Willow Tohi – Natural News March 18, 2025
- President Donald Trump announced on March 16, that federal funding would be cut for universities allowing “illegal protests,” specifically targeting pro-Palestine demonstrations. The move has sparked widespread controversy and is seen as a significant threat to free speech and academic freedom.
- Trump’s announcement, supported by officials like Elise Stefanik and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., conflates pro-Palestine activism with antisemitism. The administration has also taken concrete steps, such as detaining Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestine activist, signaling a broader crackdown on dissent.
- Civil rights organizations, including the ACLU and FIRE, have condemned the administration’s actions as a blatant attack on free speech. They warn that the measures will suppress student protests and chill open debate on campuses, particularly regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
- The current suppression of dissent is compared to the McCarthy era, where fear of communism led to widespread censorship and persecution. Critics argue that the administration is exploiting concerns about antisemitism to silence criticism of Israel, eroding civil liberties.
In a startling escalation of the ongoing debate over free speech and academic freedom, President Donald Trump’s recent announcement to cut federal funding to universities allowing “illegal protests” has ignited a firestorm of controversy. The move, widely seen as targeting pro-Palestine demonstrations, has raised alarms among civil liberties advocates, who warn that the administration’s actions represent the most significant threat to free speech since the McCarthy era.
Trump’s crackdown on campus protests
On March 16, President Trump took to Truth Social to declare, “All Federal Funding will STOP for any College, School, or University that allows illegal protests. Agitators will be imprisoned/or permanently sent back to the country from which they came. American students will be permanently expelled or, depending on the crime, arrested. NO MASKS!”
The post, which obliquely referenced pro-Palestine demonstrations, was quickly endorsed by Elise Stefanik, Trump’s nominee for ambassador to the UN, who tweeted, “Antisemitism and anti-Israel hate will not be tolerated on American campuses.”
This announcement follows a series of inflammatory statements from Trump administration officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who likened antisemitism to a “spiritual and moral malady” comparable to “history’s most deadly plagues.” Kennedy’s remarks, which conflated pro-Palestine activism with antisemitism, were echoed by Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, who accused universities of allowing “unlawful encampments and demonstrations” that “deprive Jewish students of learning opportunities.”
Critics argue that the administration’s rhetoric is a thinly veiled attempt to suppress dissent against Israel’s policies. “They are using the completely fictional narrative of ‘antisemitism’ on university campuses to stomp out protests against Israeli atrocities in the United States,” one commentator noted.
Civil liberties under siege
The government’s actions have drawn swift condemnation from civil rights organizations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) have both issued statements denouncing the move as a blatant attack on free speech.
“It is disturbing to see the White House threatening freedom of speech and academic freedom on U.S. college campuses so blatantly,” said Cecillia Wang, legal director of the ACLU. “We stand in solidarity with university leaders in their commitment to free speech, open debate and peaceful dissent on campus.”
FIRE echoed these concerns, warning that Trump’s announcement “will cast an impermissible chill on student protests about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.” The organization pointed to the administration’s 2019 executive order adopting an unconstitutional definition of antisemitism and its January 2025 order threatening to deport international students for engaging in protected expression as part of a broader pattern of suppressing dissent.
In a chilling example of the government’s crackdown on pro-Palestine activism, immigration agents recently detained Mahmoud Khalil, a leader of last year’s protests at Columbia University. Khalil, who holds a green card, was taken from his home and placed in a detention facility in Louisiana. Trump later boasted on Truth Social, “This is the first arrest of many to come.”
A historical parallel: The red scare
The current climate of suppression bears a striking resemblance to the Red Scare of the 1940s and 1950s, when fear of communist infiltration led to widespread censorship and persecution of leftist activists. During that era, Senator Joseph McCarthy’s infamous witch hunts targeted individuals for their political beliefs, resulting in a chilling effect on free speech and academic freedom.
“This seems like one of the biggest threats, if not the biggest threats to First Amendment freedoms in 50 years,” said Brian Hauss, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU. “It’s a direct attempt to punish speech because of the viewpoint it espouses.”
A call to action
The West’s unwavering support for Israel has emerged as the single greatest threat to free speech in modern society. From social media censorship to the persecution of journalists and activists, the suppression of dissent is being carried out with alarming speed and brazenness.
For those who cherish free speech, the choice is clear: oppose the suppression of dissent, even if it means challenging long-held beliefs about Israel. As one commentator put it, “If you support freedom of speech, you now have an ethical obligation to oppose Israel, even if you didn’t before.”
