Robert Bridge – Strategic Review Sept 24, 2023
Once again, a courageous soul who challenged the establishment has been virtually silenced – tarred, feathered and portrayed as guilty of sexual assault before any trial has begun. Is this another example of a media-coordinated hit job against an inconvenient voice?
Imagine what a wonderful world it would be if journalists dug into stories like ‘Russian election collusion’ and ‘Hunter Biden’s laptop’ with the same amount of gusto as they do with stories involving the sordid sex lives of celebrities. And not just any celebrities, but specifically those who have touched the third rail, so to speak, exposing the establishment for their egregious crimes against humanity.
Russell Brand is/was that sort of spirited and fearless individual. While initially part of the Hollywood circuit, appearing in films and performing stand-up comedy, the loquacious Brit eventually found himself ostracized from tinsel town after pointing out during the 2013 GQ Awards that the sponsor of the event, Hugo Boss, manufactured uniforms for the Nazi Party during World War II.
Having successfully torched his Hollywood career, Brand began to focus attention on his YouTube channel, where his fierce wit, intelligence and machine-gun-style delivery saw his number of subscribers climb to almost 7 million in 10 years. These are the sort of figures that land social media personalities on the ‘truth radar,’ a system backed by an army of left-wing fanatics and civil rights nut jobs devoted to enforcing ‘community standards’ with pure fascist fervor. Brand fell so far afoul of the mainstream media narrative that he was playing in an entirely differently stadium.
It’s hard to say exactly when the powers-that-be decided to take down the YouTube sensation, but his March 2023 appearance on the Bill Maher show would be a safe bet. Appearing alongside John Heilemann, a national affairs analyst with MSNBC, and Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders, Brand went on a tangent about the Covid-19 pandemic and the pharmaceutical industry.
“The pandemic created at least 40 new Big Pharma billionaires; pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made $1,000 in profit every second from the Covid-19 vaccines; more than two-thirds of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in the 2020 election; Pfizer Chairman Albert Bourla told Time magazine in July 202 that his company was developing a Covid vaccine for the good of humanity, not for money, and of course Pfizer made a $100 billion dollars in profit in 2022.”
Maher, desperately trying to get a word in edgewise on his own show, reminded Brand that “a lot of people would be dead without the vaccine.”
To which Brand snapped back: “If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies, where the military industrial complex benefits from war, where energy companies benefit from energy crisis, you are going to generate states of permanent crisis where the interests of ordinary people separate from the interests of the elite.”
Thus, in a matter of seconds, Brand laid bare the inner workings of the business world and ‘crisis capitalism,’ where the solutions to society’s myriad problems, many of them manufactured, work to the benefit of the corporations and political elite at the expense of tax-paying society as a whole. These are utterances rarely mentioned on primetime television.
Whether by chance or design, on September 16, a joint investigation conducted by the Times, Sunday Times and Channel 4 Dispatches was published, detailing four separate sexual-assault allegations, including one charge of rape, made against Brand that were said to have occurred between 2006 and 2013.
Brand vehemently denies the allegations and in a video said he had been “very promiscuous” in the past, but all of his relationships had been “absolutely, always consensual”.
All of this is very suspect. After all, 10 years is a long time, so what compelled four women to make allegations against Brand simultaneously. The obvious answer is that these media groups dispatched a goon squad of investigate journalists to find women who were ‘violated’ by Russell Brand, and considering the reprehensible reputation of the British media this was undoubtedly a simple task, and even more so when monetary incentives are included. Of course, this is not to suggest that Brand is innocent of the charges; he may very well have committed heinous acts in his past. We just don’t know. But it forces one to question why these very serious allegations are surfacing now. Is the British media really so desperate for stories that it had to open an investigation into Russell Brand’s past sex life? No, clearly this was a well-planned operation to destroy the man. And it seems they are succeeding.
YouTube announced that it had “suspended [monetization] on Russell Brand’s channel for violating our Creator Responsibility policy…If a creator’s off-platform behavior harms our users, employees or ecosystems, we take action to protect the community.”
It seems like the real harm here is the perception that YouTube would eject a member of its “ecosystem” without due process first.
—
Ever since the emergence of the #MeToo movement, the legacy media and social media have developed a mob justice mentality, refusing to allow for the possibility that the accused (male) may actually be innocent. In fact, that’s the agenda from the start. And it goes without saying that the media are in the extremely powerful position to mold public opinion to their will. This was evident in a Channel 4 video of the anonymous victims, some of them portrayed by actual actors, discussing their experiences. The production is complete with ominous background music and close-up silhouettes of the emotional women. This is cinematic manipulation that would certainly help to sway the public, not to mention some future jury, and not in a way favorable to Russell Brand’s defense team. Why is the media, which is supposed to take an unbiased approach to its reporting, resorting to manipulating the emotions of their audience? The answer is obvious.
