HenryMakow.com – March 28, 2024
Good Friday–According to the politically correct view now in vogue, the Pharisees of 33 A.D. were more sinned against than sinning.
Christ’s Crucifixion is still happening today. Christ was crucified because he taught that God is Love; God loves all people equally.
Judaism believes Jews are Chosen by God. In fact, they believe they ARE God.
We know they killed Christ because they never stopped defaming him and stamping out his Gospel of Universal Love.
Christianity believes that all people are intended to express their Divinity. Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. (Matt 5:48)
Jews believe non-Jews were created to serve them!
“Nowhere does the Talmud or Moses Maimonides, the supreme halachic authority for western Talmudists, blame the Romans, as do the modern popes, many Protestant “evangelists” and the corporate media. There are literally thousands of spineless academics and clerics on the Left as well as the Right who minimize the role of the Pharisees, the progenitors of the Talmud of Babylon, in the killing of the Son of God, putting the onus instead on the Romans and Pilate.”
Scapegoating the Romans and Pontius Pilate for Killing Jesus
by Michael Hoffman – (abridged by henrymakow.com)
According to the politically correct view now in vogue, the Pharisees of 33 A.D. were more sinned against than sinning.
Among falsifiers on the Right, are two luminaries in the ersatz “Conservative” firmament. Former Fox News talk show host Bill O’Reilly promotes the manifestly ridiculous Romans-are-to-blame-for-the-Crucifixion imposture in his book, The Last Days of Jesus.
He’s not alone. Andrew P. Napolitano, better known as “Judge Napolitano,” a widely admired figure among “Conservatives,” wrote a column on Holy Thursday in which he had the temerity to state:
Adolf Hitler was a verry spiritual man
he brought in the law of protection of children and animals act
his vegetarian chef was jewish
those jews who were loyal to germany were protected
more jews were loyal to germany during the war than in the UK
the jews were responsible for millions of german deaths including adolf hitler
The blame game is silly, considering that Jesus goes to Jerusalem to provoke the Authorities with the money changers, get tortured and killed, get resurrected, and thus fulfill Scripture, all voluntarily, or in obedience to God
We are still going on about all these religions which were created to control and set different tribes against each other. Sure Jesus represents humanity and integrity but let’s leave it at that. By the way the Jew word did not exist until the year 1755. The old bible has many inserts and is fraudulently translated to benefit the so the imposters. The new bible has been completely rewritten and again to fool the Christians and benefit the same imposters. The so called Jews started calling themselves Hebrews in 1860 and rebirthed the Hebrew language which was in the dustpan. The old history of Egypt, Greece, Russia and Rome were completely remade and rewritten from the 8th century to the 17th century AD. And the present Western history from the 8th century to the 17th century has a 1000 years add to it that never existed. I can accurately guess which tribe carried this out as to fool the gullible and in turn benefit from all the lies. Can you guess who did it?
Yes..
…NO philosophy says ‘Love’ better than one in which a jealous jewish God that represents a plurality of Gods and incidentally is a tad jealous…that runs an Eternal torment and punishment racket for none be=lie-verse..sends himself to Earth as his own Son to be tortured and murdered by swizzlers so he wont have to torment and punish you all for eternity…
Then gives the Whirled to the swizzlers who murdered him… as you turn the other cheek in supplication..(and greed)..
and there’s still plenty of torment and punishment to go around whilst you wait for his ‘Return’ (like the Spring Son/Sun)..it certainly seems to be the case from where I’m standing…
Good Luck..
In the interests of truth, I have to defend the Judeans of that era. That their internationalist brethren have subsequently captured Catholic and Protestant denominations is a given. That banking has been captured by internationalist Jews is a given. That they are behind innumerable schemes, false flags, and genocides is also a given. In defending them on this issue, I emphasise again, it is in the interests of truth. Truth demands that even a people from whom a disproportionate number of the enemies of the world have been drawn, should not be indicted for something they did not do. They didn’t do it because it didn’t happen.
