Kit Knightley – Off-Guardian Dec 14, 2023
In November 29th, the British Parliament’s cross-party Environmental Audit Committee published a new report on “Environmental change and food security”.
The timing of the report is more than interesting, considering the UN’s COP28 summit published its own “Declaration on Sustainable Agriculture, Resilient Food Systems and Climate Action” (which the UK signed) just two days later. But I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
The report claims – amongst many other things – that we…
need to adapt our food and farming system to become more resilient to the effects of climate change and biodiversity loss.
This is actually an inversion of the usual argument. The standard line is that we should change our eating habits to prevent climate change (the report still claims this too), but now we are being told that we must change our eating habits or climate change will cause us to starve to death.
Just like the push to change climate into a public health crisis, inverting this argument is about creating a sense of threat, about scaring people. It’s always about scaring people.
But, you’ll be pleased to know, while the reason we need to change may have altered, what we actually have to do remains the same: Eat less meat. A lot less meat.
The report repeats, countless times, the Climate Change Committee’s recommendation that the UK “reduces its meat and dairy consumption by 20% by 2030, and by 35% by 2050”
In a blatant rhetorical trick, it tries to make this figure into some kind of compromise by pointing out that some of their witnesses (eg. noted lunatic George Monbiot) advocated eating zero meat or animal products of any kind.
The report is full of this kind of manipulative language.
For example, on page 48, the authors claim that “the Government does not believe it has a role to tell people what to eat”, but then proceed to quote testimony from “experts” who tell them they have a responsibility to tell people what to eat (even though they really don’t want to).
Sue Pritchard argues people aren’t informed or sensible enough to make these decisions, while Professor Tim Lang essentially argues what we eat is chosen for us anyway:
Everyone thinks they choose their diet. We don’t, actually; we choose it by race, by class, by family, by gender, by culture, by when we were brought up, by the power of advertisers and their expenditure. Nearly £1 billion is spent on advertising food in Britain and it is overwhelmingly the ultraprocessed foods that get that advertising. There is very little advertising, let alone national guidance, for eating more appropriately.
“It’s OK to tell people what to do because choice is an illusion”. Beautiful.
The whole report is basically 90 pages of this kind of sophistic nonsense. If you’ve got a strong stomach and a lot of free time, you can read it all here.
We’re just going to focus on the “recommendations” at the end.
There’s this one…
The Government must show its leadership by upholding standards for the environmental impacts of food production in its trading relationships with other countries.
…which, loosely translated, means charging more import taxes on foods that aren’t “environmentally responsible” (or some other buzzphrase). This would mirror legislation in the EU, where the “Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism” has been in place since earlier this year.
Of course, the unwritten consequence of this would be higher prices for ordinary consumers. Oops.
Then there’s this one…
The Government’s plans for a strong food curriculum in schools should include science-based education about the environmental impacts of food production, including food waste.
Which doesn’t need to be translated. It’s about indoctrinating – sorry, educating – children.
Or this one, promoting diet-related propaganda:
We recommend…that the Government should publish national guidance on sustainable diets
And there’s this one, which is my favourite [emphasis very much added]:
The Government does not want to tell people what to eat BUT from its plans to encourage people to eat more healthily it clearly understands its role in helping people make better choices.
Other recommendations call for more “Highly Protected Marine Areas (HPMAs)” to limit fishing in some areas of the sea as well as lowering maximum yield limits.
Still more suggest “sustainability ratings” being made a mandatory part of food labeling, and it’s not hard to see how rating all food purchases on a “sustainability” scale can be parlayed into social credit systems or the like.
Another includes a demand to “designate food security a public good”, like education, infrastructure, and national defense (which I imagine would grant some more powers under some act or other).
It goes on and on.
So, for anyone keeping score at home, the report recommends…
- Using taxpayer money to create and distribute anti-meat propaganda
- Educating children that eating meat is wrong
- Publishing “government recommended diets”
- Controlling where people fish and what they are allowed to catch
- Using taxes to raise the prices of foods that are “bad for the environment”
Don’t worry though, “the Government does not believe it has a role to tell people what to eat”. Honest.
The truth is it goes well beyond simply telling people what to do. Perhaps the most concerning issue in the report is the much-praised “Environmental Land Management” schemes, described as:
a critical lever in incentivising a shift towards achieving food security in the context of environmental change
Here’s how they work…
Environmental Land Management schemes pay farmers to do certain things with their land…including to improve the environment”
You’ll notice it says “including” to improve the environment, not only to improve the environment. They never say what else is included, or what it might be in aid of.
