Lipton Matthews – The Daily Sceptic Aug 1, 2026
The history of the transatlantic slave trade refuses to settle into a single, agreed-upon narrative. Each generation of scholars returns to the archive and finds something the last generation missed, and the argument over who profited, who suffered, and who held the reins of the trade continues without resolution. David Eltis and Stanley Engerman have long pushed back against the claim that the profits of the slave trade financed England’s industrial takeoff, arguing that the sums involved were too modest to have driven a transformation of that scale. Their intervention reoriented much of the debate toward Europe’s balance sheet. Yet in redirecting attention to whether Britain grew rich from slavery, the literature has left curiously underexplored a parallel and equally important question: how African rulers, merchants and chiefs profited from the trade, and how thoroughly they controlled its terms. That question deserves equal weight, and the evidence emphatically dismantles the old image of Africans as passive suppliers caught in a system designed and run from Europe.
Africans, not Europeans, determined the conditions under which the trade operated. Slavery and the long-distance trade in captives were nothing new to the continent. Trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean networks in human beings had moved people for centuries before a single European ship appeared off the coast. European buyers wanted slaves badly, but wanting was not the same as getting. Early attempts by Europeans to seize captives by force were consistently repelled, which meant that for the entire duration of the trade, Europeans were reduced to purchasing from African suppliers on terms those suppliers established, since no European power possessed the military strength to compel African participation in any transaction its rulers did not sanction. The economics of the 18th Century sharpen this point considerably. As demand for slaves surged with the spread of New World plantation agriculture, prices paid to African suppliers climbed accordingly and by 1700 the value of the slave trade in Atlantic Africa had come to outweigh the trade in all other commodities combined, with the price of slaves tripling over the course of the 18th Century.
Rather than being squeezed by this surge in European demand, African kings and merchants didn’t just absorb the Atlantic trade’s expansion; they tightened their grip on it and claimed a growing share of its profits. This dynamic held even once the volume of European manufactured imports rose substantially, since Western goods did not attain sufficient presence to disrupt local African production before the 19th Century. Indigenous textile production continued to thrive well into the 19th Century notwithstanding the rising inflows of Indian and later Manchester cloths. Furthermore, African smelters produced iron of such quality that it gave them a keen advantage over imports in West Africa even during the 20th Century. None of this fits comfortably with a picture of African societies as economically subordinate. It fits far better with a picture of shrewd, adaptive elites steering a lucrative trade to their own advantage across four centuries, absorbing and redirecting European commercial pressure rather than buckling under it.
Interestingly, documentary evidence from company ledgers turns this general argument into hard, quantifiable numbers. A meticulous reconstruction of the Royal African Company’s payments to Gold Coast chiefs between 1679 and 1704, drawn from more than 20,000 individual entries in the Company’s own journals, shows that African elites did not merely tolerate European traders on the coast – they extracted enormous and steadily growing wealth from them as the price of doing business in their territory.
The scale of these payments is difficult to overstate. The total value of payments made to African elites was 17 times as much as a typical Company agent’s salary, and taking into account that the Company employed between six and 10 agents across its African forts and factories during this period, the total value of payments was still about twice as much as the combined salary of 10 agents serving the Company on the Gold Coast. Measured against African incomes rather than European ones, the disparity is just as striking: the total value of payments was 201 times as much as the yearly allowance of an African labourer, and 50 times as much as that of a skilled craftsman on the Gold Coast.
This wealth did not spread evenly among African recipients. Head chiefs – meaning kings, queens and princes – absorbed the largest share of it, receiving 62% of the total value of all recorded payments, while chieftains and officeholders divided most of the remainder between them. Once the Royal African Company’s monopoly weakened after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and rival English merchants began contesting the same trade routes, the position of these head chiefs improved further still, their share of total payments climbing from 33% before 1688 to 67% afterwards.
What stands out just as strongly is the degree to which European suppliers tailored their offerings to African preference rather than the reverse. Chiefs received finer imported cloth specifically because they used it to signal authority and prestige, while firearms and alcohol were supplied in quantities and combinations that shifted according to the personal tastes and ceremonial needs of individual rulers – from the brandy favoured over rum at planting festivals to the particular grades of cloth requested for a queen’s court and her attendants. European cloth alone accounted for 46% of the total value of everything paid to African chiefs across the entire period studied, a figure that reflects not European imposition but African demand dictating the assortment.
