Jonathan Cook – jonathan-cook.net June 2, 2025
If you have spent the past 20 months wondering why British leaders on both sides of the aisle have barely criticised Israel, even as it slaughtered and starved Gaza’s population of more than two million people, you finally got an answer last week.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said the quiet part out loud. She told Sky: “Israel is fighting a proxy war [in Gaza] on behalf of the UK.”
—
According to Badenoch, the UK – and presumably in her assessment, other western powers – aren’t just supporting Israel against Hamas. They are willing that fight and helping to direct it. They view that fight as centrally important to their national interests.
This certainly accords with what we have witnessed over more than a year and a half. Both the current Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and its Tory predecessor under Rishi Sunak, have been unwavering in their commitment to send British arms to Israel, while also shipping weapons from the United States and Germany to help with the slaughter.
Both governments used the Royal Air Force base Akrotiri in Cyprus to carry out surveillance flights to aid Israel with locating targets to hit in Gaza. Both allowed British citizens to travel to Israel to take part as soldiers in the Gaza genocide.
Neither government joined South Africa’s case at the International Court of Justice, which found more than a year ago that Israel’s actions could “plausibly” be considered a genocide.
And neither government proposed or tried to impose alongside other western states, as happened in other recent “wars”, a no-fly zone over Gaza to stop Israel’s murderous assault, or organised with others to break Israel’s blockade and get aid into the enclave.
In other words, both governments steadfastly maintained their material support for Israel, even if Starmer recently toned down rhetorical support after images of emaciated babies and young children in Gaza – reminiscent of images of Jewish children in Nazi death camps like Auschwitz – shocked the world.
Coded language
If Badenoch is right that the UK is waging a proxy war in Gaza, it means that both British governments are directly responsible for the huge death toll of Palestinian civilians – running into many tens of thousands, and possibly hundreds of thousands – from Israel’s saturation bombing.
It also makes it indisputable that the UK is complicit in the current mass starvation of more than two million people there, which is indeed what Badenoch went on to imply in the coded language of political debate.
In reference to Starmer’s recent, and very belated, criticism of Israel’s starvation of Gaza’s entire population, she observed: “What I want to see is Keir Starmer making sure that he is on the right side of British national interest.”
According to Badenoch, Starmer’s implied threat – so far entirely unrealised – to limit the UK’s active collusion in the genocidal starvation of the people of Gaza could harm Britain’s national interests. How exactly?
Her comments should have startled, or at least baffled, Sky interviewer Trevor Phillips. But they passed unremarked.
Badenoch’s “proxy war” statement was also largely ignored by the rest of the British establishment media. Rightwing publications did notice it, but it appeared they were only disturbed by her equating the West’s proxy war in Gaza with the West’s proxy war in Ukraine.
Or as the opposition leader put it: “Israel is fighting a proxy war on behalf of the UK just like Ukraine is on behalf of western Europe against Russia.”
A column in the Spectator, the Tory party’s house journal, criticised her use of “proxy war” to describe Ukraine, but appeared to take the Gaza proxy war reference as read. James Heale, the Spectator’s deputy political editor, wrote: “By inadvertently echoing Russia’s position on Ukraine, Badenoch has handed her opponents another stick with which to beat her.”
The Telegraph, another Tory-leaning newspaper, ran a similarly themed article headlined: “Kremlin seizes on Badenoch’s Ukraine ‘proxy war’ comments.”
Related wars
The lack of a response to her Gaza “proxy war” remark suggests that this sentiment actually informs much thinking in western foreign policy circles, even if she broke the taboo on articulating it publicly.
To reach an answer on why Gaza is viewed as a proxy war – one Britain continues to be deeply invested in, even at the cost of a genocide – one must also understand why Ukraine is seen in similar terms. The two “wars” are more related than they might appear.
Despite the consternation of the Spectator and Telegraph, Badenoch is not the first British leader to point out that the West is fighting a proxy war in Ukraine.
