Kit Knightly – Off-Guardian July 11, 2024
In my previous article, Why you should never believe your eyes, we discussed new technologies that make the creation of literal “fake news” more possible than ever. In this follow up we’re going to discuss the potential benefits of faking the news vs creating the news.
A false flag operation is generally defined as ”an act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility and pinning blame on another party”
The phrase originates in naval warfare, when ships would literally fly a flag of another nation’s navy.
Historically speaking, they are covert military operations carried out with the aim of creating a cassus belli, either initiating, justifying or perpetuating a war.
The attack is very real, only the flag is false.
But recent years have seen the rise of a new idea – the false false flag. That is to say – entirely fake “events” with only the barest relationship to objective reality. Blanks and crisis actors, fake victims and fake shooters.
This concept has been the subject of discussion recently, with the civil suit against Alex Jones for calling Sandy Hook a “hoax” and the on-going trial of journalist Richard D Hall in the UK for suggesting the Manchester Arena bombing was fake. Similar suggestions have been raised about the Boston bombing of 2013 as well. Others, including Riley Waggaman, have raised questions about the recent “terrorist attack” in Moscow too.
Now, I’m not definitively claiming any or all of those events were faked – though of course they may have been. What I’m pointing up is the shift in discussion.
But then, we don’t need to look far for the greatest provably “fake event” in recent times: “Covid”, which was purely a construction of media hype and corrupt science creating an entirely fake pandemic.
Once you’ve absorbed all the facts of the case, that’s the only interpretation that stands up to scrutiny.
In fact it was such a vast infestation of fakery it spawned mini-fakes. It wasn’t so much a fake event as a flock of fakes of varying sizes.
Covid alone proves that the powers-that-be certainly do engage in staged or faked events. And, as highlighted in the first part of this series, it’s been known for decades that news reports are regularly faked, on both the small and large scale.
Yet, still, the question that gets asked whenever the possibility of fakery is invoked is “why?”
Why would a state apparatus with the power to really do something, opt to only pretend to do it?
This is a standard argument made against the idea of state-sponsored fakery, and although it is logically flawed as being purely an argument from incredulity, it is a question we can and probably should endeavour to answer.
So – why would the state, or powerful actors within the state, choose to fake something rather than simply do it?
Clearly we can rule out moral or ethical considerations. That shouldn’t require further explanation. The state has no objection to causing suffering, that has been demonstrated over and over again. It wouldn’t shrink from sponsoring a real terror event just because real people would end up dead.
Indeed, a “fake event” doesn’t even necessarily preclude real death – as (again) “covid” has shown us.
The “pandemic” was entirely fake but those allowed to die through inaction or directly killed by DNRs, denial of care or ventilator-abuse were real.
As was the very real and often very fatal fallout of lockdown and other “anti-Covid” measures.
But, if not a moral objection to inflicting real death and/or suffering, then why would a fake event be perceived as a better option? What benefits does fake have over real?
Well, here are some possibilities for consideration:
- You can’t prove a negative. A fake event, in an odd way, is harder to disprove than a real one. It is quite easy to show the official explanation for a real event is false (think 9/11). But if there is no real event, only a story, then there will be no inconvenient facts to challenge you. And of course it’s virtually impossible to prove a negative – an absence of existence.
- Lack of physical evidence. An extension of point 1, but a fake event cannot be forensically traced back to real culprits. Real gunpowder and explosives are traceable and leave real chemical residue. Fake events have none of this baggage.
- Keeps your options open. A real event is bound by the physical realities of the situation. Your story must try to fit those facts. A fake event is open ended and can fluidly change as the needs of the story changes. Again, we saw this with Covid.
- No real victims. A real shooting or bombing creates real victims and leaves real grieving families who might demand investigations and ask awakward questions (see the 9/11 victims’ families). A fake event has only fake victims who are on your payroll, not only will they never ask awkward questions they are incentivized to conceal the truth.
- Less guilt or regret. Institutions and agencies don’t have consciences, but individuals do. It is generally easier to persuade “foot soldiers” (literal and metaphorical) to pretend to hurt people than to actually hurt them. It’s an extension of the single blank in the firing squad.
- Easier to control. An entirely staged event is easier to control than a real event. For example, a real pandemic disease might fade away too quickly or not be deadly enough. Worse still, it might kill the wrong people – you or your family. A fake disease kills exactly who you say it killed and no one else, and can go away or come back as your need dictates.
Those are all just practical considerations, of course. We haven’t even got into the more unknowable world, the potential psycho-social motivations of what we call the global deep state.
What might be the victory conditions of this psychological war “the Elite” are waging against the people of the world?
As I noted in my article The Perfidious Unreality of the New Normal, observation would suggest a deliberate agenda of undermining the very idea of objective reality. A move by our controllers to insert themselves as a filter between every person on the planet and the world they experience.
The final aim being that everything – everything – the entire fabric of our shared reality – is made up?
Because that is the ultimate demonstration of total control?
Here we come to the point where we should address the key difference between a staged event and real one – the target.
If you need a President dead, you can’t pretend to shoot him. If you need to claim terrorist insurance, you can’t pretend the buildings fell down.
