HenryMakow.com – Feb 26, 2024
The reality is darker, bleaker, and unequivocally hopeless.
Organized Jewry (WEF) succeeds in exterminating over a million goyim.
“The few men who remain are terrified
of leaving their homes for fear of being
kidnapped into conscription. Some have resorted
to begging friends to break their legs to avoid service.”
“There is no ambiguity in these people. The war was for nothing – a travesty.
The outcome always was, and is, clear. The people are hopeless, utterly destroyed, and living in an unending nightmare.”
by Maria Mateiciuc – (henrymakow.com)
I just got back from Ukraine, where I was visiting some friends.
Everything we have heard about what’s happening in Ukraine is a lie.
The reality is darker, bleaker, and unequivocally hopeless. There is no such thing as Ukraine “winning” this war.
– By their estimates, they have lost over one million of their sons, fathers and husbands; an entire generation is gone.
– Even in the Southwest, where the anti-Russian sentiment is long-standing, citizens are reluctant or straight-up scared to publicly criticize Zelensky; they will go to jail.
– In every village and town, the streets, shops, and restaurants are mostly absent of men.
– The few men who remain are terrified of leaving their homes for fear of being kidnapped into conscription. Some have resorted to begging friends to break their legs to avoid service.
– Army search parties take place early in the morning, when men leave their homes to go to work. They ambush and kidnap them off the streets and within 3-4 hours they get listed in the army and taken away straight to the front lines with minimal or no training at all; it is “a death sentence.”
– It’s getting worse every day. Where I was staying, a dentist had just been taken by security forces on his way to work, leaving behind two small children. Every day, 3-5 dead bodies keep arriving from the front lines.
– Mothers and wives fight tooth and nail with the armed forces, beg and plead not to have their men taken away. They try bribing, which sometimes works, but most of the time they are met with physical violence and death threats.
– The territory celebrated as having been “won back” from Russia has been reduced to rubble and is uninhabitable. Regardless, there is no one left to live there and displaced families will likely never return.
– They see the way the war has been reported, at home and abroad. It’s a “joke” and “propaganda.” They say: “Look around: is this winning?”.
– Worse, some have been hoaxed into believing that once Ukrainians forces are exhausted, American soldiers will come in to replace them and “win the war”.
Well, I read what can be seen on here.
What else would you expect, this is a Nazi state supported by the NWO NATO Satanic Nazi West, and Israel is an unsigned NATO member.
At the end it appears to imply Amerikans Nazis will come to the fight.
Slovak leader Robert Fico, says he’s seen Nazis meetings notes about sending NATO troops into UKraine, but not Amerikan, it’s election year.
The Daily Fail also reports that Macron says he hasn’t ruled out sending French troops to UKraine, this makes me laugh.
The truth, there are 10s of thousands of NATO forces in UKraine. Some are in UKrainian Nazi uniforms, but some are wearing identifiers from their homelands.
So the NWO Nazis are already in, super deep. Maybe the bodies don’t come home. Maybe they’ll come home one day as grain crops?
Robert Fico, was aloud to see those notes, because they knew he’d gob, and Macron timed it. Can’t break your rams as home, then send them to die in UKraine.
Of course, there’s no serious intent to win, even if they send in all these sheeple, because they need kit. Tanks, rocket launchers, air defense systems that work, and an airforce (lol).
Yes, I digress. The real reason for the note leak, and Macron, is that this is a sheeple feeler, just like conscription feeler in the UK.
One thing seems certain, this war ain’t over yet. As for the state of UKraine, this is what they asked for. A highly hateful nationalist Bandara supporting flock who hates Russians, and probably hates all none whites. Live by hate, get killed by Russians.
ZIONISTS AGAIN ATTACK CHARLOTTE CHURCH
An independent accountant in the year 2000 allerted Charlote Church’s family to the fact their musical agent was robbing them
So they Sacked Jonathan Shalit after he attempted to claim 20% of the 14-year-old’s earnings until the year 2002…
The legal battle involving CHARLOTTE CHURCH and her former manager JONATHAN SHALIT got underway at the High Court in LONDON
Shalit also wanted a cut of royalties on recordings made before then, in compensation for loss of earnings.
