Who Are The Illuminati?

Who Are The Illuminati?

By Richard Stone 

“A loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires” (Paul Simon).
“The world is governed by far different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes” (Benjamin Disraeli).
“Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes the laws” (Mayer Rothschild).

Conspiracy theory is the theory that most of the world is secretly governed by a small group of men who operate behind the scenes. Conspiracy theory is now an accepted turn of phrase but sometimes one hears the expression, sometimes whispered rather than spoken. “The Illuminati”.

What does this mean? Who are the Illuminati? They are, in essence, a cartel of international bankers and industrialists based in Western Europe and North America. The names of certain families persist over long periods of time. Some of the most important names are Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Lazard, Warburg, Schroder and Schiff.

The pivotal family is probably the house of Rothschild, the descendants of Mayer Rothschild (1743 – 1812) of Frankfurt. The male descendants of this family, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. The family established banking institutions in Vienna, London, Naples and Paris as well as Frankfurt. Ever since the middle ages, these families have been building their power by lending money at rates of interest to the monarchies and governments of Europe who were forever in debt, particularly in times of war. Sooner than tax the population to raise funds, always an unpopular measure, they usually preferred to borrow money from the money-lenders. This was the birth of the concept “the national debt.” The countries of the world are forever in debt but where there is a debtor there is a creditor – who is this money owed to? It is owed to this coterie of international bankers.

By the nineteenth century the power of the Rothschild family was immense. They increased their wealth with great cunning and cleverness, while maintaining a low public profile. A notable example of their methods was their exploitation of the battle of Waterloo. The Rothschilds had spies watching the course of the battle and as soon as became evident that Wellington had won, a Rothschild agent traveled at maximum speed to London, arriving hours before Wellington’s own messenger. Rothschild received the messenger and began conspicuously selling his stocks. The whole stock exchange assumed that Wellington had lost and Napoleon had won so everybody started selling, at this point, other Rothschild agents bought up huge stocks at give-away prices. Thus an already massive fortune was massively increased.

The Rockefeller family may be equally important. The pivotal figure in this family was J.D.Rockefeller, who made his fortune out of Standard Oil or Esso in Ohio and Pennsylvania. He also controlled the railroads. When rival road transport systems were established he attempted to block them by parking his trains across the roads at level crossings. His basic business technique was the elimination of competitors at all costs, followed by the establishment of a monopoly, followed by profit taking. He rapidly gained a name for huge wealth, secrecy and hard and dirty business practice. In his later years he had a harsh and gaunt appearance, so to counter his bad “public image” JD more or less invented the PR industry. He had short films of himself made, calculated to charm the public, himself playing golf with a pretty little child for instance. This film was shown on TV recently. It has a rather false and amateurish air but was very effective with the public of the day.

The Rockerfellers currently have controlling interests in Exxon (the world’s biggest company) and the Chase Manhattan Bank, which turns over trillions of dollars a week. With so many billions in their hands already, what does more money mean? Obviously it means more power and more control over other human beings, but to what end and in whose name?

Apparently in the name of Lucifer, the fallen angel also known as the bringer of light, hence the name “Illuminati”, which means “the enlightened ones”. Lucifer is also known for the characteristics of pride, deception and impermanence. The illuminati were apparently founded in Bavaria in 1770 by one Adam Weisshaupt, a student of the Jewish philosopher Mendelsohn, and backed by the Rothschild family. The society has always been based on the lodges of Freemasonry, which was taken over at the highest levels during the course of the eighteenth century by agents of the Illuminati. Freemasonry is a very secretive institution, to the extent that members at one level do not know what members at another level are doing. Hence it is an organisation which is full of bonhomie and good deeds at the lower and middle levels, while its motives and deeds at the highest levels veer towards the dark side.

Both Freemasonry and Judaism have strong roots in the ancient Egyptian systems of religious belief, and it was this very similarity which attracted the illuminati to Freemasonry, for most of them were Jewish. It is a source of controversy today to speculate whether or not they are still predominantly Jewish. No unfair racism intended – they either are or they aren’t. Certainly there is much evidence to suggest that they are not, George Bush for instance, a prominent illuminati figure and obviously not Jewish.

The all seeing eye on the U.S. Dollar Bill

The United States of America is more or less a creation of Freemasonry. The symbol of Freemasonry was placed on the cornerstone of the Whitehouse, while the assembled Freemasons lodges stood and watched the ceremony. The famous all-seeing eye in the pyramid appears on the one dollar bill. It is one of the main symbols of Freemasonry. This bill also bears the inscription, in Latin, “1776, the year of inception of a new world order”. If one joins the dots formed by the stars of the thirteen original states one obtains an exact Star of David.

The goal of the IlIuminati is total control of the world. The only nations, which are holding out against their power, are some Islamic nations and China but this resistance is limited because the Illuminati have crushing economic power.

There are certain methods of subjugation and control which are indispensable to this power. The first is, of course, complete control over all financial systems, all borrowing and lending. All banks, all building societies, all insurance companies have to be under their control. At the lowest level even the smallest bank will be forced to toe the line. At the highest level the World Bank decides the fate of countries. It is an interesting and amazing fact that both the Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England are controlled by these Illuminati dynasties, in spite of the names of these banks, which suggest that they are run for public benefit. It is said that both Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy wanted to change this system.

The second essential component is control of the media. It is controlled through business fashion. If the board meeting, or the management meeting, or the sales meeting, or the training meeting suggests that facts should be presented in a certain way, who is going to present them differently? There is an implied threat to one’s job and one’s career. Few people would gladly face demotion, retrenchment or the dole and most people are so ambitious they will do nearly anything “reasonable” to court favour with their superiors. This is how business is controlled and the media is the most important part of business, for it controls people’s minds. People are very suggestible and often lend more credence to what they see on “the box” than to what happens on their own street. The Illuminati know this and use this suggestibility factor to the full. Lenin’s key move during the Russian revolution was the capture of the radio station.

The third factor in the control system is the universities, and through them the whole education system. Particular effort is put into the schools of sociology, politics, economics and education, hence “liberal” systems of education which are often degenerate and even violent. Their men are inserted into the universities through the power of funding by big business. They then spread their influence downwards through tertiary to secondary and primary education.

The fourth factor is the enormous influence wielded by two similar organisations, The Council of Foreign Relations in the USA and the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England. These institutions are schools for statesmen, Illuminati statesmen. They are the stamping grounds of men such as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinksi and Lord Carrington. These two “think tanks” have a crucial influence on all US and British governments, no matter which party is “in power”. The statesmen produced by these institutions can and do decide the fate of nations.The tax-exempt foundations are also instruments of Illuminati power. The Ford foundation and the Rockefeller foundation are two prominent examples of this type of “charitable” institution. They were heavily involved in supporting various communist powers when the cold war was at its height. Communism versus capitalism arms race = more money and power for the Illuminati. So these are some of the structures through which the Illuminati work but what methods do they use?

Pitting one side against the other, using a theory devised by Hegel, which is: Thesis versus antitheses – synthesis.

Every force tends to have an opposite counterforce. The conflict between the two results in a new situation, the synthesis. The illuminati make it their business to be the synthesis. Thus no problem situation is ever “nipped in the bud” it is rather fostered and used, just as the Soviet Union was fostered and used.

The insertion of immigrant groups into countries is a variation of this divide and rule process. Each group can be played off against the other.

“Double talk” and “double think”. George Orwell knew instinctively what was going on when he invented these two expressions:
I categorically deny = it will happen a bit later.
Peace = war by another means.

To say one thing and do another is fundamental to Illuminati practice. They believe that the public will accept these lies through laziness and wishful thinking. Unfortunately they are usually correct.

“Keep them busy busy busy, back on the farm with the other animals.” We are kept so busy with business (or busyness) that we do not understand or participate in the decisions and events that will crucially affect our future.

When a real power move is made it is usually done secretly and suddenly often with the pretence that nothing has happened. There is preparation for opposition, but conflict is often not necessary as most people have been trained to be so passive that they will probably not create an effective opposition.

Use of front men in important positions. These front men have the characteristic of “servile obedience”, probably because of a blot or blots on their character which they are anxious to conceal. Most of the Presidents of the USA fall into this category. The current situation springs to mind. Behind the opponent stands the man with real power, who has long been groomed for this position. Men like Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and George Bush are in this category.

The assassination of opposing leaders as quietly and as secretly as possible, so as to simulate a natural death. If this is not possible due to time constraints or other limited circumstances, surrogates are used and the lines of suspicion are covered by deception, false accusation and if necessary, multiple assassinations. Induced heart attacks, fake motor accidents and apparent suicides are also favoured methods of assassination.

Social engineering. An easily manipulated rabble is what is required. Mixed population groups with weak morals, weak traditions, low educational standards and weak group willpower are the aim. Those with special aptitudes can be taken out and trained to serve the illuminati for technical purposes, security purposes or as part of the propaganda apparatus. The middle class will become surplus to requirements and will be reduced to relative poverty.

Mockery and submission of the manners and morals of societies which show any resistance. Control of the media, the fashion industries and the education systems are essential components in this strategy. “Free love”, the cult of youth, mockery of the Christian and Muslim faiths also fall into this category. “I don’t give a rats ass about Jesus Christ” is one recent masterpiece from one of Hollywood’s biggest starts. He probably didn’t realise what he was saying, which makes him a “useful idiot’. A “useful idiot” is much more effective than a conscious supporter. By these means of subversion societies and nations are conquered from within and open battle is usually not necessary.

The conduct of unrelenting economic warfare. This is the real war and continues even while the bombs are falling and the bullets are flying. The important part is the control of the enemy’s economy after the conflict. The recent economic crash in the far-eastern countries is in reality an assertion of the Illuminati’s economic power, an expression of economic dominance. The Illuminati now control 10-15% of the Japanese economy. This is public knowledge, that is what has been bought at bargain prices. In reality they probably control much more.

Control and exploitation of the standards of public health. The sale of prescription drugs is a huge business generating mega profits. Medical operations and treatments can also be very profitable to big business. These extreme treatments have their place but are over-used for the sake of profit.

In fact big business, particularly the big drug companies, have a vested interest in the ill health of the population. These companies, working through the US Food and Drug Administration, have tried to suppress the health food industry. In this they have largely failed but now the game is to own it and control it so that health foods can only be afforded by the elite.

Argument through defamation of character. The factual debate is ignored while characters are defamed. This is usually a very effective technique as many human beings are very suggestible and seem reluctant to use their reasoning abilities. Thus a “smear campaign” can easily draw attention away from the facts.

To conclude, it is growing increasingly evident that a world government is developing, and many would say that it is probably no bad thing, but few have asked for what purpose this “new world order” is created. Nor have they asked themselves what the consequences will be. These consequences (or some of them) will probably be as follows:

• Increasing profits for big business, increasing poverty for the middle class (who they despise). A rapid decline in moral standards and the promotion of social decay.

• Transience. Jobs that don’t last; neighbourhoods that don’t last.

• Increasing levels of crime and violence.

• Decline and demise of public services; replacement by private enterprise – good service for the few who can afford it.

• Ongoing ill health for the bulk of the population because of stress; poor quality foods; food additives; genetic engineering; pollution and drugs. There may be good health for those who can afford it – only the rich and well informed.

• The gradual phasing out of national governments, which will have powers more like the regional governments of today.

• The formation of several conglomerations like the United States.

In time a world leader will be announced, a real one this time. A pity he will have a cynical contempt for the most of humanity. Do we deserve it?

5 Ways Smart Phones Are Dumbing People Down

Truthstream Media — July 7, 2017

Phil Giraldi – Neocons Clamor for More Goy Blood

henrymakow.com — Sept 20, 2017

Join-the-US-army-and-Fight-for-Zionism-230x300In 2003, an Israeli newspaper credited 25 American-Jewish intellectuals with starting the Iraq war which has since cost $2.5 trillion and over 200,000 lives. Former CIA analyst Philip Giraldi says the same group is clamoring for another war, against Iran.
“These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne warriors who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do the fighting and dying.”
[Makow note- Please direct any resentment you may feel at the many Jews Giraldi mentions here, rather than Jews in general, most of whom are not consulted.]

America’s Jews are Driving America’s Wars 

by Phil Giraldi — (abridged by henrymakow.com)

I spoke recently at a conference on America’s war party where afterward an elderly gentleman came up to me and asked, “We all know it’s American Jews with all their money and power who are supporting every war in the Middle East? Shouldn’t we start calling them out?”
My answer is always the same: any organization… knows that to touch the livewire of Israel and American Jews guarantees a quick trip to obscurity. Jewish groups and deep pocket individual donors not only control the politicians, they own and run the media and entertainment industries, meaning that no one will hear about or from the offending party ever again. They are particularly sensitive on the issue of so-called “dual loyalty,” particularly as the expression itself is a bit of a sham since it is pretty clear that some of them only have real loyalty to Israel.
Most recently, some pundits, including myself, have been warning of an impending war with Iran. To be sure, the urging to strike Iran comes from many quarters, to include generals in the Administration who always think first in terms of settling problems through force, from a Saudi government obsessed with fear over Iranian hegemony, and, of course, from Israel itself. But what makes the war engine run is provided by American Jews who have taken upon themselves the onerous task of starting a war with a country that does not conceivably threaten the United States. They have been very successful at faking the Iranian threat, so much so that nearly all Republican and most Democratic congressmen, as well as much of the media, seem to be convinced that Iran needs to be dealt with firmly, most definitely by using the U.S. military, and the sooner the better.
BILL-K.jpg
And while they are doing it, the issue that nearly all the Iran haters are Jewish has somehow fallen out of sight, as if it does not matter. But it should matter. A recent article in the New Yorker on stopping the impending war with Iran strangely suggests that the current generation “Iran hawks” might be a force of moderation regarding policy options given the lessons learned from Iraq. The article cites as hardliners on Iran David Frum, Max Boot, Bill Kristol (above) and Bret Stephens.
Daniel Larison over at The American Conservative has a good review of the New Yorker piece entitled “Yes, Iran Hawks Want Conflict with Iran,” which identifies the four above cited hawks by name before describing them as “…a Who’s Who of consistently lousy foreign policy thinking. If they have been right about any major foreign policy issue in the last twenty years, it would be news to the entire world. Every single one of them hates the nuclear deal with Iran with a passion, and they have argued in favor of military action against Iran at one point or another. There is zero evidence that any of them would oppose attacking Iran.”
And I would add a few more names, Mark Dubowitz, Michael Ledeen and Reuel Marc Gerecht of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; John Podhoretz of Commentary magazine; Elliot Abrams of the Council on Foreign Relations; Meyrav Wurmser of the Middle East Media Research Institute; Kimberly Kagan of the Institute for the Study of War; and Frederick Kagan, Danielle Pletka and David Wurmser of the American Enterprise Institute. And you can also throw into the hopper entire organizations like The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Hudson Institute. And yep, they’re all Jewish, plus most of them would self-describe as neo-conservatives. And I might add that only one of the named individuals has ever served in any branch of the American military – David Wurmser was once in the Navy reserve. These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne warriors who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do the fighting and dying.

