2nd Smartest Guy in the World – Oct 26, 2022
by Laura J. Wellington
Ask any single woman about the ease of dating in today’s world and they will most certainly roll their eyes and groan. As a single woman myself, I can vouch for how tough the dating climate is for every one of us. But unvaccinated, single women now have it that much harder. The reason? The decision as to whether or not they will date vaccinated men is now on the table. And I can tell you first-hand, which has nothing to do with the viability of the candidates, themselves, as rich and interesting prospects, but rather “sex” to put it bluntly.
The overriding concern that the harmful effects of this vaccine may, ultimately, enter these women once the raincoat comes off.
As these women chose to remain unvaccinated for a reason, mitigating any risk by eliminating candidates based upon vaccine-status has become their new norm. Doing so isn’t without its issues, admittedly. Qualifying single men by such a standard makes the pool in which to select from additionally small, especially if one is living in a blue state. On top of that, plenty of single men don’t shine to the notion that they aren’t being considered simply because they decided to get vaccinated. Among the most disgruntled, hostile men tend to be those who succumbed to the vaccine by force. Feeling penalized twice over for a vaccine they never wanted to begin with, many of these men don’t handle these women’s rejection well.
Guilt, annoyance, diminishment, and just plain rudeness are known to occur in relation to these women’s decision to stay committed to their particular stance. “I have been called names for stating that the vaccine is a dealbreaker for me,” said Anika Janis.
For these women, there is simply not enough information about the vaccine or its effects to warrant consideration. No one knows the ramifications or what is to come for those who took the vaccine.
Where men might take being vetoed personally, women don’t see it that way. Women see it as an act of self-preservation and safety in the face of reality, given the nature of a large portion of men presently. Most will not want to keep that raincoat on for longer than absolutely necessary. With this in mind, until much, much more is uncovered about how this vaccine impacts lives, the decision ‘not to date’ vaccinated men remains steadfast for numerous unvaccinated women.
Although some may see these women’s extreme caution as being foolish, others point to the “intense criticism experienced, extreme pressure imposed by vaccine mandates, and the physical anomalies shared by outspoken vaccinated — people no longer the picture of health after receiving the vaccine” to validate their decision. For these women, science ‘speaking to the efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccines’ does little to remove the fear associated with what they are observing all around them simply because “no one knows who to trust anymore” in their opinion. That, in itself, is the only consistent truth these women feel that they can count on.
And if you think they are alone in this assertion, think again. Plenty of unvaccinated parents agree and are cautioning their teenage and adult children to adopt that same form of thinking when it comes to dating. Single, unvaccinated men are also following suit and running into the same issues as their single, unvaccinated, female counterparts. Calling themselves “Purebloods,” they too are only looking for unvaccinated partners to date. And even unvaccinated, married women have taken a stand with regards to their husbands’ decisions to take the vaccine or not. Several have noted to me that “divorce has been become an option” if their husbands buckled to the pressure of being vaccinated. All in all, the dilemma is resonating strongly across the unvaccinated board, beginning with single women.
As each person’s health is truly their own responsibility, the stance so many unvaccinated, single women are taking when contemplating future partners holds implications that span everything from ‘lost opportunity’ to ‘potentially moving to red states boasting larger pickings’ to the possibility of ‘remaining alone’ forever. That said, there is also the factor of time that may soften their positions. As more information comes out and more is understood, some of them may change their minds. But many say “No,” citing differing vaccination statuses and ‘overall perspectives between vaccinated and unvaccinated’ being just too great. The same holds true for blood transfusions, which they are also avoiding like the plague due to concerns over “vaccinated” blood being given to them.
“The Decision to Live. Unfortunately the blood supply is contaminated too, so no blood transfusions,” said Moa Refm.
“It (the vaccine) says a lot about who these men are at the core, including their level of awareness and definition of life,” said Kathy McPherson.
