HenryMakow.com – July 1, 2023
Brother Nathaniel- “The corruption the Jew innately carries within his essential self, corrupts all society like a deadly poison.”
Makow- I condemn Brother Nathaniel for this racist drivel. Most Jews are assimilated. They are stupid and cowardly like their Gentile counterparts. But they are not inherently evil nor do they celebrate Jesus’ crucifixion.
(“Children, would you like to buy some candy?” The Jewish Pedophile)
The issue is the Jewish supremacist agenda which is imposed top-down by the Cabalist (Masonic) Jewish bankers – i.e. the WEF. Most Jews do not know about it or subscribe to it. Nathaniel is just helping the Jewish supremacists by allowing them to ascribe legitimate resistance to “racism.” I urge Gentiles to focus their antisemitism on the Jews who are actually instrumental in their enslavement, sickness, impoverishment, and deaths. i.e. the WEF, the Biden admin, CDC; as well as on Masonic traitors (the UN, WHO, IMF, and other globalist institutions.)
Brother Nathaniel disproves his own thesis. He is a good Jew.
The Good Jew
By Brother Nathaniel – (henrymakow.com)
The Good Jew
Doesn’t exist.
There’s no such thing as a “good Jew…”
…it’s an oxymoron.
You simply can’t be “good” and a “Jew” at the same time.
Objections hit me from all sides.
First.
The Christian Jews in the photo are not Jews. The real ones are like the one in the Streicher cartoon, and he was a Jew too, because Nazism was an important scheme of theirs. Makov and Kapner have a Sectarian quarrel going on, while Europe has revved its Rolls-Royce engine away from religion
The problem we all have is that we identify with our age, race, religion, gender, football team, and so on.
This is very natural. Because it is natural, does not mean it is how we should consciously align ourselves. When I consider myself as an older white heterosexual English male, I set myself up for a dialectic with those not sharing my characteristics. All human being do this. From the point of view of biological survival and procreation it is natural, but the inner turmoil that it brings — and I share this with all of us — might gainsay indulging in it all. Being angry at the world is not (spiritually) useful.
By indulging in excessive identification, we become chess pieces for someone else to move. In France, it is likely that government agencies have stoked the fires — metaphorically speaking — in order for the “sense of outrage” to generate “order out of chaos”.
***
It is ironic that two Jews are factoring into their discourse the idea of another, Jesus — often cited as a Jew — who never actually lived. (Bible bashers, please leave your voluminous “proof” on YouTube. I like to think The Truthseeker is an oasis from your drivel.)
Are Jews a race or a religion? Given the genetic similarity with other semites — by definition — and the intermarriage that throw up blond as well as big noses, I conclude Judaism is a belief system — a religion — above all else.
As a religion, like Islam, it cannot be sanctioned as “fair”. It seeks hegemony over those outside of the group. I believe Makow might be right about rank and file Jews, however, any people whose tradition is hegemony over others — again Islam as well — cannot help but draw from its well of beliefs to assert the ingroup over the outgroup. Christianity by the same token, is the philosophy of slaves. All the big three have saving graces. They must have, because the hijacking of human spirituality demands the counterfeit currency of organised religion have some bone fide aspects.
Judaism as an ingroup specific ideology allows for an us versus them worldview – a schizophrenic view that oscillates between being “God’s Chosen” and “everyone hates us”. This schizophrenia — evidently more prevalent in Jews according to the author of “Political Ponerology” — is what is worked upon by higher Jews – traditionally the Pharisees, but now the likes of the ADL and so on. I agree with Laurent Guyénot, author of “From Yahweh to Zion”: that the Jews themselves were the first victims of Judaism.
The leveraging of “us against them” is very useful for the Rothschilds who can hide behind the “antisemitism” shield. As Makow has pointed out — Guyénot too — rank and file Jews should see their use has being chess pieces to provide this cover. My take on Jews — “Jews” by virtue of associating as Jews — are not happy people. This, because of the schizophrenia of the belief system itself. I cannot agree that Jews are inherently evil as some do here, but given the ingrained nature of belief and the aspiration of worldly power that a religion that only believes in aspiring for success in the material world does, I can see why those calling themselves Jews have attained disproportionate power in the world.
A good Christian is a slave. A good Muslim is a marauding killer. A good Jew is an hegemonist. These have been the traditional mindspaces. Some realising the modern secular “-isms” bemoan the death of religion. What they are doing is just falling for another dialectic. (I watched a video of John Coleman recently. He fall for this trap.)