From my own study, including but not limited to the work of Joseph Atwill, it becomes apparent that the Romans sought to leverage the mindspace of religion against the (rebellious) Jews. They did this by joining Mediterranean stoicism, that to its credit did suggest a more universal God than the tribal Yahweh, with the chauvinist Old Testament tradition. In passing, I make the point that the biblical Jews are Sephardic. They are not the Rothschild Ashkenazi crime syndicate. A recent TTS article describing an American Ashkenazi Jew married to an “Arab” Jew described similar issues.
The creation of Christianity as a mindspace weapon would also serve like a Macdonald’s burger franchise, whereby the Christian kings emerging from the “Dark Ages” could sign up to the stoic slave based philosophy. In return for allowing the Roman Empire as the Roman Catholic Church to still effectively occupy land in say Britain, France, and Germany while collecting tribute, it could supply kings with divine right aka the right to flip franchise approved burgers. The threat of “eternal damnation” proved more cost effective than direct occupation by Roman Legions. “Render unto Caesar” etc.
A Christian king was not regarded as top-dog. Henry VIII used the pretext that the mythical King Arthur — an “ancestor” — was actually an EMPEROR of Britain, when breaking with Rome. Henry’s older deceased brother was called Arthur, and so I wonder whether a break with Rome was something on the minds of medieval kings for some time. King John tried to tax the Church and they withdrew their burger flipping concession by refusing to conduct masses and funeral etc. When the king’s actions “endangers your immortal soul” it creates an upward pressure that is not particularly welcome; best stay on board with the protection racket and send tribute to Rome – at least for now…
If you don’t read anything but the Bible — a translated work anyway — you will not know this. You will not want to know this.
(Touching upon the Pharisees mentioned in the article, there is inconsistency in the gospels about whether they were good guys or bad guys. I recall something like St Paul was a Pharisee and therefore material suggested as coming from related sources, praised the Pharisees – Luke’s gospel I think. If I am wrong on this particular I ‘ve placed in parenthesis, it should not be used as a stick to hit the more general points I give above. I mention as a potentially interesting sidebar, and illustration of the inconsistency of a Christian narrative that always performs contortions in order to present itself as non-contradictory.)
The Greek and Egyptian God on which Jehova or Jove is an analogue (The King of the Gods who with his Brother Saturn breathed the Uni-verse or one Word of the swizzlers)…explained far more satifactorily the capricious whims of this God of the sky, mountains and thunder…
Remember Moshe Moses and where he found the Deity dwelling?… That’s because most of the Good Book is purloined from real cultures by a group of criminal terrorist desert bedouhins with deep pockets..who left out all the good bits..
Remember where it all comes from..this Eostre/Ostara (Goddess of spring and hehe rebirth)… and Spring Equi-nox..
The Gaza genocide may lead to awkward accusations from the UN against the US and UK. Fransesca Albanese who recently presented her report ‘Anatomy of a Genocide’ says she is investigating arms sales from both countries to see if they are used to enforce Israel’s genocide and to “determine their complicity”. It would be something if to save their faces the US and UK must now trash the UN, the very vehicle they have both used countless times to give their wars of conquest and plunder a veneer of legality.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz78E6ZQbBU
When Pilate believed they would choose Barabbas.
Was probably only then, when he had to make it official.
Is it not written due to “jealousy the Jews handed Christ Jesus over to Pilate”? The Jews are narcissistic abusers as is ” their father the devil” as is also written. The narcissist constantly demands others validate their reality, and when that does not happen they lose their minds! Satan can only live VICARiously through others, period, with or without informed consent! Satan (and its mimions) uses covert contracts, implied consent and “strings attached”. Did not “Satan enter into Judas” as is also written? Jesus LIVES!!!!!
