1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Health
  4.  » Dr Malhotra’s speech on mRNA ‘vaccines’

Ian Fantom – Sept 7, 2025

Dear Kate Dearden,

I wrote to you in July 2025 about excess deaths caused by the mRNA COVID injections, saying that I was receiving reports every day linking excess deaths to the rollout of the mRNA ‘vaccines’ in various countries. I recognise the pressures you will be under in evaluating and replying to constituents’ letters on such matters, but the urgency of the situation demands that this be given absolute priority in the sphere of public health.

Every point that Dr Aseem Malhotra made at the Reform UK conference on Saturday (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEgAi1TK99o) is a point that I have made myself, and has fallen upon deaf ears. My qualifications are in Physics rather than Medicine, and so I held back in publishing my own analysis of the Pfizer test report, expecting someone in the health profession to produce a more authoritative paper on the subject. I brought to your attention in my letter that that paper could not
possibly have been genuinely peer reviewed.

One point that Dr Malhotra did not explicitly make in his speech was that that paper should be withdrawn by the New England Journal of Medicine. Eventually I went public on that with my article in The Truthseeker, ‘Will NEJM now withdraw the Pfizer Vaccine Trial paper?’, published on 20 November, 2021 (https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=245851).

Dr Malhotra mentioned that Stephen Kinnock had maligned him as an ‘antivaxx consipracy theorist’. That is the level that medical and scientific debate has fallen to in this country. All the big issues of state are governed by such indignation and name-calling, rather than by rational debate. An example of this is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4quumojkok . It quotes various sources, and misrepresents Dr Malhotra’s speech, which was not about vaccines but about the mRNA gene modifier, which is designed to work on completely different principles from vaccines. I don’t know who Voces de Oro is, but he sounds to me like a scientific ignoramus, possibly sponsored by a corrupt pharmaceutical industry. This morning’s mainstream media is full of such innuendo, which demonstrates the essential point that Dr Malhotra is making. I could see no denial of the facts that Dr Malhotra presented in that speech.

I am not a member of Reform UK, because, like the Labour Party and the Conservative Party, it is a Zionist party, supporting Britain’s role as an accomplice in the decimation of the people of Palestine. But I do agree with everything that Dr Malhotra stated in his courageous speech.

I appeal to you to raise this issue in Parliament, and not to accept any smears thrown at you or at Dr Malhotra. Stand your ground, and insist on the facts of the matter being aired in Parliament, as well as in the mainstream media.

Yours sincerely,

Ian Fantom, Information Scientist,

Brentwood, Kell Lane

Stump Cross, Halifax