A man holds the equipment used by Palestinian cameraman Hussam al-Masri who was killed along with other journalists at the Nasser hospital, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip on 25 August 2025 (Reuters/Hatem Khaled)
Middle East Eye – Aug 25, 2025
Israeli forces killed Middle East Eye journalists Mohamed Salama and Ahmed Abu Aziz on Monday, in a double-tap strike on the Nasser Hospital in the southern Gaza Strip.
Israeli forces bombed the fourth floor of the facility at around 11am local time (09:00 BST), then moments later, according to videos seen by MEE, fired a second missile deliberately at reporters, bystanders and first responders who had gathered to help recover the dead and wounded.
At the time of the attack, videos showed smoke billowing from an upper level at the hospital as rescue workers, standing on what appeared to be a staircase, appealed to those at ground level for help.
Then the second missile struck the exact area where they had amassed, with a correspondent for Jordan’s Al-Ghad TV channel crying out during a live broadcast that innocent people had been killed.
At least three other journalists were among the 19 Palestinians killed in the attack, including Mariam Dagga, a freelance reporter who worked with several media outlets including the Associated Press; Hussam al-Masri, a photojournalist with the Reuters news agency; and freelance reporter Moaz Abu Taha.
Salama, who started working with MEE shortly after Israel launched its genocidal campaign on the besieged enclave, also contributed for several other media outlets in a freelance capacity, most notably Al Jazeera Arabic and Al Jazeera Mubasher.
He filed regular reports for MEE and covered Israel’s January 2024 siege on the Nasser Hospital, the furore over the now-pulled BBC documentary Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone, and the killing of a frail 10-year-old boy, Abdulrahim ‘Amir’ al-Jarabe’a, at a Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) site in May.
Late last week, Salama spoke with MEE’s head of video production, Khaled Shalaby, about Israel’s starvation policy in the strip and discussed what he, and his partner Hala Asfour, a fellow journalist, also intended to cover in the week ahead.
In the phone call he said that he feared being targeted by Israeli forces following the recent assassination of Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent Anas al-Sharif and several of his crew members.
The Israeli military claimed, without providing any evidence, that it killed Sharif because he “served as the head of a terrorist cell in the Hamas terrorist organisation.”
Since Israel launched its war on the enclave in October 2023, it has routinely accused Palestinian journalists in Gaza of being Hamas members as part of what rights groups say is an effort to discredit their reporting of Israeli abuses.
Meanwhile, Abu Aziz, a freelance journalist based in Khan Younis, had contributed to dozens of reports for MEE since the Israeli genocide in Gaza began in October 2023.
He constantly updated MEE’s newsdesk with reports from the enclave, despite suffering a serious back injury which went untreated due to the war.
David Hearst, the editor-in-chief of Middle East Eye, called Salama and Abu Aziz “exceptional journalists,” and said they were working in “near impossible conditions” before they were “murdered” by Israel.
“Israel cannot hide the truth of the genocide it is waging in Gaza, so it is killing as many of those who record each strike as it can,” he said.
“What Israel is doing in Gaza is terrorism practised by a state. In killing as many civilians and non combatants as it can, in targeting hospitals, first responders and journalists, it is seeking to terrorise Palestinians into fleeing abroad.
“It must not and cannot be allowed to succeed. It is up to every nation that calls itself civilised to stop it.”
—
MEE’s Jerusalem bureau chief, Lubna Masarwa, said that she was in deep shock over the journalists’ killings, and said that Abu Aziz, who she was in constant contact with, had a deep “love for life”.
“His stories were exceptional, as well as very intimate,” she said. “He had capacity to see things others couldn’t and describe them in a detailed way.
“He had ambition, he was stubborn and he just kept going. He taught me that I could not afford to stop working on Gaza.”
Shortly after Monday’s attack, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, called on the international community to impose sanctions on Israel.
“Rescuers killed in line of duty. Scenes like this unfold every moment in Gaza, often unseen, largely undocumented,” she wrote.
“I beg states: how much more must be witnessed before you act to stop this carnage? Break the blockade. Impose an Arms Embargo. Impose Sanctions.”
More than 200,000 Palestinians have either been killed or wounded since Israel went to war in Gaza in October 2023, with recent reports, based on Israeli military intelligence data, indicating that more than 80 percent of those killed in the enclave until May of this year were civilians.
Israel’s genocidal war has been described as the “worst ever conflict” for journalists, according to a report published in April by the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.
The report, titled News Graveyards: How Dangers to War Reporters Endanger the World, said the Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip since October 2023 had “killed more journalists than the US Civil War, World Wars I and II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War (including the conflicts in Cambodia and Laos), the wars in Yugoslavia in the 1990s and 2000s, and the post-9/11 war in Afghanistan, combined”.
In a statement, the Foreign Press Association called for an “immediate explanation” from the Israeli military and called the double-tap “among the deadliest Israeli attacks on journalists working for international media since the Gaza war began.”
It said the “came with no warning” and hit an exterior staircase of the hospital “where journalists frequently stationed themselves with their cameras.”
Is not the truth the mean between Jew bashing and Jew blessing?
