Posted By The White Rose UK – 15/09/2022
The following is an excerpt from the book Global Conspiracy, by Hugh Williams, available at St Edward’s Press Ltd. To order the book, please visit the publisher’s website here.
Climate Change is another of the three biggest frauds being perpetrated in the world today. Here is a resumé of what William Happer had to say about Climate Change at Hillsdale College, Phoenix, Arizona on 24th February 2021. Some additional information has been gleaned from the writings of Chris Morrison and others.
First of all, the science
- Carbon Dioxide makes a vital contribution to our lives and economy. It is not a poisonous gas.
2. There is real air pollution. The pollution in China’s cities, like Shanghai, is due to burning stubble. It has nothing to do with CO2.
3. CO2 is not a pollutant at all. We each exhale about two pounds of CO2 per day and it constitutes about 4% of what we breathe out.
4. The earth is heated by the sun shining on the tropics and it then cools by radiating that heat out into space. Doing anything to alter this natural process achieves nothing in terms of controlling the levels of CO2.
5. CO2 helps to keep the earth at an even temperature because it, with water vapour, holds the earth’s heat. If it were not for these two, the earth would be an ice cube.
6. CO2 levels are never stable. If you put a CO2 meter in any place you can watch the way the levels of CO2 vary between say 300 and 1000 parts per million on any given day. It is therefore nonsense to say that, with these constant oscillations, CO2 levels are going up.
7. Doubling CO2 would make very little difference to the constitution of the atmosphere– a little less than 1%.
8. The predicted warming calculated by the Climate Change fanatics (supposedly caused by CO2) is much larger than what has been actually observed by balloons and satellites. In other words the models that the Climate Change scientists simply do not work; but nobody is prepared to admit this. However, the data from the balloons and satellites do agree with each other, that there is no warming.
9. There may, or may not, be a recent history of increased temperatures on earth but those measurements have been taken on the earth’s surface, and often in places that one can well imagine would be hot, as in car parks or on roof buildings. However, and to repeat, temperatures measured by balloons and from space show no increase in temperature.
10. What warming there has been has been beneficial. Increased CO2 is good news because, right now, we are living in a CO2 famine. CO2 levels in the past were far greater than today – twenty times greater – and, when it was at this higher level, life seems to have flourished better than today.
11. The earth is actually getting greener. West Australia is greening. So too western India, Sub Saharan Africa, western USA. They are all greener than they were twenty years ago.
12. The more CO2 you give a plant, the better it grows.
13. The holes in leaves are to let CO2 enter the leaf. Once inside, it combines with water to make sugar, and sunlight provides the energy, after which oxygen is released – a gas that we simply cannot live without.
14. In short, CO2 benefits the world.
15. The biggest source of human-caused CO2 is from vehicle emissions and cement manufacture.
16. Solar activity is beginning to decrease. We had a cooling period in the 1970s. Records tend to indicate that we may be entering a similar period now.
17. On a related matter: Sea levels are rising because rivers carry sediments into the sea in the form of mud. One can do nothing to stop that happening. Sea levels rise at nine inches a century. Trying to control CO2 will have no effect on sea levels.
18. The increase in CO2 is blamed for an apparent increase in earth temperatures, whereas the truth is the other way around. Increases in earth temperatures are followed by increases in CO2.
19. For example, we are told that manmade climate change is creating worse weather in terms of an increased number of storms but if one takes the rainfall in Wales, it has not changed for well over 100 years.
20. Sea temperatures at the Great Barrier Reef have not changed.
An 1871 dataset of sea temperatures across the Great Barrier Reef in Australia has been compared to recent measurements logged at the same reef areas. No differences in temperature were found by Dr. Bill Johnson, leading him to conclude: “Alarming claims that the East Australian Current has warmed due to global warming are therefore without foundation.”
21. In October 2020, the BBC reported that the Great Barrier Reef had lost half of its coral since 1995, citing a report that said it was due to “warmer seas driven by climate change”. But Professor Peter Ridd, who has spent 40 years observing the reef, noted recently that it was in robust good health. Coral growth rates have if anything “increased over the last 100 years”.
