HenryMakow.com — Feb 17, 2023
Secret “Manhattan Project” protocol from May 1945: plutonium bomb several years away.
Scientific leaders of the Manhattan Project. Left to right: Ernest O. Lawrence, Arthur H. Compton, Vannevar Bush, James B. Conant, Karl T. Compton, and Alfred L. Loomis. Click to enlarge
“Compton’s words still imply that two more years must pass before the first plutonium bomb can be assembled. Thus, the inference is unavoidable that a plutonium bomb could not possibly have been ready a mere six weeks later for the fabled test at Alamogordo, or for the bombing of Nagasaki three weeks after that–or even for the “Able” and “Baker” alleged nuclear bomb tests at the Bikini Atoll in 1946.“
Michael Palmer was fired from his post as a Chemistry professor at a Canadian university for refusing to be “vaccinated.”
by Michael Palmer, MD — (henrymakow.com)
According to the history books, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were each destroyed by a single atomic bomb. The Hiroshima bomb contained uranium, and the Nagasaki bomb contained plutonium. A plutonium bomb is also said to have been detonated in the famous “Trinity” test explosion at Alamogordo in New Mexico on July 16, 1945.
Others and I have argued that these bombings were not atomic. While many of the arguments against the atomic nature of the bombings are rather technical, there is at least one clear and simple piece of evidence among US government declassified files.
In this document, none other than physics Nobel laureate Arthur Compton, who oversaw the Manhattan Project’s entire physics research, stated on the record that shortly before the alleged atomic bombings, plutonium had not yet been purified, and that it would become available “in volume” only about three years later. Compton’s statements contradict the official story of the alleged plutonium bombs at Alamogordo and at Nagasaki.
The story of how the “atomic age” began at Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been drummed into our heads so persistently that many readers will outright reject the notion that these atomic bombs were faked. Nevertheless, there is abundant evidence of the fakery [1–3].
wow this is the biggest exposure story since the moon landings and the holocaust nonsnse
All known for many years.
Even Joseph Farrell in his Reich books noted that as of January, 1945 there was not enough fissile material in the whole USA to build even ONE bomb.
After hitting up Canada for uranium (“the bomb” was a Brit-Canadian project that was shunted to the US because our deserts were even emptier then than they are now) they were still VERY FAR from what the equation said was needed for even ONE great “chain reaction”. But in 1945 there were 3?
In fact it never worked, and I think the leaders of the 3 nations working on the Atom Bomb knew it was phony from the start.
Every day, Biden or Putin or others say “We’re going to use nukes! Be afraid!”
The hell with them. They are hiding empty bomb casings and the biggest lie in history.
Nukes are a part of the scenario that holds together the fictions of the old cold war and the current theatre – yes “theatre” – war in Ukraine. “Theatre” war was first seen in Korea when the excuse for not using nukes was that the mountainous terrain would obviate their effectiveness.
When Truman saw lights falling to the ground outside his “home”, it was the first of many clues that his world was not what he thought.
For those waking up and seeing that global governance of the banker sort has been in play for a long time, welcome to reality.
Other artifacts of a Truman-like world:
1/ Russia and the West both lie about the “Holocaust” and Jewish supremacism.
2/ Russia and the West both lie about the scamdemic and vaxtermination.
3/ Russia and the West both lie about many aspects of space exploration.
4/ Russia and the West both lie about the world banking system.
5/ Russia and the West both lie about the old Cold War and support each others “spy accounts”.
6/ Russia and the West and MANY OTHERS lie about nukes…
Relating to 6/, other improbabilities include but are not limited to:
I) India and Pakistan “developing nukes” in quick succession.
ii) South Africa gaining and then LOSING the “technology”.
The scamdemic and nuke hoax are very similar. They trade on a fear of externalities while seeking to mold a nation’s people.
Once again: Manhattan Project was exclusively about so-called fuel bombs, there was no nuclear expertise at Los Alamos, Oppenheimer was clueless about radioacticity etc. German A-Bombs were secured by Gen.Patton in Thuringia, one was tested in “Trinity” experiment, not knowing that these bombs had to be dropped by plane for explosion in a height of 600 m to develop best destructive effects on the ground level, therefor ignition was performed by a baro-sensor. Attack on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, ignoring more than half a dozen peace offers by Japan, werecondcuted with the remaining last two German uranium based bombs!
Read “The great bluff” by German Author Peter Brüchmann, hisfather was was a high level officer in the 3rd Reich involved in the financing the german atomic bomb programm! Don´t walk into the trap, A-bombs have existed and do exist, and we are standing at the brink of a nuclear WW3!
