John and Nisha Whitehead – The Rutherford Institute Jan 17, 2023
“No president from either party should have the sole power to shut down or take control of the internet or any other of our communication channels during an emergency.”—Senator Rand Paul
What’s to stop the U.S. government from throwing the kill switch and shutting down phone and internet communications in a time of so-called crisis?
After all, it’s happening all over the world.
Communications kill switches have become tyrannical tools of domination and oppression to stifle political dissent, shut down resistance, forestall election losses, reinforce military coups, and keep the populace isolated, disconnected and in the dark, literally and figuratively.
As the Guardian reports, “From Ukraine to Myanmar, government-run internet outages are picking up pace around the world. In 2021, there were 182 shutdowns in 34 countries… Countries across Africa and Asia have turned to shutdowns in a bid to control behaviour, while India, largely in the conflict-ridden region of Jammu and Kashmir, plunged into digital darkness more times than any other last year… Civil unrest in Ethiopia and Kazakhstan has triggered internet shutdowns as governments try to prevent political mobilisation and stop news about military suppression from emerging.”
In an internet-connected age, killing the internet is tantamount to bringing everything—communications, commerce, travel, the power grid—to a standstill.
Tyrants and would-be tyrants rely on this “cloak of darkness” to advance their agendas.
In Myanmar, for example, the internet shutdown came on the day a newly elected government was to have been sworn in. That’s when the military staged a digital coup and seized power. Under cover of a communications blackout that cut off the populace from the outside world and each other, the junta “carried out nightly raids, smashing down doors to drag out high-profile politicians, activists and celebrities.”
These government-imposed communications shutdowns serve to not only isolate, terrorize and control the populace, but also underscore the citizenry’s lack of freedom in the face of the government’s limitless power.
Yet as University of California Irvine law professor David Kaye explains, these kill switches are no longer exclusive to despotic regimes. They have “migrated into a toolbox for governments that actually do have the rule of law.”
This is what digital authoritarianism looks like in a technological age.
Digital authoritarianism, as the Center for Strategic and International Studies cautions, involves the use of information technology to surveil, repress, and manipulate the populace, endangering human rights and civil liberties, and co-opting and corrupting the foundational principles of democratic and open societies, “including freedom of movement, the right to speak freely and express political dissent, and the right to personal privacy, online and off.”
For those who insist that it can’t happen here, it can and it has.
In 2005, cell service was disabled in four major New York tunnels, reportedly to avert potential bomb detonations via cell phone.
In 2009, those attending President Obama’s inauguration had their cell signals blocked—again, same rationale.
And in 2011, San Francisco commuters had their cell phone signals shut down, this time, to thwart any possible protests over a police shooting of a homeless man.
With shutdowns becoming harder to detect, who’s to say it’s not still happening?
Although an internet kill switch is broadly understood to be a complete internet shutdown, it can also include a broad range of restrictions such as content blocking, throttling, filtering, complete shutdowns, and cable cutting.
As Global Risk Intel explains:
“Content blocking is a relatively moderate method that blocks access to a list of selected websites or applications. When users access these sites and apps, they receive notifications that the server could not be found or that access was denied by the network administrator. A more subtle method is throttling. Authorities decrease the bandwidth to slow down the speed at which specific websites can be accessed. A slow internet connection discourages users to connect to certain websites and does not arouse immediate suspicion. Users may assume that connection service is slow but may not conclude that this circumstance was authorized by the government. Filtering is another tool to censor targeted content and erases specific messages and terms that the government does not approve of.”
How often do most people, experiencing server errors and slow internet speeds, chalk it up to poor service? Who would suspect the government of being behind server errors and slow internet speeds?
Then again, this is the same government that has subjected us to all manner of encroachments on our freedoms (lockdowns, mandates, restrictions, contact tracing programs, heightened surveillance, censorship, overcriminalization, shadow banning, etc.) in order to fight the COVID-19 pandemic, preserve the integrity of elections, and combat disinformation.
These tactics have become the tools of domination and oppression in an internet-dependent age.
It really doesn’t matter what the justifications are for such lockdowns. No matter the rationale, the end result is the same: an expansion of government power in direct proportion to the government’s oppression of the citizenry.