The stakes could not be higher. In the words of Margo Schlanger, a law professor and former head of civil rights at the Department of Homeland Security, “I teach constitutional law. And I’m freaking out.”
The question now is whether the American public will stand idly by as the First Amendment is dismantled—or rise to defend the principles of free speech.
Sources include:
Well known British playwright embarks on 150-mile fasting pilgrimage for Palestine
Story by Lynn Rusk A British playwright has embarked on a 150-mile fasting pilgrimage to raise funds for schoolchildren in Gaza and to stand up against israeli terrorism
Peter Oswald, a former writer in residence at Shakespeare’s Globe theatre, set off from Bristol on Tuesday and will finish his 13-day journey in Parliament Square in London at the end of March. The 59-year-old from Devon will also fast from dawn to dusk, marking the holy month of Ramadan in solidarity with the Palestinian people and the global Muslim community as part of his “Pilgrimage4Palestine”.
The award-winning playwright and poet will take part in poetry performances along the route, reading a mixture of his own work about Palestine and poetry by young Palestinians. Thankyou Peter
Adolf Hitler after a 4 year dialogue with british officials
formed a pact with prime minister Neville Chamberlian
against the plan for the soviet expansion to take most of europe
this plan yo allow the commie jews to take most of europe was supported by churchill and herbert morrison who spoke openly of it
these two were among rothschilds trusted agents
AW SHUCKS…
the ‘jewes’ are persecuting the normies now…’who woulda thunk’.. maybe it’s polytickal..
Have a chat with Irving David about that one..because it seems free speech has been a figment of your imaginations for a while… your whole life in fact…
Try screaming ‘Nigger Nigger Nigger Kikes’, just for shits and giggles in your local or whilst you are at the very un super market…and watch all your good friends..
just melt away…
lol… 😉
https://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-groups-threaten-irish-pm-with-serious-action-during-his-diplomatic-trip-to-u-s/?doing_wp_cron=1742395176.2765278816223144531250
Jewish representative groups have addressed “antisemitism and vilification of Israel” in Ireland with Taoiseach Micheal Martin.
Mr Martin attended a meeting with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee (AJC) in Washington DC on Friday.
[…] [T]he AJC said the groups wanted to directly address concerns about “antisemitism and the demonisation of Israel in Ireland”.
It said Ireland is seen as “one of the most problematic countries in Europe”.
Most idiots don’t know that the Nazis were anti-Zionist opposing the creation of a Jewish State (Israel) in Palestine– so a more accurate flag would be the star of david merged with the hammer & sickle (communism) rather than the swastika.
Is this article written by ChatGPT? It sure reads like it.
The term ‘antisemitism’ is a code word for Marxism which is why the current president is cracking down verbally & financially on our ‘institutions of higher learning’.
‘Freedom of speech’ has never been defined & therefore became the bottomless pit for every subversive communication that the talmudic communists use to this day successfully preventing any & all agreement as to the destiny of the white race.
Jews are antichrist, so the folks Jews have turned into antichrists, (into godless cretins) or (cretins for Satan) have the right to be antisemitic because Semite or Shem is a Biblical thing, and godless cretins don’t believe in Christ or the Bible.
Who is Shem?
Shem, one of Noah’s three sons, plays a crucial role in biblical history. According to the Book of Genesis, he was instrumental in repopulating the earth after the Great Flood, which God used to cleanse humanity of its wickedness. Many scholars believe Shem was the eldest son, and his lineage is significant as it leads to the Jewish people and ultimately to Jesus Christ. Shem is often associated with the Semitic languages, which derive their name from him. His descendants are considered the ancestors of various nations, including the Israelites. Additionally, some traditions identify Shem with Melchizedek, a priest-king who blessed Abraham, highlighting his importance in the biblical narrative. Overall, Shem’s legacy is foundational in understanding the genealogies and spiritual heritage that shape the Judeo-Christian tradition. His life and lineage underscore the continuity of God’s plan for humanity throughout the ages.
What did Jesus mean when he declared Pharisees are the offspring of vipers and their father the Devil?
