HenryMakow.com – April 23, 2023
“The malodorous “atom-bomb gas” that was perceived by many during and after the bombings was none other than mustard gas.”
This begs the question – Are nuclear bombs another hoax?
What’s in those missile silos? Bales of hay?
(Disclaimer- I still believe the official narrative but would not be shocked if Dr. Palmer is right. He is an MD and chemistry professor at the Unniversity of Waterloo fired for refusing the gene therapy.)
by Michael Palmer, MD – (henrymakow.com)
International Red Cross Hiroshima case report. Click to enlarge
In previous posts here on Henry’s website [1,2] and elsewhere [3,4], I have argued that no atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, there are numerous reports of radiation sickness from both cities. A recent post here [5] presented some of the eyewitness testimony suggesting that the “radiation sickness” was caused not by radiation but rather by mustard gas. Here, we will look at some of the objective evidence—as well as some further relevant eyewitness testimony—that supports the use of mustard gas in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
1. Acute lung damage and respiratory distress
While mustard gas has radiation-like effects on the bone marrow, the hair follicles, and other sensitive tissues, there nevertheless are telling differences between the two. Inhalation of mustard gas will cause acute and severe lung damage. In contrast, in those exposed to rapidly fatal radiation doses, it is the brain, not the lung, which shuts down first [6, p. 218]:
“In a nuclear criticality accident at Los Alamos in 1958, one worker received a total body dose … between 39 and 49 Gray. … This person went into a state of shock immediately and was unconscious within a few minutes … The patient died 35 hours after the accident.”
In contrast, many early victims at Hiroshima and Nagasaki suffered the most intense respiratory distress. An eyewitness from Hiroshima, Mr. Hashimoto, recounts from the day of the bombing [7]:
“Atom Bomb Gas” was what the people in Hiroshima called it. When they trusted their own senses and tried to help each other. This changed only AFTER their own leaders and then the Occupation army told them otherwise.
The three signs Hudson mentions as happening quickly at Hiroshima is happening slowly in other parts of the world. There is suspicion that “chemtrails” do not come from any complicated recipe. The stuff is no more complicated that chlorine gas. Especially lung conditions and skin lesions are now showing up all over the world. It’s SLOW ACTING on purpose.
So what they did then they are doing now… to ALL of us.
Well nuclear power stations are not a “hoax”..
I think we’ll soon find out whether nuclear bombs exist or not.
The real significance of the nuke hoax is that the fiction of nation states engaged in such performances as the “Cold War” show that we have been under a sort of one world governance since international banking got started. A recent reading of the conviviality between the bankers of the Third Reich and the Allies during WWII under the auspices of The Bank For International Settlements, BIS, corroborated this for me recently.
Scrutiny of the banking links is akin to Truman noticing the falling of artificial lightening from the dome he lived in. People don’t look at banking because it is “boring”. They get side-tracked into the minutia of tank strategy at the battle of Kursk and so on. Big explosions are great for distraction and theatre, but it is the raised highbrow of the banker to the civil servant over afternoon tea where all the real action takes place.
To give one example relating to the cold war : Victor Rothschild as the illusive “fifth man” bestrode the worlds of banking and spying/intelligence. One of his proteges in the “Cambridge Five” – a useful idiot and a proto Extinction Rebellion type — Donald Maclean — “gave nuclear inventory” to the Soviet Union. This was all a sophisticated psyop that not only took in some middleclass Oxbridge twits, but also created advertising for one of the biggest hoaxes of all time. Among many questionable occurrences, a couple of the “Cambridge Five” escaped across the channel to France en route to the Soviet Union because “MI5 didn’t work on weekends…”
This means that heads of states have also been duped idiots or initiates in this world deception. The consequences of this deception also highlight the sabre rattling in the present “conflict” as a continuing theatrical performance, albeit with dire consequences for those caught up in the meat grinder of war.
