The Occult Symbolism of the movie "Metropolis" and its Importance in Pop Culture

The Occult Symbolism of the movie “Metropolis” and its Importance in Pop Culture

Direct link to visually rich Vigilant Citizen – October 19, 2010

Fritz Lang’s 1927 movie “Metropolis” is one of those timeless classics that withstand the test of time. Rather than becoming forgotten and obsolete, “Metropolis” is increasingly relevant as many of its predictions are becoming reality. We will look at the  underlying occult message of the film and the usage of its imagery in the acts of  pop stars such as Lady Gaga, Madonna, Beyonce, Kylie Minogue and others.

 Metropolis is a silent science-fiction movie released in 1927 by Fritz Lang, a master of German Expressionism. Set in a futuristic dystopia divided into two distinct and separate classes—the thinkers and the workers—Metropolis describes the struggles between the two opposite entities. Knowing that it was produced in 1927, viewing this movie today is quite an experience as many “sci-fi” aspects of the plot are eerily close to reality. Metropolis describes a society where the “New World Order” has already taken been implemented and a select elite live in luxury while a dehumanized mass work and live in a highly monitored hell.

 As we have seen in previous articles on The Vigilant Citizen, Metropolis is excessively echoed in popular culture, especially in the music business. Whether it be in music videos or photo shoots, pop stars are often portrayed as the character Maria, an android programmed to corrupt the morals of the workers and to incite a revolt, giving the elite an excuse to use violence repression. Are pop stars used by the elite in the same matter, to corrode the morals of the masses?

Movie Analysis

The Workers

The movie opens by showing the workers and their city, situated deep below the earth’s surface. They are shown dressed alike, walking in sync, holding their heads down in submission, resignation and desperation. Throughout the movie, the human cattle is depicted as being physically and mentally exhausted, highly impressionable and, let’s say it, all-around dumb. Like a flock of sheep, the workers move in crowds, are very impressionable and can easily be deceived. This description of the masses corroborates those of Walter Lippmann, an American thinker who, five years earlier in Public Opinion, compared the general public to a “bewildered herd” that is not qualified to manage its own destiny. Joseph Goebbels, the head of propaganda of the Nazi regime, was also in accord with the movie’s conception of the general public. Hitler famously said “How fortunate for leaders that men do not think”.

The workers labor in a monstrous machine, a hellish industrial complex where they must accomplish repetitive and dehumanizing tasks. At one point, the machine is compared to Moloch, the ancient Semitic deity honored by human sacrifices.

 The tasks assumed by the workers are purely mechanical, needing absolutely no brain power, making them nothing more than an extension of the machine.

The Thinker s

If the workers live in a hellish underground dystopia, the thinkers conversely evolve in a gleaming utopia, a magnificent testimony of human achievement. This shiny city could not, however, be sustained without the existence of the Machine (Moloch) and its herds of workers. On the other hand, the Machine would not exist without the need to sustain a city. We find here a dualistic relation where two opposite entities exist in mutual dependence, a concept that has deep occult resonance.

 Joh Fredersen, the Demi-God

The city was founded, built and is run by the autocratic Joh Fredersen. As the creator and only ruler of Metropolis, Fredersen is likened to the Gnostic demiurge, a demi-god who is creator and ruler of the material world.

Joh’s son, named Freder, who, like all sons of managers, was enjoying a life of luxury, discovers the harsh reality of the workers of down under. Wanting to experience the worker’s reality first-hand, Freder descends to the lower level and trades places with a worker. Freder therefore becomes a Christ-like figure, a savior who descends from above. He also becomes enamoured with Maria, a saintly young women from the proletariat.

Maria

Maria is a charismatic woman that is highly admired by her fellow workers. Understanding their suffering and despair, and knowing that a revolt is brewing, Maria preaches peace and patience, prophesying the coming of a “mediator”, who would become the “heart between the head (the thinkers) and the hand (the workers)

At one point, Maria tells the story of the tower of Babel, upon which would be written:

“Great is the world and its Creator! And great is Man!”

This statement has a deep resonance in Mystery Schools as it is taught that men have the potential to become gods through enlightenment. Throughout the ages, monuments and architecture were used to communicate the principles of the Mysteries and to celebrate the greatness of the human mind. Partially for those reasons, there are numerous links between Freemasonry and the Tower of Babel.

 “As regards to Masonry, Babel of course represented a Masonic enterprise and early expositors reaped full benefit from the facts. They remembered that the people, who were of ‘one language and one speech’ journeyed from the East to the West, like those who have been tried and proved as Master Masons. When they reached an abiding place in the land Shinar, it is affirmed that they dwelt therein as Noachide, being the first characteristic name of Masons. It was here that they built their high tower of confusion. Out of evil comes good, however, and the confusion of tongues gave rise to ‘the ancient practice of Masons conversing without the use of speech.’”
-Arthur Edward Waite, A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and of Cognate Instituted Mysteries: Their Rites, Literature and History, Volume I

 “In several early Masonic manuscripts – for example, the Harleian, Sloane, Lansdowne, and Edinburgh-Kilwinning – it is stated that the craft of initiated builders existed before the Deluge, and that its members were employed in the building of the Tower of Babel.”
- Manly P. Hall,
The Secret Teachings of All Ages

 “… at the making of the Tower of Babel there was Masonry first much esteemed of, and Nimrod was a Mason himself and loved well Masons.”
- John T Lawrence, The Perfect Ashlar

 However, says Maria, “one man’s hymns of praise became the other man’s curse”. In other words, the monument praising the greatness of the human spirit was built with the blood and sweat of workers who knew nothing of the Thinker’s grand vision. And, in the film, the same thing is happening all over again. The name of the demi-god Joh Fredersen’s headquarters? Of course … The New Tower of Babel.

Rotwang

Upon learning that the workers are planning an uprising, Joh Federsen seeks the advice of Rotwang, an inventor and mad scientist. Although his work utilizes the latest of technologies, many clues within the movie indicate that he also taps into ancient occult knowledge to create his inventions. He is said to live in “a small house overlooked by the centuries,” symbolically meaning that the scientist’s arcana descended from ancient occult traditions; the basement of his house has a secret trap door leading to 2,000 year-old catacombs, further alluding to the ancient and mysterious sources of Rotwang. Furthermore, the front door of his house bears a pentagram, which refers to the Pythagoreans, occultism and Freemasonry.

If we were to do real-life comparisons, Rotwang is to Joh Fredersen what John Dee was to Queen Elizabeth I: an esteemed advisor immersed in the worlds of science, magic, astrology and Hermetic philosophy. If Fredersen represents our world’s rulers, Rotwang is the occult pendant of decision-making, the mystical entity that is hidden from the public but always historically present.

The inventor proudly presents to Fredersen his latest invention, the Machine-Man, which he considers to be the “Man of the Future”. The android has the faculty of taking the form of any person and, says Rotwang, “no one will be able to tell a Machine Man from a mortal!”. The transhumanist dream was already present back in the early 1920s.

 Fredersen then tells Rotwang to give the Machine-Man the likeness of Maria in order to use her credibility and charisma to spread corruption among the workers.

 So what do today’s pop stars have in common with this android, programmed by the rulers, with a mix of science and occultism? Well … everything.

 Metropolis themes are also very prevalent in fashion.

 Back to the movie. The android completed, Rotwang tells it:

“I want you to visit those in the depths, in order to destroy the work of the woman in whose image you were created!”

Robot-maria responds: One eye closed with devilish grin. You probably know the importance of the single eye from previous articles and the ridiculous amount of pop artists who flash it.

 The Maria android is then sent to Yoshiwara, a man’s club, where she performs erotic dances. In one of her acts, she is portrayed as Babylon, the Great Harlot from the Apocalypse.

Playing the role of the Great Harlot Babylon of the Book of Revelation. “And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, having a golden cup in her hand”. She is held up by the seven deadly sins.

Do this scene remind you of a classic music video? Madonna – Material Girl. How many realized that she was playing the role of Babylon here?

The programmed Maria performs mesmerizing dances in front of an avid public, causing men to fight, to lust, to be jealous and to commit the rest of the deadly sins. When she’s with her fellow workers,  Maria acts as an “agent-provocateur”, inciting the working men to riot and giving Joh Fredersen reason to use force against them. She is basically acting against the best interest of the public and for the interest of the elite.

With the help of their foreman (because they can’t really think for themselves), the workers ultimately realize that they have been mislead by the android. Believing that she’s a witch, they find robot-Maria and burn her at the stake.

 A bunch of things happen after that, but I won’t spoil the ending for you (though can you really be mad at someone for spoiling the ending of a 83-year old movie?). The movie finishes with this caption.

 This “moral of the story” is basically a message to the elite, a tip to keep the masses in check: in order to keep the oppressed content, you must capture their heart. That is what the media accomplish.

 Which is kind of reminiscent of this music video ending.

 Madonna’s Express Yourself video heavily borrowed its imagery from Metropolis. In turn, Christina Aguilera’s Not Myself Tonight, heavily borrowed from Express Yourself.

 The Moral of the Story

The moral of the story of Metropolis is not “let’s abolish all inequities and rebuild a world where everyone is equal” and it is certainly not “let’s be democratic and vote for who we want as a ruler.” It is more “let’s send the workers back to the depths where they belong, but with the addition of a mediator, who will be the link between the workers and the thinkers”. So, when all is said and done, the movie is intrinsically “elitist,” as it still calls for the existence of an elite group of people holding most of the resources and managing a working class. In the end, the workers – and Freder – were duped, believing that their conditions would change. In fact, the status-quo remained and Joh even got his naive son to give the elite a friendly image while reporting everything happening in the depths, resulting in tighter surveillance and control.

 Who is the Freder of today’s working class? The media. Media is the mediator. That is its function.

