Nick Kollerstrom – Terror on the Tube Feb 27, 2022
In a nutshell, Russian troops have got no legal right at all to be storming across Ukraine. This could finish off Putin and his party, United Russia. I phoned a pal of mine in Moscow and he said the Muscovites he knew were appalled by what he was doing, and that Putin had ‘lost it.’
Initially on 22.2.22 we were told that ‘peacekeeper’ forces were being invited in by the newly-ratified People’s Republics, to try and stop eight years of bombardment, genocide and ethnic cleansing. If Putin had just stopped with that as his war aim I reckon he could have succeeded. It is simply explicable, papers would understand it. Russian troops would only go say 20-30 km from the borders of the two mini-states, because that would be far enough to stop the shelling. Anyhow, that ‘peacekeeper’ war-aim definitely cannot involve encircling and attacking the capital city, Kiev, can it?
What operating instructions were given to the Russian military? Why do they imagine they are in Ukraine? As the whole world comes round to support Ukraine, as armed support flows in from all corners of the earth, Russia must swiftly recognize the impossibility of its goal – whatever that is.
NOTE: the massive ethnic cleansing of Eastern Ukraine has been ignored by the western media. O, its just Slavs ie Russians who are being cleared out. So we don’t mind that. Only one country in Europe is bothered about a continual, ongoing, successful genocide program and that is Russia. Eastern Ukraine was the powerhouse of the country, with loads of advanced industry – now it’s desolate. Walk down its empty roads and see the bomb-shattered houses, schools, public buildings. For eight years its inhabitants have heard the thud, thud of missiles and their explosions, every other day.
America helpfully gave Ukraine three billion dollars of ‘lethal aid’ and so the missiles now raining down upon Belarus and Lugansk are far more deadly. But nobody cares – except the Russians! Listen to your radio, they may just allude to a ‘civil war’ in the east of Ukraine. No it really isn’t that – it is Genocide as defined by the 1947 Genocide Convention, the destruction and eradication of a people and a culture. I’ve heard a figure of around fifteen thousand killed in these states over the years by the shelling.
Back in 2014, the very year of the Neo-Nazi coup staged in Ukraine by America, the UNHCR (Human Rights council) reported in June that ‘since the start of the year around 110,000 Ukrainians have arrived in Russia.’ (Source: Ukraine in the Crosshairs, William Dunkerley, 2014, page 152) That has been ongoing and Russia has had to cope with the massive flood of refugees. It has grown worse just before the present crisis. As of now one million inhabitants of the two mini-states have applied for Russian passports, so they can emigrate. Europe just does not care about this, does it? Only RT reports on this issue, so right let’s just ban RT. Sure, that solves the problem.
So Europe has an explicitly pro-genocide and pro-ethnic cleansing policy. Normally one might expect criticism of a state that continually bombs its own people, but O no, the EU actively supports this process by loading up Kiev with weapons – priming it to blow for WW3.
The more Europe is guided by the USA in its military postures, the sooner we will arrive at WW3. Europe makes endless false accusations against Russia [1] so that dialogue is hardly possible, plus it has expelled its Russian diplomats. This is brutal and barbaric behaviour.
In all this we need to remember how congenial a new war in Europe would be for America. The present conflict has been brewed up in order to stop the Nordstream-2 pipeline. America cannot endure the idea of friendship between Germany and Russia: NATO exists to stop this. The great dream and hope of Putin for friendship and cultural exchange developing between Europe and Russia has been successfully thwarted by the US-UK, to ensure that the trillions keep being spent on armaments.
I predict that, alas, Putin won’t live long after this, his party United Russia will fall , it cannot win another election – and Russia itself may even break up with the trauma, of being condemned by all the world. I always admired Vlad – yes I confess – but his catastrophic or cataclysmic misjudgement here is ruining everything.
Had he stuck to his initially-defined aim, that was honourable and possibly achievable. He could have said, ‘The Kiev government can end this conflict any time it wants, by ceasing to bombard Belarus and Lughansk. Then we will leave Ukraine’ The media would have understood this and he would have had a clear exit strategy – whereas now he has none. Thereby his ‘operation’ would be legal – and here we are talking about mainly the Hague Convention (1907), the Nuremberg Principles (1940s) and the Geneva Protocols (1977) as having laid down the basic ‘laws of war’, the idea that some defensive military actions are legal.
But he didn’t do that. What is truly terrifying here is the way one old man can decide what the Russian army will do. Russia has a tradition of strong Czars or kings and here we see its undoing. He announces that he wants to ‘de-Nazify’ a country – run by a couple of Jews! No way is that a legitimate war aim. Perhaps Putin’s great, final achievement is to unify all of the world as we have never seen before in condemnation of his act.
The UN Security Council has just voted 11:1 in condemnation of Russia (China abstained) and now the General Assembly vote is due.