22. There have been 140 published papers casting doubt on the dominant role that CO2 is said to play in global atmospheric temperatures but do we ever hear of them?
23. The University of Massachusetts says that the CO2 released by humans between 1750 and 2018 was much too low to cause global warming.
24. The earth has warmed by about 1o since the end of the little ice age in about 1850.
25. The oceans hold vast reserves of CO2 and any natural warming is likely to release some of it into the atmosphere.
In short, there is nothing we should do about climate change!
The propaganda
- Happer is convinced that there is a Deep State driving a deliberately false agenda because there is no climate emergency. For example, there is now to be introduced in the US legislation mandating the declaration of a national climate emergency to prepare for this climate crisis but there is no climate crisis
2. At the state level, plans have been proposed that will “break the will” of the people who deny that there is a climate crisis.
3. This is how things are. Power corrupts science. Climate fanatics don’t care about the science.
4. When you raise this issue, you are told that 97% of the world science disagrees with you but arguing like that is illogical. What matters is not opinion, but fact. In science today, decisions are based on computer models that don’t work.
5. So many people are scared because they have been brainwashed. Children are getting an incessant barrage of propaganda that the world will end because their fathers are driving SUVs. They can’t sleep at night for worry.
Greta Thunberg is the great granddaughter of a Swedish chemist who said that CO2 is a good thing! She is conveniently oblivious of the fact that Sweden is enjoying higher forestry yields than it was twenty years ago partly because of increased CO2.
6. In 2006, the BBC held a seminar on climate change and decided to make their reports on this matter more partisan.
7. In 2022, $8 million has been given to organisations like the BBC and the Guardian from the likes of Bill Gates with the result that criticism of the theory that man causes global warming will be banned from the mainstream media. Any reports of dissent from this view will be dismissed as being insignificant.
8. The so-called 97% (possibly 90%) of scientists who all “agree” that humans cause climate change is bunk. Of the 12,000 reports just 0.5% or 65 papers suggested that humans are responsible.
9. De-carbonising, as well as being pointless and ineffective will be unbelievably costly. It will also make our industries unable to compete with overseas rivals.
10. This scare started when Michael Mann of Penn State University produced his infamous hockey-stick graph which deliberately removed the mediaeval warming period and subsequent little ice age.
11. Arctic ice is not retreating, let alone rapidly vanishing. In March 2022 (March is the month with the annual maximum extent of sea ice), the ice in the Arctic Ocean covered very nearly the same size as the 1991-2020 average, and well above the 2012 low point.
Conclusion
- If there is any warming, it’s caused by the sun.
2. The data shows that rather than rising CO2 causing increased earth temperatures, it is the increased temperatures that cause rising CO2, a conclusion echoed by two scientists quoted by Chris Morrison in the Daily Sceptic on 11th June 2022.
3. Climate catastrophists have registered forty years of wrong, and usually ludicrously high, forecasts.
4. Net Zero is not based on settled science.
5. There has been no global warming between 2015 and 2022.
6. Nothing that western governments have done has halted the rise in CO2.
7. No one believes that what the UK has done in terms of greening its environment to reduce CO2 has achieved anything. If they did, they would adopt the same mad policies.
8. Even when people agree about something in science, they are not guaranteed to be right. Wegener was ridiculed for his view about continental drift, but he has since been proved right.
And so, and to repeat, we should all do nothing about CO2 emissions.
Key points made by Anthony Watts and James Taylor in their Climate at a Glance for Teachers and Students:
- Crop yields set new records each year.
2. There are now fewer droughts than there were.
3. Climate change does not impact flooding.
4. The snowpack in the northern USA covers the same area as it did in the late 1960s.
5. Coral reefs are thriving, due to the slight increase in sea temperatures.
6. Greenland’s current ice loss is miniscule.
7. Pacific islands are increasing in size.
8. Oceans benefit from increased CO2
9. Ocean currents are speeding up, not slowing down as predicted.
10. There has been no increase in the number of hurricanes.
11. The same can be said about tornadoes.
12. Temperature rises have been falsified by placing measuring sites in car parks – i.e. surrounded by concrete, so no wonder their readings have been high! Satellite readings show that there has been no global warming recently.
