The American Major Alexander Seversky observed the aftermath of Hiroshima and said:
“In Hiroshima, I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan. There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima’s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright. It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive. I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects. At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb,
I looked for the “bald spot” where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn’t there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena. What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities. The concrete buildings nearest to the centre of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled.
The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual. Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima’s ten-story press building, about three blocks from the centre of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.”
***
No Hiroshima atom bomb then no “nukes”. No nukes then no “tactical nukes”.
Tony O'Neill
on August 13, 2026 at 8:54 am
Scott Ritter — yet another “believer” in “new clear” weapons.
Question Scott: What happened to the famous “new clear” fallout that, according to the “science”, should persist for generations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Ha Ha Ha “new clear” bombs — yet another scare story like the “cold war” etc. etc. etc. It goes on and on.
Hey Scott, here’s another one for you: When Germany was forced to invade Western Poland in 1938 the all-lies, England and France, declared war on Germany. Two weeks later Stalin invaded Eastern Poland but the all-lies DID NOT declare war on the USSR !!!!
“Go figure” – as the yankees say 🙂 La di da, la did da 🙂
GBL
on August 13, 2026 at 11:28 am
When ever some one brings up the “nuke” option we know the guy is a bullshitter. Like Scott (and Larry, and Larry, and the other former military and intellegence people) . You cannot believe anything this guy says. There are no nukes, never have been, always a myth and a con . A fraud.
antiJHWH
on August 13, 2026 at 6:42 pm
that they even suggest using nukes is absolutely
satanic . all the scientists, polticians, military
(especialy every coward bomber pilot on civilians)
involved are the dirt of the earth ! DIRT DIRT DIRT !
it proves : every nation in danger of mafia bullying
by its enemies has a natural right to have their own nukes !
it is the sting of the scorpion (or sting ray)
antiJHWH
on August 13, 2026 at 11:19 pm
seems the above NO nukers must have a hidden
(CIA,Mossad?) agenda to keep the average
sleepy sheep in their dreams . every science +
jewish false flag history speaks against them,
also the deliberate Helium 3 shortage .
The American Major Alexander Seversky observed the aftermath of Hiroshima and said:
“In Hiroshima, I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan. There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima’s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright. It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive. I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects. At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb,
I looked for the “bald spot” where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn’t there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena. What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities. The concrete buildings nearest to the centre of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled.
The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual. Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima’s ten-story press building, about three blocks from the centre of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.”
***
No Hiroshima atom bomb then no “nukes”. No nukes then no “tactical nukes”.
Scott Ritter — yet another “believer” in “new clear” weapons.
Question Scott: What happened to the famous “new clear” fallout that, according to the “science”, should persist for generations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Ha Ha Ha “new clear” bombs — yet another scare story like the “cold war” etc. etc. etc. It goes on and on.
Hey Scott, here’s another one for you: When Germany was forced to invade Western Poland in 1938 the all-lies, England and France, declared war on Germany. Two weeks later Stalin invaded Eastern Poland but the all-lies DID NOT declare war on the USSR !!!!
“Go figure” – as the yankees say 🙂 La di da, la did da 🙂
When ever some one brings up the “nuke” option we know the guy is a bullshitter. Like Scott (and Larry, and Larry, and the other former military and intellegence people) . You cannot believe anything this guy says. There are no nukes, never have been, always a myth and a con . A fraud.
that they even suggest using nukes is absolutely
satanic . all the scientists, polticians, military
(especialy every coward bomber pilot on civilians)
involved are the dirt of the earth ! DIRT DIRT DIRT !
it proves : every nation in danger of mafia bullying
by its enemies has a natural right to have their own nukes !
it is the sting of the scorpion (or sting ray)
seems the above NO nukers must have a hidden
(CIA,Mossad?) agenda to keep the average
sleepy sheep in their dreams . every science +
jewish false flag history speaks against them,
also the deliberate Helium 3 shortage .