Mike Whitney – The Unz Review Dec 11, 2022
Last week’s drone attacks on Russian military bases represent a serious escalation in Washington’s proxy war on Russia. One of the attacks involved an airfield that is located less than 200 miles from Moscow. Naturally, the incident rankled Russian President Vladimir Putin who convened an emergency meeting of his Security Council to explore the options for retaliatory strikes. We have no doubt that Russia’s Top Brass recommended tit-for-tat missile strikes beyond Ukraine’s borders as a form of equal payback. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed and the military stuck with its current strategy of obliterating critical infrastructure in cities across the country. The attacks on Ukraine’s fragile electrical grid are the essential preparation for the launching of a widely-anticipated winter offensive. Here’s more from an article at the World Socialist Web Site:
Yesterday’s drone attack on an airfield in Kursk marks a major escalation in NATO’s war against Russia….The location of the attacks and their implementation points once again to the direct involvement of the United States….The bombing of the Nord Stream pipelines…The explosions in Sevastopol’s naval harbour on October 29 (and) The November 15 explosions in a Polish farming village that killed two civilians….Every one of these actions reeks of covert US and NATO involvement, each more reckless and potentially dangerous than the last….A pattern is emerging—one in which the US and NATO keep pushing against Russia in order to test how far they can go without provoking a response from the Putin regime….The relentless and reckless escalation of the war by the United States carries with it the risk of the Russian government responding with a major escalation of its own, with potentially catastrophic consequences.” (“Drone attacks on Russian airbases: A major escalation in the war authored in Washington“, Chris Marsden, World Socialist Web Site)
Just hours after the third attack, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken delivered a statement denying any responsibility for the incident. He said:
“We have neither encouraged nor enabled the Ukrainians to strike inside of Russia.” Not surprisingly, Blinken’s denial fell well-short of a formal repudiation of the attack itself which one might have expected. More to the point, it appears that the US was directly involved given that “Both NATO and Russian observers (claim) US satellite involvement in attacks on Russian bases.” Here’s what they found:
Multiple military sources in NATO countries as well as Russia …..report that the reconditioned Russian Tu-141 drones that Ukraine launched at Russian air bases downlinked US satellite GPS data to hit their targets.
The 1970s-vintage Russian recon drones were converted into cruise missiles, fitted with new guidance systems and directed by American satellites, the sources said. Ukraine does not have the capability to guide missiles on its own, they added.
Russia’s Defense Ministry identified one of the weapons as the Tu-141 in a December 6 statement. According to Russian military sources, the Russians identified the Tu-141 from fragments recovered after the missiles struck Russia’s Dyagilevo and Engels air force bases.
If, contrary to Blinken’s denial, the United States provided guidance for the missile attack, then Washington must be well aware that this brings NATO forces to the brink of direct involvement in the Ukraine war and the Biden administration must be prepared to run that risk.” (“Military sources: Ukraine missiles used US guidance“, Asia Times)
So, what does this new incitement mean and how will it affect the conduct of the war?
We think Washington has adopted a new tactical approach that could be called “calculated recklessness”, that is, the US is launching meticulously planned attacks that are made to look like impulsive acts of aggression by their proxy, Ukraine. The objective of these attacks is to provoke Moscow into an overreaction, that is, retaliatory strikes on targets outside of Ukraine. That, in turn, could be used as a justification for NATO’s entrance into the conflict which, ostensibly, is Washington’s goal.
It appears, however, that Putin and his advisors have resisted the temptation to expand the war beyond the current battlespace. This is from an article at Southfront:
In response to Kiev’s attempts to disrupt the work of Russian aviation, Russian forces launched another massive strike at military and energy facilities throughout Ukraine. The Russian Ministry of Defense claimed that all 17 targets in Ukraine were hit. Explosions were reported in more than 10 regions of the country.
Strikes on infrastructure facilities led to another collapse of the entire energy system of Ukraine. Due to the imbalance in the system, a wave of emergency power outages is still rolling across the country, accompanied by massive accidents in the power grid...
The lack of electricity, water and communications throughout the country is accompanied by loud statements from Kiev that the Ukrainian Air Defense allegedly successfully intercepted almost all Russian missiles.” (“Kiev plays dangerous games with Russian long-range aviation”, Southfront)
In other words, Putin has not been baited into the escalation that Washington seeks, but that doesn’t mean he won’t call up additional reservists to form territorial defense units in multiple areas along Russia’s western flank. We think he will. Moscow can no longer ignore the threat of future attacks or incursions on its own soil. It must bulk up its manpower and prepare for the worst. Gradually, Russia is moving towards a full wartime mobilization.