 Mass media manipulate the masses’ thoughts and feelings on a daily basis, tricking them into loving their oppression. Popular culture is the entertainment branch of mass media and pop music is the fun way to communicate the elite’s message to the youth. References to Metropolis in pop music are almost winks to those in the know, the initiates, as if to say “this star is working for us”. So go ahead and be an ignorant, degenerate and materialistic person, like in the videos … that’s what they want you to be.

Analogies Between Metropolis and Today’s Pop Culture

But why Metropolis? Why has it become the code for “Illuminati star”? If you’ve read other articles on this site, you’ve probably realized that the movie touches upon all of the themes of today’s “Illuminati agenda”: transhumanism, mind control, dark occultism, degradation of morals, police state, all-seeing government. Metropolis is basically a blueprint for population control. Like Maria, today’s pop stars are recruited from the working class and literally programmed and reinvented to become the hidden ruler’s spokespersons. Notice how many pop stars have wild alter-egos, with a different name and personality. Part of the stars’ role is to promote the elite’s agenda through music and videos, making it sexy and attractive.

In Conclusion

Metropolis is a definitely a movie “by the elite, for the elite”. It tackles the concerns of those managing the world and presents a solution that does not disturb the status-quo. The movie is also permeated with Masonic symbolism and contains many symbols referring to ancient Mysteries which were meant to be decoded by proper initiates. In other words, the movie was primarily aimed at the ruling class.

 So why do singers love it so much? Well they probably don’t love it as much as those behinds the scenes, the directors and image-makers, those who have power in the music business. They decide what the stars do and stand for. And today’s popular culture is elitist, permeated with Illuminati symbolism and promotes moral degradation and the debasement of traditional values. Our pop stars channel Maria, the programmed android, through their acts and accomplish the same functions. Why else would they dress like her? If artists always embodied absolute freedom and creativity, why do singers play the role of a mind-controlled android? Because that’s what they are.

 Metropolis is indeed a great movie. So great that it is only becoming relevant 80 years after its release. But if the elite have it their way, it will be even more relevant in the years to come.

Source

Who Are The Illuminati?

By Richard Stone 

“A loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires” (Paul Simon).
“The world is governed by far different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes” (Benjamin Disraeli).
“Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes the laws” (Mayer Rothschild).

Conspiracy theory is the theory that most of the world is secretly governed by a small group of men who operate behind the scenes. Conspiracy theory is now an accepted turn of phrase but sometimes one hears the expression, sometimes whispered rather than spoken. “The Illuminati”.

What does this mean? Who are the Illuminati? They are, in essence, a cartel of international bankers and industrialists based in Western Europe and North America. The names of certain families persist over long periods of time. Some of the most important names are Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Lazard, Warburg, Schroder and Schiff.

The pivotal family is probably the house of Rothschild, the descendants of Mayer Rothschild (1743 – 1812) of Frankfurt. The male descendants of this family, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. The family established banking institutions in Vienna, London, Naples and Paris as well as Frankfurt. Ever since the middle ages, these families have been building their power by lending money at rates of interest to the monarchies and governments of Europe who were forever in debt, particularly in times of war. Sooner than tax the population to raise funds, always an unpopular measure, they usually preferred to borrow money from the money-lenders. This was the birth of the concept “the national debt.” The countries of the world are forever in debt but where there is a debtor there is a creditor – who is this money owed to? It is owed to this coterie of international bankers.

By the nineteenth century the power of the Rothschild family was immense. They increased their wealth with great cunning and cleverness, while maintaining a low public profile. A notable example of their methods was their exploitation of the battle of Waterloo. The Rothschilds had spies watching the course of the battle and as soon as became evident that Wellington had won, a Rothschild agent traveled at maximum speed to London, arriving hours before Wellington’s own messenger. Rothschild received the messenger and began conspicuously selling his stocks. The whole stock exchange assumed that Wellington had lost and Napoleon had won so everybody started selling, at this point, other Rothschild agents bought up huge stocks at give-away prices. Thus an already massive fortune was massively increased.

The Rockefeller family may be equally important. The pivotal figure in this family was J.D.Rockefeller, who made his fortune out of Standard Oil or Esso in Ohio and Pennsylvania. He also controlled the railroads. When rival road transport systems were established he attempted to block them by parking his trains across the roads at level crossings. His basic business technique was the elimination of competitors at all costs, followed by the establishment of a monopoly, followed by profit taking. He rapidly gained a name for huge wealth, secrecy and hard and dirty business practice. In his later years he had a harsh and gaunt appearance, so to counter his bad “public image” JD more or less invented the PR industry. He had short films of himself made, calculated to charm the public, himself playing golf with a pretty little child for instance. This film was shown on TV recently. It has a rather false and amateurish air but was very effective with the public of the day.

The Rockerfellers currently have controlling interests in Exxon (the world’s biggest company) and the Chase Manhattan Bank, which turns over trillions of dollars a week. With so many billions in their hands already, what does more money mean? Obviously it means more power and more control over other human beings, but to what end and in whose name?

Apparently in the name of Lucifer, the fallen angel also known as the bringer of light, hence the name “Illuminati”, which means “the enlightened ones”. Lucifer is also known for the characteristics of pride, deception and impermanence. The illuminati were apparently founded in Bavaria in 1770 by one Adam Weisshaupt, a student of the Jewish philosopher Mendelsohn, and backed by the Rothschild family. The society has always been based on the lodges of Freemasonry, which was taken over at the highest levels during the course of the eighteenth century by agents of the Illuminati. Freemasonry is a very secretive institution, to the extent that members at one level do not know what members at another level are doing. Hence it is an organisation which is full of bonhomie and good deeds at the lower and middle levels, while its motives and deeds at the highest levels veer towards the dark side.

Both Freemasonry and Judaism have strong roots in the ancient Egyptian systems of religious belief, and it was this very similarity which attracted the illuminati to Freemasonry, for most of them were Jewish. It is a source of controversy today to speculate whether or not they are still predominantly Jewish. No unfair racism intended – they either are or they aren’t. Certainly there is much evidence to suggest that they are not, George Bush for instance, a prominent illuminati figure and obviously not Jewish.

The all seeing eye on the U.S. Dollar Bill

The United States of America is more or less a creation of Freemasonry. The symbol of Freemasonry was placed on the cornerstone of the Whitehouse, while the assembled Freemasons lodges stood and watched the ceremony. The famous all-seeing eye in the pyramid appears on the one dollar bill. It is one of the main symbols of Freemasonry. This bill also bears the inscription, in Latin, “1776, the year of inception of a new world order”. If one joins the dots formed by the stars of the thirteen original states one obtains an exact Star of David.

The goal of the IlIuminati is total control of the world. The only nations, which are holding out against their power, are some Islamic nations and China but this resistance is limited because the Illuminati have crushing economic power.

There are certain methods of subjugation and control which are indispensable to this power. The first is, of course, complete control over all financial systems, all borrowing and lending. All banks, all building societies, all insurance companies have to be under their control. At the lowest level even the smallest bank will be forced to toe the line. At the highest level the World Bank decides the fate of countries. It is an interesting and amazing fact that both the Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England are controlled by these Illuminati dynasties, in spite of the names of these banks, which suggest that they are run for public benefit. It is said that both Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy wanted to change this system.

The second essential component is control of the media. It is controlled through business fashion. If the board meeting, or the management meeting, or the sales meeting, or the training meeting suggests that facts should be presented in a certain way, who is going to present them differently? There is an implied threat to one’s job and one’s career. Few people would gladly face demotion, retrenchment or the dole and most people are so ambitious they will do nearly anything “reasonable” to court favour with their superiors. This is how business is controlled and the media is the most important part of business, for it controls people’s minds. People are very suggestible and often lend more credence to what they see on “the box” than to what happens on their own street. The Illuminati know this and use this suggestibility factor to the full. Lenin’s key move during the Russian revolution was the capture of the radio station.

The third factor in the control system is the universities, and through them the whole education system. Particular effort is put into the schools of sociology, politics, economics and education, hence “liberal” systems of education which are often degenerate and even violent. Their men are inserted into the universities through the power of funding by big business. They then spread their influence downwards through tertiary to secondary and primary education.

The fourth factor is the enormous influence wielded by two similar organisations, The Council of Foreign Relations in the USA and the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England. These institutions are schools for statesmen, Illuminati statesmen. They are the stamping grounds of men such as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinksi and Lord Carrington. These two “think tanks” have a crucial influence on all US and British governments, no matter which party is “in power”. The statesmen produced by these institutions can and do decide the fate of nations.The tax-exempt foundations are also instruments of Illuminati power. The Ford foundation and the Rockefeller foundation are two prominent examples of this type of “charitable” institution. They were heavily involved in supporting various communist powers when the cold war was at its height. Communism versus capitalism arms race = more money and power for the Illuminati. So these are some of the structures through which the Illuminati work but what methods do they use?

Pitting one side against the other, using a theory devised by Hegel, which is: Thesis versus antitheses – synthesis.

Every force tends to have an opposite counterforce. The conflict between the two results in a new situation, the synthesis. The illuminati make it their business to be the synthesis. Thus no problem situation is ever “nipped in the bud” it is rather fostered and used, just as the Soviet Union was fostered and used.

The insertion of immigrant groups into countries is a variation of this divide and rule process. Each group can be played off against the other.

“Double talk” and “double think”. George Orwell knew instinctively what was going on when he invented these two expressions:
I categorically deny = it will happen a bit later.
Peace = war by another means.

To say one thing and do another is fundamental to Illuminati practice. They believe that the public will accept these lies through laziness and wishful thinking. Unfortunately they are usually correct.

“Keep them busy busy busy, back on the farm with the other animals.” We are kept so busy with business (or busyness) that we do not understand or participate in the decisions and events that will crucially affect our future.

When a real power move is made it is usually done secretly and suddenly often with the pretence that nothing has happened. There is preparation for opposition, but conflict is often not necessary as most people have been trained to be so passive that they will probably not create an effective opposition.

