Above: Vincent Reynouard consulting his lawyer during one of his many court appearances in France. In the background can be seen one of Vincent’s most loyal supporters, Jérôme Bourbon, the editor of long-established journal Rivarol.
Jailing Opinions – Nov 14, 2022
French revisionist scholar Vincent Reynouard was arrested in Scotland on Thursday 10th November. He is presently in an Edinburgh prison cell, awaiting a court hearing on 24th November to determine whether he should be extradited to France, where he would be jailed under that country’s laws restricting historical and scientific enquiry.
Vincent Reynouard built his scholarly reputation with a detailed re-examination of what had been termed the ‘Massacre of Oradour’, and went on to become one of the world’s leading sceptical investigators of the ‘Holocaust’. Francophone readers should visit his excellent website.
The front page of Scotland’s oldest newspaper (now owned by Americans) led with the Reynouard story on Tuesday 15th November. Contrary to the headline, there is no “anti-nazi law”: the French authorities are seeking Vincent Reynouard’s extradition under a law banning critical enquiry into ‘Holocaust’ history. No such law exists in the UK and it is shameful that Police Scotland collaborated in this arrest. Click to enlarge
British and American readers might be shocked that a specialist squad of police from SO15 – the Counter-Terrorism Command, directed from London – swooped on a small Scottish village to arrest this 53-year-old scholar, who is not accused of anything that would be a crime in the UK.
Yet in fact this is simply the latest example – though an especially important example – of an increasing trend across Europe, where politicised courts and prosecutors, aided by politicised police forces and intelligence agencies, are seeking to crush any dissent and enforce a quasi-religious obedience to one particular view of 20th century history.
The question that should immediately occur to any educated European is: why?
Why should our rulers be so afraid of what remains a small minority of scholars who – inspired by revisionist pioneers Robert Faurisson in France and Arthur Butz in the USA – have persisted in raising serious questions about the alleged murder of six million Jews, in unfeasible homicidal gas chambers, on the undocumented alleged orders of Adolf Hitler?
Any other area of history with such blatant evidential problems would have attracted dozens of academic sceptics. Yet with a handful of honourable exceptions, the academic world has not only been cowed into silence, but has queued up to accept lucrative commissions and tenured positions promoting the new religion of Holocaustianity.
Our rulers approach has been the well-tried one of ‘carrot and stick’.
The carrot is the promise of well-remunerated posts in universities and charities, combined with fat cheques from publishers, newspapers, television stations and movie studios.
The stick (increasingly used during the last quarter-century) has involved heavy fines and prison sentences. In Germany, the 94-year-old Ursula Haverbeck has been sentenced to another year in prison, and is expected to begin her incarceration any day now. Her equally courageous compatriot Horst Mahler (now 86) has at the last count spent about fifteen years in prison since his 70th birthday, again for the ‘crimes’ of publishing articles and books, and giving interviews about this forbidden area of 20th century history. And in the USA the exiled German chemist Germar Rudolf faces determined efforts to have him extradited to Germany, where he would certainly be handed a long jail sentence.
So far the UK has no such specific law criminalising historical revisionism, and several British historians, including leftists and liberals such as Timothy Garton Ash, have commendably condemned all such laws.
In 2008 a London court rejected the German government’s request for the extradition of Australian revisionist Dr Fredrick Töben under a European Arrest Warrant. Will a similar situation protect Vincent Reynouard?
New extradition arrangements post-Brexit have only been in force since 11 pm on 31st December 2020, so while we can see the statutory position, we have little in the way of case law (on either side of the border).
I am not a lawyer, but I was closely involved in research work for the Töben case, and have had good reason more recently to refresh my memory and understanding of the legal position regarding EU citizens travelling or resident in the UK.
Traditionally the UK’s position on extradition (as was once common internationally) was based on two essential principles. One was the existence of an extradition treaty with the country concerned, which entailed mutual respect for legal systems. For example, the lack of such a treaty with Spain (due to political embarrassment over the presence of numerous anti-Franco exiles, including terrorists, in the UK) meant that Spain became notorious for decades as a refuge for British criminals – i.e. non-political criminals such as bank robbers.