What is particularly interesting about this new escalation is that contradicts the administration’s original commitment to prevent the conflict from spreading beyond Ukraine’s borders. This is from the WSWS:
The United States, having instigated and provoked a war that has killed tens of thousands of Ukrainians, has crossed not only Russia’s “red lines,” but its own…. In May, Biden published an op-ed in the New York Times entitled “What America Will and Will Not Do in Ukraine,” in which he stated that “We are not encouraging or enabling Ukraine to strike beyond its borders.” But Washington has done precisely that, giving targeting information, weapons, and logistics support that have allowed Ukraine to attack deep inside Russian territory.” (WSWS)
Washington’s promises means nothing. US actions are guided by self interest alone and by an insatiable thirst for power. That means we should expect to see similar provocations in the future as Washington pushes the envelope in its effort draw Russia into a wider war that will likely engulf the region. Here’s more from the WSWS:
The bombing of the Nord Stream pipelines… The explosions in Sevastopol’s naval harbour on October 29 (and) The November 15 explosions in a Polish farming village that killed two civilians…. Every one of these actions reeks of covert US and NATO involvement, each more reckless and potentially dangerous than the last…. The latest attacks deep inside Russian territory could have been orchestrated by sections of the US military, intelligence and political elite.. no matter how potentially disastrous the outcome of such brinksmanship might be.” (World Socialist Web Site)
The analysts at the WSWS have never accepted the fiction that the US is merely assisting Ukraine in its struggle against the Russian boogieman. From the very beginning, they have grasped that the conflict was largely a US concoction aimed at using proxies to weaken Russia in order to achieve its broader geopolitical goals. These latest attacks confirm that the United States is committed to resolving this crisis through the use of military force. That means a negotiated settlement is not only out-of-the-question, but is seen as anathema to Washington’s strategic objectives. As foreign policy analyst John Mearsheimer points out in a recent interview, there are no longer any “realistic options” for how the war can be brought to an end. The differences are irreconcilable, there is no willingness to compromise, and the US sees military confrontation as the solution. Bottom line: Escalation is inevitable.
Here’s part of a recent interview with Mearsheimer that I transcribed to underscore the hopelessness of the current situation in Ukraine which is bound to get worse before it gets better. I apologize for any mistakes in transcribing their comments.
—
Freddie Sayers– What are the realistic options now? (In other words, how can the war in Ukraine be brought to an end?)
John Mearsheimer– (19:40 minutes) There are no realistic options. We’re screwed… The conflict will grind-on and both sides will escalate. They have been escalating and where it leads is very hard to say. There’s no deal on the table that can be worked out here. There’s all this talk about the need for diplomacy…. but the question you have to ask yourself in this particular case is: If you do diplomacy can you work out a deal? And, in my opinion, there’s no deal to be worked out, and both sides are going to fight this one out…..
There are two big issues here: “One” is a “neutral Ukraine” and the other is the ‘territorial one‘ The Russians now have annexed 4 oblasts. That’s a big chunk of Ukrainian territory and the Russians now believe that territory belongs to them. Do you think the Russians will be willing to abandon that territory along with Crimea? I don’t see that happening. I don’t think the Russians have any intention of abandoning that territory…
The Ukrainians for their part, insist on getting that territory back, and the Americans, will not be willing to concede that territory to the Russians because it would appear that would a defeat for the West. The United States and its allies are ‘in this one’ to win. We are deeply committed. For us to back-off and give the Russians any major concessions is just unacceptable at this point….
That’s the territorial issue. Then there’s the question of whether or not Ukraine will be neutral. The Russians insist that Ukraine be neutral. The Ukrainians are saying, we are willing to be neutral but we need a guarantee for our security from someone. Well, the only one who can guarantee Ukrainian security is NATO and specifically, the United States…. but that would make Ukraine a de facto member of NATO and that’s unacceptable to the Russians. So, there’s no way you’re going to get a truly neutral Ukraine that is not affiliated with the west. That’s not going to happen and the Russians are not going to accept that.