Use of front men in important positions. These front men have the characteristic of “servile obedience”, probably because of a blot or blots on their character which they are anxious to conceal. Most of the Presidents of the USA fall into this category. The current situation springs to mind. Behind the opponent stands the man with real power, who has long been groomed for this position. Men like Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and George Bush are in this category.

The assassination of opposing leaders as quietly and as secretly as possible, so as to simulate a natural death. If this is not possible due to time constraints or other limited circumstances, surrogates are used and the lines of suspicion are covered by deception, false accusation and if necessary, multiple assassinations. Induced heart attacks, fake motor accidents and apparent suicides are also favoured methods of assassination.

Social engineering. An easily manipulated rabble is what is required. Mixed population groups with weak morals, weak traditions, low educational standards and weak group willpower are the aim. Those with special aptitudes can be taken out and trained to serve the illuminati for technical purposes, security purposes or as part of the propaganda apparatus. The middle class will become surplus to requirements and will be reduced to relative poverty.

Mockery and submission of the manners and morals of societies which show any resistance. Control of the media, the fashion industries and the education systems are essential components in this strategy. “Free love”, the cult of youth, mockery of the Christian and Muslim faiths also fall into this category. “I don’t give a rats ass about Jesus Christ” is one recent masterpiece from one of Hollywood’s biggest starts. He probably didn’t realise what he was saying, which makes him a “useful idiot’. A “useful idiot” is much more effective than a conscious supporter. By these means of subversion societies and nations are conquered from within and open battle is usually not necessary.

The conduct of unrelenting economic warfare. This is the real war and continues even while the bombs are falling and the bullets are flying. The important part is the control of the enemy’s economy after the conflict. The recent economic crash in the far-eastern countries is in reality an assertion of the Illuminati’s economic power, an expression of economic dominance. The Illuminati now control 10-15% of the Japanese economy. This is public knowledge, that is what has been bought at bargain prices. In reality they probably control much more.

Control and exploitation of the standards of public health. The sale of prescription drugs is a huge business generating mega profits. Medical operations and treatments can also be very profitable to big business. These extreme treatments have their place but are over-used for the sake of profit.

In fact big business, particularly the big drug companies, have a vested interest in the ill health of the population. These companies, working through the US Food and Drug Administration, have tried to suppress the health food industry. In this they have largely failed but now the game is to own it and control it so that health foods can only be afforded by the elite.

Argument through defamation of character. The factual debate is ignored while characters are defamed. This is usually a very effective technique as many human beings are very suggestible and seem reluctant to use their reasoning abilities. Thus a “smear campaign” can easily draw attention away from the facts.

To conclude, it is growing increasingly evident that a world government is developing, and many would say that it is probably no bad thing, but few have asked for what purpose this “new world order” is created. Nor have they asked themselves what the consequences will be. These consequences (or some of them) will probably be as follows:

• Increasing profits for big business, increasing poverty for the middle class (who they despise). A rapid decline in moral standards and the promotion of social decay.

• Transience. Jobs that don’t last; neighbourhoods that don’t last.

• Increasing levels of crime and violence.

• Decline and demise of public services; replacement by private enterprise – good service for the few who can afford it.

• Ongoing ill health for the bulk of the population because of stress; poor quality foods; food additives; genetic engineering; pollution and drugs. There may be good health for those who can afford it – only the rich and well informed.

• The gradual phasing out of national governments, which will have powers more like the regional governments of today.

• The formation of several conglomerations like the United States.

In time a world leader will be announced, a real one this time. A pity he will have a cynical contempt for the most of humanity. Do we deserve it?

Nigel Farage: David Cameron ‘directly caused’ Libyan migrant crisis

Matthew Holehouse — Telegraph.co.uk April 19, 2015

Nigel Farage. Click to enlargeNigel Farage has blamed “fanatical” David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy for the drowning of hundreds of migrants off Italy, saying the exodus was “directly caused” by western intervention in the civil war in Libya.

The Ukip leader said that Nato had destabilised Libya when it launched bombing raids against Col Gaddafi in March 2011, causing the flight of refugees from the country.

He said Britain should offer refugee status to some Libyan Christians.

Up to 700 people are feared deadafter a boat carrying migrants capsized off the Libyan coast overnight. Twenty eight people were rescued in the incident, which happened in an area just off Libyan waters, south of the southern Italian island of Lampedusa, an Italian coast guard official said.

If confirmed, it would mean the total dead in the southern Mediterranean is more than 1,500.

Mr Farage rejected calls for a stronger European response to the crisis.

“It was the European response that caused this problem in the first place. The fanaticism of Sarkozy and Cameron to bomb Libya. They have completely destabilised Libya, to turn it into a country with much savagery, to turn it into a place where for Christians the place is now virtually impossible. We ought to be honest and say we have directly caused this problem”.

“There were no migrants coming in these quantities before we bombed the country, got rid of Gaddafi, however bad he might have been, and destabilised the whole situation.”

“I have not got a problem with us offering refugee status to some Christians from those countries.”

British aircraft were part of a Nato mission to bomb Gaddafi regime tanks in support of rebels.

However, since the toppling of Gaddifi Libya has fragmented with two rival governments and a series of armed militias vying for power.

It came as Mr Farage appealed to Labour voters to keep out the SNP.

“My plea from now until polling day is to Labour voters. Having taken part in the TV debates and seen the dynamics between Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon, it’s pretty clear who would wear the trousers. I’m saying to Old Labour, if you are patriotic, if you want a referendum, if you think immigration needs to be controlled, do not vote for Ed Miliband, vote for Ukip.”

He said Mr Miliband had presented a “terrific opportunity” by all but ruling out an in-out referendum on EU membership.

Source

The Mind is the Ugliest Part of the Body

Smoking Mirrors — April 19, 2015

Dog Poet Transmitting……
Woof!
There is so much in the wind. It is as if the voices of many ages were all competing to be heard, at any cost, no matter whom it happens to. There was another reason for coming here but it got lost in translation. It was supposed to provide a quantum leap opportunity and yeah…. it was that but it turned out to be a quantum leap into the darkness in many cases. To each their own, I suppose. The scariest part of it all- could be- that it looks so totally programmed. The movers and shakers are in a tight groove of a downward spiral. It is obviously downward but they are not permitted to see it. The image of water swirling in a toilet bowl comes to mind AND… they want to take the whole world with them went they go. That is how I come to know what kind of a war it is on every front. As you are what you think, so you are what you do; even when what you think you are is a fantasy. It must eventually come up against that which is not. That is the simple reality of an apocalypse and why it is defined through uncovering and revealing.
Simple observation should tell us that doing committing certain acts has consequences. They aren’t always the dramatic consequences of justice seen to be done but… it does get done. We also should know through simple observation that certain other things have entirely different consequences, even thought they sometimes are not seen to be done… they get done. The world is as perfect as the vision of the person observing it and that does not mean that everything is beautiful and everything is fine. It’s not. What it means is that the world is perfectly what it is for the outworking of its set destiny; not entirely set but… what do I know?
Certain things are as predictable as night and day. And it all hinges on a badly drawn picture of dark and hidden items. The promotional aspects of this international blackmail scam are relentless. It’s hard to see the same place in both links. In locations around the world, there is a coming forth of many different views on what we have been told was so. It’s an apocalypse. It’s scary how much certain people have invested in certain things; ‘where your treasures lie’ and all that.
These days I find myself reaching for things to talk about. I don’t see the point in visiting so much similar territory so often. We try to keep it interesting and as combustible as it is, that’s not all that hard but… whatever is going on out there in the world is only relevant to the degree that we engage it on its level. If the world is humming in one complex sequence of vibrations and you are humming along at another, it’s one of those ‘never the twain shall meet’ things. The world has always trended toward corruption. That is the world’s side of the equation. It turns to corruption and out of the compost, new worlds are born and from inception, trend toward the same. It may not seem like that at first. It never does. That is how it sucks so many people along in its wake.
That part of it; getting sucked along in its wake is perfectly understandable. You’ve got these energy centers that vibrate to particular levels of experience. Let’s say each one of these centers is like an entire floor of an immense department store. The elevator door opens and you step out into the near endless display of all the things that apply to that zone. The world comes at us like Noriega or Saddam Hussein getting blasted with rock music. In this case it is your freedom and dignity and its rap, which is only about ten thousands times worse than the worst death metal. They know most people like to dance so they want to control the message and the beat. The message is near completely Satanic across the entire medium. They’re turning up the griddle under a whole bunch of dancing chickens.
I think maybe scary isn’t the exact word I am looking for. Maybe shocking is a better fit. Stunning too. It’s so obviously what it is and people have agreed among themselves not to recognize this because recognizing it makes you liable. What are you liable to? Something other than what you were doing before you recognized it for what it is. You don’t get to go back to sleep. You also discover that there is very little you want to talk about any more except for what’s important. What is important? You would know better than I what is important to you.
It’s also terrifyingly surreal the way that they are savagely acting out on everyone they perceive to be beneath them. It’s coming in on all sides and even that’s not enough. They are making war on the planet itself. No living creature, in anything approaching a sane mind, sets out to destroy themselves. It must be that they cannot see and that it all looks much different to them than it does to us. While they are completely involved in attempting to control our minds, desires and appetites, theirs is being controlled too. It is exactly like a movie with everyone playing a role. The roles they play are not, except coincidentally, the roles or the identities of the actors in ‘real life’. We’re verging toward the metaphorical here. The actors in a film cannot step out of the film or act out of character. It’s on film and the film out here is the Dream Web and… like any web in real life, there is a creature that lives on the web and you are its food. Look at the very aged for result. What percentage of them have their wits intact?
It is not often that you see a serene and gracious elder face. This is far more true in the captured lands than it is in more ancient cultures. When a culture is right, it is timeless. The conditions of the time, the degree of industrialization and technology can have a serious negative impact on a culture but it doesn’t have to… not if the culture is existing along timeless lines. Life doesn’t go wrong around you and then it happens to you. Life goes wrong inside you and then it happens to you. Everything going on in your world only has the degree of fear and uncertainty that you possess yourself. Things are always taken care of unless we start micromanaging from the wracking doubt that things won’t work out. I don’t know what the math is for it or how it looks on a blueprint but I observe this to be so in my own life and the lives of some others who live according to that awareness. As much as you can think things right into existence, you can also think them right out of existence.
So many people run around with this view of a complicated and uncontrollable world, when it is not the outer world giving that impression. It is the inner world acknowledging it. You can look at most everything from radically different perspectives than many, many people do. Take a look around. It’s there in CinemaScope. It’s wrap around wide screen, wall to wall in a round environment of 360 degrees of counterpointing oppositions, conjunctions and all those relationships that are other than your own is. Sometimes you are around like minds and that is one thing. Often you are around unlike minds but the core awareness of all minds exists at a particular resonance and if you can tap into that you can effect synchronicity with many more minds. The bad guys know this too and in times of darkness they have a backstage pass that they don’t have at other times. There’s a date on that backstage pass. It’s time sensitive.
What I am trying to say is that no one has any power over you except what you confer to them from that place in your mind where this allegiance lives. It happens in a lot of subtle ways but it is very real and it puts you inside a particular loop of interplay and relationship that defines what you are when you are not who you are. They get on the job early with television and educational programming and if the religions got a hold on your parents that’s in play too. Once you grow up with a head full of bad information you are thrilled at the idea of putting on a uniform and going to places where you can kill the inhabitants because the banks ordered the people that give the orders to the people who give you your orders.
Everything begins and ends in your mind. Everything that affects you affects you because of the state of your mind. Everything appears to you the way it does because of the state of your mind. Everything you see came out of your mind, given that you have identified it as what it is in your mind. The simple reality is that we have created our own world and we can also change it at any time. Change is swift on some levels and then it moves more slowly, like in the physical realm; but everything is changed from the same location and the key is to stand guard at the gateway of the mind. Hard at first and habit later. Hard at first and habit later.
End Transmission…….
There will be a radio broadcast Sunday evening.

