Above, Karl-Liebknecht-Haus, the historical seat of the Communist Party of Germany and Antifaschistische Aktion, with prominently displayed its logo

Ian Fantom — Dec 22, 2022

Contents

• Cancelling the Culture
• The mob strikes again
• We are Governed by Mob Rule
• Social disintegration
• Year-End Review – in Speech and Song
• The Horrors
• The Cat is now out of the Bag
• Even the Phlegmatic Brits are Worried
• Thanks, Cancel Culture Mob!

I listened to the second in a series of Reith Lectures on BBC Radio on ‘The Four Freedoms‘. This one was given by Rowan Williams, the previous Archbishop of Canterbury, first broadcast on 7 December (though I heard it later on the BBC World Service from 4am). In that lecture he stated:

… we have learned our convictions through history. We can’t appeal with any credibility to natural and indisputable evidence. A huge range of cultural factors and conflicts has brought us to the positions we hold, and many of those factors are based at best pretty loosely on consistent argument.

If he’s talking about social values, then I agree with that, but if he is talking about religious convictions, then his idea of religion is different from mine. I am a Christian fundamentalist. When I was twelve I decided that if ever I should be converted to Christianity I would not join the Church of England, because it was founded by a murderer. For me, the intervening centuries were irrelevant, because I look for the fundamental principles on which any organisation is based. The same applies to Christianity itself, which was founded a century after the crucifixion, on the basis of untraceable documents. Jesus was a Jew, and according to Christians, the Jews are the chosen people. That places Christianity firmly in the terrain of Judaism, just as what is nowadays known as Judaism, which arose in its present form around the same time. Yet Christianity in its present form was defined by the Romans at the First Council of Nicaea in the year 325, when they decided what everyone should believe, and banished those on the Council who didn’t sign up to it to the Eastern Adriatic area. So right from the beginning there arose a question of freedom to worship at the heart of Western Christianity.

The idea of the three-in-one strikes me as a typical attempt by the Romans to reinterpret local religions in terms of Roman religions, in order to diffuse them and to control the people. Another sign of political motivation was the blaming of ‘the Jews’ for the crucifixion of Jesus. They could hardly accept responsibility themselves for that, and so had to blame others. Yet to believe that, one would also have to believe that they had a fleet of racing donkeys in Jerusalem, which they must have sent out carrying couriers to all parts of Judea, in order to consult with the population, and report back in time for the trial. I should have thought it would have been far more likely that the Jews calling out for Jesus’s crucifixion, if indeed that really did happen, would have been those linked to the Temple, which Jesus – and I should have thought with others, such as the disciples – had just stormed. This contradiction in the relationship between the Christian churches and ‘the Jews’, runs throughout Chrisendom, because all the denominations originated with the Bible, as compiled at Nicaea.

I was never converted, and never joined the Church of England, but the Church of England forms part of the governance of our country, and so should be held to account by all they jointly rule over. A year ago our Keep Talking group was meeting at St Gabriel’s Halls in Pimlico, and some odd things were happening, resulting in our having to pay for an extra hour because some people had gone in early and held their own meeting there. A Keep Talking party – really a year-end social gathering in a pub – was cancelled by a bodyguard outside the pub, saying no-one was allowed in because of a terrorist incident. Yet no-one in the pub seemed to be aware of such an incident. Some time later the venue manager at St Gabriel’s Halls received an email claiming that our group was ‘antisemitic’, on the basis of lies. There was no due process as far as the church authorities were concerned. They made an excuse that they had changed their hiring policy and cancelled all future meetings by our group. Was this the freedom that they as a church and as an institution of state were supposed to be upholding? I spoke about that to the group in a ‘pre-talk‘ talk, and posted that on my Odysee video channel. Again, a quick search using a Google-derived search engine yielded nothing, but the Russian Yandex immediately gave my channel as number one retrieved item.

I will say, however, that a lot was said by Rowan Williams as Archbishop of Canterbury that I would agree with. “With remarkable speed, we are being committed to radical, long-term policies for which no one voted”, he wrote in The New Statesman in 2011. However, after his Reith Lecture, he answered one of the questions by saying, “I do actually believe that the Government of Ukraine is right to resist invasion, …, and I do believe that in a good deal of what I’ve been saying the defence of those who are vulnerable is something I’d want to see as fairly basic in the moral spectrum“. Yet he didn’t mention the rights of Ukrainians to resist the bombing of their homes since 2014 by the Kiev regime. Mind you, this was mild stuff compared with the fourth Reith lecture, ‘The Freedom From Fear’, which struck me as la crème de la crème of the BBC’s fear-mongering propaganda, plus an accusation that Putin had declared war on the West. It came from a lecturer at John Hopkins University, which was heavily involved in the Covid scam. The lecturer didn’t even sound like an academic.