Once such a treaty was in place, the essential principle was ‘dual criminality’, i.e. that the offence of which the requested fugitive was charged should also be an offence in the country from which extradition was sought. Naturally the criminal laws involved would rarely be identical, and it was up to the courts to resolve whether ‘dual criminality’ applied.
In a case such as that of Vincent Reynouard, this would once have presented a problem for the authorities. It would have been necessary to prove not only that he had committed ‘Holocaust denial’ (not in itself of course an offence in the UK), but that he had done so in a manner which also contravened some UK law (such as the laws against “inciting racial hatred”).
As readers can easily imagine, the “dual criminality” requirement allowed legal loopholes to be exploited in any number of criminal cases, especially those which involved wealthy crooks, or IRA terrorists who had a well-funded support network, and whose extradition from European countries (or the USA) to the UK was occasionally blocked.
So even setting aside our enemies’ broader political agenda, there were (from the general public’s viewpoint) apparent practical advantages to the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) system, which after long discussion replaced the traditional extradition laws, and took effect in the UK on 1st January 2004.
Under the EAW there was a fundamental assumption that all legal systems within the EU could trust each other to respect natural justice, etc.; and there was no need to establish “dual criminality”.
In place of the latter principle, the EAW established a list of “framework offences”. Once it could be shown that a fugitive was accused of anything that fell within these quite broadly defined “framework offences”, he would be extradited very swiftly in what amounted to a “rubber-stamp” procedure even though it formally took place in court. There was no provision in most cases for the courts to investigate the full circumstances of the alleged ‘crime’ before extradition under an EAW.
This is Baroness Scotland, the ‘British’ government minister who gave Parliament an assurance that the European Arrest Warrant would not be used as a back-door criminalisation of ‘Holocaust denial’. If Vincent Reynouard is extradited, it will be clear evidence that she lied to Parliament.
One of the framework offences was “racism and xenophobia”. However, so far as ‘Holocaust denial’ was concerned, there remained a potential loophole.
This loophole only existed because of objections that were raised in the House of Lords during passage of the legislation that wrote the EAW system into UK law.
Under repeated cross-examination by peers, the Home Office minister in the Lords (Baroness Scotland) gave a specific assurance that the EAW would not amount to a back door criminalisation of Holocaust denial in the UK.
The position was to be as follows. If any element of the ‘offence’ of ‘Holocaust denial’ had taken place in the UK, it would be deemed to fall under UK law and therefore (unless it could be shown that it also involved other existing crimes under UK law) extradition would not take place.
A ‘Holocaust denier’ would only be extradited under a European Arrest Warrant if it could be shown by the requesting country’s authorities that the ‘crime’ had been committed purely and simply within the jurisdiction of the country concerned.
The specific example given to Parliament was of someone who had made a speech in Cologne market place denying the ‘Holocaust’, and had then escaped to the UK before being apprehended. In such a case (provided other boxes were ticked, such as the offence potentially attracting a prison sentence of more than 12 months) the requested person would be extradited.
However, if someone had produced a magazine, or a book, or a website, or an online video, etc., ‘denying the Holocaust’, then such a person would not be extradited. Even though part of the ‘offence’ might have been committed in France, Germany or wherever, part of it would also have been committed in the UK.
The minister’s precise words to Parliament included the following assurance:
“Holocaust denial …is a very particular offence. We would say that those engaging in that endeavour in part in this country would not be capable of being extradited as the offence would in part have allegedly been committed in this country, and in this country it is not an offence. So we would not extradite those involved in it.”
Such was the difficulty for the German authorities in the Töben case. They issued a European Arrest Warrant, and Töben was arrested while merely passing through London’s Heathrow Airport on 1st October 2008. He was jailed pending extradition, which at first was expected to be a ‘rubber-stamp’ process.