Back in February, one of her predecessors, Boris Johnson, observed of western involvement in the three-year war between Russia and Ukraine: “Let’s face it, we’re waging a proxy war. We’re waging a proxy war. But we’re not giving our proxies [Ukraine] the ability to do the job.”
If anyone should know the truth about Ukraine, it is Johnson. After all, he was prime minister when Moscow invaded its neighbour in February 2022.
He was soon dispatched by Washington to Kyiv, where he appears to have strong-armed President Volodymyr Zelensky into abandoning ceasefire talks that were well advanced and could have led to a resolution.
Offensive frontiers
There are good reasons why Johnson and Badenoch each understand Ukraine as a proxy war.
This weekend Keith Kellogg, Donald Trump’s envoy to Ukraine, echoed them. He told Fox News that Russian president Vladimir Putin was not wrong to see Ukraine as a proxy war, and that the West was acting as aggressor by supplying Kyiv with weapons.
—
For years, the West had expanded Nato’s offensive frontiers towards Russia, despite Moscow’s explicit warnings that this would cross a red line.
With the West threatening to bring Russia’s neighbour Ukraine into Nato’s military fold, there were only ever likely to be one of two Russian responses. Either Putin would blink first and find Russia boxed in militarily, with Nato missiles – potentially nuclear-tipped – on his doorstep, minutes from Moscow. Or he would react pre-emptively to stop Ukraine’s accession to Nato by invading.
The West believed it had nothing to lose either way. If Russia invaded, Nato would then have the pretext to use Ukraine as a theatre of war to bleed Moscow, both economically with sanctions and militarily by flooding the battlefield with western weapons.
As we now know, Moscow chose to react. And while it has indeed been bleeding heavily, Ukrainian forces and European economies have been haemorrhaging even faster and more heavily.
The problem isn’t so much a lack of weapons – the West has supplied lots of them – as the fact that Ukraine has run out of conscripts willing to be sent into the maw of war.
The West is not, of course, going to send its own soldiers. A proxy war means someone else, in this case Ukrainians, does the fighting – and dying – for you.
Three years on, the conditions for a ceasefire have dramatically changed too. Having spilled so much of its own people’s blood, Russia is much less ready to make compromises, not least over the eastern territories it has conquered and annexed.
We have reached this nadir in Ukraine – one so deep that even US President Donald Trump appears ready to bail out – precisely because Nato, via Johnson, pushed Ukraine to keep fighting an unwinnable war.
Full-spectrum dominance
Nonetheless, there was a geopolitical logic, however twisted, to the West’s actions in Ukraine. Bleeding Russia, a military and economic power, accords with the hawkish priorities of the neoconservative cabals that run western capitals nowadays, whichever party is in charge.
The neoconservatives valorise what used to be called the military-industrial complex. They believe that the West has a civilisational superiority to the rest of the world, and must use its superior arsenal to defeat, or at least contain, any state that refuses to submit.
This is a modern reimagining of the “barbarians at the gate”, or as neoconservatives like to frame it, “a clash of civilisations”. The fall of the West would amount, in their view, to a return to the Dark Ages. We are supposedly in a life-or-death struggle.
In the US, the imperial hub of what we call “the West”, this has justified a massive investment in war industries – or what is referred to as “defence”, because it is an easier sell to domestic publics tired of the endless austerity required to maintain military superiority.
Western capitals profess to act as “global police”, while the rest of the world sees the West more in terms of a sociopathic mafia don. However one frames it, the Pentagon is officially pursuing a doctrine known as US “global full-spectrum dominance”. You must submit – that is, let us control the world’s resources – or pay the price.
In practice, a “foreign policy” like this has necessarily divided the world in two: those in the Godfather’s camp, and those outside it.
If Russia could not be contained and defanged by turning Ukraine into a Nato forward base on Moscow’s doorstep, it had to be dragged by the West into a debilitating proxy war that would neutralise Russia’s ability to ally with China against US global hegemony.