Nowhere is the asymmetry of bargaining power stated more bluntly than in the moments when chiefs threatened to withhold their cooperation altogether. Company correspondence preserves a case in which a prince, dissatisfied with the monthly sum offered him, warned that he would stop all merchants from coming to the coast and redirect commerce to a rival town unless his demands were met – a threat serious enough that the Company hastily agreed to supply him with scarlet broadcloth and iron on a fixed yearly schedule to keep him satisfied. A separate letter shows a queen making an almost identical demand, insisting on a raised monthly ground rent in exchange for her promise to bar local canoes from carrying goods off to interloping traders who competed with the Company.
These were not isolated incidents but part of a consistent pattern. Payments spiked specifically at settlements positioned along the sub-coast caravan routes – the geographic chokepoints where chiefs held literal power to redirect trade before it ever reached the coast – and these same chiefs saw their share of the Company’s gross income rise from a negligible 0.6% before 1688 to more than 12% afterwards, a jump far steeper than that experienced by chiefs situated elsewhere.
Even the physical infrastructure of the trade underscores African primacy rather than European domination. Every fort a European company built on the coast stood on land an African kingdom had agreed, through negotiated treaty, to lease and sovereignty over that ground never passed into European hands. Permission for construction had to be sought, granted or refused according to local political calculation, and could be reversed entirely at African discretion. The Hueda kingdom governing the port of Ouidah initially refused Europeans any fortified presence whatsoever, confining them instead to unfortified lodges built to local designs and positioned deliberately beside the royal palace itself – an arrangement that let the king observe every European movement directly and impress upon them the extent of his own authority.
Only later did the same kingdom permit fortification, and even then it did so on terms of its own choosing, at one point supplying over 400 labourers to help construct a French fort it had agreed to allow, effectively making the crown a co-investor in the very structure meant to house its European trading partners. African rulers also exercised direct judicial and political authority over Europeans operating within their territory. In certain coastal towns, European governors were granted the right to preside over judicial proceedings only because local elites permitted it, treating them as arbiters rather than sovereigns.
Local kings intervened personally in European affairs as they saw fit – in one instance selecting which official would govern a rival nation’s fort after an uprising, and in another dispatching messengers to accompany English traders seeking permission to settle in a neighbouring kingdom’s territory, effectively vouching for one set of Europeans to another African power. This authority extended to matters of alliance and betrayal as well. When one ruler found himself unable to pay what he owed to English traders, he simply switched his allegiance to the Dutch – an option available to him precisely because no single European power held enough leverage on the coast to prevent it. African kingdoms understood perfectly well that competition among European powers redounded to their own advantage, and they exploited it methodically and by design.
The Hueda permitted English, French and Portuguese forts to be built within roughly 500 metres of one another specifically to guarantee that no single European power could gain enough dominance to dictate terms – a strategy that kept every European tenant dependent on African goodwill and none of them secure enough to act unilaterally. The kingdom went further still, forbidding the Europeans within its borders from fighting one another at all, since any such conflict threatened to disrupt the very trade on which the kingdom’s wealth depended. European companies, meanwhile, found themselves locked into a costly rivalry against each other rather than against Africa, building forts within sight of a competitor’s cannon not because doing so served any independent commercial logic but because failing to match a rival’s presence risked ceding an entire stretch of coastline to it – a pattern of construction that spread steadily along the Gold Coast throughout the early 18th Century without any African kingdom ever losing its underlying authority to grant or withdraw the land itself. African rulers, for their part, simply watched this European rivalry play out and collected the rents, presents and improved terms of trade that came from playing one anxious buyer against another.
