HenryMakow.com – Dec 22, 2023
(The Shakespeare Monument erected in 1740. The crossed legs have a Rosicrucian significance. Shakespeare is pointing to the word Temples. A Masonic Temple is a room where a Masonic Lodge meets.)
The West has been saturated in Satanism without even knowing it.
Shakespeare was the founder (or pen name) for a school of Masons writing under his name, and such manuscripts, etc, were left to the custody of a succession of hands from the Elizabethan era onwards’.
by David Richards – (henrymakow.com)
A little-known book written by a high-ranking Freemason exposes the truth about Shakespeare. Shakespeare: The Creator of Freemasonry (1933) by Alfred Dodd argues that Shakespeare was a Freemason who encoded his plays with Masonic messaging. The work provides exhaustive and irrefutable evidence to support this view.
A mystery veils the life of William Shakespeare. The completed facts of his life could be written on a small sheet of notepaper, so little is known of him. Dodd states this is ‘due to the fact that William Shakespeare was a Freemason, the centre of a ring of Rosicrosse-Masons’.
At present there is not a single manuscript of the plays of Shakespeare to be found anywhere. There is not a single vestige of his handwriting in connection with literature. For Dodd, the complete disappearance of everything is too complete to be natural. ‘The inference can be drawn that the Grand Possessors were nothing less than the literary school of Rosicrosse-Masons of which Shakespeare was the founder (or pen name) and that such manuscripts, etc, were left to the custody of a succession of hands from the Elizabethan era onwards’.
To be or not to be, that is the question…To live or to die, what is the answer?
More Makow bollox
look 5 years back a group of acedemics at cambridge uni after having run the bible through a bank of computers
they thendid the works of shakespeare, after the bank of computers had bee running some time the answer came back
” yes shakespeare wrote every thing attributed to him not lord whatsit not bacon not john temple
but shakespeare
Shakespeare-as-a Freemason makes the latter good and not Shakespeare bad (I wondered if Romeo and Juliet were Rome and Jerusalem, the Star-Crossed lovers)
Aleister Crowley, like Shakespeare, was born in Warwickshire County:
“It has been remarked a strange coincidence that one small county should have given England her two greatest poets–for one must not forget Shakespeare.” –Crowley
The writer Alfred Dodd writes: “that a single individual could have authored so many brilliant and complex plays”. This is partly nonsense; a contemporary of “Shakespeare” Christopher Marlowe also wrote complex plays and would have written more had he not been killed in a barroom brawl. If you need proof that “Shakespeare” of Stratford-on-Avon certainly did not write the plays, a man with a questionable education portfolio and never left England, get a hold of the book, “Shakespeare’s Unorthodox Biography” by Diana Price.
For the best evidence for an Elizabethan aristocrat who had all the credentials to write the plays and travelled Italy extensively, buy the book, “Shakespeare by Another Name”, by investigator Mark Anderson. Actually there are a number of books on this subject, most pointing to the same aristocrat as the Shakespeare author. I will not be the spoiler naming the man, you should buy the book.
At eighteen I had a 35 year-old girlfriend/professor. She was the first to tell me that Shakespeare’s sonnets were written to and about young men. What could be more obvious in sonnet 1 or 18? Shakespeare laments a young man becoming so enamored of his own beauty that he fails to pass it on. Sonnet 52, which the article quotes, is about the anticipation of meeting in secret with a young man who disrobes and submits, but only on occasion. The treasure revealed is his naked body. Shake a spear in love, read the sonnets and try to come to a different conclusion; good luck with that:
…Can bring him to his sweet up-lockèd treasure,
The which he will not every hour survey,
For blunting the fine point of seldom pleasure.
Therefore are feasts so solemn and so rare,
Since seldom coming in the long year set,
Since, seldom coming, is the long year set…
We don’t know for certain who authored the sonnets but there is no doubt about the fact he was boy crazy. This irritated some women who thought it was about them. So they claimed that Bach’s Chaconne was written about his late wife but that turned out not to be the case. Bach made it clear that his compositions were acts of devotion to Christ. Another woman told me Chinese emperors had male concubines and the elite regarded woman as unclean but necessary for producing young men.
After reading many theories about who wrote the sonnets and plays, the gist of it appears they were written by one man who was ‘gay’, Catholic and in fear for his life. References to the Gunpowder Plot in Macbeth could not be written by an author who was dead, but another claims the plans to blow up parliament were know years in advance. Catholics were being hunted. The Earl of Salisbury is just one example of officials that hated Catholics enough to want them all dead. Catholic monasteries and churches were being looted under the guise of reformation. It was mass theft, the ancient Catholic aristocracy was dissolving and a Jewish/Protestant alliance forming against them. Great fortunes were made robbing, murdering Catholics, stealing their land. Longshanks expelled the Jews in 1290 but most went north and hid, biding their time breeding with the English, producing a fifth column of cryptos. Cryptos seeking revenge to the seventh generation. Isaac Newton, was a Freemason tool of Jewish bankers who hated Catholics. He was made Warden of the Mint, he was also a plagiarist.