According to Global Risk Intel, there are many motives behind such restrictions:
“For instance, the kill switch serves to censor content and constrain the spread of news. This particularly concerns news reports that cover police brutality, human rights abuses, or educational information. Governments may also utilize the kill switch to prevent government-critical protestors from communicating through message applications like WhatsApp, Facebook, or Twitter and organizing mass demonstrations. Therefore, internet restrictions can provide a way of regulating the flow of information and hindering dissent. Governments reason that internet limitations help stop the spread of fake news and strengthen national security and public safety in times of unrest.”
In this age of manufactured crises, emergency powers and technofascism, the government already has the know-how, the technology and the authority.
Now all it needs is the “right” crisis to flip the kill switch.
This particular kill switch can be traced back to the Communications Act of 1934. Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Act empowers the president to suspend wireless radio and phone services “if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense” during a time of “war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States.”
In the event of a national crisis, the president has a veritable arsenal of emergency powers that override the Constitution and can be activated at a moment’s notice. These range from imposing martial law and suspending habeas corpus to shutting down all forms of communications, restricting travel and implementing a communications kill switch.
That national emergency can take any form, can be manipulated for any purpose and can be used to justify any end goal—all on the say so of the president.
The seeds of this ongoing madness were sown several decades ago when George W. Bush stealthily issued two presidential directives that granted the president the power to unilaterally declare a national emergency, which is loosely defined as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions.“
Comprising the country’s Continuity of Government (COG) plan, these directives (National Security Presidential Directive 51 and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20), which do not need congressional approval, provide a skeletal outline of the actions the president will take in the event of a “national emergency.”
Just what sort of actions the president will take once he declares a national emergency can barely be discerned from the barebones directives. However, one thing is clear: in the event of a perceived national emergency, the COG directives give unchecked executive, legislative and judicial power to the president.
The country would then be subjected to martial law by default, and the Constitution and the Bill of Rights would be suspended.
The internet kill switch is just one piece of the government’s blueprint for locking down the nation and instituting martial law.
There may be many more secret powers that presidents may institute in times of so-called crisis without oversight from Congress, the courts, or the public. These powers do not expire at the end of a president’s term. They remain on the books, just waiting to be used or abused by the next political demagogue.
Given the government’s penchant for weaponizing one national crisis after another in order to expand its powers and justify all manner of government tyranny in the so-called name of national security, it’s only a matter of time before this particular emergency power to shut down the internet is activated.
Then again, an all-out communications blackout is just a more extreme version of the technocensorship that we’ve already been experiencing at the hands of the government and its corporate allies.
Packaged as an effort to control the spread of speculative or false information in the name of national security, restricting access to social media has become a popular means of internet censorship.
In fact, these tactics are at the heart of several critical cases before the U.S. Supreme Court over who gets to control, regulate or remove what content is shared on the internet: the individual, corporate censors or the police state.
Nothing good can come from techno-censorship.
As Glenn Greenwald writes for The Intercept:
“The glaring fallacy that always lies at the heart of pro-censorship sentiments is the gullible, delusional belief that censorship powers will be deployed only to suppress views one dislikes, but never one’s own views… Facebook is not some benevolent, kind, compassionate parent or a subversive, radical actor who is going to police our discourse in order to protect the weak and marginalized or serve as a noble check on mischief by the powerful. They are almost always going to do exactly the opposite: protect the powerful from those who seek to undermine elite institutions and reject their orthodoxies. Tech giants, like all corporations, are required by law to have one overriding objective: maximizing shareholder value. They are always going to use their power to appease those they perceive wield the greatest political and economic power.“
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, these censors are laying the groundwork to preempt any “dangerous” ideas that might challenge the power elite’s stranglehold over our lives.
Whatever powers you allow the government and its corporate operatives to claim now, whatever the reason might be, will at some point in the future be abused and used against you by tyrants of your own making.
By the time you add AI technologies, social credit systems, and wall-to-wall surveillance into the mix, you don’t even have to be a critic of the government to get snared in the web of digital censorship.
Eventually, as George Orwell predicted, telling the truth will become a revolutionary act.
drug companies being sued over the jew jab deaths
whistleblower speaks
whistleblower speaks
https://apnews.com/article/ufos-uaps-congress-whistleblower-spy-aliens-ba8a8cfba353d7b9de29c3d906a69ba7
news today
LESBIAN NEWS
A couple of Lesbians who wanted a baby but would not sleep with a man to sleep with a man’
( this is nota joke )
Story by Tom Campbell •
A couple of lesbians wanted a baby to start a family have said they were asked by a GP why they did not find a man to sleep with to get pregnant she said the NHS is hard pressed for every penny and it would be wasting many thousands of pounds for IVF, j
just sleep with a man.
