.e. with 60% of the fissile isotope, that will go bang). A bomb needs a minimum of 70% for the explosive chain reaction to take place.
This dreadful conflict could have been avoided, if Iran had taken the White House directive:
“Iran has to give up its program in a way that the entire world can see,” Waltz said. “It is time for Iran to walk away completely from its desire to have a nuclear weapon.”
If Iran means what it has been saying for decades, that it does not want nukes, then it could easily show that by having NO uranium enriched above 3% – or 5% as upper limit, as required for civilian use.
That would then be VISIBLE for the entire world to see -if they could simply say, Our uranium is below 5%, while above 70% is required for military use. Instead of that, Iran has seemed to want the machismo of continually wanting to show that it can do the enrichment. Why?
‘We have a perfect right to do this’, they say, and of course that is correct. As a general comment, the world does not want two hostile nations near to each other with nukes, which gives a very short launch-on-warning, use-‘em-or-lose ’em scenario which is inherently unstable, giving each side about five minutes decision time. That’s why it has always been commendable that Iran has said it doesn’t want them.
Iran has been occupying the worst possible position, of not having nukes BUT keeping an option open. This war started THE DAY AFTER an angry IAEA report, accusing Iran of non-compliance in the matter of uranium enrichment. Iran seems to view its ever-continuing uranium enrichment as if it were some sort of negotiating chip, that it might agree to renounce it if, for example, sanctions against it were lifted.
The meaning and purpose of a nuclear program is shown NOT by the words of politicians, but by the process that is materially going on. ‘Undue’ enrichment means the IAEA inspectors are continually suspicious, so they keep wanting further inspections, LEADING TO the suspicion that the info they glean will be leaked to the US/Israel for its where-to-bomb decisions – such as assuredly did happen in the case of Iraq years ago.
One must agree with the Russian view that:
“Iran, like all other countries, has the right to develop the peaceful atomic sector and peaceful nuclear energy and is taking important steps in this direction. And all this is happening in strict accordance with international law.”
But, that isn’t quite the point, is it? It had a ‘right’ to do what it has been doing – which has led to the war.
Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of National Intelligence, has said that the stockpile of 60% enriched uranium in Iran is ‘unprecedented’ in magnitude – though, she added, it is not ‘currently’ building a bomb. Let’s quote an informed source:
“Iran currently enriches uranium to 60% purity, in large quantities, and possesses the capacity to enrich that stockpile to 90% in 1-3 weeks. That capability is by far the most expensive industrial project in Iran’s history, one that Iran has prioritized above all other spending for 25 years, in opposition to the explicit desires of more than 70% of its own people, according to the regime’s own polling. Nuclear power generation requires 3.7% purity. There is no known use of 60% enriched uranium other than the creation of nuclear weapons.”
Does that enrichment process keep going merely because no politician has the resolve to stop it? It has already caused war to break out, and soon huge bunker-busting US bombs may endeavour to break up the deep-underground centrifuge machines. Iran has a choice, of continuing with its machismo posture of ‘we’ve got as right do this’ – or, move in the direction of world peace by diluting that enriched uranium.
Iran has stated and maintained its view that America is the ‘great Satan’ and ditto that it hopes Israel will ‘fade from the pages of history’ – immediately re-phrased by Israel as, It wants to wipe Israel off the map (as recently stated by Nigel Farage). Given these unfriendly positions it needs to be all the more careful in expressing its nuclear-weapons posture.
How much oil does iran have? How much oil does the yid control in the middle east? It just so happens that iran has the next largest amount that the yid doesn’t already control. If iran wants to get the yid off its back, all it needs to do is to hand over all of its oil. If the middle east wants to get the yid off their collective backs, all they need to do is to obliterate the yid. Everything else is just noise – a yid show for the “voters” and their multi-coloured offspring.
Impressing with figures, are we!? What a ridiculous piece!
Hiroshima was napalm carpet-bonbed.
It should be obvious since long.
So old Nick is playing the one side here.