 

Source

Lindsey Graham: there’s a ‘snowball’s chance in hell’ for congressional OK of Iran nuke deal

Adam Edelman — New York Daily News April 19, 2015

Sen. Lindsey GrahamA prominent Senate Republican said Sunday there’s not a “snowball’s chance in hell” that President Obama’s Iran nuclear deal would get congressional approval.

“It is so weak in a time we need to be strong,” South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a possible 2016 contender, said on Fox News Sunday of the draft agreement between the U.S., Iran and other world powers over Tehran’s nuclear program.

“I don’t think there’s a snowball’s chance in hell this framework will get approved by Congress after review,” he added. “I don’t think any Republican or Democrat is going to allow that to become final.”

New York Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer, on the other hand, maintained that he was “withholding judgment” on the draft agreement until he receives more information.

Asked about his position Sunday, Schumer said: “I’m in the process of being briefed. It’s a very difficult situation. It’s a situation that requires a lot of care and I’m withholding judgment until I learn both sides very carefully.

“There are a whole lot of things we don’t know yet. When do sanctions go into effect? How rigid is the inspections regime? What will be done on the military bases? So I think it’s premature to give an answer one way or the other right now,” he said.

International negotiators have been working to reach a deal that would prevent Iran from being able to develop nuclear weapons. In exchange, Tehran would get relief from economic sanctions that are crippling its economy.

Congress has pushed for weeks for the ability to approve any final deal reached with Iran and last week, President Obama assured lawmakers that he would sign a bill that would give legislators a chance to block an international agreement to rein in Iran’s nuclear program.

But, in another sign any final deal faces an uphill battle, a senior commander in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said Sunday that inspectors would be barred from military sites under any nuclear agreement with world powers — setting up a possible standoff.

Gen. Hossein Salami, the Guard’s deputy leader, told Iranian state television that allowing foreign inspection of military sites would be tantamount to “selling out,” raising the stakes as talks between Iran and the six-nation group are to resume April 22 in Vienna.

“We will respond with hot lead (bullets) to those who speak of it,” Salami said. “Iran will not become a paradise for spies. We will not roll out the red carpet for the enemy.”

In addition, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told military commanders Sunday that U.S. negotiators had created the “myth” of nuclear weapons to portray Iran as a threat, hardening his rhetoric before nuclear negotiations resume this week.

“They created the myth of nuclear weapons so they could say the Islamic Republic is a source of threat,” Khamenei, the highest authority in Iran, said in a televised address to a hall of several hundred military commanders. “The source of threat is America itself, with its unrestrained, destabilizing interventions.”

Source

“Battle of Lexington” (1775) — America’s First False Flag?

henrymakow.com — April 19, 2015

1775 depictions show Americans being slaughtered. No one is even firing back. Click to enlarge

1775 depictions show Americans being slaughtered. No one is even firing back. Click to enlarge

Today is the 240th Anniversary of The “Battle of Lexington.”
The “Battle of Lexington,” 1775, was portrayed as an unprovoked slaughter of colonists by the British. James Perloff believes that, like the sinking of the USS Maine and 9-11, the event was engineered to start a war, the American Revolution.
Freemasons have manipulated Americans into fighting wars from the get-go. America was founded as a Masonic nation, what Francis Bacon called “the new Atlantis” when he supported the original Jamestown colony.

by James Perloff

I grew up in Lexington, Massachusetts, where on April 19, 1775, a force of British redcoats, on their way to Concord to confiscate rebel munitions, encountered a small force of militiamen. Suddenly, “the shot heard round the world” was fired. In the ensuing skirmish, eight colonists were killed, and nine wounded. The British suffered one wounded. This was a causus bellum for the American Revolution.
But, was “the shot heard round the world” a false flag like 9-11, a pretext for war?
As explained in detail my online article The Secrets Buried at Lexington Green, Americans were deceived. It was proclaimed everywhere that the British had committed an unprovoked massacre in Lexington. The truth is individuals in concealed locations fired on the British first.
Though most Americans today recognize him only as a face on beer bottles, the revolution’s mastermind in Massachusetts was Sam Adams, whom biographer John Miller called the “pioneer in propaganda.”
Adams, Temporary Secretary of the 1774 Philadelphia Congress, had secured a pledge from delegates that, should warfare erupt between Massachusetts and British troops, the other colonies would aid Massachusetts. But this carried a stipulation: They would only help IF THE BRITISH FIRED FIRST.
By mid-April 1775 the SECOND Continental Congress was 3 weeks away. Sam Adams desperately needed a “British fired first” incident to bring to the Congress, lest passions for revolution and war wane.
Here is a HIGHLY condensed summary of my article.

Continues …

I wasn’t shown fresh evidence of Lord Janner’s alleged abuse of children, says former DPP

Neil Sears, Chris Dougherty and Chris Pleasance — Mail Online April 18, 2015

Lord Greville Janner. Click to enlarge

Lord Greville Janner. Click to enlarge

A former Director of Public Prosecutions has said lawyers involved in the decision not to charge Lord Janner with child abuse in 2007 failed to pass new evidence to him.

Lord Macdonald QC, who was DPP between 2003 and 2008, said that instead of consulting with headquarters in London, CPS lawyers in Leicestershire decided fresh evidence against Janner was not worth pursuing through the courts.

That decision meant Janner, now 86, was able to escape prosecution for eight years until the CPS controversially announced earlier this week that he is now unfit to stand trial due to Alzheimer’s.

Speaking to The Guardian, Lord Macdonald said: ‘It is a matter of great regret that I was never informed of the existence of this case in 2007.

‘If it had been referred to me, I would certainly have given it my close and robust personal attention.

‘The grave failure on the part of the local CPS lawyers to refer this case to headquarters is no doubt one of the matters that (High Court judge) Sir Richard Henriques will be looking at in his review of these cases.’

Alison Millar, head of the abuse team at law firm Leigh Day, who represented an alleged victim of Lord Janner, said: ‘The main option now for those who allege they were abused by Lord Janner, to ensure their claims are investigated and for their voice to be heard, is through a civil legal claim.

‘We are currently investigating the feasibility of such a legal challenge.’

The news comes after it was revealed last night that Westminster attendance records show Janner attended the House of Lords almost daily and claimed more than £100,000 in expenses in the four years after he was diagnosed with the disease.

He only stopped attending Parliament – and claiming up to £300 a day for doing so – when child abuse police raided his house on December 2013. Even in that month he attended the Lords 12 times.

Lord Janner is said by his alleged victims to have preyed on young boys at care homes near his Leicester West constituency.

On Thursday Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said the peer would not be prosecuted because his condition means there could be no criminal conviction.

She said there was evidence to charge Janner with 22 sexual offences against children carried out between 1969 and 1988, and that he should have been prosecuted in 1991, when Janner’s name was raised in a major paedophile trial, and again in 2007

She went on to say that ‘mistakes were made’, and commissioned retired High Court judge, Sir Richard Henriques, to launch an inquiry.

But her ruling means nine alleged victims will never have the chance to have their claims tested in court.

And analysis of records shows Janner continued speaking fluently for years after his diagnosis and was also alert enough to claim expenses among the highest in the Lords

In the 12 months up to April 2009, the year of his diagnosis, he attended the Lords 143 times – only just shy of the 147 maximum possible. And he managed to fill in forms procuring himself £12,075 in subsistence payments and £13,468 in ‘office costs’ – with another £691 in mileage claims for his car.

In the following year, up to April 2010, he attended 136 days at the Lords out of a maximum 142 and claimed £10,986 subsistence, £11,625 office costs and £589 mileage.

In the year to April 2011 he turned up 126 days out of 137, and claimed expenses totalling £34,014. In the year to April 2012, Janner attended 143 days out of a maximum of 156. He also managed to claim a hefty £28,800 in expenses.

