Claire Hibbs – Daily Sceptic Feb 3, 2023
Mark Kerry was a healthy 48 year-old from Worcestershire, a father of three, grandfather of two and a loving husband to his wife Melanie. Together with Melanie, Mark loved life and lived it to the full, they socialised with friends every weekend, loved to travel and loved holidays.
Mark and Melanie run mobile home parks and were heavily impacted in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic hit. With the mobile home business being a mixture of residential and holidays, the holiday side was halted when lockdown and heavy restrictions were enforced. As with millions of people worldwide, they found themselves spending most of their time at home.
Like most of us, Mark was eager to get life back to some form of normality and, knowing the business was suffering and being self-employed, the quicker the better.
In late 2020, nine months into the COVID-19 pandemic, it was announced that a Covid vaccine had been approved and was being rolled out to stop the spread of the virus and save lives, ready for use in December 2020.
This was exciting news for Mark and Melanie. Their lives and their business had been placed on hold for far too long and they were ready and eager to resume their lives as they were pre-pandemic; the vaccine was the way out. Mark waited patiently for his turn to have his first jab. While waiting, the media was full of stories of how wonderful these vaccines were and that everyone absolutely must get this vaccine. It was suggested if you don’t get the vaccine you are being selfish. The Prime Minister and Cabinet ministers were telling the public daily on TV that everyone must have it, as well as every news channel and road signs everywhere saying the same. GPs were sending letters, flyers were coming through the door, doctors were all over the TV, with some doctors even suggesting the AstraZeneca vaccine was 100% safe and effective. This of course was what we were all hoping for and most of the population believed.
Finally it was Marks turn to have his vaccine. On March 2nd 2021 Mark had his first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Initially everything was fine and Mark seemed to escape the mild flu-like side-effects and aching arm that people were talking about. That was until the evening of March 15th 2021 when Mark had a headache and noticed blood in his urine. Melanie called 111 and they sent them to Worcester hospital. When the doctor examined Mark he noticed that Mark had a rash on his legs and admitted him straight away. Over the next day Mark’s headache got worse and, following some blood tests, it was revealed that Mark’s platelet count was at a very low rate of 14; normal levels would read between 150 and 450, so this in itself was alarming. On top of that results from a brain scan revealed a blood clot on Marks brain known as Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST).
CVST is a type of rare blood clot that forms in the venous sinuses in your brain. This is a system of veins found between the layers of the dura mater – the tough outer layer of your brain that lies directly under your skull.
The clot can block the blood in your brain from draining out toward your heart. When this happens, blood cells may break from the pressure, cross the blood-brain barrier and seep into nearby brain tissue. This can cause a haemorrhage, a type of stroke that stems from internal bleeding. CVST can be life-threatening. You need immediate medical attention.
Very quickly the doctors informed Mark and Melanie that they thought it was a reaction to the vaccine. The next day, on March 17th 2021, Mark was getting worse and lost some of the use in his left leg and arm. Another scan was ordered and this revealed the clot was growing. Melanie realised how poorly Mark was. This was extremely distressing as due to the COVID-19 restrictions Melanie was unable to be on the ward with Mark. The nurses brought Mark into the corridor of the hospital in a wheelchair to see her. They told each other how much they loved each other and Mark told Melanie to tell their children how much he loved them. The nurses told Melanie they would get a side room ready for when Melanie came back in the evening so she could stay the night by Mark’s side.
That evening, before Melanie got back to the hospital, the hospital rang to say Mark had deteriorated and was now having seizures. He had also gone into cardiac arrest, and they made the decision to put Mark in an induced coma and on a ventilator. Melanie rushed to the hospital along with family members. They let her and their three children, Mark, Robert and Nicole wait in the corridor to say goodbye to Mark before they moved him to Birmingham Queen Elizabeth hospital. He was in an induced coma and they were told to expect the worst. On March 18th 2021, the hospital told the family that scans were showing Mark had a bleed on the brain and even if he survived there would likely be significant damage and not to expect Mark to walk out of the hospital. Mark’s family couldn’t just leave him and go home so they stayed in their cars outside the hospital all week, but still unable to see Mark due to the COVID-19 restrictions.