A fake event can only be a preferred possibility when your aim is purely optics.
In other words, the real target of a fake event is always the audience.
It’s always a psychological attack aimed at our perception of the world or of certain groups of humans, or certain alleged dangers.
With the advent of AI generative technology, deep fakes, voice synthesizers and the like, the fact of the matter is we can likely expect a great flood of “fake news” sold to us as real – because why not? Why wouldn’t this option be utilised at least sometimes?
The questions moving forward are – how far has it already gone or will it go? And are we prepared enough psychologically to be able to tell the difference?
—
Support Off-Guardian:
Not read.
The UK Nazi deep state recently carried out terror drills along the lines of a Mumbai style false flag, or Westgate Plaza farce.
The Nazi deep state likes to put new Nazi regimes under the thumb, so they jump the right height, and direction. So watch this space. My guess, is going to happen during Nazi regime Summer Recess, so minister must leave the families on holiday. You know, we’ve seen this many times.
So what can we expect. Well, my long stand feeling, held for many years, is that MI6 wants a duration false flag terror attack, such as Mumbai, which lasted 4 days. ‘IF’ this were the case, we could expect a national cerfew, and in the immediate vacinity/region, a total lockdown, and yes, that means dogs pissing and shitting in your hallway. So if you live in London, or another large conurbation, then old towels, good bin liners, and doggy training pads would be a good idea.
In conjunction with this lockdown, you should expect service disruption, or no services. So that’s water, Internet, power, and they blame cyber attacks.
By me saying this, they could get cold feet, as they’ve done in the past, but I think it will happen. There are so many Nazi benefits from this kind of Nazi operation. Sheeple conditioning, fear, impressing other Nazi regimes, and many new rules and laws. Oh, and don’t forget, putting Red Nazi Labour MPs on notice.
It was clear years ago they’d have to stop filming false-flag operations and just claim they happened “because we and the media say so”. Without training in film-making techniques they were always bound to make a mess of it with a production so flawed it can be pulled apart by anybody. We don’t need to be experts to notice some errors if they go against what we experience every day, such as a figure inserted in the wrong place that casts no shadow or no reflection in a shop window, while stage blood has its limits because it behaves so much differently to real blood. It doesn’t stay bright red for a start.
They did have to produce phony footage for a while because it was too big a leap of faith to go straight into claims of false-flag events without having some footage. And EMTs filmed during an exercise later passed off as a real atrocity will be risking their lives to step up and say that wasn’t real. Now if there’s a FF mass-stabbing they can show stills from another FF stabbing to “prove” this one was real too.
Brilliant article and so factual.
Good example of a “false flag” is the military operator acting as “The Biden” .. most boobus americanus think he is real. “False flags” are mil. special ops like Gaza, Ukraine and the “coming” scare event, WWIII, is the mother of all false flags ..
Kit Knightly states:
“This concept has been the subject of discussion recently, with the civil suit against Alex Jones for calling Sandy Hook a “hoax” and the on-going trial of journalist Richard D Hall in the UK for suggesting the Manchester Arena bombing was fake. Similar suggestions have been raised about the Boston bombing of 2013 as well. Others, including Riley Waggaman, have raised questions about the recent “terrorist attack” in Moscow too.
Now, I’m not definitively claiming any or all of those events were faked – though of course they may have been. What I’m pointing up is the shift in discussion.”
Of course all of them were inside jobs. You have to be a complete and utter moron to think otherwise.
There’s more holes in all of the ‘official’ stories than a bloody termite infestation in a wooden barn for crying out loud.
But why did they go after Alex Jones? BECAUSE ALEX JONES IS 100% CONTROLLED OPPOSITION that’s why. With all his millions, his very expensive legal team, HOW IN THE FUCK could he have missed this gem of a video, available on Bitchute for all to see?
SANDY HOOK – DAVID WHEELER EXPOSED AS ACTOR AND FAKE FBI SNIPER
This video not only destroys the official narrative but it shows HOW MANY crisis actors were involved in this attempt, by the US government, to have the people support their removal of the 2nd amendment so that Mr Hook Nose can implement Bolshevik takeover MkII. Like I said, how on earth did Alex Jones completely miss David and Francine Wheeler?
And here’s the interesting part; there were two cases against Alex Jones – the Connecticut and Texas cases. The total awarded in Connecticut was $965.8 million and the number of plaintiffs was fifteen (8 families and 1 FBI agent). The total awarded in Texas was $49.3 million and the number of plaintiffs was two.
List of compensation to plaintiffs:
Robbie Parker (father of Emilie Parker): $120 million
David Wheeler (father of Benjamin Wheeler): $55 million
Francine Wheeler (mother of Benjamin Wheeler): $54 million
Jacqueline Barden (mother of Daniel Barden): $28.8 million
Mark Barden (father of Daniel Barden): $57.6 million
Nicole Hockley (mother of Dylan Hockley): $73.6 million
Ian Hockley (father of Dylan Hockley): $81.6 million
Jennifer Hensel (mother of Avielle Richman): $52 million
William Sherlach (husband of school psychologist Mary Sherlach): $36 million
Erica Lafferty (daughter of school principal Dawn Hochsprung): $76 million
FBI agent William Aldenberg: $90 million
Jones was also ordered to pay punitive damages.