What emerges is not a story of Africa acted upon, but of Africa acting. Chiefs and kings did not merely endure four centuries of contact with European traders; they priced it, shaped it and profited from it on their own terms. They dictated the mix and quality of goods they would accept, threatened to redirect trade whenever their demands went unmet, controlled the very ground on which every European fort was permitted to stand, and turned rival European companies against one another to their own advantage. The debate over whether the profits of slavery built the factories of Manchester and Liverpool may never be settled. But there is far less room for doubt about the other side of the Atlantic: African elites did not simply survive the slave trade. They ran a great deal of it, and they were paid accordingly.
Lipton Matthews is a researcher and podcaster. He has worked in the heritage, cultural and sales sectors. His work has been featured in CapX, the Critic, the Federalist, Epoch Times and other publications. He is the author of the book Busting African Delusions.
sell them back to africa
Try telling it to the twats in what used to be britain. “Racist!” will be the reply.
“What should we call our little cherub dear?”
“Mmmm. Let me think… I know! Lipton…”
They must’ve been drinking heavily the night before.
If I’d been sat as an 8yo by the blast doors in a coal mine, & Obviously one of the “not worth a light” poor souls..Apparently a candle was valued at 1d, (a Penny) & that’s all the child’s labour was worth to the Father for a weeks slavery.
They must have dreamed of being lucky enough to be in ‘the colonies’ picking cotton.
Of course they would never have known of such a different reality,
hard to recognize which would have been worse, Being forced up chimneys as a ‘sweep’
or condemned to the work house with your Mother tagged as a whore..
It must have been utter shite being shipped across the Atlantic crammed into a slave ship.
Horrible & Cruel. But.. DON’T POINT THE FINGER AT ME…Grrrr
I’ll go toe to toe with the likes of the Lenny Henry’s of this world demanding reparations,
That ‘cruise’ to the Carinbbean had a time span… but nowhere near the longevity of the kids working in the Wool & Cotton mills, in wretched housing, The outside Shit house * was not an privilage more so in Jan/Feb/March..& those poor souls had to walk to work usually in bare feet on frozen cobble stoned streets. That along with horrific dangerous work conditions that never had an end.
Fuck me. How lucky was that, being press ganged into the Navy, LOL…
Reparations.. Stand in line Jimmy Grant, you’re back of the que, The BRITS come 1st,
& we the more common people are owed big time.
* Our terraced street had Outside toilets in the 1960′.
& or street was what they called ‘Un-adopted’ not having a proper tarmac surface, never mind cobbles. It was granite gravel & cinders.
According to that idiotic tranny cos-playing as the Archdyke of C*nterbury, blacks be blameless!
I call BS on this crap. JEWS profited from the slave trade. It was they who owned the slave ships. It was they who ensured those ships sailed to the US and sold the slaves to plantation owners.
Bu, But, But, imagine you are a plantation owner around 1800. You’ve paid good money to buy slaves — WHOM YOU DEPEND UPON TO WORK YOUR LAND.
Question: Would it be good business practice to abuse those same slaves or treat them well? Need I say more?
The true slavers never gave up on the business. “Israhell” is THE place for sex slaves tricked to go to that shit hole in Occupied Palestine to work as normal workers. Once there their passports are confiscated and they spend the next 20 years servicing deranged jews. This is openly admitted by jews today.
the eastafrican slavetrade existed already before mohammed .
The US https://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/lina-architects-deception.pdf the Masonic Executive Base/ page 188
page 189 “The Jewish masonic elite organized capturing black people in Africa/ transported them to America & controlled every slave market in the US….
That alone the Jewish freemason Aaron Lopez had control of more than half of the combined deals in the Colony of Rhode Island (with Newport) is a well-known fact (“Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade in America”, the Carnegie Institute, Washington”)
He had more than 5% of all dealings with the black people for almost fifty years (1726-1774)…
More than 300 ships owned by the Jews (Isaac Gomez, Hayman Levy, Moses Ben Franks, Isaac Dias, Benjamin Levy & many others),were engaged in the slave trade.
The Jewish agency called Asiento later operating from Holland & England helped Jewish freemasons provide black slaves for the colonists. With the yearly capture + transport of one million black slaves it is not difficult to figure that from 1661 to 1774 (113 years) approximately 110 million slaves had been removed from their native land. About 10 per cent or eleven million black slaves reached the colonies alive.
