Introduction – May 17, 2024
It should be noted that when Israel launched its operation into Gaza, Prime Minister Netanyahu assured Israelis that “total victory” was only “weeks away”..
More than six months after Netanyahu’s initial prediction, Israel is far from “total victory”.
Instead, with hundreds of Israeli soldiers killed in an inconclusive campaign, Israel now has to face the prospect of a bloody stalemate, at best. If not defeat and maybe even the end of Israel as a viable nation state, at worst,.
This may explains why the following report from a Zionist owned news outlet makes wildly over-estimated claims about Hamas losses. As when it reports that “it is fair to assume that from each battalion of 1,000 (Hamas) people, some 300 would have escaped”.
You can be sure that if Hamas has suffered such casualties, of more than 70 percent, it would be more than ready to come to terms with Israel. It is not. Ed.
How the wheels came off Israel’s Gaza invasion
Nataliya Vasilyeva – The Telegraph May 17, 2024
When the Israel Defense Forces announced Hamas had been “dismantled” in northern Gaza, the troops had good reason to believe that their job was done.
In the densely-populated neighbourhood of Jabaliya, the devastation from weeks of heavy fighting was extreme. Entire streets and blocks no longer exist, replaced by deep craters created by Israeli air strikes and demolition crews.
Despite the destruction, Hamas has mounted a resurgence in the area, bombarding Israel with rocket fire from the ruins of the city.
On Wednesday, Jabaliya was once again swarming with Israeli troops.
Markava tanks from the 82nd Battalion of the IDF’s 7th Brigade had led the charge, advancing deep into what was once the largest refugee camp in Gaza.
Paratroopers of the 202nd Battalion brought up the rear, occupying the ruined buildings as they sought to root out the resurgent Hamas terrorists.
At 7pm, a tank crew, on high alert for signs of an ambush, spotted the barrel of a rifle sticking out of a building and unleashed two shells from the vehicle’s 120mm main gun.
They had no idea the building was the field headquarters of the 202nd battalion’s deputy commander. Five Israeli soldiers were killed and another seven were wounded, three of them seriously.
Wednesday’s friendly-fire incident, detailed by Israeli media on Thursday, brought the toll of troops who have died in the war against Hamas to 278.
The Sisyphean war
It is also symbolic of what Israeli troops say is increasingly becoming a Sisyphean task as they retread already scarred ground in northern Gaza, dealing with resurgent Hamas in the same areas they captured months ago.
With Israeli generals now openly briefing against the country’s civilian leaders and decrying the lack of a political objective for their war effort, a sense of futility has begun to permeate the Gaza offensive.
Herzl Halevi, the IDF chief of staff, last weekend reportedly lashed out at Benjamin Netanyahu for refusing to come up with a “day after” strategy for running Gaza.
“We are now operating again in Jabaliya. As long as there isn’t a diplomatic move to develop a governing body in the Strip that isn’t Hamas, we’ll have to act again and again in other places to dismantle Hamas’s infrastructure,” Channel 13 quoted Lt Gen Halevi as saying. “It will be a Sisyphean task.”
The IDF would not comment on the reports.
The sense of futility surrounding the Gaza operation was further underlined earlier this week by a top White House official, who said the United States did not think Israel could achieve a “total victory” against Hamas, in a clear rebuttal of the promises of Mr Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister.
Washington does not think that a “sweeping victory… is likely or possible,” Kurt Campbell, the US deputy secretary of state, told an event on Monday.
Tensions between Mr Netanyahu, to whom fresh pockets of Hamas activity are evidence of the need for a “total victory” in Gaza, and his critics, who are alarmed by his refusal to allow a new civilian administration to oversee the enclave, have exploded into the open.
Yoav Gallant, the defence minister, broke ranks on Wednesday to challenge Mr Netanyahu, urging him to “make tough decisions” and come up with a strategy to absolve Israel of the task of occupying Gaza – something seen as vital for ending the war.
At the same time, fighting has intensified on Israel’s northern border, raising serious questions about where the war is going.
Army left vulnerable by political indecision
The lack of a clear set of political objectives or criteria for ending the war appears to have put the Israeli military in a vulnerable position, forcing it to react to threats rather than pre-empt them.
“Our Israel army doesn’t know what to do: If you want us to create a military regime, please tell us; if you want us to occupy this area, we need to understand that we have to take the responsibility for the civilians,” Yohanan Tzoreff, a terrorism expert and former Israeli government adviser on Gaza, told The Telegraph.
