Woman with cancer dying alone during chemotherapy
Kit Knightly – Off-Guardian Aug 4, 2025
An op-ed in the New York Times is calling for a “new definition of death” so that we can increase the number of available donor organs.
I’m not exaggerating, it’s right there in the headline:
Donor Organs Are Too Rare. We Need a New Definition of Death.
Sometimes you can only look at a headline and wonder.
Of course, redefining words and phrases is nothing new in the Great Reset world. “Case”, “cause of death”, “vaccine”, “terrorist”, “democracy”…all have received updated definitions in just the last few years. Rubberizing language so that words become malleable, with vague or even totally inverted meanings, is par for the course, just as Orwell predicted.
In this case, you take the word dead and “broaden” its definition to include…people who are alive.
Again, I’m not exaggerating:
The solution, we believe, is to broaden the definition of brain death to include irreversibly comatose patients on life support. Using this definition, these patients would be legally dead regardless of whether a machine restored the beating of their heart.
The justification is simple: we need more donor organs, and there aren’t enough people suffering either brain death or circulatory death. Therefore, we must broaden our definition of death to include people who are comatose for a long time.
People who are comatose aren’t really alive, after all. It’s the higher functions that really define life.
Yes, seriously:
The brain functions that matter most to life are those such as consciousness, memory, intention and desire. Once those higher brain functions are irreversibly gone, is it not fair to say that a person (as opposed to a body) has ceased to exist?
I’m sure nobody reading this really needs me to explain what terrible precedent this will set…but I’m going to.
Firstly, let’s point out the obvious: The second “irreversibly comatose” becomes the new standard for “dead” there will be pressure – unspoken, or otherwise – on medical practitioners to declare people such. Especially if it’s about harvesting organs.
Institutions dissolve responsibility in “protocols” and “guidelines”, we saw that during Covid. Nobody has to knowingly or deliberately kill someone, just tick a box on a form and let the machinery click in to motion.
The improved outcomes for patients awaiting donors will be reported (whether or not they really exist). The parents suing hospitals for harvesting organs “too promptly” or “without certain consent” won’t be.
More generally, the moment you start loosening the boundary between life and death with talk of “meaningful life” or life “worth living”, you’re tip-toeing up to the eugenics line. First, it’s the “irreversibly comatose” (who may, you must remember, wake up and be fine). Then it’s the physically crippled, the mentally disabled, the old and infirm.
After all, can someone with Alzheimer’s or dementia really be considered “alive” if they can’t remember who or where they are? Can someone with Parkinson’s really be considered living if they can’t move?
This isn’t a slippery slope, it’s a sheer cliff face slathered in baby oil.
We are already seeing the rise of other policies around the world that cheapen human life, from MAID in Canada to the looming Assisted Dying Act in the UK. They’re attacking it from the other end as well, with chatter about late-term – or even post-birth – abortion.
Nothing can come from this kind of redefinition of death, except an expansion of a nihilistic attitude that cheapens the value of human life.
Simply put, if they broaden the definition of “dead”, they are narrowing the definition of “alive”.
And I really don’t like where that might lead.
—
Support Off-Guardoan:
I live alone and it might be some time before a welfare check finds my body – several weeks – but at least I should be too far gone for organ pharming. If I collapse in public and reach the hospital barely alive, that’s the new ideal condition for harvesting. It doesn’t matter I may need those organs to pull through, I’m just working class and worth more dead than alive.
1980s Blacks mocked the English as “dead already” when fearing death from nuclear war
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BAlMxutiv8
How the NHS Killed Her Daughter l Resistance Podcast #60 with Kate Shemirani
Pretty good interview. Watched about 2 weeks ago. I recall Kate talking about organ removal.
Problem is for them to be any good, organ has to be removed whilst donor is alive…
this is a bit innacurate
in israel if a patient needs an organ
the IDF will go out and look for some one of a similar age and height
shoot them and throw a knife down beside them, claiming they were about to stab some one
also teams go through after the bombing taking away dead palestinians
the organs etc are removed the families never get the bodies back and are often charghed for the bullets
jews are very inter married with genetic problems, many of the childs remains found in the new york tunnels were taken for organs
This was predicted decades ago. Several sci-fi stories (there was also a film with this as a theme), introduced this idea. (‘Fiction’ is often used as a vehicle to initially plant ideas in the public consciousness). ‘Charitable’ databases of potential donors are precursors as well. Needless to say, every single pusher of this monstrous idea has been a Jew.
Just another scheme/pretext to ice more whites.
Harvesting organs, removing parts from people, soldiers, criminals,and traffic stops is an ongoing, major industry ,conducted by delightful people who run our medical, military, gov and other agencies all over our world. And they claim “not enough organs”, and dont forget blood. Ghouls. Vampires. Canibals. That’s who they are. The same folks that stage fakes, frauds, hoaxes.
Being right by predicting things to happen does not seem much in the final analysis, especially when you find that only a few people really care about the bad things and you can do nothing really to stop them in their folly. Yet, if you do nothing and are just an observer then no one will be saved.
Those of us who many decades ago gave our best to protect the unborn and motherhood, were total outcasts, but nevertheless we saved some from the evils. Our predictions that removing the protections from one group of vulnerable humans would lead to the exploitations and deaths of every other vulnerable group regardless of age, have all been borne out to be true. The result is that by allowing people to get rid of dependent offspring before their births on the basis that they are unwanted, or that their continued lives will interfere with one’s own life-style interests, we all end up endorsing absolute totalitarian rights of the powerful over the very lives of every other dependent and vulnerable group.