Slow, gradual healing has to take place in that part of the world. It lost what, seven million was it in the WW2? … and let’s not go into who was responsible for that. We need more empathetic, feminine Ministries of Peace able to sense the pain and insecurity of the Other. Maybe Ukraine will be like Czechoslovakia, a put-together country at the end of WW1 that just did not want to exist as a unity and split into two parts. There is deep history here, where Kiev in the ninth century was where the original Rus nation began to exist. Belarus and Russia both take their names from it.
- NK, ‘The Novichok Chronicles, The Skipal and Navalny Hoaxes compared’ 2021
Chill out a bit.
“De-Nazify” here means De=NATO or even De-America which is a correct aim for Putin and I think that’s the game here.
Putin does have a case in that NATO is crapping up his sphere of influence. It might be ugly but that’s how geopolitics works.
Nick means well but he is just a stupid old fool!!!
Oh dear Nick, writing propaganda for MI6?
In case you didn’t know, UKraine was already a NATO state and then Zelensky said he wanted nukes to hit Russia.
I only got part way through your article, so you might have flipped the argument, but the fact you use one phone call to a friend in Moscow as evidence… Russia is crawling with 5th column trouble makers.
Russia has a massive border to protect, add thousands of kilometres with a UKraine NATO state was not sustainable.
I hope Finland says it wants to join NATO…
You were at those Ian Fantom 9/11 meetings. While you weren’t rude, you gave off this sense of ‘he’s an outsider’, well yes, very true, I don’t bat for the deep state & I’ve not been invited on TV to be mocked by presstitutes. Says a lot in my book.
I can say this now, because I don’t think they’ll allow this website to stay up much longer, even though it is a disinfo pipe.
The correct analysis of Putin is that his move into UKriane signals the end of the Washington unipolar world, the balance of power has tipped away from the West, even Pakistan backs Russia with a new trade deal.
I have lived in london for all my 84 years
i have sen countless white families whose fathers and grand fathers fought the racist government wars for it being ethnically cleansed as we bring in yet more migrants refugees economic spongers and foreign criminal toerags
our governments are doing this to us
its own people
Professionals are a waste of time. I am not writing a lot to try to connect Kollerstrom with reality. It would have happened already if it were possible.
I’m no longer sure what the Russian war objectives are. Nor have I much of a clue on what is happening on the ground, other than that it’s big. The British state media, and quasi-state media, can be relied on only to present the US position and shower us with a pack of lies on a whole range of big issues every day, whilst RT obviously will not disclose anything that would hinder the Russian side in the war.
I can, however, see some logic in the mission creep. The two mini-state republics do not occupy the whole of the Donbass region; their original borders have been pushed back by the Kiev side over the past 8 years. So could the Russians go into the remaining territories without taking action throughout Donbass? I don’t know. But also, there’s a question of whether they could have done either without neutralising the air capabilities of the Kiev side. Once they do that, then what? Troops? Hitler made the mistake of trying to retake the lost territories without realising that you cannot wage war on part of a country without being at war with the whole country. The Russians managed to do it in Crimea though. I was expecting something similar in the Donbass republics, until I looked at the map.
It may be that there was some ambiguity in what Putin et al were saying, in that they possibly weren’t aiming at a general take-over of Ukraine, but just to do what was necessary and then leave. From there on it gets fuzzy. How do you capture the Kiev leaders and put them on trial without a complete invasion? It’s possible he was issuing a warning to NATO/EU that they should pull out of Ukraine, by saying that they had no plans for an (unprovoked) invasion, but unless NATO/EU pulled out he would get them out. It seems that that is what is happening.
I see…
It definitely could turn out to be Russia’s Vietnam or Afghanistan revisited I suppose.
Or worse; the beginning of the end of Russia.
The bear a zoological attraction…
WWIII might appear to be more palatable for Russia instead, if the West is up for it?
Next couple of weeks will reveal if Russia is serious?
So many writers get upset about “genocide and ethnic cleansing” but when it comes to the world-wide genocide and ethnic cleansing of Britons, Germans, Celts, and Swedes it’s FULL STOP. Why? The world-wide genocide of white people is an undertaking of International Jewry and they are either the bought pens of Judah or afraid for their lives or paychecks.
The breakaway republics as they stand do not reflect their rightful territory. The Kiev regimen front line is in ethnic Russian speaking areas, so Russia is encircling this front, but must do so with great care they want to minimise lost of civilian life and damage to property. This takes time.
Clearly the stiff resistance is from Nazi battalions, SAS, other special forces, and MI6 mercenaries. Most of which will escape when all is lost. Everyone chant ‘thermobaric, thermobaric, thermobaric… my God I hate violence, but sometimes there’s nothing left but to do but fight.
Kollerstrom (whom I admit has done sterling work in the past) states:”In a nutshell, Russian troops have got no legal right at all to be storming across Ukraine.”, then goes on to give every reason the Russians must and should be there.
Perhaps I’m too thick to see how these dots connect.
