Mike Whitney – The Unz Review Aug 25, 2026
Winston Churchill, for all his triumphs and successes, was probably the man most responsible for the early and rapid collapse of the British empire….What brought the British empire down as rapidly and terribly as it did was world War 2. In my opinion, WW2 was exactly what Churchill called it “The Unnecessary War”. And the fatal blunder was the decision in panic of the British government after Czechoslovakia fell apart in March, 1939, was to give an unsolicited war guarantee to a collection of Polish colonels who had a romantic view of their own warlike capacities , who participated in the breakup of Czechoslovakia, and Britain gave them this guarantee to back them in a cause –control of Danzig– where they thought the Germans were fundamentally right. And that war guarantee which stiffened the Polish spine, gave the Poles the backbone to stand up to Hitler who now had no way out but to take Danzig. Hitler attacked Poland, Britain declared war on Germany, and that six year war brought down the British empire. And the man who was driving hardest for war with Germany was Winston Churchill Pat Buchanan Interview, You Tube (:29 seconds)
“We must recognize that many of the fundamental ideas that dominate our present-day world were founded upon a particular understanding of that wartime history, and if there seems good reason to believe that narrative is substantially false, perhaps we should begin questioning the framework of beliefs erected upon it.” Ron Unz, Editor The Unz Review
I have long thought that our over-simplified, “cartoonish” portrayal of Adolf Hitler as ‘the embodiment of all evil’ has distorted our understanding of the events leading up to the Second World War. Hitler may have been a tyrant and a monster, but his strategic objectives do not appear to align with what we are told by western analysts and historians. Hitler’s invasion of Poland was not the first step in a broader campaign aimed at world domination nor did he plan to conquer all of western Europe. His goals were much more modest and reasonable. He simply wanted to recapture the territory that had been seized from Germany under the terms of the universally reviled Versailles Treaty. The Treaty –which arbitrarily partitioned Germany, stole its material assets, slashed the size of its army, and imposed reparations so big that the nation would remain a permanent colony of western bankers and financiers– also left 8 million German nationals marooned in countries outside of their own sovereign borders. Poland was one of those countries and Hitler intended to ‘put it right’. Here’s how Ron Unz summed it up:
Hitler’s final demand, that 95% German Danzig be returned to Germany just as its inhabitants desired, was an absolutely reasonable one, and only a dreadful diplomatic blunder by the British had led the Poles to refuse the request, thereby provoking the war. The widespread later claim that Hitler sought to conquer the world was totally absurd, and the German leader had actually made every effort to avoid war with Britain or France….
(Hitler) hoped to finally settle the Polish border dispute, offering concessions far more generous than any of his democratically elected Weimar predecessors had ever considered. But Poland’s dictatorship instead spent months rejecting his attempts at negotiations and also began brutal mistreatment of its German minority, finally forcing Hitler into declaring war. Why Everything You Know About World War II Is Wrong, Interview Ron Unz
So, the dominant narrative that we all learned in grade school is (as Unz says) “substantially false” which calls into question the “framework of beliefs erected upon it”, particularly that WW2 was the “good war”, a Manichean struggle between the forces of good and evil. But it wasn’t a struggle between good and evil, because as Unz points out, Hitler’s claims were “reasonable” and legitimate. Versailles was a catastrophe from the get-go and Hitler set out to roll back its demands as would any German patriot. Imagine if the US went to war with Mexico and foreign politicians decided that the US must hand over Texas, Arizona and California as part a final settlement. The public outcry would be so ferocious that eventually a politician would emerge (like Hitler) who would promise to retake the stolen territories by hook or crook. That same rule applies to Hitler. He was just doing what he was elected to do.
The whole idea that Poland was just the first steppingstone in a broader campaign for world domination is laughable. There’s no evidence to support that at all. Hitler wanted to rebuild post-Versailles Germany and put as many of the 8 million German nationals who found themselves outside the country, back under German rule. This wasn’t a global power-grab, it was a firm but responsible way to reach a just outcome, which is evident by the way he pursued his goal, through negotiation. Once again, most educated people in the west seem to think that Hitler overpowered Czechoslovakia and then marched into Poland the next day. Wrong. Hitler pursued a diplomatic path for nearly a year. Negotiations with Poland lasted roughly 10 months, from late October 1938 until the invasion on 1 September 1939. In other words, Hitler showed great restraint and patience. So why would an impulsive, tyrannical hothead look for a diplomatic solution when he could simply deploy the Wehrmacht and crush the anemic Poles beneath his tank-tracks without batting an eye?
Maybe because he wasn’t an impulsive, tyrannical hothead after all. Maybe that’s just more of the same hyperbolic narrative that has colored our understanding of Hitler from the very beginning.