NEOCON JEWS CLAMOR FOR GOY BLOOD

 

Continues …

Something Very Strange is Walking Sideway, on The Inside and The Outside

Reflections in a Petri Dish — Sept 19, 2017

Dog Poet Transmitting…..
{Before we get into whatever this is going to be, anyone who comes around here knows I deal in full disclosure. What that means is that when I screw up I put it out there. I have screwed up (but not in a good while) and I have sought to be as honest as possible in the process. In certain scenarios it was not I who screwed up and the followup involved a great deal of slander. Like everything else, that passes and I don’t think about it. Some things have happened recently that make no kind of sense. Some things are happening in the wider world too. I don’t know if they make sense or not. Perhaps they make sense to the people doing them and not to the people it is going to happen to and perhaps it is KARMA. I don’t know but we are going to talk about both of them. We’ll start with the wider world and then move on to the personal.}
When I saw the Eclipse phenomena… well, I didn’t see it. I shut myself up in a room and pulled the shades. When I saw the astrological map of the planetary alignments and the parallels between the planetary alignments during the French Revolution, it rang several bells; none of which I wanted to hear but I heard them anyway. I looked at what I knew of the world as it is presently trending. I see the attacks on free speech; the emergence of neo-liberal Communism, the programming taking place at universities, the self appointed thought police, the specter of coming mob rule, the breakdown in long enduring traditions, the gender bending madnesses and push to violate the minds of the very young and promote sex change operations in small children. There’s a lot to see and all of it bears a frightening resemblance to the precursor conditions before the French Revolution. At that time, decadence was rampant in the chateaus of the rich and titled. The poor were very poor and what we later saw at work in Communist China and Cambodia was operate in the mindset of the Jacobins and “J’accuse!”
President Trump has, since his election, been totally co-opted by the Zionist and Deep State Satanists. Today we saw this disturbing headline from the Zionist press. We saw the inclusion of Syria and Iran in the catamite presidents commentary. These are all ongoing talking points of the Zionist, dual national, neo-cons. They’re running the white house. It is foolish to imagine that the reptile cabal does not have video and audio confirmation of bad behavior on the part of anyone in a position of influence.
In the meantime, the weather is going berserk; first Houston, then Florida. Now more is coming and there is more behind that. There’s Hurricane Mathew and others and there are earthquakes that they can’t predict, rumbling under the Earth. One should keep in mind that there are socio-cultural hurricanes and earthquakes taking place at the same time. It’s getting very strange out there so… it stands to reason that it is getting very strange ‘in there’ as well. I am talking about in the minds and emotions of the people.
I have seen some very strange events take place lately. I’m not going to list them independently. I’ll ask you to take my word because going into real detail won’t be of a great deal of use since I don’t know what the reasons are for why these things have happened. I’m talking about dealing with legitimate business enterprises and having them behave in very strange ways, totally outside the expected way that any of us are used to. I had a camera sent to me with no buttons for its use. I had accessories that should have come with a guitar that never showed up and the way I was dealt with concerning it has been bizarre in the extreme. I want to add that these are only two out of easily a half a dozen events in the last couple of weeks. One or two events I can live with. Anomalies happen all the time. Wait a minute… they wouldn’t be anomalies then, would they?
Yesterday… a fellow that I have known for a few years had been sending me video links to a psychologist… psychiatrist I don’t know which. He also sent me a main reference page to this woman’s videos. I took one look at her face and I got the internal message that she was not for me. My relationship to phrenology runs much deeper than one might think because I don’t talk about it much but it influences how I read people. I need this system because it has protected me a great deal since I started employ it. The person who sent this to me was very insistent that I pay attention to what she had to say because it would answer all of the problems that I have to deal with concerning my childhood and the abuse that was the hallmark of it. As far as I know there are no perpetuating problems I am having to deal with because of my childhood. The ineffable explained it all to me and how it was arranged from the beginning to help shape me into the person I am today. Whether or not that is a good thing is up to you to decide. It is up to you to decide if I provide any kind of a service as a result of the forces that shaped me. Some may think so and some may not. Either way is fine with me.
I told him I wasn’t going to get anything from what this woman had to say. Then he said, “Wrong. Actually she has a lot more information about you and your childhood abuse than you’ll likely ever admit or allow yourself to know know, if you are capable of it to begin with. Unless you take the time to try, you wont learn anything but whatever it is you have already made up your mind on.” Now… I don’t know this fellow very well. I met him once for a few hours and he has been emailing me about his life details for a few years and asking me questions now and again. Mostly they have to do with my Kundalini experience because he believes he is having them. I don’t know one way or the other about that. My friend that I live with went and listened to this woman and then came to me and said, “You’re right. I mostly like everyone, as you know, but… I don’t like her.” This confirmed my original perception about this woman since my friend has proven to be very accurate in the time we have known each other.
This morning I went to my Facebook page and saw a public message from this lady (on my latest Smoking Mirrors post) that I know of peripherally. She has a webpage where she posts information about a mix of metaphysical and new age issues and ideas. She has linked to me on occasion. Her and I haven’t had much to do with each other. She offered to host my blogs when all that confusion went down a month or two ago and someone who works with her assisted me for a time. It was all hard to figure out and nothing came of it in the end. I must have spoken to her years ago about the Urantia Book. That’s all I can figure… or she just took exception to what I had to say about using it as a doorstop since it was a huge book and that was the only use I could think of to put it to. Apparently she is really into the book and she let me know that I shouldn’t be calling ‘the ineffable’, the ineffable, that instead, I should be using the term ‘indwelling Father’ and that I shouldn’t even use the term God either. There was nothing about the Urantia book in the post. I don’t remember mentioning the book in a very long time but… out of the blue she shows up and it is as if we were in some conversation that never happened- or I have completely backed out- and she was aggressive about it the same way this other fellow was about the video. Meanwhile… there have been several other events of similar kind and none of them make any sense at all.
In the examples given, on the one hand I just didn’t want to watch a video to fix childhood issues I don’t have and in the other I was being regaled about the Urantia Book, which I haven’t even thought about in years and… in the other cases, the same type of thing was taking place, having to do with things I didn’t even know about and have nothing to do with me and in every case the other person was insistent that I do something, watch something, listen to something and… when I refused in a polite manner, I heard about it. Now… none of this may seem strange to any of you but if you were in my position you would find it disturbing and alarming because of the similarity across the board with all of them. Presently, posters I have never seen before are showing up at the blogs and making reference to names that I refuse to use. I have no idea what that is about.
I’m talking about this because I have don’t know what is going on and why any of this has been happening and I am talking about real multiples and in every case, I either didn’t do what I was being told to do or… I had no idea of what was going on in the first place. Then I take a cursory look at what is happening in the world and what is being threatened to happen and… Whoa!!! My friends… some very weird things are going on. I’m comforted by not having played any part in bringing any of it about; in the world at large and in my own personal sphere. I’m telling you about this because usually strange things lead to stranger things and there’s no telling what’s up ahead… especially in the world at large. It looks like the neo-cons are getting ready to manifest bloodshed around the world. Lady Nature has brought out her orchestra and all of this seems to be filtering down into the personal realm.
There have been times in my life when I didn’t know what was going on but usually it had to do with something I might have initiated through not paying attention. I am a very different person than I was even a short time ago. Critical mass has been reached in my life and the ineffable has become my sole focus and concern. Whatever may have been an area of interest and concern to me is no more. I want to spend ALL of my waking moments seeking to practice the presence of God as often as I can remember to do so. Nothing else has any further value or importance to me.
I don’t know what else to say at the moment. The ineffable is the only important thing in my life and I intend to keep it that way. Hopefully everyone can adjust to this (grin) because it isn’t going to change.
End Transmission…….

 

Source

Parsons Green bomb suspect reported to anti-terror hotline weeks before attack

Introduction — Sept 20, 2017

The Parsons Green bombing has much in common with another terror incident that occurred in the UK recently.
Salman Abedia. Click to enlarge

Salman Abedia. Click to enlarge

Like Libyan-born Salman Abedi, the Manchester suicide bomber, the Parsons Green bombing was carried out by a refugee. The 18-year-old currently being held police in connection with Parsons Green originally came from Iraq, but was recently allowed into the UK as an “orphan”.
Perhaps more significantly the authorities already knew about his potential as a “radical”, just as they knew of Salman Abedi’s links with anti-Gaddafi groups in Libya.
Salman Abedi and his family had made frequent trips from their council home in Manchester to Libya, yet when they returned they were allowed back in without question.
According to some this was because Britain operated a virtual open “door policy” policy that allowed Libyan exiles and British-Libyan citizens to fight in the 2011 uprising that toppled Gaddafi. Even though some had previously been implicated in terrorism they were ushered through airport security without scrutiny.
This may also have been helped by the fact that the Manchester bomber’s father, Ramadan Abedi, had originally been recruited by British Intelligence in an effort to oust Gaddafi. So the suicide bomber was known to British intelligence before he wreaked havoc in Manchester.
Now it transpires that the Parsons Green bomber was also known to the security services. He had in fact been reported to an anti-terror hotline just days before he struck.
Salman Abedi's younger brother  Hashem (pictured)  had also reportedly been linked to ISIS. Click to enlarge

Salman Abedi’s younger brother Hashem (pictured) had also reportedly been linked to ISIS. Click to enlarge

Is it really a coincidence that the authorities knew about two potential terror threats beforehand but were unable to prevent either? Or did they know about them but allow them to go ahead anyway?
This is not some far-fetched conspiracy theory. There have been numerous instances where governments have used terrorism and even covertly promoted it for their own ends. This has been widely documented and is a matter of historical record: from Operation Gladio to the U.S. support for mujahideen fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan, using terror has often been a matter of undisclosed government policy in the West.
So it’s worth asking whether Western governments are once again using terrorism for the own ends? Only this time with the terror now being aimed directly at their own people.
If that was the case with the Parsons Green bombing then the perpetrators probably didn’t have a clue they were being used. In fact their ignorance on this matter would have been essential to the success of the whole operation.
Using ignorant patsies to incite fear and apprehension among the indigenous population. With anonymous third parties supplying explosives to the willing dupes who, ideally, had little knowledge of how to construct a real bomb.
Of course this would make it more likely that the bomb wouldn’t detonate properly, just like the one in Parsons Green didn’t.
If we are to successfully neutralise the threat of terror we first need to deal with those elements in the West — in the security services, the media, the judiciary and government — that are actively colluding with it. Ed.
Parsons Green bomber caught on CCTV on the morning of the blast. Click to enlarge

Parsons Green bomber caught on CCTV on the morning of the blast. Click to enlarge

Parsons Green bomb suspect reported to anti-terror hotline weeks before attack

Chris Pollard, Nick Parker, Pat Gysin, Tom Michael and staff writers — News.com.au Sept 19, 2017

OFFICIALS had been warned about the teen held over the London Tube bucket bomb, it emerged yesterday as new CCTV footage was revealed.

The increasingly radical views of the 18-year-old Iraqi orphan were said to have led to a tip-off to the anti-terror hotline, Prevent reports The Sun.

A neighbour of the teen’s foster parents said police made repeated visits — one as recently as two weeks ago

Last night a source confirmed to The Sun: “I understand he was flagged up to Prevent. There are bound to be questions over what they did.”

The new CCTV allegedly shows the suspect riding a bike around near the foster home in Sunbury-on-Thames, Surrey, in the days leading up to the bombing.

Images show a young man — wearing a distinctive red hat — moving around near the property from September 10-13.

Some of the pictures — recorded just two days before the botched bombing — show the figure holding a bag emblazoned with the British flag as he cycles along.

Another video was recorded by security cameras outside Italian restaurant Ecco La Vera on Vicarage Road, Sunbury, on the day of the attack.

The suspected bomber can be seen carrying a white Lidl bag similar to the one believed to have contained the explosive device as he casually walks to Sunbury Railway Station at around 7.04am on Friday.

 

Continues …

Yes, antifa is the moral equivalent of neo-Nazis

Marc A. Theissen — Washington Post Aug 30, 2017

Last weekend in Berkeley, Calif., a group of neo-communist antifa — “anti-fascist” — thugs attacked peaceful protesters at a “No to Marxism in America” rally, wielding sticks and pepper spray, and beating people with homemade shields that read (I kid you not) “No Hate.” The Post reports how one peaceful protester “was attacked by five black-clad antifa members, each windmilling kicks and punches into a man desperately trying to protect himself.” Members of the Berkeley College Republicans were then stalked by antifa goons who followed them to a gas station and demanded they “get the [expletive] out” of their car, warning, “We are real hungry for supremacists and there is more of us.”

The organizer of the anti-Marxism protest is not a white supremacist. Amber Cummings is a self-described “transsexual female who embraces diversity” and had announced on Facebook that “any racist groups like the KKK [and] Neo-Nazis . . . are not welcome.” The protest was needed, Cummings said, because “Berkeley is a ground zero for the Marxist Movement.”

As if to prove Cummings’s point, the antifa movement responded with jackboots and clubs — because their definition of “fascist” includes not just neo-Nazis but also anyone who opposes their totalitarian worldview.

And let’s be clear: Totalitarian is precisely what they are. Mark Bray, a Dartmouth lecturer who has defended antifa’s violent tactics, recently explained in The Post, “Its adherents are predominantly communists, socialists and anarchists” who believe that physical violence “is both ethically justifiable and strategically effective.” In other words, they are no different from neo-Nazis. Neo-Nazis are the violent advocates of a murderous ideology that killed 25 million people last century. Antifa members are the violent advocates of a murderous ideology that, according to “The Black Book of Communism,” killed between 85 million and 100 million people last century. Both practice violence and preach hate. They are morally indistinguishable. There is no difference between those who beat innocent people in the name of the ideology that gave us Hitler and Himmler and those who beat innocent people in the name of the ideology that gave us Stalin and Dzerzhinsky.

