Scroll down for video
Hamza Yusuf – Declassified UK Feb 20, 2025
Journalists working at Britain’s most prestigious newspapers and TV channels have expressed concern at pro-Israel bias inside their organisations. Speaking exclusively to Declassified, half a dozen current and former staff at the BBC, Sky, ITN, the Guardian and the Times have disclosed the extent of anti-Palestinian prejudice in their newsrooms.
All of the journalists requested anonymity for fear of professional reprisals. Despite working for a range of outlets from across the political spectrum, they painted a consistent picture of the obstacles faced by reporters who want to humanise Palestinians or scrutinise Israeli government narratives.
A reporter from the right-wing Times newspaper said: “I literally cried in the bathroom so many times because of the uphill battle of trying to get things reported.” Disgruntled staff at the liberal Guardian have compiled an “exhaustive spreadsheet” with a “mountain of examples” of the paper “amplifying unchallenged Israeli propaganda…or treating clearly false statements by Israeli spokespeople as credible”.
Journalists working in TV studios face a similar struggle, with swift repercussions if guests from the Israeli government are asked difficult questions on air. Declassified was told: “The Israeli narrative always reigned supreme and instructed the coverage at Sky News, no matter how inaccurate”.
At the BBC, when it comes to reporting accurately on the nature of Israeli conduct in Gaza, a journalist said “the use of the word genocide is effectively banned, and any contributor who uses this word is immediately shut down.” At ITN, which produces news programmes for three British TV channels, the focus is on “clicks not ethical clarity”, a member of staff lamented. “Tragic footage [from Gaza] is often met with…remarks about how much traffic it will generate, as if it’s not real lives being impacted.”
Sky’s ‘skewed’ news
Across all the mainstream media outlets where Declassified gained access to insiders, a recurring theme was the challenge of reporting on Israel’s war crimes, despite them being caught on camera.
One journalist at Sky News suggested there are a whole set of unwritten journalistic rules that apply exclusively to Israel. “It’s a continuous battle to report the truth,” they said. “We would see the raw footage being sent to us from Gaza – we’re all well aware of the carnage. Yet you can’t describe what your eyes are seeing.
“I remember when [Israel’s then defence minister] Yoav Gallant announced the ‘complete siege’ immediately after October 7. It was a blockade on top of an already crippling blockade. It was a violation of international law that was going to have catastrophic consequences, and yet this wasn’t allowed to be conveyed in the coverage.”
Since Israel began its onslaught in Gaza, Sky News has been criticised on social media for not attributing blame when Palestinians were killed, in contrast to vivid, humanising reporting on Israeli victims. Inside the newsroom, there is unease at how much prominence is given to the Israeli military’s version of events.
“Myself and other colleagues found ourselves frequently frustrated at how nothing could be reported unless there was a response or confirmation from the Israeli army,” the Sky journalist told Declassified. “We know who’s doing the killing, we know who’s responsible, so why must we wait for Israel to confirm or deny before we attribute? We never wait for the Russians; we take Ukrainian claims at face value as the victims. Why is this any different?
“Nor was any version Israel provided ever challenged. It was taken as fact, always. I remember challenging senior members of staff, reminding them that Israel repeatedly lies and has a history of doing so. But it was pointless and fell on deaf ears. The Israeli narrative always reigned supreme and instructed the coverage at Sky News, no matter how inaccurate”.
Speaking up and trying to shift the direction of coverage was not without consequence, the Sky News journalist added. “To adopt a stance other than Israel having the right to defend itself, to push back against the skewed coverage would earn you the label of being difficult or rigid”.
‘Avalanche of phone calls’
The choice of which guests to book, and how hard to scrutinise them, has been another issue of concern inside the newsroom. Sky News frequently treated Palestinian guests with hostility, including muting them. For Israeli guests, that was a line that could not be crossed.
“If we had an interview with the Palestinian ambassador that comprehensively conveyed the Palestinian side, or a presenter challenged an IDF spokesperson, or even a news report that humanised Palestinians and explicitly named Israel as the perpetrator, there’d be an avalanche of phone calls and complaints promptly,” the Sky source said.