“From The Bible, speaking of the Jews regarding Jesus Christ: John 11: 53-57 “Then
from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death. Jesus therefore
walked no more openly among the Jews. Then sought they for Jesus . .. Now both the
chief priests and the Pharisees had given a commandment, that, if any man knew where
he were, he should shew it, that they might take him ”. John 70:6,7 “J esus answered
them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?” [He spoke of Judas
Iscariot the son of Simon, an Edomite, – Hitchcock, author of The Synagogue of Satan]
Mt. 26;14-16 “Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests,
And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they
covenanted with them for thirty pieces of silver . .. Then the band and the captain and
the officers of the Jews took Jesus, and bound him.” John 18:28-31 “Then led they
Jesus from Caiaphus unto the hall of judgement: Pilate (the Roman procurator in
Judea) asked of the Jews, “What accusation bring ye against this man?” John 18:34-40
“They answered and said unto him, If he were not a malefactor, we would not have
delivered him up unto thee.” Following interrogation, Pilate “went out again unto the
Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all.” Yet the Jews would not relent
pressuring Pilate, John 19:1-22 “Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them,
Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may find that I find no fault in him. When the
chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out saying, Crucify him, crucify
him. Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him.”
Pilate, for his conduct, was removed from the position of Procurator and banished by
the Roman government to Vienne, in southern France, where he committed suicide. Mt.
27:3-5 “And Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he (Jesus) was
condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief
priests and elders (in an effort to reverse his action), Saying, I have sinned in that I
have betrayed innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? And he cast down the
pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.”
What of the remaining eleven disciples who had spent over three years in close
relationship with Jesus? John was banished to the Isle of Patmos where he wrote the
Book of Revelation. It is recorded he was thrown into boiling oil, but survived and
returned to Ephesus, Turkey, where he either died an old man, or was murdered. The
records are unclear. All the rest were pursued and murdered under the direction of
powerful Jewish leaders in Jerusalem who deemed the disciples guilty “by
association”.
Historical records reveal Bartholomew was skinned alive and beheaded; James, the
Lesser was stoned and clubbed-to-death; Andrew was crucified upside down on an
X-shaped cross; Simon Peter was crucified upside down under Nero’s direction;
Thomas was impaled on a spear; James, the Great was beheaded; Phillip was crucified;
Matthew was burned-to-death; Jude Thaddeus was sawed or axed to death; Simon the
Zealot was sawed or axed-to-death.”
http://scannedthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/the-12-apostles-skinned-stoned-cruci
fied-and-beheaded/ and h ttp://www.ichthus.info/Disciples/intro.html.
quoted from https://archive.org/details/trh-77_202111 pg. 30-31
For most actual Christians, Good Friday is meant to be a day of prayer, reflection, sorrow for sin, wonder, and holiness. If you are a non believer then you are not going to be inside the mysteries for any real insight about what went on at the time or what ought to be going on in your own life. If you are a believer but spend your lives concerned with disputes raised by non believers over who was to blame for the death of Christ, or who think you have first to understand everything as the acadummies from acadummia would have you do, rather than just taking the plunge and getting wet beyond any real understanding then you can begin to contemplate the mysteries.
Both the Jewish and Roman establishment moguls and minions were not receptive to the teachings, and demonstrations of Jesus as to his nature and the realm of the true God. The Jewish Sanhedrin chose to use him as an expiation to the Romans to show their feigned loyalty to Caesar by demanding his execution by crucifixion. He had a growing following operating apart from their authority and control, which in itself was a threat to their authority. He also antagonized them by exposing their hypocrisy and being blind guides. Despite any compatibility between their scared scripture and his teachings, they simply could not stomach him, as he claimed to be their Messiah and the Son of God, revealing a ruler and realm which was the anthesis of the earthly pursuit of wealth, power, status, and pleasure, and a mission to forgive and redeem sinners. It was also a time when the Jewish Zealots were numerous and very keen on overthrowing the Romans through armed insurrection. Placating the ruthless Romans out of fear of being annihilated should such an upstart movements get out of hand, it was the chief priest, Chiapas, who pronounced the ultimate justification in the Sanhedrin plot to murder Jesus, in saying, ” It is better that one man die for the people than for the whole nation perish.”. Although the motives were entirely different, this statement, nevertheless, did mirror the very plan of God for mankind which Jesus knew he was sent to fulfill. He did not just pick from scripture the easy and pleasant parts of glory and happiness that suited him, like we tend to do. He accepted and lived the whole shebang, and even made it happen, because without His intervention we simply were too weak and powerless to rise out of primordial slime we had made for ourselves in turning away from Him.