The United States defeated two murderous ideologies in the 20th century. So we should all be repulsed by the sight of our fellow Americans carrying the banners of either movement, whether they are waving the red flags of communism or black flags of Nazism. Yet we are not. Communism is not viewed as an evil comparable to Nazism today. As Alex Griswold recently pointed out, the New York Times has published no fewer than six opinion pieces this year defending communism, including essays praising Lenin as a conservationist, explaining why Stalinism inspired Americans and arguing that the Bolsheviks were romantics at heart and that women had better sex under communism. Can one imagine the Times running similar pieces about the Nazis?

My mother and grandfather fought the Nazis in Poland during World War II, and her family then endured the Stalinist terror that followed, when Nazi occupation was replaced by Soviet domination. So forgive me if I see little moral distinction between the swastika and the hammer and sickle. Both are evil, and their modern adherents need to be condemned — especially when they dare to commit acts of violence in our midst to advance their hateful visions.

Both the left and the right have a responsibility to police their own movements. In the 1960s, William F. Buckley excommunicated the John Birch Society, widely believed then to be anti-Semitic and a proponent of nutty conspiracy theories, from the respectable right, and today, conservatives have a responsibility to do the same with the white nationalists of the alt-right.

Those on the left have responsibilities as well — responsibilities few are meeting. On Monday I asked the office of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for her statement of condemnation. To her credit, Pelosi issued a strong statement Tuesday, declaring, “The violent actions of people calling themselves antifa in Berkeley this weekend deserve unequivocal condemnation, and the perpetrators should be arrested and prosecuted. In California, as across all of our great nation, we have deep reverence for the Constitutional right to peaceful dissent and free speech. Non-violence is fundamental to that right.”

Good for her. So why haven’t more leading Democrats done the same? After Charlottesville, the media rightly demanded that President Trump and all Republicans condemn the neo-Nazis and the KKK. So where are the calls for Democrats to condemn antifa — and the brutal public condemnation for those who fail to do so? If black-clad neo-Nazis had attacked peaceful protesters at a “No to Racism in America” march in Berkeley, politicians in Washington would be falling over themselves to express their disgust — and any who failed to do so would be vilified. But when neo-communists commit this kind of violence, they get a pass from the left.

That cannot be allowed to stand.

 .
Courtesy Peter Myers

After Charlottesville

Jimmie Moglia — The Saker Sept 19, 2017

In a previous related article, (http://thesaker.is/the-two-americas-at-charlottesville/) I said there were still some unclear issues about the events at Charlottesville, especially regarding the death of the 32-year old Heather Heyer.

What I further found and here report is telling, especially considering that on September 13, 2017, the US Congress sent a “resolution” to Trump, who signed it, “SJ Resolution 49,” which says,

“Condemning the violence and domestic terrorist attack…. in Charlottesville… recognizing the first responders who lost their lives monitoring the events, (helicopter crash), offering deepest condolences to families and friends of those individuals who were killed, and deepest sympathies and support for those individuals who were injured by the violence, expressing support for the C community, rejecting white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neonazis and other hate groups and urging the President & the president’s cabinet to use all available resources to address the threat posed by those groups.”

This was unanimously signed by everyone in the Congress – the same that unanimously approved the genocides in Gaza, because, in the lingo of the Israelis “we must mow the lawn every now and then.”

Note that in the “Resolution” the actual terrorists (“Black Lives Matter,” “Antifa”) transported to Charlottesville to literally attack the legally approved demonstrators, are not even mentioned.

More than a resolution it sounds like propaganda, and every propaganda reveals the nature of the people who create it.

As for the young woman who died when a car driven by a demonstrator crashed against the one in front, what I outline here is supported by actual videos and even by the words of her mother.

The official news channels, ever ready to submit sense to sound, did not report but did not deny these further related findings. Considering that the MSM construes opinions as facts and facts as opinions when they don’t agree with the master’s voice, its silence is almost an endorsement.

On the other hand Charlottesville did as much political and social damage as it could be expected from the organized melee. Now noisy turbulence and popular clamors are abated. The novelty that captivates the superficial and the thoughtless is no longer, nor is the vehemence that delights the disturbed and the discontented.

As we know, everything can be believed if often and adequately repeated, for words mold perception. The French philosopher Fontenelle, a late 1600 precursor of Voltaire, used to say that that if twenty philosophers shall resolutely deny that the presence of the sun makes the day, whole nations may adopt the opinion.

In the instance of Charlottesville, opinions not propagated by reason, but caught by contagion, have already been imprinted in the masses’ mind. No need for correction, when correction would unmask the imposture.

Heather Heyer did not die crushed between two vehicles. Rather, in the turmoil and confusion caused by the oncoming car, she fell with others on the side of it. The actual cause of her death was a heart attack. The following should be noted,

The pictures of the woman shown by the regime media after the incident, were taken when she was between 13 and 20 years old:

Heather Heyer when younger. Click to enlarge

Heather Heyer when younger. Click to enlarge

Heather Heyer weighed about 400 lb (photo b)

Heather Heyer photo b

Heather Heyer photo b

The medical personnel who rushed to the scene tried to resuscitate her and for a few seconds succeeded, but her heart did not hold. (photo c shows H. Heyer on the stretcher where she was placed after the heart attack)

Heather Heyer on a stretcher. Click to enlarge

Heather Heyer on a stretcher. Click to enlarge

The young man driving the incriminated car was attempting to escape from the assailants. Who, as you can see from this 10 sec video,

chase and attack the car with sticks and baseball bats, even crushing the windscreen. The driver attempts to drive away in reverse.

As I said, followers of TV gossip had an opportunity to observe more closely an important related character, namely the mother of Heather Heyer, Susan Bro – interviewed by a TV media-personality called Ellen DeGeneres.

Here is the mother’s statement.

“The very last message was on August the 3rd. We didn’t talk all the time ’cause we knew each other was there. But on August the 3rd at 3:55 p.m., she texted me at work and said, ‘What’s your social? What year were you born?’ I told her, and I said, ‘Why [do] you need to know?’ And she said, ‘Well, I’m filling out an insurance policy and I want to make you the beneficiary,’”
“And I said, ‘Well, okay, but don’t die. I’d rather have you than the money,’” she continued. “And she said, ‘Lolol I’ll try not to.’ That’s the last thing I said to her. So I’m glad I was able to tell her I love her, but I miss her dreadfully.”

That the event was a tragedy is undisputed. But it is impossible not to wonder why a young 32-year old woman would decide to buy a life insurance, just days before dying. Falling on the ground is rarely a cause of death and not something to cause a heart attack. The matter is doubly strange for, should the victim have disclosed to the insurers an existing heart condition, she would not probably have obtained the insurance. And if she did not, it would be presumably a form of fraud, which would enable the insurers to challenge or refuse the payment.

Among other violent episodes in Charlottesville, some readers may have heard of the man who used a home-made flame-thrower to attack a “white supremacist”:

Improvised flamethrower used in Charlottesville. Click to enlarge

Improvised flamethrower used in Charlottesville. Click to enlarge

Given the current political-judicial atmosphere, it is plausible to assume that if the flame-throwing man had been a white demonstrator, he would now be in jail, accused of a hate-crime and attempted murder or similar. In jail, instead, is one of the authorized demonstrators who, to intimidate and deter the flame-thrower, shot a bullet into the ground with his revolver. The charge? Discharging a firearm within 1000 feet from a school.

Yet, this is how “The New Yorker” describes the flamethrower. The piece is titled “An Image of Revolutionary Fire at Charlottesville,” and is penned by a “Doreen St. Félix”, defined somewhere else on the web as one of the best writers of the new age.

quote

Two men extend weapons: one is the Confederate flag, furled, hiding its retrograde design, and the other is an aerosol can, modified to eject fire. The figures stand in a classical configuration, on the diagonal, as if a Dutch master has placed them just so. The white supremacist, a little stout, is dressed in a sloppy kind of uniform; his mouth is puckered as he strains to threaten his adversary. He waves his flag strenuously, an incoherent blur. The mob behind him looks on, seemingly timid.

His opponent, a black man who was recently identified as the twenty-three-year-old Corey Long, is, by contrast, a figure of elegance. Long is shirtless; movement serves only to define his muscles. The line from his leg to the fire he sprays is unbroken. The bottom half of his face is obscured by a mask, but his pose telegraphs confidence: he seems almost relaxed. An old man hunches behind him, as if taking shelter. Compared to his foe, Long handles his instrument easily, and wittily—when that flag catches on fire, the supremacist will be carrying the sacrilege that he fears. The photo recalls the mysterious serenity of historical images of self-defense…

unquote

In other words, the flamethrower is a “figure of elegance, shirtless, movement serves only to define his muscles.” The attacked is “a little stout, dressed in a sloppy kind of uniform… “ This is detestable drivel. It suggests a whore selling everything to the highest bidder.

Let’s now return to the nation-wide campaign to deface and destroy monuments of national historic figures, and to the Congress’ “Resolution,” signed by Trump. Notice that the “Resolution” makes no mention of the ongoing defacement of monuments.

It is difficult to ignore, in the organized and well-staged riots, one more episode of ongoing attacks against the US population of European origin.

For the “revolution” of Charlottesville – so similar to other “color revolutions”, but in a domestic version – also helps indirectly to increase the fake “public-opinion” pressure on Congress to grant the famous “amnesty” to illegal aliens – a measure of which the Zionists are the most active and vociferous promoters. For it was the Zionist senator Jarvis in 1965 who sponsored and pushed through the measure that “opened the gates” to unlimited immigration from third world countries.

It is then clear to see the thread, the plot and the objectives. The Europeans are “supremacists” and “racists.” To oppose them it is necessary to increase the number of non-European immigrants, to fight the racist threat.

Not long ago, Patrick Buchanan, at one time a candidate for the presidency, said that, by applying the “family reunification clause,” an immigrant can succeed in importing up to 237 relatives.

By passing the “amnesty” measure, the time will be closer when the European ethnic component in the US will be a minority. Which is a stated objective of the plan by the Talmudist Coudeneuve-Kalergy in his book, “Praktischer Idealismus” – where he advocates a miscegenated universal negroid race, directed and managed by the best among the “chosen people.” For the “chosen people” are exempted and actually obliged not to mix with other races, a policy and practice openly applied in Israel and for all to see.

Complicating and actually facilitating the plot is a general condition that escapes immediate observation. Talmudists do not appear, externally, much different from Europeans. Therefore, by counting the Talmudists as “white,” it is true that the “whites” are in charge of America, or that whites are “supremacists.”

But, as we know, reality is different. And the mass media, along with Zionist-inspired or funded think-tanks rely on this confusion to instil ethnic hatred against Americans of European origin.

Even the sudden contempt for historical figures cannot be the fruit of popular inventiveness. In an environment where people at large cannot distinguish Austria from Australia (to quote Putin), history is even dimmer than geography, in the minds at large.

Somebody must have come up with the idea of hating (what are considered) national heroes and of destroying their monuments. Past records of similar phenomena give us a clue as to the probable source – a well-funded think-tank, via the variable weather of some academic mind, the flying vapors of incipient madness, which from time to time cloud reason, without completely eclipsing it.

We all know the limitations of historical figures – personally, for example, I nourish little sympathy for Columbus. But destruction of monuments will not change history – for if it were so, we should certainly dynamite the Pyramids or pull down the Coliseum in Rome, to name but two.

Therefore, the sudden hatred of statues, flags and monuments can logically be explained as the component of a war of sorts against Americans of European ethnicity.

As another example, watch to your disgust the following masterpiece, by a rapper called “xxxtentacion.” The rap opens (from 0m10sec to 0m52sec), with a bunch of black students killing their white teacher Then (from 2m10sec to 3m33sec). a black man, with the help of a black boy, hangs a white boy about 10-year old.

Incidentally, “xxxtentacion” recently spent several months in jail for hitting a pregnant woman and other various charges.

The “success” of “xxxtentacion” and his ilk are not spontaneous. There is an “invisible hand” that creates all this.

There is also one other extant and clear proof of a war against Europeans at large. Against the brave who dare to inform the people via alternative Internet channels, the Zionists are fighting a fierce battle. For it is important that the masses be unaware. To this end, the Zionists are doing what they can to block sources of alternative information.

Given the total Zionist control of the information industry, they can shut down sites, as the Saker reported recently, and even hamper or impede the transfer of voluntary contributions to Internet sites and stations they dislike – in clear violation of the “First Amendment” of the Constitution on freedom of speech.

Orwell could not have envisioned a situation more consonant to his “1984”

He who writes hears or reads about these things, sometimes wishes not to believe the evidence, because the evidence seems impossible to anyone of sound mind (assuming but not given that there is agreement on a minimum common denominator for “mental sanity.”)

To test myself that I am not imagining things, I find it instructive, at times, to consult sundry Israeli and/or Talmudic websites. I quote one here but there are similar others.

In the video, the rabbi compares a Jew to a Goy, “even a good-natured Goy” – he says. This honorable interpreter of the “book of God” makes two comparisons.

In the first example, he refers to a bucket that an unnamed individual uses to collect water from a river or a well. In the metaphor, the Jew is the water in the bucket, and the Goy the irrelevant drops spilled and lost while collecting and transporting the bucket.

The second example is even more interesting. This time we are in a market where a Jew goes to buy a kilogram (2.2 pounds) of pickling cucumbers (about 10, apparently). The grocer uses an old-fashioned scale that cannot be very accurate. Rather than one accurate kilogram, the scale will measure a few grams more or a few grams less. Those few grams of cucumbers not included in the valuation of the purchase correspond to the worth of a Goy, compared to the worth of a Jew, which corresponds to the actual kilogram.

Impossible, I say to myself. This is a pantomime staged by an Anti-Semite with time to spare who tries to be funny – an old fond paradox to make fools laugh in the alehouse. But then I find that the character in question, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi, maintains an excellent website,

www.divineinformation.com

where an interested internaut can listen, laugh or cry at this and other similar sermons by such a credible and instructive man of God.