Video– Historian Darryl Cooper on Churchill — “Churchill Is the Chief Villain in WWII. ..Churchill is a terrorist… Hitler didn’t war with England.”
“Churchill Is the Chief Villain in WWII.”
Churchill was a fanatical Ziónist supported by wealthy financiers, including the Rothschild as documented in this thread.
Darryl Cooper (@martyrmade):
“Hítler started firing off peace proposals after the Poland invasion. Britain and… https://t.co/xpkzV5d38N pic.twitter.com/n4cupSXFXA
— Phantom Pain (@phantompain1984) August 17, 2026
Here’s where it gets interesting, because Poland is not some little blip on the radar. The whole history of WW2 rests on our understanding of who started the war and who is ultimately responsible for the war. And that honor goes to England not Germany. It wasn’t Germany that declared war on England. It was England that declared war on Germany on September 3, 1939, two days after Germany invaded Poland.
But if Germany invaded Poland than Germany must be responsible for starting the war.
No, because as Buchanan points out in the opening statement, Poland regarded Chamberlain’s “unsolicited war guarantee” as an insurance policy against a German invasion. As the author says, “that war guarantee which stiffened the Polish spine, gave the Poles the backbone to stand up to Hitler”. In other words, Polish leaders were duped into believing that they could thumb their nose at Hitler because the Brits ‘had their back.’ They didn’t need to negotiate or be reasonable because big brother would bail them out. Of course, big brother couldn’t bail them out because England had no combat troops, no military bases, no airfields, and no naval bases anywhere near Poland. So there was no way they could rescue Poland if Hitler attacked. Even so, they ignored all of that, shrugged off Hitler’s demands, and forced Hitler to invade. Poland fell in two weeks and Chamberlain never lifted a finger to help. (So much for British guarantees) In fact, it’s worse than that, because Hitler had formed an alliance with Stalin to divide Poland between themselves (The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact) thinking that the alliance would deter Chamberlain from declaring war. But Chamberlain wasn’t deterred. He stood firm and declared war anyway offering up Poland as a sacrificial lamb in order to drag all of continental Europe into a World War with Germany.
Buchanan describes Chamberlain’s war guarantee to Poland the “greatest blunder in British history” worse than the Munich Agreement. It provided a “blank check” to the Polish government who then refused to negotiate over Danzig (an overwhelmingly German city) and the Polish Corridor, issues that many British leaders believed should have been resolved in Germany’s favor. The guarantee transformed a limited German-Polish border dispute into a general European war that pitted Germany against the Allied Forces in western Europe and US. The eventual outcome of the conflict would be the destruction of Poland, the fall of France, the Blitz, and tens of millions of deaths, outcomes that were entirely avoidable.
So, Chamberlain’s war guarantee was the proximate cause of World War 2, not Hitler’s invasion. The guarantee not only ensured that Poland would be destroyed but also that a large swath of countries in eastern Europe would fall under the iron grip of Soviet Russia after the war ended. Apparently, none of the geniuses in Chamberlain’s cabinet were able to anticipate that dreary outcome.
Historian David Irving reveals Hitler’s secret peace offering to Churchill in June, 1940 (while Churchill was bombing Berlin)
“I will withdraw all German forces from everywhere in Europe except for the provinces which had always been German and which had been taken away from Germany at the end of the first world war….. I have the greatest admiration for the British and the British empire and I want the empire to survive into perpetuity and grow larger and larger. If the British empire at any time should threatened by some outside force,.. I guarantee that I will provide to the British whatever forces they may ask for to throw these aggressors out of the empire.”
David Irving details how many peace offers Germany made to Britain before finally retaliating. Including an offer to help defend Britain against any aggression by any other country.
Churchill not only refused to acknowledge the peace offers, but he ordered Britain to conduct 8… pic.twitter.com/169iccsWB3
— GeneralPatton’sGhost (@GeneralpattonS) October 27, 2025
And the consequences for England were equally dismal due largely to Churchill’s zealous commitment to a conflict in which Britain never should have participated. This is part of the story you will never find in the western histories where “bulldog” Churchill is regularly lionized as a symbol of moral fortitude and true grit. What’s lost in these glowing panegyrics is that the dissolute PM’s “incurable bad judgement” precipitated the end of the Empire and the sharp decline of Britain’s role in the world order. Churchill was given a prosperous and prestigious state to oversee, and left it a broken, bankrupt shambles requiring the handouts from foreign creditors.