Rowan Williams also suported a cancel-culture campaign to ban books by Holocaust historian David Irving from Manchester University’s library, yet I see that they do hold a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Should not academics have their right of freedom of speech, whether or not some in authority disagree with them? I still point to the hypocrisy of the Church of England. It seems to me now that Christianity itself was spread as a fake religion, but that it did carry with it the moral and social values that had been developed over the previous millenia. That is what some of us, believers and non-believers, are trying to hold on to.

Cancelling the Culture

The Pharaoh was asked how he had come to such almighty power. He replied, “No-one stopped me“. That is an anecdote from Hussain al-Amily‘s ‘The Book of Arabic Wisdom‘ . In his last years he attended our Keep Talking meetings whenever he could. And that bit of wisdom is valid today. No-one is stopping them. I came across a graphic in a social media post (difficult to retrace), which showed the House of Commons during nine serious debates, starting with the war in Afghanistan. Following those pictures were two pictures of sessions on MPs’ expenses and MPs’ pay. All sessions were sparsely attended, except for the last two, which were packed. That gives some indication of priorities, and it also gives some indication of how easy it must be for some small group to seize the initiative in most serious matters and steer the country in a direction very different from one that would be chosen by the silent majority.

Al Jazeera has just broadcast a series of programmes under the title ‘The Labour Files’, showing how Jeremy Corbyn was ousted from the leadership of the Labour Party by a group within the Parliamentary Labour Party. At the time various friends of mine were saying that he should have stood his ground better. I was quite sympathetic, but I would point out that I didn’t really know, because I didn’t know what pressures he was under. I had in mind Michael Meacher MP, who had announced a showing of the film ‘Zero: An investigation into 9/11‘, but at the last moment withdrew it, saying that it would be too dangerous. He carried on talking about 9/11, and a few years later died suddenly. Whatever the circumstances, there seemed to be no explanation coming from the legacy media.

But it’s not just about the internal threats and the intimidation. If I had been in his position I would have been well aware of the fact that if I were to be singled out by a defamatory mob, I could expect no support from my friends and colleagues. Some might express sympathy privately, but standing up for the victim of such treatment publicly would be a different matter. There may have been one or two members of the Parliamentary Labour Party standing up for him, but I don’t remember any. I do remember the association ‘Labour Against the Witch-Hunt’, which subsequently expelled trades unionist Peter Gregson for linking to an article of mine, in which I had linked to an article of Nick Kollerstrom’s, in explaining the origins of Keep Talking, and how I came to defending Nick against what I am convinced was controlled opposition; the Reinvestigate 9/11 group were proposing a general boycott over Nick. I had known nothing about the Holocaust issue, and that was clearly only an excuse; they were trying to silence him over his book Terror on The Tube. So Peter Gregson was expelled for that! And an appeal to an Honorary President of Labour Against the Witch-Hunt, Noam Chomsky, fell on deaf ears. To me it seems that that organisation was controlled opposition, too. But where were the individual MPs who should have been standing up for Jeremy Corbyn at Labour Party meetings and in the Commons? The Usurpers gained their control of the Labour Party because no-one stopped them.

In 2014, long before anyone had any idea that Jeremy Corbyn would eventually become leader of the Labour Party – and that prospect would have seemed very remote – I gave him a copy of my twelve research reports on how something similar had happened in Esperanto Association of Britain, before they mobbed me at their 2006 Annual General Meeting. Jeremy Corbyn had at one stage been Secretary of the Esperanto Parliamentary Group, and so he was especially interested, from the moment I had introduced myself as having been behind the setting up of that group in 1972. I had handed him the reports in case such a situation should arise in his circles, too. It did.

And something similar had happened to Prime Minister Harold Wilson, who was constantly under pressure from the legacy media, at the instigation of MI5, as revealed thirty years later by a BBC documentary, and also and by the former assistant director of MI5, Peter Wright, in his book SpyCatcher. I have to wonder what the links may be behind the mob within the current Labour Party and the MI5 people who were bringing down Harold Wilson. MI5 more-or-less controlled The Communist Party of Great Britain, too. In 2008 I read in The Daily Telegraph a long and glowing obituary of Julie Pirie, who had worked under the Party secretary for twenty years, retiring in 1978. This covered the period of a campaign to bring down the President of the Universal Esperanto Association, Professor Ivo Lapenna of the London School of Economics and Political Science, led by Professor Humphrey Tonkin, a family friend and supporter of George Soros. Lapenna attributed this to the Communists, and I now think he was right, but not the Moscow Communists: the M15 and other Communists. Where does that lead us regarding the current Cancel Culture Mob? Who is paying key people? I’ll leave that one to the reader, but bear in mind that one revelation from Wikileaks was a secret donation by George Soros’s Open Society Foundation to one of the Cancel Culture Mob groups: Hope not Hate.