13. There have been fewer heatwaves.
14. There has been no warming in the USA since 2005.
15. There have been fewer wildfires.
16. The predictions of islands disappearing have not been fulfilled.
17. The Covid lockdowns, while they may have reduced CO2 emissions, have not affected CO2 levels in the atmosphere.
18. Animal farming has no effect on greenhouse gas emissions.
19. Polar bear numbers have increased recently.
20. Climate change policies and climate activism pose a significant threat to national security
Now a book selling site?
Climate change isn’t a hoax. The climate changes all the time.
The weather is becoming more chaotic, and extreme, but it has nothing to do with human activities.
To set this in context, most sheeple live in urban spaces. You can fit all urban areas into just 2% of the Earth’s surface. You can fit all the continents into the Pacific Ocean, and have some spare.
The galactic clock ticks at its own pace, and flip & micronova show time is approaching. The evidence for this is like a tsunami with no clothes.
Nearby stars are going pop, and the changes on planets in our solar systems are self evident, even if you want to follow the Greta Thicko Thunberg tribe, or should I say sect. Oh dear Greta, the galactic clock has stolen your pathetic dreams… tut.
I’ve lived on the coast at, or slightly below, sea level for the past 29 years, and I haven’t been flooded out yet. As far as I can tell, sea level hasn’t risen by as much as an inch in all that time.
We also have to remember that the despicable “Saint Greta of the Thundercloud” is directly related to the Rothschild family, the certifiable LUNATICS behind all this nonsense, and who imagine themselves to be the “owners” of the world and everything in it purely because they control the world’s money.
I can imagine the REAL owner (Creator) of this world spitting in those bastards’ eyes when they die, but WE need to find a way to disempower these insane servants of the devil NOW, while we still have a living world.
>7. Doubling CO2 would make very little difference to the constitution of the atmosphere– a little less than 1%.
Should be: “…a little less than 0.1%.” Current levels are around 0.04% or 400ppm.
And doubling CO2 from .04% to .08% would include nature, which is roughly 90% to man’s 10% output (0.008%). Just to keep things in perspective!
Humans can make the world a lot better, greening the deserts, for example, and unless they are petty and fighting, they do want to make it better
To further what Barney says about the sea levels not rising, I will add my little bit. We bought an older sea front apartment here in Recife, Brazil back at the end of 2004. A few months later, the main newspaper here ran a front page article saying how the whole seafront here was under threat from the rising sea, and that within 10 years at most, the whole seafront and avenue running along it would all be destroyed by the rising sea. I remember being very glad we bought an older apartment, and not a new, expensive one. But now, 18 years later, there is absolutely no perceivable change to the sea level or seafront at all. I spoke to an older man on the beach a few years ago, that has lived here his whole life, and he laughed hard at the idea of the sea rising. He said he has seen no change since he was a young lad and first started coming to the beach here. It is all a complete fraud, the thing about rising sea levels. The climate changes, has always changed, and will always change; it’s what climates do. It all depends on the sun, sun controls climate. Just my little bit to add to it all.
The Climate Hoax narrative of the woke cult is not much different than the Economic Collapse Hoax narrative of the so-called “red pulled” folk. One says “the earth go kaboom!”, while the other shouts back “no, the economy go kaboom, because, duh, you know, the Fed!”
Tweedle dee, tweedle dum. Everyone loves to peddle in fear porn.
I found some mistakes:
quote: “7. Doubling CO2 would make very little difference to the constitution of the atmosphere– a little less than 1%.”
Doubling CO2 is far less than 1%. CO2 during peak ice age was 140-240 ppm. At the start of the industrial revolution, year 1800, CO2 was 280ppm, and now it is 415ppm. PPM is parts per million. Doubling 415 to 830ppm will be far less than 1%.