Keep in mind, England was the world’s biggest creditor state when the war began but wound up as the world’s biggest debtor by war’s end. Take a look:
Grok– Before the Second World War began in 1939, the United Kingdom was still one of the world’s leading creditor nations (often described as the largest or among the very largest in terms of accumulated overseas investments and net external assets). British holdings of foreign securities, direct investments, and related income streams remained very large. By the end of the war in 1945, Britain’s position had been reversed:
Large volumes of overseas assets had been sold or liquidated to pay for essential war supplies. Britain had accumulated massive external liabilities, particularly the “sterling balances” owed to Commonwealth countries, India, Egypt, and others, plus obligations linked to American assistance. Net income from overseas investments fell sharply… Contemporary official assessments stated that Britain had “ceased to be a large-scale creditor country” and faced a severely weakened external financial position, ranking among the world’s major debtors relative to its pre-war standing.
By 1945, Britain’s external financial position had reversed dramatically: it faced large net liabilities, reduced investment income, and dependence on American financial support…. This shift from global creditor to major debtor was a direct consequence of the enormous cost of the wars and the need to finance them by drawing down assets and accumulating obligations. Grok
So, the war’s biggest cheerleader (Churchill) was, in reality, an incompetent, drunken buffoon who dragged his country to ruin in order to engage in a conflict which he later admitted was “unnecessary”. Shocking.


This is pure brilliance
Tony Blair shredded much of the truth in the secret documents from ww 2
Chamberlian had a secret team shown round Germany in a 4 year investigation
Hitler took them around military installations including peenamunde just being built
factories etc all was shown to the Brits
Hitler wanteda pact with Britain
he knew the jewish plan to wipe out the white race which we see now
In the bombing of Germany we knew where all the secret military installations were as they hadshown them to us
Rothschild made sure the superb medical factories were left intact as the Rockefellers wanted to seize them after the war as reparations
Hitler built up germany during the great depression and offered to help the UK do do like wise
Rudolf Hess was found innocent at Nuremberg but sentenced to life in prison as he knew the truth, when he was due to be let out they murdered him
Churchill was an evil twisted bastard
Hitler: The black-haired brown-eyed leader of the blonde-haired blue-eyed obsessed “nazis”.
Nazis: All hell bent on destroying the jews, but all related to jews by marriage or birth,
Churchill: A gay jew-boy who declared war and therefore was the one who started it all by definition.
Joseph Mengele: The comic butcher of auschwitz who retired to brazil to grow coffee.
Jews: Master scriptwriters who also penned such classics as “9/11 where are you?” and “Humpty Dumpty Trumpty”.
Anne Frank: Ghostwriter for her father Otto’s memoirs,
The holocaust: Proof that six million into one doesn’t go.
History: How to make a mountain of satire out of a molehill of manure.
re- the headline.
WE KNOW.
Just as WE KNOW the government are behind the present invasion since 1948.
Britain is warning its people to stock up on food amid the threat of the climate crisis and hostile states. Rational people here know there is no climate crisis, the biggest threat to us is an economic collapse worse than 1929 because of greedy b*st*rds and WE are part of the hostile states.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/uk-warn-citizens-stock-food-165508405.html
churchill was caught and rothschild agents said we have the bribe or the blackmail
you work for us we pay you
you refuse and its blackmail
churchill was known in parliament as the shithouse
for his initials WC
and also when drunk he would shit his pants
a similar scenatiio was put to Ed ward heath
he was forced to dress up in a german SS uniform
and photographed, and he took us into europe under very unfavourable conditions
that photo was still in the MI 5 library in the 70s
Ah the truth comes dripping slow. So if the war was started by the buffoon Churchill, what else have we been told about that is not true. The holohoax maybe????
” It was England that declared war on Germany on September 3, 1939, two days after Germany invaded Poland.”
Yes but when Stalin invaded Eastern Poland two weeks later, England did NOT declare war on the USSR. Why??? Maybe, like Stalin, Churchill was also a jew and both were working for the jew world order.
Sounds exactly like my book ‘How Britain Initiated both World Wars’
If we declared war on Germany for invading Poland, why didn’t we also declare war on the Soviet Union, which also invaded Poland?
Instead, in an incredibly cynical move, we joined with Soviets to destroy Germany. What a fuckin joke. Churchill the fat drunken Jew monstrosity. Burn in hell you cunt.
Nothing is ever what it seems.
I see similarities today with the Russia and Ukraine conflict. I suppose Britain is expecting Russia to fall just like Germany did. I hope Mr Whitney can put a bit more history together and tell us why he thinks Germany invaded the Soviet Union.
Why did Germany invade the Soviet Union?
ChatGPT said:
Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 for a combination of ideological, strategic, and economic reasons. The invasion was called Operation Barbarossa.
1. Hitler wanted to conquer “Lebensraum”
A central part of Adolf Hitler’s ideology was the idea that Germany needed more territory—especially in Eastern Europe—to provide “living space” (Lebensraum) for Germans.
Hitler envisioned conquering huge areas of the Soviet Union, displacing, enslaving, or killing much of the local population, and settling Germans there.