“That’s the reason why the IDF left Gaza City in the first place. And when you leave a place, the terror organisation will come back and want to show they’re still in power.”
In comments echoing those grievances, Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, said on Wednesday that Israel needed a “clear and concrete plan for the future of Gaza” as “we cannot have a vacuum in Gaza that’s likely to be filled by chaos”.
But Mr Netanyahu snapped back a few hours later, saying it was “pointless to talk about the day after while Hamas is still intact”.
“There is no substitute for military victory,” Mr Netanyahu said. “There is only one substitute for victory – defeat. My government will not agree to this.”
Deja vu
But frustration with the elusive war goals is felt on the front line, too.
During most of this winter, Israeli troops took their time to regroup and focus on the remaining area under Hamas’s control including Khan Younis, which was captured in April, and Rafah, where the IDF started operating only last week.
Israeli troops largely withdrew from the north and centre of Gaza, having decimated Hamas battalions there and destroyed what at the time was thought as most of their infrastructure, including tunnels used to store weapons and provide shelter for the fighters.
But the IDF has had to scramble and go back to several of those areas in recent weeks and go back into battle with Hamas cells.
In mid-March, the IDF had to deploy to Gaza City’s Al Shifa Hospital to wrestle back control of it from Hamas as they discovered regrouped Hamas forces there, including a senior commander who was subsequently killed.
On Saturday, the IDF issued evacuation orders for Jabaliya and went back to the densely populated neighbourhood following intelligence indicating Hamas forces were gathering there.
The IDF’s 196th battalion are having déjà-vu moments in Jabaliya, where they fought for an entire month in November.
“It’s frustrating to see this, seven and a half months after the war began,” one of the company commanders in the 196th Battalion inside Gaza told Haaretz newspaper earlier this week.
“But it looks like we have to come back and take care of each individual rocket launcher.”
However much firepower Israel uses in Gaza, the army still assumes that it would have to go back in to deal with new pockets of fighting, active and retired military personnel said.
When the IDF first started operating in the north, the goal was to destroy organised points of resistance, but it is fair to assume that from each battalion of 1,000 people, some 300 would have escaped.
“We need to reach a point within six to seven months when the IDF reduces the infrastructure of terror to such an extent that it will look very much like what we see in the West Bank,” said Brig Gen Amir Avivi.
Israeli forces, backed by air strikes that caused a staggering loss of life and devastation of the area, took control of most of the Gaza Strip in less than three months of fighting by early January.
Keeping up the pressure
Once Israel has removed most of the weapons and Hamas infrastructure, it will be able to cut down the number of troops inside Gaza dramatically.
The main stumbling block to reducing the level of hostilities in Gaza lies in Rafah, the only city in Gaza untouched by fierce fighting that also hosts about 1.4 million people where Hamas is still believed to have several organised battalions intact.
But it increasingly appears that Israel will not be able to launch a fast and ferocious invasion of Rafah as international opposition to it, including from the US, is hamstringing the Israeli government.
Israel’s hesitation to launch a full-scale operation on Rafah is playing into Hamas’s hands, emboldening it to regroup, the Israeli military fears.
“One principle of the war is always be in attack mode and keep pressuring the enemy,” Brig Gen Avivi said.
“When they see [an operation is] not continuous and you’re not pressuring them all the time, then it gives your enemy time to reorganise and regroup,” he said.
“They see they can’t win on a battlefield. They rely on international pressure to stop the war – and this is working for them not bad at all.”
By contrast, for the time being at least, Israel’s troops must fight on without a clear view of how the conflict will end.
I think Israel is over as a state. The process of its failure has begun. Most of the people who live there will find it an intolerable place to be after realising the things they’ve said and done are unacceptable to most of humanity and they can’t walk them back or lie about context. They’re digitally captured for all of history.
Boycott and divestment by global consumers will impoverish the economy even if sanctions aren’t applied, and whatever the percentage of people abandoning a place before it collapses, Occupied Palestine once known as Israel, may collapse within the next decade. Then only Jews who lived there before 1948 will want to remain with their Palestinian neighbours as it always was their home and they didn’t kill anyone.