So, what the Russians are going to do instead is create a dysfunctional rump state. and that’s what they’re doing now. That’s why they’ve taken all that territory, and that’s why they’re wrecking Ukraine…..
The two outcomes that we have to worry greatly about are, 1–where the Russians use nuclear weapons and, 2– where the United States comes into the fight … Because then, you have a great power war where the United States and Russia are actually fighting each other. And as Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence told the senate this past spring, the most likely scenario for the Russians to use nuclear weapons is if the NATO comes into the war. So, this is very dangerous….
There is a non-trivial chance that nuclear weapons will be used in Ukraine. If the Russians were to use nuclear weapons it would be most likely that they would use them in Ukraine. And Ukraine does not have nuclear weapons of its own so Ukraine would not be able to retaliate. against the Russians…
Furthermore, if Russia uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine, the US is not going to use nuclear weapons against Russia because that would lead to a general thermonuclear war… The great danger is that if the Russians use nuclear weapons in Ukraine that the west would retaliate with a massive conventional attack against Russian forces, General David Petraeus has said that if Russia uses nukes in Ukraine, the US should slam Russian conventional forces inside Ukraine and Russian naval forces in the Back Sea. If we were to do that, we would then have a great power war. NATO would be at war against Russia and as Avril Haines said, that is likely to lead to a nuclear war because the Russians would not be able to stand up to the Americans and their allies.
(If Russia does use nuclear weapons in Ukraine) then the wise response, and I think, the likely response would be that we would go to great lengths to shut-down the conflict. I think the use of nuclear weapons would shut down the conflict (because) it would become so clear at that point in time that we were in danger of creating a nuclear war between the superpowers that we would go to great lengths to shut-down. That would focus the mind in ways that are hard to imagine in the current context.
(Unfortunately) we are making it (the use of nukes) more and more likely. It’s important to realize that the more successful NATO and the Ukrainians are at defeating the Russians inside Ukraine and wrecking the Russian economy, the more likely it is that they will use nuclear weapons. And, again, you do not want to underestimate what great powers will do when they are desperate. …..(“John Mearsheimer: We’re playing Russian Roulette”, Unherd; 39:25 minutes)
Mearsheimer not only explains the irreconcilable differences between the two adversaries (Russia and the US), but also presents a very credible scenario in which the conflict could lead to a nuclear war. The fact that the Biden adminsitration has rejected diplomacy outright, makes that scenario all the more likely and, perhaps, unavoidable. Here’s more from Mearsheimer:
You know the Americans have the Monroe Doctrine…which says the western hemisphere is our ‘back yard’ and no distant great power is allowed to put military forces in the western hemisphere. No great power is allowed to form a military alliance with another country in the western hemisphere because –from the American perspective– it is intolerable to have a distant great power (from Europe or Asia) on our doorstep. Well, the same logic applies to the Russians. From the Russian perspective, the idea that you are going to have NATO right on your doorstep ….is unacceptable to them. The Russians couldn’t stop NATO from expanding in 1999 and they couldn’t stop it in 2004 because they were too weak… This is what America did to Russia when the Soviet Union broke apart. We shoved NATO expansion down their throat, but the fact is, the Russians viewed this as an existential threat. Ukraine in NATO was the brightest of all red lines for Russia. And if you look at the Monroe Doctrine you should not be surprised at how the Russians are reacting to what is going on in Ukraine.” (“John Mearsheimer: We’re playing Russian Roulette”, Unherd)
He’s right, isn’t he?
Polio Tuberculosis Diftheria and Shiftaniasis all once eradicated in the UK
are now back thanks to Government allowing in migrants
A freind of mine a single mum with 2 children is desperatley ill with Diftheria.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zryBRrOB6Wg
Dear Mr Putin, i know you are a bit busy at the moment, but if you could spare some time
to bomb these jewish areas of london. it would be a nice Chritmas present for us.
Golders Green and Stamford Hill. In particular in Harrow, Wembley, Edgware, Stanmore, Finchley, Ilford and Palmers Green, not forgetting the 3 Rothschild mansions
Thankyou much appreciated
The British People
The West is playing Russian roulette with 6 loaded chambers
Mike Whitney peddling more NWO bullshit.
There’s no mention that terror attacks were carried out by MI6 and UK special forces (SAS/SBS)?
NATO aren’t involved, or even approved these terror attacks. In fact, some big NATO members aren’t interested in any escalation in, or outside of UKraine.