Acts of violence
That is what Badenoch and Johnson meant by the proxy war in Ukraine. But how is Israel’s mass murder of Palestinian civilians through saturation bombing and engineered starvation similarly a proxy war – and one apparently benefitting the UK and the West, as Badenoch argues?
Interestingly, Badenoch offered two not entirely compatible reasons for Israel’s “war” on Gaza.
Initially, she told Sky: “Israel is fighting a war where they want to get 58 hostages who have not been returned. That is what all of this is about … What we need to make sure is that we’re on the side that is going to eradicate Hamas.”
But even “eradicating Hamas” is hard to square with British foreign policy objectives. After all, despite the UK’s designation of Hamas as a terrorist organisation, it has never attacked Britain, has said it has no such intention, and is unlikely to ever be in a position to do so.
Instead, it is far more likely that Israel’s destruction of Gaza, with visible western collusion, will inflame hotheads into random or misguided acts of violence that cannot be prepared for or stopped – acts of terror similar to the US gunman who recently shot dead two Israeli embassy staff in Washington DC.
That might be reason enough to conclude that the UK ought to distance itself from Israel’s actions as quickly as possible, rather than standing squarely behind Tel Aviv.
It was only when she was pushed by Phillips to explain her position that Badenoch switched trajectory. Apparently it wasn’t just about the hostages. She added: “Who funds Hamas? Iran, an enemy of this country.”
Cornered by her own logic, she then grasped tightly the West’s neoconservative comfort blanket and spoke of a “proxy war”.
‘Bracing’ truth?
Badenoch’s point was not lost on Stephen Pollard, the former editor of the Jewish Chronicle. In a column, he noted of the Sky interview: “Badenoch has a bracing attitude to the truth – she tells it as it is, even if it doesn’t make her popular.”
The “bracing” truth from Badenoch is that Israel is as central to the projection of western power into the oil-rich Middle East as it was more than a century ago, when Britain conceived of Palestine as a “national home for the Jewish people” in place of the native Palestinian population.
From Britain’s perspective, Israel’s war on Gaza, as Badenoch concedes, is not centrally about “eradicating Hamas” or “getting back the hostages” taken during the group’s attack on Israel on 7 October 2023.
Rather, it is about arming Israel to weaken those, like Iran and its regional allies, who refuse to submit to the West’s domination of the Middle East – or in the case of Palestinians, to their own dispossession and erasure.
In that way, arming Israel is seen as no different from arming Ukraine to weaken Russian influence in eastern Europe. It is about containing the West’s geostrategic rivals – or potential partners, were they not viewed exclusively through the prism of western “full-spectrum dominance” – as effectively as Israel has locked Palestinians into prisons and concentration camps in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
This strategy is about averting any danger that one day Russia, China, Iran and others could unite effectively to oust the US and its allies from their heavily fortified hilltop. Alliances like Brics are seen as a potential vehicle for such an assault on western dominance.
Whatever the rhetoric, western capitals are not chiefly concerned about military or “civilisational” threats. They do not fear being invaded or conquered by their “enemies”. In fact, their reckless behaviours in places like Ukraine make a cataclysmic nuclear confrontation more likely.
What drives western foreign policy is the craving to maintain global economic primacy. And terrorising other states with the West’s superior military might is seen as the only way to ensure such primacy.
There is nothing new about the West’s fears, nor are they partisan. Differences within western establishments are never over whether the West should assert “full-spectrum dominance” around the globe through client states such as Israel and Ukraine. Instead, factional splits emerge over which elements within those client states the West should be allying with the closest.
‘Rogue’ policy
The question of alliances has been particularly fraught in the case of Israel, where the far-right and religious extremist factions in the government have a near-Messianic view of their place and role in the Middle East.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and many of those closest to him have been trying for decades to manoeuvre the US into launching an attack on Iran, not least to remove Israel’s main rival in the Middle East and guarantee its nuclear-armed regional primacy in perpetuity.