It’s possible if they haven’t killed that many freedom fighters they’re not resurgent Hamas but a regrouped Hamas, in that they’ve remained strong mostly moving around underground to survive the bombings and have not had many open clashes with the IDF cowards. It serves the lying propagandists to say there aren’t many left now; then when/if it becomes clear there are plenty of them left they’ll just lie their way out of that lie by claiming foreign fighters have moved in and these are ISIS or some new Islamist bogeyman.
Not be long before ‘genocide’ will be hate speech.
Genocide, hate speech
Self defence, love speech.
They will need a very compliant media to pull that one off.
Good news
Then nobody will believe it.
“Total Victory”–maybe they should try putting victory on a spectrum, where it belongs
Who will take them in? The reason countries supported the state in the first place was to get a bulk of them out. That would be roughly 7 mil back in circulation.
Who will take them in? The reason countries supported the state in the first place was to get a bulk of them out. That would be roughly 7 mil back in circulation.
If you pay attention .. you see History being written .. it will be studied for generations to come ..
While the Jewish nature of Israel is often foremost in the thoughts of many of us, a further level of abstraction might cause us to reflect that Judaism is a convenient vehicle for a deeper more insidious philosophy not circumscribed by an Iron Age chauvinistic belief system; not precluding that those who conduct their deeper purpose are not unlike higher level, for example, free masons presiding over their rank and file brethren…
During the nineteenth century Britain engaged itself in what became known as the “Great Game”. The (((British Empire)))’s modus operandi was to always play one power off against the other on the Eurasian land mass according to who was the “greatest threat”. Once this was France, then it was Russia, then it was Germany. Diplomacy became something of a board game. Within this scheme of things, the USA has to be seen as an inevitably rising power in which Britain tries to treat as a younger naive more muscular brother that it tries to steer then eventually to toady towards.
One articulation of this seminal study of geopolitics was drawn up by Halford Mackinder who wrote “The Great Pivot Of History”, subsequently taken up Zbigniew Brzezinski who maybe because of the problematic task of pronouncing his name, often slips under the radar. He wrote “The Grand Chess Board” as an update to Mackinder’s ideas. Now, Mackinder described Eastern Europe as this “Great Pivot”. The power of railways threatened the means by which the continental powers might either come together, or one conquering the other, and thereby challenge the British Empire and the future American led (((Anglo))) hegemon. Indeed William Engdahl cites the Berlin Baghdad Railway project as a reason for Britain’s entrapment of Germany prior to WWI. Previously, Britain had tried to stymie the Russian Trans-Siberian railway. Trains were supposed a big threat to the “maritime powers”
So touching upon this great Eurasian land mass, and the area of geopolitics is the idea of “land bridge” into the greater “world continent”. Palestine is one of these land bridges. That there are rank and file Jews who see this as a return to the “Promised Land” is a convenience for the deeper planners.
All this forms the background for Guido Giacomo Preparata “Conjuring Hitler”, whose thesis I have been studying in recent weeks. The overarching idea is that Britain deviously guided Germany to destruction. His idea is in the same ballpark as Henry Makow’s general ideas, but the latter is missing out an awful lot. I must say, I’m glad for the Makow material, although now I feel I may have gone beyond it. A significant difference being that Hitler was duped rather than being a conscious agent of Great Britain. Makow has also regarded the Third Reich as a “project” to oppose the Bolsheviks. The reverse is more true. I will give a few bullet points based on Preparata’s thinking:
1/ The British Empire identifies Germany as the threat to its own hegemony through its industrial prowess and continental proximity. One major aim is to sew the seeds of enmity between Russia and Germany, as well as bringing France into the project with the “Triple Entente” of 1907.
2/ The Wiley old British Empire suckers Germany into become the “visible aggressor” in 1914. For all its scientific and engineering ability, German statesmen throughout the first half of the twentieth century are continually very politically naive.
3/ The Allies impose an impossible reparations payment scheme on Germany in 1919. The deeper idea is to be able to drive the German economy and political process in order to achieve a reactionary government. Preparata documents the varies capital flows driving events. Incidentally, the Walls St crash is suggested to arise as the lower interests needed to attract capital to England and then on to Germany in her build up. Germany became the second industrial power in the world but absolutely dependent on short-term financing because of the requirement to also honour the Versailles reparations.