In the following year, up to April 2013, he turned up 136 days out of 144, and claimed expenses totalling £24,600.

In April, May and June 2013 he attended every one of the 30 days the Lords sat, claiming a total of £6,450 in expenses. In July he was absent just one out of 20 days, claiming £2,850 for the remaining 19.

And in August, September, October and November, he did not miss a single sitting out of 32 days, and claimed £4,800 in expenses.

Yesterday David Cameron said: ‘I have enormous sympathy for anyone who has been the victim of crime or sexual abuse.

‘But it is a very important principle that decisions about prosecutions are taken by independent authorities and we have to be very careful not to step over the line, however frustrating it may sometimes feel that people aren’t getting the justice that they deserve.

Source

‘War criminal’ in nursing home

Guido Fawkes — April 16, 2015

Lord Janner chaired the Holocaust educational Trust and was Vice President of the World Jewish Congress. Click to enlarge

Lord Janner chaired the Holocaust educational Trust and was Vice President of the World Jewish Congress. Click to enlarge

Back in 1999, the BBC reported on the discovery that Konrad Kalejs, an alleged Nazi war criminal, was living in a nursing home in Leicestershire:
“Former Labour MP Lord Janner, chairman of the Holocaust Educational Trust, said he would ask Home Secretary Jack Straw to investigate the allegations against Mr Kalejs. And he said that if there was sufficient evidence, Mr Kalejs should be prosecuted under war crimes legislation. If there was not enough evidence for a prosecution, the government should follow the example of the United States and Canada and deport him, he said.
“They only do that if they are sufficiently satisfied that a person is guilty of war crimes. They don’t want him in their country. If that is correct, we don’t want him in our country either,” Lord Janner told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.”
So Janner says you can prosecute of deport elderly wrong ‘uns, but not investigate the claims of his paedophilia because his memory is a bit hazy…

Source

Footnote — April 19, 2015

1991 newspaper report on Frank Beck's trial. Click to enlarge

1991 newspaper report on Frank Beck’s trial. Click to enlarge

Talk about the workings of Karma! 16 years-ago Lord Janner was advocating the prosecution of an elderly care home resident for alleged War Crimes committed during WWII.
If there was insufficient evidence for prosecution, Janner had recommended deportation instead.
Now that the boot is on the other foot, so to speak, we think that the same rule should be applied. Both paedophiles and War Criminals alike should be called to account.
Although in Janner’s case there is plenty of evidence and numerous victims and witnesses willing to testify. So deportation isn’t an option.
Instead, rather than avoiding prosecution because of alleged ‘dementia’, the former Head of the Jewish Board of Deputies should just be charged and exposed for what he is: a sick sodomite and rapist of young boys. Ed.

Greville Janner affair: Children’s homes inquiry evidence ‘must be released’

Daniel Boffey — The Guardian April 18, 2015

All the evidence given to a 1993 inquiry into sexual abuse at a children’s home to which Greville Janner – now Lord Janner – has been linked should be made public, survivors of child abuse have demanded.

The proceedings of the Kirkwood inquiry, which examined child abuse in children’s homes in Leicestershire in the 1970s and 1980s, were kept secret to avoid the naming of innocent third parties. It followed the trial of Frank Beck, a serial abuser who ran children’s homes in Leicestershire, during which Janner was accused by a witness of abusing him when he was 13 and 14.

A report by Andrew Kirkwood QC, which was made public, did not mention Janner and the evidence has remained inaccessible to the public. Janner was questioned by police after the trial but made no comment and was released without charge.

When Janner, then MP for Leicester West, returned to the Commons after the trial he received a rousing reception. Keith Vaz, the Labour MP who chairs the home affairs select committee, was one of 16 MPs who publicly defended him.

Janner, 86, has been investigated by police in recent months but last week the CPS announced that it would not be prosecuting him because he is suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, despite evidence warranting a criminal trial over 22 sex offences.

Peter McKelvie, a former child protection manager whose allegations about historical child sex abuse by a powerful Westminster ring led to the police investigations, said the failure of the Kirkwood inquiry to make evidence public could only have hindered efforts to prosecute Janner. He also urged Vaz to explain his actions. The usually vociferous MP has failed to make any comment and did not respond to inquiries from this newspaper last night.

McKelvie said: “For all the incredibly brave survivors who have come forward with regard to Janner, they deserve at the very least an explanation as to why the Kirkwood inquiry wasn’t made public and they certainly deserve the right to know everything that was heard behind closed doors then. The whole of parliament needs to make a public apology for the standing ovation given to Janner.”

Janner was investigated by three different police inquiries between 1991 and 2007, but none ended in prosecution.

Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions, blamed failings within her department and the police for the collapse of previous inquiries. Police said her decision not to prosecute was perverse and are threatening legal action to overturn it.

, Theresa May, the home secretary, said in a radio interview: “I was very concerned when I heard about this decision. It is not my decision, it is entirely a decision for the director of public prosecutions.”

 

Source

Iran leader urges military to increase ‘preparedness’

AFP — April 19, 2015

Ayatollah Ali KhamIran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei urged his armed forces Sunday to increase their “defensive preparedness”, denouncing a US warning that military action is an option if there is no nuclear deal.

In a speech to commanders and troops, the supreme leader said “the other side with insolence threaten us all the time”, denying Iran was seeking an atomic bomb and insisting its military doctrine is defensive.

Khamenei’s remarks came after General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, reiterated last week that should nuclear talks with Iran fail “the military option… is intact”.

The United States has long said bombing Iran’s nuclear sites and other key facilities may be necessary if Tehran does not rein in its atomic activities.

Khamenei did not name Dempsey, but said: “After a period of silence by the other side, one of its officials has once again recently talked of options on the table.

“On the one hand they bluff, and on the other hand they say the Islamic Republic of Iran should halt its defensive advancements, which is a stupid remark.

“Iran will never accept such stupid remarks and the nation has proved that if it is attacked, it will defend itself quite powerfully. It will stand united and like a strong fist against illogical aggressors.”

Iran and six world powers led by Washington agreed on April 2 on the key parameters of a nuclear agreement that could end the 12-year standoff over Tehran’s atomic programme.

A comprehensive agreement is due by June 30 but Khamenei has stressed that concrete details, including how to lift sanctions, have not yet been decided.

“All bodies from the ministry of defence to the army and the Sepah (Revolutionary Guards) should increase their military and defensive preparedness. This should be regarded as an official directive,” he said.

Russia, one power in the nuclear talks, last week lifted a ban on the sale of its S-300 missile systems to Iran, a move condemned by Israel which vehemently and frequently warns of a bad nuclear deal.

- Iran ‘no threat’ to region -

Russia said progress in the talks meant there was no longer a need for it to prohibit export of the S-300 surface-to-air missiles.

Iran, which hailed Russia’s move as a step toward “lasting security” in the region, currently lacks advanced air defences that could knock out modern fighter aircraft in the US or Israeli air forces.

Opponents of a nuclear deal, including Gulf states, fear that Iran — fuelled by money released if sanctions are lifted — could be emboldened into furthering its regional aims.

Iran, the main Shiite power, is a key player in several conflicts, backing President Bashar al-Assad against rebels in Syria and supporting Iraq’s government against the Islamic State group.

It has also been accused of backing Shiite Huthi rebels who have seized control of large parts of Yemen, prompting a Saudi-led air war in support of the country’s embattled government.

But Khamenei said Iran was not meddling nor a danger to the Middle East, instead taking aim at the United States, other Western powers and Israel for creating conflict.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran, despite upgrading its defensive and military capabilities, shall never be a threat to regional and neighbouring countries,” he said.

“Americans as well as Europeans and some other sycophants have made up the myth of the nuclear issue and nuclear weapons to say the Islamic Republic is a threat.

“Today the biggest threats for the region and the world are America and the Zionist regime who… interfere in any place they deem it necessary and launch massacres.”

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has also criticised US warnings by Dempsey and other officials such as Pentagon chief Ashton Carter, dismissing them Saturday as “an old habit that dies hard”.

“The fact we are negotiating indicates that everybody understands the only way to deal with Iran is to recognise Iran’s rights and have mutual respect,” he said. “That will provide a far better answer than getting engaged in disastrous adventurism.”

Source

Barak urges Netanyahu: ‘Daring action needed against Iran, not just words’

Jerusalem Post — April 19, 2015

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Ehud Barak. Click to enlarge

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Ehud Barak.

In a column written for Time magazine’s annual 100 most influential people in the world, former Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered his thoughts on Israel’s current leader Benjamin Netanyahu, whom he describes as ” determined, effective and focused… but over time” has learned to equivocate on the most pressing issues facing the Jewish State.   

“I knew Bibi, decades ago, as a soldier and young officer under my command facing real fire. He was determined, effective and focused. Character does not change. Chickensh-t he is not,” wrote Barak. “But over time, while thoughtful and an avid reader of history, he developed a mind-set at once pessimistic, passive and anxious. Benjamin Netanyahu seems to avoid any initiative. Some say it’s all about surviving in power. I think he is more complex and nuanced.”

Barak went on to write that Netanyahu has failed to engage in Israel’s most urgent matters, especially “on the Palestinian question” in which “he grossly ignores the slippery slope awaiting Israel in the form of a one-state solution.”

Barack closed his short biographical accompaniment to the article by touching on the Iranian nuclear issue, agreeing with Netanyahu’s assessment that the Islamic Republic is a serious threat to existence of Israel, and urges him to take bolder action.

“To leave his mark Netanyahu must swiftly heal wounds opened by his campaign, mend the working relationship with President Obama, fight hard—mainly behind closed doors—for a tougher policy, and even, if needed, an attack against Iran and boldly engage the region’s moderates against terror, radicalism and Iranian hegemony. Daring actions are needed. Not just words.”

The ‘Time 100′ is an annual issue that lists the most influential figures in the world. They usually consist of leaders, cultural icons, scientists and array of other figures who impact the world around us.