Each Negro was valued at about 100 gallons of rum/ 100 pounds of gunpowder/ or in cash 18-20 dollars. Later the price was 40 dollars.
The blacks, purchased at the African coast for 20 to 40 dollars ❗️were then resold by the same Jewish masonic slave dealers in America for 2000 dollars. 11 million x 2000 dollars! This gives you an idea how
the Jewish masonic leaders managed to build up tremendous fortunes…
Already from the start fundamentalist Jews were actively involved in spreading freemasonry in America. The Jewish freemason Samuel Oppenheim’s book “The Jews and Masonry in the United States before
1810” (American Jewish Historical Society, 1910) proves this…
Comments https://archive.org/details/documentsillustr01donn/page/6/mode/2up illustrative of the history of the slave trade to America by Donnan, Elizabeth, 1883-1955, editor
page 7/ About 1610 Purchas obtained the story of the adventures of one Andrew Battell…… who had left England in 1589…..> “sent in the south-central coast of Angola, to trade. Here he found an encampment of natives who travelled from Sierra Leone, and with whom he traded: ❗️ “We loaded our ship with slaves in 7 days/ bought them so cheap that many did not cost one real/which were worth in the city of Loando twelve milreis.” …
…Whether or not the papal bulls had prevented an earlier appearance of the English on this coast, it is certain that with the waning influence of such decrees after the Reformation England’s interest in maritime adventure grew rapidly.”
https://www.memphislibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/A-BRIEF-HISTORY-OF-SLAVERY-IN-AMERICA.pdf
25-30 Years ago when I only used 4 tv’s as a sort of wall paper MTV & all that shit/ I happen to pick up a slice of a BBC program on this subject….roughly coming down to “….whites involved in the Transatlantic travel of human cargo by cruiseships …but blacks selling other blacks to them leaves no one of the hook”
‼️don`t know about the sources / agenda of the writer of this article/ types like him should look to the other side of the penny:
https://samepassage.org/hilary-beckles-and-the-claim-that-africans-did-not-sell-their-own-into-slavery/
” (Sir Hilary McD.) Beckles. b. 11 August 1955 Barbados/ B.A. in Economic & Social History (1976) a Ph.D. (1980/ univ. Hull/ England- argues that the transatlantic slave trade was primarily a European enterprise, with powers like Britain/ the Netherlands/ Portugal creating the demand for enslaved labor to fuel their colonial economies/ particularly in the Caribbean.”
Dr. Tony Martin (1942- 2013) https://www.bitchute.com/video/7aSB12Yn0Tv1/ How Jews obscure their involvement in the slave trade/ 1973 to 2007 worked at Wellesley College in Massachusetts /via Silview Media
Lastbutnotleast https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=329238 gj comment 26 July 9.57 pm/ Dutch king Willem Alexander https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/19/dutch-study-reveals-extent-of-wealth-made-via-slavery-from-three-past-rulers-king-willem-alexander ‘Dutch Historians calculated the staggering value of colonial profit for Willem III (also king of England, Ireland and Scotland), Willem IV and Willem V for a report published at the request of the Dutch parliament last week before a widely expected apology over slavery from the Dutch king.’
Which he did Probably he knows what Tony Martin brings to light but business as usual/ mentioning the j-word is a no-go zone when you are a higher up in the present day social pyramid
Anyway Every Body Anywherepresentday
h.a.n.d. have a nice day 😎
CIA O
27 July https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gkoqZ3z9f0 ‘West Africa’s Single Currency Lie: How Traoré and AES Broke ECOWAS’s 50-Year Eco Promise!
For over fifty years, the leaders of West Africa have promised a single currency—the Eco—meant to break the economic chains of (neo/gj) colonial influence/ eliminate trade barriers & unify over 400 million people under one prosperous economic umbrella
Yet/ despite repeated declarations/ shifting deadlines & endless summit handshakes/ the Eco remains an unfulfilled dream. Why has a project meant to deliver true monetary independence repeatedly stalled?’