But it would be bitter laughter. For, as we know, these people tightly control all key aspects of politics, entertainment, finance and education, and maybe even sports. It was just announced that the next 2018 world-renowned 101st “Giro d’Italia,” the Cycling Tour of Italy, will start….. in Israel (!), a racist, apartheid state, built on illegally occupied land. Which should tell us how far is the reach of the hand of Zion. It is an absolute first, the beginning of the Tour in a non-European country.

On the other side of the pond, the same lugubrious characters, Kagan, Wolfowitz, Nuland (famous for telling Europeans to f—k off) and several others – those who gifted the world with the destruction of Libya, Syria, Iraq, the permanent war in Afghanistan, the “color revolutions” of Georgia and Ukraine, not to talk about 9/11, are still there, in the White House, in front or behind the curtains.

The reader may meditate and perhaps set aside the “economic motives,” the “war for oil,” the “export of democracy,” and sundry other reasons peddled by the ruffian media to justify the wars, disasters and genocides of the last 20-30 years.

I would invite him to read – in Dostoyevsky’s “Diary of a Writer,”- as a classical example “super partes,” above the fray, the chapter “The Jewish Question.” I mean Dostoyevsky, the miner of the deep in the human soul, the prophet of equality among people, the giant of XIX century literature and of humanity at large.

Or he may read Solzhenitsyn on the same subject, in his two-volume book “Two Centuries Together.” Let the reader forget Charlottesville, or ignore all that was written and shown in this blog, and upon completing the suggested readings, let him reach his own conclusions.

JM

Source

After the Caliphate, Rojava

Thierry Meyssan — Voltairenet.org Sept 19, 2017

While the Syrian Arab Army, the Russian aviation and Hezbollah are preparing to finish off Daesh, the Pentagon is planning a new war against Syria, this time with Kurdish troops. Just as the mission of the Caliphate was to create a Sunnistan straddling Iraq and Syria, so the mission of « Rojava » is to create a Kurdistan straddling the two states, as the Pentagon has been publicly stating for the last four years.

This map was published by Robin Wright nine months before the offensive by Daesh into Iraq and Syria. According to this Pentagon researcher, it rectifies the map published in 2005 by Ralf Peters for the reshaping of the Greater Middle East.

This map was published by Robin Wright nine months before the offensive by Daesh into Iraq and Syria. According to this Pentagon researcher, it rectifies the map published in 2005 by Ralf Peters for the reshaping of the Greater Middle East.

According to US grand strategy, as defined by Admiral Cebrowski in 2001, and published in 2004 by his assistant Thomas Barnett, all of the Greater Middle East must be destroyed except for Israël, Jordan and Lebanon.

Consequently, the imminent victory against Daesh will change nothing of the Pentagon’s intentions.

President Trump is against the manipulation of the jihadists. He has stopped the financial and military support that his country was giving them, and has managed to convince Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to do the same. He has modified NATO policies in the matter. However, nothing yet hints as to whether or not he will also oppose the Pentagon’s grand strategy. As far as the US Interior is concerned, the whole of Congress is in league against him, and he has no possibility of preventing a procedure for destitution other than negotiating with the Democratic Party.

Donald Trump has composed his administration of ex-senior civil servants from the Obama administration, a number of opportunistic politicians, many improvised representatives, and very very few trustworthy personalities.

His special representative against Daesh, Brett McGurk, is an ex-collaborator of President Obama and is supposed to serve Trump’s new policy. On 18 August, he organised a meeting with the tribal leaders to « fight Daesh ». However, the photographs he published attest to the fact that, on the contrary, several of Daesh’s leaders also participated in the meeting.

In the same vein, helicopters of the US Special Forces exfiltrated two European leaders of Daesh and their families from the outskirts of Deiz ez-Zor, before they could be taken prisoner by the Syrian Arab Army on 26 August. Two days later, they also exfiltrated about twenty more Daesh officers.

Everything looks as though the Pentagon were storing away its jihadist structure and conserving it for other operations elsewhere. Simultaneously, it is preparing a new episode against Syria with a new army, which, this time, will be composed around Kurdish forces.

This war, like the war against the Caliphate, was announced four years ago in the New York Times, by Robin Wright, a researcher at the US Institute of Peace (equivalent to the NED for the Pentagon). It also planned to divide the Yemen into two states, potentially shared between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi – and finally, last but not least, to dismember Saudi Arabia.

Meanwhile, the « Rojava » project corresponds to Israëli strategy, which, since the end of the 1990’s and the development of missiles, is no longer concentrated on controlling its border regions (the Sinaï, the Golan and South Lebanon), but on taking its neighbours from behind (hence the creation of South Sudan and eventually, Greater Kurdistan).

The recruiting drive for European soldiers for the « Rojava » project has only just begun. A priori, it could assemble as many combatants as there were for the jihad, insofar as the members of the anarchist groups which provide manpower are as numerous in Europe as common law prisoners.

Indeed, the jihadist network began in French prisons before becoming a generalised « crusade ». It is probable that the recruitment within the anarchist movement will also spread as the conflict goes on. Washington, London, Paris and Berlin, who organised this recruitment, planned in the long term. I use the word « crusade » deliberately, because these wars in the Middle Ages, like the one we have just experienced, were, in fact, European imperialist operations against the people of the Greater Middle East. It is just as grotesque to claim that there is a link between the message of Christ and the crusades as to claim a link between the Prophet and jihadism. In both cases, the commanders were « Westerners » [1], and these conflicts exclusively served Western imperialism. The successive crusades bled across two centuries, and the majority of Christians in the Levant fought alongside their Muslim compatriots against the invaders.

Not long ago, the French Minister for Foreign Affairs, Laurent Fabius, publicly declared that President Assad « did not deserve to be on Earth », and confirmed that the jihadists were doing a « good job ». Many young people answered his call by joining Al-Nusra (Al-Qaïda), then Daesh. Today, the French ex-Minister for Foreign Affairs, Bernard Kouchner, publicly announced that France would support the creation of the state which would include Iraqi Kurdistan and the corridor to the Mediterranean via Syria. A few young Europeans have already answered this call, and many others will follow.

Today, as in 2011-12, the Western Press has taken the side of this new anti-Syrian army, supported by their governments. It will never question the treachery of Abdullah Öcalan, who renounced Marxist-Leninism for anarchy. It will repeat that Kurdistan has already been recognised by the Sèvres Conference, in 1920, but it will avoid looking at the documents which specify its boundaries. It will believe it to be legitimate in Iraq and Syria, although it is currently situated in Turkey. It will ignore the fact that the frontiers, in fact, correspond to nothing other than the plans developed by the Pentagon.

The referendum for the independence of the Iraqi region of Kurdistan and the territories annexed with the help of Daesh will launch the beginning of this operation, on 25 September. As in 2014, it will be intended to simultaneously destroy Iraq and Syria, this time without creating a « Sunnistan » from Rakka to Mossul, but a « Kurdistan », on a territory linking Erbil and Kirkuk to the Mediterranean.

Thierry Meyssan

Translation
Pete Kimberley

Source
Al-Watan (Syria)

Source

Israel Shoots Down Iranian-made Hezbollah Drone Over Syria Border

Amos Harel, Noa Shpigel, Jack Khoury — Haaretz Sept 19, 2017

Patriot anti missile battery near Haifa. Click to enlarge

Patriot anti missile battery near Haifa. Click to enlarge

The Israel Defense Forces shot down an Iranian-made drone operated by Hezbollah on Tuesday afternoon after the drone entered the demilitarized zone along the border between Israel and Syria on the Golan Heights. The Israel Air Force’s aerial defense command fired a Patriot missile and destroyed the drone.

The interception of the drone took place just hours before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to speak to the United Nations General Assembly in New York. A large part of his speech is expected to be devoted to Israeli claims concerning Iranian military involvement in Syria.

The remotely piloted vehicle, intended for intelligence gathering missions, was identified as it took off from Damascus International Airport. It then flew to the southwest toward Israel. When the Air Force’s air defense control center identified the drone entering the demilitarized zone on the Golan, the IDF decided to shoot it down. Fighter jets were scrambled to the area but did not fire at the drone.

The drone was intercepted by a Patriot missile fired by an anti-aircraft battery located in the Galilee. The drone fell inside Syrian territory in a region controlled by the Assad regime near the city of Quneitra.

 

Source

The Best Speech Yet From Any U.S. President

David Swanson — Washington’s Blog Sept 18, 2017

In planning an upcoming conference aimed at challenging the institution of war, to be held at American University September 22-24, I can’t help but be drawn to the speech a U.S. president gave at American University a little more than 50 years ago. Whether or not you agree with me that this is the best speech ever given by a U.S. president, there should be little dispute that it is the speech most out of step with what anyone will say on Capitol Hill or in the White House today. Here’s a video of the best portion of the speech:

President John F. Kennedy was speaking at a time when, like now, Russia and the United States had enough nuclear weapons ready to fire at each other on a moment’s notice to destroy the earth for human life many times over. At that time, however, in 1963, there were only three nations, not the current nine, with nuclear weapons, and many fewer than now with nuclear energy. NATO was far removed from Russia’s borders. The United States had not just facilitated a coup in Ukraine. The United States wasn’t organizing military exercises in Poland or placing missiles in Poland and Romania. Nor was it manufacturing smaller nukes that it described as “more usable.” Nor was it threating to use them on North Korea. The work of managing U.S. nuclear weapons was then deemed prestigious in the U.S. military, not the dumping ground for drunks and misfits that it has become. Hostility between Russia and the United States was high in 1963, but the problem was widely known about in the United States, in contrast to the current vast ignorance. Some voices of sanity and restraint were permitted in the U.S. media and even in the White House. Kennedy was using peace activist Norman Cousins as a messenger to Nikita Khrushchev, whom he never described, as Hillary Clinton has described Vladimir Putin, as “Hitler.” Even the U.S. and Soviet militaries were communicating with each other. Not anymore.

Kennedy framed his speech as a remedy for ignorance, specifically the ignorant view that war is inevitable. This is the opposite of what President Barack Obama said in Hiroshima last year and earlier in Prague and Oslo, and what Lindsey Graham says about war on North Korea.

Kennedy called peace “the most important topic on earth.” He renounced the idea of a “Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war,” precisely what both big political parties now and most speeches on war by most past U.S. presidents ever have favored. Kennedy went so far as to profess to care about 100% rather than 4% of humanity:

“… not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women–not merely peace in our time but peace for all time.”

Kennedy explained war and militarism and deterrence as nonsensical:

“Total war makes no sense in an age when great powers can maintain large and relatively invulnerable nuclear forces and refuse to surrender without resort to those forces. It makes no sense in an age when a single nuclear weapon contains almost ten times the explosive force delivered by all the allied air forces in the Second World War. It makes no sense in an age when the deadly poisons produced by a nuclear exchange would be carried by wind and water and soil and seed to the far corners of the globe and to generations yet unborn.”

Kennedy went after the money. Military spending is now over half of federal discretionary spending, and Trump wants to push it up toward 60%.

“Today,” said Kennedy in 1963,

“the expenditure of billions of dollars every year on weapons acquired for the purpose of making sure we never need to use them is essential to keeping the peace. But surely the acquisition of such idle stockpiles–which can only destroy and never create–is not the only, much less the most efficient, means of assuring peace.”

In 2017 even beauty queens have shifted to advocating war rather than “world peace.” But in 1963 Kennedy spoke of peace as the serious business of government:

“I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of rational men. I realize that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as the pursuit of war–and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on deaf ears. But we have no more urgent task. Some say that it is useless to speak of world peace or world law or world disarmament–and that it will be useless until the leaders of the Soviet Union adopt a more enlightened attitude. I hope they do. I believe we can help them do it. But I also believe that we must reexamine our own attitude–as individuals and as a Nation–for our attitude is as essential as theirs. And every graduate of this school, every thoughtful citizen who despairs of war and wishes to bring peace, should begin by looking inward–by examining his own attitude toward the possibilities of peace, toward the Soviet Union, toward the course of the cold war and toward freedom and peace here at home.”

Can you imagine any approved speaker on corporate media or Capitol Hill suggesting that in U.S. relations toward Russia a major part of the problem might be U.S. attitudes?

Peace, Kennedy explained in a manner unheard of today, is perfectly possible:

“First: Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself. Too many of us think it is impossible. Too many think it unreal. But that is a dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable–that mankind is doomed–that we are gripped by forces we cannot control. We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade–therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man’s reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable–and we believe they can do it again. I am not referring to the absolute, infinite concept of peace and goodwill of which some fantasies and fanatics dream. I do not deny the value of hopes and dreams but we merely invite discouragement and incredulity by making that our only and immediate goal. Let us focus instead on a more practical, more attainable peace– based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual evolution in human institutions–on a series of concrete actions and effective agreements which are in the interest of all concerned. There is no single, simple key to this peace–no grand or magic formula to be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static, changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a process–a way of solving problems.”

Kennedy debunked some of the usual straw men:

“With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor–it requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations between nations and neighbors. So let us persevere. Peace need not be impracticable, and war need not be inevitable. By defining our goal more clearly, by making it seem more manageable and less remote, we can help all peoples to see it, to draw hope from it, and to move irresistibly toward it.”

Kennedy then laments what he considers, or claims to consider, baseless Soviet paranoia regarding U.S. imperialism, Soviet criticism not unlike his own more private criticism of the CIA. But he follows this by flipping it around on the U.S. public:

“Yet it is sad to read these Soviet statements–to realize the extent of the gulf between us. But it is also a warning–a warning to the American people not to fall into the same trap as the Soviets, not to see only a distorted and desperate view of the other side, not to see conflict as inevitable, accommodation as impossible, and communication as nothing more than an exchange of threats. No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find communism profoundly repugnant as a negation of personal freedom and dignity. But we can still hail the Russian people for their many achievements–in science and space, in economic and industrial growth, in culture and in acts of courage. Among the many traits the peoples of our two countries have in common, none is stronger than our mutual abhorrence of war. Almost unique among the major world powers, we have never been at war with each other. And no nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union suffered in the course of the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and farms were burned or sacked. A third of the nation’s territory, including nearly two-thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland–a loss equivalent to the devastation of this country east of Chicago.”

Imagine today trying to get Americans to see a designated enemy’s point of view and ever being invited back on CNN or MSNBC afterwards. Imagine hinting at who actually did the vast majority of winning World War II or why Russia might have good reason to fear aggression from its west!