Interview with the same author on the same topic. Highly recommended.
https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/Michael-Palmer:6
Yet more boring fake news, when the Germans led by MI6 asset Adolf Hitler, already had nukes, but didn’t use them. Maybe the US attempt to build their own, was delayed, but why would that stop them when they had German nukes?
Russia detonated its first nuke in 1949, which would be about right, if they didn’t start with German made nukes. The US tested its first nuke in July 1945, and used nukes on Japan one month later.
Germany surrendered in May 1945, but no doubt all the brains and bombs were in US hands before then.
Someone writes a document, and its accurate by any definition. The F35 was pressed into service, but it was no where near ready for combat, and still isn’t to this day, but someone signed it off.
Why is a truther rewriting history?
Makov won’t get to the bottom of it. Britain and Germany are the pioneers, and Manhattan doesn’t come into it. Maybe German bombs were used on Nagasaki and Hiroshima and I heard the technology was here long before 1945. Since it is one of the most “classified” topics I do not dig far for the truth; I can only collate what info is at the surface
Hundreds and tons of TNT were used in the two cities in Japan and fual air bombs for effect.
It is hard to understand why Mr. Palmer has written such a misleading article.
If one follows the Wayback link provided in the full article on Makow’s website, and actually reads the linked report, it is obvious that in Palmer’s key quote, Dr. Compton was discussing the capacity to provide large quantities of enriched uranium and plutonium as part of an ongoing program to exploit atomic energy. In the report Dr. Compton explicitly says that “Production of enriched materials was now on the order of pounds or hundreds of pounds and it was contemplated that the scale of production could be expanded sufficiently to produce many tons.”
Obviously some bomb production material was available.
On page 13 concern was expressed that the impact of a single atomic bomb would not be much different from “the effect caused by any Air Corps strike of present dimensions.” Dr. Oppenheimer pointed out that “the visual effect of an atomic bombing would be tremendous.”
On page 14 participants discuss the desirability of using several atomic bombs at once on Japan. General Groves expressed three concerns: losing the chance to study and learn from each bomb, risk of failure due to rushing the production process, and having the multiple atomic strikes look too much like other mass bombings that were already being carried out.
It should be obvious from these discussions that an atomic bomb was available for use.
This article completely ignores the obvious facts actually presented in the report from which its “smoking gun” quote was extracted without context. Read it and decide for yourself. (https://web.archive.org/web/20220503184915/https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/3913480/Notes-of-the-Interim-Committee-Meeting-Thursday.pdf)
As usually Makow is telling fairytales again:
“No atomic (nuclear) bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki
in 1945”
but he forgets to explain and write what sort
of bombs was it then ??
Compare to Dresden bombing (same year) in 1945 where about
200 Thousand people where burned to death in 2 days
with with aprox. 2000 bombs (plus/minus).
WikiPedia :
In four raids between 13 and 15 February 1945, 772 heavy bombers of the Royal Air Force (RAF) and 527 of the United States Army …
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II)
Not a bit of this in Hiroshima / Nagasaki.
So it needed over 1’200 havy bombers to do that in 2 days.
There where survivors in Hiroshima / Nagasaki who died weaks or
months later, but they never told of having seen an armada of
bomber planes. Nor did one find the metal remains of the hundreds
of bombs….
In April 1986 an atomic / nuclear disaster happened in Chernobyl.
Aprox. 100 people died within days and over the years hundreds more
died of the following cancer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_due_to_the_Chernobyl_disaster
Do not forget that Wikipedia is a jewish initiated and cotrolled project
with headquarter in Silicon Valley/California.
By that it has stopped all of the printed, very valuable encyclopedias,
with pics and valuable information, partly 8-12 books from A to Z.
They have been realeased and updated for many, many decades,
particularly in Germany and other countries.
Very rare to be able to buy them antiquarian and very expensive.
And to catch you Makow asks you to press “Continues” and
anounce yourself with a Gmail email….
Look at the pic at the beginning of above article.
The woman are not burned, not a bit, but clearly having
problems with heat, polluted air and breathing.
If nuclear bombs exist, why haven’t these been used during the almost eight decades since their alleged first use? Methinks there have been enough opportunities, and given the fact that most politicians in high office are psychopaths, this is even more puzzling. Actually, that seems to prove those bombs do not exist.
I dare say that whether it’s a nuke OR a 1000lb tnt bomb that falls on your head… this discussion will be purely academic.. at least to you!