So far, Netanyahu has found no takers in the White House. But that hasn’t stopped him trying. He is widely reported to be deep in efforts to push Trump into joining an attack on Iran, in the midst of talks between Washington and Tehran.
Over many years, British hawks look like they have been playing their own role in these manoeuvres. In the recent past, at least two ambitious British government ministers on the right have been caught trying to cosy up to the most belligerent elements in the Israeli security establishment.
In 2017, Priti Patel was forced to resign as international development secretary after she was found to have held 12 secret meetings with senior Israeli officials, including Netanyahu, while supposedly on a family holiday. She had other off-the-books meetingswith Israeli officials in New York and London.
Six years earlier, then-Defence Secretary Liam Fox also had to step down after a series of shadowy meetings with Israeli officials. Fox’s ministry was also known to have drawn updetailed plans for British assistance in the event of a US military strike on Iran, including allowing the Americans to use Diego Garcia, a British territory in the Indian ocean.
Unnamed government officials told the Guardian at the time that Fox had been pursuing an “alternative” government policy. Former British diplomat Craig Murray was more direct: his sources within government suggested Fox had been conspiring with Israel in a “rogue” foreign policy towards Iran, against Britain’s stated aims.
Crime scene
The West’s behaviours are ideologically driven, not rational or moral. The compulsive, self-sabotaging nature of western support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza is no different – though far grosser – than the self-sabotaging nature of its actions in Ukraine.
The West has lost the battle against Russia, but refuses to learn or adapt. And it has spent whatever moral legitimacy it still had left in propping up an Israeli military occupier bent on starving millions of people to death, if they cannot be ethnically cleansed into Egypt first.
Netanyahu has not been the easy-to-sell, cuddly military mascot that Zelensky proved to be in Ukraine.
Support for Kyiv could at least be presented as taking the right side in a clash of civilisations with a barbarous Russia. Support for Israel simply exposes the West’s hypocrisy, its worship of power for its own sake, and its psychopathic instincts.
Support for Israel’s genocide has hollowed out the West’s claim to moral superiority for all but its most deluded devotees. Sadly, those still include most of the western political and media establishments, whose only rationale is to evangelise for the belief system over which they preside, claiming it to be the worthiest in history.
Some, like Starmer, are trying to moderate their rhetoric in a desperate attempt to protect the morally bankrupt system that has invested them with power.
Others, like Badenoch, are still so enthralled by the cult of a superior West that they are blind to how preposterous their rantings sound to anyone no longer rapt in devotion. Rather than distance herself from Israel’s atrocities, she is happy to place herself – and the UK – at the crime scene.
The scales have fallen from western publics’ eyes. Now is the time to hold our leaders fully to account.
To help Jonathan’s work please consider making a donation.
WAR ?
PM Sir Keir Starmer calls on nation to be ready for war with Russia
Sir Keir Starmer told ” no thanks if you want war with russia you fight it”
Starmer tried to channel his inner Lord Kitchener after insisting all UK citizens had a role to play in the defence of the nation from Russia.
We do not want war
The PM warned the “threat of Russia cannot be ignored” and said the UK must prepare for battle as he announced £15bn borrowed from rothschild at great interest. spending on nuclear weapons programmes while UK people queue at food banks
White British people are already a minority in the UK ministers warned
But the Prime Minister was made to look stupid after being criticised for making ‘deeply dishonest’ claims about Labour’s record on importing migrants
Another glorious “british leader”. It looks very british doesn’t it? Lammy’s second cousin?
I actually, for the first time, saw someone admit that britain was being purposefully flooded with muslim men. They even mentioned the “muslim council” and all the muslim “leaders”. Amazing. Far too late though. That thing above would be all for more muslim men. She’d like it.
All the white christian men in britain want to hand their wives and daughters over to the muslims. When the war starts and all the whites get “euthanised”, the muslims will be all they have left to impregnate them. Remember all those “adverts” and “bbc” and “bank” and etc images of black men with their hands all over white women? Better get used to it all you white women.