Source

Is Justin Trudeau a Product of Illuminati Mind Control?

henrymakow.com — April 18, 2015

Justin TrudeauJustin Trudeau, the leader of the Liberal party of Canada, could become Prime Minister after the next general election in October. Our political leaders all belong to the Illuminati satanic cult that sexually exploit and trauma brainwash their children.
At his father’s funeral, Justin Trudeau seems to allude to MK-Ultra pedophilia and mind control in his eulogy.

COMMON GROUND by Justin Trudeau — Reviewed by Ann Diamond (henrymakow.com)

Justin Trudeau’s autobiography “Common Ground” was not easy to review. Its unspoken subtext involves abuse due to the Illuminati/Luciferian background of both sides of his family.
In her book TRANCE-FORMATION OF AMERICA MK-ULTRA survivor Cathy O’Brien stated that many world leaders, including Pierre Trudeau and Brian Mulroney, are pedophiles. She met them in the course of her life as a sex slave trained (with her young daughter) to service high-profile politicians. Other sources support Cathy O’Brien’s allegations.
Over the years, insiders have told me that Pierre’s 1968 marriage to Margaret was “arranged” by the military. The couple programmed with LSD at a remote farm in British Columbia.
According to Trudeau’s Jesuit mentor, Trudeau ordered the kidnap and murder of his enemy Pierre Laporte in October 1970, because Laporte was threatening him with blackmail and exposure as a pedophile.
After Margaret ran off with the Rolling Stones in 1977, the marriage was over. Soon after, as a single father, Pierre turned to a York University sociologist, John Seeley, for parental advice.
John Seeley, a self-proclaimed ‘sadist and pedophile’ would fly up to Ottawa on weekends to “advise” Pierre on how he should be raising his three sons. Justin was six. (See also this article.)
Quite a childhood. First the trauma of being separated from the mother he adored, then frequent exposure to his father’s unsavory friends.

Children often idealize their abusive parents. During his eulogy at Pierre’s funeral, a smiling 28-year-old Justin seemed dissociated, almost giddy. He began the eulogy with a weird story about a trip he took at age six, with his father and grandfather “to the North Pole,” to a “military installation” at Alert NWT.
There the awe-struck boy discovered Santa Claus and “that’s when I understood just how powerful and wonderful my father was.”
Carolyn Hamlett, a victim of Illuminati mind control and pedophilia, said these abuses took place at military installations.
Is Justin referring to MK-Ultra brainwashing? In general, the eulogy rings insincere and hollow. There is no trace of love or grief. His father had little time for his children.
A few years ago, I was shown a 1984 letter signed by Pierre Elliot Trudeau expressing enthusiastic interest in meeting a ten-year-old boy. The letter may have been used in a blackmail attempt by the boy’s father.
If Pierre Trudeau was abusing their children, Margaret’s history of bipolar illness takes on a whole different cast.

POIGNANT PR

Continues …

700 migrants feared dead in Mediterranean shipwreck

AFP — April 19, 2015

Up to 700 people are feared to have drowned when a fishing boat capsized off Libya, in what could prove to be the worst disaster yet involving migrants being smuggled to Europe across the Mediterranean.

Only 28 people survived the capsize, UNHCR spokeswoman Carlotta Sami told the Skytg24 news channel in Italy on Sunday. The survivors indicated there had been more than 700 on board, she said.

The Maltese navy put the number on board at about 650 and said an alert had come in about midnight local time on Saturday.

“We have deployed our assets along with others from Italy and we are assisting in the rescue operation,” a Maltese navy spokesman told AFP on Sunday without giving any other details.

If confirmed, the tragedy would be by far the biggest in a growing catalogue of mass drownings of migrants attempting to reach the European Union on overcrowded, unseaworthy boats run by people smugglers.

The boat went down about 60 miles (96km) off the Libyan coast and 120 miles (193km) south of the Italian island of Lampedusa.

The disaster comes after a week in which two other shipwrecks left an estimated 450 people dead. More than 11,000 other would-be immigrants to Europe have been rescued by Italy’s coastguard and other boats. About 1,500 migrants have now drowned in the waters between Libya and Italy since the start of the year.

Aid organisations have called for a concerted international effort to put better search-and-rescue systems in place and for action to stem the unprecedented numbers of asylum seekers and migrants from Asia, the Middle East and Africa seeking to reach Europe.

Source

Rouhani says Iran’s military strategy purely defensive

Introduction — April 19, 2015

Apart from announcing that it was fielding the long-awaited Bavar 373, an advanced air defence system that Iran claims is as capable as Russia’s S-300, Iran’s recent announcements concerning its military have notably low key. As if it were now playing its cards close to its chest, so as not reveal too much.
This is in contrast to years previously when, although not exactly boastful, pronouncements regarding its military were more forthright. When defiance in the face of sanctions and Western hostility seemed the order of the day.
If the intention had been to deter Western military action against the Islamic Republic, it worked. The much anticipated military strikes against its nuclear facilities have yet to materialise.
This new low key approach may have been adopted so as not to cause alarm while nuclear negotiations have yet to be finalised. But Iran’s new found caginess may also be to conceal its growing military capability from potential adversaries.
So although Tehran’s annual Army Day parade took place as usual yesterday the Bavar 373 seemed notable for its low key debut. The Sayyad-3 missiles, which are part of the Bavar 373 system, were displayed although could have easily missed them. They are not shown in the footage below. Ed.

AFP — April 19, 2015

Iranian armed drone on display during a parade in Tehran.

Iranian armed drone on display during a parade in Tehran.

Iran’s military is purely for defence and should not be seen as a threat in the Middle East, President Hassan Rouhani said Saturday amid rising tension with Saudi Arabia.

With a Saudi-led air campaign against Huthi rebels in Yemen putting Tehran, the region’s dominant Shiite power, at odds with its Sunni rival Riyadh, Russia this week moved to supply missiles to Iran.

Saudi Arabia accuses Iran of arming the Huthis, Yemen’s Zaidi Shiite minority which has long complained of marginalisation and has fought several conflicts with central authorities.

The arms allegation is denied by Iran, which has presented a four-point peace plan for Yemen to UN chief Ban Ki-moon, demanding international action to end the “senseless” Saudi-led air strikes.

Rouhani, whose comments came after renewed intense bombing hit Yemen and Al-Qaeda seized more ground in the chaos, said the Islamic republic’s military policies are wrongly perceived.

“Our strategy has always been that of a deterrent… not a doctrine of war,” he said in a speech at an annual Army Day ceremony in the capital where a new Iranian-made Bavar-373 missile was paraded.

The presence of Iranian navy ships “in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Aden is intended to ensure the security of neighbouring countries and maritime traffic,” he said.

“The armed forces bring peace to the nation and other peoples of the region,” he added.

Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier this week removed the ban on supplying Iran with a more sophisticated S-300 air defence missile system, paving the way to conclude a long-delayed contract.

The move raised alarm that such sales could embolden Tehran in talks with leading world powers about curbing its long-disputed nuclear programme.

However, Iran says the domestically produced Bavar-373 system has similar capabilities to the S-300.

US President Barack Obama on Friday said he was not shocked that Russia had lifted its restrictions.

“This is a sale that was slated to happen in 2009, when I first met with then-prime minister Putin. They actually stopped the sale, paused or suspended the sale, at our request,” Obama added.

“And I’m frankly surprised that it held this long, given that they were not prohibited by sanctions from selling these defensive weapons.”

Source

Indigenous Bavar-373 goes operational

Mehr News — April 18, 2015

The Zoljanah heavy duty military truck thought to be designed to carry the Bavar 373 air defence system. Click to enlarge

The Zoljanah heavy duty military truck thought to be designed to carry the Bavar 373 air defence system. Click to enlarge

Iran’s Army executive deputy has announced on Saturday that domestically-manufactured Bavar-373 missile defense system similar to the Russian S-300 has become fully operational across the country.

Prototype Sayyad 3 Launcher during tests in 2011. Click to enlarge

Prototype Sayyad 3 Launcher during tests in 2011. Click to enlarge

Bavar-373 indigenous missile defense system and Sayyad-3 (Hunter III) missile have been unveiled for the first time on the National Day of Army and with the attendance of President Rouhani.

Brigadier General Mohammad Mahmoudi noted today’s marches were a part of Iranian army’s prowess.

Concurrent with the army’s marches, Iran’s navy fleet staged parades on Makran coastal strip along the coast of the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.

Commander of Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Air Defense Base Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili had previously said in August Bavar-373 fired its first successful shot.

Bavar-373 is an indigenous long-range air defense system developed as an alternative to the Russian S-300 after Moscow canceled its contract in 2010.

According to Iranian security officials, the new system is better than the Russian S-300, as it is able to track over 100 targets, just like the Russian system but with a higher targeting capability.

MS
MNA
Source

Latest Islamic State Video

News Commentary — April 18, 2015

A regular correspondent has sent in what purports to be the latest Islamic State video. He writes:
Some sophisticated image manipulation here re Washington Monument, White House and other things.
Infowars (suspect outfit) reporter, Joe Biggs, part of film.
Looks like real beheadings at end of film but expressions on faces of victims and the unchanging state of those expressions as neck is deeply severed indicates these images fake too. I think if someone was chopping my head off I might start to look a bit distressed.
What do you think (if you can bring yourself to watch it)?
Apart from the fact that those about to be beheaded seem remarkably calm and compliant, this latest video seems like a slickly produced video presentation. So much so indeed that one wonders if it is not the work of Western propagandists trying to dispel growing doubts about the authenticity of the original beheading videos?
Now we are shown graphic close-ups of flowing red liquid, which are supposed to be blood, or so we assume.
This is in distinct contrast to the earlier video beheadings where there were no such close-ups. As if professional propagandists and manipulators of intelligence had been called in to staunch mounting questions about the video beheadings and who is really behind Islamic State?

