Off Guardian – June 5, 2023
Yesterday, the Telegraph reported on “new research” which claims that lockdowns saved only 1700 lives in England and Wales. A “drop in the bucket” compared to the harms done:
The science of lockdowns is clear; the data are in: the deaths saved were a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs imposed.”
This is not a revelation, it’s not an admission, it’s not the system checks-and-balances working. Rather, it is public relations, perception management. Just one more example of the revisionism we highlighted in the most recent This Week in the New Normal.
It’s a campaign which pretends to accountability and honesty, but is really about carefully managing the covid autopsy. Ensuring any and all Covid conversation is had purely on the establishment’s terms, whilst lulling those freshly-awakened by the pandemic back into a sound sleep.
The “new research” is basically a re-statement of the fundamental lie masquerading as “confession”. It “admits” that lockdown had little to no impact on “covid deaths”, which is just a backdoor way of maintaining the fiction that “covid deaths” really happened.
It doesn’t question the efficacy of the tests, the definitions of “cases” or “deaths”, or any of the architecture of the Covid scam. It just reinforces the basic underlying assumptions:
Covid was indeed a thing, and it did kill people.
Both of which are proven lies.
The truth is lockdowns didn’t save any lives at all, and none of the “consequences” of lockdown were a surprise. We go into this in our “40 Facts” on Covid.
The poverty, the depression, despair. The shuttered stores and closed hospitals and bankrupt businesses. They were all predictable, and all deliberate.
They knew that’s what would happen…that’s what it was for.
That’s why “Covid” was invented.
Lockdown was not a policy mistake, it was a policy success.
—
Support Off Guardian
Maybe some day the truth that viruses are completely made up and the story is used to deflect attention away from what really makes you sick, breaks through the centuries of lies propagated by those who control and herd you?
I rather enjoyed the Lockdown. Did as I pleased, and a glimpse on how La Jolla probably used to be; empty streets and beaches, park anywhere you want, did as I pleased, cut the locks on the tennis courts, surfed alone (San Diego county was ‘illegal’ to surf, but 60 miles up the coast, it was ‘okay to surf’. You just couldn’t lie on the beach, as that, it seems, was ‘where covid congregated!’).
AND YET PEOPLE STILL DIDN’T GET IT.
‘A nation with a collective, room-temp IQ’
And I never put a mask on. Not once
That the lockdowns from the start were not necessary is not news. However, when the Off Guardian author quotes the line “Covid was indeed a thing, and it did kill people.”, and then says that both are proven lies, the evidence is that the lie is with the Off Guardian author.
Liars and even pragmatic ones, even seeming to be on the side of those exposing the abuses, are no help to exposing the actual truth or to any real cause for justice, and Off Guardian ought to know better or else be labeled as one more controlled-opposition site.
The indisputable evidence of the virus being real and actually being deliberately released to start the plandemic is now indisputable, and any lies or compromising in the matter regarding actual culpability, to try to get an independent or a just court will never prevent from the perpetrators of doing the same thing all over again or even releasing a more lethal one.
“Dr. ‘David Martin’ “FACT! ‘Covid-19’ Was Biological Warfare On The Human Race”
https://rumble.com/v2qm8ne-dr.-david-martin-fact-covid-19-was-biological-warfare-on-the-human-race.html
It is now indisputable that the perpetrators did release a real virus with the consent and the cooperation of all of our governments, which are no more than shills of the actual perpetrators.
The virus did kill a few million of the the vulnerable and it was a lab enhanced Coronavirus which had it not been engineered would have been no more lethal than a simple cold virus. The indisputable medical scientific evidence is that the Covid 19 virus (SARS-CoV-2) was deliberately engineered to be be a highly-infectious but low-lethality virus sufficient to produce distinct symptoms from other flu viruses, and dangerous enough to incite complications in the highly vulnerable cause some deaths, especially if proper treatment was denied to the victims. The virus was tested and decided to be a sufficient basis for the media hype in orchestrating a pandemic scare. To further enhance the hype and fear where the actual lethality of the virus was overestimated by the perpetrators, death numbers in 2020 were deliberately enhanced by various fraudulent and criminal methods, including:
– initially crowding the most frail and vulnerable in care homes together with those who were infected without any effort to isolate and protect them from the spread in their own facilities; [This practice was well beyond willful ignorance but it served to fuel the pandemic scare.]
– dictating ineffective and bogus treatment protocols to our heath-care facilities and agencies such as putting seriously stricken patients on respirators and administering useless and harmful drugs such as Fauci’s Remdesivir which in fact made the deaths of the victims even more horrific;
– suppressing the use of all known treatment protocols for Coronavirus flu symptoms which included the use of HCQ, Chloroquine, and even the use of the antibiotic Azithromycin in many cases for the frail who clearly developed pneumonia (the actual cause of most of the deaths); [By the end of August 2020 our governments and health-care agencies in lockstep were also suppressing the use of Ivermectin which by then had been proven in over 40 peer-reviewed medical-scientific articles was even more effective than the HCQ and Chloroquine protocols used for the seriously ill. To make matters even more diabolical all, any of the HCQ, Chloroquine and Ivermectin protocols could easily have been administered to the most frail and venerable as prophylactics to make them “safe” such that there could have been no call for any vaccines.]
