1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Commentary
  4.  » How Many Wars One Has to Lose to Stop Being Called “The Greatest Military in the World”?

The wreckage of a U.S. E-3 after being hit on the ground by Iranian drones

Hua Bin – The Unz Review Aug 14, 2026

It makes my skin crawl whenever I hear someone recite the mantra – “the US has the greatest military in the history of the world”.

I know you have heard the same “truism” before.

Obviously, such “American patriots” have never heard of Genghis Khan.

The Mongols conquered most of Eurasia in the 13th century and put together the largest contiguous land empire in history.

They seldom lost a battle in the process.

The cheerleaders of the US war machine seem also unaware that German Wehrmacht was probably the deadliest military in the world in 1940 or the Soviet Red Army in 1945.

The pinnacle for US military power was the Desert Storm campaign against Saddam Hussein in 1991.

But it was 35 years ago.

The US has lost pretty much every major war since then.

I wouldn’t care to call the Venezuela snatch job either war or major. Wars usually involve your enemy fighting back.

Before the Desert Storm, the US also lost its last major war in Vietnam.

So, the Desert Storm is basically bookended by defeats. It is the exception that proves the rule.

In short, calling the US military the “greatest” is a hyperbole that has little empirical data to back up.

Perhaps a bit hard to swallow for those allergic to truth but it is what it is.

Statistically, there is no doubt the US military is the most expensive in the history of the world. But with a mixed record of effectiveness, if one is charitable.

I’m no doctor but it is clear anyone who claims the US military is the GOAT would medically benefit from a frontal lobotomy.

For the Iran war, the US’s latest adventure, Trump has been getting a shitstorm of criticism.

No argument that Trump is an ignorant and malignant doofus who was baited by the Jews and is guilty of launching a criminal war.

But let’s be fair – he was an idiot for starting the war, but it is the US military that has lost it on the battlefield.

The much-touted US war machine has simply failed to achieve victory, period.

I wrote an essay in mid-March, three weeks after the surprise attack, and titled it “Iran has already won”. https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/iran-has-already-won

Back then, I was referring to Iran’s pending strategic victory of leveraging the Hormuz to defeat US war goals.

But things have gone farther than my predictions.

At this point, one can argue – with a strong case – the Pentagon has militarily lost the war.

It has dropped a lot of bombs and killed many but has failed to achieve any tangible success on the battlefields.

Unless its war objective is to hand Tehran control over Hormuz and make it the dominant regional power. Wink wink.

The failure in Iran has exposed the US military is truly a “paper tiger”, as Chairman Mao observed more than half a century ago.

Defining military victory

Chairman Mao wrote that “politics is war without bloodshed, while war is politics with bloodshed.”

Carl von Clausewitz said that war is an extension of politics.

Textbooks define “military victory” as: translating battlefield success into enduring political outcomes.

It requires not just defeating an enemy’s armed forces, but compelling that adversary to accept a permanent shift in political will and establishing a favorable post-conflict order.

By that measure, the US has failed miserably and totally – it didn’t defeat Iran’s army; the shift in its political will is to become more anti-USrael; and the war established a less favorable post-conflict order for the US, with Iran securing de facto control over Gulf oil supply.

Some argue that USrael achieved tactical/operational victory over Iran since they destroyed much of Iranian air defense and navy, killed its political and military leaders, and caused severe economic and humanitarian hardship.

They are wrong even on that account.

This line of argument is equivalent to a boxer claiming victory in the middle rounds because they landed more hits, ignoring the fact that their opponent is still standing and actively fighting back.

In the theater of war, just as in the ring, absorbing massive punishment but delivering the final, paralyzing counter-punch—or simply outlasting the opponent’s stamina until they want out—is the definition of winning.

Iran has effectively used a rope-a-dope strategy by absorbing the initial strikes from USrael while preserving its most lethal asset – the ability to choke global energy at the Strait of Hormuz.

Furthermore, Iran has used asymmetrical warfare with drones and missiles to achieve horizontal escalation dominance against the USrael targets across the Gulf region.

Iran has denied the enemies their political goals and forced the US to sue for peace.

It has defended its sovereignty and is dictating the endgame – the definition of success.

Iran’s success is not only at the strategic level. Even at a tactical level, Iran has prevailed as it has destroyed far more high-value US military assets than it has lost.

These include strategic early warning radars, fighter jets, AWACs, refueling tankers, ISR drones, and nearly all US bases in the region.

Iran has also exhausted much of US offensive and defensive arsenal, significantly reducing its capability to continue the fight or wage wars elsewhere.

Even the Trump regime now realizes it will almost certainly lose any war of attrition if a prolonged conflict ensues.

Most importantly, Iran has shown the world the US military is hardly an indominable power when confronted with a committed opponent willing and able to fight back.

The US military has lost fair and square

1) It has used all its power to wage a destructive war but just couldn’t win

Winning is the result of both intent and capability.

No one can claim the US military has lacked the “intent”.

It has thrown everything it has at Iran, including unproven military AI technology such as the Palantir Maven system which resulted in the massacre of 168 innocent school girls on the first day of the war.

The US has held back nothing, short of nuclear bombs.

I wrote about how the US has thrown the “kitchen sink” but to no avail in another earlier essay.

The US War Machine Underwhelms – part 1