Elissa Hillier, 32, and her present partner Kaylee, 35, from Manchester, said they were also asked during the consultation whether they knew that to have a baby they needed “human sperm”.The couple had booked an appointment with a GP at the Orient Road Medical Practice in Salford to discuss their options in February 2023.
But they said the GP did not know how to proceed with other sexualities and that his advice left them feeling “confused”
The lesbians who then decided to go private, have since found a clinic in Denmark and one in the UK, where they have done three rounds of fertility treatment which failed.They are currently doing IVF and, having spent in total around £15,000 ton treatments, have launche to cover their costs and help them start a family.
they thought the NHS should pay for this
The pair are also launching a podcast about their fertility journey called NoMoreMen.
“We went in really excited thinking this was the start of our journey and that we were going to be having a baby,” said Elissa who admits to being a man hater and is currently studying English and creative writing at the University of Bolton and works part-time as a careers advisor and in retail.
“When we left, we just sat in the car in silence and were like ‘Did that actually just happen?
we were fobbed off because we were perverts ?
we have paid into the NHS but cannot get help, if we were migrants or black it would be there for us
“The GP just stared at us for a bit and was like ‘Why don’t you just go out and find a man to sleep with?’” added Elissa.
The GP reluctantly offered to put them on a “three year” waiting list for a fertility appointment with the NHS.
He said costs to the tax payer would possible be £35.000 upwards
ISRAELS NEW PEACE PLAN
Israeli foreign minister Israel Katz raised eyebrows by showing European Union counterparts a video promoting building an artificial island
just off Gaza at talks about how to bring peace to the region on Monday …
“‘The Israeli minister presented his plans for a large artificial island off the coast of Gaza …
we could put the palestinianas syrians and iraqis refused by the UK and ireland there’,
The EU’s high representative for foreign affairs Josep Borrell told reporters …
“Mr Katz previously promoted the idea in his former role as transport minister in 2017 … advocating that the international community
pay for an artificial island patrolled by Israel that would allow some supplies, energy, and water to reach them by a bridge.
The Middle East must have peace and only by expelling all these people can this be achieved
after all God promised the land to the jews
“One official described the video as … ‘very very bizarre’ …”
what an excellent idea…close down the internet…if only it were that easy to deprive the sedants of their nonsense and pornography…it’s only a pity that this isn’t the only way to consume hehe..’sports’…
Anyone that knows anything about networks..knows of course that they can never be closed… which then defaults to the need for the hollow men to make you think that they can… which of course they are investing a lot of energy into making you believe…and no doubt to steer you all into the little corner that they have curated for imbeciles of the terminal sort….
Of course one has to ask oneself what is it that these miscreants are actually ‘shutting down’,,. when one already has an infrastructure and the toys to play…
MIGRANT ACID ATTACKS IN THE UK
Rankin shoots powerful photos for global campaign to end acid violence
Story by Niall Hampton • 20h
Top fashion and portrait photographer Rankin has helped produce a ’look book’ which aims to raise awareness of acid attacks – and to help prevent them taking place.
A new campaign from Acid Survivors Trust International (ASTi), the Tear Couture Look Book employs a format used in the fashion industry to showcase the latest styles and fabrics to tell the story of acid attack survivor Patricia Lefranc.
The look book aims to highlight the devastating effects of acid attacks, which are more prevalent in regions where fashion and textile industries are based – due to sulphuric acid being required in large quantities.
Photos of Lefranc modelling for Rankin illustrate the book, which also includes a foreword by ASTi patron HRH The Princess Royal.
Acid attack survivor Patricia Lefranc, holding a photo of her taken before she was attacked, photographed by Rankin for the Tear Couture Look Book campaign (Image credit: © Rankin / McCann Health London)
Since migrants have been people trafficked into the UK by government acid attacks have skyrocketed to the point no one can buy acid or corrosive materials now in the UK
Acid attack survivor Patricia Lefranc, holding a photo of her taken before she was attacked, photographed by Rankin for the Tear Couture Look Book campaign (Image credit: © Rankin / McCann Health London)
© Provided by Digital Camera World
Noting his long-term affinity with the fashion industry, Rankin says: “I have been delighted to see the changes that have taken place within the industry in recent years to make it more sustainable and responsible.