830/1,000.000 x 100 = 0.083% (that is less than 0.1 percent not 1%)
During earth’s 4.6 billion year history, scientists have painstakenly tried to measure past CO2 levels, using ice cores, they measure CO2 in trapped air bubbles, and mud cores, and father back they use rocks. Most of earth’s history CO2 is above 3,000 ppm.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=CO2+chart+earth+history&iax=images&ia=images
CO2 levels during peak glaciation, the last one ended only 20,000 years ago, CO2 got so low plants died, trees stopped growing. Plants need a minimum of 220ppm. and CO2 was getting down to 140-180 ppm. That means the planet was dying.
So this idea that CO2 is high right now is utter insanity, it is at BARE RECOVERY LEVELS. Saying CO2 is high in 2022 is like saying your gas tank is going to overflow when the gauge gets to 1/8 tank. These left wing lunatics are batshit insane, they have no idea about CO2 levels or what is good.
Furthermore, plants are now growing faster and the planet is greening. This has been observed in our lifetimes from satellite images. THAT MEANS THE PLANET IS RECOVERING FROM BEING NEARLY SUFFOCATED FROM LACK OF CO2.
If a plant’s growth rate goes up when you increase CO2, that means the plant evolved to live in much higher CO2 levels, as it’s genetics is optimized at higher levels.
Finally, you all need to say this outloud like a matra, WE ARE STILL IN THE ICE AGE, WE NEVER LEFT THE ICE AGE, AND WE ARE AT THE TAIL END OF THE INTERGLACIAL. All the temperature charts prove this, that optimal (or highest) temps occurred 8,000 years ago and the planet has been cooling since. Since CO2 does not affect temperature (it follows not forcing) that means temperatures will continue to fall regardless of what CO2 levels do.
If Bill Gates blots out the sun, let me tell you something, that will be the last thing man does before we go extinct, because we are already trending back into glaciation, and blotting out solar radiation would only accelerate the planet refreezing.
I will tell you something else, in the next ice age you will wish you had fur like Bigfoot.
Humans are naked apes on an ice age planet. That is beyond absurd, where in the hell did our fur go? We sure in hell did not evolve here! I will tell you something else, we didn’t just lose our fur we lost our marbles when they created us. We are insane hybrid alien x ape creatures. Looney tunes.
Just look at these images of all our living cousins, orangutans and great apes who live in sweltering jungles:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=great+apes+fur&t=ffab&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images
There is no global warming because we don’t live in a globe.
There is no ozone layer that’s being depleted because the sun and moon are WITHIN the atmosphere. An interesting concept is that the sun isn’t actually a super hot body, but instead triggers the air to heat up around us. That is there are no hot sun beams. I’m still looking into this. And with the moon, it does the opposite, giving off a cold light. In the sun, everything grows, whereas in moon’s light it dies.
But when you can get people to believe that we’re a ball, spinning around a fiery ball, itself spinning in a galaxy, itself traveling at super speeds from a big bang, then you can get them to believe in anything. Planets, meteors, aliens, alien invasions….are all now firmly in the minds of people, terrorised into bowing down to the world government that has to be created to combat this threat. A world defense force has to be created to fight the alien invasions (project blue beam/book) and of course, it will be used to quell opposition, all over the world to the tyranny of the bankers, world government.
All a joke. Throughout history there has been hot periods and colder periods. This happens because there are 13 months and NOT 12 as we’re told. The whole earth calendar is completely out of sync. This is why it’s warmer in winter and colder in the summer.
All of it is a lie, of epic proportion. As I’ve constantly stated, when people realise that we DO NOT live in a globe and the heliocentric model is 100% BS, will they understand that the global warming hypothesis holds no water, whatsoever; nothing but a colossal lie to control and make people exceptionally wealthy. I will also add that the drastic changes in temperature are also down to weather control, which they’ve been doing now for quite some time. Yes, they are spraying the skies and have been now for a while.
I’ve live continuously on the Gulf Coast of North Florida for fifty years now…no noticeable change in sea level has occurred.