Claims that Shakespeare was a committee is most likely a ‘Miles Mathis’ type psyop to rewrite history and blot out the memory of Catholic cultural figures like Hitler, Beethoven, Mozart and Shakespeare all of whom were Catholic but ‘Miles Mathis’ claims were Jews. Beethoven was as German as one can get and on top of that if you read his letters: Beethoven Couldn’t Stand Them. ‘MM (33) claims that Mozart and Shakespeare were Jews but he also claims they were committees. When Mozart was poisoned and Shakespeare died, their genius died with them. One of Mozart’s sons spent years trying to find who killed his father. The poisoning of Mozart and another Catholic, Franz Schubert were heinous crimes. Jewish authors for some reason heaped filth on Schubert’s memory, Theodore Dalrymple (Anthony Daniels) using the composer as a mere “Holocaust” backdrop for “Nazis” listening to Winterreise at night and then carrying on with killing Jewish babies during the day but in the same article presents Gustav Mahler as the greatest song writer ever. That article alone was enough to arouse suspicions that Schubert was murdered and sure enough, the composer himself claimed that he was poisoned just before he died.
As if William ever knew the Queen, much less the Captain of the Queen’s Guard but Eddie de Vere knew them both and a bunch of other folks big and small. You can still read all about it, lol. Used to be quite the fad..
Jews like to rob the white man of his artistic geniuses by claiming they didn’t create these works, but instead some ‘jew-masonic conspiracy’ produced them all.
Absolutely Mosley!
The worthless dogshit kike is always trying to feed off our genius…by fake association…or that a great nation was founded by one of their `lost tribes` (eg Japan currently).
The fact is this criminal cartel have never produced any architecture, literature, history or cultural contribution at all – Fuck All!! The bible is the biggest lying scam ever and needs to be universally rejected for us to move onward & upward. No archaeological evidence for any of it.
We must shed these poisonous parasites forthwith.
get right in their face & kick them out!
@ BOB SMITH
ARSENIC speciality of jews !
I wasn’t going to bother. The controversy surrounding the authorship of the works attributed to William Shakespeare, has featured here at least three times within recent months and is becoming a little jaded. Despite Bob Smith’s valiant efforts, engaging in the debate once again seems overly taxing. It is, after all, a complex subject that cannot be adequately addressed in short form. Nevertheless, I would add a few observations, some of which I’ve touched upon before.
• Alfred Dodd believed that the author of Shakespeare’s corpus was Francis Bacon. It was not his intention to suggest that William of Stratford was the founder of Freemasonry. I own an autographed copy of Dodd’s “The Personal Poems of Francis Bacon – Shakespeare’s Sonnet Diary” from 1939. In his personal hand, he expresses his gratitude to someone called A. Sampson of The Seekers, “in memory of a happy meeting.” The Seekers were a sixteenth century Christian sect who were opposed to both Catholicism and Calvinism and believed that there was no true institutional church. They opposed the sacrament of Baptism, though there is evidence that they emerged from the Baptist Church. The scant historical evidence concerning The Seekers’ mission would have it, that they were eventually absorbed into The Quakers. Yet, they apparently survived until at least the times of Alfred Dodd.
Dodd was a promulgator of the Freemasonic tradition. He was biased in the extreme, seeking to aggrandize Shakespeare for the Lodge’s acclaim.
If any of you have read Francis Bacon, you’ll know that it is inconceivable that Bacon could have written the poetry and plays of Shakespeare. Bacon was a dull and methodical writer. He was interested in natural sciences and wrote for a limited audience of the cognoscenti. He had no sense of humour and was unconcerned with affairs of the heart. As you’d expect of a son of a reigning monarch, he was as cold as the love of gold.
• In Elizabethan/ Jacobean England, a poet was considered to be an artist. A playwright was a mere artisan. Hence “playwright,” comparable to a wheelwright. A poet did not aspire to be a playwright but a playwright might aspire to be a poet. Shakespeare’s Sonnets and longer narrative poems were known to be completed by 1594. They therefore pre-date the first of the plays. Whomever authored the poetry, it is certainly not the writer of the plays. In style and temperament, they are too distinct. My favoured candidate for the authorship of the poems is Henry Wriothelsey, the 3rd Earl of Southampton. In alignment with Bob Smith’s observations, Southampton was a known homosexual, who spent two years in prison for upsetting Elizabeth I, before being pardoned by her successor, James I of England. He likely compiled and added to his works during his imprisonment. Southampton is more usually remembered as the one and only patron of The Chamberlain’s Men theatre troupe and of William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon.
• There’s a case to be made for Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford, as the author of the poems. There is no credible case to be made for de Vere as the author of the plays. The Earl of Oxford was hated by courtiers and servants alike. He was a cruel, brutish and arrogant man. As a teenager, he murdered one of his servants but managed to bribe the jury and was acquited upon his personal testimony that the servant had deliberately run into his sword while it was drawn. He was compassionless, unlike the author of the plays.
• With regard to a collaborative effort of several authors, it is very well known and fully accepted by academia, that William Shakespeare had two collaborators; Thomas Middleton and John Fletcher.It is an undisputed fact.
• Without fully reiterating the arguments I have brought forward before, it is important to note that William of Stratford went to one of the finest schools in England; that his father was the chief bailiff of the town and regularly hosted foreign dignateries on their way to London. William certainly had experience of the Royal Court. His theatre troupe performed for the king and many of his plays debuted before royalty.
William of Stratford is by far the best candidate as author of the plays of William Shakespeare.
The line “I am a BROTHER of your GRACIOUS ORDER late come from the sea”. Is probably a direct reference to the Templars.
Andyay, thanks for that learned spirited defense of William S. I’m darn near there.
the author is irrelevant..the muses were channelled
Burn the Media houses…Fleet st …wherever
these cun*s have gotta go