Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi
Patrick Wintour – The Guardian May 22, 2025
Iran has said it will hold the US responsible for any Israeli attack on its nuclear sites in remarks that set a fraught backdrop for the fifth and probably most important round of talks between Iran and the US on the future of Iran’s nuclear program.
Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, issued the warning on Thursday after reports appeared in the American media claiming US intelligence understood Israel was planning an attack on Iranian nuclear sites – with or without American support – if the talks broke down.
The report may be accurate or an attempt by the US to strengthen its negotiating hand before the indirect talks in Rome, which are being mediated by Oman. Israel has repeatedly said it will attack Iran’s nuclear sites, while Donald Trump has said the US will do so if the talks break down.
In a letter to the UN, Araghchi said: “Iran strongly warns against any adventurism by the Zionist regime of Israel and will decisively respond to any threat or unlawful act by this regime.”
In a letter to the UN, Araghchi said: “Iran strongly warns against any adventurism by the Zionist regime of Israel and will decisively respond to any threat or unlawful act by this regime.”
He said Iran would view Washington as a “participant” in any such attack, and Tehran would have to adopt “special measures” to protect its nuclear sites and material from any attacks or sabotage. Araghchi said the UN nuclear inspectorate, the IAEA, would only be subsequently informed of such steps.
An adviser to Iran’s supreme leader said in April that Tehran could suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear inspectors or transfer enriched material to safe and undisclosed locations.
In a separate statement released on Thursday, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said Israel would receive a “devastating and decisive response” if it attacked Iran.
Alimohammad Naini , the guards’ spokesperson, said: “They are trying to frighten us with war but are miscalculating as they are unaware of the powerful popular and military support the Islamic Republic can muster in war conditions.”
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on Tuesday that US demands for Tehran to stop refining uranium were “excessive and outrageous”, his most unequivocal statement that Iran will not abandon the capacity to enrich. But he said he did not expect the talks with the US to succeed.
The US special envoy, Steve Witkoff, has insisted that Washington’s red line is that Iran must end all uranium enrichment. In the 2015 deal with six world powers, from which Trump withdrew in 2018, Iran had been allowed to enrich to 3.67% purity, sufficient for producing fuel for commercial nuclear power plants.
Iran has since enriched to 60%, bringing it close to the purity required to make a nuclear bomb. Araghchi initially said the US public demand for zero enrichment was not being repeated in private discussions, but the issue appears to have become the central battleground of the talks. The US says zero enrichment is the only way to end the risk of Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb and has suggested Tehran follows the model of the United Arab Emirates that imports uranium for its single civil nuclear program.
But Iran says it has a right to enrich under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and argues there is no reason for it to be treated differently to other states.
Explaining Iran’s determination to enrich domestically, as opposed to import, Ellie Geranmayeh of the European Council on Foreign Relations said: “Iran really does feel that it has paid a huge cost for its right to enrich on its own soil. It has not only paid billions in actually setting up the infrastructure, but it has paid billions in sanctions that were imposed on it and the loss of oil sales.
“Iranian officials believe they have paid with blood, in reference to scientists that have been assassinated throughout the course of the last few decades working on this programme. This programme and the right for enrichment for civil nuclear purposes, has now become an issue of national pride.”
Abbas Araghchi, has also stated that the only deal is that the Nazis accept Iran won’t build nukes, so all the other chat about enrichment, & dumping their missile program, isn’t on the table.
This leaves Donald Hitler with probably the biggest decision since WW2, and even then, Bibi could still drag Nazi Amerika down the pan.
Sure, Iran is quite right, Israel can’t attack without US help, but can Donald Hitler stop this help when US Nazi elites are very devided and are hardly loyal to DH, and there’s the chance DH will be sent into the afterlife, because the ideological struggles are that great.
We’ve found out over recent months that Donald Hitler is probably a better liar than Boris Johnson, and this poses serious risks, where foreign analysts discount anything DH says, and they take what Rubio and his like say, as real US intentions.
Donald Hitler is in a corner, and so far he’s a failed president, so anything is possible, but this could be huge. Israel could be very badly damaged, if not destroyed, then 50k of unprotected US forces in the region, and the ultimate global feck up, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, so keep your fuel tank full, and a few 20lt fuel cans.
Lets assume this antagonism all kicks-off,
It’s going to be interesting to see how many ‘sleeper cells’ the Iranian’s & muslim nations in general
have fully operational & ‘ready to go’ within the U.S. !
It must also be the very same situation in the UK, with a very sizable ‘army’ of foreign combatants literally ready & willing to DESTROY when commanded to do so.
The “4* hotels” are barracks, & I reckon the invaders are very well armed & trained.
(does anyone really know otherwise ?)
The conscious Carcinogenic infestation runs deep. VERY DEEP.
‘Iran would view US as participant in any Israeli attack’
Of course, since they’re all in on it, gradually working towards fulfilling Jewish eschatology. Look at the head on this Araghchi guy. Looks Jewy. 10 to 1 its Donmeh.
Hey Nico X (Nero for the tourists), why don’t you post a picture of yourself somewhere so we can see if you might look “jewy”.
10 to 1 it’s jewy.
♪♪They call him jewy Louis… They call him jewy Louis… ♪♪♪
yes behind every bullying is the jew yankee .
he is behind the houseowner in germany,
england, balticum fearing expropiation by
russian communist therefore electing his
european megalomaniacish warmongers .
and behind france+polish yankee arslickers .
the houseowners dont check that the danger
comes from their greenleftistliberals already
under Biden on way to expropiation + will
continue again after Trump .
Enormous’ cost of social housing revealed as taxpayers ‘subsidise
migrants in London’
Story by Ben Chapman
New research from the Prosperity Institute has revealed the “enormous” cost of social housing in the UK, with taxpayers subsidising migrants to live in expensive areas like London.
The research, carried out by the Pimlico Journal, shows that social housing represents a large, hidden transfer from taxpayers to favoured groups who have been allocated homes in front of our own people
They did not need a survey anyone in the street could have ttold you this
my hobby was cycling
but the club has just disbanded due to cyclists coming off their bikes from potholes and being injured and the cost of constant new wheels from pot holes
a friend recommended this website and it is very interesting and i am learning so much which i then google on the net for more info i read about donald hitler
i had never heard of him despite spending a long time on google searches
can anyone help please ?
Plymouth protests recap: ‘Anti-government’ march sees crowd chanting ‘stop the migrant spongers’
Story by Mieka Smiles, Jon King, Carl Eve, Eleanor Burleigh
Protesters gathered in Plymouth, Devon, for an “anti- communist-government” march on Saturday, May 24, . The event, kicked off at 12pm.
Those taking part in the protest could be heard shouting “stop the migrants”,
a small band of people held placards ” stop israeli terrorism “