2. Hitler hated communism
Nazi ideology viewed Soviet communism as a mortal enemy. Hitler saw the Soviet Union as both a political and ideological threat and believed Germany had to destroy the Soviet state.
This wasn’t merely a strategic war: the Nazis conceived the invasion as an ideological and racial war.
3. Germany wanted Soviet resources
The Soviet Union possessed enormous supplies of resources that Germany needed, including:
Oil, particularly from the Caucasus
Grain from Ukraine
Coal and other minerals
Industrial capacity and agricultural land
Germany was already fighting Britain and was concerned about its ability to sustain a long war. Capturing Soviet resources could, Hitler believed, make Germany economically self-sufficient and capable of defeating its enemies.
4. Hitler underestimated the Soviet Union
Hitler believed the Soviet Union was militarily weak. The 1937–38 purges had removed many experienced Soviet officers, and the Red Army had performed poorly against Finland in the Winter War.
Hitler therefore expected the Soviet Union to collapse quickly—possibly within a few months.
That calculation proved catastrophically wrong.
5. Hitler wanted to eliminate Britain’s potential ally
Britain was still fighting Germany after the fall of France in 1940. Hitler believed that Britain continued fighting partly because it hoped that the Soviet Union or the United States might eventually enter the war against Germany.
By destroying the Soviet Union, Hitler hoped to remove one potential enemy and convince Britain that continuing the war was hopeless.
6. The Nazi-Soviet Pact was only temporary
An important point is that Germany and the Soviet Union had actually signed a non-aggression pact in 1939. They even cooperated economically for a time.
But Hitler never regarded this as a permanent partnership. The pact gave Germany time to deal with Poland and Western Europe while avoiding an immediate two-front war.
By 1941, Hitler decided the time had come to attack.
What happened?
On June 22, 1941, Germany and its Axis allies launched the invasion with roughly three million Axis troops. Initially, the Germans advanced enormously quickly, capturing or killing huge numbers of Soviet troops.
But the Soviet Union did not collapse.
The Germans eventually became bogged down by Soviet resistance, enormous distances, logistical problems, fierce fighting, and the failure to capture Moscow. The invasion ultimately became a disastrous war of attrition for Germany.
In short: Hitler invaded the Soviet Union because he wanted its land, resources, and population for a German empire in Eastern Europe, while destroying the communist regime he considered Germany’s ideological enemy. He also believed the Soviet Union would be much easier to defeat than it actually was.
______________________________________________
I would like to get another take on this with an AI platform associated with Proton email. I will probably sign up for a free account in a day or two.
Looks like what Mr Whitney has put together thus far looks and sounds credible.
Seems like the ww2 narrative of the “plucky Bwitish fighting for Fweedom & Demococrazy”is unravelling… doesn’t it???
Discuss.
Michael Irving says almost the same thing. Using original English and German documents, he proved Churchill was a drunk, a very bad one, and that he was bought and paid for by anti-anti-semitic bonkers and financiers who sought economic destruction of Germany for competitive reasons. Churchill, we might note, was the daughter of an anti-anti semitic US lumber baron, which, if we maintain the definition of tribes, was in fact an pro-semite himself. We’ve been had, folks, from every direction and in every way. Now for a remedy?
Michael Irving says almost the same thing. Using original English and German documents, he proved Churchill was a drunk, a very bad one, and that he was bought and paid for by anti-anti-semitic bonkers and financiers who sought economic destruction of Germany for competitive reasons. Churchill’s mother, we might note, was the daughter of an anti-anti semitic US lumber baron, which, if we maintain the definition of tribes, was in fact an pro-semite himself. We’ve been had, folks, from every direction and in every way. Now for a remedy?
Well…this is just wonderful news.
Suggested alternate title:
“NEVERMIND!:
It has long been known that Churchill, whose political career was bolstered by Jewish money in the nineteen thirties, was basically told that in return for this support he was expected to make war on Germany. This is exactly what happened and Europe is paying a horrific price today for that blunder. As Hitler said in April 1945, that neither he nor anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939.
in ww 2 Churchill ordered all children to be taken to homes in the country
these kids were called evacuees folk thought this a bit strange
but Hitler did the same 300,000 german children were sent to the undefended dormitory town of Dresden Arthur harris got the blame for what happened but sefton delmar
said it was Rothschilds idea to churchill to mass firebomb dresden to burn all the kids
The old testament talks of passing the first born child through the fire
to the jews god moloch, who is venerated at bilderberg ceremonies
so the german children were a sacrifice
can you imagine anything more vile ?
i read something on this website years ago and have never forgotten it
see below
The Haunted Airfield
by T Stokes | Dec 27, 2009
The WWII airfield at R.A.F. Bircham Newton in rural England has long been a focus for students of the paranormal and spiritualist mediums on a mission to help and heal.
