HenryMakow.com – May 30, 2024
Satanist social engineers have succeeded in undermining heterosexuality for the purpose of depopulation.
Have you noticed? YouTube is full of videos of women complaining that men have lost interest in courting them. Here’s an example.
Having eschewed the roles of wife and mother, they have no value to men except for sex which is widely available without marriage.
Woman’s stock-in-trade always has been to nurture and empower husbands and children.
They are loved and cherished in return.
Unable to love, they get no love. Men are going their own way (MGTOW.) Men are not stupid. The courts are rigged against them. They see that woman’s game is to seduce some sucker, have children and then live off of him.
As with God, they have been brainwashed to reject the thing they most need, and now they are roadkill. Their stock-in-trade is love but they can’t love men anymore.
Heterosexual marriage is based on the exchange of female (worldly) power for male power expressed as love. Men want power. Women want love. The heterosexual bond is based on this exchange. Women empower their men by accepting their leadership. By competing for power, they emasculate them. The destruction of the nuclear family is a plank in the Communist Manifesto. Feminism is Communist, (Satanist) subversion.
Taylor Caldwell (1900-1985) a British-born American novelist is a prime example of the (((Communist))) control of American culture. Despite being one of the most successful writers of the mid-20th century and author of 30 novels, there are no biographies or movies about her or her work. Our liberal cultural commissars flushed her down the memory hole. All art now must be agitprop, i.e. politically correct, because we live in a de facto Communist society. Taylor Caldwell was anti-Communist, and anti-feminist, as the following quote attests:
“There is no solid satisfaction in any career for a woman like myself. There is no home, no true freedom, no hope, no joy, no expectation for tomorrow, no contentment. I would rather cook a meal for a man and bring him his slippers and feel myself in the protection of his arms than have all the citations and awards and honors I have received worldwide, including the Ribbon of Legion of Honor and my property and my bank accounts. They mean nothing to me. And I am only one among the millions of sad women like myself.”
In the article below, written in 1970, she laments that feminists are ruining “nature’s great con” where men provided for wives and children.
“I fear that men are beginning to suspect that we women conned them through the centuries. I fear they are asking themselves — to women’s terrible hurt — why they should support an able-bodied woman who can earn a good living too, and why should they be responsible for providing a home for women.”
Men provided a home for women because women raised their children. Being a wife and mother was a respected and necessary role in society before the Communist cockroaches destroyed it. Unless a woman has exceptional talent, she finds her highest expression as a wife and mother. Women used to empower men (by being submissive) in exchange for his love and fidelity. Love is not free. It must be earned. Women earn lifelong love by nurturing husband and children. The Communists convinced them they can find permanent love by sex appeal or career achievement. People forget that the Communist goal is societal destruction.
Feminism brainwashed women to seek power instead of love. Now everyone is suffering. A woman was created by nature to bear children. Now many are rotting on the vine.
Below Taylor Caldwell relates how she wanted to be a traditional woman, but society wouldn’t permit it.
Updated from 29 July 7, 2023
“Feminism is the Real Enslavement of Women”
Abridged from Caldwell’s prescient 1970 classic “Women’s Lib: They’re Spoiling Eve’s Great Con Game.”
By Taylor Caldwell (1900-1985) — (henrymakow.com)
The left, alas, is now running yet another “Liberation Movement,” this one championing females who believe that the male sex has somehow done the ladies wrong. The members of this Front say they want all the spoils the boys appear to be getting out of life.
They’re quite mad, of course. What these “girls” are about to do is ruin the biggest Con Game, and the most ancient, which one section of humanity has ever imposed on another, since Eve invented it.
It is unusual for a woman to say that her traditional role was designed by her to fool the men, but it is still not quite right, either: feminism was brought in to destroy White society, not women’s comfort, although we can argue that White society was more feminine than the others, and that the non-White societies are more macho and primitive, making Caldwell right by a roundabout route. Her real name was Jewish and Revilo Oliver wrote about her disparagingly. It is possible to speak about “Eve” to Americans, but in England the Darwinist interpretations of our history begins to circulate better, and Steve Jones did some work on male-female relations of the sort we will need to understand. The two sexes are always working for a better deal with the other
(begin, not begins)
Anyone for soccer, rugby, cricket, boxing, weight lifting, etc.? Come on girls let’s be having you!😉
“….that women in Russia are treated exactly as men, and are farm-laborers plowing and seeding and harvesting, and they manhandle big machines in factories, empty garbage, and shovel snow, learn to be bricklayers and steel-workers as well as doctors and lawyers, serve in the armies, drive trucks, wear felt pants, dig sewers and lay pipes, clean chimneys and work in the forests, and do the heaviest of manual labor….”