Who exactly was responsible for some of the phone calls – and what their intent was – also became apparent. “Israeli spokespeople or officials who had access to senior figures would pressure Sky News and often threaten to pull access to correspondents on the ground as a result. This clearly impacted what was and wasn’t said on air.”
Sky News did not respond to requests for comment.
There are similar concerns at ITN, which makes the news programmes for ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5. A journalist employed by ITN, who wished not to disclose the exact programme they worked on, highlighted the callous attitude towards reporting on Palestine.
“Even when Gaza was covered, it was driven by ‘clicks’, not ethical clarity,” they confided. “With the sheer scale of loss in Gaza, stories with dramatic visuals – like explosions or Israeli soldiers on the ground – were often chosen over humanitarian stories.
“Tragic footage is often met with comments like, ‘That’s really good footage,’ or remarks about how much traffic it will generate, as if it’s not real lives being impacted. Working in an environment where colleagues seem detached – or even excited – about these tragedies is incredibly difficult.”
ITN declined to comment.
BBC bias
Over at the BBC, two former journalists told Declassified that the playbook from Sky and ITN sounded very familiar. One went on to describe how after October 7 the systemic bias was clear to see, with the BBC overtly “dehumanising Palestinians across TV, radio and online output.”
They suggested there was an unmistakable hierarchy of human life in the coverage, with “a deliberate focus on Israelis who lost their lives and their hostages, with reporters naming them and developing narratives about them which were very sympathetic and humanising, yet there was no such treatment for the Palestinians.”
Trying to amplify stories centred around Palestinians was challenging because “despite the disproportionality in the conflict, programme editors would insist on ‘balancing’ Palestinian voices with Israeli ones. When I pitched a piece about a Palestinian whose family was caught up in the destruction of Gaza, I was immediately told we also had to find an equivalent Israeli story. It was an admission that focusing on the suffering of Palestinians didn’t merit a story item of its own.”
That journalist recalled how unwritten rules coming from senior staff engendered a culture of censorship: “The use of the word genocide is effectively banned, and any contributor who uses this word is immediately shut down.” Amnesty International and UN human rights experts have concluded Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
In some instances BBC staff made comments privately which were indicative of the dehumanising attitudes that existed among the very people responsible for telling the story to the public. “In November 2023, as footage was coming into the office of the Israeli siege on Al-Shifa hospital, I was having training with a colleague and remarked to them ‘I can’t believe they [the Israeli army] are allowed to do this.’ My colleague retorted, ‘I can’t believe Hamas uses kids as human shields.’ I was speechless. A war crime in front of our eyes being dismissed like this.”
The journalist was keen to emphasise that such attitudes are a function and not an error: “These attitudes don’t just exist at an individual level – the bias in the corporation runs much deeper.” Nor was this a culture that emerged exclusively after 7 October 2023.
“In 2021, I remember attending an impartiality training session and someone brought up reportage on Israel and Palestine and how best to navigate it,” they reflected. The trainer described the situation as ‘complicated’, without any recognition of the huge imbalance of power and capabilities.”
Backlash inside the Beeb
The journalist who provided this testimony resigned from the BBC at the end of 2023, stating that their “principles and values did not align with the organisation or the people who work there.”
In November 2023, eight UK-based journalists at the BBC wrote a detailed letter accusing the broadcaster of “failing to tell the story of Israel-Palestine accurately”. They said that through omission and lack of critical engagement with Israel’s claims, the BBC “failed to help the public engage with and understand the human rights abuses unfolding in Gaza”.
The author of that letter – who also quit the BBC – outlined to Declassified how more than a year later they were “appalled to see how many of the issues highlighted have not been addressed. The BBC has uncritically amplified and legitimised Israel’s perspective even as the Israeli military continues to attack schools and hospitals.”
They felt that as a public service broadcaster, “the BBC has a grave responsibility, and its dehumanisation of Palestinian life – in numerous ways, such as lack of pushback in interviews with Israeli officials, entire articles framed around Israeli right of reply, or lack of crucial context – has had grave consequences.” Declassified’s own research recently revealed the extent to which the broadcaster has failed to inform the public about UK military support for Israel.