Much like was the case with Julian Assange, who faced similar age-old charges after releasing information damning to the U.S. establishment, Brand is a very articulate individual who is not afraid of speaking truth to power. Much like Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, and hundreds of other dissident voices, his anti-establishment opinions could not be tolerated, and once again the mainstream media was activated to do the dirty work of character assassination. It’s a sick reality, but that’s the depraved sort of ‘journalism’ Western audiences can expect to receive – until they demand better.
PLEASURE ISLAND
As info from Gislane Maxwell is coming out about how Prince Andrew
was blackmailed by Epstein on the sex with children “pleasure island” activities
and the sex lives of UK Royals and politicians
One of the worst was Lord Mountbatten, who liked brown skinned boys aged 8 – 12
this is a favourite age for homosexuals and Philip Schofield we are told liked black boys
the same age.
Guy Burgess claimed that Lord Mountbatten was more of a sick pervert than he was
and security were told that Certain car numbers traveling to the Kincora Boys Home
were ” too big to touch” and were not to be stopped
One car carrying BBC personalities was stopped by mistake and Wilfed Bramble Frankie Howard Kenny Everett and Allen ” Fluff ” Freeman, said the BBC lawyers would put in a strong complaint
about them being stopped. The reason Mountbatten was killed by the IRA was because he was serially buggering irish boys and some were being killed after
BBC D J Paul Gambacinni who turned queens evidence on Savile and others claimed
Saville was warned by Mossad to not go to Kincora again
The independent enquiry into child abuse (IICSA) showed no interest in Mountbatten and senior figures at westminsters activities or the BBC, the wreath of documents on this just disapeared
Professor Alexis Jay of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse which was set up to investigate child sex abuse by VIPs and has ignored the evidence about the Anglo-Irish Vice Ring of which Mountbatten was a member. In 1987 Mountbattens driver whistleblew that Mountbatten would wear all his medals then dress his young victims in girlie baby clothes before assaulting them, for driving the boys in the official humber he was paid £5 per week for his silence
he also whistleblew on Greville Janner.
The boys were given a cocktail of brandy and lemonade with an unknown tablet before the assaults. Lord Rothschild sent Peter Wright author of the book ” Spycatcher” fame a first class ticket to come see him, Rothschild told Peter Wright nothing about this episide can appear in his book and the whole first chapter was taken out. Mountbatten was a naval man during w w 2 he kept insisting that any government money must be used to build more ships, while Churchill’s Air Chief, Marshall Dowding was the genius behind using the secret enigma Info to bomb German aircraft on the ground, Mountbatten wanted Lord Dowding sacked and humiliated, Dowding had a furious argument with Churchill and wanted the firebombing of German hospitals and Schools stopped and also begged churchill not to steal the harvest from India and leave half for the people. Churchill’s decision meant almost 5 million indians starved to death Mountbatten was totally the wrong person to over see Indian independence and the huge blood shed which followed can be laid directly at Mountbatten and Churchill’s feet and the man who controlled and ran them and other satanists and perverts and even allowed kids to be sodomised and at times killed Lord Rothschild.
Male sexuality, in its origin and essence, makes the male side a genetic parasite, but, given this system, the female may be choosing her parasite: even in Japan, a third of people were found to not have the father they thought they had, because genes from the male side are attacking strangers. Psychopaths can be very charming and their genes can trick their way into a host: the battle of exploitation goes on forever
And one of the chief witnesses for the prosecution on the Assange case was none other than The Guardian!.
And this rotten rag today keeps advertising itself as supporting the poor and investigating corrupt regimes.
The audacity of these cnuts is breathtaking.The Editor is of course jewish!.
Women have always wielded sex as the main weapon in their handbag..of course nowadays even though they are ruffty tufty career gals and better than men at being a fireman or copper…
They can’t be held responsible for their poor sexual choices…even if it’s some obese ugly jewe that masturbates in plant pots..or some weaselly one with a whiny voice they sext message incessantly… no no…at that point women are the victims of ‘abuse’.. little innocent girls….the weaker sex..(the one and only time)..
Of course they will still be writing love letters to these dolts when the regime and its hacks have made sure they are are banged up.. and when the breakfast TV gigs and so called ‘public outrage’ dry up..
They did Assange the same way…unsurprisingly
No comment!!!🤢
Brand always gave me bad vibes, but most womanizers do. No reason for me to call him a criminal, much less try to interfere with his livelihood. I hope he gets a fair trial, but doubt he will because, with no hard evidence against him, only he-said, she-said, he shouldn’t even be arrested.