4/ Previously, in 1917, the Allies machinations removed the Czar who was threatening “peace” with Germany on the Eastern front. The replacement Alexander Kerensky would “hopefully” rally the Russian army to keep fighting Germany. It didn’t work out. The Western powers make the best of a bad job and help the Bolsheviks as a long term project to create a communistic threat to the German aristocratic/reactionary system. The Germans understandably knowing of the Bolshevik’s immediate plans to end the war are also convinced to help with the Lenin and Trotsky project. This always confused me as to why the Germans and Allies helped the Bolsheviks. The Germans would always seems to play the “short-game” and the Allies the “long-game”.
5/ The emergence of Adolf Hitler and Mein Kampf lauding the British Empire and the natural quest for Lebensraum in the East marked out the NSDAP/Hitler as a natural candidate for financially helping to power. Hitler’s future banker was Hjalmar Schacht a friend of Montagu Norman, the governor of the Bank of England. It was Schacht who led a delegation of bankers and industrialists to pressure President Hindenburg to make Hitler Chancellor. The National Socialists had gained 33% of the votes, but were still the largest faction.
6/ After Hitler assumed leadership, he combined the role of “chancellor” with “president” to become Reich’s Fuhrer. He might suppose the injection of international capital enabling industrial and economic build-up was Anglo-Americans equipping him for war in the East. Preparata describes how the era of so called “Appeasement” in the mid to late 1930s, together with the false promotion of a significant Anglo coterie who were pro German and anti Bolshevik, encouraged Hitler to believe he would be given carte blanche in Russia.
7/ Hitler and Germany’s big delusion was that they believed the Communists were the ultimate foes of Western capitalism. He did not know that the West had simply made gestures of supporting the White counter revolutionary faction while actually supporting the Reds twenty years before. When Hitler let off the British army at Dunkirk, it was not because he was a “British agent”, it was because he believed there was a nascent British faction who would “see sense”. The parachuting of Hess into Scotland also factors into this world-view.
8/ The final act while Hitler is probably hoping that Britain will “see sense” is the invasion of Russia and Britain holding back the more muscular but politically naive USA from crossing the channel until the powers that hold the fate of the Eurasian continent have beaten the crap out of each other. The phony cold war will commence soon when the backward inefficient Soviet Union will depend on Western capital. But the main thing from the POV of the (((Anglo-Americans))) is that Germany has been led to self-destruction. It is almost like an Old Testament story of deceit; maybe like Jacob and Esau.
Within the long-game Britain for some inexplicable justification ruled over Palestine following the defeat of Germany’s Ottoman ally in WWI. As the baton of imperial power was passed to the USA from Britain, notwithstanding the international banking links and common capital holding among the “elite”, my opinion is that Zionists who were riding on the HMS Great Britain see sufficient ideological distance between themselves and the deluded British Israel cults to steer the ship differently by being independent “Israel”, albeit as a financial protectorate of the USA. This entire arrangement suiting the international bankers, who are only incidentally Jewish, in order to attempt Eurasian hegemony. I maintain ordinary Israeli are just cannon fodder themselves.
It is difficult to assess the degree of existing world hegemony. The difficulty of tracking down who the major holders in such as Blackrock and Vanguard becomes problematic. When the US came into the war in 1917, a major reason was because their bankers wanted to make sure they would be able to redeem their debt. Now, we observe the Chinese hold significant American debt. Under what circumstance then would China risk this by going to “war” with the USA? This is how the tentacles of international capital make a mockery of the boundaries of nations that serve only as to delineate the areas national footballers may represent. Once can only guesstimate as to the spreading of the tentacles to what extent the ruler of say Russia and China are on board with the same BS as the West.
On the face of it, it might seem the geographic pivot is being fought over in Ukraine. On the other hand the dispersion of capital across national boundaries among the “elites” begs many questions of these limited theatre wars that have occurred since WWII. Preparata suggest the Anglo-American establishment “won” the Great Game in 1945 and we now live in the post geopolitical era.
***
There is a “dark inner stillness” IMO involved in the machinations of the Middle East and elsewhere. Passions involving the condemnations of “Jews” fall against carefully erected outer fortifications. The real enemies are not rabid Israeli flag wavers or guys with stupid beards and hats. The passions invoked in our current times are not useful for those who succumb to them.
Don’t worry about it, everything is going according to plan. TTS or Rixon doesn’t understand that Oct 7 was an IDF-Hamas blackop/psyop & everything that proceeds from it is staged/planned out as well to advance Jewish power/control. It was all a hoax. No Jews died on Oct 7, no ‘hostages’, nor have 1500 Israelis been killed in Gaza, nor 35,000 Palestinians been iced either. Welcome to 1984.