Also, “Paying farmers to do certain things”? That’s very vague, isn’t it?
What exactly are these “certain things”?
Well, there’s a short list included but it doesn’t get much less vague. It mentions:
- “undertaking certain environmentally beneficial actions”
- “activities that support local nature recovery and meet local environmental priorities”
- and“long-term projects that support landscape and ecosystem recovery.”
All of which can be fairly accurately summed up as “not farming”.
Yes, the British government is actively paying farmers not to farm, and – in truly Orwellian fashion – are doing it in the name of “promoting food security”. (You can read about similar schemes in the US and UK here.)
It goes beyond “telling people what to eat”, into the realm of making sure they don’t eat at all.
—
Support Off-Guardian:
I’ve been saying this for years. The UK Nazi regime wants cheap food imports. This frees up more household spending, it makes money for the hospitality industry. and supermarkets.
More sheeple dying younger, more inheritance, more house sales, less good quality UK food production, cheaper imports.
All these tweeks add up, because the Nazi UK has had no real growth since 2008. We have immigration, money printing, constant debt and mortgage restructuring, early death, flooding, pricing your vehicle off the road, and it’s all because we are a failed state.
The UK is like a huge corporation that has given up on business, and relies on mergers and acquisitions to pay dividends and bonuses.
They are even threatening property owners that if they don’t spend on this, that, and the other, usually using debt, then you can’t sell, because your property won’t pass the standards they set. In effect, your property falls in value and becomes unsellable.
Thicko sheeple keep voting, and they just do what they’re told to do.
Highly protected marine areas, HPMA s? WTF! The combined Border Farces of France and Britain can’t stop rubber boats full of asylum seekers crossing the narrowest part of the English Channel FFS.
In case the governments of the world and their masters, TPTB, are unaware, Black or illegal fishing is a huge trans-global undertaking almost impossible to control for a variety of reasons incuding greed and profit let alone a lot of remote areas being fished.
As for paying farmers to do certain things, that would be a form of agricultural subsisdy and unless farmers are stupid when it comes to money, and I have yet to meet one who is, then they will be aware that subsidies may cease as quickly as they started.
Trouble is, many Brit. farmers are tenant farmers with a lack of security.
Yep, its going to get worse before it gets better folks.
A Merry Christmas one and all irrespective of backgrounds and beliefs, the “Force” is always stronger at this time of the year…
As if anything an insignificant postage-stamp sized country such as Britain would have any more effect on (((Climate Change))) – even if it existed! – than a fart would have on the direction of a category 5 hurricane!
LMFAO!!!😂
HeHe.
..Health security..Food security…what they mean by security is securing control…for ahem..’impact investors’… (snake eyed geriatric ghouls in wheelchairs)..
It certainly seems that the elitist class in a desperate bid to stay relevant and rich and in control… has put all it’s eggs in one basket…. unfortunately for them this basket is scientism… from which they hope to derive hehe..new investment opportunities… because that’s what these creatures do..
play the casino…
.. which nowadays is posited on various recipes of injectable dog shit and cancer meat..taxing fresh air and importing Africans on rubber rings…for a fetid little matriarchy with tranny CEO’s… and absolutely no future…
Good luck ladz… remember Lysenko…
Just read Arthur C. Clarke’s ‘Childhood’s End’ to understand what the Overlords have planned for the West & the white race. The book is an allegory of course, the ‘Overlords’ represent the Jews. Those with intelligence can correlate the analogous connections between the book & reality.
Without due care, eating less meat results in poorer health and shorter lives for the masses, which of course is what they want, as they fly around the world in their private jets, wining and dining on finest additive free meat and wines while, lecturing us all on carbon zero (eg no, hoi polloi).
COUNCIL TAX RISES TO PAY FOR MIGRANTS
The exact date council tax is set to double for a key group of homeowners has been revealed. The move is estimated to generate millions for councils in the next fiscal year at a time where local authorities are cash-strapped and struggling across the whole of the UK.
The cost of migrant housing has crippled many councils, and more money must be found for them
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) Pension Credit can be backdated by three months and the deadline to do this, and be entitled to the £299 cost of living payment, is by March 5, 2024. If you’re eligible, you can still get the third cost of living payment if you make a claim for Pension Credit by 5 March 2024 and request for it to be backdated.