I’ll bet there are plenty of prolapsed wombs amongst such women. No matter the propaganda, womens’ bodies are not designed to do heavy lifting or manual labour.
I read a few of her books in the 70’s.
I remember only one about Judas.
A rising star of the Feminista Mafia in the mould of Liz Truss is Alicia Kearns obviously being groomed as she has the safe seat of Rutland. Wikipedia states she was an activist for Amnesty international which may explain why she wants to bomb Serbia back to the stone age, NATO’s favourite way of implementing “Western values”. After watching the ex British diplomat Alistair Crooke on Judging Freedom he must be wondering how such imbeciles could rise the ladder of politics.
Of late I’ve started to take an interest in the likes of Jane Austin and Anthony Trollope. The latter owing to Henry Makow’s mention of the TV adapted version of “The Way We Live Now”. I’m halfway through it. A good watch, and a cheap buy.
The nineteenth century novelists took a whimsical look on the relationships of men and women. As human beings, both the romantic as well as the materialistic vied for supremacy. This literature is a time capsule for how the dynamic between the sexes played out before the socialisation of family fortunes to the state interfered with the dynamic; to wit, as divorce has increased, the state has often become a surrogate husband – for better or worse – to a single parent(woman) family.
The notion of “Sense and Sensibility” has seen the the triumph of the latter in the sixties onward. To have referred to the “permissive society” in this time revealed oneself to be an old fuddy duddy. It has taken me a long time to realise that the traditional expectations of men and women’s roles has been misdirected by modern thinking. There is a natural asymmetry to a marriage. Even the word marriage has been corrupted by the idea that two people of the same sex can be “married”.
Life has always been tough, but at least the traditional expectations gave men and women clear goals. The often heard criticism of women and men that the former are only interested in money and men only in physical attraction, ignores the fundamental need for a woman to have the safe environment for the raising of children and the man to want the healthiest woman for his children. So often it seems the natural inclinations of men and women have been criticised in this respect. In its place with have a sensibility of romantic love occupying a world within an impossible vacuum, disconnected from the material world.
Marriage has eluded me. I think of myself as a sort of monk anyway and am happy with it. Indeed, I identified the need in my late twenties to late forties to be financially attractive; alas, I could not pay the price of wage slavery to entertain the idea of attempting to appear as a “good catch”. Nevertheless, if I was a father I would tell a son or daughter from a young age the real “fact of life” regarding the navigation of male and female relationships. I think for the most part, there is a woolliness of expectations with young people borne of the misinformation they have been subject to for generations.
I was a supporter of Women’s Liberation in the 1970s, But I warned women when I could that if they continued down the road of adopting ‘patriarchal’ behaviours they would pay the price. I asked a group of women in my college class are you willing to work forty years of your life and at the end drop dead? Are you willing to make the sacrifices that men make? I also stated that for every ‘liberated’ woman there was a liberated man.
And then began the feminizing of men and the destruction of the nuclear family. Now we have the consequences. Ultimately there will be no society and no family, only separate units off production that serve the State Capitalist system (Marxism/Communism). But not to worry: Nature is the default position and ultimately the delusional psychopaths that think they can make the world as they wish it to be will be destroyed. In the meantime they will do great harm.
The political left of mainstream politics maybe but the real grassroots left has been purged. Look what they did to Jeremy Corbyn. I doubt Bernie Sanders is working class left but as faux left as he is they won’t even let him in. Calling Biden, Starmer and Hillary “left” is what liars and morons do as they stand to the right of many conservatives. Just ask them to pay proper taxes to hear their right wing talking points about how tax evasion is “prudent investing” not tax evasion.
Conceding to gratuitous jibes, I’d have to say, that I wouldn’t have married Taylor Caldwell either. Not if her photo’s a fair resemblance of her, anyway. Was Ms. Caldwell born in the small Lincolnshire town of Grantham, by any chance?
Fripperies aside, Taylor Caldwell’s rueful reflections on feminism and matrimony are rather impressively prescient, writing, as she was, in 1970. The passages following the remark,
“I fear that men are beginning to suspect that we women conned them through the centuries”
are extraordinary in their predictive acuity. The author’s plaintive forecast, that women’s liberation will lead to men’s abandonment of chivalric abidences; to their alienation from any sense of natural duty and will, ultimately, find expression, as men choosing to disengage entirely from the cultural saturation of feminist ideology. This is exactly what has happened, as evidenced by the popularity of the MGTOW movement (Men Go Their Own Way) and in the rise of the celebrity “manhood coach” like the overwrought drill-sergeant, Andrew Tate. Or, indeed, for the more sensitively-inclined aspirational man, there’s guidance in the emotional wisdom, gifted by Dr. Jordan Peterson, that bloody great cry-baby from Canada.
