Police and armed officers at the Manchester Arena after the blast in May 2017
N.K. — Terror on the Tube Feb 9, 2024
On January 29th, the ‘paranormal investigator’ Richard D Hall was taken to court by Martin Hibbert at the High Court of Justice. I was one of the fortunate few to be allowed in, with most of the three dozen or so of the public being shooed out of the court on the grounds that they could not get any chairs and standing wasn’t allowed. People objected on the sound basis that they were there to witness whatever justice was to be administered.
As it transpired the arguments were rather oblique and the purpose of the court hearing was most unclear. In a nutshell, one could say that Hibbert claims to have been right next to ‘the terrorist’ when his bomb went off on 22.5.17 at 10.30 pm at the Manchester Arena and he was penetrated by 22 pieces of shrapnel; whereas RDH does not accept that Mr Hibbert was even at the concert. There is a big difference of opinion here BUT that was not, ostensibly what this court hearing was about.
The case is supposedly being brought by Martin Hibbert and his daughter Eve: the latter has not been seen by anyone – reportedly – since ‘the night of the bomb’ ie no-one seems to have a picture of her or will say they have seen her. The poor child had a piece of ‘shrapnel’ go right through her head, in one aside and out the other, but don’t worry she’s back at school now reading and writing, or so the Court heard. Is Britain’s High court of Justice allowed to hear a case brought by someone who is appearing as somewhat non-existent?
“The claimants commenced proceedings against the defendant for harassment, misuse of private information and data protection breaches.” The harassment charge is quite clear, that five years ago in 2019 Richard D. Hall did indeed go up to the home where Eve was living with her mother, and ring the doorbell. Oh no, he rang the doorbell! Well there was no answer so he went away. BUT he also left a film running in his car parked opposite for a couple of hours. Was that a data-protection breach? I don’t think so.
Ordinary folk are enraged (I find) when told about these charges: we all know what harassment means and this isn’t it. As a professional journalist RDH has only used open-source publicly-available data. He has not violated anyone’s privacy. He merely disagrees about what happened at a public event, which is no crime.
At the hearing last week, I heard no word about alleged harassment or private-information misuse. I’m not at all clear that there is any private information here involved – Mr Hibbert is a very public person, a bit of a media star in fact. Obviously harassment has taken place in this case but it was by the BBC, who sent a team to RDH’s stall in Merthyr Tidvel in South Wales unannounced, interfering with his sales, filming him, then soon after getting the local council to close down his market-stall, then getting his Youtube channel closed down and sponsoring various media hit-pieces. Yes that is harassment.
The judgement found against him, was that “” I find that the defendant has not discharged the evidential burden which rests on him. He has no real prospect, indeed no prospect at all, of success on the Issues and I will resolve them in the claimants’ favour.” What was the ‘evidential burden’ which rested upon him? The case was NOT ABOUT what happened on the ‘Night of the Bang’ – or should not have been. This is where the duplicity of this court hearing becomes evident: had the charge been libel or defamation, then everything in the court hearing would have made sense. The whole hearing was in fact about whether DRH’s ‘alternate version’ of events that night was credible or not. Surely, RDH has defamed people, by saying they were mere crisis actors enacting a fictional drama. So why don’t they sue him for that? They don’t BECAUSE such a hearing – which could easily last a week – would allow RDH to present all his version of events to a jury . and where might that lead?
RDH has produced a four-hundred page book which got about fifty five-star reviews before being banned by Amazon, plus quite a few highly-informative videos, plus an in-depth analysis of ALL of the CCTV released, so how has he not ‘discharged’ the ‘evidential burden’? He has analysed the event more thoroughly than anyone else in the world. What is the ‘success’ of which RDH has in the judge’s view ‘no prospect’? For their evidence showing that Hibbert was present at the concert, the Judges report alleged that some fellow had viewed secret, un-released CCTV – too graphic for us, the public to see – which showed that Hibbert was present. Most people get quite angry when told that such a story is ‘evidence.’ At the court hearing, RDH called for ALL CCTV up to the moment of the bang, to be released.
As regards the alleged suicide ‘terrorist’ Salman Abedi, the judge found “It is fanciful to propose that Salman Abedi did not die.” Fanciful? THERE IS NO BODY – Manchester police cannot produce a corpse of the alleged suicide bomber. No inquest, no death certificate: nor for that matter can they produce bodies for any of the 22 allegedly dead victims. ‘Habeus corpus’ is a basic principle of British justice and can be loosely translated as, have you got the body? In the absence of a body, the burden of proof does not rest upon RDH to show that an alleged ‘suicide bomber’ did really commit suicide (for no known reason). We should be grateful for RDH’s careful and excellent analysis of all the CCTV – months of work – indicating how Albedi arrived, parked his car, then escaped later in the same car, after seemingly placing his bag in the Atrium where it later went bang.