Ask him to explain all his huggin’ n’ lovin’ with Schwab’s Boy Toy Harari before you label him a ‘truth warrior’.
You are all wrong on him as a person hes a scumbag guilty of all charges. But it is WRONG so censor him the way they have done and are doing. Prioirties. This is not a poliltical battle
I do not believe the allegations made against him.
Russel Brand is decent looking and rich, and has an outgoing personality – thus he can get all the pussy he wants. I bet a whole lot of girls are lined up, on his smart phone, giving him invites, etc.
Basically Russel Brand is a pussy magnet, everywhere he goes pussy is throwing themselves at him.
Thus he has no need to do what he is accused of.
I will tell you something else I do not believe AT ALL – how Trump is suddenly 10 points above Biden in the betting odds and polling.
Biden has sucked since day 1, even his own base thinks he sucks, so this idea that Joe Biden was above Trump in polling at any point in the last two years is utter bullshit.
Biden did not win the election, he is a shameless grifter who was installed. Everyone knows that, so at what point was Biden ever above Trump?
NEVER! Just think what I am saying. The fact is Trump won by a landslide yet through ballot stuffing Biden was installed – a completely fraudulent president if there ever was one.
BIDEN WAS NEVER ABOVE TRUMP IN THE POLLS, not even for a short time.
So look at this chart: https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html#chart
The blue line for Biden was above the orange line for Trump – until last week – when all of a sudden, for no reason at all – Trump is beating Biden by 10 points.
That means those polls are bullshit also, what is going on it theater, poor old Joe has to be removed because, you see, he is dropping in the polls.
So you all better listen to me, they are bringing in someone worse than pedo Joe, they are going to replace him with that piece of Jew shit from Calipornia – Jabbin’ Newscum – who will magically rise in the polls, and beat Trump.
And don’t forget, Swami Ramalamadingdong will be pushed off the table along with RFK Jr.
Is this the same Brand that frequented toilets like a certain Tony ? An anti nationalist c***
@ Rixon Stewart
His analysis may be overly cautious but it is certainly worth giving consideration to the advice of Blackbelt Barrister, with regard to a potentially sneaky application of contempt of court statutes, in the reporting of the Russell Brand farrago.The running time is 12 minutes and 31 seconds;
https://youtu.be/2e9kp7fQYIE?si=YkH-2Ju82tPyIQ9S
I remember watching a stage tv show eons ago which had Brand as the guest, anyway the commentator called out a beautiful known porn star from the audience for Brand to seduce. He was friggen hopeless and the look on the porn star’s face of disappointment was clear to see for all. Hell she knows real men. He is guilty he is guilty of being a cheap b rated hack Richard cranium.
As for metoo they are simply jungle bunnies getting around while the gettin is good. Opportunists the worst the world has to offer. Don’t they know about what happened to the Bolsheviks, Stalin killed them for not creating the utopia they promised.
“Ask him to explain all his huggin’ n’ lovin’ with Schwab’s Boy Toy Harari before you label him a ‘truth warrior’.”
Thank you Occam’s!!!
That’s pretty much all anyone needs to understand about him to realize that he’s a dirtbag one way or another.
Brand is pure deep state.
Believe nothing of this charade.
It is either a means to rehabilitate a compromised agent whose background is becoming too widely known, or a set-up to create yet more legislation or legal precedent to further disempower, silence or marginalise the people.
It may be both.
Look here https://www.bitchute.com/video/wVOh1SMILGYx/
andyay: I used to watch BlackBelt, and he’s an idiot. Here he is using all the contempt of court rubbish, when the Nazi fake news has prosecuted Russell Brand, end off.
Every single thicko ewe should have gone to the police and made a statement, and then it’s upto the police and DPP to decide on a course of action. Note, no one in the fake news should know any of this. Of course, the police are corrupt, but that doesn’t change the fact that the fake news has no business until an arrest has been made.
There’s absolutely no chance Brand can get fair legal process given what the fake news has done.
I might add that while Mr BlackBelt knows a lot, he’s often very biased and completely wrong. I’ve seen many comments to his videos where he’s taken to task. My own view is that he’s a ultra right wing Nazi, and I’m entitled to express my opinion. Note, he likes martial arts, his decor is that of a deranged corporate with zero empathy. He often has ornamental weapons in his videos, and IMHO, he chats like a Nazi, and dresses like a Nazi.
Carl Jones–Nazis are good, but are/were never intended to win, just be a head-on-a-stick in the market place
Well, Carl, I did offer the caveat that “his analysis may be overly cautious.”
I usually watch YouTube on television and comments can’t be accessed on the big screen format.
You are absolutely entitled to express your opinions and I would never call for you to be banned, as seems to have become commmonplace recently.
You can grrrh but can you purr?