Climate Change, the scam of scams.
If true it would be a God send. More heat,,, less ice, more farmland, longer growth periods, more water. More CO2 equals more crop production, more plants, Trees and Grass to feed the cattle and other farm animals.
So, the scammers want another ice age, the result of far less of all the above and more deaths of all animals including humans quite possibly extinction. Gee,,, you don’t suppose the PTB would want that, do you? Of course not! That’s why they keep coming up with these vaxxes like the Covid, Flu, Rsv and others to keep us nice and healthy. Right?
The masses being allowed to eat meat, own cars, travel where they want, live as long as the rich, and have governments give them virtually anything they need or want is terribly unfair to the rich. Clearly, there is no point in being rich in a civilization of abundance where now even the poor can live better than any kings or queens of old, and not even have to work. Being rich used to be a mark of distinction and now any homeless bum can sleep in the best of tents and sleeping bags, and dine on the a variety of meet and milk products prolonging their miserable lives.
Meat, however, presents a much greater threat to the established social order, because when we dine with our servants bringing us the main courses it is most often a meat dish and very often some cut of beef, and there is nothing more disheartening and demeaning to know it is nothing really special and that millions of common people are sitting down at the same time in their automated homes and enjoying the same cuts, all likely coming from the same farms and supermarkets.
When you think about the open spaces and land which are used just for the cattle to graze, the numerous feedlots, milk farms and the ever-expanding meat sections in the grocery stores, and you must realize how much could be accomplished to save the integrity of our class by making things like beef so scarce that only the rich could afford to buy it. But that unfortunately would not solve the problem of class distinction because the common people could still budget in order to buy the food of the rich. Better simply to have the real meat sections of the supermarkets restricted from entry to the common people with their electronic inserts to sound off alarms if they ignore the mandates and try to enter.
So much of our land is now being used for cattle and sheep operations that with the continued rate of economic development of the LDN’s (less developed nations) there neither will be enough land, or cattle and sheep to sustain the demand. It is therefore entirely logical and justified to simply restrict the consumption lest in the future we all should starve in massive famines. This was the very same reasoning our agents used crafting the various sustainability UN agendas. However, it is most unfortunate they have failed to mention this most obvious peril to our status, and instead have chosen simply to focus on cow flatulence allegedly threatening some future climate cataclysm and destroying all life on the planet.
Although there is nothing more communist and leveling than cattle, and an aspect we once hoped the common people would emulate, the problem is that too many of them in becoming socialists have assumed those more passive bovine-like traits of just living to eat, drink, sleep, fart, and copulate, as well as demanding exclusive access to vast open spaces, all of which used to be the exclusive privilege of the rich.
Unless the common people along with all of their domestic creatures bred to feed them are cleared from the land, we will never be able to return to the activities we were bred to enjoy and live for. Better that the vast lands used to produce meats and dairy products be cleared of common people and their animals, and returned to wilderness preserves for the return of pheasants, deer and other beasts of the wild for the exclusive rights and sports of the rich.
Also, by making meat and dairy products less affordable and more restricted to the common people, we trust they will come to known their proper place. We can on longer continue to allow the common people to sustain their numbers and their health with their farms and animals, mainly because that is exactly what disables we the rich from exhibited our prowess and superiority in having more vitality, better physiques, greater intelligence, and much longer lives. Better that they be fed food simulations made from petrochemicals and other more benign substances to help in the process of reducing their numbers.
TRILLIONS COWFARTS PER HOUR BY
NORDSTREAM + MILITARY JETS POISONING
THE AIR !
The old Jewish laws of the temple about sacrifices ended up getting all the best meat into the priests’ lying mouths and it would be the same today in our own countries, where the rich have their own farms, built over centuries by someone else, and then bought
The United Nations’ organization, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), utilizes 40 distinct computer modelling programs to predict global warming trends.
These mapping systems all contradict one another and none are accurate when retroactively applied to the last 100 years of climate data. Despite that, the varying outcomes produced by the digital models are indifferently mined for predictive data, that’s compatible with the political agenda driving the unconscionable scaremongering, favoured by the dark masters.
Not a single one, out of the 40 programs the IPCC relies on, however, factors in the most important variable, governing terrestrial temperature, according to the Nobel Laureate physicist, Dr. John Clauser and his fellow 1600 signatories of the Clintel Foundation, all of whom have unequivocally asserted that there is no climate change crisis.