The hospital called the family in the afternoon and told them they couldn’t control the seizures and they wouldn’t stop so they needed to perform a thrombectomy to remove the clot. Melanie and the family were devastated and were desperate to see Mark. Melanie was told she could see him before they did the procedure but sadly when she got to the intensive care unit doors, despite Melanie crying and begging, the doctors wouldn’t let her in and she was just told to wait to hear from them.
Fortunately, the thrombectomy went well and Mark survived the procedure. He was then left to rest for a few days. After a few days the medical team couldn’t wake Mark successfully so on March 25th they put in a tracheostomy and on March 26th Mark finally woke. However it wasn’t until April 3rd, when they took the tracheostomy out, that Melanie and the family could finally talk to him on the phone. Mark had lost a lot of use of his left arm and leg, but over the coming days thankfully a lot of this returned. Mark was finally discharged from hospital on April 9th 2021, 26 days after being admitted. Against the odds, Mark proved the doctors wrong and walked out of the hospital, albeit loaded with several medications and a long road ahead.
Once home, Mark had to do a lot of therapy. He has now made a good recovery, considering what was expected. However his three fingers on his left hand are not really working and he still suffers with debilitating side effects. But both Mark and Melanie feel they are very lucky that he survived and thank the doctors and nurses for saving his life.
Even though when in hospital Mark was told that the AstraZeneca vaccine caused the CVST, it wasn’t until sometime after he left the hospital that they fully understood what the cause was. It was explained that Mark was diagnosed with Vaccine induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT).
VITT is diagnosed by having all five of the following:
- Onset of symptoms five to 30 days after vaccination against COVID-19.
- Presence of thrombosis (blood clots)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet count under 150)
- D-Dimer level over 4000
- Positive anti-PF4 antibodies on ELISA
Mark had all of these, so his diagnosis was confirmed as VITT induced by the AstraZeneca vaccine. There are approximately 444 confirmed cases of VITT in the U.K. and sadly 81 deaths. However, this number is likely to be much higher as thousands of people who suffered blood clots were not given the relevant tests to detect VITT.
To this day, Mark’s PF4 antibodies are still testing positive, so he is still on the same blood-thinning tablets and blood pressure tablets as he came home from hospital with. He now has blood tests every four weeks. As VITT is a newly identified disease there are uncertainties around the decisions on stopping blood-thinning medications and it is still uncertain what it means when PF4 antibodies are still testing positive. Also, Mark’s latest scan revealed the blood on his brain has not dispersed and he still takes 3000mg of levetiracetam a day to prevent seizures, the same amount he came home from hospital with. The doctor has said with time this will be reduced but he will remain on them for the rest of his life.
Since being discharged from hospital Mark has had to go back in: his platelet levels dropped again and he needed an immunoglobulin infusion (IVIg), which made him feel so poorly he needed to go back yet again. It is now almost two years later but Mark still suffers and his life has been hugely affected. He remains extremely weak and tired; he suffers from debilitating fatigue and has daily headaches. Melanie lovingly explains he really doesn’t complain, saying he is marvellous and they know he is so lucky to be alive.
Following almost two years of living in a nightmare, Mark and Melanie are now trying desperately to return to as much normality as possible. They are self-employed and work together so have been impacted hugely, emotionally and financially. Mark is trying to do as much as he can possibly manage.
They applied to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) in April 2021. They really didn’t get much feedback for months. In June 2022, over a year later, they were told that Mark’s claim had been sent to the medical assessors. The medical assessors are the decisionmakers and assessed Mark’s claim solely on his medical notes that were requested early on; no personal assessment would be carried out and no up-to-date medical records would be requested, so the assessment is not based on any ongoing symptoms or any disabilities that have occurred as a result of VITT.
On December 23rd 2022, Melanie and Mark received an email saying a letter had been sent with the medical assessors’ decision. Melanie asked if the decision could be emailed and on December 29th 2022 that email arrived. It said that the medical assessors accepted causation – that the vaccine had caused Mark’s illness – but did not accept that Mark had reached the 60% disablement that is required to be eligible for an award. They only took into consideration Mark’s hand; they didn’t even mention all the medication he needs to prevent seizures, now or in the future, or take into account how Mark’s life has been impacted by fatigue and daily headaches.
