By Courtney Kube, Katherine Doyle, Julie Tsirkin and Gordon Lubold – NBC News March 6, 2026

Above, US adviser training Montagnards (indigenous central highlanders) in Vietnam in1962. America’s campaign in the country began with the deployment of small teams of Special Forces operatives who were used to train and advise locals. Click to enlarge
President Donald Trump has privately expressed serious interest in deploying U.S. troops on the ground inside of Iran, according to two U.S. officials, a former U.S. official and another person with knowledge of the conversations.
Trump has discussed the idea of deploying ground troops with aides and Republican officials outside the White House while outlining his vision for a post-war Iran in which Iran’s uranium is secure and the U.S. and a new Iranian regime cooperate on oil production similar to how the U.S. and Venezuela are, the sources said.
The president’s comments expressing serious interest in deploying ground troops have not focused on a large-scale ground invasion of Iran, but rather on the idea of a small contingent of U.S. troops that would be used for specific strategic purposes, the U.S. officials, the former U.S. official and the person with knowledge of the discussions said. They said Trump has not made any decisions or given any orders related to ground troops.
“This story is based on assumptions from anonymous sources who are not part of the President’s national security team and are clearly not read into these discussions,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. “President Trump always, wisely keeps all options open, but anyone trying to insinuate he is in favor of one option or another proves they have no real seat at the table.”
Publicly, Trump has not ruled out putting U.S. “boots on the ground” in Iran, though the war has so far consisted only of an air campaign. His private discussions about the idea show a president perhaps more willing to consider taking such a step than his public comments on the issue so far have suggested. Any deployment of American troops inside of Iran could increase the scale and scope of the war — and escalate the risks to American forces.
Since the war began on Saturday, six U.S. service members have been killed and 18 wounded in counterattacks from Iran, according to the Pentagon.
Trump has privately described to aides and Republican officials outside the White House that his ideal outcome in Iran is one like the emerging dynamic between the U.S. and Venezuela since American special forces captured Nicolás Maduro in January, the current U.S. officials and former U.S. official said. In post-Maduro Venezuela, the U.S. backed a new president, Delcy Rodríguez, under the condition that she implement policies that Trump views as favorable to the U.S., including that the U.S. benefits from Venezuela’s oil production.
The president said in an interview with the New York Post this week, “I don’t have the yips with respect to boots on the ground.” He said while other presidents have ruled out boots on the ground, “I say ‘probably don’t need them,’ [or] ‘if they were necessary.’”
Foreign policy experts offered various scenarios in which the president might choose to deploy U.S. troops on the ground in Iran.
“You could envision them doing some sort of special operations insertions if there were targets that they absolutely needed to take out or reduce but didn’t lend themselves to bombardment,” said Joel Rayburn, a former Trump administration official and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. “That’s the kind of thing where you do an insertion, you attack a target, or conduct a raid, and then you get out.”

Send Barron.
Trump thinking he can just amass troops to attack Iran is a moron’s vision. Probably one of the reasons why Iran targeted several Gulf countries was not just to show they can do that, nor simply an attack on US assets, it was likely done to convince them they should not permit the staging of US troops in their country, a demand which was always possible once the conflict started.
At least Iran may have made the choice easier for some of them. They can risk being attacked again by Iran which looks quite possible, or face threats from the US which looks increasingly unlikely.
Send those Boots out there, otherwise they stick around in the States to become sheriffs and cops, as if we really need more of them, bulked up with specialty drugs that make em crazy. Or they become the homeless when they return, plugging up the public toilets. Wondering when all that Iranian opium is gonna hit the streets.
Anyone so morally bankrupt, dangerously stupid, and/or frothingly psychopathic enough to fight for Mordor and jewry deserves to get beaten to a pulp and shoved into a wood-chipper. Seriously, any costumed imbecile showing up to board a transport plane to go over there should be immediately determined to be so severely mentally retarded or hopelessly evil to warrant getting the ever living piss beaten out of them then executed right there on the tarmac. Meanwhile, anyone refusing orders to go on the grounds that they won’t fight for Mordor and jewry should be promoted in rank on the spot.
As long as those troops are comprised of Illegal Aliens; and the “woke” Liberals and their children; I will fully support it. It’s WAY past time for those two groups to have a little skin in the game.
@MM
Good analysis. Iranian attacks on port facilities not only impede US naval operations, but also make the launching of ground operations much more difficult.
“Trump has privately shown serious interest in U.S. ground troops in Iran” send Baron 1st!