Fear over the exchange of bodily fluids (including saliva) combined with worries about the ramifications of shedding adds a further layer and deterrent beyond mere ejaculation. It isn’t one element alone that screams, “Stop,” rather many woven together — all of which make complete sense in their particular view.
For now, dating for single, unvaccinated women has just become even more insufferable than before. Who would have ever thought that “vaccine status” would become so central to cultivating new friendships and love relationships for much of our nation? The divide is here to stay because the damage that caused it has already been done. Nothing can put that genie back in its bottle.
Laura J. Wellington is the founder of THREAD MB, author, award-winning children’s television creator, TEDx Speaker, and the founder of the ZNEEX app
—
Do NOT comply.
Please consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Very interesting article from a woman’s point of view. As an older single male, dating is just a thing of the past.
The Purebloods have to breed! They are the future of humanity. Resist partnering with a Vaxxed one – you just don’t know the long-term consequences.
Let’s see a Pureblood dating agency!
If these young women had the sense to avoid being injected with experimental and inadequately tested mRNA “vaccines”, why would they be stupid enough to allow themselves to be injected with the sperm of men so reckless as to take jabs that no one (doctors included) have any idea of the long-term effects?
As an unvaccinated man, I would not consider having sex with a vaccinated woman. Having ignored my letter inviting me to come along and get vaxxed I received a phone call from the NHS to try to persuade me to have it. I asked only one question, If I have this injection, what are the long-term effects? The guy said, “I don’t know, no one does”. To which I replied “Well wouldn’t that mean that I would have to be a complete idiot if I accepted? That was the end of the conversation.
It works two ways. Unvaccinated men don’t want to sleep with vaccinated women. One also has to ask; why a woman would even contemplate sleeping with a vaccinated man, if she wasn’t wanting a long, term relationship and vice versa?
But what this woman fails to see is that by 2030 there will be more women, single and childless than ever in history. She also fails to understand that more and more men are leaving the dating scene due to Feminism, #MeToo and the many toxic women out there who have swapped their femininity for masculinity.
Someone is thinking. Truths.
A society that love SEX, well, go do it and be infected. Well thought out plan this plandemic.
How do one fool billions of people and then force a mask mandate on said.
One day I hope to be on the level of the GOD who called this plandemic. laugh!!!!
church, temples, etc..,
My GOD. White Supremacy, another laugh.
An EVIL haS taken over America called IGNORANCE.
Mystic and Yogi
Who knows if more adult women than adult men are unvaxxed?
I spoke to an adult male 6 months ago and he told me his wife made him get the jab.
The only bit I agree with in this article is that the unvaxxed are the ‘pure bloods’
How does a woman “Check” if a man has been vaccinated ? there are a lot of lying men out there.
there will be a big lying in relationships.
fraud fraud fraud everywhere in a false world .
I should also say blood transfusions are out of the question.
Did you know they are making 100% synthetic blood these days. Well, I think they are and the oldies are being used as guinea-pigs…
I spoke to a stranger a couple of hours ago. I initiated the conversation, I am very, very good at doing this these days, I have been for quite a while.
I established he’s another one completely brainwashed by the Jewish media and fully onboard with it.
OMG.
“Where men might take being vetoed personally, women don’t see it that way. Women see it as an act of self-preservation and safety in the face of reality, given the nature of a large portion of men presently. Most will not want to keep that raincoat on for longer than absolutely necessary. With this in mind, until much, much more is uncovered about how this vaccine impacts lives, the decision ‘not to date’ vaccinated men remains steadfast for numerous unvaccinated women. ”
This statement generalizes negatively about ostensible male emotionalism while implying that women are just being rational. (!) When the above stated factors would apply for all vaxxed/unvaxxed men/women in any analysis regarding dating, this is treated as some sort of women’s issue. It is not. If you swapped men and women in the above paragraph minus or including the contrived contradistinctions, the exact same points would be equally or more valid.