Problem: Oct 7 IDF-Hamas black op/false flag
Reaction: Jew organized ‘pro-Palestinian’ protests
Solution: ‘Anti-semitic’ speech laws in US
now you know the game, thanks to me
The ‘last’ thing Bibi wanted was victory in a matter of weeks. We now hear 10 year narratives. lol
While Hamas wasn’t colluding with the Nazi Joos, they did knowingly walk into the Nazi trap, and to be honest, they had no choice.
Do nothing, get crushed, do something, and here we are.
A short bout of genocide, and Mr & Mrs Netanyahu would now be in prison, or in a Florida condo, and Israel would be in a state of civil war.
Ask me, it’s all gone to plan, but most US and UK Nazis see this as a massive geopolitical distraction from UKraine, Russia and China.
Go back more than 20 years, and I was writing in my comments on here about this huge swing in power to China and Russia, as we’ve just witnessed in Putin’s truly historical visit to China.
Russia and China have been forced into this now very tight geostrategic relationship where both parties publicly display as a matter of necessity for their mutual survival, and the survival of the NFW (New Free World), which you could call the BRICS, and the many countries lined up to join.
This isn’t even a close balance of geopolitical power. The imbalance between the Nazis, and the NFW is so great, it makes a nuclear WW3 much more likely.
As far as tactical nukes and Nazi threats in UKraine, the Russians have made all the necessary planning and decisions, that any red line crossed by the Nazis, means the instant use of tactical nukes, against Nazi targets in UKraine, but also in Romania, France, Poland, Germany, and Nazi UK.
No idea what the French will do with their nukes, probably nothing. The US won’t let the UK use Trident, and in my view, the US won’t lift finger.
Hamas is a Mossad front, the Oct 7 attack was a false flag, Hamas has been a Mossad front for decades and this is well known in intel circles.
simon smith
problem with this greaseballs theory you’re promoting is point 2 where ‘British Empire suckers Germany into being visible aggressor in 1914’
Nobody was suckered since both States were covertly owned/governed by the same international cabal of Jewish central bankers..it was a collusion, not a trick…thus the dagos whole theory collapses..The real purpose of WWI & WWII were demographic (not economic) i.e., to liquidate white men.
“You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, wich is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of wether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit Priest.”
Winston Churchill
Well .. Hitler succeeded ..
@Crowley
First of all. Yes he is Italian. Are you hoping to persuade by using epithets that discourage an Italian from being taking seriously? You seem to be indulging in truth by proclamation for the most part.
I agree there are transnational ties that bind the brotherhood of bankers together. They have increasingly come to be more hands on as their vehicles such as the CFR and Trilateral Commission have got going.
Are TPTB bothered about demographics? Yes and no. The primary aim of the psychopaths is power. Their modus operandi is understand human desires, weakness, and passions to construct a strait jacket for us all from these. They may be sadists, but their overarching quality is the desire for power. One distilled aspect of power is money and the money trail. The secret of dissecting power lies within the rather dry areas of accountancy and book keeping, but from my experience the more ideologically flavoured rhetoric on race can be more entertaining to “engage the crowds”.
When I was an elected councillor I wished I had had the sense to look through the figures and try and spot connections between land developers and Labour councillors. These latter while being quite dull and devious yet have a disposition that it really isn’t about ideology at all but about the brokering of this distilled quality of power known as money. A Labour councillor two stone’s throw away from me was just an ordinary health worker but somehow came to own two houses before the fat bastard sadly popped his clogs at a young age. The drive for power/money is the operating principle from the Rothschild right down to corrupt local councillors. And you know, this is the driving force for most people most of the time.
You think in terms of race. They don’t think in terms of race except to manipulate those that end their analysis with race. These include their own brethren as well, although I believe the “top Jews” are equally disdainful of their colonists in Palestine. “Race” is a tool within the “power game” itself. When your reference frame is solely race itself, you become food for the gods.
The liquidation of White men doesn’t preclude other motivations.(Look up the story of the three blind Indians who when feeling different parts of an elephant and argued over what it was they are with.) “Spanish Flu” (vaccinations) killed more than bombs and bullets in WWI. Just because we may be viewing different parts of the elephant doesn’t many there is isn’t some overlap between us. You mention “collusion” between bankers. Indeed, so do I in my summary while the pizza chomping ice cream seller gives a timeline of collusion between New York and London to facilitate the movement of capital to invest in 1920s/30s Germany.