“When ASTi explained to me the issue of acid misuse within supply chains, I knew I had to take action.”
Rankin photographing acid attack survivor Patricia Lefranc in his north London studio, for the Tear Couture Look Book campaign (Image credit: © McCann Health London)
“Many people are unaware of the enormous pain and suffering that acid attack survivors go through,“ she said.
“I’m so grateful to Rankin for this opportunity to raise awareness of our situation, and to take steps together to prevent further attacks.”
Jaf Shah, Executive Director of ASTi, said: “Government has a key role to play in stopping incidences of racist acid attacks on women
“We’re so grateful to all those helping to bring this issue into the spotlight: HRH Princess Anne for writing the foreword to the Look Book and, of course, Patricia and Rankin
ASTi is a charity based in the UK, but works in the UK and across the world. It is campaigning for an end to the easy access to corrosive substances that are weaponised – most often agains
Most people who care know how and why, the God damn “governments” Stifle Political Dissent.
Analysts, pundits, experts, “influencers”, etc., who haven’t yet come to understand the dire necessity of locking up these miscreants who are telling everybody what to do and what to believe are of no interest to me.
TPTBD (The The Powers That Be Damned) are arch criminals who belong in jail awaiting sentences from the Honorable Minister of Justice and Punishment, Sir Umbra Bellator!
If you can’t see that, sit down and shut the f*ck up!
I’ve been enduring these milk-toast apologists for way too long!
Since September 12 2001 to be precise!!!
They can GO….F*CK…..THEMSELVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Voltman
🐐RageCast 415: WEAKNESS KILLS – Raging Dissident + How Israel Sensors Your Internet – Komorusan714 + Davos 2024, Financial Reckoning, Lab Leak Propaganda, DEI Insanity – EyesIsWatchin + Logos Revealed – Russ Winter & Giuseppe
https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2024/01/live-ragecast-415-weakness-kills-raging.html
DENNIS HEALEY
Denis Healey, Baron Healey, was a British Labour Party politician who served as Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1974 to 1979
and as Secretary of State for Defence from 1964 to 1970; he remains the longest-serving Defence Secretary to date.
Dennis used to walk his 2 Labrador dogs morning and night, Dennis loved those dogs
he would not eat his dinner before those dogs had been fed
His job as secretary of defence meant his close sighting of a UFO saw him come into MI5 HQ
and demanded an explanation.
We did not hear what he was told but Dennis went very pale
Dennis was Deputy Leader of the Labour Party from 1980 to 1983. so a very important man
Dennis like Lord Geore Brown was an MI 5 informant on Soviet and israeli penetration of the country and intell services
at that time 13 members of the labour party were known to be consorting with foriegn intell
Son after a couple of pub drunks claimed they had traveled the world making crop circles with a plank and bit of string
this was given a lot of publicity, before being debunked and laughed at
Up to his death in 1998 Dennis Healey stuck to his story
On August 9 it was Peter wrights birthday, Peter wrote the book ” spycatcher ”
So Dennis and I took him to the Crown and Mitre to buy him a pint
Dennis said while drawing his curtains for the night, he saw the UFO again
he said he felt they wanted to contact him while out walking but were afraid of his dogs
Excellent. For only chaos (economic-societal/electric grid-cyber collapse/CME-asteroid-cataclysm) can create the lawless conditions necessary for a prowhite fascist force to materialize & overthrow/supplant the Zionist-Communist-Christian State & liquidate the masses of scum. Only anarchy can topple tyranny. And then once ZOG is annihilated the cult of Aryan Adepts of the A.A. will seize power & establish a new politico-religious Order.
“93 [Thelema] as base for Nazi New Order.” –Aleister Crowley 1936
Disciples of the Watch–the future is ours.
Eagle pass will become a bursting disk. If it bursts in a few months, then there could be a flood of migrants into the US. All hungry people and in need for housing. That would be a great moment to use these kill switches.
all i need is my beer, porno and simian sports to watch and i’ll be fine
Centralised authority appears to me to have always been in arms race with the general population in terms of controlling whatever the current medium is.
The printing press, once a vehicle for dissent gradually, become subsumed by bought out publishers. Included in this are the newspapers that were bought at the beginning of the last century to prohibit criticism of International Jews and the central banking system for example.