So we finally come to the point of the convoluted logic of this court hearing – as to why there would be no point in allowing the Defendant (RDH) to present evidence as to what happened in the forthcoming court-hearing: “… whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that further evidence or investigation would affect the outcome of the case (or, in this case, the Issues). There are no such reasonable grounds.” His case is soooo unreasonable that there would be no point in allowing him to present it! Note that this final judgement has no connection whatsoever with what the case was supposedly about ,viz. harassment and misuse of private data.
RDH represented himself in court and gave an excellent account of his case over fifty minutes. I personally would have advised him not to do that, which was in a way too much information, and to make ONLY one point about what happened on that night: that the Atrium by the main concert-arena has a glass roof, huge glass windows and doors, and NO they were not cracked by any blast that night. Nor were there any pock-marks in the walls from shrapnel. therefore THERE WAS NO SHRAPNEL. End of story. It’s very simple.
Journalists need to grill Mr Hibbert about the number 22. On the 22nd at 22 hours after 22 songs had been sung a 22 year old terrorist killed 22 people and Hibbert received 22 shrapnel wounds. Then Manchester police arrested 22 suspects .. and so it goes on. No wonder Hibbert has got the number 22 tattooed on his back. He didn’t say a word at the trial, he didn’t have to.
Also see:
i have a friend pete who is a crisis actor he has been in several films of supposed bombings
but its really his friend who lost a leg in iraq while planting bombs
that has all the info he says hes been in 5 films of fake bombings
The “New Normal” where down is up, black is white and actual evidence and truth don’t matter. So much for “justice” in the jew world order.
Richard T. Hall is one of the most thorough, if not the most, thorough investigative journalists in the world. He has an impressive record of looking deeply into numerous murky affairs over the last decade or so and uncovering some ugly truths.
In sharp contrast, the coverage of his so-called trial by a certain well-known “news” paper website has been nothing less than shameful.
Ironically, the same organ has run a story this week about the conviction and hanging of two men for a sexual offence in 1835. The account of the justice handed down then demonstrates that little has changed within the British judicial system since then.
Equally, look at the frankly hysterical reaction to the Putin interview on the same website.
Investigative journalists are a severely endangered species in c21. Note the fate of Julian Assange and Gonzalo Lira.
Please support Richard in any way you can.
Ultimately, truth will out.
The Abedi family were I5I5 members. ISIS members living in the UK. They were allowed to come and go from Lybia.The Cameron government backed ISIS and destroyed Lybia.
in the episode of coronation street broadcast on the Monday after the bang,
at one point a slow camera shot pans across the back wall of the café
” Roy’s Rolls”,
upon which the character playing the owner
displays his collection of railway memorabilia.
in the middle of the wall is a sign upon which the camera seems to linger,
almost stopping…
before resuming its slow panning pace and finishing the shot.
the sign indicates a number,
the number “22”.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/a6LkvZVWy0zY/
Gemma O’Doherty and I Sarah Plumley analyse the Richard D. Hall Summary Judgement.
Whilst the #FakeNewsMedia are calling Richard, (England’s best investigative journalist), “Britain’s Sickest Man”, the self-proclaimed “alt” media show up a day late and a dollar short. Why is it that most ‘alt’ media outlets NEVER investigate #FalseFlagTerrorism? Why do they not share the work of Richard D. Hall?
Good stuff RDH certainly has made his case and should not be dismissed.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VdqIpQe7pOxt/
The persecution of journalist Richard D Hall who is being sued for exposing the Manchester Loud Bang in 2017 and how he has been abandoned by the fake alternative media. Joined by Sarah Plumley
This is the one I watched yesterday.
Good honest discussion
“Obviously harassment has taken place in this case but it was by the BBC, who sent a team to RDH’s stall in Merthyr Tydvel in South Wales unannounced, interfering with his sales, filming him etc etc”
Ahhh… it wouldnt be a “Show Trial” without ZOGUK’s Bolshevik Brainwasing Corp turning up beforehand to muddy the waters… WOULD IT?😂
from the superb david irving website
clement freud and missing kids
https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/sir-clement-freud-and-the-disappearance
This is not a surprise.
Did we really need another example of our corrupt legal system to realise that legal donations to truth warriors are just a tax on honesty?
The legalese in which these judgements are written is designed to throw off those seeking the thread of logic. They are created with exquisite BS. The judgement will prove the “evidence” for the BBC etc. that Richard Hall is a troll. I’m reminded of the various judgements against David Irving.
What percentage of people have heard of Hall and his work? Certainly among us, he has currency. Unfortunately, for what we might call the “truth movement”, the public are George Orwell’s proles. The medium is the message. What most people will know of Hall is from the BBC and the gutter press.
Totalitarianism in the modern world is more absolute than in previous ages. Crimes against the state, which Richard Hall’s sleuthing amount to, would have at one time been met by capital punishment as a warning to others. The system, however, has long refined its methods by instead of hanging, drawing, and quartering, but by anticipating and informing the mindspace of the greater court of public opinion. The judgement against Hall is a judgement against the ignorance of British people who don’t give a damn until problems occur on their own doorstep. Entertainment is more important to them than truth.
What might we say of the judge, Hibbert, and the whole political structure that “needed” the Manchester event for foreign policy justification?