28 July https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDZM1zWCWLc How Captain Ibrahim Traore Govt. Transforms Burkina Faso Infrastrucrure & Development…. From newly paved highways & illuminated urban boulevards during the Ouagadougou Transformation to heavy industrial power plants & rural mining corridors/ the true depth of the Ibrahim Traore Revolution. ⚡
Sovereign gold reserves + local engineering expertise + grassroots community labor are funding massive Burkina Faso infrastructure projects without taking a single dollar in crippling international loans. 🌍
Traditional craftsmanship/ domestic brickmaking & energy independence are restoring pride/ dignity & sovereignty to millions of people across the nation.
27 July https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fnc_HR8UD4 ‘In a historic assertion of sovereignty, Ibrahim Traoré has shocked the world by launching a monumental 332 km eight-lane highway connecting Ouagadougou to Bobo-Dioulasso—built entirely without French aid or Western financial dependency.
Powered directly by domestic revenues 🤳🏾 from Burkina Faso Gold + ❗️ an unprecedented national mobilization, this massive engineering undertaking represents a decisive turning point for West Africa. 🌍
https://media.minutouno.com/p/d0a8f61d8fe70fa822cfe805a22d37af/adjuntos/150/imagenes/040/571/0040571745/1200×675/smart/macronjpg.jpg Maricron not exactly a happy camper
Anyway Every Body Anywhere
h.a.n.d. have a nice day 😎
CIA O
We can all become slaves under Trump. In his latest video financial analyst Sean Foo says Trump is doing what he recently said he would do and that is selling early access to his Truth Social comments for $100K per month. It’s only a few seconds early apparently, but that’s early enough for some Wall Street companies to want to pay for what is privileged access or insider trading, because with their high-speed computer trading they can jump the markets on that early info.
Information like that in the hands of rogues like Trump and Wall Street doesn’t just put companies at risk, it risks whole markets and whole industries. I get the feeling this is all about sewing up the markets for themselves in the last two years of Trump’s term. They could divi up trillions.
Lipton should have commented on the Arab slave trade as well, which existed long before Europeans arrived and which still continued after they left the slave trade and which they are still continuing today, as they have a dislike and contempt for Black people. African countries should also demand reparations from these countries, who still treat Africans and Asians with the upmost contempt, whilst kissing the arses and sucking the dicks of Whites.
The US https://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/lina-architects-deception.pdf the Masonic Executive Base/ page 188
page 189 “The Jewish masonic elite organized capturing black people in Africa/ transported them to America & controlled every slave market in the US….
That alone the Jewish freemason Aaron Lopez had control of more than half of the combined deals in the Colony of Rhode Island (with Newport) is a well-known fact (“Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade in America”, the Carnegie Institute, Washington”)
Lopez had more than 5% of all dealings with these black people for almost fifty years (1726-1774)…
More than 300 ships owned by the Jews (Isaac Gomez, Hayman Levy, Moses Ben Franks, Isaac Dias, Benjamin Levy & many others)were engaged in the slave trade.
The Jewish agency called Asiento later operating from Holland & England helped Jewish freemasons provide black slaves for the colonists. With the yearly capture + transport of one million black slaves it is not difficult to figure that from 1661 to 1774 (113 years) approximately 110 million slaves had been removed from their native land. About 10 per cent or eleven million black slaves reached the colonies alive.
Each Negro was valued at about 100 gallons of rum/ 100 pounds of gunpowder/ or in cash 18-20 dollars. Later the price was 40 dollars.
The blacks, purchased at the African coast for 20 to 40 dollars ❗️were then resold by the same Jewish masonic slave dealers in America for 2000 dollars. 11 million x 2000 dollars! This gives you an idea how
the Jewish masonic leaders managed to build up tremendous fortunes…
Already from the start fundamentalist Jews were actively involved in spreading freemasonry in America. The Jewish freemason Samuel Oppenheim’s book “The Jews and Masonry in the United States before
1810” (American Jewish Historical Society, 1910) proves this…
Comments https://archive.org/details/documentsillustr01donn/page/6/mode/2up illustrative of the history of the slave trade to America by Donnan, Elizabeth, 1883-1955, editor
page 7/ About 1610 Purchas obtained the story of the adventures of one Andrew Battell…… who had left England in 1589…..> “sent in the south-central coast of Angola, to trade. Here he found an encampment of natives who travelled from Sierra Leone, and with whom he traded: ❗️ “We loaded our ship with slaves in 7 days/ bought them so cheap that many did not cost one real/which were worth in the city of Loando twelve milreis.” …
…Whether or not the papal bulls had prevented an earlier appearance of the English on this coast, it is certain that with the waning influence of such decrees after the Reformation England’s interest in maritime adventure grew rapidly.”
