Rhoda Wilson – The Expose Jan 23, 2023
You have likely heard that 97% of scientists agree on human-driven climate change. The overwhelming majority of scientists take no view on the question of whether climate change is man-made, for it is beyond our present knowledge to answer.
Only 0.3% of science papers state humans are the cause of climate change. And when surveyed, only 18% of scientists believed that a large amount – or all – of additional climate change could be averted.
There is no scientific evidence or method that can determine how much of temperature change since 1900 was caused by humans. We know that temperature has varied greatly over the millennia. We also know that for virtually all of that time, global warming and cooling were driven entirely by natural forces.
“97% Consensus” — What Consensus?
By Gregory Wrightstone, Executive Director CO2 Coalition
You have likely heard that 97% of scientists agree on human-driven climate change. You may also have heard that those who don’t buy into the climate-apocalypse mantra are “science deniers.” The truth is that a whole lot more than 3% of scientists are sceptical of the party line on climate. A whole lot more.
The many scientists, engineers and energy experts that comprise the CO2 Coalition are often asked something along the lines of: “So you believe in climate change, then?” Our answer? “Yes, of course we do: it has been happening for hundreds of millions of years.” It is important to ask the right questions. The question is not, “Is climate change happening?” The real question of serious importance is, “Is climate change now driven primarily by human actions? That question should be followed up by “is our changing climate beneficial or harmful to ecosystems and humanity?”
There are some scientific truths that are quantifiable and easily proven, and with which, I am confident, at least 97% of scientists agree. Here are two:
- Carbon dioxide concentration has been increasing in recent years.
- Temperatures, as measured by thermometers and satellites, have been generally increasing in fits and starts for more than 150 years.
What is impossible to quantify is the actual percentage of warming that is attributable to increased anthropogenic (human-caused) CO2. There is no scientific evidence or method that can determine how much of the warming we’ve had since 1900 that was directly caused by us.
We know that temperature has varied greatly over the millennia. We also know that for virtually all of that time, global warming and cooling were driven entirely by natural forces, which did not cease to operate at the beginning of the 20th century.
The claim that most modern warming is attributable to human activities is scientifically insupportable. The truth is that we do not know. We need to be able to separate what we do know from that which is only conjecture.
“Very few scientists agree that climate change is driven by human activity”, but all of them know it is the result of the deep state program of Geo-Engineering and Chem-trails continuous activity for over a century now…
The Israel Overlords have to ‘prove’ (via geoengineering) that ‘climate change’ exists–thus providing them with the pretext or rationale to institute their WEF Agenda 2030 techno-Communist slave society upon these ‘western nations’.
1) Create the fabricated problem (‘climate change’ aka geoengineering change)
2) Provide the solution (WEF Great Reset/techno-Communism)
3) Cattle safe & happy in their electric cars & herded into digital/biometric diversity ‘smart cities’.
Other breaking news…”Mafeking has just been relieved…”
https://www.serendipity.li/climate/hieb/greenhouse_data.html
Man made CO2 is only 0.117% of the total warming of all gases from all sources.
I used to blog on the CO2 topic, starting around 2009 for about 10 years until google and wordpress took down all of my blogs.
So here are some big takeaways of what I learned:
1. If the planet is greening right now from CO2 going up that means plants have DNA that thrive in higher CO2 levels. Plants evolved over billions of years in a much higher CO2 environment. Thus, correct logic, CO2 at current levels are at recovery levels.
2. Temperature and CO2 are not correlated. Ice core samples prove this, they drill in frozen lakes and get over 500,000 years of data, show that CO2 lags behind temp going up and down. That means CO2 is not causal to temperature swings.
3. The vast amount of CO2 is in ocean water, CO2 in the air is minor, and is controlled by the ocean temp. As oceans warm, CO2 comes out, no different than the dissolved CO2 in your carbonated drink on a hot summer’s day.
4. Politicians are born liars, telling truth is not in their skill set, anything that any political opportunist says should be held in skepticism. Politicians like to control the population with lies, and ultimately all of their plans end in our deaths. Holy books have lost their effectiveness in controlling western societies, so a new myth was created, climate change, and it is just as opaque and vague as heaven. (no one can describe what heaven is actually like, yet you are to live your entire live for it) In religiously repressed Muslim societies, the elite/intellectuals/priests have no need to push climate change, as the holy book is quite effective for their control. No Afghan warlord is worried about climate change.
5. The sun is the primary driver of climate on earth. The sun is constantly warming the side toward it, and dark side is constantly cooling, heat is radiated out to space every night and the average temperature is between the extremes of heating and cooling and CO2 has nothing to do with it.