😅😂🤣
Even more convincing:
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/bikini.pdf
Can anyone here poke holes in either of those papers?
.
Another moronic article to be filed under the “Nessy the Monster marries fellow Lochness fish”, “Big Foot well and alive”, and “Elvis and JFK both faked their deaths” folders. Did I forget anything? Oh, of course, … Flat Erf!
There’s no doubt that some events are staged or false-flagged, and much of what passes for modern physics is bogus. It does not follow that **everything** is. This is a pivotal and faulty cognitive leap that many who consider themselves “awake” devastatingly make. It comes down to a serious lack of rigorous formal logic training; a poverty of critical thinking. “ ‘they’ are lying about 9/11, and it follows that the erf is flat, and that Big Foot, the Chupacabra and Nessy are running the secret world government from Lochness!” No. It does definitely NOT follow. Not at all. Yes, 9/11 was a brazen false-flag, and no there is no flat erf or Nessy, nor does one claim logically follow from the other.
This brings us to the nuclear weapons. Many power plants still run on nuclear fuels. Anyone with a basic understanding of the engineering of how that works will tell you that it’s exceedingly easy to convert that energy to a sudden explosive burst rather than gradual release like it’s done with power generation turbines. These facts have been known and tested since at least the mid 1920’s. Anyway, the engineering is less important here than the juvenile claim that power plants, airplanes, transistors, etc etc are all … fake!
If it’s constantly rehashed in corporate media, especially “true” and “real” history TV specials, and moreover linked to other blatant projects and agendas (“the bikini!”), it is very likely just that — a fairytale.
Simon Smith is correct. nuclear bombs weren’t used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki they were fire bombed just like Hamburg and Dresden et al. (https://www.winterwatch.net/2017/08/was-hiroshima-firebombed-and-not-nuked/). It is easily proved by the concrete buildings that were left standing (the library etc) even though they were at “point zero”. The majority of buildings were made of wood so burned where they stood also if a nuke had been used the rubble would have blocked all the roads. But as can be seen from photos, even of the day after, all the roads are clear.
Personally I am beginning to think that nuclear weapons don’t exist, it is all just “fear porn” used to keep people from fighting back against the shits that are running the planet. They use the threat of nuclear weapons too keep the people down just as they did in the, so called, cold war, as they are doing now with the present war in Ukraine. IT IS ALL BULLSHIT!
In fact the more I think of it the more sure I become. Doesn’t it make you wander why not a single nuke has been used supposedly since 1945? (well apart from carl lewis’s fuckin’ mini nukes of course). The only thing that is holding us back is the threat of nuclear war A NON EXISTANT THREAT.
Addendum, I think it was Simon Smith who wrote on here that nuclear weapons weapons don’t exist a few weeks ago so I decided to look into it (thanks Si). I did find a 30 minute vid that explains it all (fire bombing of Nag/Hor) better than the article mentioned above but unfortunately can’t remember where.
Alexander P. de Seversky got to the bottom of all this in September 1945.
Seversky, it should be noted, was a Russian aviation pioneer who began his own company in the USA following the 1917 October Revolution. His level of expertise and professionalism is not doubted; check his wiki page if you like.
He went to Hiroshima as part of the Allied Occupation and spent some time on the streets there. His conclusion was that the damage of the city was consistent with an attack of high explosives and napalm — a test you can do yourself, even now. Get some images of Dresden, Berlin, Hamburg, and for that matter cities in Japan where “conventional” bombing was used.
You’ll see the same thing Seversky saw: No crater, streets and buildings on the ground still visible, even tall structures near the so-called “Blast Radius”.
Follow the evidence if you like, it’s damning. Nothing at Hiroshima or Nagasaki is one bit different from Dresden, Berlin, or Kobe Japan.
This issue totally bothered me when I first heard it also. Even Joe Stalin, who did not believe the atom bomb story came around anyway. Joe realized he could make a slush fund of billions and intimidate enemies with “bombs” that don’t exist.
At the end of the Pacific War the American Admiral Chester Nimitz, a trained engineer, visited Alamogordo, New Mexico where the atom scientists told him how a single bomb delivered a destructive yield of 40,000 tons of TNT.
Nimitz said “You can believe that if you want. I don’t.”
Seems as if with so many journalists and commenters believing they have license to lie along withal power brokers, that even if NYC was nuked people would not believe it. No the US has used every weapon of mass destruction it has invented.
It is possible that we shall soon find out whether nuclear bombs exist or not. Depending on where you stand you might never know.