So after two years of living in this nightmare, a future that has now been dramatically altered, no help will be offered by our Government – the same Government that spoke on TV daily throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and the months to follow, telling us all that we must have the vaccine to stop the spread and to save lives. The same Government that told us all that the vaccine was safe and effective. The same Government that prevented us from travelling if we weren’t fully vaccinated. And the same Government that told us we were selfish if we didn’t have the vaccine. Mark had done what was asked of him by our Government, and now Mark and Melanie will have to live with that decision and the consequences for the rest of their lives. Any help from our Government has now been rejected.
Mark and Melanie, who are members of VIBUK, will now be asking for a mandatory reconsideration and will be supplying further evidence which was not requested by the VDPS. If this fails then it will go to a tribunal. But one thing is for sure, none of us are giving up and VIBUK will continue to fight and campaign for a reform of the current VDPS which we all agree is unfit for purpose.
The latest VDPS figures show, as of January 10th 2023, there were 491 VDPS claims rejected and only 33 awarded – a success rate of just 6%. Thousands more are still waiting for their decisions, and with the percentage of claims being rejected so high it is expected that there will be many more disappointments in the coming weeks.
This is extremely upsetting for many who are injured, who can no longer live the lives they had pre-vaccine and also for the families of the bereaved. The financial impact is enormous and many claimants and families are desperate for financial help; the VDPS was a lifeline that has now, in more than 90% of cases to date, been taken away.
Many can no longer work due to the injuries caused by the vaccine and many families have been hugely impacted financially and emotionally by the loss of a loved one. Lots of these families have been told they are not eligible for a payment by our Government, some because the medical assessors believed on the balance of probability the vaccine was not the cause of the injuries or death and some because the assessors believed the claimant is not injured enough, that they do not reach the 60% threshold required to be eligible for an award. Some of those rejected on the 60% threshold but accepted on causation, such as Mark, have a range of shocking injuries that vary from brain damage, blindness, permanent seizures, loss of feeling in limbs, loss of mobility, neurological issues, debilitating fatigue and damage to internal organs including serious heart conditions, plus many more. But the medical assessors have based their decisions on their own opinions, ignoring the opinions of the specialist consultants such as neurologists and haematologists. Many of those rejected will now be appealing and asking for a mandatory reconsideration.
—
Claire Hibbs, who was injured by the AstraZeneca vaccine, is part of Vaccine Injured and Bereaved U.K. (VIBUK), a group of individuals injured or bereaved by the Covid vaccines (with medical or coroners’ reports confirming this) campaigning for a change to the current Government vaccine damage payment scheme (VDPS) to create a bespoke COVID-19 compensation scheme that ensures the adversely affected are appropriately compensated and supported. They also want people similarly affected by the vaccines to know that help is available and for their stories to be heard and not ignored. VIBUK can be found on Twitter and contacted here
Donate to help the Daily Sceptic
No one with a brain gives a shit about sheeple like Mr Kerry.
The more thickos that die, the better.
Told they are ‘safe’. What does ‘safe’ mean? I’ll tell you, if means feck all. Nothing is safe.
I am pleased that most compensation applications are being rejected, but I think this is going to change.
While big pharma is protected in respect of the jabs, there is a route to successful prosecution. The regime conspired with big pharma to use unsafe M-RNA tech. There’s no way that share holder profit driven big pharma would’ve started their Covid research using M-RNA tech, unless the regime told them to, and that M-RNA jabs would be passed under emergency grounds, and that big pharma would be protected against M-RNA injury/death claims.
Despite me pointing out this legal opportunity on this site, many, many times, no one has shown the slightest interest. This leads me to be very suspicious of this site, the content creators, and those who comment and read here.
IMHO, this route to a successful prosecution of those in the Nazi regime and big pharma corporates, would be higher than 95%.
But oh feck me, the truth and alternative news community prefer to dance around their handbags, much like 9/11, & everything in between.
NEVER TRUST SUPERIORS IN
POWER POSITIONS !
they are a class distinguished from yours
and dont have same interests + intentions .
I would not even trust my neighbour in
hands of the landlord . dont trust both !
As if the ‘govern-ment’ are going to pay out ‘damages’ to the proles they are trying to intentionally murder..
for consequent damage sustained whilst ‘govern-ment’ is intentionally trying to murder them…
and without layer after layer of Kafkaesque nonsense…. (during which they hope you will die)..