The part of the airfield where even sceptics hear voices and the sound of phantom aircraft is now the site of tennis courts and it is here most paranormal activity occurs. So it was here that we focused our attention.
Setting up the machinery of paranormal research inevitably attracts attention and we soon had the obligatory bunch of jokers mocking our efforts.
The words of Horace Walpole came to mind: ”The world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel”. And it was into the world of feelings that we were to enter.
Ghosts fall roughly into two categories. The first are those where the emotions of the past are impressed into the ether; like mindless recordings they play on endlessly repeating.
Then there are those that are alive to their surroundings but trapped in time and it was these that we wished to communicate with.
To be precise we wanted to find out why they were seemingly trapped and why they wouldn’t accept help to pass on.
In order to gain a verifiable record, we had with us the paraphernalia of Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) research. Plus we had some Ministry of Defence scanning devices not normally available to investigators, which meant we could snatch whole conversations from the past.
The British government has consistently denied using mediums and psychics during WWII and due to the negligence of Winston Churchill, whole intelligence departments ended up being run by Soviet agents. As a result a lot of PSY research with contributions from British psychics ended up in Soviet intelligence files, thanks to people like Vasili Mitrikhin, Oleg Bzorski and Oleg Kalugin. i can share this
In fact the British agent Peter Wright of “ Spy catcher” fame, spoke of the possibilities of EVP reclaiming voices of the dead from the British embassy roof during the troubles in Cyprus.
Wright also experimented on EVP from his home in Essex. Yet although a true patriot he was cheated out of his pension by the very government he served, while the Soviet defector Anatole Vrinisky described him as an electronics genius who was greatly feared in Moscow.
We stood about for quite some time on the windy tennis courts and the shouts and comments of the dead airmen amazed us and explained why they wouldn’t move on to the next world until they had their say.
All gave their names and rank but one airman acted as spokesman for the others and what he said really shook us.
With an emotional voice the airman told us that these bomber crews had been targeting not enemy soldiers but dormitory towns, where German soldiers families lived. These towns were largely undefended against attack because they had no obvious military value, at least not to any sane person.
However Winston Churchill thought otherwise and he ordered mass fire bombing, not of the Germany army, but of their families children and homes.
Moreover Churchill had refused German peace offers, as he and his sponsors wanted Germany’s complete destruction, referring to it many times as “total war”.
This airman’s spirit told us that one cold and noisy bombing run, he suddenly found himself with other British airmen, in a pushing throng of women and children, making for a large staircase that arose up to where he could not see. He saw a mother trying to carry two injured children and on offering to carry one was shocked to see and smell, the child’s burned flesh.
It was at this point that he realised that although he spoke no German, he could understand every word spoken, and on turning to his comrades he suddenly knew that they were all dead.
Gone was any feeling of enmity the airmen might have once felt for the Germans. Instead they all helped the women and children reach the stair but almost to a man decided to remain behind themselves.
These men are both trapped and guilt ridden, they see themselves as war criminals, who signed up to fight soldiers, not the wives and children of soldiers.
Their anger after all these years was still palpable. Asked if they wish for help to progress on, almost to a man they said they did not. One airman with a Scots accent said it is justice for the dead that they waited for and please to tell their families they were all O. K.
We read for them the address of Canon Henry Scott –Holland, once dean of St. Paul’s:
“Death is nothing at all, I have only slipped away into the next room, I am I and you are you. Whatever we were to each other that we are still. Call me by my old familiar name; speak to me in the easy way you always used. Put no difference into your tone; wear no forced air of solemnity or sorrow…what is this death but a negligible accident? Why should I be out of mind because I am out of sight? I am waiting for you, for an interval, somewhere very near just around the corner. All is well.”
Further reading:
Falsehoods in wartime by A. Ponsonby
Churchill’s War-David Irving
From Admiral to cabin boy by Barry Domville
Was the wartime bombing of civilians, a necessity or a crime? A.C Grayling
The Nameless War –Captain Archibald Maule Ramsey
Unfortunately the Churchill papers have been so altered and sanitised as to be virtually worthless.
T. Stokes lecturer in paranormal studies. 2002
The problem which gave rise to fascism in Europe, including that in Italy, Spain, and Nazism in Germany was the advent and spreading of communism, which history clearly tells was not from the Russians, but from the Jews, and especially by and mainly through international Jewry. The Rothschild dynasty whose octopus tentacles had taken control of the British Empire and its aristocracy in the 19th century, by the end of that century was in total financial control of the US, and was busy very planning the overthrow of the Tzars in Russia – after a failed attempts even before their 1905 attempted communist revolution in that nation.