Like I said yesterday. Putin needs to be removed. Russia now needs a leader who will make the right decisions.
Russia knows, the world knows, that the UK carried out acts of International terrorism. If Russia were to attack the UK, with conventional targeted strikes, such as a rust bucket carrier in Portsmouth Harbour, or even hit a few key sites on the UK mainland, with nukes, the UK will be on its own… the US won’t do diddly squat.
The French military has already told Macron that he’s on the line, and this is why Macron said ‘no French nukes will be used on Russia’. The Germans have already had some sort of coup attempt, but the military are ever so close to doing it themselves, because the French and German militaries don’t want their lands turned into radioactive wastelands.
Come to that, neither do the Amerikans, so a Russian strike on the UK Nazi terrorist state will result in NO ACTION by the US, or at least no direct action.
The so called wise leadership in Moscow has now become a massive weakness, and I very much doubt that many on Putin’s security Council meeting, agrees with him.
I now believe there’s a real move to remove Putin from power, but this will only take place once there is an agreed successor who will start taking the necessary retaliatory strikes against the UK and others who issue instructions, to strike deep into Russia.
Mark my words, Putin is on borrowed time. These retaliatory strikes, could take place, before we even know that Putin has gone.
The announcement of a new Russian leader could come literally as NWO targets are hit, thus throwing the NWO off guard, with them not having any idea what this new leader is willing to do.
Forget get all this crap about Putin being some dictatorial war monger. The NWO really does see Putin as just too human, and not capable of liquidating NWO scum.
After UK terrorist attacks, Merkel saying Minsk were war mongering stings, which we all knew, but hearing it from the nags own gob is pretty brutal, and now that Amerika green lights deep strikes into Russia, will have many in Russia now raging at Putin’s weakness. His next approval rating will be interesting, assuming Russian sheeple are slightly better informed.
BTW, Christmas Day would be a good Christian day to strike the heart of the Nazi beast. Never in all of known history, has there ever been a time when evil has faced its most able Christian enemy. The time is soon, or evil will win.
I was accused of being evil on this site the other day, which I took with a good laff, but the truth is, most on this site are evil. Sure, they argue this and that, but it’s always in terms of Jooow bashing, and never attacking the complicit Zionists. The Jews actually want you to attack them. They beat and kill their own, because it creates their narratives.
If Jooows control our systems, then attack the systems, attack the fake news, attack the one party state. In all my years on this site, I’ve never seen anyone advocate not voting. I can only say from what I have seen, and that is the fact that I am the only one to say that no one should vote???
Right Professor. Russia deserves a “Monroe Doctrine” /respect my sphere of influence as does China..as does Brazil, which has been targeted recently by communist election fraud as happened in the US in 2020..as does Australia, whose population is being destroyed by the mRNA “vaccine”..
MOSCOW
Flora solomon was a Woman used to ” honey trap ” important people for the Jewish Underground in w w 2.
Several prostitutes were used for this purpose, Kim Filbys wife Aileen threatened to go to the authorities with what she knew
Kim Philby had his wife murdered.
Lord Rothschild ran a whole fleet pf Left wing Homosexual deviants, Just about everyone beleived Philby was a spy for Stalin
but he was protected by Rothschild.
When in Moscow and an alcoholic, he beged to be allowed home, but no way would Rothschild ever allow any of the Apostles to come back
https://christiansfortruth.com/how-a-jewish-socialite-protected-kgb-spy-kim-philby-and-his-handler-victor-rothschild/
Two flavors of Russian roulette: one bullet and the rest empty, or one empty and the rest bullets.
Russia plays this game like a Go-player plays chess…like a chess-player plays checkers…like a checkers-player plays pickup-sticks.
America/NATO capitalizes on chaos the way the Federal Reserve capitalizes on debt, while Russia capitalizes on strategy/intrinsic-valuation (out of chaos comes order).
If Bitcoin gets value from computers competing to solve a puzzle, Russia gets strategy from puzzling its foes.
Lawrence Brown in a phone call to the Evening Standard news paper claimed responsibility
for the severe beating of two white teenagers in South London
Lawrence speaking for the black gang the Enfield Nigs
said Violence will continue until London is White Free
https://news.sky.com/story/line-18-gang-warfare-is-killing-londons-young-black-men-11447089
Further to my earlier comment about the UK one party Nazi state, the leader of the opposition is quoted in the Daily Fail as saying: “The nurses strike is unaffordable”.
