The kikes are scared. And of course they have four ‘female’ kike ‘navigators’. Wimmin’s lib eh kikes? Almost no damage. Typical kikery. Ha Ha Ha.
MM
on October 27, 2024 at 9:56 am
Israel’s Direct Attack in Iran| Jaw-dropping Footage Shows Fighter Jets Preparing to Launch Failure
FIFY.
Erik Blessing
on October 27, 2024 at 12:43 pm
Just testing Iran’s airdefenses and pychological warfare ..
Voltman
on October 27, 2024 at 2:07 pm
Jaw-dropping footage? Only in its inane stupidity and infantile pretense!
The only footage worth considering will come from real people using their cameras on site. All states utterances are disposable wastes of time and space.
“One India News “…??!! Garbage!
———————————————–
“America does NOT stand with Israel. The only Americans gullible enough to “stand with Israel” are:
1) Members of Congress who are AIPAC whores and get paid off to obediently stroke off Israel on command.
2) Elderly evangelical Christians who all got brainwashed by the Scofield Bible into thinking Zionists will somehow save Christians.
3) NEOCON war mongers who want to blow up the whole world and don’t care who does it as long as people die and weapons manufacturers’ stock values rise.
Aside from those pathetic groups, NO REAL AMERICAN supports Israel’s genocide, violence, deception and parasitic consumption of U.S. resources. Israel is not America’s “greatest ally,” it is humanity’s greatest enemy.
EQUATE ALL BOMBS + MILITARY INDUSTRIAL
COMPLEX WITH ROTHSCHILD-ROCKEFELLER MAFIA !
MM
on October 27, 2024 at 3:47 pm
Some are saying that because the US had ten airborne refuelling tankers servicing Israeli fighter jets then the US was directly involved in the Israeli attack on Iran. I doubt it was US involvement which deterred an Iranian response as they’re more level-headed than that. It appears it was a nothing burger but it will have yielded much intel about these tankers… where they flew from and to, altitude, air speed, where they met up with the fighters and so on. That alone will valuable in case war does break out, and then there’s all the intel on the fighters delivering the bombs. Lots to analyse for taking just a few slaps.
already since okt 23 it was an utmost necesscity
to destroy all israely airplanes . but not one got
lost to menace civilians . all hooty, hezbollah, Iran
fighting was only shadowboxing in this regard !
ACCOMPLISHED NOTHING !
israeli airpower most be cripeled totaly !
antiJHWH
on October 28, 2024 at 6:11 am
Israhell uses jordanian airspace if not even jordanian
aerodromes so Jordania is at war with Iran !
Harry John Marsh
on October 28, 2024 at 7:37 am
sorry this is a bit long
The ransacking of Britain:
Why the people finally rose up against ‘the sod you brigade’
Story by Simon Jenkins
Starmer is not alone/
The interview did not go well. I was in Liverpool as a journalist being shown a model for the city’s future by its proud architect, Graeme Shankland. I told him I regarded his city as the most magnificent port in Europe. He corrected me and said Liverpool was “glaringly obsolete”. His plan, produced in 1965, was to demolish two-thirds of the city centre as well as much of Everton, Toxteth and Sefton. A new metropolis of concrete and glass towers and slabs would rise, pierced by swooping motorway overpasses and tunnels. A few historic buildings might be allowed to survive.
I was horrified and said so, making a tactless reference to the RAF’s “Bomber” Harris and his war crimes. I was much moved by a visit I had just made with a colleague to see a similar scorched-earth project in Manchester’s Hulme. We watched as Mancunians were herded on to buses with their belongings, to be dumped miles from their old homes on out-of-town estates. Many were in tears or dazed. We compared them with wartime refugees. They were to make way for Europe’s biggest council estate, Hulme Crescents, its blocks bizarrely named after Georgian architects such as William Kent and Robert Adam.
Corbusier’s dream was of vast blocks of buildings as ‘machines for living’. He became a cult figure to young architects and was to head the ” young communists ” school after the war
we should have kept out of.
Liverpool and Manchester were not alone. A similar plan was under way in Glasgow, where the city engineer Robert Bruce was about to drive 25 miles of motorway, including the M8, through the centre. A cluster of eight towers of council flats would rise at Red Road, said to be the highest in Europe. At the same time in Birmingham, most of the Victorian centre had simply disappeared, including the main market, the central library, the Liberal Club, Mason Science College and the Bishop’s House. An urban motorway took their place.
London was no exception, although progress on Patrick Abercrombie’s 1944 plan was slow in starting. Like Liverpool, it was based on the thesis that the existing city was obsolete, Communism for the people was the new mantra.