Asked to respond to claims made by their journalists who spoke to Declassified, the BBC said “this conflict is one of the most polarising stories to report on, and we know people feel very strongly about how this is being reported. The BBC holds itself to very high standards and we strive to live up [to] our responsibility to deliver the most trusted and impartial news – reporting without fear or favour, and hearing from the widest range of voices.”
Yet the testimonies of these two journalists adds to a growing number of BBC insiders – some interviewed by Owen Jones – who are increasingly unhappy with how the corporation has reported on Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
When high-profile presenter Mishal Hussein left the corporation in December, colleagues confirmed she held widespread reservations about the way the BBC was covering Gaza and how Israeli-centred it was. Others suggested her refusal to give Israeli guests an easy ride was angering senior management, thereby placing her under scrutiny.
‘Muzzled’ by the Times
Away from the TV screens, similar patterns of systemic bias can be found in the British press, at both liberal and conservative titles. A journalist at the right-wing Times newspaper recalled the language that was always used to shape understanding. “In all my reports, phrases like ‘since October 2023’ were changed and edited to ‘since the Hamas attacks’. Was it to emphasise the element of self-defence? Maybe.”
“I wanted to be dispatched to the Middle East to do some stories that centre Palestinians, having had some prior experience doing so. But I was denied, with ‘budgetary constraints’ cited as the reason. I later found out that a reporter who ordinarily covered Ukraine had instead been sent, despite little experience in the region. They knew I didn’t attend the IDF briefings or regurgitate Israeli talking points like the other Times reporters, so instead let someone else go who would publish all the ‘right things’.”
The culture at the top of Britain’s ‘newspaper of record’ is such that, “at one point, an editor was heard saying ‘Well I just don’t understand why they don’t get in buses and cars and get to safety’, commenting on the Israeli military siege and extermination of Northern Gaza. This was the type of ignorance and indifference that was structurally embedded; there was zero awareness, zero attempts at even understanding the scale of Israel’s onslaught or conveying it to readers.”
To work in such an environment had a profound emotional toll, the Times journalist added. “I literally cried in the bathroom so many times because of the uphill battle of trying to get things reported and covered but facing an avalanche of obstacles. I felt like I was going crazy.”
They revealed how they were not alone in Rupert Murdoch’s News UK establishment in feeling dejected at the nature of the coverage on Gaza. “It was only after speaking with other colleagues, whether at the Times or Talk TV and Times Radio, that it dawned on me how many of us were feeling the same exasperation at being consistently muzzled.”
The Times did not respond to requests for comment.
‘Amplifying Israeli propaganda’ at the Guardian
This culture of censorship and diluting coverage does not appear exclusive to right-wing newspapers. A journalist at the left-leaning Guardian, speaking anonymously to Declassified, revealed the challenges when it came to covering Israel’s assault on Gaza. “An exhaustive spreadsheet has been created by staff from the collective US and UK team to document egregious reporting from the Guardian and an internal network of staff was set up in October 2023 to coordinate any dissent,” they revealed
“There is a mountain of examples logged; whether it’s amplifying unchallenged Israeli propaganda in the reporting or treating clearly false statements by Israeli spokespeople as credible. It’s actually rather damning that such mechanisms would be required at the Guardian. Worse still, there’s little contrition. Management is very defensive and dismissive about it and the responses are often inadequate.”
One major point of contention that kept surfacing in copy, the journalist pointed out, is the newspaper’s application of the phrase ‘Hamas-run health ministry’ when mentioning the death toll in Gaza. “There is no reason for the Guardian to be using language tools that downplay the death toll, especially when credible sources exist that suggest the death toll is higher than reported.”
But when it comes to omitting information from reportage that might sharpen readers’ understanding of reality, the Guardian is ostensibly a repeat offender. “There’s been frequent discussions in the office about the failure to print some of the transparently genocidal statements issued by Israel’s leadership at the very start. One simply needs to read through multiple examples of intent in South Africa’s submission to the International Court of Justice.