Kennedy returned to the nonsensical nature of the cold war, then and now:

Today should total war ever break out again–no matter how–our two countries would become the primary targets. It is an ironic but accurate fact that the two strongest powers are the two in the most danger of devastation. All we have built, all we have worked for, would be destroyed in the first 24 hours. And even in the cold war, which brings burdens and dangers to so many nations, including this Nation’s closest allies–our two countries bear the heaviest burdens. For we are both devoting massive sums of money to weapons that could be better devoted to combating ignorance, poverty, and disease. We are both caught up in a vicious and dangerous cycle in which suspicion on one side breeds suspicion on the other, and new weapons beget counterweapons. In short, both the United States and its allies, and the Soviet Union and its allies, have a mutually deep interest in a just and genuine peace and in halting the arms race. Agreements to this end are in the interests of the Soviet Union as well as ours–and even the most hostile nations can be relied upon to accept and keep those treaty obligations, and only those treaty obligations, which are in their own interest.”

Kennedy then urges, outrageously by the standards of some, that the United States tolerate other nations pursuing their own visions:

“So, let us not be blind to our differences–but let us also direct attention to our common interests and to the means by which those differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s future. And we are all mortal.”

Kennedy reframes the cold war, rather than the Russians, as the enemy:

“Let us reexamine our attitude toward the cold war, remembering that we are not engaged in a debate, seeking to pile up debating points. We are not here distributing blame or pointing the finger of judgment. We must deal with the world as it is, and not as it might have been had the history of the last 18 years been different. We must, therefore, persevere in the search for peace in the hope that constructive changes within the Communist bloc might bring within reach solutions which now seem beyond us. We must conduct our affairs in such a way that it becomes in the Communists’ interest to agree on a genuine peace. Above all, while defending our own vital interests, nuclear powers must avert those confrontations which bring an adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war. To adopt that kind of course in the nuclear age would be evidence only of the bankruptcy of our policy–or of a collective death-wish for the world.”

By Kennedy’s definition, the U.S. government is pursuing a death-wish for the world, just as by Martin Luther King’s definition four years later, the U.S. government is now “spiritually dead.” Which is not to say that nothing came of Kennedy’s speech and the work that followed it in the five months before he was murdered by U.S. militarists. Kennedy proposed in the speech the creation of a hotline between the two governments, which was created. He proposed a ban on nuclear weapons testing and announced the unilateral U.S. cessation of nuclear testing in the atmosphere. This led to a treaty banning nuclear testing except underground. And that led, as Kennedy intended, to greater cooperation and larger disarmament treaties.

This speech also led by degrees difficult to measure to greater U.S. resistance to launching new wars. May it serve to inspire a movement to bring the abolition of war to reality.

Speakers this coming weekend at American University will include: Medea Benjamin, Nadine Bloch, Max Blumenthal, Natalia Cardona, Terry Crawford-Browne, Alice Day, Lincoln Day, Tim DeChristopher, Dale Dewar, Thomas Drake, Pat Elder, Dan Ellsberg, Bruce Gagnon, Kathy Gannett, Will Griffin, Seymour Hersh, Tony Jenkins, Larry Johnson, Kathy Kelly, Jonathan King, Lindsay Koshgarian, James Marc Leas, Annie Machon, Ray McGovern, Rev Lukata Mjumbe, Bill Moyer, Elizabeth Murray, Emanuel Pastreich, Anthony Rogers-Wright, Alice Slater, Gar Smith, Edward Snowden (by video), Susi Snyder, Mike Stagg, Jill Stein, David Swanson, Robin Taubenfeld, Brian Terrell, Brian Trautman, Richard Tucker, Donnal Walter, Larry Wilkerson, Ann Wright, Emily Wurth, Kevin Zeese. Read speakers’ bios

 

Source

25 Photos Rothschild Illuminati Party 1972

Perfect Life — March 14, 2017

Illuminati Ritual & Occult Worship on Display at Rothschild Masquerade

Also see: SPIRIT COOKING | Marina Abramovic Cannibal Ritual | DISTURBING

10 Countries Most Afflicted By Modern Slavery

TDC — Aug 2017

Unshakable Assurance; one of The Greatest Gifts Anyone Can Possess

Smoking Mirrors — Sept 18, 2017

Dog Poet Transmitting…….
I had told myself I would not return to the dis-United States. My first efforts at avoiding that were a disaster resulting in a broken hip and a loss of most of my revenue, stashed at odd moments in anticipation of what I had been told was coming and then I was shown you can’t rely on any plans you may have made yourself; as has been the case through my life… and from what I understand, the lives of many of you as well.
Then I thought, perhaps Hawaii, which lured at me like a siren’s song backed by a Brazilian jazz trio; the promise of old friendships and creative collaborations That ended badly as well and… for some reason, thefts… this time stripped me of nearly everything I had left. Then the ineffable stepped in and said, “all of these conditions are now past and you will not suffer them again. A new chapter is begun.” So it came to pass and has continued to this point. What’s the message in all of this? The message is what I should have learned a long time ago and it was what I had been being told for several years already, “Rely on me.” IF a person who is told this… or IF there is a person who KNOWS this then… one’s concerns cease the moment this has been sincerely set in motion. If a person hears this and does not advantage themselves of it, then circumstances will be initiated to bring that person into a fuller awareness of the inevitability of it taking place and… those circumstances can be onerous, depending on how hard headed one is… or whatever the reasons may be. I speak from direct experience in this regard.
It is only later… unfortunately… when we realize that we were being guided and that we had strayed. Oh… it could have been with the best of intentions and it could have been free of any selfish intent but… it was not what would have happened if we had left it in the care of the one who is at the beginning and end of everything. I was once told… and not that long ago… “do not concern yourself with good and evil anymore. These are arbitrary at best and exist at the whim of those setting the general parameters for the public cooperation in the fulfilling of their agenda. The real nature and essence of good and evil are only known to the ineffable and for those who reside beneath the shelter of his protection they are of no concern.”
You are going to find at these blogs that they will be increasingly more and more about the divine and how he has chosen to inform the writer and what he has chosen to inform him of, within the limitations of what the writer is able to understand. When commentary about the world and its doings appear in these blogs, it will be only to illustrate them through the ever adjusting lens of perception, concerning what the ineffable has chosen to reveal to the writer. We can make no claim to being correct about anything. We just do the best we can and if you have come this far with us then you trust us to some degree. I recommend that you do not trust us or anyone, completely. If you are human, the capacity for error is always present. This is why the ancient wise have always admonished us to test the integrity of everything we choose to believe. Accept nothing without inquiry. You are a fool if you do.
I encourage the readers to seek for the ineffable within, with an intensity greater than their passion for, or curiosity about, anything else. Perhaps you are aware of the reason for this, perhaps not. We will seek to clear that up now; anything you seek… anything you wish for… anything you desire and so much that there is, which you are, as yet, unaware of, are in the possession of the ineffable AND none of them can be appreciated or enjoyed without the consent of the ineffable. Lacking that… it would be better that you had never acquired any of it at all. Depending on how badly you wanted it, that is how great the disappointment will be.
Not only are these statements true about the ineffable but it is important to note that the ineffable is intimately aware of you in a way greater than you are or may ever be. Because of this, the ineffable knows what is best for you, personally (as opposed to what the case may be for anyone else… and it is different in every case), so… why would anyone, so informed, take any other action except to place their life and destiny and fate in the hands of the ineffable, if it is true that the ineffable knows all (and he does) and has limitless power (and he does) and means well on our behalf (which he does) and can and will act in our interest to the degree that we place our interests in the competent hands of the ineffable? And… this is true. This is true.
One would have to be insane or deluded (and most of us are) to do anything other than to commit ourselves to the far greater wisdom and intelligence of the ineffable on our behalf. If one were motivated to read the statements made by Jesus Christ as an avatar, Lord Krishna as the Supreme Personality of God, of any mystic or poet from Lao Tzu to Rumi, or any philosopher from Soren Kierkegaard to Ralph Waldo Emerson and so many from the ancient times, they all, in one fashion or another, speak to the greatness of the ineffable and the wisdom of surrender to the ineffable.
Speaking only for myself, I will state unequivocally that among those just named are some number of men who were and perhaps always will be wiser than I. I have discovered the truth of this; the greatness of the ineffable and the wisdom of surrender to the ineffable. Imagine the more extreme clarity of these other minds in respect of the ineffable. Since I have found to be true what all of them proclaimed to be true… well, I also consider ‘these truths to be self evident’ depending on what your ‘self’ is so… there’s no hesitation on my part, not now. I wonder why there ever was? There are forces loose in this world and… in us, should they find access and they do find access. It is all a part of ‘innocence lost’. This, it seems, we could not evade but… innocence regained… regenerated innocence, then becomes the goal of one’s existence, unless it is not and sadly, far too often these days, it is not.
Did I discover something earthshaking and new? NO… I did not, except as regards myself. Otherwise, I have simply had what I already knew in the way that I knew it, made clear to me in a way it had not been previously. I have also had the affirmations of all those great minds brought to my attention in a unique and powerful way. How could I have been so stupid and confused? This is what I ask myself. How is it that I persisted in traveling on a course with no fixed destination, when the greatest architect of all had offered to chart my course? There are forces loose in the world around us and within us, when they have access and that accounts for all that we are when we are not ourselves. Herein is the problem with the world we live in and those who live in the world. They are not themselves, although the world is exactly what it is; the perpetuating mask that obscures the light of the ineffable and that is why we must seek it’s shining within. It is not in the world. It is not in some deep cavern, at the bottom of the sea, or anywhere else but within you and it is hidden within, as well as if it were hidden somewhere in the world and we did not know where it was.
The light within has a homing device that begins to operate the moment our attention is turned toward the discovery of it. There is a way that is certain and direct but… we are neither certain, nor direct, except in very special cases and so we are led… in part by the compassionate heart of the ineffable and in part via our own fumbling presumptions on where it may lie and what we have told ourselves it is composed of. In both cases we are destined to be proven wrong and the sooner we make ourselves aware of that or allow ourselves to be made aware of it, the sooner we find ourselves on the direct and certain way, while becoming one of those special cases.
Our minds are the playground of a monkey and our desires are the hungers of a dog. Neither the monkey nor the dog are capable of comprehending what needs to be understood. The dog is capable of absolute loyalty and it is here where the dog can prove fortunate by having the right master. The monkey, were it capable of becoming still, would no longer be a monkey.
I hope this departure from what you might usually expect at Smoking Mirrors has not proven to be a disappointment. I look forward with the keenest hope that the practice of the presence of the ineffable and the love of the ineffable will consume your heart and mind and grant you that unshakable assurance which is one of the most priceless possessions anyone can acquire.
End Transmission…….

 

Source

Austria Refuses To Take More Migrants Under EU Redistribution Scheme

Chris Tomlinson — Breibart London Sept 18, 2017

Austria-border-640x480

Austrian Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka has rejected efforts by the European Union to make Austria take in more migrants under the redistribution agreement saying Austria has “enough to do.”

Sobotka justified his stance before a meeting with EU officials in Brussels, saying that Austria had been one of the countries particularly burdened by a high number of migrants since 2015. Despite his reluctance for Austria to take in more, the minister did express his support for the recent European Court of Justice ruling which would force Hungary and Slovakia to take in migrants, Kronen Zeitung reports.

Sobotka’s statement comes just after EU Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos had promised the relocation of some 40,000 migrants from Greece and Italy.

On the ECJ migrant ruling against Hungary and Slovakia Sobotka said, “European court judgments must be respected, and as a minister of the interior, one must but be guided by the rule of law.”

The Hungarian government has vowed to keep up its refusal of taking in redistributed migrants despite the ruling.

In response to the ruling Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs wrote, “there is no European legal basis for compulsory population resettlement on the continent, and there is a very good reason for that. The last time we saw that was during some of the darkest years of the former century.”

The move by Sobotka might also be related to the upcoming Austrian election set to take place on October 15th. Sobotka’s party the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), are currently leading in the polls ahead of the anti-mass migration Freedom Party (FPÖ) who have been consistently tough on mass migration and radical Islam.

ÖVP leader Sebastian Kurz, who currently serves as Austrian Foreign Minister, has come more into line with FPÖ policies, even passing a banning of the full face Islamic veil earlier this year. The FPÖ under leader Heinz-Christian Strache has promised to go even further if elected and said his party will ban Islamism and look to deport radical extremists.

 

Source

Israel and US open first American military base in Israel

Yaniv Zohar — Associated Press Sept 18, 2017

AP Photo

Israeli Defense Forces Brig. Gen. Zvika Haimovich, right, and U.S. Maj. Gen. John L. Gronski sign an agreement during a ceremony at the Bislach Air Base, near Mitzpe Ramon, Monday, Sept. 18, 2017. Israel and the United States announced plans Monday to open the first American air base in the Jewish state — a facility that will aim to bolster Israel’s aerial defenses. (AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov)

Israel and the U.S. inaugurated the first American military base on Israeli soil on Monday, which will serve dozens of soldiers operating a missile defense system.

The move comes at a time of growing Israeli concerns about archenemy Iran’s development of long-range missiles. Together with the U.S., Israel has developed a multilayered system of defenses against everything from long-range guided missile attacks from Iran to crude rockets fired from Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.

The base’s opening is largely symbolic and isn’t expected to bring operational changes. But the Israeli military says that along with other measures, it sends a message of readiness to Israel’s enemies.

“It’s a message that says Israel is better prepared. It’s a message that says Israel is improving the response to threats,” said Brig. Gen. Zvika Haimovich, the commander of Israel’s aerial defense.

The base is located within an existing Israeli air force base and will operate under Israeli military directives.

Israeli and U.S. military officials cut a ribbon at the base Monday, where the American and Israeli flags flew side by side and soldiers from both countries commingled.

Israel’s multi-tier missile defense system includes the Arrow, designed to intercept long-range ballistic missiles in the stratosphere with an eye on Iran, and Iron Dome, which defends against short-range rockets from the Gaza Strip. David’s Sling is meant to counter the type of medium-range missiles possessed by Iranian-backed Hezbollah militants.

Israel considers Iran to be its greatest threat, citing the country’s nuclear ambitions, its development of long-term missiles, hostile anti-Israel rhetoric and support for anti-Israel militant groups. Israel has grown increasingly concerned about Iran’s involvement in the civil war in neighboring Syria, where its troops are supporting President Bashar Assad.