He claims that her mother, Maria, was a “pushy woman”. Mrs Church alleges that Shalit’s behaviour was inappropriate, claiming he made a lewd comment about her daughter’s chest, which he always longingly stared at and swore at her during a row over a plane ticket.
Shalit got Rupert Murdoch who tapped their phones to print salacious stories in his news papers defaming Charlotte and threatening her mother
But Charlotte Church denies being anti-jewish after singing a pro-Palestinian song
The Welsh singer Charlotte Church has denied being antisemitic after taking part in a concert that featured the song From the River to the Sea.
Church was singing at the concert, which took place at the Bedwas Workmen’s Hall near Caerphilly, to raise money for the Middle East Children’s Alliance, an aid organisation that supports food for and medicines in Gaza, baned by the IDF The singer led a choir of around 100 people in a rendition of From the River to the Sea, a song that references the land between the Jordan River, which borders eastern palestine and the Mediterranean Sea to the west. Critics. Jonathan Shalit a homosexual jew is chairman of the InterTalent Rights Group, formerly ROAR Global and Cole Kitche He said Show busoiness is run by us, you pay me to manage or you just dont perfom
During an Instagram Live video on Monday, Church said: “Just to clarify my intentions there, I am in no way anti-jewish. I am fighting for the liberation of all people. I have a deep heart for all religions and all difference, especially all children”
“It was a beautiful, beautiful event. But unfortunately, the powers that be can’t have that. [They] can’t have such a powerful symbol of peace as what we worked towards on Saturday.”
Jewish agents robbing goy performers is commonplace, the beatles only got a small percentage of their earnings
John lennon spoke of this often
John once sang after a drunken party in Hamburg where the manger refused to pay them, the British soldiers wartime song
” beware beware the dirty jew ”
Pete Best was blamed and sacked
And still, despite these claims,
The Elusive ‘Jackal’ sniper is just a fictitious dream.
The traitors are tagged as nationalists, rabid bullies, forcing the populous against their wishes.
They are in fact penny chew controlled communist scum.
The NSDAP never operated this way against their own nationals.
It’s clear, the MO is to reduce the Caucasian numbers of the remaining white Christian population.
The opposing ‘Federation’ say things people like to hear, but they too are upholding their end of the bargain too. stringing the whole farce as long as possible.
This doesn’t end well at all.
American soldiers will come in to replace them and “win the war”. LOL.
Yeah, them & the conglomerate duped to join them, Haven’t we been here before..!
TWICE.
There are plenty of Ukes here in Ireland on free everything and very happy about “the war”. It’s interesting how ugly these people actually are.
ANOTHER STABBING AT A LONDON RAIL STATION
Murder probe launched after ‘despicable’ attack at rail station
London has become known world wide as the worlds stabbing capital
While politicians closed 600 police stations sacked hundreds of officers, yet politicians demanded protection against migrant gangs for themselves
Thes racist stabbings and muggings have cost the capital millions in lost tourism.
Officers were called to Harold Wood station shortly after 4.30am after a member of station staff reported that an individual was badly hurt and lying on the floor of the station, emergency services including the British Transport Police, Metropolitan Police and the London Ambulance Service attended the scene and found a person with extensive injuries.
Despite their best efforts, the person was pronounced dead at the scene while a man has been arrested in connection with the incident.
Detective Chief Inspector Sam Blackburn said: “This act of unprovoked violence was despicable. The investigation remains in the early stages, and although though we are satisfied that this was an isolated incident the station will remain closed while we continue our enquiries.
“…straight-up scared…” Well, die, then–fear is the number one sin, completely unthinkable, a blasphemy and worse
I suspect the main plan for Ukraine considering big capital bought into it, and considering war devastation would leave the place unsuitable for a new Israel, was to create a massive plantation like the slave fields of previous centuries. While it’s unlikely they’d get away with a workforce of slaves, it is possible the place would be just one step above slavery, with work conditions similar to that of Asians working in the Arab kingdoms. Vast swathes of crops sown and harvested by poorly-paid people, only fed and clothed well enough to do the work, living in camps and billets across the country. It could also become a place of slum factories to take business from China.
