Turkiye Today – Nov 2, 2026
U.S. commentator Tucker Carlson claimed Monday that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is pressuring U.S. President Donald Trump to launch a nuclear strike on Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain, an alleged underground enrichment site, and that Trump could decide by Nov. 7.
Carlson offered no evidence beyond an unnamed “informed observer,” and there was no official confirmation from the White House, the Pentagon or Israel. Trump, for now, wants to let negotiations with Iran play out, Axios reported, citing U.S. and Israeli sources.
“Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran,” Carlson wrote on X. “‘Bibi calls Trump about it every day,’ says an informed observer.”
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) November 2, 2026
Carlson: Pickaxe Mountain beyond conventional weapons
Carlson claimed that no conventional U.S. weapon can penetrate the roughly 300 feet of granite protecting the tunnels at Pickaxe Mountain, leaving a nuclear strike as “the only military option.”
“Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons,” he wrote. “To his credit, he’s hesitating.”
Carlson said Vance and envoy Steve Witkoff argue a deal with Iran can be made, and claimed Netanyahu, unable to form a government after last week’s election, “needs this war.” He also claimed Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi on Sept. 27 to seek Emirati support for an attack and was refused.
None of the claims could be independently verified.

Natanz nuclear facility, near Pickaxe Mountain, which has seen extensive work recently to strengthen fortifications ahead of anticipated US/Israeli strikes. Click to enlarge
See: Iran reportedly fortifies nuclear sites as it prepares for possible U.S. strikes after midterms
Axios: ‘Tough’ Trump-Netanyahu call
Trump and Netanyahu held a candid call Saturday about U.S. talks with Iran and how quickly to return to combat, Axios reported. Netanyahu is pressing Trump to strike immediately after Tuesday’s midterm elections, the sources said. The Israeli source called the call “tough” while the U.S. source called it “direct.”
Trump told reporters Saturday that negotiations were “going fine” and that he was not “in much of a hurry,” but said the U.S. still had to “take care” of one or two Iranian nuclear sites.
“We can do that in 10 minutes. We have that planned. You can look at Pickaxe Mountain. We need to take care of that. We can do that very quickly,” Trump said.
Qatar talks continue
Qatari mediators met Iranian officials Sunday for a third consecutive day to restart direct U.S.-Iran negotiations.
“We are making every effort in this regard and hope that the other side will demonstrate enough rationality to choose diplomacy over other paths,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said, adding there was no agreement yet.
The U.S. and Israel launched attacks against Iran on Feb. 28. Tehran retaliated against Israel and U.S. targets in the region before a ceasefire was reached in April.
The U.S. and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding on freedom of navigation in the strait on June 18, but implementation stalled over disagreements concerning security arrangements.
Carlson’s claims about Pickaxe Mountain come days before the U.S. midterms, as Washington weighs both diplomacy and renewed strikes