So what is this excluded but supremely important factor influencing temperature fluctuation? Cloud cover.
Clouds reflect 90% of all solar radiation back into space. On average, between one and two thirds of the Earth is covered by clouds on any given day. Clouds are instrumental in moderating ground temperature and are an integrated fail-safe of eccentricities in solar cycles.
Clouds form from water vapour, for the greater part, rising up from the world’s oceans when water temperature increases. Thus, the warmer the oceans, the greater the cloud cover mitigating against global warming. It is a quite beautifully integrated climatological mechanic. According to Dr. Clauser the combined effect of all so-called greenhouse gases, including CO2 and methane, is completely negligible and surpassed in their impact on meteorology, by at least 200%, by the effect of cloud cover. This, indeed, is why solar panels are so inefficient – because clouds have thermostatic function, preventing any consistent accumulation of solar radiation as a practical energy source.
SPIRITUALITY AND VEGETARIANISM”
Is it necessary ?
One of the biggest questions that puzzles those seeking to lead a spiritual life,
Is the problem of eating animals.
There are those who believe in the often quoted saying of Jesus that, “ it is not what goes into a mans mouth that defiles him, but what comes out “
One could further say that Christ recruited from non-vegetarian fishermen, but the only mention of meat in the bible, did not refer to animal flesh, as meat in ancient Greek meant any solid food.
Remember Jesus was an Essene, and they were an ascetic sect who were not only vegetarian, but also taught reincarnation, and not transmigration as has been clamed in recent books.
This argument over vegetarianism has come up many times over the years , and has been tackled by occult authors Dion Fortune and Lobsang Rampa who both thought it made little difference.
But their studies were carried out in the 1930s and the late 50s, and even last year the subject was handled very badly by the lowbrow mediums newspaper “psychic news”
Recent tests by top universities in Britain found that by running the Bible through a bank of computers it was possible to detect that many alterations had crept in as most scholars accepted over the centuries, so the present bible is not the original bible and today’s Christians are far from the original Christians.
Most versions and this is from the revised standard version say in genesis 1;29 ““behold I have given you every plant yielding seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit, you shall have them for food”
This goes on to declare in Genesis1;30 that no beast would prey on another, and flesh was an unlawful food, until after the flood when god said to Noah,
“The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth,
unto your hand they are delivered, every moving thing that lives shall be food for you and as I gave you in Genesis 1;29 the green plants, I give you everything, only you shall not eat the flesh with its life, that is its blood Gen, 9;2- 4
both flesh eaters and vegetarians use this passage to bolster their beliefs, but it is impossible to eat meat without consuming the blood it contains,
its conclusions are obvious.
The British Medical Journal, among other medical periodicals, claim that 60% of all deaths in Britain are cardio-vascular related, and the next biggest killer Cancer, are both heavily linked to saturated fats consumption from meat..
The scholar Empedocles, summed up eccliastical thinking around the time of the early bible when he said ”the original sin was the killing and eating of gods animals”
The root problem is that world wide wherever animals are reared for their flesh, there is cruelty and abuse, factory farms with forced feeding and mass medication are just one instance.
St. Francis of Assisi is recognised as one of Christianities holiest saints and he was a vegetarian hermit.
Recent problems such as the B.S.E crisis, foot and mouth disease, the Stilbesterol scandal, and others that our government suppressed from us, show that spirituality could not be aligned to such a cruel and exploitative industry.
The Bhagavad-Gita Gita 9;26 also states, “if one offers me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit or water I will accept it”.
This passage infers that god would not accept offerings of flesh, eggs or fish,
yet they do accept milk.
We read in chapter 17 of the Bhagavatam a fight between two kings over animal cruelty,
Although the story can be seen in a figurative way, showing that this is the age of Kali or slaughter, a deeper meaning is visible to scholars suggesting that non harm or “Ahimsa” is most necessary for spiritual progression.
The commandment thou shalt not kill, is regularly fobbed off among Christians as meaning the killing of humans,
If this was the case the commandment would read “thou shalt not commit murder”
A “kill” always refers to an animal.
Christians also say Christ came to redeem humans not animals, yet there is no scriptural basis for this claim, and in fact all versions of the biblical record agree that Christ believed “all life is sacred” and to “love thy neighbour”
are not animals also our neighbours ?
Many Christian scholars claim animals have no souls and are lesser creatures,
This may in part explain why animal cruelty is highest in Christian countries.