However, on closer examination (once Töben was represented by extradition specialist Kevin Lowry-Mullins rather than by a duty solicitor) it was found that the German request was insufficiently detailed. The reason for such vagueness was obvious: the authorities both in Berlin and London were well aware that Töben’s alleged criminal conduct did not fall within the very limited definition of ‘Holocaust denial crimes’ for which people could be extradited from the UK. To do so would be a flagrant betrayal of pledges to Parliament during passage of the EAW into UK law.
Consequently, the legal difficulty (and political embarrassment) was colossal. After the Westminster magistrate ruled against extradition, the British and German authorities swiftly dropped their appeal, resulting in Töben’s release.
So the question in 2022 becomes whether the new arrangements that have replaced the EAW post-Brexit, in relation to extradition from or to the UK, are in any way similar in their application to Vincent’s case.
These new laws were agreed as part of the ‘Trade and Cooperation Agreement’ between the UK and the EU which regulates the whole spectrum of such relations post-Brexit. It passed into UK law in the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020, which took effect at 11 pm on 31st December 2020.
Broadly speaking this replicates the EAW, in that it is intended to fast-track extradition (in each direction) between the UK and EU countries, and is similar to the existing arrangements that the EU has with Norway and Iceland.
Specifically, there are very limited grounds on which it will be possible to argue that Vincent should not be extradited, and there is a presumption that the whole procedure should be completed swiftly.
It is potentially important that the new law – unlike the EAW system – does not specifically state that the UK and EU nations have “mutual trust” and “mutual confidence” in one other’s legal systems.
Moreover it is stated in the new law that any extradition should be “proportionate” and in particular should avoid long periods of pre-trial detention.
One potential argument is that the French legal system is so heavily politicised in respect of thought-criminals (especially ‘Holocaust deniers’) that there are serious grounds for believing that Vincent Reynouard’s fundamental rights would be imperilled by extradition.
There will be extensive updates here at the Real History blog on the Vincent Reynouard case as it develops. And we shall very soon be reporting on a broader new initiative to advance revisionist scholarship with the aid of a new generation of European intellectual adventurers (to use Professor Robert Faurisson’s celebrated term).
For some considerable time i have worn a tee shirt with big letters
THE HOLOCAUST WAS FAKED
people smile and often comment they liked it
never once has anyone complained about it
i cant wait for when the bombings of synagogues begin
Fw: Watch “The Jewish company Nestle Baby Formula Scandal: The Darkest Chapter in Corporate History” on YouTube
https://youtu.be/v-PcOVl1K2g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGQq4SUIv0g
yes i know about nestle
also johnson and johnson putting aluminum and asbestos powder in baby products
George Soros and Sheldon Adelson have been exposed by back leader Wayne Dobbs
as funneling money into the BLM solely to attack white people
Moishe Solomons said on radio that it was the triumph of the jew in 2 world wars to set
the 2 white anglo saxon nations at each others throats.
At the end of w w 2 when all german men were either killed or incarcerated
the USAF would instigate 1000 bomber raids on the rubble of german cities
an hour later another wave would come by when german women had left the cellars to help,
and the helpers would then be bombed, the RAF would come in at night also fire bombing the ruins, women were a special target as they produced german children
The russian armies came into germany with the orders to gang rape
every german woman between the ages of 8 and 80, to leave them with mixed race babies.
Moishe Solomons said the plan for the UK was more gentle, he said dumb down the women
and flood the country with blacks and browns, make adverts to brain wash white women
to prefer black men and mixed colour babies and let time do the rest, the goal is to
extinguish white people.
Hollywood has in every film the bad guy as an englishman , these subliminals go into the subconscious and change people, the jews want no more white people by 2030
the History” on YouTube
https://youtu.be/v-PcOVl1K2g
The Bee-Gees singer Robin Gibb was the main voice to have a statue commemorating
The actions of men of the British R.A.F in World war two. Robin campaigned for public money and donations despite being a multi millionaire himself.
Robin died in 2012, his Roadies were on Radio shortly after and said Robin boasted of sleeping with 1000 boys
one wonders how many he infected with the AIDS he died from.
The common enemy in the 1930s of Britain and Germany was Bolshevik Russia, and the Treaty Between Adolf Hitler and Neville Chamberlian, was against soviet Agression, but Neville Chamberlian whose death certificate says Bowel Cancer with a question mark, was said by insiders to have been slowly poisoned on the orders of Winston Churchill, he was murdered to get Winston in for another nice world war.
Chamberlians secretary Archibald Maule-Ramsey was put in prison for exposing the truth of all this in his book
“The Needles war” This is online and makes great reading.
Sir Anthony Blunt the pervert and Soviet spy, said on record quote. “Churchill said the war will be over by Christmas join quick to give Hitler bloody nose, Blunt went on, that the R.A.F. attracted all the upper class snobs the Hooray-Henrys, and Poles and Czechs who spoke no English and did not have a clue what was being said
he claimed the RAF on being sent to bomb Germany found the military cities were protected by anti aircraft guns, so many were turning round dropping their bombs in the sea and returning home, that Rothschild told Lord Lindemans who was the cut out man between Rothschild and his puppet Churchill, to leave the protected areas and concentrate on the dormitory towns where the wives and children of the soldiers lived,
plus Rothschild wanted the factores left intact to seize them after the war in reparations.
Churchill said of this ” never mistreat an enemy by half”
The US president said the flat Fenlands of East Anglia were a ready made aircraft carrier, and airfields began appearing all over East Anglia, the aircraft would circle above these airfields locals said the sky was dark with them and the noise unbearable and were then joined by many other aircraft
and 1000 bomber raids were an everyday occurence, after the bombing when emergency services came out to help a second wave would come over to then bomb them, the RAF bombed schools hospitals and strafed refugee columns of women children and the elderly on a daily basis, i visited ex wartime RAF men in hospital before their deaths to hear their confessions and some were too ashamed to even speak of what they had done.
The British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan said this was the greatest crime of the war and the Holocaust story was made up to cover for it.
The dropping of incendaries to start fires on a country already bombed to nothing and begging for an honourable surrender, is a war crime of horrendous proportions, Adolf Hitler said “had we won the war Britain would be on trial for their war crimes”
There has been several petitions before Parliament to have the Winston Churchill statues removed, and his face taken off our banknotes,as Churchill was working for Rothschild and the jews as a Soviet agent.
Sir Anthony Blunt described the R.A.F as the biggest cowards of the war, so when you see the statue in green Park London, be aware of the crimes these men committed, and the Jewish singer who visited care homes and orphanages and buggered 1000 young boys
did you know
that there are almost 1,100 israeli war criminals living free in the london area?
some have murdered children in palestine syria iraq and lebanon
why are these bastards not prosecuted ?
I’ve been to ‘Oradour’ several times over the years. Mainly because others wanted to visit.
It is a nice stroll from the visitor center. However, I was struck by the filmset looks, and the carefully delapidated buildings, with old rust cars/vehicles in peculiar locations.
I am not saying that a lot of sheeple didn’t die in or near Oradour. But I do question how they might have died.
I don’t want to comment on this specific case, because you are wasting your time broadcasting the truth, because they are thicko sheeple with their brainwashed lambs getting indoctrinated by the education system.
Now I’ve had a thought, I will comment. How can the UK Nazi Party deport an individual to a country, where that individual can’t present a legal defence, because that defence would be illegal?
“Racism”?? Define it…are we required to ignore all group differences? “Xenophobia”?? So we’re required to welcome our replacement by horny, hostile, opportunistic welfare shopping scum?
Note….the mad neurotic globalist fiend Jacinda Ardern (former employee of the most hated man in Britain…BLAIR) is making moves to shut down free speech in NZ.
The lackeys of the Labour Party in the jewish controlled NZ Media are holding FAKE discussions on TV about the introduction of new hate laws….they have panels purporting to discuss the issue….BUT…infact are all on board with the new laws.The supposed opponents want extra safeguards put in place….this is all bullshit designed to dupe the public.
NZers should prepare themselves for ANOTHER TERM for Ardern DESPITE THE POLLS…because global jewry are going to run a replay on the stolen American election.
Therefore NZ ZIOVISION TV MUST BE CLOSELY MONITORED FOR “DISCREPANCIES “…..
You can see the disastrous illegal immigration the jews have brought apon America…over FIVE MILLION illegals and counting.(ditto Britain….dont dismiss the idea that it is entirely possible he is a crypto jew)
BOTH BIDEN AND TRUMP ARE JEWS…..FACT….and so too are Trudeau and Albanese 💯. ….hence their moves to Rob Canadian and Australian goyim to finance the Ukrainian jewish elite including the jewish midget Zelenski….now a billionaire.
Biden has to be mentioned….this Marrano Catholic is a COMPLETE AND UTTER JERK OFF….he appears to believe he is an important man on a mission….IT IS AN EXAMPLE OF AN UTTER LAUGHABLY PATHETIC IDIOT….being used to dupe the public.
The Chinese will be laughing at the preposterous idiot and allowing him to think he is respected….
So Biden is a new phenomenon in American leaders….starting with another preposterous overblown jerk Obama….”The elder statesman with the 50 million dollar house run entirely by the jews.
‘In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.’ The corrupt elites have no intention of allowing this revolution gain traction.
“The Jewish People shall be its own Messiah” and it will be crucified (gassed), rise again (as survivors) and dominate the world at the right hand of its father the Devil, Adolf Hitler
The de-industrialization of Germany is beginning to make sense now…
You can’t be buying German made cars and believe the holocaust…
But if the German car is made in the US that would be be kosher.
Millions and millions of German cars have been sold to people, rich people who really don’t give a toss, that’s obvious wouldn’t you say?
One day buying a German car might be antisemitic???
History yet again repeats itself and to quote George Santayana:
“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
And the jew, yet again, through their predatory tactics with nothing but contempt for the host population, will end up experiencing yet another pogrom and exile. I’m just hoping that this is the last time and they’re either ‘permanently’ removed from this mortal coil or locked away on an island, never allowed to leave nor have contact with the outside world.
No matter how many times I tell people, it’s the jews, they never get it. And of course it’s the usual – “but it’s not all jews, only a small part of the population behave badly”. I always respond – “that may be true, I do not know, but one thing I do know is their lack of trying to stop bad jewish behaviour upon the goyim.”
This really is their Achilles heel. Their lack of action to do right shows their complicity.
If the Jews thought the first ‘Holocaust’ was bad, wait till they see the next one.
Oradour as i am informed was a NaziSS
retaliation against french partisan actions
(marquise) like Lidice in tscechoslovakia
was a NaziSS reataliation because of british
agents assasination of Reinhard Heydrich .
both villages had nothing to do with the partisan
actions . after Heydrichs death Globotnic
organised the Action Reinhard, gasing jews+
political prisoners. how it went i dont know.
probably Chelmno.Treblinka,Belzec were
involved in it
The whole rickety house of cards is posited on the so called holocost..it’s the basis and methodology applied to all of globohomo’s psychological golems…
and there is an obvious reason for that.. and why it must be protected at all costs..
lt’s even echoed currently in the so called covid nonsense and supposed ‘nazis’ in Eastern Europe (although as usual… applied selectively but equally incongruously)..
Unquestionable ‘dogma’s’ enforced by threats.. coercion and regime violence and supported by a paupers broth of evidential absurdity… and a corrupt jewdiciary…
the definition of Gallows Humour… and ‘jew’ projection…
“You can see the disastrous illegal immigration the jews have brought apon America…over FIVE MILLION illegals”
How about we multiply that number by at least.?
“but it’s not all jews, only a small part of the population behave badly”.”
That would be the brainwashed ignorant Christian Zionists
Actually (Zionuts) Because they are nutty as fruitcake.
For those who respond it’s not the jews, it’s some jews, then respond that it wasn’t England that won the battle of Trafalgar but some English.
To the poster above who has visited Oradour sur Glane many times, Vincent Reynourd’s revision of the historical version is very convincing.
History teaches us that Oradour was a Nazi massacre of civilians done for sheer sadistic pleasure. Vincent Reynouard describes how the area was known for resistance fighters (mostly communists, who went on to slaughter 100 000 Catholics, monarchists and right wing intellectuals after the ‘liberation’) and the Nazis went the town to look for culprits. All the men of the village where lined up outside whilst the women and children were driven into the Church. In the church a stock of explosives left by the resistance blew up, killing many of the women and children. That’s the massacre according to Vincent Reynouard. We’re not even talking about holocaust revision here and technically he has broken no law, even in France.
The Fabius-Gayssot Law forbids one to question any conclusion of the Nuremberg Laws, yet the film Katyn made it to French cinemas despite the fact that Katyn is an alledged Nazi crime according to Nuremberg. So, none of the legal points make any sense.
Can anyone tell me Ardern’s real name from before he started pretending to be a woman?
Bit like Miranda Blair (or B***** LIAR), or “Michele” Obongo.
In case anyone hadn’t noticed, we’re ruled by PERVERTS, and I wonder how many more there are.
in the UK we had a prime minister who fought in w w 2 and had intell connections
Harold Macmillan said back in the 60s there was no holocaust no jews went up the chimney
but they did go o the USA to avoid being called up for war
so common was it that jews went to the doctor to get out of the war that the TV show MASH has an obvious jew named klinger who does everything possible to get out of the army
Ukraine is struggling to be jewish
name me one israeli who is fighting for them
You cant.
RE: Vincent Reynouard.
A warning to the awoke and wise..
Watch your backs…
There is no law…human rights…” CONstitution” etc. etc.
I am still a bit UNdecided re:the Kanye West issue(ie organic and/or staged), but regardless the Jews are into global censorhip mode.
They will pull any/all strings /triggers to make sure the crucial/critical Holocaust domino does NOT fall.
More sign that (((Communism))) is slowly but surely taking over globally.
History tells us that since the unification of the mainly Teutonic and relatively tiny European nations through the Prussian military superiority under Bismark, the leaders of the new nation in the 1800’s called “Deutschland” (meaning “the people’s land”) wanted their place in the “colonial sun”, in a colonial world dominated by its western European neighbors, and mostly by the Anglo imperial powers of the UK and the US. With the industrial, scientific and military development of Germany the British establishment in particular could see the rivalry increasing on a global scale threatening to upset their apple cart, and if the Jewish money had a hand in starting WWI they certainly were not alone in any of the provocations which started that war.
However, with the Rothschild money-power having taken control of US finances, the US media, and essentially that nation’s political system through a financial network of agents such as Warberg, Schiff, and Morgan, by 1910 Britian must have had assurances that if it provoked Germany into a war on the EU continent it would get the backing of the US. In fact, the entire history of the pre-war election of Woodrow Wilson and the creation US Federal Reserve is traced to the same money-power dynasty roosting mainly in the UK.
It is said that the Rothschild dynasty plans major world events 50 to 100 years in advance. Before the results of the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 reached the ears of English investors, that dynasty in its control of the relevant information was able to feint a defeat for the allied forces, and essentially take over major British assets and finances. History now even tells us that Nappy’s “escape” from Elba was arranged just for such a planned purpose, of not just arranging for a total defeat of war-exhausted France but most likely for the financial hegemony of the same dynasty in Britian and on the continent. With respect to insider knowledge from being able to both plan and control major world events, all one can expect if money and power are your goals is to become increasingly more wealthy and powerful. Also, just happening to be able to control the most sophisticated intelligence network on the planet provides totally reliable insider knowledge to guarantee your investments, and ever since 1815 the intelligence networks controlled by the Rothschild dynasty have been vastly superior to any remaining independent national agency in the world.
Had the Rothchild house been a Scottish clan with first loyalties to a particular national realm other than the Zionist one, and not to an exclusive power which regarded itself with special entitlement rights over all others, few would bat an eye about their political prowess, planning and manipulations for their “successes”, which ruthless methods and plundering are not really different from any of the evils of “successful” imperialist monarchies and empires in world history. However, being crowned a monarch over a particular nation does invite enemies if you have expansionist goals, and it is always better when you have the most money to work behind the scenes and pretend to have a diversity of loyalties.
We know that free speech and disclosure of all of the facts on matters concerning our vital interests, such as plandemics and wars, is crucial to us, because without such we the people cannot make rational or responsible decisions to right wrongs and prevent harms.
As for history where we are able to distance ourselves more from our prejudices, we are now able to determine that events such as WWI did not just “evolve” or “happen”, but that the power moguls of the West determined behind closed doors that it was necessary. However, it was clear in the aftermath of that war that Germany was not completely conquered, even with all of the Rothschild UK, French and US resources thrown into that war. The same powers in the aftermath decided the nation would have to be finished off in some other way. They tried crippling reparations at first, and it is doubtful that the rise of fascism, or Hitler, was a Rothschild design. Those developments more than likely were a reaction to the various influences and controls coming from that dynasty, for what we now are able to see are the actual bread crumbs from the propagation of the world communist movement leading directly to that same castle door. It was communism which the fascists in the 1920’s and 1930’s were reacting against, and which lead to the strange polarization where the UK and US became bedfellows with the USSR against the evil Axis powers – and their power moguls were evil, as were those of the USSR, and also those of our beloved West.
So, one evil was created to trounce another evil and at the conclusions of both wars we ended up with more evils, and with the Rothschild’s and the march of communism largely victorious, leading all the way to the coincidental “collapse” of the USSR at the same time as virtually all nations on the globe endorsed the largely Rothschild-minion-made 1992 UN Agenda 21 – the plans for a centralized world government and financial order forged together on a host of manufactured sustainability pretexts. “Coincidentally”, all of the governments of the nations whose representatives endorsed the Agenda 21 “plans” were beholding to the same international banking cartel.
Also, “coincidentally” at the same time there had been over a decade of “successful” very prosperous Western trade with “communist” China which like Israel is another prodigy of the Rothschild dynasty. How then could by 1992 the Western powers maintain the cold war stance against the USSR and its alleged “ally”, China, on the pretext that “communism” from Russia was a major threat? With over a decade of free and open trade with communist China by 1992, it was also absolutely clear to the crafters and backers of Agenda 21, that there was no “real” prosperity to the West in dealing with China. The trade has drained our governments making huge profits to the major money-power investors based mainly on the exploitation of our markets. They greatly prospered but unfortunately each of our nations were turned from being global creditor nations to debtor nations in that short period of time, all resulting from the clearly obvious huge trade deficits and domestic deficit financing by our governments. Economically, these were entirely foreseeable harms (therefore obviously “planned” harms) – and they were all controlled and overseen by this same Western-based financial dynasty. These are the same money-power moguls behind the international baking cartel controlling our governments all through the very-planned Covid pandemic. They have cancelled all of our basic rights and freedoms and will continue to do so in marching their minions and evil mandates over our faces in order to usher in their totalitarian and technocratic New World Order.
Let’s please attempt to speak with precision.
If Scotland’s oldest Newspaper is now owned by Americans, then it’s the only major Newspaper in the world that is owned by Americans!
No. The Herald is owned by the same people who own all the major American newspapers.
For what it’s worth, those people also own America, Scotland, France, and most of the rest of the world, BUT only because too many people who understand this fact are afraid to speak of it — and only UNTIL those people begin to speak of it and NAME THE JEW.
all ruling +ruled politicians of last 20 years
have to be killed !
all judges of last 20 years have to be killed !
all liberal + zionist judaised christians have
to be killed !
all who have voted the greenleftist open border
assholes have to be killed !
all police reglementing their native fellows + letting
criminal foreigners go have to be killed .
all administrators leaving own native homeless on
street and accomodating african-islamic-jewish
parasites have to be killed ! all houseowners
behaving this way have to be killed !
all police playing down victims of rape have to
be killed !
all judges + police censoring open speech by
punishment have to be killed ! etc etc etc
Sebastien Wolf: I don’t know what happened at Oradour. I can only say is what I saw, and felt when I visited this place. I don’t care for the official, or alternative narratives.
The claims of Oradour could be just as suspect as the Holocaust.
The ruined village of Oradour looks and has the feel of a film set. This could be intended, or unintended. I can’t read minds, maybe I can read collective minds, because they give more clues.
Damien has the right idea.
“Toxic Ideology”: English Neo-Nazi Given Four Years For His Extremist Views
https://jonathanturley.org/2021/05/26/toxic-ideology-english-neo-nazi-given-four-years-for-his-extremist-views/
QUOTE:
“……..We often discuss how defending free speech often means defending those who we find thoroughly grotesque or offensive. In that sense, Nicholas Brock, 52, is the ultimate personification of the price we pay for free speech. The neo-Nazi was given a four-year sentence for what the court called his “toxic ideology” based on the contents of the home he shared with his mother in Maidenhead, Berkshire.
In my view, the only thing more troubling than Brock’s hateful views is the decision to criminalize the holding of such views. It is an example of the continued erosion of bright-line protections of free speech in the United Kingdom and other European countries.
Judge Peter Lodder QC declared “I do not sentence you for your political views, but the extremity of those views informs the assessment of dangerousness.” That is a fine distinction that allows for sweeping criminalization of political viewpoints.
……..”
================
COMMENT:
Albeit from May of last year….parsing through the story the accused simply possessed possible controversial items etc. etc. within the confines of his residence, NOT in active distribution thereof.
So extrapolating further..does owning copy or PDF etc of “Mein Kampf” etc. make one subject to similar charges ?
It’s not difficult to get the Scots by the goolies ? They wear skirts & no knickers …
The truth uncensored here @
* https://nationalvanguard.org/tag/vincent-reynouard/
* https://codoh.com/library/authors/reynouard-vincent/
” DEMOCRATIE PARTICIPATIVE # 1 in EUROPE ” by Boris ✞ LELAY ©
⚡ http://7ov433bmudtgkl3vnjbg6rfke4n4rwk6xi2mxrvlgjgrw46ws7vqrsqd.onion/ (TOR or Brave)
🟢 https://odysee.com/@dakapo:4
⚡ https://gab.com/DemocratieParticipative
🟢 https://gab.com/groups/3930
⚡ https://gab.com/groups/2085
France has “laws restricting historical and scientific enquiry”?!? And the French aren’t dragging the scum who pushed through that criminally absurd and repugnant law through the streets by their ankles and chopping their f*cking heads off? Any country that would restrict the questioning of historical and scientific narratives and punish such natural and necessary acts with jail has completely betrayed the citizenry and has forfeited any and all legitimacy.
BARNEY is so right
in the 30s lord rothschild had a shis apostles homosexuals many had convictions against young boys there were his followers he said comunism was the way and homosexuals would lead it in
all over the world now perversion is big
from hilary clintons under age girls to tony blair selling his bottom in public toilets to obama having young lads smuggles in over night at the white house
OK..i have had just about enough of this double speak special pleading bullshit.
Either you are a religion in which case criticism is not necessarily bigotry, or you are a race in which case it is not necessarily racism.
IF these retards continue to insist they are a race…
then they should be required to PROVIDE EXTENSIVE PROOF.
Secondly the FACT that their evidence for their narrative is so freaking weak
that they have to JAIL people for disputing it,highly suggests that they are
LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH.
Most of us never would have thought to question the narrative at all, UNTIL we saw this behavior
going on…it is ridiculous.