More valid dating contradistinctions are ignored. In general, women are the more neurotic gender and more inclined to over-estimate and over-react to perceived threats, often irrationally. Even wikipedia is forced to admit to this generality. The karen meme exists for a reason and is pretty well documented on the video sites as are male injury-risking behaviors. The percentage of vaccinated women, especially early on in the scamdemic, was far higher than the male percentage. Look at the videos of the early lines for vaccination when the vaccines were being pitched as somewhat unavailable. Perhaps they had more time to wait in line? Men became vaccinated in numbers approaching, never equalling, female numbers when it became a condition of employment. The men who refused vaccination often risked more than just themselves by remaining unvaxxed. These ignored points demonstrate the feminist nature of the article and a bias probably designed to elevate the esteem of self-interested women in the dating market. Consequently, any pretense toward a disinterested commentary vanishes in the contrived contradistinctions displayed in this puff-piece written for a self-interested audience by a self-interested writer. Possibly, her motives were even darker in that this was an attempt to drive more wedges between the sexes. In writing for the emotional elevation her audience the writer ignores more pressing vax issues for women such as: men may recognize that many vaxxed women were not driven by the same necessities as men to the vax and that a possible driver for getting the vax provides a strong indicator of the neurotic nature of the prospective date.
And due to his willingness to risk himself for his family to keep his job, the vaxxed male is basically dealing with the same neuroticism that caused many vaxxed women to get vaxxed in the first place. He may find that he is dealing with a woman (excused in spades in the above article) whose neuroticism is being differently focused. He may consider that he will be better off without this one… In other words, in addition to the self-imposed results of uninformed male good intentions, he may now have to deal with a new manifestation of existing female emotional frailties. This is not to excuse the guys who couldn’t figure out how to avoid a life-shortening jab, this is only to point out new detriments laid before everybody in the dating market. Respect for good intentions should be reserved for children only. ‘Knowing better’ will always kick ass on ‘meaning well’.
But, for an efficacious female dating perspective, an unvaxxed woman will definitely be dating up with an unvaxxed male.
“Where men might take being vetoed personally, women don’t see it that way. Women see it as an act of self-preservation and safety in the face of reality, given the nature of a large portion of men presently. Most will not want to keep that raincoat on for longer than absolutely necessary. With this in mind, until much, much more is uncovered about how this vaccine impacts lives, the decision ‘not to date’ vaccinated men remains steadfast for numerous unvaccinated women. ”
This statement generalizes negatively about ostensible male emotionalism while implying that women are just being rational. (!) When the above stated factors would apply for all vaxxed/unvaxxed men/women in any analysis regarding dating, this is treated as some sort of women’s issue. It is not. If you swapped men and women in the above paragraph minus or including the contrived contradistinctions, the exact same points would be equally or more valid.
More valid dating contradistinctions are ignored. In general, women are the more neurotic gender and more inclined to over-estimate and over-react to perceived threats, often irrationally. Even wikipedia is forced to admit to this generality. The karen meme exists for a reason and is pretty well documented on the video sites as are male injury-risking behaviors. The percentage of vaccinated women, especially early on in the scamdemic, was far higher than the male percentage. Look at the videos of the early lines for vaccination when the vaccines were being pitched as somewhat unavailable. Perhaps they had more time to wait in line? Men became vaccinated in numbers approaching, never equalling, female numbers when it became a condition of employment. The men who refused vaccination often risked more than just themselves by remaining unvaxxed. These ignored points demonstrate the feminist nature of the article and a bias probably designed to elevate the esteem of self-interested women in the dating market. Consequently, any pretense toward a disinterested commentary vanishes in the contrived contradistinctions displayed in this puff-piece written for a self-interested audience by a self-interested writer. Possibly, her motives were even darker in that this was an attempt to drive more wedges between the sexes. In writing for the emotional elevation her audience, the writer ignores more pressing vax issues for women such as: men may recognize that many vaxxed women were not driven by the same necessities as men to the vax and that a possible driver for getting the vax provides a strong indicator of the neurotic nature of the prospective date.
