Israel Hayom – Jan 11, 2026
Is the US heading toward a series of strikes in Iran? Over the past 24 hours, American media outlets have published a number os assessments about the feasibility of a US attack on the country, aimed at helping protesters opposing the regime.
According to a report in The New York Times, Trump has not made a final decision on strikes in Iran, despite support for such a move from other senior officials in his administration. The paper also claimed that the US military had asked the president for time to build up forces in the region and plan an operation that would be effective against the Iranian regime.
That request is understandable given the dispersal of US forces around the world, with particular emphasis on the US Navy’s aircraft carrier fleet. Aircraft carriers, together with their carrier strike groups, are the spearhead of America’s military power. Any strike by the US that goes beyond a symbolic blow, or a very limited and tightly targeted action, would require the involvement of at least one carrier strike group.
According to aircraft carrier tracking websites, of the 11 active US Navy aircraft carriers, seven are in the US undergoing various cycles of overhaul, rearming or repairs. Another aircraft carrier is currently in the Caribbean as part of the US deployment against the Venezuelan regime. Three additional carriers are in the Far East, with two in Japan and one in Southeast Asia. So far, there have been no reports of any of them heading toward the Middle East, and even if that were to happen, it would take many days before they arrived.
Even without aircraft carriers in the area, some form of US action against Iran is still possible, using America’s large regional bases. The US maintains three bases with a US Air Force presence in the Persian Gulf alone, including its main Middle East base in Qatar. In addition, the US has a further belt of bases in Iraq, Turkey and Jordan. A large number of fighter jets and bombers are permanently stationed in the region, and there have been unconfirmed reports in recent days that the US has reinforced its order of battle at these bases.
It is important to note that the current US military posture in the region is far from ideal, particularly in light of the risk of a broad Iranian retaliatory strike and the possibility that such escalation could spiral into a regional war. This reality limits the nature of any US operation, if it occurs, and undoubtedly factors into Trump’s decision-making on the issue.
Regarding the World Cup taking place in the US I heard they’re going to use rainbow LGBT flags on the corner posts and for the linesmen to offend Egypt and Iran when they play in Chicago. Whether that’s true or just mischief making I don’t know but the depth of childishness from western politicians means it could be true. A lot of teams could be banned from entering the US anyway, the place is that f**ked up. Many teams might withdraw and make the event a washout, especially as many supporters risk facing potential action from ICE – who know what they’re planning? – so it may be down to sport that shows the numbnuts of the world how undesirable the US has become. It could be a far different experience from the tournament we enjoyed when Russia held it in 2018.
The article says that “senior officials in his administration” have made the decision to strike Iran. To them, no doubt, and especially to Mr. Trump, the lure of destroying Iranian resistance for the black gold of oil is irresistible.
This is how Trump’s hand-picked officials are advising him:
“Mr. President, according to our estimations, the entire operation will be cost effective. If they sacrifice even three aircraft carriers, the losses will only be around $70 billion including the jets, which losses are far outweighed by the estimated $90 billion a year in revenue we will get by taking over the Iranian oil fields. Even it we get bogged down in a long ground war with the dollar signs mounting up to a few trillion every few years, what is that compared to the national debt? Think of the collateral in owning those oil reserves to prop up the US dollar, and to force nations such as China to actually buy US Iranian oil – with the dollar or with US stable coins. Besides, the bulk of the American people cannot wait to see their beloved carriers sending off lethal payloads for precision targets all over Iran. If that fails they will actually demand our stealth bombers and missiles finish the job and obliterate the nation. Sure, there will be some protests but they are actually harmless, and also they will be necessary, otherwise people in other nations may think we are heartless. The nice people never do anything violent anyway, and if they did our DF-trained officers would shoot them in their faces,.. ha, ha, ha (general laughter with the President)”. As for the possible loss of the carriers sir if we attack, not only will it be a total provocation against the American people, but we have to remember that China is building even larger and better ones, and their destruction will prove they are obsolete such that we will have to build even larger and more powerful ones. A lot of good can come out of this, and besides, you did promise to make America great again.”
Now don’t you ever be sad
Lean on me when times are bad
When the day comes and you’re down
In a river of trouble, about to drown
Hold on, I’m comin’
Hold on, I’m comin’
–Sam and Dave
israeli infiltrators have got in and are shooting folk in the heads
some one really should bomb israel
These fripperts seemed to have forgotten when the pentagon played numerous war games on their super computers led by top generals against Iran. They lost every time to the Iranian opposition.
that a/c is just a smorgasbord of targets for china, russia & iran…bring it on!
ANIMAL CRUELTY
Jane Dalton
Campaigners are accusing the government of a draconian crackdown by taking away the fundamental right to protest peacefully after it made non-violent demonstrations at animal-testing facilities a criminal offence.