Yet the public is remarkably tolerant regarding such tyrannical interventions, generally attributing such behaviour to ‘psychology’. The psychology profession itself should bear much of the responsibility for this, because of the misleading propaganda they have been putting about about ‘conspiracy theories’.

The mob strikes again

In organising the monthly meetings of Keep Talking, I am constantly aware of these aspects of human nature. When things go well, people will express their gratitude, but when things go wrong the organiser will always carry the can. If he or the group is set upon by a lynch mob, then he will be alone. Public support will evaporate. This is quite clearly an aspect of human nature; animal behaviour takes over from cerebral analyis. And so it was recently, when we had to cancel our December meeting because of harrassment of the staff at the Tea House Theatre. We changed the nature of the event, and the mob were still making their ugly noises. We cancelled completely, and still they were threatening to go ahead, with the objective of closing down the Tea House Theatre. Their tweets were vicious. After the non-event, they issued a benign-looking photo of eight of them standing innocently, as if they were some Sunday School outing.

And who will speak out publicly to defend us? Virtually no-one. I wrote this up the evening before the non-event, and it was published the following morning in The Truthseeker.

Our event was to have been a Year-End Review in Speech and Song. Apparently, as I state in my article, I had been giving a series of secret talks on Holocaust Denial, which was so secret that even I didn’t know about them. The Cancel Culture Mob has been rampaging in various places, closing meetings down, labeling them as ‘Fascist’, and finding any excuse to do so, when the only thing in common with these events was that people involved had at some stage expressed views that would have been treated with disdain by the Establishment. We’ve experienced such behaviour before. The first time was a vicious-looking mob outside Diorama, in Drummond Street, involving Antifa, Hope not Hate and, believe it or not, the RMT transport union, which is has been recently causing disruption on the national railways in Britain. One of the Black Bloc threw an elderly colleague of mine to the ground, and a nearby police officer took no action. They had a big RMT flag there, held by their boss’s deputy, the so-called ‘moderate’, Steve Hedley. I wrote to the union, asking whether they would dissociate themselves from that, but they wouldn’t. The RMT, led by Mick Lynch, should therefore be held responsible. I think they are a load of bully boys, whatever their case in the current dispute.

Subsequently, until now, all that was necessary to get us boycotted by all venues we subsequently met at was a letter to their managers accusing us of antisemitism. I give no prizes for guessing who could be behind such a campaign. The Church of England would immediately concede on all occasions, including one where we had hired a church hall, held our meeting with full cooperation of the staff, with a crowded hall, addressed by an Israeli Jew and former Zionist. The church was subsequently approached by the Zionist lobby, accusing the speaker of being antisemitic, and demanding an immediate apology to the local Jewish community – as if they represented ‘the Jews‘. The church immediately complied, and at our expense. The Cancel Culture Mob even published a photo of one of them standing guard outside the church venue with an Israeli flag. Where is that coming from, and why is no-one standing up to the intimidation? Would Jesus have conceded, at someone else’s expense? Who actually runs the Church of England?

Antifa originated in Germany in 1932 as Antifaschistische Aktion, instigated by the Communist Party of Germany. Their main target was the Social Democratic Party, and they collaborated with the National Socialist Party in bringing down the Weimar Republic. They were revived at the end of the Second World War, and flourished in East Germany, where they regarded themselves also as anti-Zionist. What irony!

I have to wonder how violent they may become as they remain virtually unchallenged. Recently, according to Gateway Pundit in the United States, “Five Antifa members were arrested and held on terrorism charges after protesting outside of a $90 Million police training center near Atlanta, Georgia. The Antifa protesters torched at least two vehicles during their protests at the training center site“. They also say: “Police recovered bombs, flares, gasoline, and weapons during the arrest“. Some of the comments below the report are interesting. ‘Sir Keks’ wrote: “The original ANTIFA in America was founded by the same group that led Bolshevism in Russia. The reason ANTIFA and BLM win is because they have the backing of the system. Who controls the media and give the Democrat party over 50% of its funding just like they funded/led Bolshevism? … What was done with violence to destroy Russia is done with subversion to destroy historic America. This group led every subversive ‘leftist’ movement in America …“.

We are Governed by Mob Rule

Britain, or at least England, is run by Mob Rule. The Cancel Culture Mob, in various forms, seems to be in control from the grass roots of society right up to Parliament and international institutions.