The “Possible Military Dimensions” Bomb That Could Blow Up the Iran Deal

Gareth Porter — Truthout April 17, 2015

The entrance of a nuclear reactor in Bushehr, Iran. Click to enlarge

The entrance of a nuclear reactor in Bushehr, Iran. Click to enlarge

The United States and Iran may have agreed on a vague framework for resolving remaining issues between them, including the lifting of sanctions, but the final stage of the negotiations will bring a diplomatic confrontation over the sequence and timing of lifting sanctions.

And the most difficult issue in the coming talks will be how the “Possible Military Dimensions” or “PMD” – the allegations of Iranian nuclear weapons work that have been at the center of the entire Iran nuclear crisis for several years – is to be linked to lifting certain UN Security Council sanctions.

On that linkage Iran will insist that its cooperation in providing access to the International Atomic Energy Agency must be reciprocated with the lifting of certain sanctions on an agreed-upon timetable, regardless of how long the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) takes to make up its mind and what judgment it renders, according to a source in close contact with the Iranian negotiating team.

The US “fact sheet” on the “parameters” of an agreement says, “All past United Nations Security Council resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue will be lifted simultaneously with the completion by Iran of nuclear related activities addressing all key concerns,” and the list that follows includes “PMD.”

However, nothing was officially agreed on in Lausanne on how Iranian cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on the PMD issue would be linked to sanctions relief, according to the source close to the Iranian negotiators. But the source said that an informal understanding was reached that the linkage would involve the lifting of UN Security Council sanctions directly involving Iran’s imports for its nuclear and missile programs.

Iran is prepared to cooperate to complete the IAEA investigation of past allegations, the source said, but will demand concrete limits that provide assurances that the process will not be prolonged indefinitely.

Iran continues to insist that the evidence being used to impugn its intentions was “manufactured.” Nevertheless, Iran “would be ready to give access to the IAEA on PMD even though that goes beyond NPT [Nonproliferation Treaty],” the source told Truthout.

But the source said Iran would not agree to make the lifting of those UN sanctions contingent on any IAEA judgment about the PMD issue. Instead, Iran will demand a list in advance of everything the IAEA wants. “We would give the IAEA access to everything on the list,” said the source.

Once the IAEA completed its visits and its environmental sampling, however, Iran will consider that the process is finished. “We don’t care what the IAEA analysis would be or how long it took,” the source said. “What Iranians cannot accept is that [the PMD issue] becomes an indefinite instrument for theIsraelis, because they want to find out about Iranian capability and ask for this or that military site and a new inspection.”

The negotiations on the PMD-sanctions linkage will be part of a broader set of negotiations in which Iran will insist on a detailed set of arrangements on sanctions relief in return for each of its concessions in the agreement, according to the source. “Each of the elements listed in the US fact sheet must have a step-by-step plan with a timetable and proportionate reciprocation,” said the source.

Obama Under Pressure He Helped Create

The Obama administration has been under heavy pressure from the Israelis and their supporters in Washington to insist that Iran confess to having carried out nuclear weapons research and development as a condition for sanctions relief.

That pressure is the result of several years of news media coverage that has treated allegations that Iran carried out research and development on nuclear weapons, published by the IAEA in 2011, as established fact. The media have constantly repeated the theme that Iran has been “stonewalling” the IAEA to cover up its past nuclear weapons experiments.

Absent from the media narrative is the fact that the allegations that the IAEA is demanding that Iran explain are all based on intelligence that is now known to have come from Israel and which the IAEA itself suspected of being fabricated, from 2005 to 2009.

But the Obama administration itself helped to make PMD a hot button issue in American politics. It made Iran’s alleged refusal to cooperate with the IAEA investigation of the purported intelligence alleging an Iranian nuclear weapons research and development program the rationale for imposing punishing sanctions on Iran.

The administration has been wary of demanding an actual admission of guilt, which it knew was unrealistic, but it has been unwilling to completely dismiss the position of the Israelis and their followers either. Last November a “senior Western official” told Reuters that the United States and the other five powers would try to “be creative” in finding a formula to satisfy both those who were insisting that Iran must “come clean” about its nuclear past and those who said it was not realistic to expect a confession.

In an April 8 interview with Secretary of State John Kerry, the host of “PBS NewsHour” Judy Woodruff asserted that the IAEA wanted Iran to “disclose past military-related activities” but that Iran was “increasingly looking like it’s not going to do this.” Woodruff then asked, “Is the US prepared to accept that?”

Without challenging the premise that Iran is expected to “disclose past military activities,” Kerry responded, “No. They have to do it. It will be done.”

Fabricated Intelligence and IAEA Investigation

The George W. Bush administration pressed documents supposedly from the laptop computer of an Iran scientist involved in an Iranian nuclear weapons research program on the IAEA in mid-2005. But Mohamed ElBaradei, then IAEA director general, refused to regard the documents as legitimate evidence because they had never been authenticated, and Bush administration officials refused to answer questions about their origins. In his memoirs published in 2011, ElBaradei writes, “The problem was, no one knew if any of this was real.

Information now available shows that the documents were created in Israel. According to a senior German office official, those documents were given to Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the BND, in 2004 by the Mujahedin e-Khalq (MEK), the armed exile Iranian opposition group that had been an Israeli client organization for several years.

A popular Israeli history of the most successful covert operations by Israel’s Mossad, originally published in Hebrew in Israel, asserts that Mossad provided some of the documents to the MEK that later become the centerpiece of the case against Iran.

ElBaradei also reveals in his memoirs that the IAEA received another series of purported Iranian documents directly from Israel in summer 2009. Among them was a two-page document in Farsi describing a four-year program to produce a neutron initiator for a fission chain reaction. The former IAEA chief inspector in Iraq, Robert Kelley has recalled that ElBaradei found that document to be lacking credibility because it had no chain of custody, no identifiable source, and no official markings or anything else that could establish its authenticity. But ElBaradei’s successor as IAEA director general, Japanese diplomat Yukiya Amano, gave the IAEA’s imprimatur to the entire collection as well as the earlier set of documents in an annex to the November 2011 report. After his election, Amano assured US officials that he was “solidly in the US court” in his handling of the Iran file.

The IAEA has never revealed that Israel was the source of the latter set of documents. The IAEA justified its decision to keep the identity of the member states that provided intelligence secret by citing the alleged necessity to protect “sources and methods.” The decision to maintain silence on the source has served to shield both Israel and the IAEA itself from questions about the obvious political motives behind the purported intelligence.

The other major purported intelligence find published by the IAEA was the claim from Israel that Iran had installed a large steel explosives containment cylinder at its military base in Parchin in 2000 for nuclear weapons-related testing. But no corroborating evidence has ever been produced, and Robert Kelley has challenged the IAEA’s adoption of the Israeli intelligence claim on the grounds it was technically implausible.

Relations between Iran and the IAEA on cooperation over the PMD issue have gone through three major phases. In a series of meetings in early 2012, Iran and the IAEA were close to reaching agreement on a framework for Iranian cooperation. Iran agreed on an IAEA visit to Parchin, where the bomb test cylinder was said to have been located, as part of the process. But the talks broke down over the IAEA’s insistence that the investigation would never have an end point, and that the Agency would have the right to return to any question or site, even after Iran had provided the necessary access and other cooperation.

A second phase of relations began when Iran and the IAEA reached agreement on a “Framework for Cooperation” in February 2014. Iran agreed to provide information and access in regard to a list of PMD issues, starting with the “Exploding Bridgewire” (EBW) issue.

But after Iran provided documentary evidence to show that its research in the field was for its oil and gas industry and not for nuclear weapons, Amano refused to acknowledge publicly that Iran had discredited one of the arguments about the intelligence documents.

The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Ali Akhbar Salehi, claimed that the IAEA had promised in the agreement to close issues once Iran had provided required information, and the IAEA did not challenge his claim. Amano insisted, however, that the IAEA would not issue any assessment until it had completed its investigation of all of the issues.

Iran apparently concluded from that experience that the IAEA would keep Iran on the hook as long as the United States and its allies wanted to maintain leverage over Iran. The Obama administration has now confirmed that conclusion by holding the lifting of sanctions hostage to Iran’s “cooperation” on PMD.

US officials have never explained how they would expect Iran to satisfy the IAEA if the intelligence at issue was indeed fabricated.

 

Source

TSA ridiculously instructs Disneyland employees to flag “excessive laughter” or “wearing a disguise” as signs of terrorism

Mike Adams — Natural News April 17, 2015

Secret Surveillance. Click to enlargeAmerica’s agency of federally-approved airport perverts, itchy-finger crotch-grabbers and power trip egomaniacs now has a whole new job: brainwashing the minds of Disneyland employees with its quack science “behavior detection program” to spot terrorists.

“Yes, the Transportation Security Administration’s embattled $900 million behavior detection program, called Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques, or SPOT, is not just used at airports. It’s also used at theme parks,” writes Jana Winter of The Intercept.

“They have plainclothes people at SeaWorld and Disney doing the same behavior detection, looking for the same indicators we look for at the airport,” a source told The Intercept.

No doubt the TSA also trained Tilikum the killer whale to spot terrorists, too. That’s what happened, actually: one day the trainer laughed a little too loud and the killer whale ATE HIM.

Excessive laughter and wearing a disguise are both “suspicious behaviors” at Disney theme parks

The TSA — which stands for Transportation Security Agency — is supposed to only be concerned with transportation security, not theme park security. Somehow, the TSA has convinced itself that Disneyland’s rides qualify as “transportation.” (After all, in the Small World ride, you’re in a boat, right?) So it has begun teaching Disney’s security employees how to identify so-called “suspicious behaviors” which include:

• Excessive laughter
• Wearing a disguise

What this means is that, according to the TSA, Goofy is a terrorist because he exhibits both of these suspicious behaviors.