***
It is often said that converts are the biggest arguers for their cause. This has always been observed of ex-smokers. I think Henry Makow and “Brother” Nathaniel have sought to oppose their original religious belief by adopting an equally erroneous religion. I also have to reflect on the nature of John Coleman, who has a naturalised American, came across as more American than the American themselves. There is a missionary zeal about converts who seek to overidentify with another group and so remove themselves from their former allegiance; the trick however is, is to have no allegiance except to the truth.
Yes..one can see how this could be… ahem….problematic..for Henry’s rather inconsistent ‘narrative’…
because of course Brother Nathaniel deals exclusively with ‘jewe’ perfidy and evil.. as it is… in the world..
whereas Henry tends to blame distinctly ‘jewish’ criminality on some imaginary clowns from a Dan Brown comic…
You see..in Henry’s world creatures lie Georgie Soreass and Gerald Nadler..and Barbara Spectre..don’t exist..
and neither does the lDF or the stolen state where Maury and Shirley (holocost surviors) nibble Matzo on a Sunday as they watch little children being butchered..
so they can steal their country…
of course they’d be the first to accuse you of racism too.. as their activist family in Noo York’s diaspora works tirelessly to pile in the immigrants and empty the prisons.. and finger ‘nazis’..
Because they are ‘Good’ people..you see…
THE WISE ALWAYS A MINORITY !
@ AL THOMPSON
LIKE I THINK + JESUS UNPROVEN !
Brother Nathaniel- “The corruption the Jew innately carries within his essential self, corrupts all society like a deadly poison.”
That is a true statement and Makow contests it. I live in a town with many Jews, and many of them you might think are “good”, modern Liberals. But is a modern liberal good? They support abortion. And what Jew doesn’t hate Hitler? Makow hates Hitler and writes endless diatribes claiming he worked for someone else – as a way to diminish the greatest man who ever lived.
And how many time have you ever heard Brother Nathaneal praising Hitler? Zero. But oh yeah he loves Christ – the Jewish savior (who never existed).
Henry – every Jew I ever met, in person, online, is 100% percent in support of abortion. This past year we learned that religious Jews view it as part of their religion.
Secondly, every single Jew I have met in southern Oregon is 100% convinced of global warming by CO2. And just about every healthy white male thinks it is false. Why is that?
Jews have tribal solidarity, and thus “instinctively” defend the Jewish narrative – and with the climate change agenda – they are planning on taking our freedom to drive away, or use natural gas, etc. AND THEY ARE DOING IT.
Thirdly, you can not argue with a Jew and win, even if you are factually, morally correct. No Jew I ever met gives a rat’s ass about truth. They care about money, power, position.
I bet very few Jews on the planet would like this website, the truthseeker website. My observation, is that the Jews as a race care about power over truth, and thus they care about the narrative over facts.
Perhaps there are some good Jews. I just have never met one. And don’t tell me that crap about Jesus being a good Jew. No man is perfect, and to claim this one Jew was perfection is just tribal propaganda – ‘see, see Goyim – God was a Jew’.
Jesus is a fictional character in a plagiarized sun god narrative. And in the fable of this Jew Zeus, Jesus affirmed the Torah – which means Jesus affirmed the curse of the law on us.
The Torah and human freedom are opposed, we can never be free so long as that book with Moses and the Commandments are shoved down our throats.
The Torah is the most evil book ever written because the Torah beget the Talmud, and the Talmud beget the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and that beget Israel, the most evil state every invented. Zionism is a direct result of the Torah, Jewish beliefs and teachings, and you can’t have Israel unless you believe the Bible.
Israel plans on bankrupting every government, grinding all nations into dust, stealing all of the world’s wealth, and killing off 99% of the Gentiles. The Jews believe that in the end times every Jew will have 2,000 Goyim slaves and all the rest will be dead.
And with the world wars, and now the Jew death jab, Jews are killing off the Goyim. In Jewkraine the Jews send white Christian Ukrainiums to their death. Soon, they will blow the nuke power plant or some other false flag to make the war bigger, and start “processing” white Europeon Christian boys into the meat grinder.
Do you hate paperwork – your sacred life reduced to forms that you must fill out for the courts, you must get a number when born, pass tests, pay fees, get licenses, permits.
That is all Jewish is, and you can thank the Jew for making you a cog in his machine of death.
There are no good Jews, folks, anyone claiming to be a Jew is claiming exclusive membership to the god based death cult.
And is Makow a good Jew. Remember he claimed to be Christian, but now he is defending Jewry – so his conversion was just a ploy to get your ear.