@ Simon Smith and Crowley
Actually you are both right, for both of your ideas are just the 2 sides of the same coin. Through Jewish / Central Bankster / Khazarian Mafia machinations both goals are achieved. One, the destruction of the white race ( European descendants who would be Christian , whether Catholic or Protestant ) to eliminate one religious enemy of the Jew / Judaism / Phariseism / Kabbalah, while the other religious enemy is Islam. The second is to achieve the victory of the Eurasian landmass with the Globalist HQ in Jerusalem. The only question is will this HQ be controlled by European monarchs with help from judaiized Jesuits and the Vatican Pope or will it be controlled by the Khazarian Mafia and the Banksters and their fake Jewish Messiah ,
Meshiach or AntiChrist. Even Islam has a Messiah and he is the Mahdi / Dijjal. In any case, it is the Eurasian landmass and the remaining countries of Europe, like the original members of the European Coal and Steel Community, that will decide this outcome once American hegemony has been removed from Europe. It will be these countries that will jump and join Russia and China in this Eurasian Landmass power. America and Great Britain have been using their naval strength for centuries to prevent this Landmass power from forming. And again Jerusalem will be the hub of this landmass power.
After all, both the Ukraine – Russia war and Hamas – Israel war are being done to destroy NATO, America and some of the European countries as American vassels, so that this Eurasian landmass power can form right before your eyes. And surprisingly, Germany is at the center of this in Europe as the original Rothschilds were German Ashkenazi Jews., from Frankfurt.
Finally, if you look at the murals at the Denver International Airport, the freaky horse statue with the blaring eyes and the paintings by Abramovich for the Rothschilds some of the above makes sense.
A lot from Simon Smith, making it complicated, but it is not, as we see in Simon’s triple-bracket admission that the Anglo power is Jewish. Without all the ancient Supremacy ideas, there is no Judaism nor Jews
@Lewis Jones
Yes, it can seem complicated. The degree to which we seek to penetrate a subject and share it depends on our own disposition. Without Judaism and Jews there would be some other materialist philosophy masquerading as religion with which to form part of the machinery of world hegemony. The problem with solely invoking the “Jews” is like naming the murderer in Cluedo and being too lazy to name the weapon (international banking and its dynamics) and the room (the Eurasian continent etc.) Sometimes this laziness involves not differentiating between International banker Jews and common or garden Jews, who are as ignorant as anyone else. It is satisfying to feel we have the final verdict on an issue and we can then move on without needing the trouble to examine deeper; more so if the shallower interpretations of events square with our passions.
The extent to which something can be discoursed in lengthier passages or mantra style sound bites is both a condition of the writer and the reader. I always pitch my prose towards those who may be like myself. It may mean there are few readers. My main comment is an attempted distillation of a book a few hundred pages long for those few who are interested.
We are fellow travellers up to a point. I understand from your other posts you may be a little older than the rest of us and understandably probably don’t have the energy for detailed study and reading, relying on the judgement and experience you have acquired – and why not. At least your short passages don’t challenge attentions spans. I’ve given up reading some regular posters’ comments to be honest. I’m sure I’m on a few peoples’ “scroll by lists” myself 🙂
@Stormin Norman
I don’t believe Crowley is wrong. He assumes he putting an opposite position to myself when my perspective also can incorporate his worldview. My main point is that power and power brokering is of more primary than race in understanding how the world works. People who start and end their analysis with race can become unwitting puppets for others. Race is important. My hometown is a constant reminder of ethnic and cultural alienation. The roots of this alienation arise from cheap labour above and beyond the sensibilities of the indigenous population. The nineteenth century produced long factory hours and pollution for the sake of profit. We now have a different challenge.
As difficult as it is, I believe the way forward is to accept the world we have and work together against the top-down divide and conquer operation. It may therefore be that it isn’t globalisation per se that is wrong, but just the people presiding over it. I can at least conceive of a fairer world where people are content to reside within their native lands and not descending monetary gradients and necessarily causing demographic friction. And this is one thing nationalists get wrong, you can’t have a perfect home nation regardless of the condition of other lands. The exploitation of India by British elites has had an “interesting” karmic payback.
Norman–
Not exactly..like most people you fail to understand that America/Great Britain & Russia/China are controlled by the same supranational syndicate of Jewish bankers/oligarchs/rabbis–managing/concealing their global control behind ‘nations’ & wars.