Traffic volume forecasts demanded five rings of motorways and 10 radials, destroying more houses than had been lost in the blitz. Apart from selected “villages” and famous buildings, most of the centre would be cleared. Whitehall was to be demolished from Downing Street to Westminster Abbey. A tunnel would run from Parliament Square to Aldwych. Also set to be demolished were Carlton House Terrace, Piccadilly Circus, Covent Garden, Fitzrovia and Bloomsbury. Shopping hubs would be replaced with large traffic gyratories. A glimmer of humanity lay in the proposal for a small green belt and “green wedges”.
Abercrombie’s plan for London – and for other cities such as Plymouth, Hull and Coventry – had been inspired by the utopian collectivism of the Swiss-born architect Le Corbusier. He became a cult among young interwar British architects. The stylistic debates between classicists and gothicists, neo-Elizabethans and neo-Georgians were cast aside. Le Corbusier’s dream was of vast blocks of buildings as “machines for living”. His bare modernism took hold of architecture schools and town-planning departments. After the war, the doctrine was that the nation should start afresh
There is no doubt that, by the end of the 1960s, there was a growing reaction against this radicalism. Its cost to the taxpayer would be enormous. Modernist style had lost the cool elegance of the interwar Bauhaus school. Cities now erupted with the so-called brutalism of concrete and asbestos council estates, shopping centres and motorways. Le Corbusier’s aversion to streets, which he thought fostered disease, and the isolating of people into flats high in the air, turned architecture into social engineering, exemplified by London’s Barbican.
Shankland’s Liverpool vision soon collapsed for lack of money, though not before 30,000 habitable houses had been cleared and the city’s population nearly halved. Manchester’s Hulme Crescents proved a disaster. Within two years, they were declared unfit for families and were eventually demolished as they were impossible to let. Replacing them would cost £400m, the people began to reject modernism communism and faceless walls of concrete.
Newcastle council’s assertive leader, T Dan Smith, began to demolish the city’s Georgian Grainger Town but was jailed for corruption bribery and boy-nobbing. In Glasgow, the Red Road towers were uninhabitable. In 2014, there was a plan to celebrate the opening of the Commonwealth Games in the city by blowing them up. Instead, they were more discreetly demolished. In south-east London, Thamesmead new town was so unpopular it was eventually privatised in 2010. The new owners, Peabody, claimed it needed £1bn to become lettable.
jamesbalderson1991@gmail.com
on October 28, 2024 at 8:07 am
The kikes are scared. And of course they have four ‘female’ kike ‘navigators’. Wimmin’s lib eh kikes? Almost no damage. Typical kikery. Ha Ha Ha.
Israel’s Direct Attack in Iran| Jaw-dropping Footage Shows Fighter Jets Preparing to Launch Failure
FIFY.
Just testing Iran’s airdefenses and pychological warfare ..
Jaw-dropping footage? Only in its inane stupidity and infantile pretense!
The only footage worth considering will come from real people using their cameras on site. All states utterances are disposable wastes of time and space.
“One India News “…??!! Garbage!
———————————————–
“America does NOT stand with Israel. The only Americans gullible enough to “stand with Israel” are:
1) Members of Congress who are AIPAC whores and get paid off to obediently stroke off Israel on command.
2) Elderly evangelical Christians who all got brainwashed by the Scofield Bible into thinking Zionists will somehow save Christians.
3) NEOCON war mongers who want to blow up the whole world and don’t care who does it as long as people die and weapons manufacturers’ stock values rise.
Aside from those pathetic groups, NO REAL AMERICAN supports Israel’s genocide, violence, deception and parasitic consumption of U.S. resources. Israel is not America’s “greatest ally,” it is humanity’s greatest enemy.
-The Health Ranger, Mike Adams.
https://t.me/KenanSonOfEnos/1904
https://t.me/KenanSonOfEnos
EQUATE ALL BOMBS + MILITARY INDUSTRIAL
COMPLEX WITH ROTHSCHILD-ROCKEFELLER MAFIA !
Some are saying that because the US had ten airborne refuelling tankers servicing Israeli fighter jets then the US was directly involved in the Israeli attack on Iran. I doubt it was US involvement which deterred an Iranian response as they’re more level-headed than that. It appears it was a nothing burger but it will have yielded much intel about these tankers… where they flew from and to, altitude, air speed, where they met up with the fighters and so on. That alone will valuable in case war does break out, and then there’s all the intel on the fighters delivering the bombs. Lots to analyse for taking just a few slaps.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/iranian-media-pundits-mock-nothingburger-israeli-attack-involving-100-warplanes
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/u-s-deploys-at-least-ten-air-refueling-strato-tankers-to-middle-east-israel-iran-attack
already since okt 23 it was an utmost necesscity
to destroy all israely airplanes . but not one got
lost to menace civilians . all hooty, hezbollah, Iran
fighting was only shadowboxing in this regard !