I believe that the erratic, unusual weather that we’ve been seeing so much of lately is caused by humans…via weather manipulation by the “Deep State.” They are manipulating the weather to support the climate-change narrative, but they’re reaping other benefits too…land grabs for instance. California real estate is highly valued, and the fires there are likely partly due to weather manipulation. People are burned out, become disheartened, and sell their property at depreciated prices. Hurricanes are being strengthened and steered for the same purposes. Weather manipulation…the creation and exacerbation of droughts, floods, unusually hot or cold conditions, powerful cyclones and tornadoes, etc.,…can be used as a form of warfare too. And this warfare can be (and is) conducted against citizens of the country conducting the warfare as much as those of other countries.
Here’s a website that talks about weather manipulation at length: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org
The Jewish-Communist Overlords concocted this methane/carbon emission scam as a pretext to institute a techno-eco-Communist slave society. To ‘prove’ that ‘climate change’ exists they utilize their geoengineering technology to create artificial storms, tornadoes, droughts, fires, floods etc., thus convincing the stupid/insane masses of the ‘carbon threat’. Create the problem (climate change)–provide the solution (eco-Communism).
@ White Elephant,
Fantastic flat-erf fairytale, pal. Truly fantastic. Let me ask you an honest question: so, if this flat-erf model of yours, are we surrounded by a giant ice wall?
If so, is this giant comic book ice wall guarded by guys who look like John Snow, from Game of Thrones?!? Don’t get me wrong, I’m straight as a laser beam, but that John Snow is one devilishly handsome lad who has a certain “je ne sais quoi” about him … don’t you think, pal? If a bunch of John Snow’s are running around the ice wall, then sign me up for flat erf. I want to believe! LOL!
The homicidal Jew maniacs of the predator class (you know, the ones who control the corporate media and academia narratives) couldn’t actually give a standing piss about “climate change” or any related utter bullshit. It’s about them robbing every mumpin’ cent and taking perverse joy in shitting all over you in the process in their satanically insane insatiable drive for full-spectrum dominance and the utter destruction of everyone and everything not of their satanic tribe of psychopaths.
I saw the moronic sniveling head of the over-priced outerwear company Patagonia allegedly just donated the company lock, stock, and barrel to the demonic climate change cabal. That bleating imbecile should be disemboweled through his dick-hole and strangled with a section of his own intestines.
People had better quickly wise up because the satanists have picked up the pace and pressed the pedal to the metal in their war against reasonable society and humanity. I’d suggest a massive guerrilla marketing campaign with signs popping up everywhere saying, “It’s the Jews, stupid”. I’d also suggest following that up with a massive campaign of beatings and hangings for our enemies and their accomplices. Posthaste.
climate + CO2 business is Rothschilds
invention, same like his asylindustry business
to destroy USA+ Europa + to suck them
empty. + Greta Tunfish is his related agent .
Climate change or no climate change…why is desert-mountain far west Texas a whole lot greener now than the Texas Hill Country which gets an average of 40-60 inches of rain every year, and why is the desert region of far west Texas NOT in the usual drought-riden scenario that the rest of the US southwest is in now, esp. where food is grown? CHEMTRAILS, THAT’S WHY! Either that, or God is blessing a region that still believes in Him, unlike a large portion of Commiefornia, which worships Satan… Hmmm…
Mike D,
More ridicule, but I always have the last laugh and you will eventually accept the blatantly obvious reality that heliocentrism is a lie.
However, yes, we are encapsulated within an ice wall. There are many images on the earth. There is no east nor west, merely north and south for everywhere you move from north is its direct opposite – south. There is no magnetic south because there is no south pole. There is simply the center of the earth – north.
Beyond the ice wall there are many lands. More so, the oxygen that we breath is released from the firmament and being the heaviest gas in the air falls so that we may breath it. There is what is called sky ice, in the Antarctic that they are unable to transport out of. It is extremely cold and when it evaporates it does so into pure oxygen. Yes, the firmament is where our oxygen comes from NOT the trees and plants as we’re also lied to about, just as we have been lied to about everything on this earth and in our life.