https://www.memphislibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/A-BRIEF-HISTORY-OF-SLAVERY-IN-AMERICA.pdf
25-30 Years ago when I only used 4 tv’s as a sort of wall paper MTV & all that shit/ I happen to pick up a slice of a BBC program on this subject….roughly coming down to “….whites involved in the Transatlantic travel of human cargo by cruiseships …but blacks selling other blacks to them leaves no one of the hook”
‼️don`t know about the sources / agenda of the writer of this article/ types like him should look to the other side of the penny:
https://samepassage.org/hilary-beckles-and-the-claim-that-africans-did-not-sell-their-own-into-slavery/
” (Sir Hilary McD.) Beckles. b. 11 August 1955 Barbados/ B.A. in Economic & Social History (1976) a Ph.D. (1980/ univ. Hull/ England- argues that the transatlantic slave trade was primarily a European enterprise/ with powers like Britain/ the Netherlands/ Portugal creating the demand for enslaved labor to fuel their colonial economies/ particularly in the Caribbean.”
Dr. Tony Martin (1942- 2013) https://www.bitchute.com/video/7aSB12Yn0Tv1/ How Jews obscure their involvement in the slave trade/ 1973 to 2007 worked at Wellesley College in Massachusetts /via Silview Media
Many jews expelled from Spain in 1492 were Sefardi/ settled in Antwerp / Amsterdam were already more infected by the talmud btw…..
Lastbutnotleast https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=329238 gj comment 26 July 9.57 pm/ Dutch king Willem Alexander https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/19/dutch-study-reveals-extent-of-wealth-made-via-slavery-from-three-past-rulers-king-willem-alexander ‘Dutch Historians calculated the staggering value of colonial profit for Willem III (also king of England, Ireland and Scotland)/ Willem IV and Willem V for a report published at the request of the Dutch parliament last week before a widely expected apology over slavery from the Dutch king.’
Which he did/ Probably he knows what Tony Martin et al brings to light but business as usual/ mentioning the j-word is a no-go zone when you are a higher up in the present day political economic social tyranny p.e.s.t. pyramid…..but good that Willem Alexander did what he did in this cruiseship project
RotSchild – also money makers in this cruiseship project- did that some years back & these black Jews descending from the real Hebrews of 2000 yrs ago were living in certain parts of the African west coast & the black Jews expelled from Spain/ Portugal around 1492 were shipped to San Thome a newly discovered island 1470 (?) / its a little more complicated nuanced puzzle…if at all they survived the horrors of the catho inquisition….but all described by objective European writers in books prior to the 1900’s….
The Moors who brought civilisation to Iberia 711-1492 were btw morenos unlike the Morrocans who want to get en masse in this peninsula….Kalergi tsunami….chaos…
Bottomline these Ashkenazi are not jews but fake jews & diablo pedo THSB Trojan Horse Shit Bag drumpf is a crypto fake j. / Ashkenazis never set a nano part of even their small toe 2000 years ago in what is now 1948 israhell (Benjamin Frredman 1961 Willard Hotel Speech) but these psychotic warmongering bastards they are fully out to let the SHTF….they use their poltical psychotic horrifically stinking pouppee for it…Let Common Sense – which they have not – win…. /
Repeat Service Announcement: USA/ dump diablo drumpf c.s. in his reflection pool…
Anyway Every Body Anywhere
h.a.n.d. have a nice day 😎
CIA O
Nothing has changed. It’s gimme gimme, and they get.
@Gabreal Jones.
Yes, The Concubines, & the Castrated ! marched across the desert sands to the markets
along the North African coast. So ‘WHO’ rounded them up & offered them for ‘sale’. This was a reality in Biblical times.