If anyone thinks today that the actions of Israel are unconscionable and beyond any limits of moral decency, they have also to wake up and realize that Israel like the USSR, and the PRC all were Rothschild prodigy regimes, and the totally RUTHLESS and TOTALITARIAN methods in bringing about those very EVIL regimes were EXATLY the same methods which that same dynasty used to USURP their controls over the British Empire, US and Europe.
From the point of view of international Jewry, any goal and any methods to achieve their goals, no matter how evil from any humanist or Christian perspective, is entirely KOSHER. They, in fact, do not share the same moral standards as the rest of us, and they do regard all non-Jews as subhuman, just like the Nazis who were a carbon copy of Zionism and regarded all “non-Arians” as subhuman,. What their actions over the past 200 years and beyond ought to spell out is that they in their me-first exclusiveness and their moral exceptionalism have no right to own and control what they do, and most certainly have no right to own and control ANY of our nations. What they have they have largely USURPED.
But what do we do? We sit here like dolts, like we are in fact subhuman, trying to decide whom between Hitler and Churchill was the lesser of evils. WWI was most certainly carried on by international Jewry led by the Rothschild’s, after the Germans in 1916 (who were winning that war at the time) offered a fair peace with each nation returning to their pre-war borders. It was that same Jewish money power which induced the UK to rejecting the offer and carrying on with the war, based on the promise of bringing the US into that war, a nation which the stinkers in fact controlled hook, line and sinker.
If you want history which is true then you have to be open to the facts of history and that is one of them. And no, the Jews did not just want Palestine as they claim in exchange for bringing the US into the war. They mainly WANTED that war to continue beyond 1916 because that war had drained Russia and together with their own destabilizing efforts against the Tzar, they knew that if the war ended in 1916 their plans to overthrown the Tsar and set up a communist regime would fail. Russia also needed that war to end so that it could with the help of the West rebuild its economy. That was the crux of the issue for international Jewry and the principal reason they were so keen on carrying on that war.
You may think that is simply historical theory, or conspiracy theory and that geopolitics just happens, and if you do you they are likely an ignorant evolutionist where you think things like that “just happen” with no one in control, and certainly not any vast money power, and all without the planning of the richest people on the face of the earth. However, for the 20th century that most certainly is not the case.
Communism came out of the bowels of Judaism in its unconverted state having gone astray in an exclusive “I/Thou” and “me-first” relationship giving them a voracious entitlement complex over virtually everything of value. You may ask how then could such an atheistic creed of communism which prohibits private ownership, and advocates an equality of all classes of people, come from Judaism, which would seem to be the very opposite based on its exclusive ethic tribal class system? Ask the Rothschild’s. Are they not Jewish? Or is that like asking these days if the Pope is Catholic. Are they really “Jewish”. Or is it the case that in you are a Jew by birth and you reject the pursuit of God spiritually for materialism and mammon as the fulfillment of the Jewish destiny, that subjecting the world first to communism and stripping away the power of all rivals that that is the way to global domination- iff you have the money power.
We have to ask if the polarity between communism and capitalism was not a grand dialectic designed in the bowels of some Rothschild castle, hatching all of the major wars and conflicts of the 20th century, in order to milk all of the nations of the world according to the misconstrued prophecy in the Book Isaiah that “the wealth of the nations will come to you”.
It establishing Bolshevik communism in Russia, most of the top people in control were Jews. Their abuses to the Christians in the Ukraine caused a lasting hatred. The funding to start communism in Russia and to keep the communist regime in power was from Jewish sources. Even after the revolution the USSR was kept afloat through Jewish control of our financial systems and our governments, even through the so-called “Cold War”. Even before that revolution was wrapped up in about 1922, atheistic communism with the backing of the same sources was spreading the threat all through Europe, and despite what the “official narratives” say, fascism was an organized reaction of mainly non-Jewish old money, old “class”, not controlled by the Jews, which they wanted to wipe out, just as they did in Russia, and what they are now doing in the Middle East.
Force is justified in self protection from an aggressor in the morality of all major Christian denominations. As for Franco what his government in Spain did in the 1930’s to repress and answer the atrocities of the communists may in our day appear as excessive. However, in war it is not truth which is the first causality but morality in general. Buchannan, Franco was a “devout Catholic” and that did account for him showing far more restraint than what Hitler ended up doing in Germany. Both Mussolini and Hitler had abandoned their childhood faiths and became much like the communists, throwing their moral restraints to the winds. Yet, each nation was under attack by the Rothschild-backed communists.
As Buchannan says in the video, Hitler was Satanic and evil. Churchill may have been just as evil. He was not Jewish despite the rumors, but he likely was very much under the thumb of the Rothschild dynasty with its fingers in every pie. The English deal with Poland in 1939 was likely a pretext to start WWII, which was actually an extension of WWI, with the Germans rising up again after blaming the treachery of international Jewry for the continuation of that war, the huge loss of life, and the subsequent bankruptcy of their nation as a consequence.