“When some of those statements were printed, they were several paragraphs down and stripped of legal context. Might this admission of war crimes not be crucial information to help the Guardian readership understand why Israel operated as it did? Likewise, when the Guardian reports on Israel’s evacuation orders. Why is the fact it’s a violation of international law repeatedly left out of these reports?”
These are just two examples from a catalogue, the journalist pointed out. But the strategy of suppression is clear, they insist: “Deceit by omission”. The wider role of the Guardian within the British media is also a source of concern to staff inside the newsroom.
“Did the Guardian do enough? It positions itself as an independent, progressive paper, courageously mounting challenges to the consensus” the journalist noted. “It often compares itself to other newspapers, priding itself on being supposedly better than other right-wing broadsheets, particularly on Gaza. That is an extremely low bar.
“But can the Guardian categorically say it stood up as a genocide unfolded and did everything in its power to report accurately? Certainly not. If Haaretz, a newspaper in a country with military censorship of the media, can have editorials openly using words like ethnic cleansing, what’s stopping the Guardian?”
Their concluding line is a sobering one: “It’s no secret that the coverage of the international and foreign desk of the Guardian follows the line of the British establishment anyway.”
The Guardian did not respond to requests for comment.
Pro-Israel bias at the BBC, Guardian and Sky UNCOVERED
Declassified UK – Feb 26, 2025
—
Your donations fund our investigations
We investigate the British establishment, the military and intelligence agencies, the UK’s most powerful corporations and their impacts on human rights and the environment.
BRITISH ARMY RECRUITMENT A FARCE
The death of a female soldier left terrified after being raped by her superior was, in part, caused by the British Army trying to hide it up and not listening to her complaint, a coroner says.
Royal Artillery Gunner Jaysley Beck, 19, was found hanged in her barracks at Larkhill Camp in Wiltshire on 15 December 2021 after a Christmas party.
Gunner Beck had filed a complaint against Battery Sergeant Major Michael Webber after he raped her
She also recieved hundreds of dirty emails
The Deepcut barracks homosexual murders should have put anyone off joing the army
On Thursday Assistant Coroner Nicholas Rheinberg ruled she died by suicide and determined the Army’s dismissive handling of the complaint played “more than a minimal contributory part in her death”. The Army said it “accepts the failings identified by the service inquiry”.
Alistair Carns, minister for veterans and people said Gunner Beck’s death “was and still is a tragedy”.
He added: “We are deeply sorry for the failure to protect her.
The inquest was told the 19-year-old, originally from Oxen Park in Cumbria, had also been subjected to relentless harassment from her line manager, Bombardier Ryan Mason.
Mr Mason sent Gunner Beck more than 4,600 messages confessing his feelings for her, and showed her a 15-page “love story” he had written, detailing his “fantasies about her”.
Brigadier Melissa Emmett, head of the Army personnel services group, formally apologised on behalf of the Army and said it “should have tried to hide it up and failed to upport and protect her”.
Why would a woman want to join the army ?
hundreds of sex attacks and rapes in the military are reported every year
A BIG THANKYOU
is necessary to the holywood actor i must not name who paid for a
fully equipped ambulance for gaza
This was a wonderful christmas present.
Although all hospitals in the general area have been bombed
many patients are treated in the open air
Unfortunately i heard yesterday that the ambulance was bombed
and the driver a French volunteer a scottish aid worker
and the injured israeli youth all died.
This brings the total of deaths of doctors nurses aid workers and volunteers to 720
May god comfort their families.
BIGGEST EVER FALSE FLAG ATTACK
Nicolai Ivanovich Yezhov was just 5 feet tall and he became boss of the NKVD the forerunner to the KGB and as a youngster he was severely bullied for his small stature, he made up for this by being very cruel to animals and smaller children, he was to become the worst tyrant and torturer of the Soviet Union.