It’s now £5m a day to house them in hotels and they’re building 1.5m boxes to GIVE to them to live in. How’s your “mortgage” going?
How I hate britain. It’s the most disgusting hole on earth.
As an aside, some “greenpeace activists” took a waxwork of macron and dumped it on the russian embassy in france. It doesn’t matter why. All it shows is that “greenpeace” is blackrock too, a fact which I’ve known for years but others seem to not grasp. It used to actually be a real charity that did real things (it started by being a simple group protesting against nuclear bombs). It got taken over by the jew years ago. Now it does PR work for the jew and the “leaders” are millionaires (they used to be normal housewives at the very beginning). The jew corrupts everything it touches.
Talk about an inversion of reality. Firstly the jews made sure a female negro fronted the “coservative” party. How cuckolded do you need to be to think that this is “normal” ??? Then this same negress tries to wiggle around the Palestine slaughter by saying it is being done for the West????
This creature is like every other politico: it lies as a matter of course. It is the jewed “west” that is fighting for the kikes in Occupied Palestine and also in Ukraine.
Oleg Constantinov the 22 year old rent boy ” jilted ”
by Kier Starmer when he came to power
has told ABC News that he has had offers from
Stephen Fry Philip Schofield and some one called Carl Jones, to put him up in a little secret flat of his own
Dont know what that is all about ?
Jews have always used starvation as a weapon of war
they did it to germany in ww 2
Stalins jews starved the ukraine
when Hitler came with bread lorries grown men were seen crying they had food for their families
Many of them Joined Hitlers forces to get revenge on Stalins jews
This what the present trouble is about
Jews want Ukraine destroyed
they are destroying palestine lebanon etc with starvation
and we are helping this abomination
Boring. And we all know it.
Just as the Ukraine conflict was fomented many years before hand, & impossible to deny after Merk the berk & mighty Micron both said accords were suggested & agreed upon…’To buy time’ for Ukrainians forces to be built up ready to fight Russia. (They said it not me )
Like wise this Gaza fiasco, why would the Economist magazine show Para gliders attacking each other..One with an Israeli pilot, the other with a Palestinian headband firing back at him…all back in 2012 no less, come on guys it’s a pantomime & all the *SATT are in on the script,
Each playing their part.
& forget the He said- we said bollocks from the parliament benches…as to ‘who’ started the Jimmy Grant invasion,
Kalergi-Cordenhove only reiterated the long term plan as told to him years before by the Shit house rabbi’s. Many since him like Barbara Spectre have given everyone a ‘reminder’ over the following decades. It’s all as they told us it would be.
It’s worth a £2 bet…(should be outstanding odds) that Brum will resemble the streets of Port au Prince by 2040.
Bradford akin to Islamabad, Blackburn – Kabul.
The new comers like it that way.. It’s all they’re good at. = feeling comfortable.
* Scum At The Top
there is never any need for wars
war is a failure of politicians
Doctor Who viewers grateful for Ncuti Gatwa’s exit from BBC series
Story by Jacob Stolworthy •
as the prog loses viewers, the BBC admits its error and sacks him
Paul Fuller
Keir Starmer’s right-hand man exposed as list of terrorist clients revealed
Story by Christian Calgie •
Robert Jenrick has called for Attorney General Lord Hermer to be sacked after revealing his controversial list of legal clients before entering politics. Lord Harmer has come under increasing fire over a number of highly controversial moves in Government, including a key role in the surrender of the Chagos Islands and involvement in keeping Lucy Connolly behind bars•
In a brutal attack video this morning, Robert Jenrick revealed that Lord Harmer’s previous clients as a lawyer included terrorist leader Gerry Adams, Shamima Begum, and several jewish terrorists . He asked: “Lord Hermer has spent much of his life defending those who hate Britain. Why on earth did Starmer hand-pick him to be Attorney General?”
Finally I notice the obvious thing: White Christians get inexorably erased from the world, so they tell us every single day that some Brown Moslems are under attack, to cover up or blur out the truth: the Israelis are only playing a role here
It is axiomatic that Britain fights on tbe wrong side of every war.