Most Jews whether they benefit from it or not, know of the vast money power their exclusive tribal solidarity has earned them, and that when it comes to outsiders calling them “good” or “evil”, they simply say, “Look who is calling the pot black. “Shocked” descendants of the Caucasians tribes which raped and pillaged the world, exterminating native people in their way while exploiting the weak of their own kind now complain that the Jews are “unfair” and oppressive. They are upset that the Jews are suppressing and kicking Arabs out of Israel, the original homeland of the Jews. Obviously, none of these actions are good or right in the eyes of God, and underneath the Christian veneer of Western civilization, history remains a battle of might versus right with the progress of right suffering many setbacks with hypocrisy and compromises around every corner.
However, at least Brother Nathaniel can complain because his origins are Jewish and he does have some objective standards of right and wrong. His idea of what is right is at least based on something he has found holy which he does not believe that Judaism in all of its forms provides to Jews or to gentiles. Henry also does have very strong standards of right and wrong, which as a Christian I do not see much different from my own faith.
A “good” Jew to one Jew may be a “bad” one to another. In secular society the reason we are so fragmented is that in abandoning our traditional Christians standards which are largely Judaic based on both the New and Old Testaments, there is even less reason for Jews or anyone else not to be totally relativistic as to what is actually “good” and what is “evil”. In such a fragmented society, just as Henry has said so often, it is ruled by Satan and his minions, and likely by what he calls the “Illuminati”, which as far as I can see has a very evil idea of what is “right”.
To find a “good” person anywhere and in any tribe you simply have to judge them by their works. As for another good Jew in our midst, I would pick Arthur Herman. His book, “The Cave and the Light”, in my view ought to be standard reading in our high schools.
Where to start! I have had the privilege of having my accurate comment that if David of the Bible were alive today he would be considered a war criminal and guilty of crimes against humanity. One is not allowed to attack or criticize the sacred cow of Judaism. However, there is not a human tribe or nation that at sometime has not committed horrendous crimes.
Then there is the problem of who do we blame for all the wrongs of the World. Modern Christianity has no resemblance to the teachings of Jesus. So much evil has been done in the name of the Christ. From the beginning his teachings were subverted and his followers of ‘the message’ oppressed and killed. From the beginning agents such as Paul hunted down believers, while at the same time suppressing and censoring original teachings of Jesus. And what can be said of the Roman Church. How is it that Peter became a Pope of a fake institution. All religion is simply an artifice built to justify the sins of humans.
Betrayal is the operative word for what has occurred between the evils of Judaism and the evils of ‘Christianity’. I dare anyone to truly follow Jesus and his teachings. Then we will see a true revolution.
By failing to act, or even cry out against the Jewish pogram against Civilization and the White race, all Jews have become accessories to these crimes. Thus all Jews are guilty of capital offences and the very unpleasant retribution that our law calls for.
All Jews know about these things. Most approve, if only by their silence.
An a priori assumption informs Makow’s complaint; that is, the unelaborated axiom that the jews are a race. An argument cannot proceed logically when it’s premised on an attribution of objectivity to what amounts to nothing more than pre-emptive bias. Henry’s condemnation of Brother Nathanael as a “racist” is, therefore, by the principles of reasoning, a logical flaw; a spurious ad hominem, posited, without validity, as a moral contention.
Who says that jews are a race? I don’t and clearly, neither does Brother Nathanael Kapner. If you actually listen to the man, he never refers to himself as a jew. He talks of “being brought up a jew” and having a jewish childhood. He is a Christian now. This is the rub that Henry Makow, surprizingly, misses: Brother Nathanael’s ministry is not racially prejudiced against jews; rather, it is theologically prejudiced against judaism.
Mr. Makow sloppily compounds his error and seems to defy even his own wobbly logic, by bestowing the honorific, “The Good Jew” upon poor Brother Nathanael. As if being a monastic mendicant of orthodox persuasion wasn’t tough enough already.
Brother Nathanael, however, is mistaken in saying that jews have been expelled from 109 countries historically. This is an error that I see slovenly repeated, over and again, even by people, who are otherwise, well informed.
The true figure for the number of times that jews have been expelled from independent sovereign jurisdictions is 1,043. Yes, one thousand and forty three. For Jan Lamprecht’s comprehensive listing, see
https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12596
I’m with the good Brother. I thought his presentation was right on the mark, and I trust his point of view because he spent his entire childhood in the cult and gave it up for the light of Christ.
@andyay,
so very well put! spot on.
Not necessarily “good” but tolerable. There obviously are some tolerable Jews like for instance some people from the old school anti-war Left but generally speaking, i fully agree with Brother Nathanael, the only good Jew is the one who abandons and condemns the cult of Judaism and the cancerous mentality of the Jewry.