And lets not forget the Moors, who raided Cornwall, Ireland & as far north as Iceland to capture ‘slaves’. All before Norman conquest.
& re- Traorie in Burkina Faso, Lets keep an eye on that situation,
I’ve seen the progress made, I believe two other adjoining nations are also in on the highway project.
Will he be the next to be assassinated…Like they did to the fella before him. ?
They also fight insurgents at the same time while trying to make these improvements for themselves., ISIS types… there’s a pattern here, as they do in Nigeria, sweeping in from the north.
No one gets the option to REJECT IMF loans & get away with it.
NO ONE.
Who is better off? The black descendents of slave traders or the black descendents of the slaves?
How many blacks died in the wars that ended slavery?
If people did not like slavery and genocide, they would not happen
With the “no munition enough now out in the open”…..the US (read the jewSA or USrahell) is as a giant on clay feet….
Why do you think insane eppy pedo files drumpf who is only in it for the money/ wiping his talmud ass off with the US flag still having wet dreams of hotels & casinos in Gaza suddenly caved in to China in his Iran war recently/ the diablo pedo still does’nt release the eppy files…..
27 July https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky000dAHy5s Trump Instantly Caves to China Over Iran — And It’s Worse Than You Think/ Lauren Cross….”
The US interceptor shortage- CSIS estimates on Patriot and THAAD- China’s structural leverage over the supply chain,
4.17 : building those THAAD radars requires gallium for the adamced radar modules/ China controls 98% of the worlds gallium supply….
0.33 ‘Beijing threatened to open the gates of hell if the US escalated….’ / did Beijing actually said that….
9.11 ‘ the framing war itself…… not that China opened the gates of hell/ they never never said that / the risk is that the US spent years letting a rival corner the supply the very materials its defence now depends on/ the ultimatum was fiction/ the dependency was fact…..
A war is grinding into its 5th month/ a stockpile is running low & the country that controls the raw material – gallium- in to refill it is sitting quitely on the sidelines…. ‘
Yet if it should come to a war between the US & China/ China is armed to over its teeth/ better not start Cafe Oppeneimer 12 March 2025 https://thebulletin.org/premium/2025-03/chinese-nuclear-weapons-2025/
1 May 2025 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muUks_u82C4&t=4s How many nuclear weapons does China have in 2025? Exploring China’s nuclear arsenal/ growing at a faster pace than any of the other nine nuclear weapons states.
comments/” Lets just say that China can have however many they wish to make. Only they will know the true numbers. Western “estimations” on China are almost always wrong. 😂”
16 July 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIYqtI3Ik30 The Shang Connection: Did this Nigerian tribe give rise to Chinese civilisation?/ African History Fountain/
3.44: “In China an Africoid presence is visble from remote Antiquity/ the Shang- for example- China’s first dynasts are described as having “black & oily skin’
The famous Chinese Sage Lao Tse b. 571 BC was “black in complexion” / The Global African Community History Notes/ The African Presence in the ancient Far East/ Runoko Rashidi)
1.33: The actual origins of the Chinese people/ a recent heavy duty international study by Chinese geneticists & multinational academics confirmed that the Chinese did not originate from Peking man in northern China as was once thought but from Negroes in east Africa….
12 June 2026 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9m9PQd7ckY The first Chinese emperor was black / by African History Fountain
“In this documentary, we explore the figure of Fu Hsi (Fuxi), the legendary founder of Chinese civilisation, through the writings of J.A. Rogers, Runoko Rashidi, Chancellor Williams, Godfrey Higgins, and Gerald Massey.
Is Fu Hsi, the legendary founder of Chinese civilisation/ really remembered as a black African ruler? According to historian J.A. Rogers in his book Sex and Race/ Fu Hsi was described as a “woolly-haired negro”. This startling statement opens the door to one of the most controversial and fascinating questions in ancient history.”
* Repeat Service Anouncement: USA/ dump THSB Trojan Horse Shitbag drumpf in his reflection pool/ then drag him up & let him stand trial…
Anyway Every Body Anywhere
h.a.n.d. have a nice day 😎
CIA O