The hoax throws up some comical claims. One is the that India and Pakistan realising the whole poker game involves hands with busted flushes claimed — no doubt for domestic purposes — that they detonated nuclear weapons close together in time. This was of the order of fifty or so years ago. South Africa “had the bomb” but then “lost the technology”. Then there is the 9/11 plotter Israel, who have carefully woven a narrative of a man with his hand held behind his back claiming very loudly, “he has nothing” – and indeed, he “has nothing”, lest of all a “Samson Option”…
That the atomic bombs were just one more big, fat lie – like virtually everything else we have been told about the second world war would not surprise me. If true, it suggests that even the anti-human megalomaniacs, that run this world realise that this would be a step too far – it might come back and bite them!
The nuclear bomb project was a money making scam, a hoax that drained the treasury of billions. Those fotos you see of shroom clouds are phony. Fake. There are no atom bombs, and no one on earth possesses them. State terrorism on people and their pets. Of course those employed in the “atom bomb” did try, but only resulted in cancer deaths in wyoming and Washington, where they bury the s#&t. But mustard gas and a few other deadly gases are real, used in industry, easy to make, and always used to reduce the civilian population, who are the primary targets.
I did some research on nukes a couple of years ago and I concluded that nuclear bombs are not real . I am 70 and spent years of my life terrified of a nuclear war but now I feel differently because for me there are no ICBM`s etc.
In the UK most of those with smart phones got a “practise” emergency warning but why would they need to practise sending out a signal? Also, because they couldn’t do anything for us in real-life if it’s a nuclear strike it’s possible they won’t send any messages. So it seems to me just another mechanism to push fear.
This paper nails the case closed.
.
“The malodorous ‘atom-bomb gas’ that was perceived by many during and after the bombings was none other than mustard gas.”
Or so Dr. Palmer mindlessly speculates.
“This begs the question – Are nuclear bombs another hoax?”
No it doesn’t; it merely reflects ignorance and/or a lack of critical thinking skills.
As we get closer and closer to nuclear war, this no-such-things-as-nukes nonsense pops up yet again. Funny that. Here’s the unfortunate reality: Nuclear weapons exist. They were used against Japan.
First, there would be no reason for the U.S. “government” to drop “mustard gas” on Japan and then try to claim that it was actually an atomic bomb. Second, the “malodorous ‘atom-bomb gas'” was most likely nitrogen dioxide produced by the intense heat of the fireball.
This (nonsense) is the result of: First bomb designs were overly complex. And the bombs were overrated. It was magical thinking. Now we know:
Getting the materials is the only hard part. Nukes are simple and they are routine!t used these days.
“William Beeby” said: “I did some research on nukes a couple of years ago and I concluded that nuclear bombs are not real . I am 70 and spent years of my life terrified of a nuclear war but now I feel differently because for me there are no ICBM`s (sic) etc.”
Well guess what, you are wrong. On the contrary, NUCLEAR WEAPONS DO EXIST. And the “malodorous ‘atom-bomb gas'” mentioned by Palmer is not “mustard gas” but nitrogen dioxide, formed by the heat of the enormous fireball which causes atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen to chemically combine. But if it makes you feel better, why not just go ahead and pretend that they don’t exist? (Your time would be much better spent researching other things, e.g. the proper use of the apostrophe.
If nuclear weapons were/are a hoax, then there would have been no reason for the Allies to destroy the Nazi controlled heavy water plant in Norway during WWII.
Note that nuclear isotopes produce heat and any kind of heat can generate power. A power plant is not a bomb. Think of uranium as wood or coal.
Bombs are an entirely different matter. Nakatani’s “Death Object” is available at locations online (the US Amazon has now removed it from sale; I don’t know about the other amazons.) Nakatani’s point, put in other words, is that it’s like slapping lots of lumber together and expecting them to generate enough heat in a pile to blow up. Won’t happen. Wood CAN supply heat but not like that.