Yet, to fight communism and take out what was believed at the time to be its source in the heart of the USSR, was the principle motivation of so-called “devote” but also corrupt Catholics such as Joseph Kennedy. Had our governments been free of Rothschild and international Jewry controls, they would have simply frozen all of their assets, and forced the USSR and the entire communist movement into the dust heap of history. However, none of our governments were free of those controls. Our leaders like Churchill were “owned”. Yet, it was mainly the Catholic “old money” in Europe and in the US, making common cause with the Arian myth-minded and Satanic Adolf Hitler – as if one evil power could be used to fight and vanquish another. The thinking may even have been at the time on the Continent that the ends justify the means, and that only by utilizing the most ruthless methods, with Christian morality being suspended, that the anti-Christ beast of communism could be defeated. It was much the same way of thinking as the anti-Christ communists and the anti-Christ Jews. Most certainly to call the 20th theme of the entire 20th century “Life without God” would be quite apt because everything which has come down upon us from the ruling materialistic money-grubbing top-down order, be it from Jews or non-Jews, testifies to that theme.
Britain, however, at the beginning of WWII was like the US and completely controlled by the Jewish money power, and despite fighting Nazism while supporting communism (certainly doing nothing very much to prevent its spread), at least could see that if the Germans did conquer Russia, they would likely end up controlling Asia and the world. At that time in the 1930’s the British ruling class was still very much imbued with the thinking of Sir Halford Mackinder, the creator of the “Heartland Theory”, together with the thinking of Sir Olaf Caroe, who coined the idea the “Great Game”. The geopolitical and military thinking was basically that the control of Russia by Germany would the end of the British Empire anyway. Because of Jewish money power in control of the USSR, the USA and the UK, anyway it can be said that it was Nazim and Fascism which were greater threats to their interests than any communist threat, and in any case because of those connections they were indeed bound to the Rothschild plans and not those of outside interests. Had they been more free of those controls, there likely never would have been a Hitler or a WWII.
The UK, England, that is the f—ing stupid Brits, started WW1 and WW2!
And now, with Bojo, and his handlers, WW3!
Why?
The fake Jews wanted it
A ‘tyrant and a monster’ would not have modest goals nor engage in generous negotiations.. Hitler was the only man of his day who clearly understood the Big Picture and had the personal power to mobilize his nation against its enemy (and ours).
Ww2 had nothing to do with ‘good vs evil’- it had everything to do with ignorant evil joining the ranks of evil and it’s not over yet.
Around the same time Tucker Carlson had Darryl Cooper on there was a lot of other stuff about Churchill on Bitchute. One such thing was a David Irving lecture about him. I got curious to see if I could learn something new about the fat jewish bastard and I did. I didn’t know he had planned to use anthrax against Germany at the end of the war. If it had happened it would also have made surrounding countries uninhabitale to this very day. I wonder if Victor took fatso in the ear. Afraid to loose all the family assets perhaps with such an overkill?
The articles begins with talk of “for all of Churchill’s triumphs and successes….” This is in fact wrong, the triumphs and successes were all myth and entirely for his own benefit at the cost of damage and death for millions of others,
Despite his ruthlessness -the hallmark of all psychopaths , Churchill was vain, utterly incompetent, easily bored, devious and totally narcissistic. The typical ghastly spoiled, bullying child whose repugnant behaviour was matched by his belligerence and attention whoring.
Completely untrustworthy both to personal friends, family and political allies or patrons. He used his considerable wealth and insatiable capacity for lying to push himself forward on every occasion and to run away from responsibility when needed. Changing political party overnight he moved from Tory to Liberal as he saw the latter as the best vehicle for his interests . Once in government he pushed himself forward by endless mendacity and intriguing to key positions in govt. Home Secretary, he became bored with the post then at the Admiralty on the outbreak of war in 1914. Utterly inept in this task the Royal Navy suffered severe losses, then the ridiculous Gallipoli campaign which even if it succeeded it would not have altered the course of the war. Churchill was besotted by it and pressed on despite advice to the contrary, after huge losses Britain and its Dominions are forced to retreat back to Britain, zero gain, huge piles of corpses. He then pretended to go back to the Army and the Front but all the time scheming for a comeback-which happened in 1916 minister for munitions. After the war he swapped back to the Tories and became finance minister, a total disaster for Britain’s ailing economy and yet another example of his arrogant bullying way. His attitudes to India and Ireland bordered on the xenophobic.