So let’s get this straight. The NHS can close down for Covid, and the majority of nurses do sweet FA for months on end, and the UK Nazi deep state can afford to send a carrier strike group to the other side of the world, at tremendous cost, becauae this was a 3 month flag waving trip, and it cost $12 million per day to run one US carrier strike group, so you do the math? Sir Wanktard Estaishment Starmer said feck all when the UK Nazi state sent a carrier strike group to the South China Sea, just so they could wave the terrorist union jack at the laffing Chinese.
You can’t make this up. Mind you, Starmer would look quite good in a Nazi uniform.
Me, I’ve never seen a nurse working hard. They might be doing their job, but outside of A&E, nursing is a cake walk, and they already get paid too much, and the same can be said for doctors.
We don’t need, and we can’t afford nearly 700 MPs, or the fecking House of Lords, or the nearly 700 Privy Councillors. The UK is run by no more than 100 elite sheeple. Only about 20 of that 100 are elected, the rest hide in the shadows doing their thing. Even that Prada poodle Sunak doesn’t play any part in the deep state. As far as the deep state goes, Starmer is way more regarded than jumped up Sunak. You know that Sunak is a nobody, when the fake news rib him for the most inane things, such as: ‘Sunak was wearing a £400 paid of pumps.’ I mean. lol
never believe anything you see on British TV
every programme break we see adverts with children carrying pots some distance to collect water
and the advert ask we send £3 a month for them to have clean water.
Do you know where the money goes ?
it goes mostly to christian churches to send out volunteers to dig new wells
Because the black people there cant or wont dig their own.
Clayton Morris on Redacted asks what the Americans think they are doing. He says that the Russians invented winter. However, most people are quite naïve about actual warfare. For armies to move the wet months are the worst with troops and machinery getting bogged down. But once the rivers, creeks and marshes or frozen and solid then soldiers and machinery properly equipped and conditioned for the snow can sweep across virtually any relatively flat tract of land.
It was the Americans and the Brits with the backing of the money power which started this war and it is a war which they cannot finish on their terms unless it has been the Rothschild objective to make a deal with Russia in carving up the Ukraine, which has been IMF basket case. What is the cui bono to the seeming insanity? What are the cardinal interests of the Rothschild dynasty?
1. World financial and economic hegemony – That is the undisputed history.
2. A greater Israel, which entails knocking out all Mid East opposition to Israel and that means both Syria and Iran. The announced plans with China, another prodigy nation, is to make the ME the central trading hub between three continents – thus the billions and billions spent on the BRI (Belt & Road Initiative) – Those are the facts.
3. Establishing a Jewish state west of the Dnipro River which divides the Ukraine between east and west – The Jews in the Ukraine including the Ashkenazi’s were estimated to be between 40 and 60 thousand in a population of about 43 million only 10 years ago. Now in 2022 with characteristic Rothschild magic with numbers and money the European Jewish Congress estimates the number of Jews to be between 360,000 and 400,000.
https://jewishunpacked.com/ukraines-long-and-complicated-jewish-history/
The numbers actually started taking their quantum leaps around 2016 when the estimate went from about 49,000 to 179,000. This indeed is a very strange phenomena when ever since then most Jews with any common sense have been packing their bags and getting out of the place.
Perhaps to rule any nation when you control the finances and are able to accumulate most of the major assets, the media, and the governments under your pay and control then all you really need is to have or to fake 1% of the population loyal to your cause. In any case despite the fact that Rothschild Jews are running the Ukraine and the US war machine, most likely their priorities are #1 and #2 above, and by fomenting a war with Russia in their control of the Ukraine, through money, the CIA, MI6, US & UK special ops since 2014, their primary intention is likely either to trade off much of the Ukraine to Russia in exchange for a Russian abandonment of Syria, or bog Russia down with a war they can scarcely afford so that it cannot defend Syria.
‘He’s right, isn’t he?’
There is no doubting that Prof. Mearsheimer’s is a great mind. His diagnostic portraits of the US and Russia are substantiated and convincing, as are his processes of extrapolation that deliver his conclusions about what will/cannot-but happen. These extrapolations are deft and unfailingly valid. He is right also about the US and Russian core existential positions being incendiary, not reconcilable. So I answer thus: Yes, he is right… but only within the confines of Mike Whitney’s transcript.