I don’t know anything about Taylor Caldwell’s fiction but conspiracy, treachery and intrigues and particularly, romance, inform her concerns here.
At the risk of showing myself up, I’m going to have a guess, that Taylor Caldwell wrote spy novels, in the mould of John Buchan’s “The Thirty-Nine Steps.” If you’ve actually read her, don’t spare me.
Caldwell’s affluence and nineteenth-century romanticism are hinted at in her appeal,
“It is a woman’s nature to make a sanctuary of love and delight in her home. That is the true ‘career’ for women.”
That all depends on your worldly circumstances, Taylor.
I was brought up in the 1970’s. Apart from attending to three children, my mum worked part-time week days and full-time at weekends and during school holidays. My dad always seemed to be at work. Nannies were unheard of: my siblings and I roamed the streets and beaches with our scruffy little band of kindred waifs and strays. Our family home was no sanctuary of delight either. I’m not complaining, mind. I’m just saying that, even if they’d wanted to, my mum and millions of mums like her in Britain, weren’t allowed to be “career” homebuilders or housewives, by exigency of economy.
By no means, though, does that invalidate Caldwell’s core exposition. I liked her candidness, as well, when touching upon her own unrequited marital aspirations. I thought it brave. I still wouldn’t have married her but I bet that Taylor Caldwell was fascinating company.
The communists never really “solve” problems. They “eliminate” them usually by eliminating people and everything good thing they mistake as the cause of the problems they see. Their Marxist-feminist creed can be summed up on the basis that sexual differences breed inequality and children, and children cause privation which breeds more inequality, and that those differences, therefore, have to be eliminated. Women must become more masculine and men more effeminate through all forms of social, political and biological engineering.
Sorry folks – the so-called “sexual revolution” did not “evolve”. The purge was as orchestrated as Stanford’s Paul Ehrlich’s Population Bomb, a person very much of the same ilk as those controlling the media, the entertainment industry at the time, the secular educational systems, the major political parties, and who also were in many cases the disciples of the Rothschild-sponsored communist movement.
Their anthesis to family values and people having children has been totally Malthusian, Marxist, eugenic and self-centred. They began their concerted purge on family life and women in the 1960’s with a very orchestrated “sexual revolution” mainly through the media, the entertainment industry, and the universities, imposing on us their false and sallow freedoms along with their insane equality diktats, while using their stooges to propagate the idea, “In a pluralistic society, you cannot impose your moral views on others.” That slogan became a mantra even with liberals in the clergy. Yet, there was never, ever anything “pluralistic” about their creed, as anyone who had any Christian moral views on any issue was banned from the public square of moral relativism regarding all matters relating to sex and family values.
Anything which conflicted with what was deemed as “politically correct” and did not get the juice of the media was simply a private imposition to be banned. Only their views as to what was right and wrong had any real currency. Along with the death of real freedom in the market place came the death of truth, and especially truth with respect to what most women really wanted – all of that universal stuff unjustly deemed corny, archaic and politically incorrect, called “SECURITY” with a faithful and dependable male provider, “CHILDREN” with a loving father, a “HAPPY FAMILY”, and “ROMANCE” – AND IN THAT ORDER. Yet, those are the things which are JUST because they are DUE to women according to their very natures, and as such all men ought to consider that entitlement and their duties in their relation to women. It involves a great deal more than simply opening doors for them, and the reason is because children are our most valuable asset whether or not the Rothschild’s, the Windsor’s, the Rockefeller’s, the Gate’s, the Buffets or any other plutocrat or half-backed Rhodes or Harvard scholar thinks otherwise.
The devaluing of children axiomatically has entailed the devaluing of women, most of whom wanted to be the center of a family, and mothers. They have had to assume male roles. Their entire biological Identity as women so central to everything and complimentary to everything male was thrown into the materialist scrap heap. Vive la différence became tuer la difference
Western ideas about freedom and fulfillment are all in the wrong places because communists have been put in all of the right places asserting their powers over us, by moguls who are the anthesis of anything communist. The money-power cabal which runs things has been busy for well over 200 years concentrating and consolidating wealth and power into fewer and fewer hands through amoral principles such as might-makes-right and the-ends-justify-the-means. Ruthlessness and dishonesty are their principal tools and communism is one of their grandest pretexts. They are not bound by God’s laws, only by their own.
In real life, Caldwell pretended to be a reincarnation of the historical figures she wrote about in her novels, which was one reason Revilo Oliver poured scorn on her. She was very “popular” (hyped up as a Jew, I assume) as a novelist in her time
For some time now I’ve been struck by
greater parallels and similarities between different species of the same sex then of the within-species of opposite sex.
Animal males respond to the same innate drives and forces across numerous species, including primate and human and likewise for the females.