Now, if you think that the Jewish establishment was a vicious lot at the time, their evils paled in comparison to the pragmatism, ruthlessness, and cruelty of the Romans, of which our history books chalk our minds with noble admiration and which creatures such as Edward Gibbon blame Christianity for their downfall.
Crucifixion was the most cruel of agonizing deaths the Romans could devise. Unless you were a Roman citizen, and one of the “honestiores”, it was the penalty for most crimes meted out in typical Roman pragmatic fashion to terrorize entire populations into unswerving compliance to the ruling elites. For any insurrection, disobedience, or crime in any conquered jurisdiction, hundreds of innocent people could be seized and crucified. The victims would usually die the most agonizing of deaths which lasted usually about three days. They would affix the victims in open places for the public to view and hear crying out, often from being further tortured in the process. Jesus would have seen many such spectacles in his travels. At the time of Jesus, it was the custom to soften up and flagellate the victims before affixing them to the cross beams and poles. In the flagellations expert torturers would bring their victims almost to the point of death in the pain and shock, let them revive and then beat them again and again back and forth to the point of death.
It was mainly because of this stark incompatibility between Roman pragmatism and the example of Jesus in his own crucifixion that in the rise of Christianity in the following centuries that Roman cruelty was curbed. Constantine, who was the first Roman Christian emperor, outlawed the practice and also banned the slaughter of criminals and political outcasts in the arenas.
i dont want to read the bible
but i would like to kick carl jones in the boillox for all his natzi nonsence
@ Simon…
You are on the money with your synopsis..and in good company..of course the biggest give away other than the church’s own very dark and dubious history is the political nature of it all..and any man with any sense knows that politics are the methods by which rich men profit in this realm..Of course the Obscene wealth generated by churches that supposedly venerate a Yogi Adept who offered a Way through materialism will be lost on most imbeciles..
they would probably ignorantly quote ‘scripture’ at you as if they actually understood any of it…like some trained parrot..or have you burned at the stake..or your eyes put out..or drown your wife in ducking chair…
“One of the most egregious betrayals in the film is when Christ, from the Cross, is shown asking for forgiveness for his Judaic tormentors, “because they know not what they do.” But this forgiveness can only pertain to the Romans, since only they were ignorant of the spiritual contests of the Jews.”
Gorefest Of The Defeated Jesus
By Michael A. Hoffman II
It was mainly because of this stark incompatibility between Roman pragmatism and the example of Jesus in his own crucifixion that in the rise of Christianity in the following centuries that Roman cruelty was curbed. Constantine, who was the first Roman Christian emperor, outlawed the practice and also banned the slaughter of criminals and political outcasts in the arenas.
For some Christians what the Last Supper is really about, is not any “understanding” of “transubstantiation” based on materialistic Aristotelian theories regarding substance and reality, but rather the presentation of a much greater mystery which we simply must believe “into”. Not even Jesus could do more than to speak in parables about the great mysteries, but whatever he said in the way of signification he also effected by his actions, and he provided a basis for the faith through his sacrifices and his miracles.