Israel is worried that Iran and its proxy Hezbollah will establish a long-term presence in Syria near the Israeli border.

Source

Mohammed Ali’s Defence of Racial Identity

henrymakow.com — Sept 18, 2017

Many goyim have drunk the Cabalist kool-aid and are accomplices in their own destruction. They think that preserving their racial heritage is “white supremacy” and “hateful.” Here is Mohammed Ali’s eloquent rejection in 1971 of interracial marriage: 
(See my comments below)
Interviewer – That’s because, that’s societies fault, we got to educate people about it.
M.A. – Life is too short for me to be catching hell for something like that, I’d rather be with my own, and have a beautiful daughter, beautiful wife, both look like me and we are all happy and I don’t have no trouble. I ain’t that in love with no women to go through all that hell, there’s no one woman that good. You understand?
Interviewer – I understand, I do understand, I think it’s sad …..
M.A. – (Interrupting) It ain’t sad because I want my child to look like me, every intelligent person wants their child to look like them, I’m sad because I want to blot out my race and lose my identity? Chinese love Chinese they love the little slanty eye, pretty brown skin babies. Pakistani love their culture, Jewish people love their culture, a lot of catholic wanna be with Catholics and want the religion to stay the same… who would want to spot up yourself and kill your race? You’re a hater of your people if you don’t want to stay who you are. You ashamed of what god made you? You think he made a mistake when he made you?
Interviewer – I think that’s a philosophy of despair, I really do
M.A. – Philosophy of despair? Here let me tell you, listen. No woman on this earth, not even a black woman in Muslim countries can please me and cook for me and socialize with me like my American black woman, no woman, and last is a white woman… can really identify with me and my feelings, and the way I act, and the way I talk…. it’s just nature, you can do what you want, but it’s nature to want to be with your own, I want to be with my own.
Incidentally, at the time when this interview was carried out (1971), about 75% of Americans would have agreed with him, including 40% of US Blacks.

 

Continues …

America’s slow-motion military coup

Stephen Kinzer — Boston Globe Sept 16, 2017

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and White House chief of staff John Kelly watched a presidential appearance alongside Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Vice President Mike Pence in August. Click to enlarge

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and White House chief of staff John Kelly watched a presidential appearance alongside Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Vice President Mike Pence in August. Click to enlarge

 In a democracy, no one should be comforted to hear that generals have imposed discipline on an elected head of state. That was never supposed to happen in the United States. Now it has.

Among the most enduring political images of the 20th century was the military junta. It was a group of grim-faced officers — usually three — who rose to control a state. The junta would tolerate civilian institutions that agreed to remain subservient, but in the end enforced its own will. As recently as a few decades ago, military juntas ruled important countries including Chile, Argentina, Turkey, and Greece.

These days the junta system is making a comeback in, of all places, Washington. Ultimate power to shape American foreign and security policy has fallen into the hands of three military men: General James Mattis, the secretary of defense; General John Kelly, President Trump’s chief of staff; and General H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser. They do not put on their ribbons to review military parades or dispatch death squads to kill opponents, as members of old-style juntas did. Yet their emergence reflects a new stage in the erosion of our political norms and the militarization of our foreign policy. Another veil is dropping.

Given the president’s ignorance of world affairs, the emergence of a military junta in Washington may seem like welcome relief. After all, its three members are mature adults with global experience — unlike Trump and some of the wacky political operatives who surrounded him when he moved into the White House. Already they have exerted a stabilizing influence. Mattis refuses to join the rush to bomb North Korea, Kelly has imposed a measure of order on the White House staff, and McMaster pointedly distanced himself from Trump’s praise for white nationalists after the violence in Charlottesville.

Being ruled by generals seems preferable to the alternative. It isn’t.

Military officers, like all of us, are products of their background and environment. The three members of Trump’s junta have 119 years of uniformed service between them. They naturally see the world from a military perspective and conceive military solutions to its problems. That leads toward a distorted set of national priorities, with military “needs” always rated more important than domestic ones.

Trump has made clear that when he must make foreign policy choices, he will defer to “my generals.” Mattis, the new junta’s strongman, is the former head of Central Command, which directs American wars in the Middle East and Central Asia. Kelly is also an Iraq veteran. McMaster has commanded troops in Iraq and Afghanistan almost without interruption since he led a tank company in the 1991 Gulf War.

Military commanders are trained to fight wars, not to decide whether fighting makes strategic sense. They may be able to tell Trump how many troops are necessary to sustain our present mission in Afghanistan, for example, but they are not trained either to ask or answer the larger question of whether the mission serves America’s long-term interest. That is properly the job of diplomats. Unlike soldiers, whose job is to kill people and break things, diplomats are trained to negotiate, defuse conflicts, coolly assess national interest and design policies to advance it. Notwithstanding Mattis’s relative restraint on North Korea, all three members of Trump’s junta promote the confrontational approach that has brought protracted war in Afghanistan, Iraq and beyond, while fueling tension in Europe and East Asia.

Our new junta is different from classic ones like, for example, the “National Council for Peace and Order” that now rules Thailand. First, our junta’s interest is only international relations, not domestic policy. Second, it did not seize power in a coup but derives its authority from the favor of an elected president. Third and most important, its main goal is not to impose a new order but to enforce an old one.

Last month, President Trump faced a crucial decision about the future of America’s war in Afghanistan. This was a potential turning point. Four years ago Trump tweeted, “Let’s get out of Afghanistan.” If he had followed that impulse and announced that he was bringing American troops home, the political and military elite in Washington would have been stunned. But junta members swung into action. They persuaded Trump to announce that instead of withdrawing, he would do the opposite: reject “rapid exit” from Afghanistan, increase troop strength, and continue “killing terrorists.”

It is no great surprise that Trump has been drawn into the foreign policy mainstream; the same happened to President Obama early in his presidency. More ominous is that Trump has turned much of his power over to generals. Worst of all, many Americans find this reassuring. They are so disgusted by the corruption and shortsightedness of our political class that they turn to soldiers as an alternative. It is a dangerous temptation.

Stephen Kinzer is a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University

 

Source

Six Case Studies That Point To Massive Pedophilia Rings At The Highest Levels Of Power

American Vagabond — Nov 11, 2016

Washington times headline. Click to enlarge

With all the speculation surrounding the Clintons, and the allegations that they are intimately tied to a massive pedophilia ring interconnected with occult practicesThe Last American Vagabond wanted to present the following case studies to show that the idea of a massive pedophilia ring at the highest levels of power is very real and needs to be addressed. This is not a joke and something people should not take lightly.

To present the research, we would like to showcase a brilliant write-up by a fellow redditor explaining six cases that point to this being more than mere separate incidents or isolated events(Thank you for your incredible courage to do the research and present it for all to see. Your work and time is much appreciated by those in the Truth community). Each case is heavily researched with a plethora of links, both within the article and in the sources section below, for all to do their own personal investigation, as we at The Last American Vagabond often advocate. Each conscientious truth seeker out there must not resign to simply take our word for it, or anyone else’s; each must seek their own conclusions. It is important to read this with an open mind and take the time to get educated because this issue is of the utmost importance.

Original Post: 

Two high-profile pedophilia cases have come to light in recent years, the abuses of Jerry Sandusky at Penn State and those of famed British entertainer Jimmy Savile. While both cases certainly garnered their fair share of media attention, their time in the spotlight has ended and we are led to believe that their horrific abuses were the result of a lone pedophile preying on children, while esteemed institutions turned a blind eye to their indiscretions.  

Occasionally, however, the media would pick up on a story such as “Jimmy Savile was part of satanic ring,”  or “Jerry Sandusky was part of pedophile ring, victim claims.” These stories seem absurd at first glance. Yet if they are investigated further, we are led down a horrific and disturbing rabbit hole of pedophiles populating positions of power in government, finance, and entertainment.

This post will lay out the evidence for an international pedophile ring of massive proportions. The information contained within is of tremendous importance, for we are sitting on our very own modern holocaust, a holocaust of children. I promise that this statement is by no means an exaggeration, and urge you to not be scared away by these walls of text, which are as concise as possible while still conveying the necessary information. Throughout, I will be completely transparent with my sources, and will not beat you over the head with conclusions, but rather present you with evidence and let you decide for yourselves.

THE DUTROUX AFFAIR

I will begin in Belgium, with a case known as the Dutroux affair. This case is important because it illustrates how investigations can be undermined by a cabal able to place its members in crucial positions of power, and how powerful people can be implicated in abusing children. The Dutroux affair was covered extensively by the mainstream media, and was huge news in Belgium, where 350,000 people took to the streets to protest the handling of the case, known as the famous White March, from a nation of just 10 million.

The case begins in 1995, when multiple young girls began disappearing around the area of Bertrix. Young girls had been disappearing in this area for a couple of years but the BOB (equivalent of the FBI) was unable to develop any solid leads. A breakthrough was made when a suspicious white van was reported, and the police were able to trace it to Marc Dutroux, a known pedophile. Dutroux had been released from prison just a few years earlier, after serving a third of his sentence, despite reservations among those involved in the hearing and his own mother, who had warned the parole board that he would certainly cause harm again.

It was also revealed that Dutroux, though unemployed and receiving welfare from the state, owned seven homes and lived quite lavishly, from his involvement in selling children and child porn. It turns out that his mother was right, and Dutroux was responsible for the recent abductions. Girls as young as 8 reportedly starved to death in a makeshift dungeon in his basement, after months of sexual abuse.

The knowledge of these horrible transgressions committed by Dutroux are widely available and thoroughly documented, and though disturbing, are not important enough to focus on this case. Now, I will attempt to highlight the incompetence of the investigating police, and the subsequent cover-up of evidence by the state. Police had investigated Dutroux multiple times without any arrests. Once, they entered his home and witnessed the outside of a makeshift dungeon in his basement, while two girls were being held and starved inside. They even reported hearing voices, though they said they believed Dutroux’s story that the voices were coming from the street outside.

Police ignored a tip from an informant, who said that Dutroux offered him between 3,000 and 5,000 dollars to kidnap young girls. Again and again, police failed to act on information, or acted with complete incompetence. Incredibly, Police had in their possession a video tape of Dutroux constructing the makeshift dungeon in one of his basements, and would have saved the lives of two girls who were being tortured while the police held on to the evidence, had they viewed the video tape and acted on it.

By September 1996, the official body count had reached 8, and public outrage over police incompetence mounted. Why had a known pedophile been released so early from his original prison term, and allowed to terrify a country while the police stumbled about, seemingly complicit in the carnage?

When the case transferred from the police to the courts, the coverup became much more egregious. The lead prosecutor, Jean-Marc Conorrette, was dismissed from the case, which drew huge criticism from across the nation. Conorette became a hero because it was his initiative that led to the police actually finding two girls in Dutroux’s captivity. He also was instrumental in finding the bodies of four more girls. Conorette would later break down in tears in court while describing the death threats he received when he was still involved with the investigation.

Fuel to the fire would be added when a highly regarded children’s activist, Marie France Botte, claimed that prosecutors were sitting on a politically sensitive list of high-profile customers of Dutrouxs thousands of video tapes.

Marc Verwilghen, the Flemish parliamentarian who became the most popular politician in the country after leading the inquiry into Dutroux, claimed that many in the Belgian establishment, including heads of government, refused to cooperate, and sought to stifle and ridicule his report. He claimed that magistrates and police were officially told to not answer certain questions, in what he described as a ‘characteristic smothering operation.’ He was further quoted as saying ‘For me, the Dutroux affair is a question of organized crime.’ A parliamentary panel revealed the names of 30 government officials it said were complicit in the hiding of Dutrouxs misdeeds, none have been punished.

The most important information on the case comes from a victim of Dutroux. Regina Louf was the first to come forward, and was candid about the abuse she received at the hands of Belgium’s child abuse networks. In 1996, she named and described in great detail, to a specially assembled police team, the people and places involved in the paedophile ring. Senior judges, one of the country’s most powerful politicians – now dead – and a very influential banker were included. The BBC article says,

“The sessions not only involved sex, they included sadism, torture and murder; and again, she described in detail, the place, the victims and how they were killed.”

She corroborated that one of Dutrouxs associates, Jean-Michel Nihoul, was instrumental in the abuse parties.

“At these parties Nihoul was a sort of party beast while Dutroux was more on the side.”

Nihoul had significant connections among Belgian political and financial elite. He confessed to organizing an orgy at a Belgian chateau attended by government officials. It emerged that Dutroux and Nihoul were part of a long distance child trafficking ring that imported children from Slovakia.

Let’s get back to the questioning of the witnesses. The primary witnesses to step forward all suffered from Dissociative Identity Disorder(DID). In 98% of DID cases, the person suffered extreme sexual abuse as a child. The abuse that the Dutroux witnesses attested to is beyond comprehension. Louf, and other witnesses, recounted being raped by dogs and snakes, and being forced to witness the murders of other children which were captured on video tape. That Louf spoke the truth about witnessing these murders is laid out here in an excellent manner.

She gave a tremendous amount of detail to her prosecutors that she simply could not have known without being there herself, and there is simply way too much evidence to lay it out here. I recommend reading the whole page, which is as long as a short book, as the research is simply phenomenal. She also reported being involved with Satanic rituals, which I will address in greater detail later in the post.

Despite evidence that linked Dutroux and Nihoul to abuse parties and murder snuff films, the prosecutor that replaced Conorette, Jacques Langlois, completely dismantled the investigation. He sent police out on false tips and helped spread disinformation in the media. Although nearly 100 high-profile people in government, religion, entertainment and finance being accused of involvement in child abuse, no one of significance other than Dutroux was ever jailed. Nine police officers would eventually be arrested in connection with the murders which also contained dozens of suspicious deaths among those who were helping the case. I have only presented a small picture of what amounts to a mountain of documentation on Dutroux. For further reading, look here and here.

I understand that my discussion on the Dutroux affair does not validate any of the claims in the title of this post. It is only one small piece of the puzzle. It shows how, from the bottom level of police work to the top-level of prosecution politics, people complicit with pedophiles can be placed into key positions to ensure that investigations never bear fruit. Now I will briefly highlight pedophile rings that operated parallel to Dutrouxs during the same time period, again in which no high level officials were brought to justice, although they undeniable participated, to illustrate how widespread the child porn and child abuse epidemic is. I will then move on to more important cases.