– deliberately exaggerating Covid death numbers in various jurisdictions with monetary incentives and with threats for hospitals and health-care faculties to call anyone who “may” have been infected with the virus who died to be a “Covid death”; [The greatest exaggeration of Covid death numbers which were used to sustain the fear and the demand for Stage 2 of the pandemic, which was the mandated, lockstep Covid vaccines programs, came from the UK, the US, France, Spain, Italy, and Brazil – all of which nations whose economies are central to the infrastructure of the international banking cartel.]
– deliberately exaggerating Covid “case numbers” through the misuse of PCR testing when they knew that running any PCR test over 25 cycles would yield mostly false positive results; [The PCR false positive results were useful in enhancing the lie that far more people actually died “of” or “with” Covid than actually did.]
In order to enforce their planned vaccine programs they had to sustain the scare, and as the evidence continues to unfold, the mRNA spike-protein producing vaccines had been developed in conjunction with the development of the actual virus years before the virus was actually released, and was known to be ineffective to suppress its spread or to even reduce any serious symptoms, which serious symptoms were usually that of the frail developing pneumonia who ought to have been treated with the known and effective treatment protocols mentioned above. Before releasing the various vaccine brands they knew exactly how harmful the mRNA component would generally be. However, in their sophistication the perpetrators used the vaccine recipients as human Guiney pigs, and they have been tracking the recipients of the various vaccine batches which contained various harmful substances. right now there is a sort of death watch going on. The vaccine recipients in the public were denied the right to know what actual substances were in the vaccines they were being given much less any of the actual risks. People in elite classes in most jurisdictions were exempt from being vaccinated. This evidence is now also indisputable.
The courts in any case are always a crapshoot and with anything really big usually like this, it is bound to be a very fixed crapshoot. You will find lawyers not only dropping things despite the evidence in such courts in order to get just a hearing, but also making compromises to say even such things as there was no virus, that it was all media hype, that everyone was mainly misled mainly by the panic, even our government officials, politicians, and the entire justice system, and after having done that there they will be open to the big payoffs in damages for the alleged “negligence”.
It was while passing a bus-stop that I first saw that ridiculous poster of the NHS’s own Nurse Ratched glaring out from under a space-suit visor..☺
Thinking it must be some sort of parody or prank, I couldn’t contain myself… and burst out laughing …only to be stared at by two THICK Btits, waiting (6ft apart!) in the bus shelter, with daggers in their eyes just peeking above their industrial-strength masks… the sight of which only added to my merriment… as I staggered, almost doubled up, down a dark alleyway towards the back door of my “officially closed” watering hole.
😅😂🤣
Not bad! Saving 1700 from a disease that doesn’t exist……
Lockdown is a prison term. They just told you that you are in a prison. Try to figure it out,,,
‘C’ VOID
@ ShireWatch
“The indisputable evidence of the virus being real and actually being deliberately released to start the plandemic is now indisputable”
“It is now indisputable that the perpetrators did release a real virus”
“The indisputable medical scientific evidence is that the Covid-19 virus (Sars-Cov-2) was deliberately engineered”
You’re very confident in your assertions, so much so, in fact, that you feel the need to reiterate fourfold that the existence of Sars-Cov-2 is “indisputable,” as if emphatically repeating the same sentiment suffices as proof. It doesn’t, unfortunately. Even Dr. David Martin, in the video you link, references prominent doctors in his footnotes, who deny that there was ever a Sars-Cov-2 virus. Martin doesn’t critique their position. He includes the eminent naysayers because he recognizes that their claims may prove to have validity and shouldn’t, therefore, be petulantly disregarded. So, Dr. Martin isn’t as sure as you are of indisputable truths.
The existence of Sars-Cov-2 is eminently disputable. Antoine Bechamps was challenging germ theory as early as the 1860’s.
The given symptoms of Covid-19 differed not one iota from the clinical symptoms of Influenza. In an independent autopsy of 1500 bodies in the US, where the cause of death had been given as Covid-19, it was discovered that all 1500 departed died of Influenzas type A or B.
This effort involved seven different universities, including Stanford and Cornell. The results were much too dangerous to the integrity of the official narrative and the findings were quickly relegated to the realm of “fake news” and caused to disappear. Yet, where have annual flu fatalities gone?
In 2019, there were 38 million victims of the flu in the US. In 2020, there were just 1,822. A miracle!
Over fifty governments worldwide, have now admitted, in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, that they possess no evidence whatsoever of a physical virus; that it has never been isolated in a laboratory and that the science proceeds from computer modelling algorithms.
Therefore, I can’t really see how denying the authenticity of Sars-Cov-2, provides the conspirators with any kind of get-out-clause to evade prosecution. In a sense, whether there is no virus or if only a computer generated model of the virus exists, isn’t telling to the crimes they’ve committed. I don’t think that the absence of a virus would mitigate favourably in a fraud prosecution, for example. It would have no bearing on greater charges of homicide or even genocide because the players were fully conversant with the controversy of the validity of the scientific evidence, as FOIA answers have documented.
Your confidence in the “indisputable” reality of Sars-Cov-2 is misgiven. It’s a bit haughty to make such definitive claims anyway, especially while the actuality of the virus is, quite obviously, in disputation.