I broke off from writing this newsletter for lunch, and on the telly was a desperate fight between a wildebeest [a gnu] and three cheetahs. The rest of the herd stood by, watching intensely, but doing nothing. If they had all charged together they would easily have sent the cheetahs running off. It’s noticable that some hunting animals are capable of strategic thinking and co-ordinated attack, whereas the grazing animals just stand by as one of their number is targeted. When humans are attacking they generally do so in a strategic manner, but when under attack they behave just as grazing animals do, when they would clearly have the ability to see off their attackers. At least, in the case of the wildebeest they stood in a defensive line, so that if the one under attack managed to get away, the cheetahs wouldn’t go after the herd. And that is exactly how it turned out. Humans don’t even do that, unless they are organised by their leaders, and defence is turned into attack. If those wildebeest had had the human mentality some of them would have broken out into scuffles rather than maintaining a solid front.

Socialists, for instance, have the concept of ‘solidarity’, a word that is never far from their lips. In theory, if one of their mates is victimised by an employer they will stand up for them. In practice, they will only stand up for them if they are told to by their union bosses; otherwise they will ignore the plight of the victim.

When put under stress, humans will revert to instinct. I first experienced this in the 2006 Annual General Meeting of the Esperanto association, when I was targeted by the Cancel Culture Mob, which in that case was led by a university professor and a former high-ranking civil servant, both of whom had attended private boarding schools. What matters is authority times numbers, and logic plays no part in this. It’s the same in any group, including groups in the truth movement.

GBNews presenter Neil Oliver is getting quite a reputation for his brilliant monologues about the abuse of power by those who rule over us. He really has a way with words, too, and his content is far more scathing than anything I have heard from socialist firebrands, who, according to George Orwell, would spew out words like a squid spews out ink. Yet Neil Oliver regards himself as ‘conservative’, as does the GBNews channel itself. In one monologue he queried what would happen if the public were to get together and refuse to comply. He’s only been a ‘dissident’ since around the time the Covid con began, and he’s been learning fast. Previously he had been a very successful and entertaining presenter of historical and archeological programmes on the BBC. I can give him the answer to his question: In order to get general co-ordinated action by the public we would first have to open people’s eyes as to what is actually happening, and if that were to happen, there would be no need for co-ordinated action. It would be so obvious that a general takeover of power is taking place, and a sort of self-organisation of individuals and small groups would begin. Yet in an interview with another GBNews presenter he made the point that people don’t seem to care. I see that as being the main obstacle to be overcome, as I think he does, too. His own presentation is from 6pm on Saturdays.

Social disintegration

If any group is trying to take control of a country, they will if possible start by undermining the fabric of society. “Lenin’s theory of change was a theory of social disruption, of imposing a shift so radical that a society could not go back to the way it had been. Such disruptions don’t just happen randomly. There is a set of conditions required to launch them, and there are particular circumstances in which the initiators of the disruption tend to succeed in their aims“, wrote historian Professor David Potter.

A book review appearing in The Times Literary Supplement in December 2017 was headed ‘A terribly Russian riot: The catastrophic disintegration of Russia’s social fabric during the Russian revolution‘. I feel sure that some of this was in fact organised, because the pogroms following the assassination of Alexandr II were instigated by a group very similar to today’s Cancel Culture Mob in the UK. It now seems to be generally accepted that the Russian Revolution was largely a Jewish revolution. I personally think that the Russian Jews were thus being exploited by a banking elite that had taken over their leadership. History is repeating itself; this time it’s happening primarily in the NATO countries. This should surprise no-one who understands that the Bolsheviks were funded by New York bankers.

‘Is the fabric of society being undermined by mRNA vaccination?‘, asked physicist Dr. Guy Hatchard on 1 October 2022, in Exposé News. “Are we in fact intimately connected with our peers through a genetic web, like trees in a forest connected through their root systems?” he asked, quoting from a book on ‘The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate’. Yes, I had learned a bit about that when I observed in the woodland around our house how beech trees will remain quite small, until a gap appears above, when they will suddenly arise, and eventually dominate the woodland. That’s a strategy the truth movement should be adopting. Now that I have come out on that issue, perhaps I can expect Antifa to call me an antisemitic conspiracy theorist and fascist. Are the beech trees in a huge conspiracy? I doubt it. And I doubt that there is any huge conspiracy amongst humans, either; there is just a small conspiracy amongst some all-powerful people.

“Has the deliberate editing of fundamental epigenetic processes, as happens through mRNA vaccination, precipitated a new world order of confusion?“, Dr. Guy Hatchard asks. I began to think along similar lines when I heard about exosomes and herd immunity. What appears to be happening with humans is the same sort of thing that is happening in our woodlands, amongst our insects and probably all forms of life.

