Sartre and de Beauvoir meeting over coffee
HenryMakow.com – Sept 7, 2026
“The administrative investigation confirms the philosopher’s manipulative behavior. In June 1943, the Ministry of Education removes Beauvoir from her duties for conduct incompatible with the teaching profession.”
The father of Existentialism and the mother of Feminism were Satanists.
by Auguste Bardamu@AugusteBardamu — (henrymakow.com)
The mother of modern feminism used her authority as a teacher to seduce her young students and deliver them to Jean-Paul Sartre.
History has made Simone de Beauvoir the absolute icon of women’s emancipation. The philosopher who taught women to free themselves from men’s domination.
Click to enlarge
But behind the legend lies an unrelenting moral and sexual abuse of power.
In the 1930s, Beauvoir taught philosophy. She targeted Bianca Bienenfeld in particular, a student who was only 16 years old. She began an intimate relationship with the teenager, psychologically isolated her, then introduced her into the bed of her partner, Jean-Paul Sartre.
Henry moore the sculpture guy was a satanist pedophile and so was picasso
the the hatton gardon jew Manny Valance was part of the stern gang
he whistlebore that the isreali premier Menachem begin was a serial kidnapper of small arab boys, it was manny valence who took authorities to where the bodies were buried
Menachem begin was jimmy savilles first protector
like the pedophil french jew Cohen Bandit
who was for for decades darling of jewBRD TV,
greenleftists + BaderMeinhof Red ArmyFraction .
but they killed mostly those VIPs the Mossad
had in view .
like Aldo Moro targeted by Kissinger
for a Gladio/Red Brigade/Mossad strike .
seems OlofPalme + Brevik are related to
same filth.
Oh dear…. another “absolute icon of women’s emancipation” bites the dust… 🥺
Removed from her duties in France, June 1943… The rotten satanist couples books were mandatory ‘literature’ for roman catholic school exams in the sixties in the Netherlands, while she really was the ‘Ghislaine Maxwell’ of the post WW2 period.
On Makow’s site a commentor calling himself “Anonymous” said that Socrates and his entire inner circle were homosexual and engaged in the systemic exploitation and sexual grooming of young boys, and that is why he was put to death. There is absolutely no basis for that statement regarding Socrates and the person who wrote it is a total fake.
“Historical evidence regarding Socrates and his circle must be understood through the lens of ancient Athenian culture, where modern concepts like “homosexual” did not exist. While historical texts show that Socrates and his followers operated within a society that institutionalized pederasty—a socially accepted relationship between an adult male (erastes) and a youth (eromenos)—verifiable evidence shows that Socrates explicitly rejected the sexual consummation and exploitation associated with the practice.
The Cultural Context of Ancient Athens: In classical Athens, adult men were generally expected to marry women and father children, but they routinely engaged in romantic or aesthetic attachments with adolescent young men (usually between late puberty and early adulthood).
The Nature of Pederasty: This dynamic was viewed by the Athenian aristocracy as an educational and mentoring institution. The older man was expected to tutor the youth in politics, warfare, and virtue in exchange for companionship.
Pederasty)Social and Legal Rules: The system carried strict social boundaries. It was considered deeply shameful for the youth to be treated as a passive sexual object, to sell his favors for money, or for the relationship to continue after the youth grew a beard.
The Specific Evidence Regarding Socrates: Because Socrates wrote nothing down, our primary historical sources are the contemporary accounts of his students, chiefly Plato and Xenophon. Both writers explicitly state that Socrates broke with Athenian tradition by keeping his relationships entirely chaste and non-physical. In Plato’s Symposium, the handsome general Alcibiades explicitly details how he tried to sexually seduce Socrates but failed completely. Alcibiades laments that despite sleeping under the same cloak with Socrates, he arose the next morning “as though from the bed of a father or an older brother.”
Sublimation into Philosophy: In dialogues like the Phaedrus and Charmides, Plato describes Socrates as highly sensitive to physical beauty, but argues that Socrates channeled this attraction strictly into intellectual development—a concept that evolved into the modern term “Platonic love.”
Xenophon’s Accounts: In Xenophon’s Memorabilia, Socrates is depicted as strongly condemning physical pederastic relationships, warning that giving into carnal desires with a youth enslaves a man’s reason.”
or this answer from another search engine may do:
“”The formal indictment was, in substance, that Socrates:
– did not recognize the gods recognized by Athens;
– introduced new divine beings or religious practices; and
– corrupted the young.
Neither Plato’s Apology nor Xenophon’s accounts of the charge mentions homosexual conduct, pederasty, sexual abuse, or sexual relations with boys.
That is a very important point. “Corrupting the youth” was not an ancient euphemism demonstrably meaning “sexually abusing boys.” In the context of the trial, it referred principally to Socrates’ intellectual, religious, moral, and political influence upon younger Athenians.””
Surprising info here. I spent a semester in college studying Being and Nothingness but never saw or heard a word connecting Sartre to pedophilia. In fact, the German professor never mentioned morality at all.
Studying deBeauvoir was not an option per the decision of the Dean of the dept. No one would say why, but perhaps this article does.