And due to his willingness to risk himself for his family to keep his job, the vaxxed male (while associating with an unvaxxed female) is basically dealing with the same neuroticism that caused many vaxxed women to get vaxxed in the first place. He may find that he is dealing with a woman (excused in spades in the above article) whose neuroticism is being differently focused. He may consider that he will be better off without this one… In other words, in addition to the self-imposed results of uninformed male good intentions, he may now have to deal with a new manifestation of existing female emotional frailties. This is not to excuse the guys who couldn’t figure out how to avoid a life-shortening jab, this is only to point out new detriments laid before everybody in the dating market. Respect for good intentions should be reserved for children only. ‘Knowing better’ will always kick ass on ‘meaning well’.
But, for an efficacious female dating perspective, an unvaxxed woman will definitely be dating up with an unvaxxed male.
Pure Pricks ONLY Need Apply.
Looks like I’ve got a lot of “work” ahead of me..😎
See this is why I think Mike Adams is controlled op.
He stated that no one wanted jabbed women and were avoiding them. Yip fair enough.
Then he went on to state that jabbed men dont have the same problems as jabbed women because it doesnt affect their reproductive get up.
Erm….the spike protein gets into all cells, even the sperm cells. This was both reckless and telling in his assertion. He should definitely know this.
I have had to turn down some really nice guys because they took this. I am just going to refrain from asking about whether they have been stabbed because there will be those who will lie and say they didnt.
Its best to not say anything but listen to cues ie they went on holiday abroad (ok so they have at least been tested which is another deal breaker as its the same shit different administration)
For me, I have decided to keep my own company, limit being around the stabbed, and if that means no dating….then so be it.
For those who are married to spouses and family, who went ahead and got it anyway, my heart goes out to them. It is an instant walk out scenario because of transmission. Seems being single and independent wasnt such a bad rap after all as I see those dependent on the joint finances now trapped unable to get out, seeing signs of transmission. And yes I heard of some whose partners didnt tell them they took the shot and well….we can figure out how that turned out. Imagine a partner not disclosing they were HIV+ and sleeping with you? Well we are in this dark and murky territory.
Jesus/Iseous/Yeshua did warn us that we were only worthy if we we prepared to leave our spouses, children and family for Him.
This truly is our personal test and many have already flunked.
You can put the genie back in the bottle if you force him to wear his “slicker” instead of a raincoat…
There is a slippery “slope” here (Nam notwithstanding)…
If Red Cross originally took a stand NOT to accept blood donated by the vaccinated, but then covered its ass by taking the stance that it would accept everybody’s blood…
But then immediately disposed of the vaccinated blood…
But then, when caught, decided to give vaccinated blood specifically to the unvaccinated (hehe)…
And you’re simply “having qualms” about being injected (coming in hot) by someone who got cold-injected with a vaccine that was engineered to mess with the “procreative equipment”?
Do something utterly selfish by donating your blood for storage when you will likely need it in the future, and keep your pussy from looking like Quasimodo’s rectum in 20 years…
Aristophanes is probably laughing about the similarity of outcome in his play Lysistrata, men have been forced to look for “love” in the wrong place. The operation was a success, the patient died.
What does sex add up to if it is not creating a family? The secret here is diseases, which piggy-back on the animals and are able to spread as parasites. Our modern culture has a lot to do with the interests of diseases, which have their own “purpose”
How unsurprising.. women worrying about their so called ‘sex lives’ (and the limitation thereof)…
and of course how this vaxxxine malarkey is causing them all sorts of trouble…. (with their ‘sex lives’)…
and having ignored the inconvenient truths for decades are finally being forced to countenance ‘Telegony’ as a reality (because it is)… and having already absorbed countless partners DNA.. (and no doubt their defects)…
which of course is unsurprising…
best to never go Commando you fellas (and certainly not french).. not if you’re a notch hunting online meat marketeer…
“As a single woman myself, I can vouch for how tough the dating climate is for every one of us.”