6. Without sunlight energy, earth in space would freeze into a ball of ice, and life would die. Without CO2, all life would die. The two things absolutely necessary for life, sunlight and CO2, Bill Gates wants to stop. If Gates succeeded in blocking sunlight with his hair brained high altitude atmospheric spraying project he could actually wipe humans off the planet.
7. Earth is currently in an ice age epoch, that can last for many millions of years, maybe tens of millions of years or more. The ice age cycle, 100,000 years of glaciation with 10-20,000 years of interglacial is a well known cycle unaffected by CO2 levels. Thus all this hoopla about CO2 warming and creating a hot house earth is just 100% false. Palm trees are never going to grow in Minneapolis in our lifetimes.
8. In the last glaciation, CO2 got so low plants died. Only about 12,000 years ago were CO2 levels, at 240ppm, could man farm. When the industrial revolution started, CO2 was barely higher, at 280 ppm, and since then CO2 going to 415 ppm has doubled crop yields. The low CO2 of the late Pleistocene is a leading suspect in megafauna die offs.
9. Glaciations start with high CO2 levels and end with low CO2 levels, as proven by ice core data, thus the basic claim of CO2 controlling temp is false. Since CO2 does not even effect temperature, all of Al Gore and other alarmist claims will fail 100% of time. At Davos, Gore claimed the oceans would boil, and he made that statement when is was -20F at Davos last week. Long before the ocean would boil, all the snow at Davos would be a thing of the past.
Just a mere 20,000 years ago Canada was covered in ice a mile or more thick. This ice flowed over New York state, leaving behind evidence.
The large rocks strewn around upstate New York, erratics as they are called, were a great mystery until some genius figured out where they came from – glaciers which carried them south.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_erratic
Back in my youth, I actually hiked on a ridge between the finger lakes to see the grooves cut by the glaciers. Quite impressive, the ice was a mile above the top of the ridge.
https://go.owu.edu/~jbkrygier/krygier_html/geog_111/geog_111_lo/geog_111_lo14_gr/kellysgrooves2.jpg
Now look at these charts, interglacials are short lived affairs:
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=glaciation+cycles+chart&iax=images&ia=images
And we are 7,000 years past the warmest point of our current interglacial (the holocene) and temperatures are already going down, and accelerating down.
https://imgpile.com/images/1ICvCk.md.png
Al Gore is a dunce, we are still in the ice age, at the end of an interglacial, and what is coming are colder temperatures, not boiling oceans.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/al-gore-has-history-of-climate-predictions-statements-proven-false/ar-AA16CfOB
Every solar cycle, the top solar physicists get together and present papers and try to predict the next 11 year solar cycle, and no one can do it, no matter how many PhDs they have attached to their name, no matter what prestigious university they are from. So how in the hell could Al Gore, who never took even one collegiate science course, predict jack shit?
And little Greta, what does some high school drop out know about science or climate?
Not a damn thing.
In the 21st Century we must all realize that there are enormous profit in lies and little profit from truths.
The implication of fear has entered into the marketing world replacing new and improved
and of course, “on sale.”
Rather inconveniently, record cold weather in Asia.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-24/freezing-weather-in-north-asia-sets-record-low-snarls-transport
Excellent from Yukon Jack again.
Much appreciated.
Who can remember taking a ‘Jug’ to the chippy with a tea towel, to take home the mushy peas ! (yeah, it wqs to keep the tucker warm, no one had a car back then, we walked everywhere) The Fish & chips in a sheet of grease proof paper, all bundled up in newspapers, that were brought in periodically by the local customers,
And the milk man used to collect the empty bottles, as he delivered the fresh milk each morning. I’ll bet ‘Grotesque Dumburk’ would be horrified…. How dare you.. lol.
The wages were good too back then,
15/- for a 6 mornings a week round, & ‘2-bob’ to watch Town ! Work it out, we were quids in compared to the situation now.
We used to use kinetic energy too ! (Later on in life)
knock it into neutral going downhill…
I’m no ‘scientist’, but we did seem to have more common sense back then.
Just asking,
How is burning Canadian ‘wood chips’ cheaper electricity, than burning coal from a (for instance) Selby/Castleford coal mine, that’s just about 10 miles away from the Power stations (of the time) ?
And people went to Universities, who ultimately made these present day changes & decisions ?????????
But. I guess that’s what COMMUNISTS do, spoil everything that’s good .
Greta thunfish + Luisa Neubauer (newrothschild)
are Rothschild agents for his klimate business
@ Yukon Jack
Your summation to debunk Anthropogenic Global Warming is excellent. I completely agree with it.
The Expose article gave me a new word, agnotology, which is defined as “the study of how ignorance arises via circulation of misinformation calculated to mislead.” The globalists are well versed in agnotology and have even managed to accuse their opponents of spreading misinformation when they are the primary misinformers.