ACCOMPLISHED NOTHING !
israeli airpower most be cripeled totaly !
Israhell uses jordanian airspace if not even jordanian
aerodromes so Jordania is at war with Iran !
sorry this is a bit long
The ransacking of Britain:
Why the people finally rose up against ‘the sod you brigade’
Story by Simon Jenkins
Starmer is not alone/
The interview did not go well. I was in Liverpool as a journalist being shown a model for the city’s future by its proud architect, Graeme Shankland. I told him I regarded his city as the most magnificent port in Europe. He corrected me and said Liverpool was “glaringly obsolete”. His plan, produced in 1965, was to demolish two-thirds of the city centre as well as much of Everton, Toxteth and Sefton. A new metropolis of concrete and glass towers and slabs would rise, pierced by swooping motorway overpasses and tunnels. A few historic buildings might be allowed to survive.
I was horrified and said so, making a tactless reference to the RAF’s “Bomber” Harris and his war crimes. I was much moved by a visit I had just made with a colleague to see a similar scorched-earth project in Manchester’s Hulme. We watched as Mancunians were herded on to buses with their belongings, to be dumped miles from their old homes on out-of-town estates. Many were in tears or dazed. We compared them with wartime refugees. They were to make way for Europe’s biggest council estate, Hulme Crescents, its blocks bizarrely named after Georgian architects such as William Kent and Robert Adam.
Corbusier’s dream was of vast blocks of buildings as ‘machines for living’. He became a cult figure to young architects and was to head the ” young communists ” school after the war
we should have kept out of.
Liverpool and Manchester were not alone. A similar plan was under way in Glasgow, where the city engineer Robert Bruce was about to drive 25 miles of motorway, including the M8, through the centre. A cluster of eight towers of council flats would rise at Red Road, said to be the highest in Europe. At the same time in Birmingham, most of the Victorian centre had simply disappeared, including the main market, the central library, the Liberal Club, Mason Science College and the Bishop’s House. An urban motorway took their place.
London was no exception, although progress on Patrick Abercrombie’s 1944 plan was slow in starting. Like Liverpool, it was based on the thesis that the existing city was obsolete, Communism for the people was the new mantra.
Traffic volume forecasts demanded five rings of motorways and 10 radials, destroying more houses than had been lost in the blitz. Apart from selected “villages” and famous buildings, most of the centre would be cleared. Whitehall was to be demolished from Downing Street to Westminster Abbey. A tunnel would run from Parliament Square to Aldwych. Also set to be demolished were Carlton House Terrace, Piccadilly Circus, Covent Garden, Fitzrovia and Bloomsbury. Shopping hubs would be replaced with large traffic gyratories. A glimmer of humanity lay in the proposal for a small green belt and “green wedges”.
Abercrombie’s plan for London – and for other cities such as Plymouth, Hull and Coventry – had been inspired by the utopian collectivism of the Swiss-born architect Le Corbusier. He became a cult among young interwar British architects. The stylistic debates between classicists and gothicists, neo-Elizabethans and neo-Georgians were cast aside. Le Corbusier’s dream was of vast blocks of buildings as “machines for living”. His bare modernism took hold of architecture schools and town-planning departments. After the war, the doctrine was that the nation should start afresh
There is no doubt that, by the end of the 1960s, there was a growing reaction against this radicalism. Its cost to the taxpayer would be enormous. Modernist style had lost the cool elegance of the interwar Bauhaus school. Cities now erupted with the so-called brutalism of concrete and asbestos council estates, shopping centres and motorways. Le Corbusier’s aversion to streets, which he thought fostered disease, and the isolating of people into flats high in the air, turned architecture into social engineering, exemplified by London’s Barbican.
Shankland’s Liverpool vision soon collapsed for lack of money, though not before 30,000 habitable houses had been cleared and the city’s population nearly halved. Manchester’s Hulme Crescents proved a disaster. Within two years, they were declared unfit for families and were eventually demolished as they were impossible to let. Replacing them would cost £400m, the people began to reject modernism communism and faceless walls of concrete.
Newcastle council’s assertive leader, T Dan Smith, began to demolish the city’s Georgian Grainger Town but was jailed for corruption bribery and boy-nobbing. In Glasgow, the Red Road towers were uninhabitable. In 2014, there was a plan to celebrate the opening of the Commonwealth Games in the city by blowing them up. Instead, they were more discreetly demolished. In south-east London, Thamesmead new town was so unpopular it was eventually privatised in 2010. The new owners, Peabody, claimed it needed £1bn to become lettable.
BARCLAYS BANK SPONSORS ISRAELI TERRORISM
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2024/10/27/736105/Barclays-bank-Gaza-Israeli-genocide-protes