The dawn of the internet saw the opening of a new frontier that might be looked back on as a “golden age” by us, but the “wild west” by TPTB.
New media is born of the creative drive that is probably at odds with the urge to control. TPTB thus forever incentivise the light side of the “force” to develop newer forms of communication.
Any government person these days reading this article would have to disagree with virtually everything said. The reason is that once you join any government service you are enthralled to the government, and your are really in the business of “controlling” people with or without their consent, and no longer are you really “serving” them. The last thing the government you work for can tolerate is a freedom of people to expose their evils and mount an opposition to the misuse of their authority.
To say that our nations in the West are “rule of law” jurisdictions is like saying that the courts are “independent”, or that certain special interests do not rule our governments which also govern our courts. Using those terms in reference to our governments and our courts has become a joke these days. We tend to throw around various words in our speech and arguments which we understand in one way but those in power give the words entirely different meanings. To the state the term ‘rule of law’ means their right to rule us by any laws they deem fit to impose on us, and to the courts the term ‘independence’ clearly means “independence” from any real duty of impartiality when it comes to disputes with the sate or the power elites running our governments.
Although few in power appear to be bound by the rule of law, at least in the West many of us still believe they ought to be bound by the same laws which govern us, which is not the case in any more backward or feudal nation, which is the direction the power elites of the West are trying take the entire world – so that they can “control” virtually everything. Most of us who are not completely intimidated by the state still believe we have a right to expose the wrongs and crimes of those in power who in their elitism appear to have no moral limits, and we also believe in the right to assemble, and mount oppositions to them in order change our governments. The state and courts clearly do not share our views.
Such rights and freedoms do indeed interfere with the wills and interests of any top down order making it more difficult for them to govern us, and i should be no mystery that they have deliberately sowed moral and ideological division among us mainly in order to divide, conquer and control us, in ways that no effective opposition can be mounted to oppose them. In a number of ways they have been supressing our basic rights and freedoms such that they cannot to be a check to any of their major abuses, and in putting themselves above the laws and rights which built the West, they honestly believe that with total impunity they can lie to us about anything, mount massive deceptions and psyops, brainwash us, withholding crucial information from us which would allow responsible free choices on existential issues, suppress free speech, and and even murder us with bioweapons and toxic jabs, all of which we witnessed all throughout the Covid plandemic.
As for our “rights” to turn to the courts for redress in order to protect our most basic rights and freedoms which were summarily cancelled, including the right to life, our governments, the courts, and the power elites behind them again were in absolute control. As witnessed all though the plandemic, our courts are anything but “independent” from our governments which are completely subservient to that mysterious monolithic, lockstep top-down order running things – either the international banking cartel or the illuminati Masons, or both.
Our courts showed their true colors and failed us entirely and they continue to do so, as did our precious Charters or Bills of Rights and Constitutional guarantees, and all other major institutions, including our churches, under the hideous power of that same top-down order of sycophants and sociopaths. We now await for the next manufactured crisis to act as a pretext for fresh “emergency conditions” in order to further enthrall us in their New World Order technocratic visions and plans.
Greed and the lust for hegemonic power over everything by the top-down “few” is the only rationale for the insanity of things like:
– the war and land clearances in the Ukraine,
– the ethnic cleansing and land clearances in Gaza,
– the globalist crimes to move farmers off their lands for their agri-corp monopolies
(Gates, Blackrock, etc.),
– the highly criminal and toxic Covid vax oppression still being carried out by most of our
governments,
– the threat of a WWIII, and
– the very orchestrated monetary inflation being used to destroy value and promote
“degrowth” such that by 2030 indeed we will in fact “own” nothing.
Notice how words such as ‘sustainability’ and ‘ownership’ are so loosely defined and bandied about in the UN Agenda documents and by the elites heading up our governments and the imperious WEF which thrives on mass deceptions such as the global warming fraud and the Covid plandemic. Every alleged sustainability crisis they have relied upon has either been deliberately created or grossly exaggerated, and where real to some extent as with world poverty, such problems are being resolved with the free flow of knowledge and development and the existing conventions between our nations.