@ Mr Palmer
and from where/what is Bikini atoll radioactively
contaminated for generations to come so that
natives have to live elsewhere ?
was it all only a jewish jole ?
So you think there are no nuklear bombs.
But the first nuclear power plant has been build in 1954 :
On June 27, 1954, the world’s first nuclear power station to generate electricity for a power grid, the Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant, commenced operations in Obninsk, in the Soviet Union.
As of 2022, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported there were 422 nuclear power reactors in operation in 32 countries around the world, and 57 nuclear power reactors under construction.[2][3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_plant
In the meantime almost 80 years have past and be asured the nuke bombs exist and it is very high danger right at this time that an atomic war could be started.
Why they did not use the nuke bombs in the last wars ? There was no need to it as the nuke clouds
are transported with the wind to other countries which are not involved. They would not accept it
and a big war would start by the affected countries.
Also there are many different ways to build the content of poisenous “nuke” bombs.
https://rumble.com/v29k9t0-new-911-cancer-cloud-spreading-across-us-after-massive-biological-attack-me.html
https://newspunch.com/inside-job-east-palestine-rolled-out-digital-ids-cdc-changed-toxicity-data-days-before-train-derailment/
XX sounds right and Simon Smith does not: no-nuke advocates are clutching at straws; nothing substantial is in their comments
Here we go again , ball earther Mike D is back with more flat earth denial. Anyone that still believes that we live on the outside of a ball that spins 1000 mph should be medicated immediately.
How dare us not believe in the magic of nuclear weapons. No need for us to ask anymore troublesome questions about Hiroshima and Nagasaki , because the govt. , media , and Mike D say those cities were nuked — case closed.
The Japanese are so clever they fabricated steel and concrete, that were impervious to a millions of degrees of heat that we’re told nukes generate.. Steel vaporizes at 5000 degrees fahrenheit , but not Japanese steel . They have secrets passed down from the Samurai sword makers that allow their steel to survive those temps. In addition, the Japs had no problem immediately rebuilding H and N on top of a radioactive wasteland. Must be all the sushi they eat that gives them such resistance to deadly radiation that is claimed that nukes produce , or perhaps the Japs cleansed the ground with millions of gallons of Saki before rebuilding. There is no limit to their ingenuity and cleverness. Look at their Toyota pickup trucks , they run forever.
Objections to the no-nuke position as what we all went through.
The basics:
1. Radiation — the high explosive bombs of 1945, including New Mexico, were laced with radioactive isotopes. Hiroshima’s radiation came from seeding the clouds with the same isotopes, giving us the BLACK RAIN stories.
2. Nuclear POWER PLANTS are a whole different kettle of fish. Isotopes have heat, in sufficient quantities and under optimal conditions the heat can turn turbines. This was known way before bombs.
3. The evidence at Ground Zero in Hiroshima is utterly lousy. Of six bridges near the hypo-center, only the one already damaged collapsed. People who take their blinders off notice quickly that Hiroshima is far less damaged than many of the German cities of the same era.
3. Robert Oppenheimer really did say “the atom bomb is shit”. At the time everyone thought he meant it was uniquely evil. Along with his other security-breaching statements, he was actually saying it was a fraud. This is part of the reason the American Security Agency prosecuted him.
4. In our era, powerful fuel-air bombs laced with isotopes will be used and called NUKES. It remains a fact that people in the nuclear power business are aware the atomic energy cannot be converted to bombs.
Very bad news.
This means that Iran doesn’t have a nuclear bomb and that Israel, therefore will never get pulverized.
The good news is that so called Israel doesn’t have 300 nukes as they claim and they will be getting their ass kicked very soon.
I’ve lost count the number of times I’ve had to delineate nuclear power (legitimate) from “nukes” (illegitimate) for folk on this site. Even proponents of nukes acknowledge the difference of processes. To use the straw-man of the readily verifiable production of nuclear power and suggest by denying nukes we are denying nuclear power is ignorance or deliberated shilling.
The default position of any person is to accept the proposition that nukes exist. That’s what we have been “educated” towards. Does it occur to those who believe in the nuke narrative that those of us denying them once believed in them? We “nuke deniers” – like “Holocaust” deniers and “Moon landing deniers – have both perspectives…
The notion of Germany supplying nuclear technology to the USA is interesting. I believe the Germans certainly had very primitive anti-gravity technology – NOT THE SOPHISTICATED HOAXED BLUEPRINTS OF THE SO CALLED HAUNEBU – and may have availed themselves of nuclear power in their propulsion system. Hence radioactivity associated with landing sites – the Falcon Lake incident and the Cash-Landrum incidents corroborate this with later anti-gravity tech.