“Britain is at the heart of Gaza ‘proxy war’”
Gee… what a SURPRISE!!!
Who could have possibly guessed that the Demonic Entity that unleased its rabid attack-dog Izzy on the world with its Balfour Declaration of 1917 is STILL “neck deep in it”…
not just complicit but at the very “heart of “directing affairs” in getting the Gaza Genocide “done” ? ? ?
Certainly not one-in-million THICK Brits!!!😳
100% obvious to anyone with half a brain cell that demon-possessed creatures in positions of illicit power lie through their teeth supported by their equally-corrupt media such as Sky News. You NEVER see guests invited to that corrupt studio that can argue the case for the other side, or even if you DO see that rare occasion due to Offcom responses to complaints, it it heavily censored and only a fleeting mention of what’s really going on behind the smokescreens – otherwise known as fake mainstream news in the pay of the most corrupt evil creatures now plaguing the planet.
Only those dumb enough to swallow MSM fake news (silence in particular) are victims of their own ignorance.
My opinion of Jonathan Cook has changed after reading this article – Jonathan Cook is just one of the multiple liers spreading the stale ideas of the so-called “holocaust”.
“…. images of emaciated babies and young children in Gaza – reminiscent of images of Jewish children in Nazi death camps like Auschwitz – shocked the world.”
If ” images of emaciated babies and young children of Gaza” DO EXIST AND ARE REAL, “the images of Jewish children in Nazi concentration camps like Auschwitz” are just the product of Jonathan Cook’s imagination or in other words – lies.
Here below is the iconic picture the zionist show all over the world:
https://sfi.usc.edu/content/auschwitz-childrens-photo
On the picture you can see well fed and well dressed children. And mind you this picture was taken about at least after a year of systematic bombings by the Allies of the railways leading to Auschwitz which according to the declaration of the International Red Cross reduced the supplies to Auschwiz.
Jonathan Cook IS A LIER! No jewish children were starved at Auschwiz, unlike the palestinian children of Gaza starved by the jews.
Btw Could someone please explain to me WTF a nimcompoop Nigerian female
– who looks as much “British” as I do Mongolian! –
is doing perched at almost the pinnacle of the country’s Political Class ? ? ?
TIA!!! 🙄
LOL..
Well it’s not a great leap of logic to inquire why..of course imbeciles like this hack here would like you to think that it’s just the pirate rock establishment, part of the Great Game but that’s his job..
and of course that’s an interesting bit of subterfuge..but that’s all it is…because of course if you did engage you brain, you would have to admit to yourself you had lost your nation to a fifth column who have aims diametrically opposed to your peoples..
and quite evidently you have…if you ever did..
Of course there isn’t any battle against Russia, because they don’t exist either.. a cursory glance at what’s happened over there in the last thirty years since the fake wall came down details an obvious plan…such as it is.
…there is however a great hurry to rearrange society into the ((trilateralist)) arrangement preferred by the hollow men….because they are all greedy gangsters and the clock’s ticking..and of course the best way to re-engineer a society is by war. so that’s what you’ll have.
..in case you haven’t noticed you are right in the middle of it..
since the end of the last one..lol..
By the way…
All those strictures for controlling society that failed to materialize under the convid lark..you know forced vaccination, bio passports, regular lockdowns,total information control, rationing etc etc etc..
you can get all of that nonsense with a fake war..
yes indeedy… you’ll see.
As I wrote on here days ago:
Divert the white man from his own war/predicament (i.e., invasion of the West by millions of wogs, white female mulatto producers, & the genocide of whites in Ukraine by Eurasian Commie Russia) onto Jew & wog conflicts/interests (Israel/Iran/Palestine) far away.
Now the Yids appointed some she ape as the Tory leader. So hows that demolishing Nazi Germany working out for you white Englishman?