..(and even if they eventually do it will all be clawed back in ahem.. ‘treatment’ and ‘care’ .. because you would have to be more or less a vegetable with minimal life expectancy)…
You see.. to the rogues that created the necessary circumstances to pump this ‘injection’ into this careless imbecile.. this isn’t a failure…no no… this is a success..
How at this point could anyone doubt that…
NB: As proof and testament to the absolute imbecility of most of the imbeciles out there in clown town…l have been noticing an upsurge in those ‘admitting’ suffering ahem..so called ‘mild myocarditis’.. (as l’m sure you have also)…
which is evidence of both the power of the media-plex to confound and obfuscate and the general dim-wittedness of the average killer ape..
Because of course myocarditis is never mild and will only get progressively worse as it destroys the heart..
..generally killing you within five years..
Lockdown was as bad as the needling, and when I saw people accepting it on Easter Sunday 2020, sunny, Spring, everyone indoors, I knew they were not viable entities and that the twenty years of internet had not taught them anything: they let government get between them and a Spring day, so they were suicidal, and are born from the suicidal. They were White and we should let it be seen that this is the Slave Race, Jews and some ETs are masters, and Blacks are beneficiaries in the other relationship, replacements, and not requiring needling. Blacks accepted slavery thousands of years ago, so they are tolerated, while the Whites have slavery as a prelude to death. To see it as good news, we note that a free hard-core is not co-operating, and we only lose the unaware ones, even if it is a big proportion
I think it’s time for all those who made a quid from the jib-jab industry, I mean everyone from celebrities to YouTube bloggers, politicians, industry workers everyone even those whose shares rose in this corrupt scam to cough-up.
Too bad there wasn’t a Jewish insurance company which said the price for participating is 1% of gross annual income. That should be plenty to compensate all the vaxxed injured.
There would also be plenty spare cash to prosecute the criminals at the top…
its the same trick they used after 2 world wars
war injury compensations
they had panels of ” experts ” whose job it was to find ways not to pay
w w 1 grandad lost a leg
they said you can still work and do a job
w w 2 dad came out mentally wrecked from seeing german soldiers and civilians
tortured and used as medical fodder at porton down
he sat in an armchair for 25 years before his death and never gota penny
Nutter Carl Jones still thinks ‘Nazis’ govern the UK & not Marxist & Zionist Jews.
@GOY BUOY
I think all insurance compaies are jewish
like all big corporations since jews are
always there where the big money is .
and Rothschilds Klaus Schwab knows it .
“Mark Kerry was a healthy 48 year-old from Worcestershire, a father of three, grandfather of two and a loving husband to his wife Melanie. Together with Melanie, Mark loved life and lived it to the fullest.” …Mark, ladies and gentlemen, is a moron.
“Mark waited patiently for his turn to have his first jab. While waiting, the media was full of stories of how wonderful these vaccines were and that everyone absolutely must get this vaccine. It was suggested if you don’t get the vaccine you are being selfish. The Prime Minister and Cabinet ministers were telling the public daily on TV that everyone must have it, as well as every news channel and road signs everywhere saying the same.” … Allow me to amend my commend above: Mark was dangerously stupid.
Yes, Mark was dangerously stupid. It should have been obvious to Mark that a real “pandemic” doesn’t need a marketing campaign. And it wasn’t just a marketing campaign, it was a marketing saturation blitz. Mark should have realized the reason for the lockdown was so dumb-f*ck plebs like him wouldn’t see the obvious, that there was no “pandemic”. But I suspect you could have marched an imbecile like Mark through an empty hospital at the height of the hysteria and he still wouldn’t have gotten a clue. There are A LOT of Marks out there.
Mark is now good and totally f*cked. So Mark should do the right thing, target one of the cartel tyrants, and take the scum with him on his way out. But I doubt Mark would do that, because Mark is a f*cking idiot and a sniveling coward.
A choleric disposition, is what it is, Carl but hasn’t it ever occured to you that you may be misgiven in your boastfulness? You recently claimed to be the first and only person who has pointed out, at this site, that the laws of fraud are the correct way to proceed against the government ministers and corporate executives of BigPharma. You repeat as much today, in twin comments at two different feature articles.
I dispute that you are the only person to have pointed this out. Several of us have, on several occasions, discussed this viable legal approach, here at these very pages.
My own, earliest take on the matter was February 23, 2021, where I spoke of Michael of Bernicia’s legal action against Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson for high fraud. I have written about this legal action many times since and have linked Michael’s site often. I have donated money to support his efforts.