In Matthew 12:34, Jesus refers to the Pharisees as a “brood of vipers,” a term that signifies their deceitful and corrupt nature. This metaphor suggests that, like venomous snakes, the Pharisees were harmful to the spiritual well-being of the people. Jesus emphasizes that their actions and teachings were not aligned with God’s truth, but rather stemmed from a malevolent source. In John 8:44, Jesus further clarifies this by stating that the Pharisees belong to their “father, the devil.” This declaration underscores the idea that their motivations and desires were rooted in evil, contrasting sharply with the divine truth He preached. By labeling them in this way, Jesus sought to expose their hypocrisy and the destructive impact of their legalistic practices on the faith community.Ultimately, these statements serve as a powerful warning against false teachings and the importance of genuine faith rooted in love and truth.
Today all are expected to believe Semites are of the line of Shem.
Is Netanyahu of the line of Shem?
Benjamin Netanyahu, born in 1949 in Tel Aviv, is a prominent Israeli politician who has served multiple terms as Prime Minister. His lineage has sparked interest, particularly regarding his connection to biblical figures. While some sources suggest that Netanyahu is a direct descendant of King David, it is noted that he belongs to the tribe of Levi rather than Judah. This lineage ties him to the priestly class of ancient Israel.Netanyahu’s ancestry is complex, with roots tracing back to various regions, including the Iberian Peninsula, as revealed through DNA testing. This highlights the diverse heritage of Ashkenazi Jews, who often identify with the lineage of Shem, one of Noah’s sons. The discussion around Netanyahu’s lineage reflects broader themes of identity and heritage within the Jewish community, emphasizing the historical connections that shape contemporary Israeli society.
What is Netanyahu’s real name?
Benjamin Netanyahu, the prominent Israeli politician and diplomat, was born as Benzion Mileikowsky on October 21, 1949, in Tel Aviv. His family background is rooted in Warsaw, Poland, where his father, a writer and Zionist, influenced his early life. The name change from Mileikowsky to Netanyahu reflects a common practice among Israeli leaders to adopt names that resonate more with Jewish and Middle Eastern identities.Netanyahu has served multiple terms as Israel’s Prime Minister, making him the longest-serving leader in the country’s history. His tenure has been marked by significant political events, including controversial judicial reforms and a hardline government stance. His leadership style and policies have shaped Israel’s political landscape for over three decades.Understanding Netanyahu’s real name provides insight into his identity and the broader context of Israeli political culture, where names often carry historical and cultural significance.
Battle for the truth is going on right now in AI.
Long live the Truth
molock dead right my friend
thankyou perfectly put
Surprised to see the ACLU mentioned here….best advice here is “don’t trust the cunts”….they’re batting for the other side…
Someone should have a word with the famous Irish wrestler guy….he gets involved with Trump he’ gets burned sooner or later…..that’s what politicians do….
HE SHOULD BE GETTING THE JEWS AT GUINNESS TO STOP FUNDING THE INVASION OF HIS COUNTRY!!
@hauntess
And what is “the hate of “Israel”” code word for? And your current president super-kike Drumpfendreck is “draining” the bottomless swamp in which he himself is the main
reptile.
@moloch
Seems like the real idiot are you
…..On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive collaboration…..
SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading “A Nazi Travels to Palestine.” The series expressed great admiration for the pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding article, “pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of the world: the Jewish question.” Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the joint SS-Zionist visit…
and here is the medal
https://www.flickr.com/photos/zeevveez/15513322452
@moloch
Please read this and maybe then you’ll shut up
if there was someone who really helped the zionist cause it was NSDAP, or more exactly the part of the NSDAP that was under Hitler’s control, because as soon as Hitler became the chancellor – he got rid of the people who were loyal to the original ideas of the true ariosophy of Guido von List – like Rudolf von Zeebotendorf who was forst into exile in Turkey and later found dead. He had written a book “Bevor Hitler kam” which Hitler did not like at all… At the same time Hitler immediately established contacts with the zionist leaders in Palestine and concluded with them an agreement(The Transfer agreement) actually creating the infrastructure of the future zionist state. Ex-wermact officer Hennecke Kardel even wrote a book – “Hitler -der begruender von “Israel””. In fact, von Ribbentrop, who was clever enough to see the dangers of this agreement for Germany, warned Hitler about it in early 1939. After which…Hitler overruled him and gave order to carry on implementing the agreement until the very beginning of the war in September 1939
https://ihr.org/journal/v13n4p29_Weber.html
https://www.unz.com/pub/jhr__zionism-and-the-third-reich/
Zionism and the Third Reich
By Mark Weber
Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, “Tel Aviv,” while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member….