Same with uranium, etc. They can and do supply energy and a big enough accident will also cause problems. But wood fire is problematic too. A forest fire is terrifying to be in, speaking from experience. Still we use wood for lots of heating situations and it’s usually safe.
Nakatani is a physicist and his point is the SPECIFIC science as to why isotopes, no matter how enriched, CANNOT explode is impossible but also CLASSIFIED by any nation that has the bomb. He walks you through as much of the tech stuff as possible without violating the secret statutes, but you really do have to think on your own a bit. He’s an educator but has no intention of going to prison.
The modern era is full of Big Lies. Nukes, anyway, are not even the biggest.
They used Hundreds of tons of TNT to create the mushroom cloud, they also used fuel air Bombs for effect. Both cities had very flimsy buildings so could easily be raised to the ground. It was all Theater for the Masses.
“Franz” said: “Note that nuclear isotopes produce heat and any kind of heat can generate power. A power plant is not a bomb. Think of uranium as wood or coal.”
Poor analogy. Wood and coal produce heat by the release of chemical energy when they burn in an oxidizing atmosphere. Heat from uranium is E=MC^2 energy from nuclear fission. If the uranium is sufficiently enriched in U235 you can make a bomb out of it. Stop telling lies.
@Franz
I quoted Nakatani’s extensively in my own book. Chapter Seven I called “Science Fiction And Nuclear Physics” with sections:
“The Fashioning Of Scientific Perception By Popular Culture”
“The Zionist Poster Boy Albert Einstein”
“The Putative Physics Of The Atom Bomb” (where I reference Nakatani)
“Galen Winsor Pulls Back The Radioactive Curtain”
But books can be a major stumbling block for those wanting soundbites. The older nay sayers in TTS community are likely never to be persuaded by argument on the nuke issue. But I’m sure there will be younger and intelligent readers whose minds will be more flexible than the naysayer’s creaking knee joints…
New ideas only take over when the older folks holding discredited notions die off.
I am 100% certain that nuclear bombs do not exist.
There’s no way it would be a thriving city today, you have any idea of the half life of those isotopes people? Sure you can say the wind drifted it away, but a huge amount woulda been local in the soil, on everything.
Theres a few people who massed a lot of data, who think it is a hoax.
Radiation certainly exists, but one big thing, first military people on the scene in Hiroshima said the damage looked exactly like fire-bombings – Dresden-like.
There is this concerted effort to attack main stream science with conspiracy theories like flat earth and no nukes. Both of those are ridiculous – which taints real conspiracy research – which is why those theories are all over the internet.
The government is at war with those who tell the truth. So they have this CIA Jew Cass Sunstein come up with different programs to discredit truthers – by having fake truthers attack real truthers with ridiculous theories like flat earth and nukes are not real.
They also put up “fact checkers” all over the internet to attack any theory that goes against the main stream narratives.
Another thing they do is push a narrative, like climate change, then have fake scientists come on an prove that global warming is real – yet they never bring on any real climate scientist.
Makow loses all credibility by putting up this nonsense. So if nukes are not real, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chemical bombs, then why did the Japanese surrender?
“…So if nukes are not real, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chemical bombs, then why did the Japanese surrender?”
Because it allowed the Japenese to surrender to the Americans rather than the Russians and not lose face.
From my book “Fake Aliens And The Phony Nuke World Order”
CHAPTER SIX – FROM BERLIN TO MANHATTAN TO NAGASAKI
‘The former question we discuss later. For now, we look at the latter. In “Five Myths About Nuclear Weapons”, Ward Wilson, while accepting the actuality of nuclear weapons looks at the destruction of cities, ancient and modern, as a war ending strategy or otherwise. He scrutinises the timeline from Hiroshima to Nagasaki. Wilson can be seen here delivering his point of view:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBX5vo1KBiw
Wilson observes that during the war the intensive bombing of civilian targets didn’t diminish the resolve of those afflicted. I observe, borrowing from Orwell and others that war is more of a control mechanism inflicted by government on its own people as much as anything. German and Japanese civilian causalities were incredible.