I also disagree with Professor Kollestrom that the world is united in condemnation of Russia. There used to be something called the “silent majority”. I think there are a lot of us still here and we don’t condemn them. Nato has been brewing this up for years , as we all know. I wish Russia Godspeed and hope they finish this quickly , alienating the smallest number of Ukrainians as possible.
Hmmm…the author must have missed taking his medication today. It appears to me that Russia had been planning for a war event and if it does takes place, they have probably planned various scenarios and picked up the one that serves their interest.
Hence, they did not stop at Donetsk. They must go all the way to Kiev and remove all traces of human and institution threats (and does not have to be execution, perhaps a simple and free one way ticket out of Kiev to anywhere in the world and do not comeback is sufficient).
Russia has sent a clear message to the West and NATO and their stooges. we will all reap what we sow.
I’m not sure what Nick Kollerstrom, a man I generally admire, is on about. He is obviously aware of the Coup waged on the Ukraine in 2014, NATO moving closer to Russia despite their promises and the placing of missiles around Russia. Not to mention the hundreds of American military sites surrounding Russia. Just how much was Russia going to take?
Strange, its been a week now since Russia invaded Ukraine & still no declaration of war from Britain or France. Yet they only waited two days to declare war on Germany in 1939…oh that’s right, they only declare war on their real enemies & do nothing to their fellow yarmulke wearing cult members. That’s because its all a staged coordinated production as the Zionist-Communist Cryptocrats direct a new war to kill off more white gentiles to accelerate the arrival of their mongrel “Messiah”.
“We need more empathetic, feminine Ministries of Peace able to sense the pain and insecurity of the Other.”
A very curious statement indeed. It’s not obvious how this proposition proceeds from the narrative of the article, nor how such a logical fallacy could be considered to amount to worthwhile thesis.
Two words suffice to reveal the redundancy of this psychologically trite romanticism: Victoria and Nuland.
Yes, her. The nestling bosom of world diplomacy, whose betazoid perceptiveness has informed eight years worth of peaceful progress in Russian-Ukrainian relations. Dear, oh dear, Mr. Kollerstrom.
Quite what Orwell’s Ministry of Peace does to assist with the credibility of the conjecture, furthermore, is beyond me.
Perhaps it would have been helpful if the author had elaborated upon his assertion more fully. Who was it, that he actually had in mind, when he penned such matinée fluff? I’m guessing that it wasn’t Myra Hindley, nor the Countess Elizabeth Bathory, who tortured and killed as many as 600 young girls, during the latter half of the sixteenth century, in Hungary.
I have an intuition, however, that the paradigm aspired to in Nick Kollerstrom’s thoughts as he wrote those lines, was that of the quintessentially genteel, loving and nurturing, apotheosis of femininity, Dame Cressida Dick.
Go on, admit it, Nick. You fancy her.
Unfortunately, the Russian sheeple are just as dumb as the sheeple everywhere else. They believe that America is the land of freedom, milk and honey. They believe that Britain is ‘free’ and ‘democratic’.
Their vision of the West is at least 50 years out of date. They have no idea that it is a bankrupt, post industrial wasteland, run by Jews and shabbas goyim, rapidly sliding into third world anarchy.
They do not understand that the West hates Russia, that the Western goyim want them dead. They do not see that Ukraine was to be a launch pad for Western nukes, nukes that would be falling on them.
> They do not understand that the West hates Russia, that the Western goyim want them dead.
I don’t hate them. And I don’t want them dead.
I want the jews, the governments, and all the rich people everywhere dead.
I like stuff Nick has done but not this. Russia has the right to be in Ukraine its called self preservation the crazies wanted to put nukes there so they had to go. Is the pal he rang one of the 5th column that Paul Craig Roberts has warned of frequently ?People who would see their country go down the tube just so they could get their snouts in the trough, the West has ample number of these. My guess is Russian intel has found a possible false flag in the offing maybe chemical and Putin had no choice, Syria act 2 ? Sorry Nick you way off the mark
I phoned a pal of mine in Moscow and he said the Muscovites he knew were appalled by what he was doing, and that Putin had ‘lost it.’
I would expect that a majority 90% of those Muscovite have name ending with, berg, stein, & witz, ….
VLAD IS NOT MAD !
THE WEST IS MAD + HAUGHTY !
@ franz…
Presumably one would view those that employ Nazi’s are Nazi’s… but in this cast that would be untrue…
The Azov’s (for want of a more useful descriptor of these so called Nazis) are in fact Ukrainian nationalists that have international volunteers like Hitler’s SS and employ WW2 symbolism and Banderism as totems.. however that is where similarity ends..
The big question is why are they supporting an obviously ‘jewish’ regime if they are National Socialists?..
Well.. one would have to conclude they aren’t National Socialists but they are Ukrainian nationalists (of the type that ‘teamed up’ with the Germans in the war against Stalin) engaged in an ethnic conflict..
It would be more useful to compare it with Serbs and Croats (another stink stirred up by NATO with similar aims) …
these Slavs are very tribal which is an admirable characteristic.. therefore problematical to the Anglo Zion NWO..