HenryMakow.com – Oct 12, 2022
Promiscuity is promoted to young woman to destroy the oxytocin bonding that takes place when a woman has intercourse with a man.
This undermines marriage for purposes of depopulation.
“Also, the more men a woman sleeps with the more she erodes her oxytocin “glue.” Women are not built to have multiple partners –whores have the highest mortality rate. Women need to know that every added man they sleep with, is exponentially takingly the years off their life–bringing them closer and faster to death. Like smoking cigarettes it increases mortality. Changing partners is dangerous–life threatening for women. It does not effect men this way –at all!”
“The “weaker sex” doesn’t just refer to physically weaker they are also “weaker” i.e. emotionally vulnerable — but that vulnerability channeled into love-bonding with one man –in one marriage and motherhood is a strength.”
by Jennifer – (henrymakow.com)
Oxytocin bonding makes females lose discernment abilities–They literally can’t discern because oxytocin floods their bodies and makes them chemically addicted to the man–that means if they try to leave they literally get sick because they go through a detox.
Some women get cancer –they get all sorts of health problems –just like coming off an addiction to heroin. Women get the shakes, vomit, can’t sleep -when detoxing from a relationship –just like detoxing from heroin –its torture –so many women can’t handle it and they run back to the man or a woman may throw herself into another sexual relationship to oxytocin bond to the next…to take the edge off. Women have no clue that they are REACTING to this oxytocin love-bond-addiction.
Further, the consequences of women’s oxytocin love-bonding is an education that has been purposely omitted from standard sex education.
These oxytocin effects have been medically researched and are known, but knowing this truth undercuts the Deep State’s agenda. “They” don’t want people to have healthy loving marriages and families.
> Oxytocin bonding makes females lose discernment abilities–They literally can’t discern because oxytocin floods their bodies and makes them chemically addicted to the man–that means if they try to leave they literally get sick because they go through a detox.
What a load of bull.
Moreover, humans are incapable of love, so it can’t be destroyed. What you call “love” is simply lust, and it fades very quickly. Women get married because they want to feed off the man. That’s why they marry rancid old men that have money. Men get married because they want a “home” to come back to at night. They both want brats. But all feelings between them fade within a few months. After all, “marriage” is completely unnatural. The natural thing for you to do would be for the woman to choose a mate, get pregnant, stay with the man until the brat is able to run, then the man has nothing more to do with them. That’s what your species does naturally — ie. it’s what monkeys do. Naturally, the group of monkeys would protect all the children collectively, with mothers minding other mother’s brats whilst the other mother gets food, but you don’t even look after each other as a group, which is unnatural again. “Marriage” is a thing made up by religion to control you.
Having said all that, I believe people should only marry once and only have sex with someone they’re married to. Which shows my own programming has succeeded wonderfully.
Jennifer’s closing statement…
To wit: “I basically hung up on my male friend because he just could not wrap his mind around the idea that women don’t have free will when it comes to intimate relationships. If they don’t have free will, they are off the hook — Yes that’s right –So we need a society to understand that teach that and protect women. “…
says it all …
and you fellas…..don’t fall for any of this horseshit… because finding new excuses for bad behaviour is the only consistency you’ll find in most (not all) women…
and they’ve been doing it since Eve ate the apple..
NB: and shagged Satan..hehe…
Women have a stronger sense of smell than men have.
Down the years I have often heard a woman say, “The first thing that attracted me to my husband was his smell” (Not his after shave – HIS SMELL.)
I have never heard a man say that as per his wife.
I was moderately ‘addicted’ to the scent/taste of a former girlfriends…’nectar’. Perhaps it was the way she would share it. Such as sneaking into my apartment after finishing a shift as a nurse, showering, and gently waking me up with her thighs caressing my cheeks.
Forgive me for that.
Excellent physiological perspective on the sanctity of marriage.
Rejecting this consideration out-of-hand is a testament to the pervasiveness of irrational anger permeating the social fabric, inviting ridicule instead of spirited debate.
Before we have intellect and gender, we have life…
After intellect and gender, we have death…
In between the two, we have a rainbow of differentiation that leaves a biochemical/physiological footprint.
Intellect and gender are two sides of the same coin.
The coin is a physiological substrate that mediates our history (genetics) and our future (purpose).
Licentious sex does not require intellect (choice), but gender is intimately bound with intellect, and for a reason…
Love, and its expression in marriage.
It is impossible for this—-if a reality—-to not leave a record of its presence in the physiological milieu!
@ Robert Purnell. After I finished a 5 year sentence for a violent offence I noticed the natural smell of women, for just a day or two then it was gone. It was gorgeous. A bit like a new-born baby. And I was a heavy smoker at the time.
@ lovey..
lt’s unlikely humans are incapable of love.. there is after all the noun Love and it obviously describes something other than the verb lust..
but it probably.. as you assume.. means different things to different imbeciles..
There is One thing we can probably agree on though and quite likely is its purpose..
and that will be it inspires ‘Great Art’.. and without it ..no path to enlightenment…
Not of course that l’m advocating chatting up some lantern jawed harridan at the local drinking hole.. or scrolling through some on line meat market..
looking for Jennifers…
Desire is in the present. Love is the dream/intent to have a life together. Love is about the future.
