Mattias Desmet – Substack.com Aug 14, 2023
Dr. John Clauser, Nobel laureate in Physics 2022, recently made a remarkable statement: the climate narrative is a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. My chest opened and filled with fresh relief as I read these words.
It’s not that I think we should wallow in unrestrained comfort and luxury, flying to Barcelona to get our hair cut. The silence of nature is worth more to me than a Bugatti. I love the fresh mountain air more than the most delicate perfume; the teeming light of dusk more than the glitz and glory of all the world’s cities combined.
And it’s not that I don’t know there are a thousand other scientists for every John Clauser. Nobel laureate or not, John Clauser is an exception. Opposing him is the consensus of the academic community.
But what is that consensus actually worth? Is it the product of genuine passion for knowledge? Or is it rather the result of rampant mass formation among academics, fear of stigmatization (“climate denial”), the thirst for research resources, and perhaps even some pleasure in spreading the doomsday message?
In addition to these phenomena, there is undoubtedly also the ideological dominance of globalist institutions such as the United Nations. The climate narrative is largely a product of the propaganda with which these institutions push their technocratic agenda. Aided by their army of “digital first responders,” the UN censors any voice that criticizes their ideological program.
Academic consensus eventually comes about as follows: those who do not endorse the dominant narrative are removed from the “A List” of scientists who have clout, credentials, and funding, until it can be said that “all scientists” endorse the dominant narrative. Ask yourself: how likely is it that tens of thousands of scientists around the world all agree? Such a consensus could only be a curated consensus.
Where has this kind of pseudo consensus led us in recent year? Well, among other unfortunate places, to a widespread belief that the coronavirus would kill more than 80,000 people in Sweden by the end of May 2020 if the country did not go into lockdown and that the vaccine would prevent transmission of the virus. And if the woke discourse continues to gain momentum, the consensus will soon be that there is no biological difference between a man and a woman.
Real science comes from an individual’s courage to break through the consensus, not from false deference to “the consensus.” John Clauser performed the highest political act a human being can perform: exposing himself to the risk of social exclusion by speaking sincerely in public space. And indeed, the backlash, and the frenzy to cancel him, began immediately after he spoke up.
Dissenting opinions are dismissed with rhetoric such as “most scientists agree that things are this or that, why would that lone exception be correct?”. But we can also reason the other way around: only a commitment to the truth will give you the courage to risk the ostracism of your peers, and even your entire professional standing.
Moreover, what masquerades as “climate science” is increasingly taking the form of propaganda. I frown upon the relentless media coverage that portrays every hot day as a climate apocalypse, and that presents man-made wildfires and even the sudden increase in miscarriages and blood clots as the result of global warming.
Beginning next year, you can even pursue a master’s degree in “climate psychology” at Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. You will learn how to get the population involved in the climate story. I can, of course, somewhat understand the logic by which well-intentioned people might pursue such a degree: given man’s insatiable thirst for comfort and luxury, the masses will drive the world straight to ruin; so there is no other option than to manipulate the masses back on track.
The choice of propaganda is therefore understandable in a sense, but nevertheless extremely problematic for a number of reasons. First, its excessive use to save humanity is internally contradictory. The backbone of the human being, the fiber of the social fabric, is honest and trustworthy speech. A society based on propaganda is, by definition, the end of humanity.
Second, those who believe they must manipulate the masses are no better off morally than the masses themselves. Remember the hundreds of private jets and super-yachts at the climate conferences . . . where solutions were supposedly being sought for the climate problem?
Third, the ecomodernist solution to “the climate problem” that runs throughout the discourse of the UN is not the solution to the problem- it is rather the cause of it. Concentrating humanity in uniform housing units in 15-minute cities, detonating nitrate bombs in the stratosphere to block sunlight, banning farmers from working their land, switching to insect meal and lab-printed food, planting artificial trees to filter CO2 from the air – doesn’t all that seem more dangerous than eating a steak, especially from an animal raised by a small local farmer, and driving a diesel car? Insofar as there are real problems with nature, it’s this rationalistic hubris, which pursues a world as artificial as possible, that is the cause rather than the solution .
So, just keep doing what we’re doing? As I said above: I do think that we must be concerned about human impact on nature. For example, I believe that the problem of microplastics and plastic soup in the oceans is real, that industrial farming destroys the soil and that industrial fish farming threatens life in the oceans. And when I’m on the steppe in Africa and I feel a sacred silence palpable in the air, a rending realization overwhelms me that, in our “progress,” we have lost the essence of life.
This is the real task we face: to distinguish false problems from real problems and to find real solutions to the real problems, beyond ecomodernism. That is the best way to render propaganda powerless and secure a livable future for life on earth and future generations.
In another Article Henry Makow “PhD” argues that universities are masonic brainwashing machines.
Here we have a “Nobel” prize winner arguing something we have known for decades. (And it is brave of him. I wonder if they will take back his prize because he said something that could be construed of “racism” twenty years ago or some other pretext.)