You have a choice Mike D, you can continue being stupid or you can educate yourself, because let’s get something clear, you really are as are all those unable to see that the earth is flat, always has been flat and always will be flat. We have NEVER left this earth because we can’t. You are too gullible, along with others like you to science fiction and the writings of freemasons. I just laugh because I know that if there’s any intelligence in you, you’ll come to the conclusion that I’m right. In fact, I always am, pretty much most of the time. I have the capability to think critically. You don’t. That’s what separates the intelligent from the average on this earth.
Has anybody wondered why the global warming hysteria had been very quiet for the last few years but, the press has recently started up the alarmist rhetoric again?
If you are curious about this conundrum you should look up ‘Climategate’. This relates to the court scientists which were propagating all the alarmist rhetoric. A whistleblower hacked into their e-mails, a number of years ago, which showed these ‘scientists’ manipulating the data and peer review system, even outright lying about the data and laughing about it. Laughing about manipulating the raw data which is being used to change our lifes for the worse and costing us incredible amounts of money!
Over a thousand e-mails sent between the court scientists were put out by a whistle blower
An e-mail from Phil Jones, head ‘scientist at the Climate Research Unit , university of East Anglia to Michael Mann of Pennsylvania state university;
“P.S. I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a freedom of information act!”
These two people were Canadians Ross Mckitrick, a statician and Steve McIntyre an engineer. They were asking Jones for the raw data so they could replicate his findings.
E-mail from Phil Jones;
” McIntyre and McKitrick have been after the Climatic Research Unit data for years. If they ever hear there is a freedom of information act now in the United Kingdom, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send it to anyone.”
E-mail from Phil Jones February 21st 2005;
“Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it.”
Guess what. McIntyre and McKitrick filed an FOI . Jones replied they had lost most of the data whilst moving office. Uneffingbelievable!
E-mail from Phil Jones;
“Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith regarding the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report? Keith will do likewise.”
E-mail from Phil Jones;
“I’ve just completed Mike’s nature trick of adding in the real temperatures to each series for the last 20 years (i.e. from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”
Thus, manipulating the raw data.
E-mail from Michael Mann to Phil Jones;
“So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering ‘Climate Research’ as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board”
E-mail from Phil Jones to Mike Mann July 18th 2004
“The other paper by MM is just garbage- as you knew. De Freitas again. Pielke is also losing all credibility aswell by replying to the mad Finn as well- frequently as I see it. I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow- even if we have to redefine what the peer review literature is!”
reply from Phil Jones;
“I will be e-mailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.
There we have it, these court scientists were attempting to corrupt the peer review principles.
Great post – another keeper and something to send far and wide.
White Elephant–the best you will do is drag some people down to your illusions and make their lives more miserable as they get quietly rejected everywhere
What everyone needs to understand about this climate change farce is that humans are polluting the planet and destroying habitat, but they are not changing earth’s thermodynamics with CO2 output. Global Warming is a red herring, getting worried about a non-problem while industry keeps churning out all kinds of chemicals and plastics that end up in land fills and oceans. What they have done is diverted your attention from their real pollution to a non-existant problem.
CO2 can not warm the planet, that is one of the biggest lies put out by the MSM, along with the Holocaust gas chambers and Muslims did 911. Here is an example of why that is so. Say you are in Canada, where it is snowing 9 months of the year, and you decide to burn all the trees in Canada one night. So you do and if you are near the fires it is warm, until the fires go out. Then what happens? It goes back to cold very quickly and you will be cold but with no trees.
Where did the heat go? It goes in all directions, gets absorbed and re-emitted, but it all goes into space. ALL OF IT. So in a matter of hours all of the heat from all of the trees just disappears forever into space. And that CO2 in the air is plant food, so plants will eventually use it all to male cellulose. And those CO2 molecules which absorb ultraviolet, they instantly re-emit it, so CO2 does not hold the sun’s heat like everyone thinks.
At the end of the day, regardless of CO2 concentration in the air, the sun’s heat, like the heat from the forest fires, goes into space, and by the next morning you are right back to where you started before sunshine and burning of trees. The same is true for burning oil, men have burned over a trillion barrels of oil thus far, and where did the heat go? Into space and is also gone forever.