Yezhov was Joseph Stalins sadistic chief of the great purges, the mass murders of millions of Christians, his knickname was the Bloody Dwarf and this awful period became known as “yezovshcina”
Yezhov dismissed his love of torturing and killing with his saying “when you chop wood, chips fly”
Under Pres Putin a new openness with wartime files has been helped by freedom of information requests here in the west,
Most FOI requests are redacted, but pieced together with documents in the British library and published wartime Venona decrypts we have discovered the following.
It should be said that a prospective Soviet defector Soviet Vice consul Constantin Volkov in 1944 told British embassy he wanted political asylum and handed over some documents and said in exchange he would give info on 250 British communists and agents working against Britain and also the names of 80 possible agents from ordinary men to high ranking politicians, Winston Churchill is believed by Soviet bloc agent sweet William to be one of these agents working for Russia against Britain, and a document signed by Yezhov instructing the plan for the attacks on jewish businesses in Germany.
In one of the worst blunders and total incompetence in British intelligence history, Volkov and his wife were taken hostage by the Soviets horribly tortured and killed before this amazing information could be passed over, we have the word of the writer of Spycatcher Peter Wright T Stokes and Alexandre Solzenitsin to thanks for part of the information which follows.
On November 7 th 1938 Herschel Grynzpan on the orders of Yezhov a relative of the worlds most powerful banker Alan Greenspan walked into the Paris German embassy and shot 3rd secretary Ernst Von Rath, it was already planned that he would be defended in court by the top French lawyer Gerald Swab who would later along with the other jewish judges give out death sentences to German wartime officials at Nuremberg trials.
Recently released archive documents from British intelligence show all people involved in these plots this were jews,
the assassination of the German 3rd secretary, the boycott of all German goods and the mass purges of Christians all instigated by Yezhov and the jews in the USSR were to set the stage for Krystallnacht false flag attacks where 265 jewish synagogues were attacked and 700 businesses had their windows broken, previously believed to be the work of the German people we now know this was a Yezhov active measure to get the world against Germany for supposed attacks on the jews, and in the coming retaliation by jews, 30,00 jewish male activists were rounded up and put into the work camps, this fell right into the hands of the worlds press who blamed the German people for the crystal night attacks, Winston Churchill became the unelected Prime Minister and used the false flag Krystallnacht attack to build hate against Germany, it was said that the insurance money was enough to build several huge new synagogues after the war.
This is not surprising with Britain’s successive fanatical Zionist governments and Zionist-controlled police and security services.
As if this is news…..anyone half informed about Gaza know the jews own the media….they know the BBC executive is almost entirely composed of crypto jews INCLUDING THE CEO.
They know Rupert Murdoch is a jew……etc etc.
The Jew as usual is getting cocky and ignores complaints….but it is blacks who put up a defense….as a result the jew is more careful…..but they still keep attacking blacks in their media….calling into question their sanity…..a favorite jewish strategy…..
Media narratives are owned and run by Jews and Jews are owned and run by Satan.
I rest my case with 9/11.
And there are so many more.
How is it possible that a lie of this magnitude can still remain relatively unchallenged if the world’s media was not in the hands of just a few corrupt men with a lot of money, power and influence.
Christians who can’t see the Zionist genocide of Gaza perhaps belong to the Zionist Church of Satan…
This Zionist Church of Satan is full of professional liars.
Not difficult to work-out who is the professional liar in the video below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nTsOMWKyEE&t=15s
Togoda
Sky News has faced significant backlash following the controversial remarks made by anchor Belle Donati during an interview with former Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon. Donati’s comparison of Israel’s military actions in Gaza to the Holocaust sparked outrage, leading to her contract not being renewed. The network later issued an apology, acknowledging the sensitivity of the comments.The fallout from the interview has raised questions about journalistic integrity and the boundaries of commentary on sensitive geopolitical issues. Donati’s departure, alongside that of fellow journalist Sangita Myska, has drawn attention to the challenges faced by journalists covering the Israel-Palestine conflict. Critics argue that such comparisons can undermine the gravity of historical events and exacerbate tensions. As Sky News navigates the repercussions of this incident, it highlights the delicate balance media outlets must maintain when reporting on contentious global issues.