Nice to see that “love” lives on.
Anyone will do, as long as they have money and no poison.
Intriguing, but not UNexpected
If simple non- sexual shedding can impact pureblood UNvaccinated…..its not a stretch to postulate actual intercourse is on par with being needle raped..ie the semen would contain vaccine agents that the female would absorb.
I’m in my 60’s married,with 3 adult children…aka thank God we don’t have to participate in what many have no choice but to.
The Elite Scum have war gamed this quite well….with many peripheral matters such as dating being impacted. Why would an informed female..or male…have sex with a vaxxed person ? However, how honest will be people be re: their vaxx status ?
I shudder when vaxxed people are pregnant…given the horror stories re outcomes…..but this development could act as a form of contraception with people not willing to risk having sex at all…let alone abortion.
Good for you…pure bloods should stick together…I remember all the jibby jabs in the UK demanding I get sacked for not being stupid and gullible enough to ge jabbed..now they can’t get laid..serves them right.
Please forward to Truthseeker classified column:
Unvaccinated, bald 61 year old generously proportioned male “conspiracy theorist” with own teeth, in the West Midlands, seeks single unvaccinated woman…Prefer woman with less than a dozen grandchildren…
Good sense of humour, albeit with a tendency to be politically incorrect and swear…Makes up for being an arrogant know it all bastard by being a half decent cook…
Please apply via website…
Well duuuuh.
It’s not just that
what about heart failure – how many will be alive in 5 years from now?
mostly men get this after the jab unfortunately
you build up a relationship and then it’s medical problems all the way
chesterton on October 27, 2022 at 1:27 pm
and having ignored the inconvenient truths for decades are finally being forced to countenance ‘Telegony’ as a reality (because it is)… and having already absorbed countless partners DNA.. (and no doubt their defects)…
=================================
I also read a while back that womens’ bodies absorb each of their sex partners genetic matter.
So..if they have been quite promiscuous…what are the ultimate impacts on their bodies and morseo on any/all future children?
More and more women need to take charge and admit Feminism and Womens Movement was not freedom/liberation but instead another (((Jew))) weapon aimed at them to destroy men…….and leave them childless , miserable and alone.
The vaxx issue will lead to an explosion of “cat” ladies and further drag down society.
Anyone reading this please pay attention. YOU ARE A RAPE VICTIM! The whole human race has been raped with the Covid vaxx. No, you didn’t take it, but your sexual partner did. No, you didn’t take it, but you are involved in an accident and need a blood transfusion. Sorry, but yes you did.
The human genome has been polluted and, most likely, this is irreversible. Are you angry enough to do something about it. No, I thought not – – -.
You’re far too civilized and genteel to object to being raped. Shit happens. No need to apprehend the rapist. Besides which he has a lot of money and I don’t. Do you mind if I lie down and spread my legs again? I’m used to being f******d by you and feel free to do it again.
If the real humans reading this can’t rise up and confront this crime against them then all is lost for Homo Sapiens, or whatever.
An African man was asked how it made him feel to be giving AIDS to women, using sex: he said it made him feel powerful
I’d like to see the human who can tell that the person they’re lusting after has been poisoned. How many statements made by either one to the other whilst dancing around each other are actually true? “Have you been jabbed?” “No, you tell me first.” And so on. Just like “I’ve got rich relations in Switzerland” and “when I was in Hawaii last month”. Not to mention the fact that 90% of the jabbed got a placebo (or else they’d be dead). No, ticking time bomb poison isn’t a thing. If they’re still alive after a few months then they’re not going to die, not unless they’re dumb enough to get jabbed again. That’s the point of the “boosters” remember?