@andyay,
very well put, spot on.
Bobby Fischer is the only jew whose disdain for his people seemed organic. But brother Nathaniel is better than nothing.
The brother used the word corrupt because deep inside through years of observation that’s what the Jew is. Then the Jew refuses to look in the mirror to progress himself and would rather project that corrupt nature on to the width of society for gain.
Henry called this simple observation “racist” which is a typical Jew tactic to divert from truth gained through clear observation.
In his own comments section he has a go at a bloke saying in his way that you can judge an individual for being good or bad but you can’t judge a whole group for being good or bad. Yet he judges the “Nazi’s” evil as a group. He judges the bankers as a group of cabalist Jews.
Through my observation I know the brother’s truth about corruption and Henry’s child like way in refusing to gain further insight because of bias.
In this case it’s clearly Henry who is progressing the Jew agendas not the brother. The old good Jew bad Jew debate when in fact the Jew is just corrupt.
Unfortunately we got to share this planet with the Jew but be assured the only good Jew is one that moved to planet Mars hehe.
Call me racist I don’t care the Jew isn’t a race he is sect.
You are correct (@andyay), I gotta agree, but the most relevant number is the one not mentioned.
Much is said about the bible, the Jewish people, how it’s made up, how God doesn’t exist, but over and over, things are continuously proven to be true. Those who think they know are continuously
proven wrong, (for instance) there ARE some (pretty good) Jews. It is also very true that THEIR God threw them out of THEIR country (twice, I believe, according to THEIR scripture)…
But, as JC so well pointed out, only God is good.
Thank you, TeeJay but there are better posts than mine at this page.
*********
Identity and self-identifying are not the same thing. Who you are, isn’t a contention of dialectics and shouldn’t be allowed to be expropriated, for ideological gaming of the socially maladjusted.
We are, all of us, innately accomplished, unique and unitary expressions of blended maternal and paternal genes. We have integral chromosomatic identity, visibly manifest at birth as anatomically, baby boy or baby girl. Our endowment of skin-tone and eye colour, will range perceivably within grandparental parameters.
Further deterministic markers that bring definition to our sense of self, include; our given forenames and surnames; where we were born and into what worldly circumstances.
Identity, at its fundament, is inherited. Our successes or failures, may indeed proceed from the favourability of our upbringing and the fickle variables of fortune but our developmental journey, will always nuance our generationally signatured genetic index.
In a way, the torment of adolescence and the misadventures of early adulthood are evinced from both the recognition and the rejection of familial identity. You see that you are your parents and rebel at the existential injustice. This can lead to an attachment to ideology, in alienated youth, especially where it provisions a surrogate identity for the hormonally disaffected and promises them a post-revolutionary bliss.
The process of maturation begins, if it begins at all, with the shedding of personae, of ego-bound, identity constructs and it is pursuant upon the burgeoning personal capacity for critical self-assessment; for honest reflection of the influence, for better or worse, of your own words and your own deeds.
This recalibration of self can be seen, in essence, as an acceptance of both your hereditary propensities and also, of how genes give to mutability when charmed of melodious good will. You become the master over the expression of yourself.
From there, you may decide either to re-embrace your parental paradigm, like a prodigal son, or determine to become, by your acquired wisdoms, a new and improved family paradigm, instructed of that which was unknown to your forebears, as well as that which was.
When you engage in friendly conversation, who you are, oughtn’t ever excite provocation. Yet, during that morass of resentments, piquish over-sensitivity and petulant denials of adolescence, sharing such an intimacy, as what you had for supper, can easily precipitate the unoccasioned brawl.
It’s the ones who wantonly uglify themselves, with asymmetric hairdos, tattoo grafitto and more piercings than a cavalry soldier who’s crossed Apache territority, who are the hardcore disagreeables. They’re infamous for their assault tactic of full-on, screaming as loudly as they can, in a pitch so shrill it would sour vinegar, right in a well-intentioned stranger’s ear, causing the sudden, yet unsuspicious death, of some old geezer who thought that he was just chatting amicably with some scruffy young student-types.
Crisis-histrionics and vicariously felt torments do not the man or woman make. It’s their mum and dad that do.
Question for Hitler fans–why did Comintern instruct the Communists of Germany to vote for Hitler?
@ Lewis Jones
Answer: the Futures Market. Gaming the Exchange, dear fellow. The promise of a plentiful purse.
Don’t tell anyone else yet – but I hear that the prospects of bountiful return, on futures derivitives in Cruise Missile stock, is sky-rocketing. Bedlam’s brokerage.