Ridiculous!
Yes more lies. Iran enriched upto the point of providing for its nuclear power program, medical needs, and research.
No one, not even Nutanyahu, has stated that Iran has enriched to weapons grade Fissile material.
The Nazis have always said ‘could, or soon, or two months time’, and EVERY US NAZI intel report says there’s ZERO evidence that Iran is even close to building a bomb, and Clearly, NK is a Joo loving Nazi, like so many on here. I said it the other day, even sheeple who post negative Joo comments, they are secret Nazis, because, there’s no such thing, as bad media. Even NaziTubers will tell you that negative comments are better than no comments, because the algorithms love regular uploads, and all interactions, good and bad, help the channel, and it’s the same on a site like this one.
If we go back to the days of the Shah, the. CIA aided the then regime, with its nuclear program, because even with its oil and gas reserves, it required nuclear power, it’s a bigger fecking country than Nazi UK, by land area, or population!! The need nuclear power, that’s a fact.
The fact Iran has at least two Soviet era nukes, has nothing to do with Iran. The Soviet Union collapsed and nukes were everywhere on the black market.
Until recently, the Nazi IAEA had free access to all of Irans nuclear sites, and nothing was out of order. Iran was in full compliance.
Of course, as soon as I reached a bullshit paragraph, I stopped reading NKs article, but I wonder, does NK mention that the IAEA has helped Joolandia with targeting Iranian nuclear facilties on the ground, and even sent the Joos damage reports???? <NK?
I've always wondered, or not, why NK was so interested in 'Keep 9/11 Going', which was a Nazi deep state operation, dominated by Joos? Keeping the legend alive is all good Nazi work.
Even Paul Watson who gets his shit posted on here, his site Propagandamatrix, a sister site of Prison Planet, used to perpetually post up bullshit articles about 9/11, just to suck in, the less well informed.
Nico X has gone, but long live Nico X, because he, it, bot, is still here.
While Wikipedia can be a good starting point, one should never use any claimed fact to be true, unless it's verified by several credible sources. This is almost impossible to do, as 80% of everything online is highly suspect, and it's got much worse with AI.
You need intuition, I mean serious, decades developed intuition, and the ability to discard monumentle mountains of crap, before you'll find anything worth considering.
Bilderberg.org, highly suspect, and infiltrated, Propagandamatrix, deep state, Prison Planet, very dodgy, and I never liked Alex Jones. UKcolumn, toxic BBC parody, 21CenturyWire (name may have changed) and Patrick Henningsen, banned me for asking how he was funded. I know he supposedly had a wealthy backer, with his flash site, and international travel, so again, 20ft barge pole. There are many others, that are very dubious. Most of the alternative space is full of Nazi shit. Some of the worst are the Duran, & Redacted.
Even on here, you are in the Nazi swamp. That's life, you just need to know it.
You can’t demand of Iran what you didn’t demand of Israel. That’s the plain fact. Sure no nukes would be great. But in the real world if Iran gave its option for a nuclear deterrent Iran knows it would cease to exist because Israel, with the help of the US, UK, France, Germany plus outsiders would oversee it’s demise. Don’t blame Iran, blame the bandits of the West who want control of Iran’s oil reserves.
Thank god you are back NIK
we missed yoiu
your common sense is very welcome
N Korea did offer iran its nukes but they refused
From the link…
“The annual US intelligence threat assessment report published on 25 March says Iran is not currently building a nuclear weapon, according to a copy of the document reviewed by Reuters…”
As if we can trust US intelligence and Reuters,,,
Kollerstrom IMO is taking a false premise and building upon it to showcase his cleverness like many who claim to see the emperor’s new clothes that the echo chambers of the mainstream media provides.
As a philosopher of science he should know he is building Ptolemaic epicycles in a universe not centred on the nation state per se. And maybe there is also a certain intellectual cowardice in not venturing to explore the nuke legend, although Kollerstrom has certainly shown bravery in critiquing 7/7 – I salute him for this.