Sure, we could see it all coming and said so, but accordingly we were ignored and scorned by the powerful and by all leading institutions. By nullifying the integrity and uniqueness of the developing human body in the pregnant woman, feminists were able to spout the dishonest slogan “My body, My choice!”, and you were absolutely reviled if you showed that unborn children were different and distinct human lives. Arguing the biological facts and proving heartbeats and even consciousness was a fool’s errand with those who believed they were being empowered with sex free of any consequences.
In the face of the scientific proofs, the standard retort would be, “Okay it is human, but I still have a right to kill it.” And where was that kind of thinking leading our brave new liberated world, and especially with the establishment and our governments promoting the pill and free sex but not wanting to foot the bills for all of the mistakes? Right to assisted suicide and euthanasia, and the getting rid of anyone unwanted by or in the way of the more powerful, that was where.
For the body-parts industry, communist-capitalist China is leading the way. It is the model totalitarian nation of the unipolar WEF globalists but actually more the prodigy of the Rothschild bankster hydra also behind the multipolar globalist version, and Israel, of course.
Is there any use in discerning the truth and exposing the facts when the people have been so brainwashed and fragmented that there no longer seems to be any common ground? Is there really any use in trying to wake up the common people when even the word ‘common’ no longer has any real meaning, when not only the common law and common rights have virtually ceased to exist, and that even “common sense” has disappeared? Why a pro-truth movement when even the pro-life movement appears to have had no force or effect?
Again, if you do nothing then no one will be saved. If not for the truthers sounding off with the facts from the beginning about the Covid psyop, there would have been no “push back” against all the establishment and government evils. Virtually everyone would have been vaccinated. We would all be Palestinians. We would all have been injected with their abortive toxins.
While my mum was seriously ill from a panoply of respiratory disorders in 2018, my siblings and I met with the Consultant in charge of her care. He told us that our mother’s condition was terminal. He advised that remedial surgery wasn’t viable because she was too frail physically to endure the procedure and it would surely kill her. He recommended that she should be “allowed to die quietly,” ie that she should be euthenised by turning the valve off, on the oxygen tank keeping her alive. He asked me what I thought. I answered,
“No. Let God decide when she goes.”
To my surprise and consternaton, the doctor tutted loudly and stared at me with intense contempt. I’ll never forget it. I assured him, stutteringly, that I would not be persuaded otherwise.
My mum died two days later, depriving the consultant of his desired cull and sparing her family the duress of the litigation I would have brought against the hospital.
It’s been going on for some time. The Assisted Dying Bill is all about legally exculpating the masonic eugenicists of the Royal Society of Surgeons.
And given the involvement of the Jews in organs trafficking, you can expect this to be highly abused. In fact, if you really want a good shove into your next life, just sign up for organ donation. A Jew will be there somewhere in the background to help you along and to profit.
If the ambulance comes to pick you up and the EMTs look like this, guard your organs. https://www.shutterstock.com/image-generated/oil-painting-artistic-image-two-hasidic-2515845397
its all BS . they cut the organs out from
the living since decades ! a jew scam ! its
like an animal under Curare cut in peaces .
ha ha ha I remember this jew orthodox Dr in
uniform beginning Ukraine war . what business
had he there in Ukraine in wartime ? human
wellfare ? BULSHIT I knew for what he was there .
Wanted dead or alive: non-talmudic communists.
Here in the US you can opt out, that is NOT be an organ donor. I do know that doctors pressure family to pull the plug.
(doctors being mostly are not really qualified to judge actual spiritual matters like that anyway)
Made sure my husband changed the assignation on his license to NOT a donor..
The whole medical system is steeped in fraud.
(yes i i know there are good parts of it like triage, antibiotics, emergency surgery if necessary)
I also happen to know that when people give blood, most of the donations go to big pharma companies for research.
The medical system here, increasingly owned by private equity firms, is one big f*ing racket.
It has been ruled in the courts TWICE that doctors cannot charge the uninsured TWICE the amount they bill the insured, but they continue to do so.
They are also fond of using the court system to medically kidnap minors and the elderly to force treatment on them..for the medicaid/medicare cash of course.
Add to that talk of quarentine camps during the aftermath of event 201 (covid live event) and talk of forcing people to take the jab..and it is damn orwellian
“Woman with cancer dying alone during chemotherapy” – Shouldn’t this rather be: Woman isolated and dying through chemotherapy while “Healthcare” makes sure every possible penny is squeezed out of her in$urance.
“Donor Organs Are Too Rare” – that’s why there are “wars”. On a personal note: donating my liver to the local Dingo makes more sense than becoming part of the $pareparts Indu$try of pollitickal correctness and Jewish moralism (or was that moronism?).
If there was no cancer there would be NO GOVERNMENT as THE GOVERNMENT is the cancer of mankind.
Some people (relatively few) achieve “irreversibly comatose”
and (many) others will soon have “irreversibly comatose”
thrust upon them.
the well known heart transplant doctor magdi yacoub
was said by nurses to be keeping people alive on machines
so they were ready to give their organs when a donor came in
I would not donate an organ and have refused two offers of kidneys from siblings, having written about the transplant idea in the 1970s. All your organs are yours and nobody else’s