But Christ came for the Jews, it was only by altering the doctrines to suit Roman tastes that ensured Christianities survival, and roman Christianity was imposed on England in 664A.D at the Synod of Witby, strangely this site is now a shrine to vampirism, ! however, early Christians maintained god had entrusted animals to our care and we would be judged on how we cared for others.
This is echoed in the holy Koran, every verse bar one starts with the words,
“Allah is merciful and compassionate”
and the prophet himself said ” whoever is kind to animals is kind to god”
A growing tradition of rejecting meat has been gaining ground for a variety of reasons, around the Islamic world.
So we have a tradition in each major world religion where flesh eating is condemned
Except Christianity, but even here many enlightened folk are returning to the original Christian vegetarian concepts, such as in the Seventh day Adventists, and health surveys show a remarkable improvement among their followers.
Certainly studies show vegetarianism does increase sensitivity and spiritual awareness, this is on record with training both motor racing teams and the intelligence services.
The Greek gospels of Thomas particularly, and Philip, say that Christ was, as many scholars have always said, a vegetarian,
and if it was good enough for him, maybe it should be good enough for us.
Any people that are founded upon Ba’al Worship of a renamed Brahma (Abram along with Saraswati-Sara, Diva (woman) Asura-Asherah and Ba’al Haddad the storm god (no YHWH yet) and a plethora of nonsensical perversions to cannibalism of infants who are beat, bled and eaten (yes, it is documented and is fact of the anti-human anti-chosen just as Ab-El is Anti-God if you have clue of what the construction and wordsmithing of allegories which make the OT and their tripe of Talmuds nothing more than the ideals of the most insidious cretans that have ever walked the earth. Blood sacrifice and cannibalism are the mainstays of this stupid group of the chosen to wipe out all life and in the process have any reverence of creation.
I will never believe in any birthright of any people and especially those that lie perpetually and murder, steal, and consider creation as something as something one can own. When did anyone come up with the idea water can be owned and hoarded as only an idiot would believe it can be nothing more than a resource and not belong to all creatures (damns and the rest are an abomination. Egyptian 42 commandments are vastly superior and older by 800 years or more than a fake Moses. Abram, “a righteous man” has no seed as semen is not a seed, but the seed of god is the ideas that we plant, grow and spread for good fruit and more seeds to be spread among those of the world.
There is no written word of anyone’s god but is it is in the creation story and is much better told of the Egyptians P’Tah.
Kemet Ancient Egypt
“God hath made the universe,
And He hath created all that therein is…
He is the Creator of the world,
And it was He who fashioned it with His hands
before there was any beginning …
What His heart conceived came to pass…
And when He had spoken His word came to pass,
And it shall endure forever.”
Neb Ra Techer, God Almighty
It’s very simple; No Farms, No Food.
Only the dangerously stupid would think ingesting “food” (or would that be “fauxed”?) created in the lab of some depraved pseudo-scientist then puked out of an assembly line in a filthy factory is acceptable. Of course, we were not getting far from that anyway in many places with the way the “food” industry was going.
I am fortunate to have a sizable garden, some of my friends have excellent productive chickens that are sensibly and naturally maintained, and I am otherwise as careful as I can be about any store-bought products. It sickens me to hear of the herds of imbeciles waddling into some corporate behemoth shit-hole like a Walmart to do their “grocery” shopping as they pay to be poisoned. In a way, f*ck ’em for being lazy and stupid and the Darwin Effect isn’t working nearly fast enough to remove those bloated imbeciles from the gene pool.
There is some excellent commentary by several truth-seekers above! After the “central banking” credit & fake money scam, which is at the root of every other evil machination to degrade and destroy humanity, “Climate Change” is the scam of scams, as ken mentions above at the beginning of his outstanding comment.
In the “protocols,” the Jews openly declare that all agendas being utilized against their enemies must result in the single most important result : SUBMISSION.
Nothing will get people to SUBMIT faster and more completely than STARVATION.
Got it ?
Government has too much of your money…. Starve it.
It is to promote food INSECURITY – a prelude to rationing and the introduction of the Social Credit system.
Some years ago in the UK, long before the Coronavirus scam, was the E-coli scare, in which it was argued that all private production of food (back gardens and the like), should be illegal in order to ‘protect the children’.
This or some variation on it will be heard again. Home growers in the UK have noticed that the fertility of over the counter fruit and vegetable seeds has declined markedly. This is not a coincidence.