I further make the observation that the “alternative crowd” have gradually formed about themselves a new orthodoxy. They speak on each other shows, feature one each other’s websites, forming in their own minds a sense of being the “official opposition” . Unfortunately they are often the echo chamber and useful idiots of the old orthodoxy. They are often clever but miss that essential sense of discerning real motives that some of us with an exposure to politics have developed.
Yes, of course, Iran wants to avert nuclear war but she is dead against starting one. The threat comes from Israel with hundreds of nuclear warheads pointing in her direction, largely because Iran aims to save the Palestinians and other nations from bombing, blockade, theft, starvation and annihilation by the Messianic Genocidal Zionists. The object of enriching Uranium close to atomic bomb capability is to deter the aggressor (just as most nuclear countries claim to do). The latest attacks prove the necessity of that build-up. The Zionists have been itching to destroy Iran and her support for the people in the way of its expansion and domination plans for decades. It would be no good appealing to the international community it only had a civil nuclear programme. That would not deter the Zionists but give them a green light. Hopefully, Trump’s call for dialogue will give the country time to achieve reciprocity before it is further devastated as Iraq, Libya, Syria and most of Palestine have been.
OR ( as you imply) if Iran had nukes then Talmudia would never have attacked them & the war wouldn’t be happening..If Pakistan had given Iraq a few nukes then Bush wouldn’t have attacked & destroyed them
It’s a bit lol..enriched, though isn’t it..being dictated to by a rogue state that has secretly stashed supposed nooks and isn’t a signatory to the NPT…
It’s like being lectured on equine husbandry by an imbecile that makes dog meat…
The Iranians have far too much resource and live in a far too strategic landmass..they have to accept ze freedumbs and demockracy… and become pornhub vassals..
So it doesn’t really matter what percentage of supposed fissile material they possess..because that’s just a cover story..
There are no ‘nuclear’ bombs. It’s another psyop that has its roots in the book ‘The World set free’. written by H.G. Wells in 1914. Yes that H.G. Wells who was promoted by the same criminals who backed the fraudster Albert Einstein.
You really need to understand the protocols to see through it all, but sadly few will. The brainwashing is too complete. You should also learn some basic physics. It all helps.
Nuclear weapons are real they say.
Nuclear-powered ships, such as submarines and aircraft carriers, can operate for many years without needing refueling due to the efficiency of their nuclear reactors. Unlike conventional ships that require refueling every few weeks or months, nuclear reactors can run for 20 to 25 years on a single fuel load. This is because the nuclear fuel, typically uranium, undergoes fission, releasing a significant amount of energy over an extended period. The design of nuclear reactors allows for a compact fuel core that generates heat to produce steam, which drives turbines for propulsion. This means that nuclear-powered vessels do not need to carry large amounts of fuel, freeing up space for cargo and other essential supplies. Additionally, the long operational intervals reduce the logistical challenges and risks associated with frequent refueling, making nuclear ships more efficient for extended missions at sea. Overall, the advanced technology behind nuclear propulsion enables these vessels to maintain prolonged operations, making them invaluable for military and commercial applications.
The first nuclear-powered ship, the Soviet icebreaker Lenin, was commissioned in 1959. This groundbreaking vessel, with a dead-weight tonnage of 20,000, marked a significant advancement in marine technology. The Lenin served for 30 years, undergoing reactor upgrades in 1970, before being retired in 1989 due to hull wear from ice abrasion. In the same year, the United States launched the NS Savannah, the world’s first nuclear-powered merchant ship. Launched on July 21, 1959, and powered up in 1961, the Savannah was a pioneering vessel in commercial nuclear propulsion, showcasing the potential for nuclear energy in maritime transport. These innovations paved the way for future nuclear-powered vessels, including submarines and aircraft carriers, highlighting the advantages of nuclear propulsion, such as extended operational range and reduced refueling needs. The legacy of these early nuclear ships continues to influence naval engineering today.
So the Yanks invented the nuclear bomb before nuclear power was invented.