Why do our nations support Israel (the alleged exclusive homeland for Jewish people) and all of the atrocities that nation is responsible for?
Is it because there are so many Jews in our midst? No, there are very few per capita. The only answer is that they have usurped the money power of all our nations, and that power is most clearly seen in the vast controls of the Rothschild dynasty around the globe. Additionally, once established with credit from the cabal there is no end to financial backing for any Jewish enterprise when it comes to any form of competition. ,
The ruthless methods used by the Rothschild prodigy nation to carve out the nation they call Israel, and the fact that they have had no moral limits in doing so, ought to be compared as characteristic of how they have come to dominate so much in the West. However, to do that you will be marked by their tribal leaders as an enemy and likely become a victim of their ruthless ways.
Being outsiders and even stoking embers of hate against their own kind helps unite them to justify the liberties they take with all outsiders, serving a spurious entitlement complex coming from their exclusive creed, and which supports their quest to dominate the economic, political and social landscape everywhere. Also, once in control of credit in a world where money is God then who can resist them?
But where do they turn to, if they become equally disgusted? To some Anglo or EU power structure which is equally ruthless and which in any case they now control? Well, how about a spiritual structure which does not make money and power their gods. Why not search for the true body of Christ found in his true followers? That is what all converts had to do – give up the old ways for the really new.
AI generated.
Australia has officially accused Iran of orchestrating antisemitic attacks on its soil, including the firebombing of the Adass Israel synagogue in Melbourne. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the expulsion of Iran’s ambassador, citing evidence from the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) that links Iran to these violent acts. This decision marks a significant escalation in diplomatic tensions between the two nations. The attacks, which also included an arson incident at a Jewish delicatessen in Sydney, have raised alarm within the Australian Jewish community. Local leaders have expressed outrage, emphasizing that these acts are not only assaults on their community but also on Australia’s sovereignty. As Iran faces increasing scrutiny, the Australian government is taking a firm stance against foreign interference and violence. The situation underscores the broader geopolitical tensions surrounding Iran’s activities and its implications for international relations.
___________________________________________________
AI generated
Recent developments have linked Iran to a firebombing incident at the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne, prompting Australia to expel Iranian diplomats, including Ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated that credible intelligence indicates Iran orchestrated two antisemitic attacks, including the synagogue fire. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) has reportedly connected the attacks to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Investigations revealed that Melbourne crime figure Kazem ‘Kaz’ Hamad was allegedly taking orders from Iranian officials, further implicating Tehran in the incident. In response to these findings, Australia has severed diplomatic ties with Iran, marking a significant escalation in tensions. The Australian government is now considering designating the IRGC as a terrorist organization, reflecting the seriousness of the allegations and the ongoing threat posed by such antisemitic actions.
_________________________________________________
What did Netanyahu say shortly after the twin towers came down on 9/11?
Shortly after the tragic events of September 11, 2001, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made controversial remarks that have since sparked significant debate. During a press conference, he stated, “It’s very good,” referring to the potential geopolitical implications of the attacks for Israel. This comment was interpreted by many as suggesting that Israel could benefit from the heightened global focus on terrorism, particularly in relation to its own security concerns. Netanyahu’s remarks were made in a context where he emphasized the need for a united front against terrorism, linking the attacks to broader threats faced by Israel. He argued that the international community’s response to terrorism could lead to increased support for Israel’s security measures. These statements have been revisited over the years, often criticized for their insensitivity given the immense loss of life and suffering caused by the attacks. The fallout from his comments continues to influence discussions about U.S.-Israel relations and the global fight against terrorism.
Matthew 10:26
New International Version
“So do not be afraid of them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known.
New Living Translation
“But don’t be afraid of those who threaten you. For the time is coming when everything that is covered will be revealed, and all that is secret will be made known to all.
English Standard Version
“So have no fear of them, for nothing is covered that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known.
Berean Standard Bible
So do not be afraid of them. For there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, and nothing hidden that will not be made known.
Berean Literal Bible
Therefore you should not fear them! For nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known.
King James Bible
Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.
New King James Version
Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.
Netanyahu’s criminal military at it again. Another 20 innocent Gazans dead including 5 journalists.
He calls it a “mishap” and he says there’s going to be an investigation.
I’ve just heard Israel bombed someone in Syria also today.
The choice Jews as well as everyone else on this earth have is between a blessing and curse, which is the choice between heaven and hell, God and the devil, between good and evil. According to Cliffe Knechtle there is a line he line between good and evil in each one of us. It cannot simply be reduced to divisions between rich and poor, or the powerful versus the compliant, although it is a fact that those who have riches and power as their major ends do have a unity which has snuffed out that line and they are in fact in the business of spreading their evils. Knechtle preaches a unity among us based on our actual attachment to the person of Christ and not on denominational or external differences. The starting point for any reform is to recognise that there is or ought to be a line between good and evil in our own lives, and that without God there simply is no such line, and we become victims to our own moral relativism.
“Cliffe Knechtle Answers Tough Questions About the Bible, Demons, Israel, Judas, Free Will, and Death”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI9sn4esE84
Carlson asks Knechtle about “moral relativism” which appears to be the official creed of our times. Following in the footsteps of Jesus as well as many other converts to him, such as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Knechtle shows that there really is no such thing as “morality” without God.
