Kit Knightly – Off Guardian Aug 15, 2024
In the wake of the Southport attack and ensuing riots, we wrote that the agenda had become clear – it was about attacking free speech.
Little did we suspect how quickly they would move, and how brazenly authoritarian they would become, culminating in quite literal show trials for facebook posts:
—
All while the so-called “liberals” are applauding and spouting phrases they don’t realise they’ve been hypnotised into believing through endless repetition.
“Tolerating intolerance just leads to more intolerance in the end.”
“Free speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences”
“It was never an absolute right”
If it wasn’t obvious from the outset, it’s quite clear now that this entire situation has been a contrivance.
As it turns out it was a masterfully played hand that has perfectly set up the template for other governments who may want to crackdown on free expression in the future.
- Violent Incident – A terrorist attack, bomb threat, violent murder or some such hits the headlines. The incident can be real or staged, it makes no difference.
- Push “Misinformation” – Publish an intentionally falsifiable narrative of the above via anonymous accounts or non-mainstream sources, and use bots and shills to spread this “fake news”.
- Foment violence – Again using sock puppets and your bought-and-paid-for “alternative voices”, encourage disorder. Use undercover agents on the ground to direct and gradually inflame this situation until it becomes violent.
- Debunk “Misinformation” – Release the “real story” of the inciting incident, contradicting the initial “misinformation” you deliberately seeded (see #2).
- Blame Social Media – Through your controlled media, broadcast the idea that social media “amplified” the original “misinformation” (that you planted) and it is therefore to blame for the violence.
- Arrests – Begin arresting people for online comments (again, these can be real or fake, it makes no difference), but ensure the comments are unpleasant or stupid enough most people won’t defend them.
- Show trials and sentencing – Sentence people to prison for posting jokes and opinions on social media. Whether this is performed or actual, the desired effect will be the same.
- Legislation – Push through new legislation on hate speech etc. (or, in the UK’s case prepare to “revisit” legislation passed last year).
- Enjoy your precedent – Bathe in the adoration of people who should know better, enjoy your precedent and be ready to re-use it whenever you want.
That’s the base plan. You can tweak it to add specifics to suit your agenda, for example, today in the UK they are trying rehabilitate the reputation of the police, attempting to rebrand them as “those brave boys who faced down the far-right”, rather then “those tools of the state who locked us down for no reason”.
But the great thing about this template is it can be adapted for any situation, all you need to do is plan the attack and riots accordingly.
Right now the UK has a new “Labour” government, eager to prove its “leftist” bona fides, so the stoked unrest was anti-immigration protests, allowing for a clamp down on the “far-right”.
Next time, in the US, maybe a cop allegedly shoots a black suspect who is reportedly unarmed, sparking BLM riots – but oh no, it turns out the cop was black too and the suspect WAS armed, “leaked” CCTV proves it.
Cue arrests of “far-left” BLM supporters calling for attacks on police or tweeting “All Cops Are Bastards” or anyone who spread the “misinformation” that the suspect was unarmed.
…you get the idea.
*
As is the way of things in the modern media landscape, even the opposition to the crackdown is heavily controlled, with a fake binary set-up between Starmer’s government and Elon Musk’s X.
An authoritarian globalist stooge or an oligarch military contractor. Do you think either of them is on our side?
Twitter/X is no bastion of free speech, and labelling it thus is just a way of controlling dissent….but we’ll talk about that more next time.
—
Support Off-Guardian:
I got some way…
The main problem is that thicko sheeple have very deep prejudices, and they don’t understand why they hold these positions, and they don’t have the skills to articulate, and target the criminals who have deliberately created the debt based economy we live in.
I’ll give examples to context and contrast. On this site we have many who focus on the Joos, the Roths, ect. This kind of over direct targeting doesn’t achieve anything, because it’s much too central. If you want to impress the fringe, then you need to be much more subtle.
So we have all these thicko sheeple who have literally voted for the mess they find themselves in, & then crudely attack immigrants and Muslims, and this is all amplified by the Nazi deep state and Nazi fake news media.
The thicko sheeple should be directing their feelings towards the Nazi police state, chanting that MI6 assists the immigrants, that MI6 are WW3 war mongers, that the City of London is run by City Crime Cartels, and that MPs are crooks, who don’t work for the sheeple. If the sheeple were chanting these things, they are true, and can’t be refuted by our Nazi elites.
As usual, Kit and his rag are simply amplifing what the Nazis want.
In under two months since he was installed Dear Leader Starmer has brought in imprisonment for saying something ten years ago when it wasn’t illegal to say it back then. Apart from the fact it’s become illegal to say some things, the UN should denounce this like it used to do with the legal excesses of other banana republics. We tag along in others’ wars but with no defence forces we don’t quite cut it as a military junta.
What superior being is supposed to administer Free Speech? There is none, and your speech is as free as you make it; clever people can get their point across without being imprisoned, and higher powers may be helping you. No-one who spoke about Free Speech was honest, it is so unrealistic. The people in power are “free” to insinuate that their enemies should die
The trough of truth makes a comeback in moments!
Ohhhhh, what a pretty costume! And that wig!!!! I must have missed that fancy dress party.
What do you mean “he” is the law? Which one? The one that always upgrades itself according to where the herd of commercial sheep has to move?