Advocates for free speech and animal rights warned the move by home secretary Shabana Mahmood set a dangerous precedent towards clamping down on basic freedoms.
And activists staging round-the-clock vigils at a Cambridgeshire site breeding beagles for laboratory tests vowed to risk arrest to continue protesting. in a change to the law that was not part of a Bill before Parliament, Labour has amended the Public Order Act to categorise animal-testing fLabour ban on protest at animal-testing centres slated as ‘draconian’
Story byacilities, including universities and laboratories, as “key infrastructure”, alongside airports, power stations and motorways.
New Labour allowed the expansion of the Rothschild owned Huntingdon life scences, Tony Blair and David Blunket received an unknown number of shares in the firm.
Animals have very different systems to people several drugs such as thalidomide worked well on animals but were disastrous on humans
in a change to the law that was not part of a Bill before Parliament, Labour has amended the Public Order Act to categorise animal-testing facilities, including universities and laboratories, as “key infrastructure”, alongside airports, power stations and motorways.
Police will have stronger powers to stop animal cruelty protests, with penalties of up to a year in jail or an unlimited fine.
It means “Camp Beagle” demonstrators holding up placards outside a centre near Huntingdon that breeds dogs for laboratory testing could be prosecuted.
Anyone breaching the new ban may now face prison or an unlimited fine.
Cruelty Free International, which campaigns to end animal testing, branded the move “illiberal, draconian, unnecessary and almost certainly unlawful” and called on the Lords to reject it.
This measure is an unjustified attack on democratic rights, and risks setting a dangerous precedent towards an ever-growing restriction of peaceful protest,” a spokesman said.
John Curtin, an organiser at Camp Beagle, told The Independent he and fellow members were prepared to be arrested.
I once took in a rescued beagle but i could not afford his cigarettes
Archbishop of Canterbury betrayed us, claim ‘abuse victims’
Story by Gabriella Swerling • 1d
Dame Sarah Mullally wrote that claims against an accused priest were ‘unsubstantiated’ – Gareth Fuller/PA Wire
An alleged abuse victim has accused the incoming Archbishop of Canterbury of betrayal after she “mishandled” claims of sexual assault by a priest.
The alleged victim, known as N, claims that the Rt Rev Dame Sarah Mullally, who is an unrepentant lesbian and is rumoured to have been a man the current Bishop of London, “failed” him by sending a confidential email about the allegations directly to the priest concerned.
the Telegraph has seen the correspondence in which Bishop Sarah wrote to the priest saying that N’s claims were “unsubstantiated”.
As a result of how Church of England officials and Bishop Sarah handled his and other complaints, he claims to have been left feeling like “human wreckage” and driven to multiple suicide attempts.
Lambeth Palace has since admitted failings in how N’s complaint against Bishop Sarah was handled. Church officials also claim that an investigation of the priest found no safeguarding concerns, although N disputes this.
The allegations risk overshadowing Bishop Sarah’s official appointment as the first female Archbishop of Canterbury in just over two weeks. They follow the unprecedented resignation of her predecessor, Justin Welby, who became the first holder of the post in its 1,300-year history to resign over his hiding up of homosexual abuse scandals within the Church.
Many people are leaving due to Sarah Mulallys apointment
Here’ why none of this Abrahamic cluster*uck is relevant, in the long run, as rabbis and the other Red Sea Pedestrians demand that all earthlings respect and adore fake Israel, it’s fake “god,” and his phony mandates.
https://jackheartblog.org/wp/2026/01/when-counsel-whispers-by-mike-kay/.html?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_source_platform=mailpoet&utm_campaign=the-latest-post-from-jack-heart-blog-newsletterposttitle-4
“There has been much written concerning the Gods of the North. Mostly, the exploration occurs from a modern lens, which directly involves interpretation from an abrahamic reductionist point of view.
Perhaps at some point I will lay out how the Jew, the Christian, and the Muslim are all a singular point of view with a slightly different garnish. All three, with their offspring of Scientism, dominate the scope of modern thought. They define the terms, the parameters, and weigh the evidence. Theirs are the opinions that control discussion.
The fact is this condition is never mentioned. Abrahamic thought is treated as if it was the natural, organic, normal way to look at everything.
Well, it isn’t.”
Mike Kay explains, at the link.
Trump was obviously hoping that subversion (the ‘riots’) would do the trick, perhaps aided by a modest amount of military intervention. That then to be followed by the ‘new Shah’ stepping off the plane to ‘save the nation’. This only shows how out of touch with reality and how utterly controlled by Zionist crazies he really is. Iranians are not soft-touch Europeans. They have long memories too – they remember the SAVAK – his fathers brutal secret police. Unsurprisingly, his recent endorsement of Israel aggression didn’t go down well either.