Louis-Ferdinand Destouches, pen name Celine, (1894 -1961), a French physician, is “considered one of the most influential writers of the twentieth century.” – Wikipedia
HenryMakow.com – Aug 4, 2025
Celine was an outspoken “anti-Semite.” His books are banned. His description of France in the 1930’s provides perspective on the whole world today. Organized Jewry (Rothschild banking cartel) begins the third Masonic Jewish world war by pitting the two branches of Jewish Freemasonry -Communism (Left) and Zionism (Right) against each other. War is the pretext for killing millions of goyim whom they define as anyone who rejects their Luciferian tyranny, including assimilated Jews.
In this excerpt from his 1937 book “Trifles for a Massacre,” he maintains that Jewish power and influence is the only subject that matters. The fact that it’s taboo indicates the takeover (facilitated by traitorous Freemasons) is complete. Was Celine a “hater” or, in fact, a patriot and realist?
“That which effectively characterizes “progress” in various societies, over the course of centuries, is the rise of the Jew to power, to all of the powers… All of the revolutions have given him an increasingly important status… The Jew who was less than nothing in the time of Nero, is in the process of becoming everything..”
(from Sept 1, 2012 and Feb 1, 2019)
Trifles for a Massacre, 1937 pp. 34-35
by Louis-Ferdinand Celine — (Edited by henrymakow.com)
In all candor, ...those who have returned from Russia [are] full of details concerning inconsequential items while avoiding the essential: they say nothing about the Jew.
The Jew is a taboo in all of the books which they present us. Gide, Citrine, Dorgel’s, Serge, etc., [his contemporaries] don’t say a word about it…
“The Jew is a Negro, the Semite race doesn’t exist, it’s an invention of Freemasons, the Jew is a product of the crossing of Negroes & Asiatic barbarians.” –Celine
Celine was one of the first to comprehend that Jewry is a mongrel problem. ‘Jew’ is just a word, which doesn’t define/explain anything really, but term them mongrels & you get to the core of the issue.
A.A.
Why would Henry who is Jewish and who has raised his kids in Judaism be exposing all of this negative stuff which reflects badly on all Jews? The way many people who comment on this site react is that all Jews are some kind of Satanists, which based on my experience is not the case, yet much of what Henry says about the trickiness and exclusiveness of the tribe is well supported by the facts.
What likely maintains many Jews from being absorbed into the general population of goys is not just being so special either in the eyes of God or according to their own estimations and comparisons, but also being able to capitalize on being excluded and even reviled. For instance, many Jews no doubt would find it more inviting to convert to Christianity, if they all were not so reviled as a “race” which they clearly are not, and not even according to their own blood lines. An ethnicity they are and with distinct cultural traits. Yet, most of us have met and have worked with good Jews and bad ones just like we have with “good” and “bad” everyone else. But there is that unity thing where in fact there is an exclusiveness making for a rather narrow neighbor principle for the tribe in general, in which it appears to us outsiders as entirely Kosher for them to weaken, exploit and even destroy peoples and cultures they consider as their competition, and even those which host them.
Not all Jews are rich or plugged into the chain of command from the relatively-exclusive Jewish money power, and I have met a few who have had no perks from being identified with the tribe, and who are relatively poor. Yet, I would have to conclude that it is their control over the money line and lending, and not the blood line which mainly keeps them loyal and together, and certainly not their religious faith, except for their cultish teachings in always being unjustly persecuted by the goys.
Now we see most Jews either supporting or being indifferent to the tremendous evils going on in Gaza, with a token number opposing the crimes. The tendency, unfortunately, is to paint the entire tribe with the same brush, which no doubt will lead to increased resentment and even hate. However, if that is exactly what they are so very good at capitalizing on, and then to identify and punish in some way all detractors, then why should we be sucked in and take the bate? Hating others is clearly a debt which no one can really afford unless they want eternal unrest. You can hate the sin but when you hate the sinner you not only cut the sinner off from real conversion but yourself.
true, & the jew will get upset if you call him a mongrel–that’s the last thing they want to be perceived as being, since they insanely view themselves as ‘Gods chosen people’ or a ‘superior race’. Whereas in reality, they’re just mongrel worthless nutters. Calling it a Jew doesn’t mean anything. great post nero
Maybe Makow demonstrates the ‘thesis + antithesis = synthesis’: the jew is evil + I am a practicing jew = reasonable hypocrisy.
@ Fred..
Henry runs on a sliding scale, his brief is to invoke apathy at what he portrays as the inevitable jewe empire, full spectrum merchant dominance and of course the final solution of the white European..
and blame it on Satan..
because at one time or another europeans were nasty to slavic oriental merchants from canaan and objected to their vulgar behaviours .
.but as always with jewes.. who never forget and hold grudges for millennia, the dialectical must be run, in the hope of a third way or ‘temple’ which also serves to promote the ‘not all jewes theorem’, just in case it all goes awry and tits up and the lice gas gets corked and the jack boots come out… because jewes inevitably fail at everything they set out to accomplish.. ask yahwee..
and finally…why bring your children up as jewes if you are a supposed christian, this you may well ask..
well, it’s obvious isn’t it?..it’s always best to learn the fucking hard way isn’t it?..
@Fred B:
I think Henry Makow is worried of the terrible consequences of a possible “triumph” of the tribe would have both for goyim and for most little Jews who are referred to as “our lesser brethren” and seen as “discardable in benefit of a greater cause” by higher up Jews.
Also, if the “Jewishness” doesn’t come from the mother, the person isn’t a “true Jew”, but just a second-rate one.
Truth is, tyranny ends up victimizing everybody, even some of those who initially benefit, when they happen to “fall into disgrace” with the comrades or higher-ups.
Contrary to the opinions of persons who hate Jews blindly, there exist also decent Jews who openly denounce what jewry has done and continues doing, for example Mr. Gerhard Menuhin in his book “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”.
The dedicatory page of his book reads as follows:
– For Germany.
– For Germans who still want to be German.
– For Humanity.
The last point makes it clear that the author acknowledges the great danger Jews represent for all humankind.
Many little Jews are simply propagandized “sheeple”, propagandized into being evil, of course.
But isn’t this very similar to what happened in the USA, England, and France pre-ww1, where, especially in the USA, the “sheeple” were so intensely propagandized against Germany and Germans that even American citizens of German ancestry had to hide by means of changing their names in order to escape the harassment?
Fingering only Jews is a very hipocritical thing to do.
Finally, one has to take into account that it’s white man’s sins that which enable and empower Jews to dominate and destroy him. In a way, Jews are the punishment for his sins.
And the proposal of satanists to mend things with even more sins is absurd and malicious.
Jews as we know them couldn’t exist in a world of justice and rectitude.
How difficult would be the life for Jews in a society where no one can be bought…
Man reaps what he sows.
Without repentance there will be no healing.
Fred B–the Nazis addressed this problem of trying to separate the good Jews from the bad: the main problem is that the good ones prevent any action against Jews in general (so they are not good)
The incomparable Miguel Serrano called the Jews, the “Anti-Race” and the “Race that’s not a Race.”
I have a book full of quotes by men of letters and statesmen against Jews: an eighth of the book is quotes from Jews. It seems that ALL brains hated the Jews, because brains like to see what is happening in the world