The trial seems to be in abeyance at the moment but there is a recent update on the procedural quagmire at thebernician.net. The case is being impeded by craftful legal professionals, including high court judges, who have attempted to invalidate the admissability of the private public prosecution.
Michael is very intelligent, however and has defeated extremely powerful opponents in court before. I’m confident that he’ll get his case to trial. Perhaps, Carl, your disregard for your fellows, causes you not to hear others sometimes. I’ve been talking about the utility of a legal reproach, using the laws of financial fraud, against government ministers (and there beyond, pharmaceutical executives) for very nearly three years now. Unlike yourself, I make no claim to be a pioneer, however. The legal mechanics, involved in this route, were taught to me by Michael of Bernicia, who persuaded me early on, that in terms of law, the intelligent approach to contending legally with these four very powerful men (one less so now, perhaps) was to prosecute them for preferentially tendering contracts to companies with which they had pre-existing business associations. This can be proven and Michael and his team have compiled an unassailable dossiere of documentary proofs, showing that all four men benefitted handsomely from contractual awards, handed to fellow mobsters in the pharma syndicate.
Why do you always upbraid and chide others, Carl? I think that I mentioned the legal vulnerability of ministers to the charge of criminal fraud, long before you ever did. So, ner-ner-ner-neh.
I was paralyzed for 10 days in 1984. I came out of paralysis slowly, and was fortunate enough to be able to walk again. But I was thrust into a terrifying world of pain, weakness, muscle spasms and neuropathic pain. so I know exactly what these poor people are going through. It takes quite a while for your mind to accept the pain you are living with. You keep going to the doctors hoping for relief, and little help is there. I had received the baptism of the Holy Spirit a couple years before the accident. So my faith in the Lord Jesus Christ has helped to sustain and strengthened me all these years.
1 Peter 4:1-2 KJVS
Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; [2] That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God.
http://www.justifiedfreely.com
andyay: no you didn’t, not in respect of what I outline.
To think that the vaccines were not ready to go and the adverse effects were not known to the central planners is just more naïve sheeple thinking. The mental malaise of course comes from constant media and government brainwashing and also is greatly supported by people who are able to connect the dots but are either too compromised or too lazy to know and question the actual justifications for the entire plandemic, the mRNA jabs, the UN Agendas, the WEF Resets, the global warming fraud, the deliberate interferences with agricultural production, and even the orchestrated financial liquidity problems “necessitating” a global digital reserve currency more friendly to nations in Asia which are not in the 100% control of the Western centralizing power structure.
The planned unlimited production of QE fiat to infinity was not just a US operation, but every single nation in the Western orb dutifully followed suit as all of our currencies are pegged on the US dollar. None of the major motives exposed over the past 3 years for the plandemic and the Covid mRNA jabs are mutually exclusive and do relate to particular stakeholder interests, and they include: a vastly increased centralized national and globalist controls over our basic rights and our health; suppression of personal rights and freedom to usher in the UN Agendas; vast profits for the supporting globalist insiders (including fakes like Trump) who invested in big pharma; setting an enforceable precedent and pattern for continued forced vaccine programs based on fake “emergency conditions” used to suppress all rights and dissent; and establishing the overture for continued mass and selective culling operations to occur over the ensuing years. For the survivors who are injured they will throw just enough made-out-of-nothing inflationary fits at them as a bandage to placate the aggrieved, and they are all now very happy that the injured sheeple will flock to their completely-controlled courts for redress.
It is all planned and that is why the climate of fear and uncertainty is constantly maintained. As announced they have very specific goals to attain in the lockstep timetable, and we know that any legitimate dissent is being carefully cancelled and dissipated through their sophisticate repression measures and also with some money for the injured survivors who quality. They are still carrying on with measures to slow the economy and make people more dependent on their centralized controls, and they are behaving as if the toxic jabs (proven to be totally unnecessary for anything from the beginning) are somehow still necessary. It is all lockstep planning.
The planning for the UN Agendas and the leveling planned for the alleged “excesses” of the West in terms of consumption and useless people, goes all the way back to the 1960’s and then crystalized in 1974 in the secret Rothschild and Rockefeller radical and coercive population reduction polices as outlined in the “Kissinger Plan” also know as NSSM 200, which was hatched mainly in US think tanks. You would think that some Western oligarchs would have mounted an opposition to the plans once they were exposed in 1980, but not a one.