Join ASP today.
cathar
if you haven’t figured it out yet, all these alt news ‘analysts’ like cook, whitney, giraldi, macgregor, ritter etc are hustlers, disinfo agents and cia-kgb plants
Help us white man. our homes are rubble thanks to the fascists. we want to come to UK and manage petrol station and set up grooming gangs
Why “writers” like Jonathan Cook never write that HAMAS is as a “terrorist” organisation as the French “Resistance” or as the american fighters against the British rule?
Actually British at that time called Jefferson and Washington “terrorists”. After all even the UN Charter proclaims that any nation under occupation has a right to armed resistance. Isn’t HAMAS just an armed resistance? And all the horror stories about October 2003 are just a pack of kike lies.
America has produced female nog politicians who hate Russia, and the Scum of GB will be attempting the same thing
Said it many times, Israel is an unsigned member of Nazi NATO, and so is UKraine.
As Biden was recorded, telling Zelensky, ‘One day we will make it official.
Think about it. China wants to make all of Asia, and Africa richer and more prosperous. This is why Saudi Arabia and so many others have joined, or want to join BRICS.
The BRICS are hated by the Nazis. The last thing Joolandia wants, are prosperous countries around it.
Let’s say that Israel became Greater Israel, with big chunks of Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, and all of Jordan. The next thing they seek, would be the collapse of Turkey, and so on. There’s no limit to Nazi hate.
Look at Nazi Starmer. He didn’t arrive at No10 and say, ‘we are going to invest £14 billion in manufacturing none military widgets, and the reason for that is that is damages the City Crime Cartels profit centers. Military spending aids City Crime Cartels profits, and that investment doesn’t trickle into the High Street economy, apart from the jobs. You manufacture a widget in the UK for £1, it sells in the shops for £3/4 pounds. You make a widget in China for £1, it sells in the UK for £20. The CCCs takes a big portion of that £19 quid in banking charges, and interest. This system is greased with massive debts.
Every none Nazi country, the moment it tries to get on its feet, the Nazis set about fucking that country up.
Russia has been reborn under Putin, and Russia exports cheap energy and resources around the world, even to Nazi states, but they’ve made it ever so expensive for themselves.
The City Crime Cartels and Wall Street mobs can’t abide what Russia is doing. Many pundits say it’s all about UKrainian resources, IT’S NOT! If you bought UKrainian resources into the global markets, or even the US markets, prices would fall. The Nazi West doesn’t like falling prices. Their system required steady inflation, hence the Chinese corporate bans, the recent/threatened US 50% steel tariffs.
Air France 447 crashed into the South Atlantic. One of the business rams on board (all died), was manufacturing steel in South America & planning to import it into Nazi Amerika. Now, I’m not saying the plane was crashed because of him, because their might have been 6 or 7 passenger they wanted dead, but there’s one motive, but this is how things work.
nick kolelrstrom wlcome back
Jeremy Clarkson hits out at ‘woke’ BBC dramas: ‘People will stop watching’
Story by Fran Winston •
The massive drop in watchers of Dr Who was a case in point
Notice during Waste Whitey II nobody outside of Germany was protesting against the bombing of German children. Oh that’s right, they’re white.
chesterton:
‘All those strictures for controlling society that failed to materialize under the convid lark..you know forced vaccination, bio passports, regular lockdowns,total information control, rationing etc etc etc..:
Only the thicko sheeple followed this crap.
I didn’t wear face nappy, not on London transport, not in supermarkets, and I went out when I liked, 4, 5, and 6 times per day, and I didn’t get jabbed and none of my immediate family got jabbed, due to my advice.
Israel is a controlled environment where they can create the illusion of a generally anti-Islamic world, while it nurses them along to dominance everywhere
No F..king kidding lolol.
@ Carl..
Yes..lots of us didn’t comply, much more than they let on…the point being they will try again under some sort of national security pretense ..under the auspices of their fake war…you know the drill…stay home and eat bugs we’ve all been bombed with a Russkie plague, line up at burger king for you stab of toxic shit..that sort of thing
which is obvious.. of course they can all get fucked..