Leo Hohmann – leohohmann.com May 14, 2023
Victoria, Australia, is set to become the third state in the land down-under to rollout digital drivers’ licenses stored on citizens’ smartphones.
Citizens of Victoria can expect to obtain a new digital ID by next year, though a six-month pilot program will be launched in July in the city of Ballarat.
The new ID will provide three options: display all of one’s credentials and a unique barcode that can be scanned by law enforcement; conceal the important data and only reveal your name and date of birth; or a third selection that displays only the user’s date of birth.
Each option displays a new QR code every 90 seconds as a precaution against hackers..
Government Services Minister Danny Pearson made a complete fool out of himself at a press conference last week announcing the news.
Like a clown selling snake oil at a carnival, Pearson said:
“This is just such a glorious day and, I can’t wait, I just can’t wait. I gotta say, you’re gonna love it. It’s just going to be woo! It’s so good, it’s so good, it’s so exciting!”
Another citizen, clearly chosen for the propaganda show masquerading as a press conference, spoke about how she feels this will make her life so much easier, and convenient.
“It’s going to make life a whole lot easier,” she beamed, adding she and her friends are all “thrilled.”
Watch below how the local 9 News presents this as a wonderful, exciting advancement for the citizens of Victoria, who they hope will be gullible enough to swallow it whole.
—
Who would have ever thought that selling digital slavery would be so easy?
Oh boy, we get to be tagged and tracked with a digital QR Code! Yippee!
Oh and it’s not just more convenient. It’s “safer” too.
In an interview with the news station, Pearson claimed that this digital identifier is “much safer” than the physical, tangible IDs “that we know have had its issues in the past.”
I reported last month that a bill has been introduced in Congress that would create a digital ID for all Americans. As has been done in every other country that moves to digital IDs, the U.S. politicians who introduced Senate Bill 884 in the U.S. Senate, Senators Kyrsten Synema of Arizona and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, claim these digital tracking devices will make your life safer, more secure and more convenient.
Australia’s 9 News reported this digital ID is “not meant to replace the physical ones,” and if you believe that you really are dumb. Pearson himself, probably without realizing it, admitted that’s exactly what they’re meant to do, is replace the old physical IDs.
“We want Victorians to have the flexibility to leave their wallet or purse at home, have everything on their phone,” he said.
According to The Winepress News, New South Wales and South Australia have already had digital drivers’ licenses since 2019.
However, in March NSW officials announced a new all-in-one digital app that will totally replace physical documents, allowing for the storing of banking records, health records, etc., with access to the app requiring users to provide their faces to be scanned by facial recognition software.
As I reported in a seminal article last week, the globalists are moving things fast toward the Great Reset’s promise of an all-digital society where everything will be tagged and tracked, all human movement, all purchases both online and in stores, all vaccine injections and healthcare, everything. And the ultimate purpose of this is so government and corporations can track your carbon footprint and punish you for going beyond your allotted purchases of meat, fossil fuels like gasoline and natural gas, etc. Politicians will sell digital IDs and digital money as the answer to all of the problems currently plaguing the world, both real and manufactured, such as climate change, border security, election integrity and rising violent crime.
It never fails: Safety, security, convenience. Those are the three watch words used to make people clamor for their own enslavement.
—
LeoHohmann.com is 100 percent reader supported and does not rely on any corporate ads or sponsorships. If you would like to help keep my work going, please consider a donation of any size, which may be sent c/o Leo Hohmann, P.O. Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or via credit card below.
01000001 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01101100 01100100 00100000 01100111 01101111 01101110 01100101 00100000 01100100 01101001 01100111 01101001 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01101001 01101110 01110011 01100001 01101110 01100101 00001010
Q:
What if citizens refuse to buy, own, or even be given a smartphone?
I was able to do it for years. My work iphone stayed at work. Nothing but old time landline otherwise. At the moment, — Same thing, you bet.
Are they going to force it? What if we plead ignorance and ineptitude? What if we keep dropping it in mud puddles?
Hey, sabot — sabotage. Now is the time.
I think they chose Australia and Canada because they’re large and sparsely populated, Holland because it’s small and densely populated and New Zealand because it’s isolated. Each offers its own advantages for trial and response.
Large and sparsely populated means the populations would have to cover large distances to protest and put up resistance, which became almost impossible during the lockdowns, and which can be imposed again even if illegal under present laws. Then the police can arrest anybody on the move, while their own travel isn’t limited because they can cross the country on military planes.
Small and densely populated places means that while people don’t need to move far to protest and resist, the police and security forces can quickly move large numbers to where they’re needed, including from nearby countries. Again normal laws won’t apply because it’s a dictatorship imposing its new order.
The isolation of New Zealand means there’s no way to escape–ie. migration under political persecution–and no outside assistance will be coming. It also allows the study of what a modern isolated population will do under duress, from innovation to resist at one extreme and meek acceptance at the other.
These locations present opportunities for study and fine-tuning the laws and responses, while most other inhabited places fall somewhere between these categories. Somewhere like Africa where people can move around the bush, jungle or savannah, they can introduce famine and employ local guards who will kill their own kind for a small but steady wage.
The only salvation will come from ourselves. This is a plan for genocide in the billions.
The requirement for an individual to carry a smart phone – or have some skin implant – seems like another brick TPTB are putting on top of their Tower of Babel.
I own a smartphone that I use only very occasionally and for my own use. Apart from the surveillance aspect, I use my own precautionary principle WRT to Wi-Fi. When I called my internet provider to ask how to deactivate my Wi-Fi – I am hard wired – I gave the technician a tongue lashing after he asked me why I wanted it to do. He told me that it couldn’t harm me. How would he know?
For what it’s worth when I temporally activate Wi-Fi for a Kindle download I often sense a little pressure at the front of my head. This is purely anecdotal and may yet be my own imagining, but I’m just putting it out there in case others experience, or “imagine” they experience this.
And on the safety aspect, I do wonder whether EMF radiation and the graphene are co-factors in reactions we have seen.
With regard to the surveillance aspect of digital IDs, inclusive of CDBCs, I do wonder as to whether physical money can actually be got rid of. Even though the amount we use has declined we still have it. By analogy, we have all sorts of modes of transport these days but we don’t catch a train to the corner shop or fly to the bathroom.
How many people wishing to spend 20p at a transport facility toilet by the swishing of bar code against a bog door really want to tell the central bank they are having a crap at such and such a place and time.
Their whole Tower of Babel plans are predicated on: they knowing what’s best, they will do it regardless like a series of chess moves that do not take into account the opponent’s moves, the masses are sheep, and most importantly in acting solely without genuine consent, they are acting untruthfully. Anything untruthful is unsustainable. Anything untruthful is ungodly and cannot last.