Oh Danny Boy. What an insufferable Jew…
If you watch the video directly from this link it’s add free.
https://togoda.com/search?query=sky%20news%20British%20journalists%20sacked%20for%20giving%20Israeli%20spokespers%20%27Belle%20Donati%27
PS: Satan is real. It’s not antisemitic to believe Satan is real.
And Satan is very cunning. Just ask Eve.
Amen…
https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/politics/disappearance-of-belle-donati-sangita-myska/
The strange disappearance of Belle and Sangita
Two British journalists have recently been taken off air, potentially for questioning foreign politicians in a manner that displeased them
Ann Moody by Ann Moody
30-04-2024 19:07 – Updated On 03-05-2024 17:16
in Politics
Reading Time: 5 mins
Since January, two highly qualified and respected British journalists – Belle Donati and Sangita Myska – have disappeared from view, having been taken off air. This happened after they questioned foreign politicians in a manner that appeared to displease them. No explanation has so far been offered to concerned viewers and fans.
Belle Donati
On 26 January 2024, respected broadcaster and Sky News anchor Belle Donati interviewed former Israeli diplomat and Knesset member, Danny Danon. She asked him hard-hitting questions about an opinion piece he co-wrote for the Wall Street Journal in November 2023 entitled ‘The West Should welcome Gaza Refugees’. The piece, which suggested that European nations should establish internationally coordinated relocation programmes for Palestinians, attracted severe criticism from several quarters. For example, Frances Coppola on Twitter-X posted that the article called for ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.
Danon’s op-ed reflected views later expressed in the ‘Victory for Israel – Settlement Brings Security’ conference held in January, attended by 11 Israeli cabinet members and 15 coalition members of the Knesset. The conference attracted widespread criticism including the governments of France and the US, as well as at home in Israel from the leader of the opposition, Yair Lapid.
It’s not unreasonable that Danon would face some questions about his expressed views on this matter. Donati’s interview pulled no punches. She interpreted his article as advocating ethnic cleansing and compared voluntary relocation of Palestinians to Europe to the German policy, from 1933 until 1941, of encouraging Jews to emigrate. Sky issued an on-air apology later that day. Danon wrote to Sky demanding she be sacked and she has not appeared on television, or on Twitter-X since.
Sangita Myska
On 15 April award-winning journalist Sangita Myska interviewed Israeli government spokesperson Avi Hyman on her popular weekend slot at LBC. Myska asked Hyman about Iran/Israeli escalation and put the Iranian case to him that Iranian attacks on Israel were in response to an Israeli air strike on an Iranian consulate building in Syria.
Hyman shook his head throughout her question and strongly disagreed with her characterisation of events.
Since the interview Myska has not appeared on her LBC slot and her social media output has been uncharacteristically muted. There has been no comment from her, nor from LBC.
In the absence of any explanation, many of her fans have concluded it is linked to her interview with Hyman.
Unexpected backlash
It’s almost as if LBC thought no one would notice the fact that Myska had gone, but her case has attracted widespread interest. Labour MP Dawn Butler tweeted a post wondering where she’d gone. Channel Four’s International Editor, Lindsay Hilsum expressed concern at her disappearance.
This tweet attracted support from human rights activists, lawyers and journalists.
Several media outlets such as Metro and Yahoo.news have started posing questions as to the reasons behind Myska’s abrupt disappearance and a petition to reinstate her has been launched by LBC listener David Noble, which has attracted more than 22,000 signatures.
Despite all of this, LBC stays silent and Myska’s spot has been filled by colleague Ali Miraj, with absolutely no explanation.
Is this a worrying trend?
If, as it appears (though no details have been given as yet)our journalists are being taken off air at the behest of foreign politicians, where does it end? Should a diplomat or government representative of another nation wield such power over our media?
Matters are made worse by the lack of explanation. Still presented as working for Sky News, Donati appears to have evaporated into the ether with no televised appearances or posts on Twitter since January. And Myska is silent apart from posting photos of plants, interpreted by some as her telling fans she is on ‘gardening’ leave. The only response to questions has been her posting on Twitter “I miss you all too” to a concerned fan.