The Jews who support what Israel is doing in Gaza appear to have either no “morality”, or if they do, it is most certainly a totally exclusive one with various duties only to their own people, allowing them to commit any evil they can get away with concerning outsiders, or against any competition to their own advancement. That is the real message from Gaza.
Because the line between good and evil is in fact in each one of us, and depends largely how we exercise our free will, when we survey in our past histories we see an endless parade of evil choices all in the name of “moral relativism” in which God’s standards are ignored, and where we craft our own standards which are invariably to satisfy our own temporal aims.
Hitler cast out Christ from his life and made up his own moral standards. His close followers did the same. Christian standards regarding right and wrong were twisted into the Swastika of power and progress, and most exclusively for the so-called “Arian” people. At the end of the war the Allied monsters tried the Nazi monsters, and when the Nazi monsters relied on the fact they did not break any international laws because Germany had left the League of Nations prior to the war, the Nuremberg court in order to convict them of any crimes, true to its own habits of Western hypocrisy, had refer to their own “positive laws” of the moment, and for something more basic and “universal they trotted out a spurious notion of “natural law” based on the view of that there is some kind of innate human goodness which ought to make all evil actions culpable. With the Rothschild-controlled nations including the atheistic communist ones having won the war, no doubt great pains were taken to avoid any mention of universal Christian standards based on the actual nature of God.
All tolled, even Nuremberg dealing with the alleged gas chambers was an exercise in “moral relativism”, so characteristic in the 20th and 21st centuries. With the Rothschild dynasty clearly on the side of might makes right, and the ends justify means, and especially for the advancement Jewish people, it ought to be no surprise that the genocide in “getting rid” of the unwanted Palestinians is generally regarded as “Kosher” and acceptable to our political leaders these days.
When we chose from the aims and methods on the evil side of the line, things tend to become institutionalized that way in our lives, and with our souls so mired down in those regions, we not only are unable to lift ourselves up^, but with the idea of right and wrong simply also being a matter of choice and personal preference, there is no real up^. This is the same plight for any government, organization, or corporate body in which evil practices such as wars for plunder and even child trafficking become institutionalised.
As for individual Jews regarding Gaza, they can either choose a curse and more extreme rejection by following the Rothschild groupthink or they can choose grace and redemption:
“For our appeal does not spring from deceit or impure motives or trickery, but just as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the message of the gospel, even so we speak, not to please mortals, but to please God who tests our hearts. As you know and as God is our witness, we never came with words of flattery or with a pretext for greed; nor did we seek praise from mortals, whether from you or from others, though we might have made demands as apostles of Christ. But we were gentle among you, like a nurse tenderly caring for her own children. So deeply do we care for you that we are determined to share with you not only the gospel of God but also our own selves, because you have become very dear to us.”
1 Thessalonians 2.1-8
Nuremberg failed to govern and suppress the evils of the powerful for successive generations simply because its evocation of natural law lacked sufficient substance to overcome the moral relativism which is the bride of the temporal powers. Only God has the power to life us Up^.
Question to ChatGPT: “Did the Nuremberg courts at the end of WWII evoke Christian morals and the laws of God to convict the Nazi criminals or did they just evoke natural law?”
ChatGPT said:
“Good question — the Nuremberg Trials are often remembered as a watershed in international law, and how they justified convicting Nazi leaders was very carefully framed.
At Nuremberg (1945–46), the prosecutors and judges did not base the trials explicitly on Christian morals or “the laws of God.” Instead, they invoked a combination of:
Positive international law – the Hague Conventions (1899, 1907) and the Kellogg–Briand Pact (1928) were cited as existing treaties that outlawed aggressive war, war crimes, and violations of civilian protections.
Natural law principles – because many of the Nazi crimes (e.g., genocide, crimes against humanity) had not been codified as such in prior treaties, the prosecutors appealed to universal moral principles that “any civilized nation” would recognize. The idea was that there are fundamental norms of justice that transcend particular states’ laws.
“Law above the state” – the tribunal emphasized that individuals cannot hide behind “just following orders” or their government’s authority. This reflects a natural-law reasoning: some crimes are so grave that obedience to the state does not excuse them.
That said, the language of the trials sometimes carried a moral tone that resonated with Judeo-Christian ethics. For example, Robert Jackson (chief U.S. prosecutor) in his opening statement called the crimes “so calculated, so malignant, and so devastating that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored.” But the court’s official reasoning avoided direct appeal to God or Christian theology.
Instead, they stressed that there are universal standards of right and wrong—what you might call a secularized form of natural law, not explicitly religious.”
israhellish official claims they always
keep the international laws . only the
majority of jewasslickers believes them .
If the journalist isn’t from CNN, FOX, BBC or other approved “quality” outlet, then…”kill him!”
@AMALEK
Mossad false flag 1
Shades of US-NATO in Serbia/Kosovo.
Fred B–moral relativism is a criminal scheme to make crimes be accepted: it points out the different mores in different peoples, or across time, or in different circumstances, and dismisses rules as being absolutes and not valid