His Last Supper was the first real supper of awareness at the table set by God for mankind since the dawn of time. It was not by the promises and covenants of the past that we could be redeemed to reach the heavens and the presence of God, or that his kingdom could redeem the world. He had to be here, present in person, not just to “show” us the way, but each of us need Him in our hearts for our own redemption. He took a loaf of bread, which for the Passover meal was likely bread without yeast (the hot air which corresponds to our crooked natures, and why our efforts to reach heaven always end in blastoffs in arcs which bring us down to earth with a thump). He broke the bread into fragments and gave to his disciples, in that reserved upper room for the occasion, saying, “Take this all of you and eat it, for this is my body.” Of course, although Jesus knew he was about to be crucified, his disciples had no idea what he was talking about. After eating, at a meal in which they also would have had wine to drink, he took a cup and held it up for them to see and said, “Take this, all of you, and drink from it, for this is my Blood, which will be shed for you for the forgiveness of sins.. Do this as a remembrance of me.”( meaning do this with such bread and the wine and re-live the practice in the future with him in mind and what he said and was going to do).
Now, right away, any common-sense person who was a follower of Jesus after the crucifixion would have a great deal to ponder over regarding the mysterious command at the Last Supper – not to speak of the Resurrection no doubt witnessed not just in our funky and fallen realm but by those who were very close to him at the time. There is a “real presence” here much greater than any of our logical or philosophical notions can muster, which simply demands the surrender of faith.
If you were paying attention to this site and other independent sites over the past 4 or 5 years, you would see that the world is in a very sorry mess. Christians, in the very least, should not say that we are “evolving” into anything better, but rather that as we time we turn more and more away from God in our riches, pleasures, variety, and in the pride of our technological advancements, we are in fact devolving into worse monsters than in the past by committing even greater evils and errors by our sin and ignorance of God, and likely to our own destruction through mostly very subtle moral and physical toxins in our midst.
To reach us God has had to come into the world and for each of us right into our lives. There was only one way to do this if creatures he made endowed with volition were to be able to endure his presence and love in his realm. We are “legion”. It is us who are separated from the realm of God and from one another. Also, most of us are fragmented by our own wrongs and violations from what w know to be good. The main mystery of God relative to our standing is the mystery of love. We seem not to share in it without suffering which dives us apart. When a loved one suffers or is taken from us, it is very hard to bear, unless there it is wrapped up in the mystery of love and our participation in it. To reach into our sordid and selfish little hearts and souls, He has to not only come here, but he has to let us in our wickedness tear apart his human frame of perfection into pieces so that he can be internalized for our redemption in the clothing of his person, and then he seals that promise with the blood of his own suffering, with his divine blood to flow through us.
Indeed, this meal, this death the only real Passover where all of the earlier ones were in fact only symbols or signs of what is necessary for each person to believe and to be redeemed. What would it profit any of us to have all the knowledge of the universe, and have the wealth of nations, and be detached from the Love of God? What gain to live forever and be without God? Such an existence would likely be hell – the very way we are going.
Excellent point Brian made about narcissists losing their minds when their ‘reality’ is not validated by others.
God birthed Himself as His Son, Jesus the Christ. Only daring faith in that kind of unscientific phenomenon, including His confrontational ministry- execution-burial & resurrection, can rid the individual of his narcissism & hypocrisy- no matter how low on the spectrum of these traits he may fancy himself to be -by confessing his failures & inviting Christ to be birthed in his heart to grow in full stature as a son & friend of God.
@ David…
Yes..well most of that is very hard to verify if not impossible, due to it being doubtful if any of these people actually existed .. Half the books of the new testament contradict the others, particularly when dealing with the Crucifixion itself…. and that’s because it’s a political construct… the Early Christians didn’t actually believe in the divinity of Christ nor the Resurrection.. which were a later addition.. which also implies that those ‘bits’ hadn’t actually been written yet…and which is why ‘heretics’ had to be disposed of..
Of course what is verifiable would be what the so called Christians did to to Hypatia and thousands of other Gnostics/Pagani and the libraries and seats of learning in late Antiquity..which you must admit wasn’t very Christian of them..
MM, Francesca Albanese is “investigating arms sales from both countries to see if they are used to enforce Israel’s genocide and to determine their complicity?” She could just ask her husband Massimiliano Calì, a World Bank official since 2012. Money changers surely know where coin is flowing freely through sacrifice.