Richard Hall should be proud of his work. He is the noblest of men. For the others, when/if society recovers its sanity their name will be mud until the end of time.
Pain is temporary, pride is forever.
It doesn’t mean anything. Since power supersedes truth & justice. As long as your cult controls the State-Media complex then you can stage & get away with anything, no matter how absurd the ‘evidence’ is. Thus the only way to end these various psyop hoax shootings/’terrorist attacks’ is not to expose them, but to liquidate the Overlords.
>>> Investigative journalists are a severely endangered species in c21. Note the fate of Julian Assange and Gonzalo Lira. <<<
Assange is a made up karakter. Please dig into 2 his rather dubious background.
He has NOTHING 2 do fi with Wiki-leaks which is creation by MOSSAD!
Personally, I don't give a rat's ass what happens 2 mr. assange.
I always liked Richard D. Hall – especially his coverage of the fake moon landing.
Still no mention of the death of internet writer John Kaminski on this site, his essays were featured here.
I think Rixon should put up an article so we can comment about this courageous man – the first journalist on the planet to out the real perps of 911.
@ jay..
Well if that is true it would be safe to say that he was an asset in spook parlance..it would also be safe to say that these so called ahem..’terrorists’ are usually and quite suspiciously always ‘known’ to the SS… before they spontaneously combust or not.. as the case may be..
Most of them are sleepers and patsies groomed and funded by intel.. plucked from spooky rat runs in the diddle East and Africa and wherever the fuck else..and given a house down your street near the Mosque..because of course that’s their ‘job’..and why it’s best not to believe a word of it…
.. spies lie..it’s what they do…
Apparently he was warned 12 months ago to get his assets out of the country, to protect his website and his films. They never listen
Do They.
Crowley (aka Nico, obviously) has it right in his comment above.
If the criminal degenerate “judge” was named in the piece, I missed it. But whoever the robed lying scumbag is, they deserve to be dragged out of that den of corruption courtroom and into the street by their ankles, stripped naked, have their teeth bashed out, their tongue ripped out and nailed to the courthouse door, receive a vigorous horse-whipping until they piss all over themself, get rolled in pig shit and salt, then hanged from the closest streetlight post with a sign stapled to their chest that says, “No more tolerance for Treachery and Treason”…and brand their ass with “22”.
the number 22 s a sacred number to the jews and the number o picture cards in the tarot pack
names like david and sarah are chiosen as they in numerology add to 22
this numerology is a branch of astrology which churchills team fought the w w 2 on even the date of D Day was chosen by them
whisteleblowers must expect at some point to be attacked by the communist state
look at nick kolleratrom maud did chris cooper etc
they all got shot thrown at then
Watch the video
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=283&part=1&gen=99
This is one of the mysteries: do the Scum want us to love the Moslems or to hate them? Macron says France is a Moslem country while the Deep State organises sadistic “Moslem” attacks on the French, and a similar story in the other White countries. A possible answer is that the attacks are meant to make Whites respect the hardiness of Moslems, something to not mess with
would this not be resolved if a freedom of information request was made on the Hospitals local to the arena , and request injuries and amount of people admitted that evening , also surely to speak to the undertakers who did the funerals , they must have seen bodies ?
@ Lewis
It’s operation chaos Lewis…the common imbecile hasn’t yet worked out he is an enemy combatant..at war with his own govern-ment and the xenocrat state..
his living room the battlefield… the war on terror playing out in the cavity between his ears… his new neighbours islamic jihadists on welfare…
Working for Mi6..
@Lewis Jones…
in the 60’s all over the UK,
white working class communities were physically broken up.
and the people that made up those “tight knit” communities were shipped out to new estates on the outskirts of most major Cities.
built on what were green fields, it was preparation for the importing and accommodating of whole clans/families,
of people from every corrupt shithole on the planet,
people that came as oven ready” tight knit” communities
the inner cities emptied of whites by a simple ruse involving years of neglect of council housing stock
and when the time was right…
“we cant have people living in slums”
so off they went..
its not that they are “hard “per se Lewis, its that they operate best in gangs because they cant really fight! but there are always lots of them in any place they have taken over,
and they can call up reinforcements in minutes.
I have seen it in action, had friends that fell foul of it.
@Lewis Jones…
in the 60’s all over the UK,
white working class communities were physically broken up.
and the people that made up those “tight knit” communities were shipped out to new estates on the outskirts of most major Cities.
built on what were green fields, it was preparation for the importing and accommodating of whole clans/families,
of people from every corrupt shithole on the planet,
people that came as oven ready” tight knit” communities
the inner cities emptied of whites by a simple ruse involving years of neglect of council housing stock
and when the time was right…
“we cant have people living in slums”
so off they went..
its not that they are “hard “per se Lewis, its that they operate best in gangs because they cant really fight! but there are always lots of them in any place they have taken over,
and they can call up reinforcements in minutes.
I have seen it in action, had friends that fell foul of it.
the natives were very carefully scattered,
what tookyears to knit was unravelled in no time,