To think that with all of the coercive IMF and World Bank population-reduction conditions imposed on developing nations to get the debt-rigging loan money they never controlled, that that very globalist policy was not the basis of the disastrous Chines one-child policy, or that the idea came from the Chinese military, is the dumbest and most naïve thinking which every existed. The NSSM 200 policy “coincidentally” was officially set down for all Western establishment operatives a few years after Kissinger two visits to Mao in the early 1970’s, and right before full-scale trade officially began with China at the end of that decade. Before the Chinese government officially announced the one-child policy in about 1981 those plans had been firmly in the works at the beginning of open trade. To think that China was some kind of developing-world exempt from the draconian population-reduction conditions of the Western oligarchs is absurd. These are the same oligarchs who heavily invested in China and used Western markets to transfer vast amounts of wealth to themselves, while at the same time they were imposing coercive population-control polices in every other developing nation their economic hitmen and jackals were coercing.
That the planning and backing of the UN and the UN Agendas by the functionaries of the Western oligarchs have been to expand their centralized controls over virtually everything on the planet should be a given.
That the unifying sustainability principle uniting and motivating the same power brokers underlying their manufactured and exaggerated UN sustainability perils is radical population reduction ought to be another given.
That most people on the planet do not believe there are too many people on the planet is another fact and a given.
That what is actually sustaining many people in positions of authority following the dictates of the Western oligarchs in all of the vile Covid planning, are the UN sustainability arguments and modelling for the future – i.e., – the planning they have been deluded as being “necessary”, should be another major given.
The problem with all of the UN sustainability planning is that it is all “old-hat”. All of the sustainability modelling is more than a half a century old. It is all based on invalid modeling, false data, widely fluctuating variables, speculation, and money to all of the sycophants. Their focus is centralized controls over virtually everything, culminating after a history of ruthless power and wealth grabs over resources, production, fiancés, trade and over our very lives. The globalists middle people caught up in this movement no longer care about justifications no matter how invalid the modelling and predictions were at the time of casting the lockstep UN Agenda 21 in 1992.
Like the peak oil peril when that card was played other sources of energy were utilized. World development does not require the dismantling of the Western economy or artificial and centralized methods to equalize anything – except full disclosure and honesty with respect to all dealings between nations and between governments and the people they are supposed to be serving. Behaving in that way to resolve problems is totally inimical to ways of the power moguls who rely totally on mass deceptions, mass brainwashing, mass fear, mass coercion operations, blackmail, graft, insider trading, murders, coups, and intimidation to maintain and expand their power over us.
@ Anyday to Carl
“You recently claimed to be the first and only person who has pointed out, at this site, that the laws of fraud are the correct way to proceed against the government ministers and corporate executives of BigPharma.”
You think you can trust the legal system for any kind of truth or redress in all of this. You must be totally taken in with your reliance on the system, and your words falling on deaf ears in some of our major institutions. They are all in lockstep – corporate, government, mainstream media, military, police, judicial and even religious. They are all in on it, all in total lockstep obedience. As the facts unfold and deaths multiply all they will do is to keep up the pretense and try to suppress the spread of the truth, maintain their lies, keep jabbing people, while they keep the crematoriums running non stop.
The courts did nothing to protect anyone from the government abuses during the totally fake and unnecessary Covid lockdowns, and only the foolish think that muttering legal maxims on top of proven facts in a court of law will do anything but delay and allow all of the perps to get off of the hook. The supermarkets where I live are still pushing the jabs and the pretense continues that they are “necessary” and not essentially toxic.
andyay: don’t put words in my mouth, that I didn’t say. I wouldn’t call it fraud. Big pharma decided to start their research using M-RNA tech, because th e UK regime/deep state/MI6 told them that it would be rubber stamped.
I would call it a wilful desire to use a tech no matter what harm it did. As such, there was little or no fraud. M-RNA, or regular jabs would have attracted the same debt spend by the regime.
The Russians acquired Porton Down developed double vector vaccines. This was the official cure for the elites.