“It took the Nazi regime years of propaganda to condition the German public to accept their level of cruelty. The cruelty and careless disregard of pandemic policy happened almost overnight. Families were sundered, information hidden, scapegoats blamed, and overbearing power exercised almost instantly“, he commented. I was saying fifty years ago that anyone starting on sociological research should first get a degree in Physics, and now I find that that was a lot closer to the literal truth than I had imagined at the time.

But actually, the disintegration in the fabric of our society has been going on in an organised way for a long time. I’ve written a lot elsewhere about my own experiences and observations over the past fifty years. In the early years I was seeing the symptoms, but not understanding how they were all linked, and where they were coming from. Demonstrating these symptoms in speech and song was my primary purpose in the presentation planned for 8 December 2022, because although most of our people think they can recognise ‘shills’ when they come across them, and many are absolutely certain that some people are not ‘shills’ because they have known them for many years, they are basing their views on unrealistic preconceptions. Eventually we cancelled the whole meeting, but the Cancel Culture Mob still turned up, as I said, looking like a Sunday School outing.

Year-End Review – in Speech and Song

My part of the Year-End Review, apart from having written half of the songs, was to have included a short review of the horrors experienced by millions of people and successes in exposing the fraud that has led to that. I had started the year with a newsletter, published in The Truthseeker on 8 January, 2022, headed ‘The Backlash: Make or Break in 2022?‘. Yes, indeed, the break-through seems to have begun in ernest, but at a horrific cost.

I had drafted out my introductory talk for the Year-End Review in Speech and Song, starting off by welcoming back Alison Chabloz, whom I was to describe as “the greatest singer of satirical songs since Millicent Martin in the 1960s”. She hadn’t actually sung at a Royal Command Performance, but did serve some time at the Queen’s Pleasure for singing some songs which reexpressed what others had expressed in speech. Looking back at my notes for the presentation, I’ll explain.

Do you remember the case of Walter Wolfgang? He was arrested in 2005 under the 2000 Terrorism Act, section 44, for calling out “Nonsense“, when Home Secretary Jack Straw was justifying the invasion of Iraq? “In ten years they‘ll be coming for YOU just like Walter“, wrote Peter Hitchens in Mail Online. Shortly afterwards, during a speech by Jack Straw, a barbershop choir arose, singing “Nonsense“. The point was that they couldn’t be arrested for singing, but they could for speaking.

But now, over a decade later, you can be arrested for singing what other people have said. Alison’s case proves this point. Her two main songs in question were about two Jewish witnesses to Nazi atrocities in the film ‘The Last Days‘ by Steven Spielberg. Doubts had been being expressed as to their reliability in a documentary ‘The Last Days of the Big Lie‘ by Ben Hunt. In short, their testamonies did not sound credible. The Campaign Against Antisemitism pressed the police to prosecute, and that took a while. I presume it would have taken some time to identify a judge who might be willing to bend the law in order to send her down. The law is an ass, they say, but it becomes especially dangerous when some people feed and encourage the ass. Of course, it’s stuff and nonsense, and it evolved just as Peter Hitchens had predicted.

The weekend before the presentation was due I wrote another song; this one was telling the above story. Just as I was breaking off from writing the final verse to head off for an appointment the venue manager phoned and told me about a particularly vicious twitterstorm. We had had experience of the Cancel Culture Mob several years ago, pulling grimacing faces through the glass at Diorama in Drummond Street in the Euston area, at least by some of those who weren’t covering their faces as part of the so-called Black Bloc. When I heard that the small staff at the Tea House Theatre were being harrassed, I felt I had a moral duty to agree to that event, in that form at least, being cancelled. The venue has prided itself as a bastion of free speech, and they had fended off menacing letters about our group since we moved there earlier in the year. I was very grateful for that, and I felt I had a duty to bend to their wishes in this situation, and that the staff had rights of freedom of speech, and work, too, without being harrassed by any mob.

I didn’t know at that stage what would replace that event, but I saw this cancellation as a strategic retrenchment. It doesn’t mean that I had bowed to the Cancel Culture Lobby, but that I would seek to capitalise on that disgraceful incident in establishing a similar event somewhere, somewhen. The objective of fighting any battle is to come out of it in a stronger position than would have been the case if that battle had not been fought. Why go straight into a route on the enemy’s turf, when you have a reasonable chance to pick your own turf and beat these powerful wimps? I was working on that, but the main problem preventing any immediate progress was due to the quarreling which ensued. “With friends like Ian Fantom, who needs enemies?” one person was reported to have replied, but I don’t know what he was replying to. It’s been like listening to the BBC about to all the outrageous things Trump and Putin are said to have said, with no context, as if we’ve been listening to one end of a telephone conversation, and from that judging the guy at the other end. People need to calm down and think strategically, a problem I have been struggling with for years.