90 more “suspicious behaviors” you’d better not exhibit at Disneyland or Seaworld

Excessive laughter and wearing a disguise are only two of a whopping 92 suspicious behaviors the TSA says might make you a terrorist. The Intercept published this widely-ridiculed list which claims that all the following behaviors might also make you a terrorist:

• Carrying an almanac
• Arriving late for your flight
• Carrying prepaid phone cards
• Gazing down
• Having eyes too wide open
• Clearing your throat too frequently
• Complaining about the TSA screening process (“Don’t touch my junk!”)
• Having a bobbing Adam’s apple

Fascinatingly, the TSA does not list “wearing a vest lined with explosives” as suspicious behavior. Nor does the federal agency think it’s suspicious to sexually molest travelers as this former TSA agent now admits happened every day at airports across America.

In any given crowd of Disneyland tourists being observed by the TSA, the TSA agent is the most likely criminal in the room!

Disney might be a terrorist organization…

When The Intercept attempted to get a comment on all this from Disneyland, they hit a brick wall. “Disney World did not respond to requests for comment,” says their article.

But not responding to questions is also a “suspicious behavior,” according to the TSA. So Disneyland’s refusal to respond to questions about why it is using the TSA’s loony tunes behavior profiling program to catch transportation terrorists inside the Magic Kingdom is, itself, an indicating that the Disney corporation might itself be run by terrorists.

Whatever the case, I’m pretty sure the TSA found time to engage in the sexual molestation of Disney characters. How do I know? Because someone told me the TSA was “f—–g Goofy!”

Source

Food Chain Catastrophe: Emergency Shut Down Of West Coast Fisheries: “Populations Have Crashed 91 Percent”

Mac Slavo — SHTFplan April 17, 2015

Earlier this week Michael Snyder warned that the bottom of our food chain is going through a catastrophic collapse with sea creatures dying in absolutely massive numbers. The cause of the problem is a mystery to scientists who claim that they can’t pinpoint how or why it’s happening.

What’s worse, the collapse of sea life in the Pacific Ocean isn’t something that will affect us several decades into the future. The implications are being seen right now, as evidenced by an emergency closure of fisheries along the West coast this week.

On Wednesday federal regulators announced the early closure of sardine fisheries in California, Oregon and Washington. According to the most recent data, the sardine populations has been wiped out with populations seeing a decline of 91% in just the last eight years.

Meeting outside Santa Rosa, California, the Pacific Fishery Management Council voted to direct NOAA Fisheries Service to halt the current season as early as possible, affecting about 100 fishing boats with sardine permits…

The action was taken based on revised estimates of sardine populations, which found the fish were declining in numbers faster than earlier believed…

The council did not take Wednesday’s decision lightly and understood the pain the closure would impose on the fishing industry, said council member Michele Culver, representing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. She added that it was necessary because a new assessment of sardine stocks showed they were much lower than estimated last year, when harvest quotas were set.

Source: New York Times via Steve Quayle / ENEnews

Sardines, like honey bees, don’t seem important to the casual observer. But just like honey bees, which are experiencing their own colony collapse, they are critical to the propagation of the global food chain. The immediate effects can be seen on the creatures next in line:

90 percent of this year’s class of sea lion pups were starving for lack of sardines to eat.

The sardine populations have crashed 91 percent since 2007,” he said after the vote. “We would have liked to see this happen much sooner, but now we can start to rebuild this sardine population that is so important to the health of the ocean.”

But even closing of commercial fisheries may not be the solution. As Snyder points out in the aforementioned report, there are some unexplained phenomena occurring in the Pacific ocean and either scientists don’t have a clue what is happening, or someone is keeping a gag order on researchers.

According to two University of Washington scientific research papers that were recently released, a 1,000 mile stretch of the Pacific Ocean has warmed up by several degrees, and nobody seems to know why this is happening.  This giant “blob” of warm water was first observed in late 2013, and it is playing havoc with our climate.  And since this giant “blob” first showed up, fish and other sea creatures have been dying in absolutely massive numbers.

The issue could potentially be one of climate change – but not the kind of climate change we hear from politicians who just want to put carbon tax credits in their pocket. Rather, we could be talking about cyclical climate shifts that have occurred regularly throughout the course of earth’s history. And with those shifts come massive migrations and species die-offs.

Or, as one contributor at ENEnews.com suggested, the answer to why this is happening should be obvious:

We have three cores melted out of their reactor buildings, lost in the mudrock and sandstone, which we have failed to locate and mitigate.

We have an underground river running under the ruins, which we have failed to divert around the reactors.

We have three empty reactors, containing nothing but corium splatter left when they blew up and melted out.

We have the Pacific Ocean Ecosystem, which we have stressed beyond endurance, through ocean dumping, over fishing, agricultural runoff, and now unrestricted radiation.

We have the sudden collapse of the Pacific Ocean Ecosystem, with a threatened collapse of the biosphere.

We continue to allow corporate and governmental inaction.

What in hell did you think was going to happen?

Something is wrong with world’s food chain and one Harvard Professor suggested last year that recent signs, namely with the die-off of honey bee populations, are a prelude of things to come:

But he now warns that a pollinator drop could be the least our worries at this point.

That it may be a sign of things to come – bees acting as the canary in the coalmine. That not only are we connected to bees through our food supply, but that the plight that so afflicts them may very well soon be our own.

Could it be that the collapse of honey bee colonies, mass sea life die-offs, and changing climates in once lush growing regions are all the result of the same underlying phenomena?

If so, then we can soon expect not just higher food prices, but a breakdown in the food chain itself.

And though none of us can truly prepare for a decades’ long (or longer) food disaster and the complexities that would come along with it (like mass migrations and resource wars), we can take steps to make ourselves as self sustainable as possible, while also preparing emergency plans to respond to the initial brunt of the force should it hit.

 

Source

Germany Approves Fifth ‘Special’ Submarine for Israel

Hillel Fendel — Israel National News April 13, 2015

Israeli Dolphin submarine, capable of firing nuclear armed cruise missiles. Click to enlarge

Israeli Dolphin submarine, capable of firing nuclear armed cruise missiles. Click to enlarge

Germany as approved the delivery of the fifth of six promised submarines to Israel – amid claims that the sub will be outfitted with nuclear weapons. Is this part of Israel’s answer to the US nuclear agreement with Iran?

The German Federal Security Council, which monitors Germany’s export of military goods, has given the green light for the delivery of another submarine to Israel. The news has renewed claims that Israel will fit the sub with one or more nuclear-tipped cruise missiles.

The six submarines ordered by Israel several years ago have been and are being built by the German shipyard HDW in Kiel. Four submarines have already been delivered to Israel; the last one, the INS Tanin, was handed over to Israel last September. Vice Admiral Ram Rotberg said at the time that it “can dive deeper, go farther for a longer time and can operate at a level we have not seen until today.”

The fifth submarine, and the latest to be approved, will be the INS Rahav. A sixth one is to be delivered by 2017, and Israel has even been reported to be interested in ordering three more.

Germany’s Spiegel news outlet has often reported that by supplying Israel with the submarines, Germany is actually “helping Israel develop its military nuclear capabilities.” Spiegel has quoted former Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak as saying that Germans should be “proud” that they have secured the existence of the state of Israel “for many years.”

The submarine missiles can be launched using a previously secret hydraulic ejection system.

Coincidentally or not, controversial Egyptian TV presenter Tawfik Okasha called on Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu over the weekend to bomb Iran – and promised Egyptian support for “our dear friend Netanyahu,”

Okasha said. “Please, Iran faces you and the Bushehr reactor faces you. Put your trust in Allah and bomb it. We are with you. And if you need fuel for the jets, we will give it to you.”

 

Source

Kabbalah Destroyed My Marriage

by Tony — (henrymakow.com) April 17, 2015

In 2005, I married a young Russian woman here in Florida USA. Natalie was 24; I was 51, a successful sales rep. Three years into the marriage, everything was perfect. We were a happy couple in love with life and each other.
Then one day, while surfing the Internet, she stumbled upon Kabbalah and became totally captivated with this “Jewish Science.” She pushed me to share her interest but I always refused.
This refusal caused a lot of friction. She said the teachings and principles were more for men than women: For “it” to work, her man had to be involved. She said that the highest-level people are Kabbalists…and that all others are just farm animals.
She didn’t mention Satan or Satanic Worship but they may have disguised that in the teachings.
I am a free thinker and do not want to be subjected to mind control. While she was reading Kaballah, I was studying Illuminati Jewish World Domination and 9/11 and many other false flag ops. I was watching them destroy my country with their death grip on our money and media and government and military and just about everything else. I tried to get her to join me but she did not listen, even though she is not Jewish. However, it didn’t affect our sex life since Kabbalah is all about the woman serving the man and making him happy.

OBSESSION

Continues …

‘We control US politicians like marionettes’ – Former Israeli politician

Brandon Martinez — Non-Aligned Media April 6, 2015

do_zionists_control_america_cartoon

Do Zionists control America?
Yossi Sarid, a former member of the Israeli Knesset, seems to think so. In a February 2015 Haaretz column, Sarid wrote:
In these very moments, the protocols are being rewritten. Rich Jews are writing them in their own handwriting. They, in their wealth, are confirming with their own signatures what anti-Semites used to slander them with in days gone by: We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress, and the congressmen are nothing but marionettes who do our will. If they don’t understand our words, they’ll understand our threats. And if in the past, we ran the show from behind the scenes, now we’re doing it openly, from center stage. And if you forget our donations, the wellspring will run dry.
The candid admission is one of many from Israeli politicians and Jewish commentators who openly boast of their power over the United States government, media and financial world.
Believing themselves to have a ‘divine right’ to rule, these Old Testament fundamentalists apparently want us to know we are nothing more than serfs and cotton-pickers on a global Zionist slave plantation.
As one of Israel’s chief religious leaders Ovadia Yosef put it, “Goyim [non-Jews] were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.”

Source