And I would have as hard a time explaining this de-construct to a human female as to say, a female howler monkey (not saying all females like to howl, the simian simile is as unfortunate as it may well be apt.)
Final aside: Caldwell’s diction reminds me of Darkmoon’s to a tight degree, manages to be simultaneously plaintive and accusatory … passive-aggressive is the preferred jew term I think.
Some excellent comments.
That’s interesting, Lewis. So she was a bit of a Joan Grant then? Once upon a winged pharaoh?
Funny but I would have bet on Taylor Caldwell being Revilo Oliver’s kind of gal. He was a notoriously fussy fellow though.
I’ve noticed quite a bit lately, that young men in the street seem to be pushing prams/pushchairs. I’m expecting them to be wearing dresses anytime now.😉
I was mildly surprised that you didn’t publish my comments about equity etc.
I thought they might be useful (obviously 😉 )
I apologise if they caused offence.
P
No comment was received. Ed.
“Pharaoh Queens of Nubia : Amanirenas stops The Roman Empire”
29 May 2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGJEhyUpLs
by Historia Africana
“Sudan or Nubia in its later days, was governed by a dynasty of Queen-Pharaohs who held the title of Kandake (known as Candace by Western scholars).
We will explore how Queen Amanirenas defeated the Romans during the latter’s attempt to conquer Nubia. Kandake Amanirenas personally led her troops into battle, directly confronting the Romans. Despite losing an eye in combat, she persisted in the war, ultimately driving the Romans out of her country for good.”
13.03 ” just before the birth of Christ / several powerful Meroitic Queens known as Kandakes
(known as Candace by Western scholars) ruled Nubia Kush among them Kandake Amanirenas”
CIA O
Fertility Market Trends
Sperm counts are down in a big way for males and likely up for females, but birth rates are at an all-time low in the West.
Estrogen has surged to all-time highs in our water sources and food supplies which scientists say could be causing a downturn in the production of testosterone.
With the increased demand for equalized estrogen levels for those in the US military and the resulting demand for combat skirts and high-heel combat boots, investment returns in Chinese military-uniform manufactures, Jihua Group, Jiangsu Hongdou Industry, and Alpha Clothing, have surged to all-time highs.
While birth rates generally plummet in the West, there is a surge in the rates from illegals and immigrants with higher sperm counts and especially from cultures which hate the West and are practicing cradle-warfare and various acts of rapine.
From the globalist perspective, the fertility forecast is for diaper and baby food demands to decrease. The long-range demand for schools, teachers, milk & food production, sports activities, travel, cars, trucks, houses, buildings, computers, and games will plumet over the next 20 years and level off by 2050. With population collapse from decreased fertility and the demand for fewer and fewer children, demand in all sectors of the economy will decrease. This will remove the burden from all of our systems. It will make for a cleaner planet and more resources and free stuff for those who are deemed to be essential and allowed to reproduce. Property values will decrease as will value in most other assets. However, this will be balanced in the short term to some extent by the continued debasement of currencies and rising inflation. Immigration will no longer be a source of population sustainability in the West after the next 10 years by faithfully following globalist sustainability and population-reduction agendas. With this trend the most promising long-term investment are in things with no real intrinsic values such as in carbon-credits or virtual-reality technologies enabling the essential ones to enjoy simulations of being in groups and interacting with real people.
Critiquing the failures of leftist women (seeking power, using sex appear), and not drawing attention that it was men, wholesale, who have failed women and children by selling them out to the Jews. This article does not reach to the heart of the issue – weak, stupid and traitorous men. Women genuinely are the victims because it’s not women running the world is it?
Men aren’t loved by women because they are unlovable. Who is protecting women and children from Jews? No one. Society is failing because men have allowed Jews to take over, and the results are death and annihilation for everyone.
In the grasp of feminist realities there are still some old (nearly forgotten) memories left of times where the attraction of femininity and the “seeking male” had come to natural terms in regards to “relationships”. Monty Python came up with a marvelous piece which must have been eradicated in the empire that once ruled the seas. Here is a Brazilian link:
https://www.vagalume.com.br/monty-python/the-vagina-song.html
“Some of them are hairy
Some of them are bald
Some are kinda scary
And this is what they’re called…
Some belong to virgins
They’re really tight and strong
But big or small, I love ’em all
That’s why I sing my song….
Some of them are smelly
Like clams, and fish, and such
Some smell like a summers’ eve
‘Cause they’ve been douched too much….
They call that thing vagina (X2)….
Nothing could be finer than to be in a vagina in the
morning”
@ Pan – “Women genuinely are the victims because it’s not women running the world is it?” You got a point there “victim”, but keep in mind that men could not have done it without those victims always trying to find better deals and Jewish fame and shame was and is always a best seller.