Parallel Occurrences

In Latvia, three top officials, including the Prime Minister, were named in connection with a pedophile ring in which 2000 children in the country were abused. An online ring known as Wonderland was busted and yielded 750,000 images of children. From the article:

“Wonderland originated in the United States but also operated in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and Britain.”

None of the men charged in relation to the ring served more than 30 months in jail, and only two were put on the sex offenders registry (in the year 2000!!!).

A child porn ring in Mexico was busted and said to have thousands of clients in the United States. Child porn videos reportedly made a Russian ring 410 million dollars being sold in Germany, Italy, and the United States. A Dutch ring was discovered in which images and videos of abuse of infants were circulated. A magistrate leading an investigation into an Italian pedophile ring denounced what he called a “paedophile lobby” of powerful politicians which he said openly obstructed his investigation. French police arrested 250 people associated with child pornography within a year of the Dutroux affair.

THE LINCOLN, NEBRASKA SCANDAL

From here on out the post gets more surreal. These child abuse and pedophile rings are not by any means limited to Europe. Rather, the United States has perhaps the biggest child trafficking epidemic in the world. It is important to note, before I begin the next segment of this post, that the FBI does not track statistics for missing children. Of all the statistics it keeps tabs on, rape, homicide, domestic abuse, what amounts to perhaps the single most important one in terms of citizen safety is ominously missing. Perhaps they simply do not want us to know how bad the epidemic is? It should also be noted that FBI prosecution of major child trafficking rings has been virtually non-existent.

Take a good look at this front page story, published on June 29, 1989. The first chapter reads:

“A homosexual prostitution ring is under investigation by federal and District authorities and includes among its clients key officials of the Reagan and Bush administrations, military officers, congressional aides, and U.S. and foreign businessmen with close social ties to Washingtons political elite, documents obtained by The Washington Times revealed.”

The story never fully hit the streets, as agents grabbed the copies from newstands in the early hours of the morning. Another good article for background before I move on to American organized pedophilia and satanism is this. The first paragraph reads:

“All nine children tell the same story, a grisly tale of being taken out of school and abused in a blue house. They name the same culprit, a school administrator who, they say, performs satanic rituals as part of his twisted routine. In the 14 months since the first child came forward, police said they have conducted 150 interviews and cannot substantiate the claims of the children, who range in age from 5 to 9. Prosecutor Stanley Levco is more blunt: He doesn’t believe them, and he plans to publicly clear the accused.”

I will now talk about America’s own Dutroux affair, which began in Lincoln, Nebraska, in the late 1980s. A good part of the story, minus the Satanism aspect, is covered in a documentary called The Conspiracy of Silence. The documentary was set to air on the Discovery Channel in 1994 but at the last minute, it was pulled and destroyed. We only have access to it now because of a “cutting room copy” leaked a year later. The story begins with Omaha businessman Lawrence King, who was a rising star in the Republican Party at the time. In 1988, it was revealed that he had diverted millions of dollars from the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union, the investigation of which spawned an investigation into a pedophilia ring of mind-blowing proportions. Soon enough, investigators into the embezzlement scandal began receiving reports of sexual abuse.

Omaha newspapers were running stories of how young boys from Boystown were being prostituted among local business leaders and sometimes traveled to Washington. Parties would include sex, and abuse such as “beatings with extension cords while naked.” Immediately, the FBI began claiming that there was no substance to the sexual abuse allegations. The stories of the victims told a drastically different story. “The older sister alleged that King arranged for her to fly to parties in Washington, D.C., and other cities where men engaged her in sexual activity.” Apparently, the abused were all foster children, and they would miss weeks of school each year taking these trips.

The head of the investigative committee, known as the Franklin Comittee, Gary Carodori, was also convinced of the rampant child abuse and was determined to bring perpetrators to justice. As a side note, you can view Caradori’s interviews with the victims here. Early on in the investigation, Gary Caradori would meet an untimely death, during a flight on his way to Chicago to review new evidence. There was a scattered wreckage pattern, indicating that the plane broke apart in the air, and not upon impact. The new head investigator would repeatedly lead the committee in the wrong direction, away from child abuse and satanic ritual claims. A state senator resigned from the investigative committee and said, “”I really don’t think the things Larry King knew will ever be made public.” He also cited concerns about the change in leadership.

A New York Times article confirms that state investigators were given thousands of files regarding sexual abuse from children and testimonies from people involved in the foster care and education system. What happened next is amazing. Instead of indicting the accused perpetrators to develop cases against them, Grand Juries twice ordered the thousands of files to be sealed, and then brought charges of perjury against some of the victims. The mainstream media did their part to defend the grand jury and to marginalize the testimonies of the victims. One of the victims was sentenced to 9-15 years in prison, and spent two years in solitary confinement. 8 years later the woman in question, Alisha Owen, was denied a hearing to commute her sentence. Lawrence King, however, would leave prison after just 10 years, being found guilty only of financial crimes.

As with the Dutroux affair, I have again only shown a small portion of a truly mind-blowing and exceptionally well documented story. Many victims in their interviews cited being forced to participate in satanic rituals, and had named King as a participant. What I hope I have laid out here is that there are certainly child prostitution rings in the United States and that kids are transported across the country for high-profile customers. When people get in the way of these activities, they are silenced or killed. To learn more about the Franklin Coverup (and there is a lot more to learn!!), read this book by John DeCamp, watch this documentary, and view this website which has a great collection of information.

PRESIDIO MILITARY BASE AB– USE

Unfortunately, the next step in this expose takes us to truly bizarre and disturbing places. A particularly disturbing child abuse case involving a military day care center came to light in 1987. Allegations of abuse involving 60 children, some infants, surfaced at the Presidio military base in San Francisco. I would like to point out that this article claims that child abuse allegations had surfaced at more than 30 military day care centers across the country in the previous 3 years before its publishing, including some of the most esteemed bases such as West Point and Fort Dix. It would be impossible to lay out the case for each one here, but I would like to share this quote from the San Jose Mercury News:

“Children at West Point told stories that would become horrifyingly familiar. They said they had been ritually abused. They said they had had excrement smeared on their bodies and been forced to eat feces and drink urine. They said they were taken away from the day care center and photographed.”

At the Presidio, at least 4 children were found to have chlamydia, and up to 60 had shown clear signs of abuse. The most important exposes into the Presidio case were written by Linda Goldston of the San Jose Mercury News. In an article entitled, “Abuse Case at Presidio Quietly Closed By U.S.,” the events are told in chilling detail. The first victims to come forward were aged 3 and 4. Interestingly, the Presidio child care center was not closed until over a year after these allegations came to light. Initially charges were only brought against one man, Gary Hambright, a civilian employee.

Later, however, it was revealed that police were investigating a man named Michael Aquino, a Lt. Col. Aquino was the founder of a satanic church known as The Temple of Set. Army documents showed that children were often taken on unnanounced trips outside the center, and many children could accurately describe Aquinos house. The search of Aquinos house got investigators thousands of videos and photographs, and what appeared to be a soundproof room, but charges were never brought against him.

The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry wrote an extensive analysis of the victims of the Presidio. They stated:

“The severity of the trauma for children at the Presidio was immediately manifest in clear cut symptoms. Before the abuse was exposed, parents had already noticed the following changes in their children: vaginal discharge, genital soreness, rashes, fear of the dark, sleep disturbances, nightmares, sexually provocative language, and sexually inappropriate behavior. In addition, the children were exhibiting other radical changes in behavior, including temper outbursts, sudden mood shifts, and poor impulse control. All these behavioral symptoms are to be expected in preschool children who have been molested.”

The San Jose Mercury News expanded on the story a few months later with an article entitled “Army of the Night.” This article dives into the satanic aspect of the child abuse at the Presidio. Satanism had apparently surfaced at the Presidio years earlier. Military Police had investigated some buildings after reports of a man dressed in all black holding a little girls hand had been reported. An MP was recorded as saying:

“We kicked the door open and here’s this nice little bedroom. In a corner was a mannequin with a gun aimed at the door. On the left side, there was a bunk against the wall. There was a pentagram on the floor, a huge one. There were dolls’ heads all over the ceiling, just off-the-wall stuff… We were sitting there, we’ve got a cult on the Presidio of San Francisco and nobody cares about it.

“We were told by the provost marshal to just forget about it.”

As a side note, in February 1987, Aquino appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show and gave a passionate defense of his Satanic beliefs. On the Autumnal equinox of 1987, an occult day of importance, fire would strike a building adjacent to the daycare center, destroying many records relating to the center. A month later, fire would destroy the day care center itself. The ATF found that the causes of both fires had been arson, contrary to the Army which claimed faulty wiring. Prosecutors would once again bring charges against Gary Hambright, but suspiciously they did not include the allegations of children with serious documented abuse such as missing hymens and rectal lesions. Apparently, the children were chosen on the basis of who would make the best witnesses. The strategy did not pan out, the judge ruled the charges as “too vague” and Hambright walked free, and no charges were again brought against the Presidio military base daycare center.

FALSE MEMORIES SYNDROME FOUNDATION

The next case I will address is known as the McMartin Preschool abuse scandal. But before I delve into that, I need to address the False Memories Syndrome Foundation, FMSF. They are a prominent group promoting the idea that children who claim they have been abused in satanic rituals have either wild imaginations, or were prodded along by zealot psychologists. They have been tremendously successful in their mission. Recently a Reddit post promoting the false memory theory received over 2000 upvotes in r/TIL. Members of FMSF have been called to appear as expert witnesses in dozens of court cases. I have already established that there have been hundreds of different children reporting satanic abuse not only across the country, but in different continents as well. This alone should be enough to make the false memory theory very flimsy.

However, there is a lot more interesting information about the FMSF to discuss. A huge amount of members within the FMSF have not only been accused of pedophilia themselves, but are also a part of the military industrial complex. Peter J. Freyd founded the FMSF after being accused of sexual abuse by his daughter. David Dinges, a member of the scientific advisory board of the FMSF, was involved with Navy Intelligence. Harold Leif was involved with CIA mind control experiments. Paul McHugh has been a very vocal critic of Dissociative Identity Disorder and has worked at many military hospitals. Martin T. Orne was funded by MKULTRA Harvard CrimsonRalph Underwager claimed it was ‘gods will’ when adults engage in sex with children. There are more suspicious members of the FMSF but I feel that this list suffices.

I will end this paragraph with a quote from the Columbia Journalism Review:

“Rarely has such a strange and little-understood organization had such a profound effect on media coverage of such a controversial matter. The [False Memory Syndrome] foundation is an aggressive, well-financed PR machine adept at manipulating the press, harassing its critics, and mobilizing a diverse army of psychiatrists, outspoken academics, expert defense witnesses, litigious lawyers, Freud bashers, critics of psychotherapy, and devastated parents.”

MCMARTIN PRESCHOOL AB– USE

Now, on to the McMartin Preschool case. The McMartin preschool, located in California, was the center of a massive child prostitution and pornography ring, and appears to be the center of an equally massive coverup. Concerns began in August 1983, when a mother told police that her two-year old son had been sexually abused. By 1984, 360 children had come forward claiming abuse. A significant number showed physical evidence of abuse. These kids also described wild satanic rituals they were forced to participate it, such as eating feces, necrophilia and coprophilia, with some claims as bizarre as a babies head being chopped off, and being forced to drink the blood. The children told stories of being transported in underground tunnels.

The mainstream media did their best to discredit the tunnel theory. However, archeologist E. Gary Stickel, PhD conducted a study of the McMartin preschool grounds, which you can read here. The survey was conducted in 1990, after the property had been sold, and long after charges against the abuse perpetrators had been dropped, and the victims thoroughly marginalized in the mainstream media, with help from the FSMF. Stickel found two extensive tunnel systems underneath the preschool, which accurately reflected the testimonies given by the children.

In summation, the media and government would have us believe that 360 children all invented false memories of horrific satanic abuse, of participating in rituals in which adults sheathed in black ceremonial robes uttered chants, that they lied about being transported for prostitution across town, and that they lied about being photographed and videotaped for child pornography, despite verification of emotional and physical abuse in most of the children as well as the existence of tunnels under the complex. Again, the victims were marginalized in the press, the FBI denied any legitimate claims, the prosecution harassed victims endlessly in court, and all charges were eventually dropped.

THE FINDERS

In 1987 the New York Times ran a story about a little known cult called “The Finders.” The first paragraph reads:

“Police officials here said today that six disheveled children found in Tallahassee, Fla., might be the offspring of members of a little-known cult, but the officials said they had not ruled out the possibility of kidnapping.”

The Finders had previously been described in the media:

“In appearance, the Finders—mostly middle-aged men, always in dark suits—wouldn’t be out of place managing a local funeral home. But the behavior of the handful of adherents has people wondering whether they arrived by flying saucer.

“Townspeople say the Finders constantly walk the streets, following people home and taking extensive notes and pictures. They often appear at local council meetings, never saying a word but simply observing the scene. At other times, they plunder the visitor’s center of brochures, maps, and local travel guides. And they haunt the courthouse, scouring land deeds to find out who owns the local real estate.”

Who are these suspicious people, and what were they doing with 6 undocumented children, transporting them across the country? The children were found to show signs of sexual abuse. Customs agents raided one the Finders compounds, and found detailed instructions on obtaining children for unknown purposes and several photographs of nude children.

The US News and World Report article continues:

“The more the police learned about the Finders, the more bizarre they seemed: There were suggestions of child abuse, Satanism, dealing in pornography and ritualistic animal slaughter. None of the allegations was ever proved, however. The child abuse charges against the two men in Tallahassee were dropped.”

The stories about The Finders quickly died down, but would not disappear entirely, as rumors linking The Finders to the CIA persisted. According to the US News and World Report,

“Customs Service documents reveal that in 1987, when Customs agents sought to examine the evidence gathered by Washington, D.C., police, they were told that the Finders investigation ‘had become a CIA internal matter.’ The police report on the case had been classified secret.”

Florida congressman Tom Lewis was quoted as saying:

“’Could our own government have something to do with this Finders organization and turned their backs on these children? That’s what all the evidence points to,” says Lewis. “And there’s a lot of evidence. I can tell you this: We’ve got a lot of people scrambling, and that wouldn’t be happening if there was nothing here.’“

A connection was produced, and confirmed by the CIA: A firm that provided computer training to CIA officers also employed several members of the Finders. Anyone researching the CIA will come to the conclusion that the organization does not contract training out to other sources, it only ever creates proprietary organizations.