Humans communicate primarily with facial expressions, from the day you are born you study your mother’s face, a facial expression can cause a baby to laugh or cry.
When humans mature, a woman’s primary way to attract a mate is her looks, and her red lips, a proxy for her inflammed vagina when ready to breed. Primates use visual references over smells like most other animals. (This is why the mask is anti-life, it is negating mating signals).
In pre-mating rituals, male and females flirt, then they kiss, and kissing is a way for a woman to measure the man’s genetic makeup. Also smell, an attractive smell (to her) makes her fall in love and want to mate. This was proven by the sweaty t-shirt study.
https://www.themantic-education.com/ibpsych/2019/11/19/key-study-the-sweaty-t-shirt-study-wedekind-et-al-1995/
Theory is this, woman prefer smells from genes farthest from their own, which will give their offspring the best chance of survival, since the child will have survival genetics from both parents.
A good story on how women prefer genes from outside of their tribe is when Capt Cook showed up to the Hawaiian islands, the native women swam out and immediately started mating with the sailors. Yep, those were the days before religion ruined everything.
Then the Christian missionaries came and ended the good time, and planet Kiave thorn trees to force the natives to wear shoes, and to this day if you are in downtown Konatown on the Big Island you might step on these damn 3″ thorns.
Like the previous poster said, marriage is a religious control mechanism, a way to force the father to pay for the child upbringing and not put it off on the church/state. It’s all about the shekels, Jews who run the money system do not want to pay for Goyim bastards.
Sweaty T-Shirt Experiment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAdt4Ei-ugc
How Your Brain Falls In Love | Dawn Maslar | TEDxBocaRaton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyq2Wo4eUDg
Note: you are tricked into breeding, that is part of the prison planet mechanism
What If The World is Actually a Prison? | The Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NBrce-ZHi0
Earth as hell, a prison planet, who runs it and why:
ALIEN INTERVIEW with Lawrence R. Spencer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOzK4ByFbzo
only natural society is the tribal !
modern masses are no natural therefore
they create arteficial tribes : leftist, jews,
communists, scientologes, rich class,
moslems, mormons, poststamp collectors
etc.
I forgot dog owners + breeders .
i see them in my neighbourhood
and dont associate with them since
their stupid dogs bark when i speak .
There is No Greater Injustice to Women than Being Denied Children & Family
Henry is right and it all comes from an establishment controlling the media and virtually every public institution which is bent on radical population reduction, and likely also an eugenics policy to breed people according to their own designs.
In my work I deal with all sorts of people on a one-on-one basis, and I get many personal disclosures the people would not admit to in public for fear of betraying the politically-correct groupthink which is mainly projected through the media (meaning mainstream radio, print media, movies, TV and corporate internet networks). What I have found with over 90% of the females under 40 in terms of what they really want is in this order:
#1- security – meaning not just money but a faithful and reliable partner;
#2 – family – meaning children; and then,
#3 – romance and sex.
Of course, in public or in any group setting most would likely give a reverse order. As for the men when it comes to women, most of them under 40 are either interested in sex first, then romance or a fling, then perhaps marriage and perhaps children, and then they only seem to consider security as an obligation if their mate should happen to get pregnant. Most abortions, by the way for those who don’t know are a result of males not providing any security to the woman or through male pressures to “get rid of it”.
I can’t help but think that the major reason for the real basic differences in desires between the sexes has to do with the fact that so much of the physical makeup and biology of women is devoted to reproduction. The very design of most women including hormones, organs, and shape is not just for sex but more fundamentally for reproduction and child-rearing and nurturing purposes, and most men do not seem to understand respect those facts. To most men these days in the West, a female breast is primarily a sex object, and most women have come to believe the same thing, mainly because of the top-down controls, and also because of the lack of the right ones.
The whole modern drift away from traditional values of respect for women and their penultimate importance in the continuation of the human race, has to do mainly with polices from the ruling establishment controlling the media and our educational systems to make people believe that the biological differences between the two sexes are irrelevant. In doing so, the article on oxytocin is further evidence that the designer effect is to destabilize and destroy the institution of marriage.
No greater harm, no greater injustice to women comes from our not recognizing and respecting the differences corresponding to our biological natures, and the denial of what they generally want most in life. It is the mainstream establishment conditioning, which has struck at the very roots of marriage and human happiness and especially with respect to raising well-adjusted and happy children. There are so many young women who simply want children and faithful husbands to be loving, faithful partners and good providers, but I am hearing from too many young women that the selection out there now is so very, very poor.
Many men these days expect sex on the second date, and many for some reason simply cannot make up their minds what they really want in life with the idea of wife, children, house, mortgage seeming to them like “de full catastrophe”. The constant fear porn generated by the establishment with the various contrived perils to the economy and continued life on earth has proven as we have clearly seen with the Covid fiasco as an example, a great deterrent to marriage and in having children. Birth rates, incidentally, have been significantly reduced over recent years, and the real dark winter ahead of us is the demographic blight ahead by our failure as a civilization to produce enough children to support and sustain ourselves. That is the real sustainability problem.