Wiki – “The Rutherford Institute was named after Samuel Rutherford, a 17th-century theologian who wrote a book, Lex, Rex, which challenged the concept of the divine right of kings.[12] When The Rutherford Institute was founded, conservative Protestants[who?] in the United States were reconsidering their role in American political and legal life, perceiving that the federal government was intent on encroaching on Americans’ religious liberties.[citation needed] Organizations such as The Rutherford Institute pursued matters of religious liberties in the courts, and The Rutherford Institute became the model for groups such as the National Legal Foundation, the Liberty Counsel, and the American Center for Law and Justice.”
It is also interesting to note that Brit Royalty together with the imperious population-culling Brit aristocracy has been a major supporter of the WEF (World Economic Forum) and the UN Agendas. No doubt they all tend to believe in some kind of “divine” or mysterious right to lie, cheat, steal, murder and oppress the masses and that they are exempt from the laws of the land and of the true God. To them we are unwashed commoners who have no such privileges. They most certainly do not believe in the same God most Christians believe in, and most likely they share the same bed with the mainly Zio-run international banking cartel backing all of the insane evils mentioned above and being used to push their “new” world order, which comes down to agendas for “global-feudalism”. Meanwhile they concentrate and consolidate through the misuse of their wealth, power, and armies more and more of the assets of the globe into their control.
Not that it really matters, but Freddy Biggs is not from the same person or source as Fred B. Freddy should be careful as he may be cutting down on his readership on this site with those who judge everything on an ad hominin basis.
I don’t know the name of your Messiah, but the name of mine is Damien Thorn.
NO INTERNET; NO MONEY MACHINE
ABSOLUTE CHAOS; WONDERFUL !
sorry they will not do .
Lately I have had trouble getting into the articles at Renegade Tribune. Reading first article works fine but next gives me error messages. Same thing next day. Anyone else encountering this problem over there?
every week i go to the city ground to watch and cheer on my millionaire simians, greaseballs and mulattoes play football.
morningstar
who gives a sh*t. Any site that bans nico x is sh*t.
Don’t think for a second that the Jews entrenched within our govt won’t establish the equivalent of the “CHEKA” used during the RED TERROR 1918, and that some of these people will be illegal immigrants. When these subhuman slime are told to murder us, they will have no compunction about doing so because they know nothing of our history or our culture, and so cutting us to ribbons with AK47s or machetes will not be an issue.
Clean your guns, buy more ammo. The idea is to take out as many of these animals as possible on your way to hell.
Judaism: A religion of hate
https://evolutionofconsciousness.health.blog/
prof susan foster
your message about lesbians
in africa we deal with lesbians differently
in our village a big lesbian lady has enticed in and abused 2 teenage girls
so in the middle of the night 6 men crept into her home
and gang raped her
no one heard the screams
she was seen sobbing in the morning but she never reoffended again
Morningstar – Yes. Same issue.
Beckett
Nico told me that along with Renegade, the Unz news site has blocked him too–allowing him only one or two comments a day. They’re jealous and afraid of his influence and ministry taking over the white movement and the world.
93
What difference does it make? What do you think knowing the truth about anything will do? What good has it ever done you? All it does is make you angry. Those 17th century peasants that knew nothing about anything beyond the next hill had it WAY better than you do. They could even get firewood to heat their boxes and water from a stream. I see ZERO value in the internet.
You all say it’s so great — yet its used exclusively to control every aspect of your life — and then you wet your pants at the thought of it being shut down.
By the way: the way the internet works makes it have an inherent “kill switch” in every country from the day it’s set up. The backbone in your country will have just a handful of servers — all owned and controlled by your government. Pull the power on those servers and you’re cut off from the rest of the world.
Tina–
Yet the Christians, Commies, wogs and other assorted nutjobs are allowed dozens a posts a day on there. Naturally because they all represent idiocy, lunacy and degeneration.
I’m honored to get a mention from the inimitable Voltman! Any links posted by Voltman are definitely worth the click.
“University of California Irvine law professor David Kaye explains, these kill switches are no longer exclusive to despotic regimes. They have ‘migrated into a toolbox for governments that actually do have the rule of law’.” … Ummmm, “government that actually do have the rule of law”, eh?? And which governments would they be, precisely? The large majority of national and state “governments” are nothing but criminal cartels at this point and couldn’t give a rat’s ass about the “rule of law”. They are ALL “despotic regimes” at this point, David Kaye, you dumb-f*ck. Or I suppose Kaye has selective amnesia about the covid-1984 war upon humanity by “governments” large and small.