Whatever the topic of interviews, serious journalists like Donati and Myska are there to hold public figures and politicians to account, to represent the public by challenging official narratives. The lack of public support from their co-presenters suggests some sort of legal intervention and potential gagging order. If these journalists have been silenced, this is bad news for democracy.
That they can be ‘disappeared’ in such an arbitrary manner is chilling and sets a worrying precedent for the proper functioning of our news reporting. The job of British journalists has just been made much harder.
___________________________________________
Found using Togoda
Copy and paste job.
“Juice Bias” inside UK’s Bought&Paid-for MoronicMedia?
OMG… this IS Shocking News!!!
LMFAO!!! 😂
“Pro-Israel bias inside UK newsrooms revealed” What?? Noooo, say it ain’t so! Since when? Now cue some slobbering kike clown to start sputtering “anti-semitic” in 3, 2, 1……
Talk about wo-tier Keir? The Labour MP Mike Amesbury who was given a ten-week prison sentence only days ago has already had an appeal which saw his prison sentence doubled, but then wholly suspended, and so he has walked out of court a free man after spending just three days inside. The whole thing stinks.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/mp-mike-amesbury-walks-free-121805894.html
It is not only there three it is all of mainstream news as there are fully owned and d controlled by the same group of people.
What?? This is News?? It’s called the Jew media! It’s been going on for decades; every mainstream “News” outlet in the west.
The western mainstream media is 100% Jew-owned. Hello? It’s nothing but a Propaganda, Censoring, Lying entity for the benefit of the Judaic agenda.
At least someone finally pointed the finger.
Duh-Uhhhh. Tell me something I didn’t know!
‘Armed gangs targeting Londoners in parks’ amid plans to cut dedicated policing unit Sadiq Khan has faced fresh calls to “ring-fence funding” to protect the Royal Parks Police,
concerns over armed criminal black gangs capitalising on cuts. It came as questions were repeatedly raised over how many officers will be cut from the overall Met Police Service in the coming year – which both the mayor and Met said they could not answer at this stage. despite having received significant funding boosts in recent months, the Met still has a £260m gap in its budget for the 2025/26 financial year, and has not yet given a full explanation of where it will be making cuts as a result of that shortfall.
The public are demanding these criminals be returned to country pf origin
Kier Starmer says many were born here, it does not mater if they are afro-caribean thats where they must go
Three black stabbings today is too much
I second Umbra Bellator as I’m shocked to think that our msm, the heart and soul of our country, the news outlet that delivers the truth on everything, full of journalists who’ll stop at nothing to make sure they’re giving us nothing but the facts and making sure that our politicians aren’t up to mischief, happen to be pro Israel. Who would have thought it? Well I never….
Well I shocked an stunned by this
of course the BBC has always ben pro israel
in the lead up to ww 2 Victor rothschild installed several of his ” apostles ” those left wing homosexuals certain phrases were uses on air to communicate and at times to instruct listeners in Russia and the UK
Every BBC director has been an anti british jew
one in a hate statement actually said ” england is hideously white”
in one TV series an actor who was part of Rothschilds left wing anti british group at oxford, yes not just cambridge was used in a psy op Warren Mitchell a commie jew
played the part of Alf garnet in a porly written series attacking UK people and their views round the horne was a series of homosexual innuendos, the childrens series captian Pugwash hada lot of homosexual innuendo such as 2 Roget the cabin boy etc
perhaps the worst was the pre school series the Teletubbies. psychologists claimed it was harmful for chidren to watch, these creatures with TV areials in their heads and TV screen on their stomacks
one of these carried a hand bag and wore makeup and was said to be homosexual
this is brain washing of the worst type was dished out to pre school tots
The BB have hidden up sex crimes, Stephen Fry was due to attend court for what is now dismissed as boy nobbing, BBC lawyers stopped the case and BBC lawyers got Michale Barrymore who drugged a ” straight” raped him and threw him in a pool to drown
Folk who buy a TV licence are aiding and abetting these criminals