There is a psychological reason why it is accepted by some that Germany supplied “nuke” bomb technology. I believe this is based on an over romanticised view of the Third Reich that people want to believe in. I am not emotionally invested in WWII Germany as being a saint or as a sinner. Nevertheless, Germany was pretty good at innovation. Further, and not unrelated to the point I make below, “nuclear bomb” installations make good cover for exotic propulsion systems IMO – perhaps a contributory – but not singular reason – for the proximity to these sites of UFOs. The pysop may be factored into this too.
@grimsson
Thanks mate. A few years ago I believed in ET visitation of the nuts and bolts variety. The knowledge of the proximity of UFOs to nuclear missile site – with shades of the original predictive programming of the 1951 “The Day The Earth Stood Still” – caused me to re-evaluate my take on the visitors. I reasoned if nukes are non-existent it logically followed that any potential aliens would have the sense to know they didn’t exist either. QED, any flying saucer pestering nuke silos etc. must be of earthly origin.
A celebrated ufologist is Robert Hastings who wrote “UFOs & Nukes” Extraordinary Encounters At Nuclear Weapons Sites” produced the antithesis of what I came to believe, notwithstanding, his book is good, albeit his interpretation is wanting. I doubt if many on here have read his book. My copy still contains twenty or so book-markers and pencil annotations.
When I decided to write on the matter myself I researched various books, articles, and videos even antithetical to my belief. I continue to learn from the likes of Bob Smith who posts here and many others
@ markie,
LOL, pal! As kids says these days … “cool story, brah!”
Why am I not surprised to find you commenting on this topic? I suppose you’re taking a break from your “research” on Tupac still producing rap albums, or the ‘Greys’ living in deep underground bases … amirite?!?
The “points” that you raise can be dismissed out of hand, and definitely do not hold up to basic common-sense and scrutiny. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Fat Man and Little Boy, I think, aren’t even considered ‘first-generation’ A-bombs. In fact, they could be considered prototypes, with a mere 15,000 tons of TNT equivalent … which is not much, considering modern nuclear ballistic missiles can carry 8-10 warheads, with 1.2million tons of TNT equivalent each.
Divide 1.2 million by 15,000. Yes, exactly. That’s exponentially more. A modern nuke dropped NYC, or Miami, or Chicago or Toronto or wherever, would certainly pulverize the city. No doubt. But a puny 15,000 tons of TNT? Not likely. Besides, buildings in Hiroshima at the epicenter were obliterated, but peripheral ones still kept their steel structures. It’s called confirmation bias: you’re looking at a pic 10 miles from the epicenter of the blast, then yelling “see everyone … fake!” because the alleged building is still standing.
I bet you saw that on some Bitchute video, without an iota of critical thought to say “wait a minute, you’re showing me a pic from the next town over from Hiroshima … let’s see some pics from the actual epicenter of the blast in both cities”. Ooops! Exactly, pal. It happens to the best of us … not that you’re close to the “best of us” by any stretch.
It might have been a slip up ?
Or even a ‘Work it out for yourselves’ heads up admission.
That M.O.A.B. incident. Trump & Afghanistan, The Tunnel buster,
proclaimed, ‘The Mother of all Bombs’. hmmmmm.
Was/is that the best they’ve got,
or not. ?
will we ever know.
As for Flat earth, ! Spinning ball, ?
Lets have a proper fight.
It’s Hallow. nowt but a crust with an inner world.
There goes the Bell, round 1.
Ouch–Flat Earth in the comments, and the stupidity really hurts because we have no place to engage the victim, like if you were digging the Channel Tunnel from both ends and did not meet in the middle, or if you were speaking English and he was hearing French
Yes..it was quite obvious… with the charade in the Ukraine and all the bluster and threats the ‘jews’ in the Kremlin were farting into the ether..
every other minute…
…that there is something very wrong with all of this… the ‘theatre’ having betrayed itself…which to anyone with a scintilla of intelligence had been manifest for years…
Still… some fools still believe a bunch of masons went to the ‘Moon’ in a tin foil bath tub….
and brought back some old fossils from the Gobi desert…
lt’s all lies you see…but you have to know the Truth to see them..which seems beyond the capabilities of the common imbecile…
and that’s by intelligent design..
chesterton–they might hand out fake moon-rocks because the real ones were too valuable, in demand for study