Of course, men cannot simply get off the hook for being victims of the establishment-generated fear porn, nor can they rely on the fact that women generally mature faster than they do, where many simply want to remain children most of their lives playing with their toys and having little in the way of any serous responsibilities. Many married men never grow up, putting the things like having a new pickup truck, which they don’t really need, in place of having a child. Of course, both men and women are easily drawn into the materialistic life-style choices of abundant travel or having a house, new furnishings, and even a summer place, requiring two incomes, even before they want or have their 1.2 children, which of course is their right, but such desires are also very much a product of the top- down media programing and advertising of which they are mainly victims.
As for the economy, there likely would be a much greater demand for services and goods if there were more children. Production and advertising would adjust accordingly. As for couples, instead of waiting until they have everything perfect for child rearing, they ought to remember that necessity is the mother of invention, and that all sorts of unforeseeable opportunities open to people once they start on a course where they cannot turn back. Such is the real spice of life, and for young people who are afraid of losing their personal freedom, they can find truth in what author G.K. Chesterton said some100 years ago, “A child is the very sign and sacrament of human freedom.”. Nothing is more liberating from the burden of self-centeredness than marriage and having children.
This entire equality bender which our Western civilization has been indoctrinated with is extremely damaging to the entire civilization, to marriages and family stability, and especially for most children in family arrangements where the natural differences are not respected, as psychologists such as Jordan Peterson have so often expressed. The equality insanity has led to women being forced to deny their biological natures not only with all of the abortions, but also in numerous occupations where the rough and tumble, or physical demands exceed their competence and/or their reliability. When it comes to premarital sex and temporary relationships, the injustice of that same insanity also overlooks the fact that women have a much smaller window of time in their lives to be fertile than men. Men can go on impregnating women, even in some cases to old age, while women become more and more limited in their fertility as they enter their 40’s. I have seen countless examples of young people living together for two or three years and then the guy takes off for another woman. The woman in most cases is most shattered. She has given the best years of her child-rearing years hoping for security based on a real and enduring commitment from her partner, but he turns out to be a user, a child, and a selfish ass with no insight.
Why sex should be put off in such relations before a marriage is essentially as Henry says, and to make a relationship secure and lasting, people must mate with someone where the bonding is not simply based on physical feelings and pleasure. As most of us have been taught from past ages, people first have to determine if their personalities are compatible and whether or not the love they express for each other is more than just based on the physical or external qualities of each other. Sexual activity will produce serotonin, dopamine, endorphins, and oxytocin in male and female bodies, and often fuel infatuations not based on anything deep or lasting.
How many of you have told someone that you love them? Where are they now? How many of you have been told by someone that they love you? Where are they now?
To a human, “love” is just another lie to get what you want. Like telling someone they’re “beautiful”. As if a human could ever be beautiful. LOFL.
I have mixed feelings about this one…I have slept with A LOT of women in my life, sometime 2 or 3 at a time. So, according to this, I am responsible for shaving some time off the lifespans of countless members of the fairer gender. I don’t buy it. While I do get the potential “depopulation” aspects of what the article suggests, I don’t think me shagging the daylights out of scores of women has shortened their lives in any way…unless explosive orgasms on their part have that effect, which I highly doubt.
I get that the proliferation of pornography was part of the agenda of the degradation and destruction of society, but I can’t say that had anything to do with my rather promiscuous sex life. I just like to think I was the right guy in the right place at the right time to enjoy the company of more women than I can really remember. And I don’t regret but a couple of them.
Happily married for 36 years..
What I’ve noticed is white women just don’t get the (((Joo))) trick of divide and conquer….white hetero males cannot be directly controlled by the (((Joo))), he and his traditional support bases has to be undermined…which starts with such things as Feminism etc. and is ending up with LGBQT etc.
If and when white women wake up(not “woke”) they will see the (((Joos))) have displaced women with queer/tranny etc. males…and women will sit on sidelines staring at the muzzled and handcuffed white hetero males who cannot save them for fear of various consequences.
Too bad..soo sad…but we tried to warn you.
@ O
A wonderfully scurrilous and hilarious comment.
I wanted to say that it was splendidly “dry” but I thought that would be a confusing use of the adjective.
@ andyay
Most kind! What also made her wonderful was her nerdy nervousness despite being a very attractive woman.
I have written several times (a great heresy, lol) that love of a beautiful woman is better than god, especially that bastard portrayed in the OT.
Religions tell you to love god, but how can you love a fiction? It is like mental masturbation, because loving god is loving your ego and what your ego says about god, that you are saved and those who do not worship your god (ego) are going to hell.
I have written a good essay on why assholes love the asshole god:
Why Do People Love an Asshole God?
On 3 Dec 2019 By jackyukon
https://i.imgur.com/fYVBUTp.jpg
https://ibb.co/5jGFYng
and this is why you should love a woman and not some stupid fake Jew god:
The Love of a Beautiful Woman is Better than God
On February 15, 2019 By YUKON JACK
https://ibb.co/10xv9SZ
FAT BASTARD John Haggee says “love gawwwwwd and send me more money: