1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Commentary
  4.  » A delicate balancing act

Irish Savant – irishsavant.net Nov 11, 2022

Why does the (usually groundless) accusation anti-Semitism always work? How does it transform prominent, accomplished men and women into compliant lickspittles and toadies, willing to throw their own principles, people, or religious convictions under the bus in order to appease their Jewish persecutors? Jews, at least since WW II, have mastered a delicate balancing act whereby they manage to deflect criticism while behind the scenes they plundered their unwitting host nations. The first plank was pity – how could you attack the most cruelly persecuted people in history, persecuted for no reason whatsoever? As Israeli writer Ari Shavit put it: “We may murder with impunity because the Holocaust museum is on our side”. The other protective force field was raw power, a power often deployed via osmosis whereby it was simply known or inferred that you crossed them at your peril. It’s a tricky balancing act given that it seeks to reconcile two diametrically opposed control vectors. After all how can you pity (and thereby hold to lower standards) a people who can and will destroy you at the drop of a (small) hat? Be that as it may they’ve been staggeringly successful at it up to now.

But is that about to change? I ask because some recent developments have snatched away the carefully-nurtured mask of self-pity, replacing it with an exercise in raw power so comprehensive and vindictive as to raise questions among even the most slack-jawed media-addicted normies. I wrote about Ye in the previous post and the reaction to his straying off the reservation after which his business interests and his musical career were destroyed in quick order.

But in some ways the case of Kyrie Irving is even more instructive. While admitting to never having heard of him before he went rogue his fate further underlines the reality that being a black NBA icon won’t protect you from the wrath of the Tribe should you step outside the role they assign to you. I say it’s even more significant than Ye because the only thing Irving did was to tweet a link to a documentary that Jews don’t like. All he said by way of personal input was a suggestion to “check this out”. That was all.

In response he was subjected to what was in effect a public lynching, a ritual humiliation, made bend the knee in a formal act of submission to the point where he desperately sought to buy back his freedom by way of a $500,000 ransom to the ADL. His apologies and retractions weren’t enough. He had to grovel. If there was a demographic on the face of this planet I’d have less sympathy and empathy for it would probably be black footballers or basketball players. But in truth I found it painful to watch this guy’s public humiliation. It made me uncomfortable on a human level….seeing a man forced to beg and crawl before his masters.

And what a freakishly vile set of masters they are. Look at Adam Silver (right), the NBA Commissioner before whom Irving had to abase himself. Is this creature fully human or is it part lizard, part man? Same with this freak from the ADL, Greenblatt. Does he look fully human to you? I’m not being flippant here. There is something of the extra-dimensional demon about him.

Now these are the people da bruddas see dragging their heroes through the muck, in effect saying “on your knees nigger!”. This is compounded by the realisation that what Ye said was – and is – demonstrably true and that Irving’s so-called offence was trivial and the resulting retribution totally disproportionate. My faith in the general public’s ability to see through the Jewish force-field has always been close to non-existent but I believe that a tipping point may have been reached via these developments. I’ve examined as many reader comments as I could find across a spectrum of political and social views on internet forums. Even after the censors have done their bit the reactions have been significantly in favour of the victims. Of course it helps that they’re black. But the hitherto ineffable subject of Jewish power has received a right good airing, well beyond what I’ve ever seen before.

Of course one swallow doesn’t make a Summer. This could all slide back under the radar as Joe Public’s attention gets redirected to Kim Kardashian’s latest hair-style. But I think these incidents have lit a spark that will not be easily extinguished. The spark might not burst into flame like it did in Germany in the 1930s but the Jewish Power has been forced out of the shadows. Most people of course won’t be able to connect the dots, at least not yet, but they will have an uneasy feeling that something isn’t quite right about all of this. Maybe they’ll begin to look a bit deeper, especially if the West continues to spiral down the tubes. We can but hope. This hope is reinforced by the perennial Achilles’ Heel of the Jews: Their propensity to keep pushing their chutzpah until their host population eventually rises up against them. History has demonstrated this time and again. But they never learn. And they never learn because they neither listen to nor accept any criticism. They’ve been thrown out of 109 pubs because the owners were biased against them. Such a propensity can be an asset in that in enhances group solidarity but it can be – literally – a fatal weakness when it blinds you to the growing resentment of your unfortunate hosts.

Fingers crossed!

Source