Much of this BS and bullishness was due to being a total alcoholic, and there are few liars like a drunk, cunning with it. Unprincipled and basically superficial, his domineering loutish behaviour attached itself to promoting the abortion of any peace movement in the 1930s. Germany was once again The Threat, all energy must be put into building up for another war- identical to today’s EU/NATO regime which holds Russia responsible for all evil and that the ‘Threat’ must be attacked as soon as viable. Just indoctrinate your populace first as to its inevitability and desirability. Autocracy, something Churchill worshipped , the Divine Right of Shites.
During WW2 Churchill was Amerika’s glove puppet and despised by most US leaders and military men, who openly scorned his delusions of grandeur, insane military projects and tendency to bore and lecture people ad nauseam. Yet Amerika used Churchill just as they had used Lloyd George in WW 1 to bleed the country of monetary power, assets, credibility, eliminate any rival and any autonomy. Churchill and the elites colluded with this, Britain was bankrupted and forced under American control and occupation. They, the Americans laugh at the Special Relationship a pathetic conceit, it is nothing other than an outmoded Dysfunctional Relationship which Amerika has now expanded to the captive EU states.
Much is made in British history of the ‘miracle’ of Dunkerque. No question there was bravery and resolve by individuals. But Churchill caused it by his constant meddling with military strategy, inteference with generals and ordering Gen.Gort to break off contact with the Germans thus betraying their French ally and leaving them in an impossible position. Simply put, they ran away from their allies. Fled to Britain and Churchill then ordered the French to go on fighting come what may…another triumph of mendacity painted as a victory-of sorts, the myth began.
What should be asked, rather than did Churchill ignite the war (likely) or Hitler, is WHY did Hitler not finish off his adversary at the time? Why did he let them escape and live on to resist and thus inevitably draw in allies such as USA and USSR guaranteeing Germany’s obliteration? The stock answer is that Hitler is said to admire Britain, very little proof of this-he thought its ruling class and royal family effete and contemptible. Probably he conceitedly believed that peace feelers would emerge from Britain in the summer of 1940. They probably did and more than likely Churchill eyed them opportunistically for a while, but all of it was suppressed by the secret services after it was decided that fighting on was better. Not from a moral point of view, a peace treaty would have exiled Churchill from the political drug he craved, forever. The activities of the royal family are likely to have been suspect too at this time. Very likely Hitler would have demanded their exile too and a second commonwealth in a similar style to Cromwell’s being introduced, a parliamentary republic. Not acceptable to the Anglo-Saxon viewpoint.
Had this happened Britain would not have become an Amerikan colony, America would not have been able to get into the continental war at all. Hitler handed this to them by stupidly declaring war on the USA in 1942. Possibly Hitler would not have had to attack the USSR at all, ‘arrangements’ would have been made? if, if, if. By failing to deal with Britain Hitler sealed his fate and more importantly, Germany’s. It fostered the Churchill Myth. Churchill boasted in true sociopath fashion, I will write the history and history will be kind to me. Fawningly kind unless you look at the late Clive Ponting’s acerbic biography of the fraud. Churchill was even installed again as PM in Britain and clung to power 1951-55 despite being obviously senile and incapable.
I want to destroy and pollute everything I control… Personal success and triumph: national and ethical disgrace and humiliation.
1 kike can destroy a country…
(or empire)
Germany is rising…
where you gonna hide now jewboy?
yes Hitler wanted an united white Europa like
we have now but not with this corruptos we
have now .
Churchill was a monster . this happens when a
scholar of british educative institutes got raped
by older bullyboys + gets no help from his mother .
all for Britains Glory ? his compagnon in intriges
FD Roosevelt was not better . they are all guilty
criminals against humanity . one can say correctly
Pederasty is a typical british disease . contagion
from Lords down to the lower.
also in the freemasonry !
share interest in ?
anteilnahme
@ STEPHEN
also today the germans dont want war with russia but
first the jew steered medias + our atlantic thinktanks
steered politicians + the terrorist behaviors of ukraines
secret murdergang keep us silent . we are not interested
if corrupt jewnest ukraine belongs to europa as steady
criminal gangster mafia empire or if it belongs to mother
russia as for over 500 years . they just only need to learn
to live with their russian neighbours . we also have to
learn to live with africans, islam + all kinds our traitors
here are inviting .
arfter the war + food shortage most german
farmers had the problem of fighting the
potato beetles + knew that alliied airplanes
threw them (or the worms) from sky .
Morgenthau Plan . I remember the kids were
payed by the farmers to collect them in masses
in marmelade glases .
@ JAMESBALDERSON
I am sure the Israeli bomberpilots on Gaza will
sit on right side of their idol : DEMON
ABRAHAM-MOLOCH-MOHAMMED UNITED
they dont need to haunt as ghosts since they have
no conscience about their deeds contrary to your
mentioned british dead pilots.
leesvoer.
*https://lovkap.blogspot.com/