Ethnic Russians in Donbass, December 31, 2023
Strategic Culture – Feb 28, 2025
This week marks the third anniversary of Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, launched on February 24, 2022.
Moscow has consistently explained the conflict in Ukraine to be a manifestation of a bigger geopolitical confrontation brought about by U.S. and NATO aggression using Ukraine as a proxy. That aggression was latent for decades going back to the end of the Second World War.
Russia’s emerging military victory against a NeoNazi regime armed to the teeth by an array of Western enemies has not just defeated a nefarious proxy war. It is demolishing the charade of supposed Western moral authority. This is an epoch-making watershed. It is significant that this event comes at a time when U.S. and Western global power is failing and flailing, and a new multipolar order is evolving, one where Russia’s international esteem and influence are increasing.
The United States, its European allies and the Western corporate-controlled news media have tried to depict Ukraine as an innocent victim of “unprovoked Russian aggression”.
Three years on, the Western narrative has collapsed in a pile of propaganda lies. The United States, under the new administration of President Donald Trump, has abandoned the erstwhile claims made against Russia. This week, the United States tabled a resolution at the United Nations Security Council which calls for peace in Ukraine and refrained from accusing Russia of aggression.
As many as one million Ukrainian soldiers have been killed over the past three years on the battlefield. Russia has not disclosed how many of its troops have died. Some estimates put the death toll at around 100,000.
The conflict in Ukraine is the biggest on the European continent since the end of World War II. It is a tragedy of epic proportion, especially given that the conflict could have been avoided by diplomacy.
The Trump administration is now pushing for peace negotiations with Russia. The American president has also acknowledged some of the “root causes” of the conflict, namely the provocative and unacceptable idea of Ukraine joining the NATO alliance advocated by his predecessor, and the longer-term threat posed by NATO’s expansion toward Russia’s borders since the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s.
In other words, the U.S. administration has now moved to a point for diplomacy that the previous Biden White House rejected.
It is important to recall that in the weeks before hostilities erupted at the end of February 2022, Moscow had presented a detailed and comprehensive proposal for a mutual security treaty between Russia and the U.S.-led NATO military alliance. That diplomatic initiative was dismissed by Washington and its European allies. The rejection of negotiations made the conflict and the ensuing death and destruction inevitable. That is a diabolical shame on the heads of the Western powers.
In our weekly editorial on February 25, 2022, it was stated: “Moscow had warned that if its reasonable security proposals were not reciprocated, then there would be ‘military-technical measures’. Having exhausted the initiative for dialogue and mutual respect, the next phase is the use of more ‘physical language’ to convey meaning to people who seem unresponsive to normal dialogue. It is the Western powers and their arrogant presumption of superiority that are responsible for the impasse and now the repercussions.”
Russia was fully justified in taking military action against NATO’s relentless threats. The conflict was never about merely Ukraine, it was about facing down the entire U.S.-led Western bloc and its incorrigible aggression towards Russia.
Again, in our editorial from three years ago we stated: “Russia has for years warned that U.S. and NATO aggression was posing a critical danger to international security and had to stop. The revoking of arms control treaties by the U.S. (the ABM, INF, Open Skies Treaty) and the expansion of missile threats near Russia’s borders were no longer tolerable. Ukraine is really just one element of the bigger picture. But this week, Russia has moved finally to stop the aggression. It is a historic watershed.”
This week, Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed hope that sanity and diplomacy may prevail under the Trump administration to negotiate a peace settlement in Ukraine. Putin also warned of the danger that diplomacy could be sabotaged by Western powers who would rather that their proxy war against Russia continues – no matter how many deaths it inflicts nor the risks of all-out nuclear war.
It is not clear if the Trump administration can be a reliable party. Trump this week extended economic sanctions on Russia for another year – which is not a good sign. Yes, he has expressed recognition of Russia’s deep concerns but this American president is fickle and mercurial. He seems prone to flip-flopping on his positions. Last week, he called Ukraine’s expired president, Vladimir Zelensky, a “dictator” (which is arguably correct). But this week, Trump denied the disparagement while inking a major mining deal with Zelensky in Washington.
Let’s not forget, too, that Trump during his first administration was complicit in instigating war when in 2019 he approved Javelin missiles to the Ukrainian regime – the first time the taboo of supplying lethal weapons was broken. Trump also ripped up the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty and the Open Skies Treaty, gravely provoking tensions with Russia.
Fair enough, this time around, Trump has, in a good way, upended relations with European allies by snubbing their involvement in peace talks with Russia. The rupture in the transatlantic alliance has cast a huge shadow of doubt that the NATO bloc can hold together after 76 years of existence.
At the very least, Trump has created a space for dialogue and potential peace. However, it remains to be seen if his administration delivers on resolving the systematic causes of conflict.
It could turn out that Washington is merely moving to save face for the United States from an embarrassing defeat in Ukraine, aiming to dump the costs on its European lackeys, rather than forging a genuine security treaty as demanded by Moscow.
Washington’s belated dropping of the narrative about “Russian aggression” proves that the narrative was baseless. The Western-backed war in Ukraine with hundreds of billions of dollars and euros has been fueled on lies and deception. That is monstrously criminal.
Russia launched its special military operation to protect the ethnic Russian population that had come under relentless, murderous attacks by the NATO-backed Kiev regime that the CIA had installed in the 2014 coup.
Russia has regained historic territories through referenda in Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions. Other historic territories are also up for reclaiming, including Kharkiv and Odessa, the port city founded by Russian empress Catherine the Great in the 18th century.
Russia will continue its military campaign to eradicate the Neo-Nazi regime in Kiev.
And Russia will ensure that the NATO bloc (if it continues to exist, which is doubtful at this time) never acquires a foothold in the rump Ukrainian territory. That includes rejecting any spurious notion by Britain and France of deploying “peacekeeping troops”.
The debacle among the U.S. and its European allies is proof of Russia’s vindication and why it was wholly justified in taking military action against NATO in Ukraine.
The enemies of Russia are in no position to trade. They have nothing to trade.
Russia’s vindication means there can be no shoddy deal – or compromises as Trump fancifully reckons. Russia is right to insist on all its demands for security and respect.

I lost interest when I came across this nonsense: “NeoNazi regime”.
Can someone kindly tell me what is a NeoNazi regime?
Fact1: the term ‘nazi’ was dreamed up by a New York jew ( surprise, surprise ) to name-call the National Socialist movement in Germany in the 1930’s.
Fact 2: The National Socialists NEVER referred to themselves as ‘nazis’.
Fact 3: Only jews or uninformed/misinformed goyim use the term ‘nazi’.
LOL…
Yes the fake war has been a resounding success for Vlad and his gangsters…apparently?…The remaininggenerals and Donbass patriots the Gremilin didn’t assassinate or disappear are all banged up…
Yankee Corporate clown vultures are about to sweep in and gobble up the resources, nearly a million dead white Slavs that will be replaced by millions of swarthes and mongols…
Two thirds of Ukraine will be policed by OTAN…the Chinese are greedily and slantily eyeing both reconstruction in the Ukraine and areas that at the mo’ belong to the Russkie paper tiger..
Kicked out of Syria and lost all their Mediterranean ports after having helped the Assads loot their country..
At least 300 billion gone walkies from their ‘Trusted Western Partners’.. who they want to now invite in to re-develop their very own bio-security state..
…but don’t worry because Lavyrov and all the the other ‘jewe’ henchmen will get their luxury yachts and Knightsbridge apartments back…and Chabad’s as happy as Larry and mo..
fuck the dead…forget ’em..the Russkies have..
Sounds like a line from a song by the Who: “meet the new boss (Russia), same as the old boss (US).”
Multi-polar world, eh? Nope…it’s just a “both sides of the same coin” scenario….one world order, just a bit different this time (with Talmudic Jewry/Syangogue of Satan still in charge over the Noahidic gentiles as their puppets).
One thing Trump and Vance have done is shown other western leaders who think they stand above him that he will dress them down publicly if they get too far up themselves. Though I’m still wary of Trump because it’s so early into his second and (so far) final term, but I was impressed he didn’t let his anger carry him away too much and was still diplomatic in putting the upstart Zee in his place. Vance too.
It was the 21st Amendment to the Constitution in 1951 which limits a President to two terms. It came about after President Franklin D Roosevelt was elected four times and died in his fourth term. It was no doubt a Republican response to the Democrat FDR wining more than two terms. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson stood down after two terms after declaring it unhealthy for politics for one leader stay too long, and so set an unwritten two-term limit until the 1951 21st Amendment made it binding. But as a much later Amendment, and only the first ten Amendments make up the Bill of Rights, all it would take is for someone to repeal it. Not an easy task but it’s not impossible either.
Correction, it was the 1951 22nd Amendment. The 21st Amendment ended Prohibition in 1933, repealing the 18th Amendment of 1919 (the Volstead Act) which outlawed alcohol. Andrew Volstead was pandering to the Temperance Movement who were mostly women fed up with husbands who drank, and women had just been granted the vote (19th Amendment, 1919) and as a Republican in the House of Representatives Volstead went after the women’s vote thinking millions of women would carry him into the White House.
more commie bs. that nico x guy was right all along. brics is jew governed, just like nato. the russia-ukraine war was a setup to exterminate whites. only idiots are unable to recognize this