Then, when winter comes to Canada, it is freezing ass cold for months on end. Any residual heat in the atmosphere goes into space. So this idea, that the earth is going to become a hothouse is looney tunes, and who thinks you will ever be able to grow palm trees in Winnepeg? So anyone who buy this global warming bullshit is not understanding that the sun, not atmospheric gases are controlling the thermodynamic balance.
You can raise CO2 a hundred times, but if the sun goes out the planet will freeze into a ball of ice in weeks. CO2 ain’t got nothing to do with it. So if madman Bill Gates sprays the upper atmosphere to blot out solar irradiance, what will happen is the planet will go back into another ice age. Bill Gates is mad and must be stopped, and his believe in net carbon zero is also wrong, because if you make CO2 go to zero then no life can exist on the planet. Without CO2 we are all dead. And that CO2 has to be at least 240ppm for plants to even grow!
And the great untold story is that in the last two glacial periods, which last hundreds of thousands of year, many megafauna species died out, and the probable cause is cave man – but it could of been low CO2. Just remember you can not even farm below 240ppm CO2, which means in the previous ice ages farming was impossible! Ice ages are brutal, the planet is cold and dry, ice sheets cover Canada 2 miles thick!
Ice Age Reality vs. Climate Delusions
On February 27, 2020 By jackyukon
https://ibb.co/chnJVJ1
https://i.imgur.com/MHalQoV.jpg
@White Elephant,
Quote: “… Beyond the ice wall there are many lands. More so, the oxygen …” LOL!
This is first-rate comedy, pal! Truly outstanding. It’s like a cheap version of Tolkien-meets-Game of Thrones-meets-Final Fantasy-meets-JK Rowling. What makes your clown act so genuine is that you’re not even trying; hence the comic gold. i.e. you’re not trying to be funny, and that adds even more to the farcical element of your bozo claims. But, hey, you keep believing in your childish tales, while adults like me deal with the real problems facing our world.
Mike D,
“But, hey, you keep believing in your childish tales, while adults like me deal with the real problems facing our world.”
I actually do deal with the real problems in my posts – no heliocentrism = no climate change/carbon footprint regulation due to no greenhouse gases depleting an imaginary ozone layer, to keep out the deadly rays of a massive ball of fire, millions of miles away, that going to give off a sunflare, sometime in the future, that will wipe out humanity. No planets, therefore no alien invasions, therefore no global defense force to be controlled by a world government. I’m one of the very few people, on this website who actually tells the truth, as it’s all I’ve ever done, since I started informing the public about what’s going on over 25 years ago now.
You don’t see reality Mike because, well, you’re stupid. You’re ignorant through choice, ridiculing and castigating when you should instead be researching and coming to common agreement. You won’t because of cognitive dissonance in your world/universe view going all the way back to a child with the globe earth, sitting on the teacher’s table. You are incapable of critical thinking which, as stated in previous posts, only goes to promote that you are very probably a troll. And there are others on this forum just like you, whom I now, simply, ignore.
@ White Elephant.
We’ve been through this over and over on previous threads. Between the two of us , overwhelming , irrefutable evidence has been presented to disprove absurd globe/ helio model. Mike D. doesn’t genuinely dispute geocentrism or flat earth. He’s trolling. His handlers have told him to gatekeep on this issue , so like a good little errand boy , he obediently complies.
Geocentric flat earth changes everything. As you correctly point out , all the other deceptions would unravel if humanity knew this truth.
Welef–no world traveller has ever come off the boat or plane or Land Rover and said “Hey, you know what? That globe map we use is wrong; I found 500 miles that aren’t on it!” All journeys correspond to the map we use
A bit off topic , but as follow on from White Elephant comments
Look at this image of New Zealand, supposedly taken from “international space station”
https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/q22pd0/nz_view_from_the_international_space_station/
Notice the absurd line of earth’s “curvature” – completely out of perspective to the size & proximity of NZ’s landmass shown. Why show this at all? View of NZ taken from a great height
ok. But why the curved demarcation?