I also wonder whether the allied powers had one eye on the reconstruction and lucrative contracts that would be available after the war ended. By the same token, as we shall see later, many joint owned German-American factories were miraculously spared during the WWII bombing campaigns.
Wilson notes that in the history of the world cities were rarely levelled. We learn for instance that Lincoln was not impressed by the destruction of Atlanta or the capture of Richmond in the Confederacy. He wanted Lee’s army defeated in the field. Genghis Khan only achieved final victory against the Khwarazmian dynasty after its last army had been defeated; this despite the levelling of several cities. In the modern era Wilson also notes the bombing of Hanoi did little to alter the course of the Vietnam.
He states:
“The lesson of war is incontrovertible. The destruction of cities doesn’t win wars.”
Let’s return to August 1945. The Japanese were in a dire position. The Americans were advancing and levelling their cities. The Japanese hoped to deliver a heavy blow against the allies and somehow see their way to a Soviet mediated truce. Japan’s ongoing strategy required its powerful neighbour to the west remain neutral. Let’s examine the timeline:
August 6th 1945 8.15 am – Little Boy is dropped on Hiroshima
8.30am – Reports are sent to Tokyo
August 7th – President Truman issues press release about new weapon.
August 9th – Just after midnight on the 8th The Soviets invade Manchuria and Japan is face with a two-front war it can’t possibly win.
4.30 am – The word reaches Tokyo of Soviet aggression
10.30 am – The Japanese made aware of this convene their supreme council
11.02 am – Fat Man purportedly detonates over Nagasaki
Ward Wilson observes the council doesn’t meet after Hiroshima, and for that matter scarcely discuss civilian causalities during the fire-bombing of their cities.
It is actually moved to meet and discuss after the Soviet Union enters the war. Wilson argues that Nagasaki is therefore not the reason for a subsequent Japanese surrender but a pretext – a way for the Japanese leadership to save face.
According to the emperor the atom bomb was:
“An amazing breakthrough that no one expected.”
The Japanese chief cabinet secretary Sakomizu Hisatune stated:
“In ending the war, the idea of was to put the responsibility for defeat on the atomic bomb alone, and not on the military. This was a clever pretext.”
The Japanese lord privy seal Kido Koichi stated:
“If military leaders could convince themselves that they were defeated by the power of science, but not by lack of spiritual power or strategic errors, they could save face to some extent.”
The Rushmore Denooyer PBS documentary for its own part expresses a self-congratulatory message that Americans felt about the scientific achievement of the new nuclear weapon. American ingenuity was the reason for the sudden end of the war.
The detonation or non-detonation of atom bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki suited both the American and Japanese policy makers. They shared a common desire for Japan not to be occupied by the Red Army.’
***
I published this book nearly five years ago. It has valuable information from many authors. Many of whom such as the author cited, who actuality believed in nukes. If I was a YouTube personality I would be part of the back slapping echo chamber of alternative voices. Sales have grown steadily, and I thank Rixon Stewart for allowing me to plug it, but you know, just as someone who has researched a topic, and read countless books, I’m frustrated by the seeming allergy to anything but the most readily digested media by people who express opinions on this matter.
I have a full bookshelf of books with pencil notes and half a dozen A4 books full of notes on video materials. The some guy come along and says something like “if the Germans didn’t have the A – bombs why did the allies bomb a heavy water plant in Scandinavia”. He sees something in a TV documentary or a mainstream article and believes it can trump the work of a man who has had first-hand experience of politics, a maths and physics degree, and who has spent over two years full time writing the book after reading so much material.
Correction: NOT “a full bookshelf”; “HALF a bookcase of four shelves”…
Omg… this is going way too far into the irrational. _Nukes_ _are_ _not_ _a_ _hoax_. Hard to believe how ignorant some people are!