Given the scale of the crimes, and those involved, my route to some sort of justice is relatively simple. You simply question Big Pharma bosses why they started their research using M-RNA tech that wasn’t safe? From this, their are two possible answers. One, they wilfully decided to ignore their legal duties towards their shareholders, or two, they were directed to use M-RNA tech, because the deep state wanted them to, and that it would be rubber stamped. It doesn’t matter if the M-RNA jabs were developed in 2017, or during the first half of 2020. Putin destroyed MI6’s time line. The Covid crisis was probably supposed to run for 5yrs, but Putin threw a spanner in the works.
Maybe M-RNA jab were supposed to be ready by 2025, after much of the world economy had been decimated by Covid. This was MI6’s plan, to boost the UKs standing by destroying its rivals, including the US.
EXCELLENT COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION HERE (I forgot “caps” was on; hihihi…)
The best part of the ToothSeeker is the Comment Section. “Everybody knows…”
I am thinking of posting a number of these comments at Mami’s. If any commenters have any objections to that, just let me know and I shall refrain.
I will add to the chorus by restating my position which can be summed up by the following two questions:
Question 1 is directed at the LOCKSTEP MONSTERS who are constantly telling us what to do and what to believe:
HOW COME YOU’RE NOT IN JAIL?!
Question 2 is directed at EVERYBODY ELSE:
WHO’S GOING TO PUT THEM IN JAIL?!
Vladimir Putin said he would target the order givers. When are you going to go for the head of the snake Mr. Putin? Or are you in lockstep with the Lockstep Monsters?
Buddhist Monks Join Canadian Truckers To Celebrate Freedom Honk-A-Thon
🚛🎺💖🚚🚚
UNACCEPTABLE VIEWS (2022) Full Documentary – Citizen Camera
Intent to Harm – Evidence of the Conspiracy to Commit Mass Murder by the US DOD, HHS, Pharma Cartel – Suggested by Dr. Amanda
RageCast 300: FADE TO BLACK – Raging Dissident
February 18, 2022 was when they started unlawfully removing the truckers. It was the day the government jackboots ran down Canadian citizens with horses. Trudeau unlawfully invoked the EMA and illegally removed peaceful protestors.
Full of self importance
The West is impotent
Paid for vile malfeasance
The West Is Insolent
Soon to be deleted
The West is depleted
Replete with the conceited
The West will be defeated
Voltman
https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2023/02/ragecast-300-fade-to-black-west-is-now.html
@ Fred B
That’s a new one on me. I’ve never been criticised by a professional lawyer for having too much faith in legal recourse before! It’s somehow rather delightful.
In truth, I have no faith in the Judiciary to dispense justice judiciously. I’ve represented myself twice legally and won on each occasion. I’m fully aware that the globalist offensive against us, depends on a primed and committed support infrastructure of co-religionists, freemasonic traitors, the bribed, the compromised and the infantile grass-roots communist apparatuses, (BLM, LGBTQ, Antifa and chic Satanic groups like the Satanic Temple etc.)
I have merely endeavoured to explore all possible methods of redress against our enemies.
At least you’re speaking to me again. I thought that you were wrong. You thought that you were justified, according to your purposeful intentions. So what? If two men cannot address a disputation among themselves, honestly and peaceably, what hope for a resolution to conflicts do we have?
@ Carl Jones
I’m sorry that I put words into your mouth. I shall recite the Hail Mary 100 times in contrition. In truth, I knew that you hadn’t referred to fraud, specifically, as your preferred prosecutorial approach. You talked more abstractedly of “criminality.”
I’m still a little unclear as to which laws that you would use to criminally indict BigPharma executives on charges of knowingly dispensing an unsafe medication. That would involve establishing that the blanket legal immunity bestowed upon BigPharma and its employees was invalid, constitutionally. That would be a difficult and protracted trial, involving plentiful (and bountiful) constitutional wranglings for legal teams.
As the UK Supreme Court has pronounced, “fraud unravels all.” Where abuse of process or power occurs, it is more often the case, as Fred B says, that the perpetrators have their backs very much covered. How did Eliot Ness bring down Al Capone?
My understanding is that, only the laws of fraud are feasible, in terms of the likelihood of the success of criminal prosecutions brought against the individual actors responsible for the farrago.
It was because of my conviction on this matter, that I, rapscallion-style, projected that you had premised your argument on the viability of criminal prosecution for fraud. I thought that you might be talking about fraud – but that’s all.
Now, where have I put my rosary and flail?