In fact one can observe that nearly all pictures taken from “space” make a point of displaying a line of curvature- which I’ve come to conclude is simply fake- added to reinforce the belief in global earth in outer space . They also photoshop in a bit of satellite equipment here and there for added effect. A discerning eye can tell something is “off” about all these pictures.
Overall, there is simply too much proof of fakery used – eg the Moon Landing- including the proven faked view of earth from afar,… the filming of crew inside “space station” , ..fake Mars footage obviously filmed in a desert here, Etc etc. etc.
It is obvious that they want to convince the public of things that are not true – including “globe earth”
As a result I no longer believe in any of it !
markie,
Yes, you are correct, obviously, but I’ve written what I have for new viewers to TT who have doubts on heliocentrism. I’m simply making the points, to prove, again as you correctly state, that all what’s going on at the moment to the detriment of humanity, disappears under geocentrism.
As we’ve both implied Mike D is a troll, however, there is every possibility that he’s just, plain, ignorant and incredibly stupid. We can’t discount this.
My sister’s a journalist and producer and she is stupid, although she believes herself incredibly intelligent. A left wing, enjoys fraternising with the upper echelons of society and believes everything we regularly destroy here on TT. She truly does believe in everything that we’ve disproved here.
I’ve been telling the truth for quite some time now. I’ve been ridiculed for quite some time now as well. However, it doesn’t dissuade me from my path. It’s not the trolls that I bother about. I’m not interested in them. I look for those who are on the fence, those who are still sceptical of what’s going on. It just needs a seed to be planted and they’re off, seeing reality as it should be seen. I aim to smash the mirrors and blow away the smoke. And I do.
Montague,
The whole thing is insane. It’s ludicrous. If you truly, still believe in heliocentrism after ALL the information out there, on the internet, utterly obliterating it, with proof after proof after proof, then you’re either incredibly stupid or a troll.
Take the reality that we’re, supposedly spinning at 1,040mph or 1,664,000 metres per hour. That means that it’s rotating at 0.28 miles per second or 448 metres per second. Now let’s think about that shall we? People are still incapable of understanding this. In the time you jump up the earth beneath you has moved 448metres. And then of course they’ll say “ah but if you’re born on a train, you don’t feel motion” – of course, if you’re traveling straight forwards and backwards but you certainly do if you TURN which is precisely what this earth is doing, as we are told. Try turning a corner, in your car, traveling at 100 mph, let alone 1,040mph, and see how you get on.
Then also take the fact that if you took off in a Boeing 747, at London’s Heathrow traveling to Paris, at 450mph, with the earth spinning counter clockwise, Paris would reach the plane, before the plane reached Paris.
And yet, laughably people will still come on and say “Ah, but you see, there’s gravity and the fact that everything within the globe is connected. The air is connected to the land and spins at the same speed etc etc…” – It is this precise stupidity we have to deal with.
Like I said – trolls or just incredibly stupid people courtesy of years of indoctrination and the inability to think critically.
Montague–none of it is fake, and plebs are getting more paranoid, and maybe jealous, or institutionalised: “Naahhbuddy cud do dat!!”. Luckily it is still only one per cent
White Elephant
You completely misconstrued my comment.
I was explaining WHY I NO LONGER BELIEVE IN GLOBE EARTH.
W Elephant–“if we tell people we are not on a globe, they won’t believe the Global Warming hoax; this is the best strategy”. Have you ever listened to yourself? The atmosphere moves with the land because of friction and gravity, not just the latter. Go higher up and there are (apparent) strong winds, as the gravitational effect is less. Mike D is high IQ, not a troll, but you are high paranoia and perhaps jealous of the capable, feeling left out of human achievements, but only the top thousandth can do certain things. The chances that you are among them are only one in a thousand and you should accept your actual relative value
Montague,
I didn’t misconstrue your comment in the least.
Your comment pointed out that the earth’s curvature over New Zealand was ludicrous. Therefore no curvature. Therefore no globe earth.
That’s what I was pointing out also in my reply – no globe earth/heliocentrism.