One big appeal to attract workers is they would be able to send a few dollars home to family every week, and where they’ll be drawn from that’s enough for their family to survive on. Thank goodness for all of us somewhere like that will not be permitted under Russian control, because that would be the new labour model everybody elsewhere would all be in competition with.
Yes that’s right…
Another genocide is unfurling..another Holodomor in the very same place..staged and managed by the very same creatures..of course the contemporary imbecile rushes into a mind space cunningly pre-formed for his under developed fatty hemispheres..and takes his ‘side’…
as credulous as ever..
..believing comforting fairy tales of Russian (or if you like and ‘support’ the other ‘team’, Ukrainian) gangsters.. even though they are quite obviously neither Russians or Ukrainians…and who apparently are here to save them.. or something or other..
From the ‘nazi’s’ or not so New World Order ‘Satanists’ and it’s reprobates..
… to slot them all into a utopian bio-security multipolar paradise that happens to be run by the same people staging the slaughter…and who also want YOU dead..and as soon as is possible..
but perhaps they haven’t actually noticed because they were having a little nap for the last 30 years..or too busy talking shit… to notice..
.Indeed… all of this…
when in fact it’s just a clearing operation.. a wreath for the nation state…and it’s young men..
a predictable slaughter like so many before..
I built a cabin in the back woods, and soon a beautiful new woman moved in. She transformed the place inside and out into a beautiful representation of her heart.
Likewise the utter depravity of the Jew and his black heart turns Ukraine, Gaza, Syria, Iraq into an ugly manifestation of the inner Jew feelings and mind.
What you are witnessing is the physical expression of the Jew mind and heart – blackness and depravity – be aware of that.
Yep, looks like Nico X is right. Both ‘sides’ (NATOUkraine/Russia) governed by the same Yid gang. Welcome to Whiteocide.
As a confirmed cynic and a sarcastic s.o.b., the whole Ukraine thing is horrifying in that one’s entire situation may rely entirely upon luck, as that luck is intersected by “RULE BY JEWS.”
Consider that the entire definition of Marxist, bolshevik communism — including all of its historic results– is best defined with the same three words: “rule by Jews.
What is it going to take to rid our world of these noxious, orc-like vermin?
AOC already said, “10 million American boys into the trenches and 10 million migrants can replace them”.
ghost
Nico X has already provided the answer:
‘The Book of the Law’
A.A.
Is it true? Was Stalin a Khazar? Is Zelinsky a Khazar? Is Nuland a Khazar. Did each of them depopulate Christians from their respective countries? Was this the same pattern followed by the “Young Turks” (Khazars) when they depopulated the Armenian Christians?
smokey
They’re not ‘Khazars’ but Jews. Any mongrel can convert to Judaism & become a Jew. Jew is just another word for ‘mongrel’. For thousands of years anti-white mongrel Jew Talmudic nutjobs existed (Ashkenazi, Sephardim, Mizrahim), long before any ‘Khazar’ converted to Judaism.
Lewis Jones , lets see how brave you are on the front lines- let us know when you are going and how brave you feel
“By the time Martin Buber wrote “I and Thou” in the early 1920s, many had already observed that the impersonality of modern society and culture seemed somehow related to the growth of “objectivity” in modern science and technology, in political affairs, and in modern economic life. Buber’s concern in “I and Thou”, then, was to explain this development at the deepest level. He began by observing that the human attitude toward the world is basically two-sided. The world may be viewed as an “object,” in effect, ontologically inferior to the knowing subject, in which case it will be experienced in terms of the juxtaposition of “I” and “it”. Or the world may be beheld as a genuine “other,” that is, on an ontological par with us as we behold it. In this latter case, the world will be experienced personally as in the relation between an “I” and a “Thou.” To the extent that we desire to achieve control over the world, Buber continued, we will be attracted by the utility of rendering it “objectively,” for rendering the world in terms of potentially manipulable objects is far easier and much more conducive to effective management than contemplating the world, admiring it, entering into genuine dialogue wit it, and caring for it. Along this line, Buber observed that the “objectification” of the world has become, just as we have seen, a hallmark of modern civilization.
Buber then went on to observe that the self-understanding emerging out of the “I-It” conjunction is fundamentally different from that which is made possible in the “I-Thou” relation, and this is the heart of his argument. The act of objectification, Buber observed, does not really require one’s whole self but rather discloses a kind of one-sided relation in which there is really only one active voice. The “I-It” conjunction does not really expose the self, therefore, to the possibility of relational mutuality. It does not require or foster self-transcendence. As Alister McFadyen noted more recently in a study entitled “The Call to Personhood” (1990):”
“Intending someone or something as an object is to intend the relation as a monologue. For an object is intended and perceived as having no independent meaning or existence apart from this relation. It cannot offer a point of moral resistance because it is not perceived as ethically transcendent. The relation can only be exploitative and manipulative. . . .The I of an I-It relation has an unbounded sense of its proper claims, seeking from the other only that which is a confirmatory repetition of itself. In seeking oneself from the other, one is engaged in a one-way communication open only to oneself.” . . .
Of course, while this “one-way communication open only to oneself” may enhance our ability to control the world in certain respects, it also inhibits our ability to enter into an “I-Thou” relation with the world, with other people, and ultimately with God, and so is extremely costly in personal terms. In the first instance, the objective attitude essentially prevents us from apprehending such things as beauty, for anything that is appreciated only as a “resource” — that is, as something to be utilized — cannot really be apprehended as beautiful. The objective spirit is also quite obviously destructive of any number of relationships that it is possible to have with other persons. While the objective utilization of others may be of some benefit to instrumental relationality and may improve our ability to “get things done” in the world, it is not at all conducive to such things as family, friendship, camaraderie, and fellowship. It is obviously not conducive to worship either. Indeed, the objective attitude is largely atheistic, even if only tacitly and practically so, for the possibility of truly spiritual relationality simply does not survive the process of objectification. While the various idols do not seem to mind being treated as objects, in other words, the living God does not allow himself to be known “objectively,” that is, as an object of human manipulation. If we seek to know Him in this fashion, he quite quickly retreats from our view”. . . .
“The difficult problem we face today, as we have seen, is that the manipulative “objectivity” required within modernity’s central institutions encourages us to adopt a manipulative attitude toward the rest of our lives. After all, “I-It” relationality promises faster results with less effort. Objectification and not contemplation, we are told in effect, is the surest route to mastery and so to the alleviation of our anxieties. To the extend that we believe this typically modern lie, however, we are drawn into a kind of endless regress, for objectification actually only has the effect of intensifying our anxiety because it further erodes the possibility of genuinely personal existence. Under modern conditions, the erosion only makes objectification seem all the more necessary and so forth. Indeed, we are told that we really have no other choice today but to pursue control over the world by means of an “I-It” relationality. Buber concludes:
“In sick ages, it happens that the It-world, no longer irrigated and fertilized by the living currents of the You (Thou)-World, severed and stagnant, becomes a gigantic swamp phantom and overpowers man. As he accommodates himself to a world of objects that no longer achieve any presence for him, he succumbs to it. Then common causality grows into an oppressive and crushing doom.”
“Healing the sickness of our age will thus require us, at the very least, to swim against the modern current of objectification for the sake of control.”
“By the time Martin Buber wrote “I and Thou” in the early 1920s, many had already observed that the impersonality of modern society and culture seemed somehow related to the growth of “objectivity” in modern science and technology, in political affairs, and in modern economic life. Buber’s concern in “I and Thou”, then, was to explain this development at the deepest level. He began by observing that the human attitude toward the world is basically two-sided. The world may be viewed as an “object,” in effect, ontologically inferior to the knowing subject, in which case it will be experienced in terms of the juxtaposition of “I” and “it”. Or the world may be beheld as a genuine “other,” that is, on an ontological par with us as we behold it. In this latter case, the world will be experienced personally as in the relation between an “I” and a “Thou.” To the extent that we desire to achieve control over the world, Buber continued, we will be attracted by the utility of rendering it “objectively,” for rendering the world in terms of potentially manipulable objects is far easier and much more conducive to effective management than contemplating the world, admiring it, entering into genuine dialogue wit it, and caring for it. Along this line, Buber observed that the “objectification” of the world has become, just as we have seen, a hallmark of modern civilization.
Buber then went on to observe that the self-understanding emerging out of the “I-It” conjunction is fundamentally different from that which is made possible in the “I-Thou” relation, and this is the heart of his argument. The act of objectification, Buber observed, does not really require one’s whole self but rather discloses a kind of one-sided relation in which there is really only one active voice. The “I-It” conjunction does not really expose the self, therefore, to the possibility of relational mutuality. It does not require or foster self-transcendence. As Alister McFadyen noted more recently in a study entitled “The Call to Personhood” (1990):”
“Intending someone or something as an object is to intend the relation as a monologue. For an object is intended and perceived as having no independent meaning or existence apart from this relation. It cannot offer a point of moral resistance because it is not perceived as ethically transcendent. The relation can only be exploitative and manipulative. . . .The I of an I-It relation has an unbounded sense of its proper claims, seeking from the other only that which is a confirmatory repetition of itself. In seeking oneself from the other, one is engaged in a one-way communication open only to oneself.” . . .
Of course, while this “one-way communication open only to oneself” may enhance our ability to control the world in certain respects, it also inhibits our ability to enter into an “I-Thou” relation with the world, with other people, and ultimately with God, and so is extremely costly in personal terms. In the first instance, the objective attitude essentially prevents us from apprehending such things as beauty, for anything that is appreciated only as a “resource” — that is, as something to be utilized — cannot really be apprehended as beautiful. The objective spirit is also quite obviously destructive of any number of relationships that it is possible to have with other persons. While the objective utilization of others may be of some benefit to instrumental relationality and may improve our ability to “get things done” in the world, it is not at all conducive to such things as family, friendship, camaraderie, and fellowship. It is obviously not conducive to worship either. Indeed, the objective attitude is largely atheistic, even if only tacitly and practically so, for the possibility of truly spiritual relationality simply does not survive the process of objectification. While the various idols do not seem to mind being treated as objects, in other words, the living God does not allow himself to be known “objectively,” that is, as an object of human manipulation. If we seek to know Him in this fashion, he quite quickly retreats from our view”. . . .
“The difficult problem we face today, as we have seen, is that the manipulative “objectivity” required within modernity’s central institutions encourages us to adopt a manipulative attitude toward the rest of our lives. After all, “I-It” relationality promises faster results with less effort. Objectification and not contemplation, we are told in effect, is the surest route to mastery and so to the alleviation of our anxieties. To the extend that we believe this typically modern lie, however, we are drawn into a kind of endless regress, for objectification actually only has the effect of intensifying our anxiety because it further erodes the possibility of genuinely personal existence. Under modern conditions, the erosion only makes objectification seem all the more necessary and so forth. Indeed, we are told that we really have no other choice today but to pursue control over the world by means of an “I-It” relationality. Buber concludes:
“In sick ages, it happens that the It-world, no longer irrigated and fertilized by the living currents of the You (Thou)-World, severed and stagnant, becomes a gigantic swamp phantom and overpowers man. As he accommodates himself to a world of objects that no longer achieve any presence for him, he succumbs to it. Then common causality grows into an oppressive and crushing doom.”
“Healing the sickness of our age will thus require us, at the very least, to swim against the modern current of objectification for the sake of control.”
PS: I may have submitted this twice in which case, I do apologize.
Ukrainians get a gun + shoot the drafters following
them to other places where you dont live . avoid
witnesses ! take all copies of their drafts + burn it !
i m sick of seeing this idea on here that at the wars end Hitler survived
and the third reich took over the UK
this is bollox
i always thought carl jones was joking
but nonsense should not be on here
if Rixon was still alive he would not have allowed this twat to put shit up in the comments
“Animated Dust” was it worth your valuable time to write this stuff…..probably not.
Stephen John Jones
So is some Commie running this site now instead of Rixon???
Hey, Carl Jones,
How are the Nazis going in Tel Aviv?
Tricky Nixon should be given credit for upholding free speech.
He has allowed some real guff in the comments ( Jonesy take note ).
It shows up the ‘Controllers’ of the mainstream as haters of freedom.
Well done Tricky. Keep it up.
steve–only a coward would agree to go and kill people just like himself