I was to have started off with a 20 minute review of the year, which has seen a massive breakthrough on the health and vaccine front. This is the only dissident movement I’m aware of which has been led by scientists and medical people. Last Summer there were protest marches in central London every week, with up to a million people, and virtually ignored by the press. I think back to our tiny demonstrations of 2007 and 2008, drawing attention to the impossibilities of what we were told about 9/11, with perhaps 20 to 30 of us. In Trafalgar Square, on our way to Whitehall, I said to MI5 dissident Annie Machon, that we won’t make a breakthrough until we can put some humour into this, but 9/11 was so grim that that would be difficult. “Yes“, she replied. Now there are masses of Samizdat-style humour over the vaccine scam. As Stalin said, one death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.

It is a sad reflection on human nature that that is what it has taken to bring people together on a large scale. It is also a measure of how successful the techniques of brainwashing have been – at all levels in society. I didn’t propose to go into the details of such horrors that evening, since it was supposed to be a little more social, relaxing and entertaining than usual. The main message I wanted to get across was the importance of the arts in relaxing the mind, and having a break every day from the stresses of researching and following such horrors. I have been dealing with some people for years who appear to have gone into a state of chronic anxiety, not necessarily because their neurology or psychology is prone to that, but because they have the intelligence to figure out the corruption and the zombie-like behaviour of the minions surrounding them. One such person has just told me, “I’m not stupid“. I replied, “It might help if you were“. I have just read that in a German study researchers found people producing art demonstrated increased interactivity between the frontal and parietal cortices of the brain. The frontal lobe is where reasoning takes place, and the parietal lobe near the back connects various other parts of the brain. The review states: “This increased brain connectivity translates to enhanced psychological resilience in the group of art producers. In other words, their ability to resist the negative effects of stress improved“. This is exactly what I had been finding when I would turn away from the screen and turn off analytical thinking whilst improvising at the piano. In music terms, my subconscious turned out to be cleverer than I am.

Another reason for relaxing the mind is that only then does the penny drop. Any computer programmer will have experienced working hard to fix a bug, and finding that the solution just comes to him as he is quietly walking home. That’s how it was for me thirty-odd years ago. December has been a good month for pennies to drop. It was in December 2004 that I realised there was something dramatically wrong with my supposed friends in the Esperanto association, which led me to entering their management committee to find out what was going on. It was the following December when I realised that out of all the minuted items I had logged, in which the claim was made that their capital reserves were being eaten up, never ever were any figures cited. That led to my financial report to the President, merely drawing his attention to this, and giving my own calculations from the annual financial reports, where those figures should have been present, but weren’t. It was in December the following year that I contacted David Shayler to ask him whether MI5 had penetrated the Esperanto movement, and in doing so, I discovered the literature on 9/11 and the inconsistencies in the governments’ claims on that. That was my strategic thinking behind organising such an evening; I wanted people to think, to socialise, to understand what to look for in possible infiltration, and to keep talking. And now, in December 2022, the penny dropped on Antifa and its links to the Stalinist Communists and the Nazis.

The horrors

I wasn’t proposing to go into too much detail that evening on the horrors coming to light over the years. Documentaries have been appearing bringing together the horrors resulting from mRNA technology, as applied to humans. Initially, mRNA came with a health warning from the developers: Not for application to humans. A film ‘Died Suddenly‘ was recently released, and it showed some statistics and catalogued cases of sportsmen and others suddenly dropping down. It showed the discoveries of embalmers finding long strings of some rubbery substance in the blood vessels of some of the people they were embalming.

There’s also a been a documentary series ‘The Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal‘, in which Part 26 deals with ‘Wrapping up Genocide’. Robert Kennedy‘s book ‘The Real Anthony Fauci‘ has been turned into a commercial movie. The trailer is available for view.

I wrote in my January article ‘The Backlash: Make or Break in 2022?‘: “I’ve been trying to finish off an article for the past few weeks, but developments are hitting us so fast now that it’s practically impossible to finish off anything without having to break off to deal with the latest breakthrough, or the ludicrosity in the present situation in which we find ourselves“. Well the situation got even more hectic. I would have had enough material each day for one of these newsletters, but I didn’t even have the time to read everything and watch all the videos.

For anyone who wishes to follow the issues on a day-to-day basis, there is The Daily Sceptic, which I find honest and straight-forward. There are also various groups, such as The Free Speech Union. I also found video interviews in the Rights2Freedom Bitchute channel.

The Vaccine Injured and Bereaved U.K. (VIBUK) is asking people who have suffered from the vaccine to contact them with a view to getting reasonable compensation. And there is a lot of material on the website of the Stiftung Corona Ausschuss [Corona Investigative Committee] run by lawyer Reiner Fuellmich.

A website ‘Vaccine Impact‘ summarises the mRNA casualties, giving links to offical sources. They cite 75 000 dead and 6 million injured in the EU and US. Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil has been circulating information from the British Medical Journal and The Lancet saying that the National Health Service waiting list now stands at ten million.

At the centre of all of this is the World Ecomonic Forum, which meets in Davos. “The future is built by us“ – said Klaus Schwab at their annual meeting in 2022. At least he admits it. The Youtube video was withdrawn between me writing this up and compiling the references list, but it has appeared elsewhere, such as in Breitbart. In Rebel News it became clear that that included the war in Ukraine, too. A fuller excerpt is: “Political, economic, social and ecological dimensions of every issue today are intertwined… the future is not just happening, the future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in this room”.

The Cat is now out of the Bag

A remarkable event took place in the European Parliament on 10 October, when Dutch MEP Rob Roos put a question to a Pfizer representative at the parliamentary session. He showed the exchange in a video, which he introduced by saying:

If you don’t get vaccinated, you’re anti-social. This is what the Dutch Prime Minister, and Health Minister, told us. You don’t get vaccinated just for yourself, but also for others. You do it for all of society. That’s what they said. Today, this turns out to be complete nonsense. In a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, one of the Pfizer directors just admitted to me, at the time of the introduction, the vaccine had never been tested on stopping the transmission of the virus. This removes the entire legal basis for the Covid passport. The Covid passport that led to massive institutional discrimination, as people lost access to essential parts of society. I find this to be shocking – even criminal. Please watch the video until the end.

Pfizer representative Janine Small replied: “No [chuckles in embarassment] These, erm, you know we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market“. Rob Roos commented: “This is scandalous. Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that ‘you do it for others’. Now, this turned out to be a cheap lie. This should be exposed“.

On 19 October German MEP Christine Anderson told the European Parliament‘s Covid Committee:

Put in a nutshell, the cat is out of the bag. It was a gigantic lie, what they told us – that these vaccines would prevent you catching this virus or would prevent transmission. …

Christine Anderson continued:

I would like to point out a couple of things from the EU Commission’s Action Plan ‘EU Commission response to Covid-19 Preparing for Autumn, Winter 2023’. As you might have guessed, the focus of course is on these hazardous mRNA injections. …

They would like to increase vaccine confidence by debunking mis- and dis-information. Well, who is spreading the mis- and the dis-information? It is EU Commission, it is the pharmaceutical companies, it is governments, especially in the Western democracies. They are the ones spreading the mis- and the dis-information. They are the ones telling people lies. For what? So the pharaceutical companies make profits and profits and profits. And the risks?

Two days later Italian MEP Francesca Donato called for the resignation of the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, saying that money from the Italian PNNR fund was going to multinational pharmaceutical companies, which were profiting by billions of Euros, arranged by secret negotiations with the President of the European Commission, whose husband was a medical director in one company which would profit from that.

Even the Phlegmatic Brits are Worried

A petition to the Westminster parliament ran:

There has been a significant increase in heart attacks and related health issues since the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines began in 2021. This needs immediate and full scientific investigation to establish if there is any possible link with the Covid-19 vaccination rollout.

It is the duty of the Government to ensure that the prescribed medical interventions of its response to Coronavirus are safe. We believe that the recent and increasing volume of data relating to cardiovascular problems since the Covid-19 vaccine rollout began is of enough concern to warrant a full Public Inquiry.

That petition was signed by over a hundred thousand people, and by law had to be debated in parliament. That debate took place on 24 October, 2022, but it was a very British debate. It took place not in the House of Commons chamber, but in a meeting room in the parliament buildings. The petition was introduced by a pro-government opponent of the petition, and the motion put forward was “That this House has considered e-petition 602171, relating to the safety of covid-19 vaccines“. Unsurprisingly, at the end they all voted in favour of that motion. The spokesman named those who had written to him about their safety concerns regarding the vaccines ‘antivaxers’, adding that some of them were ‘climate deniers’, and that he tended to ignore them.

The chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Covid-19 Vaccine Damage. Sir Christopher Chope, pointed out that the regulating authority, MHRA, was financed by the pharmaceutical industry, which produces and markets the vaccines which it regulates. The deflections of the pro-government people in that debate would infuriate any reasonably logical mind. The government spokesperson reiterated the government’s case, without regard to previous objections, as if she hadn’t been listening. This session brought to my mind an academic paper on psychiatry titled ‘On Being Sane in Insane Places‘ in the journal Science. The abstract began: “It is clear that we cannot distinguish the sane from the insane in psychiatric hospitals“. That paper caused a major upset in the psychiatric profession when it appeared in 1973, resulting in a decision by the profession to treat rather than to diagnose. Imagine being told by a garage that they cannot diagnose the problem, but will just mend the car! And now the legacy media are regularly reporting that there has been a rise in ‘mental illness’, as if that were the fault of the patients rather than those people in positions of power who were behaving in such an infuriating way. I think that what was written in that paper now applies to the whole country, and probably to the whole of the English-speaking world.

Summing up the debate, Sir Christopher Chope stated:

There was also the widespread claim that the vaccine stops transmission, so people should take the jab to protect other people. We were all told that; we all believed that for many months. Last month, we heard from Pfizer that its vaccine was never tested to see whether it would stop transmission. Despite that, we had the notorious claim by Professor Chris Whitty that even though the vaccine brought no benefit to children, children should be vaccinated to protect wider society. I am all for thinking about society, not the individual, but that, again, feels like a profound break with medical ethics. A lot of people are asking what the vaccine does to children and young people, and Professor Whitty is right that the benefit to healthy children seems to be essentially nil.

This brings us back to the same issue as the one discussed by MEPs, and one can see from this how British propaganda is the best in the world.

Sir Christopher Chope referred to the public enquiry under Lady Hallett, saying that that would take years. I can add that Lady Hallett led the ‘inquiry’ into the terrorist attacks in the London transport system of 7 July, 2005, and ignored quite basic facts, like the fact that the named culprits would have missed their own suicides, because the train that the government told us they had caught to London had been cancelled that day. It is well-known that public inquiries provide a means of avoiding public scrutiny and legal proceedings.

And in a sparsely attended session in the House of Commons on 13 December, headed ‘Vaccines: Potential Harms’, Andrew Bridgen, who had taken part in the previous debate, quoted from a peer reviewed paper by Dr Aseem Malhotra a description of the current situation: “perhaps the greatest miscarriage of medical science, attack on democracy, damage to population health, and erosion of trust in medicine that we will witness in our lifetime”. He also quoted the former editor of The British Medical Journal, Richard Smith, who had claimed that research misconduct was rife and was not effectively being tackled in the UK institutions, stating: “Something is rotten in…British medicine and has been for a long time”, a conclusion that I had reached in my early researches into Covid, and reported on in April 2020 under the title ‘Science, Fake Science and Political Science‘, and wrote about more pointedly in November 2021 under the title ‘Will NEJM now withdraw the Pfizer Vaccine Trial paper?‘. Yet nothing is done in parliament. The motion before parliament, by the way, was “That this House do now adjourn“. That’s not a joke. It means that the government’s response, as given on the petition web page, namely, “This topic was debated on 24 October 2022“, was untrue. They had not debated the topic, but merely given it consideration.

Even as I was compiling the reference list for this newsletter Neil Oliver gave another brilliant monologue on 16 December, based essentially on Andrew Bridgen’s speech in the Commons, even making the point that the chamber was sparsely attented. I would be wondering whether he had read my newsletter if I’d already sent it out.

Thanks, Cancel Culture Mob!

I realised at the time of the Partygate scandal that if politicians themselves were partying when they were telling the public that there would be a mortal danger in doing likewise, then they could not themselves believe their own words. Now French MP Jean Lassalles has spoken out, saying that Macron and most of his cabinet did not get vaccinated; they only pretended to. He had doubts about politicians in some other countries, too, including Boris Johnson. I did wonder at the time.

The UK government has been putting up fierce resistance to complying with a Freedom of Information request from Open Democracy to reveal ‘lessons learned‘ documents, according to Open Democracy.

So what have the Cancel Culture Mob gained in getting our meeting closed down? I’ve given more detail here, and to more people, than I would have done at any meeting of perhaps 60 people. I wasn’t going to go into much detail at that meeting,. The main point was about how to handle opposition coming from both outside and within, and how to keep calm through the arts. Any group such as ours will be infiltrated, and subject to the same sort of personal undermining. Most of the leadership of the UK’s Freedom Alliance have just resigned, they say because of personal attacks, and lack of support from colleagues, though that could just be another coup, providing an excuse for others to come in and close the party down. For me, it was an expectation that such things would happen when we set up Keep Talking in 2010, and my strategy has kept us going ever since. When a few days after having written the above I tried to access their website again, I found it had been taken down and parked by123 Reg, and that their email address was no longer valid.

The idea of presenting our songs has been undermined, but I hope not irreparably and, thanks to the free publicity provided by the Cancel Culture Mob, to much wider audiences. I’d love to see Alison Chabloz singing on GBNews some day. If we can behave more like the wildebeest against the cheetahs, then we’ll start to win, even if we don’t all charge together.

 

Ian Fantom 2022-12-22