I doubt Hiroshima and Nagasaki were nuclear bombs, and I’m not convinced we have nuclear bombs today.
But oh boy is the nuclear myth useful for starting 21st century wars.
Whether Israel has got them or not, Israel has failed to deter Iran.
But apparently Israel always gets what it wants because everyone is scared of Israel’s Samson option.
Its all BS. I love the photo below headline showing some bogus ‘Iranian centrifuges used to enrich uranium’….lol… I wonder if the Iranians designed that phony prop themselves, or if it was delivered to them by the US or Israel?
Its all a psyop/pretext to start some staged war–a repeat of the Saddam formula, but instead of fictitious WMDs now its fantasy ‘nuclear weapons’–of course both ‘sides’ (USrael-Israel/Iran) are in on the Truman Show episode/conspiracy, just as Saddam was a donmeh mole, so is the Ayatollah.
Iran has stressed time and time again its enrichment policy is entirely peaceful, can be proven and needs no permission or lectures from anyone and I’m surprised at N Kollerstrom’s ignorance in taking the side of a President who supports a mass murderer and who has openly called for war against Iran and the assassination of its Leader!
Or, perhaps, it’s all grand guignol theatre, a stage-managed horror show, for the delectation of the petrified masses.
We know from the works of
• Dr. John Colema – “Palestine: A 7000 Year History.”
• Stephen Dorril – “Inside The Covert World Of Her Majesty’s Secret Intelligence Service.”
• Mark Curtis – “Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion With Radical Islam”
that The Muslim Brotherhood was created in 1929 in Cairo by MI6. The Muslim Brotherhood is a freemasonic entity. Its military wing, Hamas, are likewise “Widow’s Sons.”
The Ayatollah Khomeini was the son of a British petroleum executive, freemason and MI6 asset, Richard Williamson. At the behest of MI6, Williamson “converted” to Islam and his son was primed for his future role. The Iranian parliament is a pyramid, featuring 33 windows. (I’m indebted to the commenter Anonymous 102 for the latter information, posted at Kevin Barrett’s most recent article at the Unz Review.)
They’re all colluding with one another. Apocalypse Tao.
It looks like blaming the victim of mugging for getting robbed because they’ve got money. It doesn’t matter what Iran does: the Yankee Empire is on the warpath against them for some reason. If it wasn’t one thing it would be another that they would be faux outaged against.
Nick – if Iran is to give up its enrichment then so should israel as well as decommissioning its nuclear bombs. Iran has every right to develop its bomb. It has signed the NPT for heavens sake (israel and usa not), the un inspectors confirm no evidence of enrichment to 90 for the bomb not 60%. Again all falsehoods been written in msm about Iran.. it is the usual one law me and and another for thee. there has been no ww reaction to what israel has done in terms of flouting international law on many fronts in regard to attacking Iran – yet the west sits on its hands whilst blasting Iran.
Well said Truther.
Take a look at that picture. Forget the “centrifuges” (or whatever they are/are supposed to be). Look at the rest of the room. What does it look like? It looks like a museum to me. Or a hotel room. What’s with the curtained windows? And the plinths the whatever they are are standing on? Then there’s the flags on the left. Why, if this plinth filled and curtained room is for “enrichment” would they have a couple of flags there? And then, behind the flags is a huge printed something telling the “scientists” all about the “exhibit”. LOFL.
@Antiochus
True, it looks like set props from an old 1970’s Tom Baker Dr. Who set. By the way, do you know if Baker was a Jew?
Antiochus.great observation.if it’s that simple,i can enrich my own uranium in my living room.some metal cilinders and centrifuge away to my own little A -bomb.
be prepared for a jewish false flag (its all jewish!)
in that case in all northern nations the people
should first slaughter their ruling traitors !
drag them out of their parliaments !
NK is writing outwrithe lies. The weapon grade enrichment is not 70% but 90+%. The practical use for 60% enriched uranium is fuel for a nuclear reactor of a nuclear driven submarine.