David and Francine Wheeler have both have gone on to be advocates for gun control under Obama, have given numerous TV and print media interviews, as well as seminars across the USA especially on school shootings. Both, wannabe, failed actors, got their big break selling out their country to Mr Hook Nose pocketing $109m for the Alex Jones lawsuit and they’re still raking it in, being the charlatans they are.
And the law suits didn’t stop with Jones either. They sued Remington Arms, the manufacturer of the AR-15 style rifle used in the hoax and because of it are now no longer in business. They also sued the estate of Nancy Lanza, the mother of Adam Lanza (who never existed) citing negligence in not securing the firearms, her son used in the hoax. Nancy Lanza was said to have been killed by Adam Lanza during the event. Interestingly enough she’s alive and well. Now there’s a shock! A bit like all those who died in the Challenger Shuttle Explosion back in 1986 and as usual, out come the fact checkers to deny the crazy conspiracy theorists. Yes, Snopes actually thought they’d tell us that there’s nothing unusual about finding absolute doubles and the exact same age (with similar names) of the dead astronauts.
The deception is horrific.
There definitely needs to be an in depth investigation into the ‘Russian targets Childrens Cancer Hospital’ media psyop one day prior to Starmer’s NATO Conference.
Not saying it wasn’t damaged- but it wasn’t this –
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/10/14/the-kunduz-hospital-atrocity/
Great article which proves yet again governments are huge and complex criminal operations.
Come Nov. 5th which representative will you vote for to lie and gaslight you?
Trump the slavish Zionist whore of the Adelsons?
Joe Biden, instigator of Zionist wars in Ukraine and Israel?
How can any moral person vote when both candidates are pure evil?
Author wonders why ZWOG stages these ‘fake false flags’. Simple, it keeps the attention of the white masses focused on these State/Media orchestrated fake events (Sandy Hook/7-7/Moscow bombing/Oct 7 Hamas etc) for years discussing/dissecting them– rather than organizing to remove the Jews, Commies & wogs from their nations.
Apparently, someone has gone berserk with a crossbow. Whether this was real or not, I do not know. I have long lost the patience to scrutinise the minutia often offered to demonstrate hoaxes. Suffice to say, I observe for reasons of “application” rather than “humanitarianism”, TPTB have decided that fake victims — actors — are less messily deployed.
IF it the crossbow business had all been fake, I surmise the same reason for the Sandy Hook fake event. During the Scamdemic lockdown, I bet many people bought crossbows and the like on the basis of not knowing how far TPTB would “push”. Maybe this too — like Sandy Hook — is such problem~reaction~solution as well. And maybe, Scamdemic 2 is on the horizon? If the crossbow event was real, it in no way invalidates the truth that hoax atrocities are committed…
And speaking of hoaxes, Richard Hall persists despite the state’s persecution of him for blowing the top off the fake Manchester “bomb”:
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=313&part=1&gen=99
Thinking aloud on the lexicon we use, the article header speaks of a “false false flag”. Fair enough. The pedant in me wants to define:
1/ A false flag is either a hoax(*) or an event involving real victims(**), whose objective is the blaming of non-perpetrators, thereby generating “pressure” for a “solution” against the wrongly accused.
* Boston Marathon, “Manchester bombing”
** 9/11, 7/7, attack on the USS Liberty…
2/ A hoax can be perpetrated with the intention of generating a reaction, but may not be a false-flag. It will usually be motivated by the want to generate a reaction. For example, the Apollo hoax.
But the emotionally unhinged duped masses of developmentally immature morons will still continue to say; “see, the telLIEvision says so!” without ever realizing anything beyond the images projected right to their (lack of) brains! The saturation of stupid non-thinkers perpetually stuck at (maybe) eight years old shows how ripe UNcivilization is for the “harvest” or Revelation. Jesus LIVES!!!!!
https://youtu.be/ZSGLdNsQt2s?si=lycbl-jRxb_W6dE-
False Flag (feat. Sean Chris)
Brian on July 12, 2024 at 2:51 pm
I hope you’re right, Brian
The movies ‘Manchurian Candidates’, ‘The Sting’ & ‘Spanish Prisoner’ along with the classic ‘Mission Impossible’ tv show are good training films on how to layer deception upon deception- to create an unreality that foils the enemy target’s planned action. Even the iconic ‘I Love Lucy’ comically showed Ricky & Lucy outsmarting each other via staged fake outs.
But to use false flagging against regular citizens for purposes of directing our minds to agree with the results of a phony situation is evil.
Not read Carl Jones
The title of the article made me think it was saying that governments might get the public to think it’s a False Flag when it isn’t
Mr. Smith. X-bow,the same mechanism as that used in the delivery of quaxxines .a holder and an arrow,a syringe and a needle.the father of the quaxxine;djt,was often pictured as the archer, Sagittarius,as he initiated op.warp speed.
.