However, earlier in this interview, Prof. Mearsheimer expounded upon the huge nationalism of the Ukrainian population that is untiring and unrelenting in the face of the threat of extinction, just like nationalism has been in other contexts. Here I think he is wrong. In fact, the Ukrainian population is vanquished and crying from the heart of the bereaved, of the cold and hungry, and of the hopeless:
Shortly after Ursula von der Leyen came out with her ‘100,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed by Russia’ and got a drubbing for it, Colonel Douglas Macgregor gave us the information that upwards of 300,000 letters have come to the Ukrainian authorities in which the relatives of frontline soldiers demand to know the status of their sons husbands and who are not contacting home. (Presumably, they are dead.) The perfidy of the nation’s leadership that does not disclose such information certainly does not nurture nationalism.
And have we ever seen images of Ukrainians celebrating their wartime President? Hardly. That is left to Time Magazine.
Prof. Mearsheimer is not right in positing vehement Ukrainian nationalism as a driving force of the Russia-Ukraine war.
Actually, it’s Ukraine which is in a really desperate need of a new more rational government than the one that they have now.
One that understands the importance of maintaining friendly relations with its eastern neighbour.
Carl Jones: ‘There’s no mention that terror attacks were carried out by MI6 and UK special forces (SAS/SBS)?’ December 12, 2022 at 9:21 am
Colonel Macgregor said this recently. I think it was on the last Judge Napolitano-Macgregor vid. that Rixon uploaded. Macgregor left this comment till last, without elaboration.
Was the Kremlin just pretending that it thought the Ukrainians had launched the drone over some 200 km? The silence that has settled on this event is very scary.
Carl Jones,,, Your quote: Putin needs to be removed. Russia now needs a leader who will make the right decisions.
Whom do you have in mind to take V Putin’s Job ?? Khordokovsky maybe ?? Ohh I know, you’re thinking of Navalny ?? Right …Well, how about the Time Man of the Year ?? That great world class statesman Zelensky maybe ??
More US and Nato blather. It is the US and Nato who would lose in a conventional war with Russia,,, it is they who are instigating and talking nukes. It is they that would set off a nuke and blame Russia in a false flag.
Nothing,,, I mean absolutely NOTHING can be believed by the US and Western thugs.
Sophie Johnson: what on earth are you on about? Did say someone said this, or did I quote? No, I did not. I say what I like. Mostly it is what I believe, sometimes I say things for other purposes.
Fred B: Clayton Morris and his wench are propagandists, just like Michael Moore. Love to know who funds their little operation. lol
I despair we all educate each other on the comments but some idiot thinks the UK is run by nazis ?
( National Socialists ) so damn wrong
since the 1930s exactly as Rothschild promised we are communist
his quote made in 1936 is here
” By the year 2000 the UK and USA will be communist
it may not be called that but thats what it will be “
The problem is NATO seems to want a war just like the USA wanted war with Germany in the 40s.
The USA navy was opening fire on German ships long before war was declared in teh hope that the Germans would fire back and facilitate the open war the JEW S A (USA) wanted.
It is the same today with warmongers like the slimeball Boris Johnson provoking things.
People like Mr Johnson only care about themselves. Is it not possible for Russia to assasinate people like him.
I am English and I would realy like Mr Johnson and other warmongers to start myseriously dying.
Carl Jones–your first comment was better than your second one; somehow, I knew you’d spoil it
Lewis Jones: you are entitled to your opinion.
Yours is a terrible comment, because they are different. They were never intended to be compared, but heck, if that floats your boat.
kelvin ballsaker: the UK Nazi regime is suggesting that bust banks be KIND to mortgage debters. This is the thing, thicko sheeple who take out mortgages should pay them back as fecking contracted. I’m sure Hunt the C##t would pay their mortgages for them, if he could get away with it.
The reason why the UK is a Nazi regime, is that the UK funded Nazi Germany, and Hitler was a British agent. We now have Jew running a Nazi ragime supported by the UK Nazi ragime. Do try and keep up, or are you just a code-bot?
Carl Jones
You have forgotten to take your prescribed medication for schizophrenia yet again, and so lecture the “thicko sheeple” who fail to see or understand your deluded insane ramblings.
John: don’t embarrass yourself. Why would I waste my time lecturing the thicko sheeple? #trollbot