This is the thing: establishment endorsement is being used to challenge the establishment consensus. Alternative thinkers are still saying “listen to me, I have letters and endorsements and I represent an aristocratic mindset that I will lead you, the humble reader, to the Promised Land….”
It is argument based on the marshalling of evidence that really counts….
Simon Smith, BSc, PGCE, 1974 Cycling Proficiency Certificate holder, and FREQUENT second prize winner in a well-known beauty contest…
Mass formation.
Everyone is being led.
But who are the leaders in Satan’s playground?
As we speak the South Eastern part of North Amerika is separating from the mainland and the Seaway is splitting. There is subduction from Canada to Oregon to California causing fires from hot earth. Fires on Hawaii. were caused by subduction of shifting rock, the Pacific is compressing. We are on the verge of the separation and when it happens there is no economy left to speak of, worldwide but barter. It’s not only Amerika, yesterday the seafloor at Tell Aviv was boiling. ‘Scientists’ are also suffering from cognitive dissonance to the cause of this hot earth.
Once again, Yukon Jack is light years ahead of academia and alt media.
“rampant mass formation among academics, fear of stigmatization (“climate denial”)”
Which is why I was a one of the few lone rangers blogging since 2009 about the climate hoax. Academics, like all people in the “system” or matrix of control dare not go against the Jew narrative or be ruined.
It is about time the learned PhD’s speak up because the Biden monster, WEF, Newsome, UN IPCC are shutting it all down, eliminating incandescent lightbulbs, natural gas heating and cooking, gasoline powered cars, lawmowers, motorcycles, etc.
The CO2 warming effect is almost all in the first 20ppm because CO2 warming goes down as an inverse logarithmic saturation effect:
https://i.ibb.co/nnsVgbQ/221717-30c7d1810a08558e84cdb92112602783.png
Ice age CO2 normally varies 180 ppm in the ice age, and 280 ppm in the interglacial, that is far enough out on the curve that the effects of the sun and orbital cycles outweigh any CO2 forcing.
Less than 100 people on the planet understand the Pleistocene megafauna wipeout was caused by low CO2, CO2 dipped all the way down to 140 ppm, plants died, then animals died. That is a little known secret almost not a soul knows.
http://clivebest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Details-Eemian.png
Match up low CO2 in chart above, with dead animal timeline below:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ab/5f/ed/ab5fedad504791deb310263cdbe1da21.jpg
(Be sure to check reverse horizontal time scale as geologist often present charts with now to the far left)
During the ice age, farming is not possible when CO2 goes below 240 ppm
The industrial age started with CO2 at 280 ppm, at bare recovery levels.
https://imgpile.com/images/11u9TR.gif
Plant growth rate has doubled in the last 50 years from rising CO2, and will double again in this century, look up plant growth rate vs. CO2 concentration.
Plants stop growing at 200 – 220 ppm
Animals die off with CO2 below 180 ppm.
During the last ice age, everything was cold and dead, and dust storms raged, see purple line for EPIC dust data. Ice ages
https://i.ibb.co/3S3pJqK/megafauna-mass-extinctions-CO2-starvation-plants-did-not-grow-in-ice-age.png
———————
Another Yukon Jack first:
Grey Aliens put humans on earth to save the planet from low CO2. Humans are like worker ants, digging everything up and burning fossil fuels (because they lack fur). Now that we have done a great job (and shed a billion tears) they will replace us with sentient robots and we the organic life will be removed. Souls will be striped from the human body, captured, and taken to the next planet needing terraforming.
There is no salvation with Jesus in the afterlife, that is an Grey Alien telepathically transmitted myth to calm the human specie to get them to accept their slave existence. Humans will put up with anything so long as they believe in heaven. The only real heaven is space civilization which is using you like toilet paper.
We, as a specie, are incredibly dumb, to save ourselves we need to stop Ai and bipedal robots.
It’s not a “consensus”.
Most hard scientists think climate science is junk science.
The “consensus” is comprised of a vocal minority who
are paid to manufacture “the science”.
The hard scientists (Physicists, Engineers, ,Chemists, Mathematicians etc)
are the ones that count because their studies are quantitative
and materially coherent observations,
While they DO sometimes have observation made based on assumptions, it is
NOT the norm like it is in Biological “sciences”, Psychology, Economics,
Social “sciences”, and the Climate Change Religion of the Club of Rome.
Apollonius of Tyana was the original Christos,
studied + meditated in Kerala india . concil of
Nicaea + Cesar Konstantinus the great under the
influence of his jewish wife judaized all + later
popes of Vatican destroyed all figures of Apollonius .
capt ayit vadacajil
the masonic establishment couldn’t program all its students into parrots. never underestimate the gift human beings’ potential possesses. it’s a loose cannon. when the control freaks think the mission is accomplished that’s when the cannon is fired to free mankind.