***

This was an extensive compilation of research that should not be taken at face value, as nothing today truly should, but should be used as a starting point for those wanting to know the truth and not the State-sponsored comforting lie. That is not to imply that the information is suspect or possibly incorrect, but rather that with such a profoundly disturbing and relevant topic such as this, it is paramount that one come to their own conclusions and not simply accept another’s findings. All of the information here within is sourced back to mainstream sources(for those who still feel that holds some measure of legitimacy) and actual documented events and investigations. Please forward this to anyone who needs to see actual documentation of events. 

Sources: 

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1cm0t3/original_research_the_mountain_of_evidence_for_a/) http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/370439/Jimmy-Savile-was-part-of-satanic-ringhttp://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/120929/jerry-sandusky-was-part-pedophile-ring-victim-clhttp://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/16/news/16iht-brussels.2.t.html?pagewanted=allhttp://www.nytimes.com/1996/10/21/world/275000-in-belgium-protest-handling-of-child-sex-scandal.html, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3522367.stm, http://www.nbcnews.com/id/4422016/#.UW5SDyc3uqYhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/feb/28/childprotection.dutrouxhttp://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/02/18/court-keeps-convicted-pedophile-killer-marc-dutroux-in-prison-in-belgium/, http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/predators/dutroux/evil_1.html, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/jun/17/stephenbateshttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/apr/21/stephenbateshttp://www.nytimes.com/1996/10/15/world/belgian-hero-dismissed.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/belgium/1456107/Judge-tells-of-murder-plots-to-block-Dutroux-investigation.htmlhttp://articles.latimes.com/1996-09-02/news/mn-39974_1_death-penalty, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/apr/21/stephenbates, http://articles.latimes.com/1998/jan/03/news/mn-4579/2, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent_europe/1962244.stm, http://www.whale.to/c/belgians_shocked.htmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent_europe/1962263.stmhttp://www.merckmanuals.com/home/mental_health_disorders/dissociative_disorders/dissociative_fugue.html?qt=&sc=&alt=, http://www.librarything.com/work/7563984/get, https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/dutroux/Belgian_X_dossiers_the_accused.htmhttp://articles.latimes.com/1996-09-11/news/mn-42591_1_police-officers%255D%2520but%2520none%2520of%2520their%2520superiors.%2520%255BTHIS%2520LIST,%2520ISGP%255D(https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/dutroux/Belgian_X_dossiers_alleged_assassinations.htmhttp://articles.latimes.com/2000/feb/19/news/mn-526, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1109787.stm, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2001/feb/14/internetnews.childprotectionhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/31554.stmhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2000/sep/29/philipwillanhttp://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/19/world/dutch-say-a-sex-ring-used-infants-on-internet.html, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/italian-politicians-obstructing-inquiry-into-child-porn-on-net-635183.html, http://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/14/world/french-police-arrest-250-men-linked-to-child-pornography-ring.htmlhttp://www.franklincase.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26:king-expands-into-food-service-something-on-every-burner-jan-12-1985-&catid=6:news-articles&Itemid=14, http://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/16/us/army-will-close-child-care-center.html, http://articles.latimes.com/1988-05-01/local/me-3161_1_mcmartin-case, http://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/24/us/longest-trial-post-mortem-collapse-child-abuse-case-so-much-agony-for-so-little.html, http://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/08/us/inquiry-spreads-on-6-children-and-cult.html

Source

The Lucy Stein Gang Rides Into Moscow

Israel Shamir — The Unz Review Sept 18, 2017

Can the Putin Fans League win municipal elections in New York City? Not bloody likely, you’ll murmur, and probably justifiably so. However, in the municipal elections last week, pro-American forces captured one third of the seats in Moscow. A great shock, slightly mitigated by the media silence that accompanied both the election and its results.
As a rule, I do not dwell much on internal Russian politics (as opposed to foreign relations). They are parochial, obscure and not democratic. That is true for internal politics in every country I am aware of, but in Russia, they aren’t even competitive. Kremlin wiseguys try and fix the results with all the subtleness of Democratic primaries under Ms Debbie Wasserman Schultz. This time they had a seemingly brilliant idea: wouldn’t it be nice if few people would turn up at the election booths? Only those requested to vote? So they had zero publicity, zero announcements, zero TV coverage. People were vaguely aware of the municipal elections but the affair was so low profile that very few cared to attend: slightly over ten per cent of the electorate. The cynical subterfuge flopped badly.
Russian police investigate the body of Boris Nemtsov, a former Russian deputy prime minister and opposition leader at Red Square with St. Basil Cathidral in the background in Moscow on Saturday, 28 Feb, 2015. Click to enlarge

Russian police investigate the body of Boris Nemtsov, a former Russian deputy prime minister and opposition leader at Red Square with St. Basil Cathidral in the background in Moscow on Saturday, 28 Feb, 2015. Click to enlarge

In Moscow (which is the only place in Russia that counts) the three main opposition parties, the Communists and the Nationalists, as well as Kremlin-friendly Socialists, were been decimated. Their votes had been snatched by pro-Western liberals, self-described as “those of good genes”, “the fair-faced ones”, “handshake-worthy”; all these epithets vaguely connected in Russian mind with prosperous Jewishness, of sorts, or with Jewified Soviet nomenclature. The best-known names include Ms Lucy Stein, a young Jewish journalist of some notoriety – she installed plaster copies of her breasts and filmed a staged act of a little boy being roughly treated by Putin’s police. Another one is Mr Maxim Katz, a young Jewish activist – he organized the delivery of flowers to the place of the opposition leader Mr Nemtsov’s assassination, allegedly with some profit for himself.
These youngsters (in their early twenties) have been led by Mr Dmitry Gudkov, a Russian Parliament Member and a son of a Russian Parliament Member. This sounds like the House of Lords, but Gudkov the Senior is an ex-KGB colonel, an oligarch and the owner of a bailiff business, rather than a hereditary peer. Gudkov’s people made a loose coalition with Yabloko (Apple, in Russian), a liberal party of some prominence in the Yeltsin years. They are against Putin’s policies, for the restoration of the Crimea to the Ukraine and for an alliance with the liberal West.
While other parties didn’t give a hoot, the liberals cared to come to the neglected elections, and they delivered their voters to the booths. For that purpose, they imported American technology, and one of Sanders’ operatives, a Russian-born Mr Vitali Shklyarov, who had come to set up what they called “a political Uber”, a web app for fielding candidates and getting voters. In addition, they vastly overspent their competitors.
Democracy in action? Forsooth! This was a clear-cut example of real (as opposed to imaginary) interference in foreign elections. While endless FBI probes have never produced any tangible proof of Russian interference in the US elections, and the Facebook investigation “revealed that it had sold as much as $150,000 in political ads to pro-Kremlin entities between 2015 and 2017”, the US interference in recent Moscow elections had been vast, powerful and effective. The pro-American forces spent over sixty million dollar in Moscow alone by very conservative estimates, and probably much more. And the funds came from abroad.
The very idea of Russian interference in the US elections had been flattering but silly. The Russians are not in the same league, in speaking of political technologies. The Americans are much more masterful, being trained in a competitive environment. The Russians’ only chance to have fair elections is adopting another American technology, namely the active fight against foreign interference. The Kremlin could and should investigate the path of every US buck to the Stein-Katz Gang, and deal with it as harshly as Americans are dealing with imaginary Russian interference. But would they? I doubt it. The wiseguys who mismanaged elections for Kremlin will do all they can to kill the story. No important Russian media carried it, by direct orders from Kremlin.
Khordovsky during his trial in Moscow. Click to enlarge

Khordovsky during his trial in Moscow. Click to enlarge

We have proof to back up our claims of the US interference in the Russian elections: a confession made by the coordinator for Open Russia, a political body created by Mr Michael Khodorkovsky. This oligarch, once the richest man in Russia, did nine years in a Russian jail for massive tax evasion, white-collar crimes, organized crime and conspiracy for murder, as brutal and ruthless a shark as ever swam murky waters of Russian business and politics.
Mr Khodorkovsky had been an American agent of influence for many years. Since being pardoned by President Putin, he moved abroad and became the focal point for the US-led clandestine campaign for regime change in Russia. Together with other exiled (and wanted) oligarchs, Tel Aviv-based Mr Nevzlin and London-based Mr Chichvarkin, Mr Khodorkovsky funnels money to Russia’s pro-Western opposition.
His coordinator Ms Maria Baronova had been quite close to Mr Khodorkovsky but parted with him some time ago. In her Facebook blog she admits that “Gudkov and Katz are a secret project of M. B. Khodorkovsky” while other elements of the opposition are a public project of Mr Khodorkovsky. In other words, the whole campaign has been organized from Washington, or perhaps from Langley.
As we learned from Wikileaks-published State Department cables, this is the current trend of CIA for orchestrating regime change: instead of sending money directly to the opposition with a courier, they employ oligarchs as go-between. This mode has been used in Syria since 2006, as well as in Lebanon, and now is being applied in Moscow.
The winners of the recent municipal elections in Moscow weren’t just the “fair-faced” children of nomenclature, but appointees of the US deep state. They did it using American know-how and American money. This is the real and very successful interference, and the organisers got away with it.
The Russian post-Soviet political system as organized by Putin’s wiseguys should share the blame. The Communists, Nationalists of Mr Zhirinovsky and Socialists of Mr Mironov have been tamed and house-broken so efficiently that they lost their balls, their will power, their desire for victory – and their voters, as well. People stopped to care about them. The ruling party United Russia isn’t better; it is a toothless clone of the toothless CPSU, the late Soviet Union Communist Party that was dismantled by Gorbachev and Yeltsin without a single objection from millions of card-carrying members. It is a party of people who want to have power and its privileges.
The Ukraine had been ruled by a similar Party of the Regions. Led by Mr Victor Yanukovych, the party fell to pieces after the coup, its members deserting the sinking ship as fast as they could. United Russia will also run away in a case of trouble; they will helplessly watch Mr Khodorkovsky enter the gates of the Kremlin and probably applaud him. The United Russia’s 70% of vote is no guarantee of support for Mr Putin’s independent course. It would be better for Putin to rely upon smaller but more reliable and devoted cadres. Lenin used to say, ‘a small anchovy is better than a big cockroach’.
(This is true for other countries, too, as Mr Trump and Mr Corbyn discovered: their big parties just aren’t reliable. A small and reliable party of their dedicated supporters would be a better bet.)
The Kremlin spokesmen comfort themselves and others by stressing very limited powers of the elected deputies. By law, they may deal with municipal questions only. However, it is not unusual for such bodies to reach for more power in a revolutionary situation. In France, in 1789, the elected parliament was intended to be an advisory to the monarch, but very soon it assumed all the powers and chopped off the king’s head. In the USSR, in 1991, the Russian Federation parliament had very few rights being subservient to the Soviet parliament, but it assumed rights and broke up the USSR.
Forget about Mr Navalny. Perhaps we should get used to the idea that the next president of Russia will be called Maxim Katz, and Lucy Stern his Foreign Minister. That is, unless Mr Putin will do a better job at the forthcoming Presidential elections.
Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net
This article was first published at The Unz Review.

 

Was WW2 a Genocidal War on Germany?

henrymakow.com — Sept 17, 2017

Mainstream (((media))) endorsed sterilization of 48 million Germans before any Jewish mass murders took place. Click to enlarge

Mainstream (((media))) endorsed sterilization of 48 million Germans before any Jewish mass murders took place. Click to enlarge

Does the focus on the Jewish holocaust obscure the fact that World War Two may have been a genocidal war on Germany by the Illuminati central bankers? 
It seems farfetched but, if we consider that Angela Merkel is pursuing a genocidal migrant policy today, this “revisionist” interpretation may have merit. 
I present six excerpts that support the view that the Illuminati had a long-term policy of exterminating Germans, which has been extended to white nations in general.  
1) Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the “American Federation for Peace.” The first edition of this slim volume was published in early 1941. The United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.
Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a “sensational idea.”
goebbelsGermany’s propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. “This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy,” Goebbels privately commented. “If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn’t have done a better job.”
At his direction, the German press played up Kaufman’s call for genocide. A front-page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a “Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People” and a work of “Old Testament Hatred.” Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.
(More examples at link):
“There remains but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism — and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough. Sterilization has become a byword of science, as the best means of ridding the human race of its misfits: the degenerate, the insane, the hereditary criminal […….]When one realizes that such health measures as vaccination and serum treatments are considered as direct benefits to the community, certainly sterilization of the German people cannot but be considered a great health measure promoted by humanity to immunize itself forever against the virus of Germanism.”
“The population of Germany, excluding conquered and annexed territories, is about 70,000,000 almost equally divided between male and female. To achieve the purpose of German extinction it would be necessary to only sterilize some 48,000,000 — a figure which excludes, because of their limited power to procreate, males over 60 years of age, and females over 45.”

2) Hooton Plan …

 

Continues …

Tony Blair thought he was the MESSIAH and often wore MAKE-UP, ex-PM’s former friend claims

Patrick Christys — Express.co.uk July 8, 2016

Blair darkmoon3

Robert Harris, a best-selling novelist and former journalist, said that Mr Blair had a “messianic” view of politics and the Chilcot Report was like “him being nailed to the cross”.

Mr Harris shed light on personal details about Mr Blair, such as his reported desire to wear makeup regularly.

He said: “He often wore make-up, even when he wasn’t on TV.

“Maybe it just appealed to his sense of always being a performer.”

Adding to the notion of Mr Blair is a very egotistical leader, Mr Harris declared his shock at Mr Blair’s view of himself and also how much he has disintegrated mentally.

The 59-year-old said: “He had a very personal messianic view of politics. As things went wrong he developed a kind of messianic strategy that really almost reached full flowering with the publication of the Chilcot Report.

“It was like Christ nailed to the cross.

“You can never be sure where the public performance ends and the man begins – he was playing Christ on the cross.

He added: “He’s morphed into a figure that’s not quite of this world.

“He said all prime ministers go mad in the end but none have gone quite as strange as Tony Blair.”

The former BBC journalist also revealed how M Blair wanted to rule the country largely by himself, shunning his Cabinet’s involvement where possible.

He said: “The first warning sign I got was discussing Cabinet meetings at Chequers.

“He wanted meetings to be one 45-minute session every week as opposed to two hours twice a week.

“I realised it would be a very personal, one-man government.”

Source